Antitachycardia pacemaker treatment of postoperative arrhythmias in pediatric patients

Management of intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intraatrial reentrant tachycardia (IART), a difficult arrhythmia to manage, is likely to become more prevalent as the population of patients with congenital heart disease grows. While pharmacologic therapy alone often remains inadequate, important advances in nonpharmacologic therapy have occurred recently, enhancing the currently available therapeutic options. This review focuses on advances in electroanatomic mapping and catheter ablation, developments in arrhythmia surgery, and device therapy for IART.

RECENT FINDINGS

While catheter ablation for IART has high early recurrence rates, the lack of late recurrence in long-term follow-up is encouraging. Acute success may be improved with greater appreciation for reentrant circuits with current electroanatomic mapping systems, and with larger lesions that can be achieved with the use of irrigated-tip catheters. Arrhythmia surgery at the time of Fontan revision has good short-term and medium-term results, and is being studied as a prophylactic measure at initial Fontan surgery. Device therapy for IART now includes algorithms to prevent atrial arrhythmias, as well as antitachycardia pacing, which can be used safely and has very high efficacy for certain subgroups.

SUMMARY

Due to recent advances in mapping and ablation technology, coupled with developments in arrhythmia surgery and device therapy, the armamentarium of nonpharmacologic management of IART has become more potent. There are still, however, unique challenges posed by patients with congenital heart disease, and long-term follow-up in large numbers of patients with IART are required for this expanding population of patients.

Use of DDDRP Pacing Device in Prevention and Treatment of Tachy-Brady Syndrome After Mustard Procedure

A 13-year-old male patient, who underwent Mustard operation for a very complex congenital heart disease (CHD), after palliation presented a decrease of the sinus node function, developing a tachy-brady syndrome and a mild dysfunction of atrioventricular (AV) conduction. He was successfully treated using a DDDRP pacemaker, which ensured a suitable atrial rhythm and was able to interrupt supraventricular tachycardia episodes. Until now, hospitalization related to episodes of heart failure or symptomatic arrhythmia, has not been necessary.

Sinus node dysfunction and atrial tachycardia after the Fontan procedure: The scope of the problem

Similar to other atrial baffling procedures, the Fontan procedure exposes patients to ongoing morbidity and mortality. The development of the bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome can have adverse effects on already-marginal hemodynamics and ventricular function. Patients with Fontan physiology and sinus node dysfunction can be managed with antibradycardic pacemakers. Atrial arrhythmias after "completion Fontan" are difficult to treat and usually require either antiarrhythmic agents, antitachycardic pacemakers, or radiofrequency catheter ablation of the re-entrant circuit. Successful treatment of atrial flutter occurs in only 50% to 70% of patients. There is a high recurrence rate of atrial flutter with any of the accepted management strategies. Copyright 1998 by W.B. Saunders Company

Impact of arrhythmia circuit cryoablation during Fontan conversion for refractory atrial tachycardia

Refractory atrial arrhythmias in late postoperative Fontan patients are usually associated with residual hemodynamic abnormalities and result in significant morbidity and mortality. Surgical revision of the Fontan anastomosis may improve hemodynamics without eliminating tachycardia. This study sought to assess the impact of surgical cryoablation of the arrhythmia circuit at the time of Fontan conversion on the clinical recurrence of tachycardia. Sixteen consecutive atriopulmonary Fontan patients with refractory atrial arrhythmias underwent surgical conversion to lateral tunnel total cavopulmonary anastomosis (15) or Fontan revision (1 patient). The initial 4 patients underwent Fontan conversions alone, without specific arrhythmia surgery. The subsequent 12 patients underwent electrophysiologically guided cryoablation of the tachycardia circuits at the time of surgical conversion. The mean age at Fontan revision was 15.6 +/- 3.8 years. Cryoablation was directed to 3 identified major tachycardia circuits: the inferomedial right atrium, the superior rim of the prior atrial septal defect patch, and along the lateral right atrial wall. Transmural antitachycardia pacemakers were implanted in 11 of the 16 patients. There was no surgical mortality in either group, and all patients improved in functional classification. All patients not undergoing cryoablation experienced recurrent symptomatic tachycardia requiring antiarrhythmic therapy (median follow-up, 54 months) versus 2 of 12 patients receiving cryoablation (median follow-up, 25 months; p <0.02). Thus, surgical cryoablation of the arrhythmia circuit at the time of Fontan conversion is highly effective in the management of refractory atrial arrhythmias, and is superior to Fontan conversion alone.

