Termination and acceleration of ventricular tachycardia with autodecremental pacing, burst pacing, and cardioversion in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Multicenter PCD Investigator Group

Arrhythmogenicity of anti-tachycardia pacing in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator

BACKGROUND

Anti-tachycardia pacing therapy (ATP) has shown comparable efficacy to shock therapy in ventricular tachycardia (VT) termination with better quality of life. However, some ATPs may lead to VT acceleration or degeneration to ventricular fibrillation (VF), which will result in more ICD shocks. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictors of VT acceleration by ATP therapy in a real-life patient cohort.

RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed 448 monomorphic VT episodes that required ATP therapy in 60 patients with structural heart diseases implanted with ICD or CRTD. The clinical data of the patients and the episodes' details were evaluated. We found that patients with a higher ejection fraction (EF) were more likely to be cardioverted by ATP therapy (P: 0.024). VT acceleration was more frequent in patients with lower EF (mean 31.24 ± 4.08) compared with the non-accelerated patients with higher EF (mean 37.00 ± 9.4, P: 0.016). The percentage of accelerated episodes was 8.5%. VT episodes with a mean cycle length (CL) < 310 ms are more likely to accelerate (sensitivity 76.3%, specificity 67.7%, PPV value 45%, NPV 86%, and AUC 0.790). There was a statistically significant difference in the accelerated VT episodes as compared to non-accelerated episodes regarding the number of ATP bursts (mean 3.66 ± 2.22 vs. 1.76 ± 1.35, P: < 0.001), ramp (23.7% vs. 4.2%, P: < 0.001), scanning (55.3% vs. 31.3%, P: 0.003) and burst adaptive cycle length (mean 83.55 ± 2.92 vs. 84.64 ± 2.61, P: 0.016). In a multivariate analysis, the VT CL, number of ATP bursts and ramp pacing predicted VT acceleration by ATP therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular tachycardia in patients with low LV EF and fast VTs with a CL less than 310 ms were more likely to accelerate with ATP therapy. The number of ATP bursts and the use of ramp had a significant effect on VT acceleration. To avoid VT acceleration by ATP therapy, ramp pacing better be avoided, especially in fast VTs, and lesser number of bursts should be delivered.

Comparison of burst versus ramp antitachycardia pacing therapy for ventricular tachycardia: A meta-analysis

Current guidelines recommend at least one attempt of defibrillator antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy, showing preference for burst therapy. The objective of this study is to compare ramp versus burst ATP therapy proportion of success and acceleration in treating spontaneous or induced ventricular tachycardia (VT). The review protocol was previously published in PROSPERO. Data synthesis and measures of heterogeneity (I² ) was performed by CMA® software v.3 comparing proportions in both groups. Sensitivity analysis was performed as subgroup or meta-regression according to quality, clinical characteristics, and differences in design. Thirteen studies including 30,117 VT episodes in 1672 patients were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the proportion of success between burst and ramp therapy in spontaneous VT (odds ratio = 1.116; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.788-1.579; I²  = 89%). There was no significant difference in the proportion of success between burst and ramp therapy in induced VT (odds ratio = 0.820; 95% CI = 0.468-1.437; I²  = 93%). No significant difference was found in the proportion of acceleration between burst and ramp in spontaneous VT (odds ratio = 0.792; 95% CI = 0.476-1.317; I²  = 83%). No significant difference was found in the proportion of acceleration between burst and ramp in induced VT (odds ratio = 1.234; 95% CI = 0.802-1.898; I²  = 55%). Sensitivity analysis did not change main results. There is no difference in success or in acceleration proportion between burst or ramp ATP therapy irrespective if the VT was spontaneous or induced. Future implantable cardioverter defibrillator programming guidelines should offer both ATP therapies without preference in one of them.

Patient-by-patient basis anti-tachycardia pacing for fast ventricular tachycardia with structural heart diseases

BACKGROUND

Anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) delivered from an implantable device is an important tool to terminate ventricular tachycardia (VT). But its real-world efficacy for fast VT has not been fully studied.

