Atrial automatic tachycardia-reversion pacemakers: their economic viability and impact on quality-of-life

Pacing therapy for atrial tachyarrhythmias

The use of pacing techniques for the treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias has been advocated for more than 30 years. Although it has played a beneficial role in the management of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) in drug-refractory patients, tachycardia acceleration and development of atrial fibrillation has been the major drawback. With the availability of radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy, the use of implantable antitachycardia devices for PSVT is currently negligible. From retrospective and small control studies it has been shown that atrial or dual-chamber pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome has been associated with a lower incidence of paroxysmal atrial flutter or fibrillation than in those who received a ventricular pacemaker. Furthermore, recent studies have reported the potential benefit of reducing frequency of paroxysmal atrial flutter and fibrillation with multisite atrial pacing. As a result, there is a resurgence of research interest in antitachycardia pacing for prevention of atrial tachyarrhythmias. This paper briefly describes the basic aspects of antitachycardia pacing, reviews the data on the use of implantable antitachycardia devices for PSVT and the selection of patients, and assesses the current status of research on atrial pacing for prevention of paroxysmal atrial flutter and fibrillation.

Efficacy of pacemaker tachycardia termination algorithms: is electrophysiological testing alone adequate?

Selection of an optimal pacemaker tachycardia reversion algorithm is generally performed utilizing programmed electrical stimulation (PES). Multiple tachycardias are induced and various tachycardia termination protocols are tested for reversion success. However, PES may induce nonclinical tachycardia and result in an inaccurate assessment of subsequent reversion effectiveness for spontaneous tachycardia. To investigate this question, we compared tachycardia reversion protocol success for PES-induced tachycardia versus spontaneously occurring tachycardia in 16 patients with atrially placed Intermedics 262-12 antitachycardia pacemakers. The pacemaker has tachycardia response counters, and the reversion success was calculated from these counters. This was performed by comparing the percent of time 1 degree versus 2 degrees modality use occurred; crossover to the 2 degrees modality implied failure of the 1 degree modality to convert the tachycardia. PES was used to induce multiple episodes of tachycardia and spontaneous episodes of tachycardia were recorded over time by pacemaker counters. The pacemaker 1 degree modality success was then compared for spontaneous and induced arrhythmias.

RESULTS

A total of 53 discrete data comparisons of PES versus spontaneous tachycardia counters were performed in the 16 patients. PES reversion success occurred 85% +/- 22% of the time versus a spontaneous reversion success of 88% +/- 22%. However, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient test demonstrated nonsignficant overall correlation (P < 0.01), and Pearson correlation on an individual patient basis varied widely (r value from < 0.1 to 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

When utilizing the same termination algorithm, the percentage conversion of tachycardias occurring spontaneously and induced by PES is similar but does not correlate well overall. This suggests that PES may not be a good linear predictor of the long-term success of antitachycardia pacing algorithms.

Long-term follow up of patients treated with a software based antitachycardia pacemaker

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decade, several advances have been made in the management of tachycardias by pacing techniques, but limited data are available on the long-term outcome of patients treated with antitachycardia pacemakers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An antitachycardia pacemaker, the Intermedics Intertach, was implanted in 22 (17 female) patients with supraventricular tachycardia over a five year period. All were selected after detailed evaluation and testing of a temporary antitachycardia pacemaker system showed that their arrhythmia could be stopped promptly, reliably, and under different physiological conditions.

RESULTS

The 22 patients have been followed up for a mean period of 57.3 (range 19-76) months. All except one of the patients has had frequent episodes of tachycardia reliably ended by the pacemaker. Complications have occurred in seven patients, necessitating removal of the pacing system in four. Of the 18 patients who continue to have pacemakers, seven are being treated with beta blockers or verapamil; no other antiarrhythmic drugs are being taken.

CONCLUSIONS

Antitachycardia pacing is an acceptable long-term option for carefully selected patients with supraventricular tachycardia, but even after extensive testing a substantial number of the patients may continue to require drug treatment. Furthermore, the widespread use of curative techniques for supraventricular arrhythmias (catheter ablation and surgery) has decreased the need for this palliative treatment.