Permanent overdrive atrial pacing in the chronic management of recurrent postoperative atrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with complex congenital heart disease

This study investigated the value of permanent atrial pacing as an adjunct to the current therapy in the chronic management of recurrent postoperative atrial reentrant tachycardia in patients with complex congenital heart disease. We studied the postpacing clinical course in 18 patients with recurrent atrial reentrant tachycardias unresponsive to conventional therapy who had an implanted atrial pacemaker. The pacemaker was programmed at a lower pacing rate 20% faster than the spontaneous mean daily rate previously determined with 24-hour Holter monitoring. Serial Holter recordings and pacemaker programming sessions were subsequently performed trying to maintain a paced atrial rhythm overdriving the spontaneous rhythm as long as possible. Twenty-four hour Holter monitoring documented a prevalent (> 80%) paced rhythm during the daily hours in all patients during the follow-up; all patients, however, required at least once a variation in programmed mode and pacing rate. Antiarrhythmic medications were discontinued after 6 months if the patient remained arrhythmia free while on pacing. Recurrences of atrial reentrant tachycardia occurred in five patients (29%) during the initial 6 months interval after the pacemaker implantation, while late recurrences occurred in only two patients (11%). One patient died suddenly 10 months after the pacemaker implant. At the end of the follow-up, 15 patients (83%) were arrhythmia-free and only 2 of them were still on antiarrhythmic drugs. We conclude that permanent atrial overdrive pacing can be an important tool in the management of patients with atrial reentrant tachycardia following repair of congenital heart disease.

Benefits and potential risks of atrial antitachycardia pacing after repair of congenital heart disease

Atrial reentry tachycardia is common after surgical repair of congenital heart disease. The arrhythmia is often difficult to treat and is occasionally life-threatening. This study reports experience with atrial antitachycardia (AAIT mode) pacing for the management of atrial reentry tachycardia, with emphasis on the risks and benefits of automatic pacing therapy. Eighteen patients (2-32 years of age) with a variety of congenital heart lesions underwent atrial antitachycardia pacemaker placement for recurrent atrial tachycardia that was amenable to pace termination prior to the implantation procedure. An appropriate antitachycardia program was determined by repeated induction and termination of atrial tachycardia using the noninvasive programmed stimulation mode of the pacemaker. Over 4-30 months of follow-up, 6 patients had 189 episodes of tachycardia successfully converted with AAI-T pacing, 4 patients had 8 episodes of tachycardia detected but not successfully converted, and 8 patients had no episodes of tachycardia with antibradycardia pacing alone. The number of patients receiving pharmacological therapy other than digoxin or beta blockade fell from 12 to 6. Two subjects died suddenly, 1 while wearing a Holter monitor. In both, tachycardia was detected and pace cardioversion attempted.

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial antitachycardia pacing is a useful tool in the management of patients with congenital heart disease and atrial arrhythmias; however, in selected cases, it may not prevent and may even exacerbate the lethal complications of the tachycardia. Antitachycardia function evaluation is recommended under varying levels of autonomic stress prior to institution of automatic therapy.

Analysis of set screw and side-lock connector reliability

A retrospective review of complications with connectors and lead-to-header interfaces was performed following 649 pacing procedures between 1980 and 1990. There were 88 lead revisions (13.6%), 81 device replacements or modifications (12.5%), and 480 new implants (74%) using devices of five manufacturers. Two basic connector types were studied, one utilizing a set screw and the other using a side-lock compression fitting. The set screw makes electrical contact and mechanically secures the lead connector pin with a set screw insulated by a self-sealing grommet or an integral or separate set screw cover. The side-lock makes electrical contact with an automatic spring mechanism while the plastic lead terminal is secured in the connector block of the pacemaker by a Delrin side-lock compression fitting. Four hundred fifty-nine set screw connector devices were followed for up to 12 years with 14 complications (3.1%) whereas 82 side-lock connector devices were followed for up to 5 years with one complication (1.2%). The set screw and side-lock connectors were reliable over the period of follow-up. Although the complication rate appeared lower with the side-lock, follow-up was shorter and the number of implants smaller. With the leads used in this study, the side-lock proved to be a desirable feature due to simplicity, speed, safety, and ease of use. One limitation is the requirement for a precise IS-1 connector terminal diameter.

Steroid-eluting epicardial pacing leads in pediatric patients: encouraging early results

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the pacing and sensing characteristics of a new porous-tipped steroid-eluting epicardial lead in a group of pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND

Pacing in children may be complicated by small patient size, patient growth and the prevalence of structural congenital heart disease in children requiring pacing. Epicardial pacing has been associated with a high incidence of problems with sensing and capture, prompting the use of transvenous endocardial pacing when possible. In some children, epicardial pacing may still be desirable because of small patient size, potential for caval obstruction, previous cardiac surgery limiting transvenous access to the heart, or the need to repair congenital heart disease at the time of pacemaker insertion.

METHODS

Twelve patients aged 3 weeks to 18 years underwent placement of 23 epicardial pacing leads (8 atrial, 15 ventricular). Pulse width thresholds, sensing thresholds and lead impedance were measured weekly for 6 weeks, then at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after pacemaker implantation. The median duration of follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

Ventricular pulse width thresholds did not change over time, whereas atrial pulse width thresholds improved significantly. At 6 months, the mean pulse width threshold at 2.5 V for the atrial and ventricular leads was 0.10 +/- 0.03 and 0.19 +/- 0.09 ms, respectively. The thresholds were slightly lower at 12 and 18 months. At the most recent follow-up, all atrial leads sensed appropriately at 2.5 mV and all ventricular leads at 5 mV.

CONCLUSIONS

These encouraging early results suggest that steroid-eluting epicardial pacing leads may be an attractive option for children needing epicardial pacing. Their excellent pacing and sensing characteristics may allow reliable dual-chamber pacing in infants who are too small for transvenous pacing.