METHODS

Using the database of Nippon-storm study, effect of patient-by-patient basis ATP programming for fast VT (≥188 bpm) was assessed for the patients with structural heart diseases. Fast VTs were divided into three groups depending on heart rate (HR); Group A was 188-209 bpm, and Group-B and Group-C were 210-239 bpm and ≥240 bpm, respectively.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 28 months, 202 fast VT episodes (209 ± 19 bpm) were demonstrated in the 85 patients. ATP terminated 151 of the 202 episodes (74.8%) in total. The success rate of the ATP was not different among the three groups: 73.3% in Group A, 80.6% in Group B, and 66.7% in Group C. ATP success rate of >50% and >70% was 77.6% and 64.7% of the patients, respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly higher in the patients with rather than without successful ATP therapy, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that LVEF of 23% was the optimal cut-off value. ATP was less effective in patients taking amiodarone, but etiology of the structural heart diseases, indication of the device implantation, and all Electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters were not useful predictors for successful ATP therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

ATP highly terminated fast VT with wide HR ranges in patients with structural heart diseases, and should be considered as the first-line therapy for fast VT except for patients with very low LVEF.

What factors lead to the acceleration of ventricular tachycardia during antitachycardia pacing?-Results from over 1000 episodes

Introduction

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) acceleration due to antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy could be often observed in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), which usually results in additional shock. However, few studies focused on the risk factors for VT acceleration caused by ATP therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate risk factors for VT acceleration due to ATP delivery.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1056 ATP episodes in 33 patients with structural heart diseases, of whom clinical characteristics and episodes details were evaluated.

Results

At individual patient level, number of VT morphologies recorded in electrograms during follow‐up was a risk factor with cutoff point of 1 (AUC 0.79, sensitivity 72.7%, specificity 77.3%, P < .001) to predict ATP acceleration (OR 3.50, P = .008). From episode‐based analysis, VT cycle length (VTCL) and mean variation in VTCL were risk factors to predict ATP acceleration (OR 0.98, P < 0.001 vs OR 1.06, P < .001, respectively), with cutoff points of 347 ms (AUC 0.67, sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 47.6%, P < .001) and 7.3 ms (AUC 0.66, sensitivity 77.5%, specificity 56.7%, P < .001), respectively. In addition, VTs with cycle length less than 347 ms were more likely to be accelerated by burst stimulation with more pulse numbers (OR 3.31, P < .001).

Conclusions

Number of VT morphologies, VTCL, and mean variation in VTCL are risk factors predicting ATP acceleration. Burst stimulation with less pulse numbers should be performed in VTs with cycle length less than 347 ms.

The Significance of Shocks in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients

Large-scale implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) trials have unequivocally shown a reduction in mortality in appropriately selected patients with heart failure and depressed left ventricular function. However, there is a strong association between shocks and increased mortality in ICD recipients. It is unclear if shocks are merely a marker of a more severe cardiovascular disease or directly contribute to the increase in mortality. The aim of this review is to examine the relationship between ICD shocks and mortality, and explore possible mechanisms. Data examining the effect of shocks in the absence of spontaneous arrhythmias as well as studies of non-shock therapy and strategies to reduce shocks are analysed to try and disentangle the shocks versus substrate debate.

Management of pace-terminated ventricular arrhythmias

An implantable-cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) can terminate ventricular arrhythmias by delivering a shock or by antitachycardia pacing (ATP). The ATP works by capturing the excitable gap and disrupting re-entrant ventricular arrhythmias. Multiple studies have demonstrated that ATP is successful at terminating ventricular tachycardia (VT). Shocks from the ICD are associated with higher mortality. The data are conflicting about whether appropriate ATP is associated with higher mortality. In a patient with VT that is treated by ATP, the patient's guideline-based heart failure medications should be maximized. The use of VT ablation after appropriate and successful ATP requires additional studies.

The entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: initial clinical experience in a large Dutch cohort

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD).

BACKGROUND

A new entirely S-ICD has been introduced, that does not require lead placement in or on the heart. The authors report the largest multicenter experience to date with the S-ICD with a minimum of 1-year follow-up in the first 118 Dutch patients who were implanted with this device.