The effect of chronic atrial overdrive suppression pacing on the incidence of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

Chronic overdrive suppression pacing has been suggested as an effective adjunctive method for reducing the incidence of cardiac tachyarrhythmias. Documentation of effectiveness during prolonged monitoring is lacking, however. To assess more accurately the long-term utility of this treatment modality for medically refractory supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTs), 10 patients with atrially implanted Intermedics Intertach pacemakers were randomly assigned to either a low or a high bradycardia (back-up) pacing rate. SVT counts were performed during matching follow-up periods both at the initial rate and after rate crossover. The primary antitachycardia modality of this pacemaker (P mod) provides burst pacing to terminate tachycardia episodes, and P mod counters were utilized to quantitate SVT episodes. Tachycardia termination algorithms were programmed to "no restart" and were not changed during the study. The P mod use counter, therefore, reflected the number of discrete episodes of SVTs. Pacemaker implantation diagnoses include atrial flutter, concealed bypass tract, AV nodal reentry, intraatrial reentry, and Wolff-Parkinson-White associated tachycardia. Patient age was 59 +/- 18 yrs. The average pacemaker back-up low rate was 45.7 +/- 4 versus a back-up high rate of 85.1 +/- 2 beats/min. Follow-up was for 57.4 days +/- 33 days at the low rate and 57.3 days +/- 34 days at the high rate (r = 0.99). There was no difference in SVT incidence with a P mod usage of 98.4 +/- 106 at the low rate and 100.8 +/- 94 at the high rate (p = NS). In this blinded, randomized cross-over trial, chronic atrial overdrive suppression pacing did not reduce the overall incidence of SVT episodes during prolonged monitoring.

Comparison of the cost of radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node and medical therapy for drug-refractory atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia

The purpose of this study was to determine the charges for radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular (AV) node in 15 patients with symptomatic AV node reentrant tachycardia despite pharmacologic therapy and to compare these charges with the estimated charges for health care utilization by the same patients before the catheter procedure was performed. There were seven men and eight women with a mean age of 50 +/- 17 years. The mean duration and frequency of symptoms were 16 +/- 9 years and 4.5 +/- 6 episodes/month, respectively. Fourteen of the 15 patients required only one procedure for diagnosis and cure of AV node reentrant tachycardia and 1 patient required two sessions. All patients underwent electrophysiologic study before discharge from the hospital to confirm the short-term efficacy of the procedure. The mean duration of the hospital stay was 3 +/- 1.5 days and the mean total charge/patient expressed in 1991 dollars was $15,893 +/- $3,338 for catheter modification. These total charges consisted of hospital charges of $8,105 +/- $2,466 and physician charges of $7,788 +/- $971. All patients had a successful outcome and required no additional antiarrhythmic therapy. The estimated cost of health care utilization for these 15 patients before cure of AV node reentrant tachycardia was $7,651/patient per year. These estimated costs included charges incurred for emergency room visits, office visits, hospitalizations and antiarrhythmic drug therapy. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that the annual health care costs incurred by patients who have symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia caused by AV node reentry are substantial.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antitachycardia devices: realities and promises

Nonpharmacologic therapy for ventricular arrhythmias has gained growing attention with the development of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. In addition, the reports of adverse effects of drug therapy from several studies, including the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST), have supported the need for these devices. The development of new implantable cardioverter-defibrillators that have the capability of antitachycardia pacing, bradycardia pacing, cardioversion and defibrillation has enhanced their clinical utility. The currently available implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have been shown to significantly improve survival after sudden cardiac arrest in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Newer devices with expanded capabilities may reduce mortality even further. In this report the features of currently available antitachycardia devices and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are reviewed and the features and current implant data on newer antitachycardia devices are discussed.

Antitachycardia pacemaker treatment of postoperative arrhythmias in pediatric patients

An automatic antitachycardia pulse generator (Intertach 262-12) was implanted in each of six pediatric patients (mean age, 10 years) with drug-resistant and persistent postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias. Four had bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome, two after a Mustard procedure for transposition of the great arteries, one after a Senning procedure for the same anomaly, and one after a Fontan procedure for univentricular heart with transposition of the great arteries. Of the two remaining patients, one had atrial flutter after a modified Fontan procedure for univentricular heart and one had intra-atrial reentry tachycardia after a modified Fontan procedure for double-outlet right ventricle with pulmonary stenosis. During a mean follow-up interval of 31 months after implantation, pacemakers were activated on multiple occasions and functioned appropriately in all six patients. Complications necessitated six invasive interventions in three patients: erosion or infection of the system, adaptor fracture, and connector block fracture on one occasion each and lead dislodgment on three occasions. Four of the six patients continued to take drugs at the end of this study; however, all patients had their drug therapy reduced and one was taking digoxin only. The number of hospital admissions decreased after implantation. Despite a number of technical challenges, this newer multiprogrammable antitachycardia pacemaker appears to be a valuable addition to the treatment of refractory postoperative supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in pediatric patients.