METHODS

Patients were selected if they had a class I or IIa indication for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. All consecutive patients from 4 high-volume centers in the Netherlands with an S-ICD implanted between December 2008 and April 2011 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 118 patients (75% males, mean age 50 years) received the S-ICD. After 18 months of follow-up, 8 patients experienced 45 successful appropriate shocks (98% first shock conversion efficacy). No sudden deaths occurred. Fifteen patients (13%) received inappropriate shocks, mainly due to T-wave oversensing, which was mostly solved by a software upgrade and changing the sensing vector of the S-ICD. Sixteen patients (14%) experienced complications. Adverse events were more frequent in the first 15 implantations per center compared with subsequent implantations (inappropriate shocks 19% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.03; complications 17% vs. 10%, p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the S-ICD is effective in terminating ventricular arrhythmias. There is, however, a considerable percentage of ICD related adverse events, which decreases as the therapy evolves and experience increases.

Rationale and design of the PRAETORIAN trial: a Prospective, RAndomizEd comparison of subcuTaneOus and tRansvenous ImplANtable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are widely used to prevent fatal outcomes associated with life-threatening arrhythmic episodes in a variety of cardiac diseases. These ICDs rely on transvenous leads for cardiac sensing and defibrillation. A new entirely subcutaneous ICD overcomes problems associated with transvenous leads. However, the role of the subcutaneous ICD as an adjunctive or primary therapy in patients at risk for sudden cardiac death is unclear.

STUDY DESIGN

The PRAETORIAN trial is an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, multicenter, prospective 2-arm trial that outlines the advantages and disadvantages of the subcutaneous ICD. Patients with a class I or IIa indication for ICD therapy without an indication for bradypacing or tachypacing are included. A total of 700 patients are randomized to either the subcutaneous or transvenous ICD (1:1). The study is powered to claim noninferiority of the subcutaneous ICD with respect to the composite primary endpoint of inappropriate shocks and ICD-related complications. After noninferiority is established, statistical analysis is done for potential superiority. Secondary endpoint comparisons of shock efficacy and patient mortality are also made.

CONCLUSION

The PRAETORIAN trial is a randomized trial that aims to gain scientific evidence for the use of the subcutaneous ICD compared with the transvenous ICD in a population of patients with conventional ICD with respect to major ICD-related adverse events. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with trial ID NCT01296022.

Pacing-induced spatiotemporal dynamics can be exploited to improve reentry termination efficacy

Some potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmias may be terminated by a series of premature stimuli. Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, which may be modeled as an excitation wave traveling around in a ring, is one such arrhythmia. We investigated the mechanisms and requirements for termination of such reentry using an ionic cardiac ring model. Termination requires conduction block, which in turn is facilitated by spatial dispersion in repolarization and recovery time. When applying short series of two or three stimuli, we found that for conduction block to robustly occur, the magnitude of the spatial gradient in recovery time must exceed a critical value of 20 ms/cm. Importantly, the required spatial gradient can be induced in this homogeneous system by the dynamics of the stimulus-induced waves-we show analytically the necessary conditions. Finally, we introduce a type of pacing protocol, the "aggressive ramp," which increases the termination efficacy by exploiting such pacing-induced heterogeneities. This technique, which is straightforward to implement, may therefore have important clinical implications.

A randomized study to compare ramp versus burst antitachycardia pacing therapies to treat fast ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the PITAGORA ICD trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is highly effective in terminating fast ventricular tachycardias (FVTs) and lowers the use of high-energy shocks, without increasing the risk of arrhythmia acceleration or syncope.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The aim of the PITAGORA ICD trial was to randomly compare 2 ATP strategies (88% coupling interval burst versus 91% coupling interval ramp, both 8 pulses) in terms of ATP efficacy, arrhythmia acceleration, and syncope. Two hundred six ICD patients (83% male, 67+/-11 years) were enrolled. FVT episodes with cycle lengths between 240 and 320 ms were treated by 1 ATP sequence and, in the event of failure, by shocks. Over a median follow-up of 36 months, 829 spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia episodes were detected in 79 patients. Episode review identified 595 episodes as true ventricular arrhythmias in 72 patients; devices classified 111 (18.7%) episodes as VF, 216 (36.3%) as FVT, and 268 (45.0%) as VT. Fifty-six patients had 214 treated FVT episodes-2 FVTs self-terminated before ATP release; 44 (79%) of these had at least 1 effective ATP intervention, and 34 (61%) were spared ICD shocks. Burst terminated 100 of 133 (75.2%) FVT episodes, whereas ramp terminated 44 of 81 (54.3%; P=0.015). Acceleration occurred in 9 of 214 (4.2%) FVT episodes treated: 6 episodes in 3 ramp patients and 3 episodes in 3 burst patients. Two patients-1 in each group-suffered 1 syncopal event associated to a nonterminated FVT episode.

CONCLUSIONS

Burst is significantly more efficacious than ramp in terminating FVT episodes. As the first therapy for FVT episodes, ATP carries a low risk of acceleration or syncopal events.

Predictors of ventricular tachycardia recurrence in 100 patients receiving tiered therapy defibrillators

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Programmed electrical stimulation (PES) is a time-honored diagnostic tool in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The response to PES can be used to assess efficacy of pharmacologic or electrical therapy, as well as to obtain prognostic information. Reproducible induction of ventricular tachycardia with invasive electrophysiologic testing, or stimulation through defibrillator lead systems, can help optimize antiarrhythmic drug therapy and device programming during clinical follow-up.

METHODS

We present our experience with 100 patients who had inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) during invasive PES at baseline, and received a third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) alone, or in combination with antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Noninvasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) was performed prior to hospital discharge in 61 patients.

RESULTS

The inducibility of SMVT was concordant between the invasive study and NIPS in a subgroup of 40 (82%) patients who had invasive PES on the same drug regimen. During a mean follow-up of 16 months, there were 12 nonarrhythmic deaths and recurrence of spontaneous SMVT in 36 (40%) of the surviving patients. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, the following variables were associated with early arrhythmia recurrence: persistent inducibility of SMVT during the NIPS session (relative risk 11, range 2.6-47); induction of SMVT with a cycle length > 280 ms during invasive baseline PES (2.5, 1.2-5) and presence of prior inferior myocardial infarction (2.1, 1-4.2). Timing to initial recurrence of spontaneous tachycardia was unaffected by other clinical variables or concomitant antiarrhythmic drug use.

CONCLUSION

Programmed electrical stimulation techniques offer insight into the patterns of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia recurrence and have significant practical utility in the management of patients receiving third-generation ICDs.

Development of device therapy for ventricular arrhythmias

The past 25 years have seen the implantable cardioverter defibrillator emerge as the treatment of choice for ventricular arrhythmias with reduction in size but increased therapeutic options. Understanding the complex mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias and defibrillation in normal and diseased hearts has been the focus of many research teams including that of John Uther at the Westmead Hospital Department of Cardiology. Marked improvements in capacitor and battery technologies, arrhythmia discrimination, pacing algorithms, shock waveforms and monitoring capabilities enable wider use and patient acceptance. Emergence of cardiac resynchronisation therapy and the implantable defibrillator for treatment of chronic heart failure is not only giving quality of life and extended survival for heart failure patients but has also cast new light on the evolution of heart failure.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock reduction using new antitachycardia pacing therapies

The main purpose of ICDs is to abort sudden death by delivering therapy at the moment of tachycardia. Shocks accomplish this goal but are painful. Alternatively antitachycardia pacing is painless and if deemed safe may be reasonable substitute. Multiple trials show a high efficacy rate by ATP (78-94%) for treating VTs below 200 bpm. ATP has had less efficacy for faster VTs (41-79%) and have higher probability of accelerating tachycardia (5-55%). The PainFREE trials address these issues. The first pilot study PainFREE Rx applied standardized VT detection and ATP regimen to 220 patients with 1100 spontaneous episodes of VT. ATP success for slow VT success was 92% and fast VT > 188 bpm raw success rate was 89%. None of these trials randomize shock versus ATP so comparative safety data was missing. Thus, the PainFREE Rx II trial was designed to make direct safety comparison between shock and ATP therapies for fast VT > 188 bpm. It included 634 patients with either ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy followed for 1 year yielding 1760 episodes of slow VT, fast VT plus VF. The results of the PainFREE Rx II trial showed that a single regimen of ATP, burst pace 8 pulses at 88% VT cycle length could safely terminate 77% of fast VT and 90% of slow VT. Consequently, shocks were reduced by 70% compared to the shock group. Furthermore, ATP was proven safe because there was no increase in sudden death, syncope or even arrhythmia acceleration compared to shock. The quality of life of the ATP group was found to be superior to the shock group validating ATP's intent. Secondary yet important findings also included the fact that by programming the ICD to wait for 18 beats in PainFREE Rx II before treating an episode reduced markedly the number of episodes treated when compared to 12 beat detection as done in PainFREE Rx I. Since syncope occurred in only 1% of episodes, the authors suggested that a longer wait for ICD detection needs to be evaluated.

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major healthcare problem worldwide. The majority of SCD events occur in patients with clinically recognized heart disease and most episodes result from ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy prevents SCD in specific patient populations. Significant progress in the design and technology has been made since the Food and Drug Administration first approved the ICD in 1985. First-generation ICDs were large, were implanted in the abdomen, required a thoracotomy for placing epicardial defibrillation patches, and were nonprogrammable. Contemporary ICDs have been substantially downsized, are implanted via a transvenous approach, and are multiprogrammable. Device implantation has been simplified to be similar to that of a permanent pacemaker. In addition to treating life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, ICDs now treat bradyarrhythmias, atrial arrhythmias, and congestive heart failure. The purpose of this article is to describe the evidence supporting the use of ICD therapy and to explain the current devices used in clinical practice.

Prospective randomized multicenter trial of empirical antitachycardia pacing versus shocks for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Pacing Fast Ventricular Tachycardia Reduces Shock Therapies (PainFREE Rx II) trial results

BACKGROUND

Successful antitachycardia pacing (ATP) terminates ventricular tachycardia (VT) up to 250 bpm without the need for painful shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients. Fast VT (FVT) >200 bpm is often treated by shock because of safety concerns, however. This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial compares the safety and utility of empirical ATP with shocks for FVT in a broad ICD population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We randomized 634 ICD patients to 2 arms-standardized empirical ATP (n=313) or shock (n=321)-for initial therapy of spontaneous FVT. ICDs were programmed to detect FVT when 18 of 24 intervals were 188 to 250 bpm and 0 of the last 8 intervals were >250 bpm. Initial FVT therapy was ATP (8 pulses, 88% of FVT cycle length) or shock at 10 J above the defibrillation threshold. Syncope and arrhythmic symptoms were collected through patient diaries and interviews. In 11+/-3 months of follow-up, 431 episodes of FVT occurred in 98 patients, representing 32% of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and 76% of those that would be detected as ventricular fibrillation and shocked with traditional ICD programming. ATP was effective in 229 of 284 episodes in the ATP arm (81%, 72% adjusted). Acceleration, episode duration, syncope, and sudden death were similar between arms. Quality of life, measured with the SF-36, improved in patients with FVT in both arms but more so in the ATP arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with shocks, empirical ATP for FVT is highly effective, is equally safe, and improves quality of life. ATP may be the preferred FVT therapy in most ICD patients.

Effect of elevated heart rate preceding the onset of ventricular tachycardia on antitachycardia pacing effectiveness in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

The incorporation of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) into implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) has provided a better tolerated alternative to shocks. ATP has been shown to be effective in terminating approximately 80% to 90% of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes. Although ATP is routinely used, little is known about predictors of ATP failure. Based on the evaluation of stored electrograms, we aimed to prospectively follow patients with ICDs, and to analyze parameters affecting ATP effectiveness. One hundred eighteen consecutive patients received ICDs for standard indications. Before discharge, empirical, standardized ATP therapy was programmed in all patients within VT zones. A total of 1,218 spontaneous tachycardia episodes occurred in 51 patients during a mean follow-up of 24.5 +/- 12 months. Among these, 888 VTs were diagnosed. One hundred four fast VTs were detected in the ventricular fibrillation zone and treated with primary shock delivery. ATP was attempted 881 times in the remaining 784 VT episodes. ATP terminated 640 VTs successfully, ATP failed in 55 VTs finally reverted by shocks, and 89 VTs converted to a slower VT outside the VT zone. Fifty-one of these slower VTs reverted spontaneously, and 38 were redetected and treated. Finally, in primary intention-to-treat basis, ATP was successful in 691 VTs (88%) and unsuccessful in 93 VTs (12%). There was no influence of VT cycle length on ATP success rate. Furthermore, ATP efficacy was similar between patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35% or >35%, between daytime and nighttime, as well as between patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. A faster heart rate immediately preceding the onset of VT (103 +/- 19 vs 78 +/- 14 beats/min, respectively, hazard ratio 4.08, 95% confidence interval 2.11 to 7.89, p <0.001), and absence of beta-blocker therapy (82% vs 93%, respectively, hazard ratio 2.71, 95% confidence interval 1.72 to 4.29, p = 0.02) were found, by Cox proportional-hazard analysis, to be the sole independent predictors of ATP ineffectiveness in ICD recipients. Thus, the present study identified both preceding sinus tachycardia (reflecting an increased sympathetic tone) and lack of beta-blocker use as independent risk factors for reduced success of ATP therapy in terminating VT. Therefore, modification of sympathetic tone may be beneficial for patients with ICDs.

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have evolved from the treatment of last resort to the gold standard therapy for patients at high risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. High-risk patients include those who have survived life-threatening arrhythmias, and individuals with cardiac diseases who are at risk for such arrhythmias, but are symptomless. Use of an ICD will affect the patient's quality of life. Some drugs can substantially affect defibrillator function and efficacy, and possible drug-device interactions should be considered. Patients with ICDs may encounter cell phones, antitheft detectors, and many other sources of potential electromagnetic Interference. In addition to treating ventricular tachyarrhythmias, new defibrillators provide full featured dual chamber pacing, and could treat atrial arrhythmias, and congestive heart failure by means of biventricular pacing.

Randomized, prospective comparison of four burst pacing algorithms for spontaneous ventricular tachycardia

"Less aggressive" burst stimulation is more effective in terminating spontaneous monomorphic ventricular tachycardia with a lesser acceleration rate. Higher ventricular tachycardia cycle length and use of 91% coupling interval were independent predictors for pacing termination.

Worldwide clinical experience with a down-sized active can implantable cardioverter defibrillator in 162 consecutive patients. Worldwide 7221 ICD Investigators

Treatment with an ICD is the first-line treatment for survivors of sudden cardiac death. More recently, evidence accumulates that prophylactic ICD therapy may be beneficial for selected subgroups of patients after myocardial infarction. Particularly for future studies on the value of prophylactic ICD therapy, downsized devices are needed to allow easy pectoral implantation with a single lead configuration and featuring extended memory capabilities. Accordingly, this study assesses the clinical performance of a downsized fourth-generation ICD in 162 consecutive patients. All devices could be successfully implanted pectorally, in 96% with a single lead configuration with a low defibrillation threshold of 10.6 +/- 5.2 J. During a 3-month follow-up, 26% of the patients received ICD therapy. Twenty percent had appropriate therapy for ventricular fibrillation (n = 9) and VT (n = 23), which was effective in all cases. Of the 450 episodes of VT, 426 were terminated by antitachycardia pacing. Fourteen patients (9%) had inappropriate ICD therapy mainly due to atrial fibrillation or sinus tachycardia, which could be reliably diagnosed by the ICD stored intracardiac electrograms.

Spontaneous ventricular tachycardia treated by antitachycardia pacing. Cadence Investigators

The database of the registry for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator was analyzed to determine the efficacy and safety of antitachycardia pacing for the termination of ventricular tachycardia. In 22,339 episodes treated, termination occurred in 94% and acceleration in only 1.4%.

Long-term follow-up of cardioverter-defibrillator implanted under conscious sedation in prepectoral subfascial position

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) with intravenous electrode systems and downsized generators can be implanted by use of operative techniques similar to those employed for the insertion of permanent pacemakers. However, the safety, efficacy, and long-term follow-up of simplified implantation procedures remain to be evaluated. This report is a prospective long-term evaluation of nonselected patients receiving ICDs in the prepectoral subfascial position under conscious sedation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical characteristics of the 231 consecutive patients included a mean age of 63 years, a male-to-female ratio of 6.4, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.34, a mild-to-moderate heart failure in 91%, coronary artery disease in 84%, and a history of aborted sudden cardiac death or refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Insertion of transvenous leads and prepectoral subfascial ICD implantation were performed in electrophysiology laboratories under local anesthesia and conscious sedation with intravenous midazolam and propofol. Successful implantation in all patients (operation time, 80 +/- 32 minutes, mean +/- SD) irrespective of body size and skin thickness was free of major complications, including need for emergency intubation. After surgery, 1 pocket hematoma, 1 seroma, and 1 pneumothorax required treatment. There was no operative or first-month mortality. During long-term follow-up averaging 453 +/- 296 days, six leads required repositioning, but pocket erosions or infections did not occur. First-year total survival was 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation under conscious sedation of ICDs in the prepectoral subfascial position is a safe and effective procedure with low operative and postoperative morbidity and favorable long-term outcome.

Antitachycardia pacing in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: how many attempts are useful?

The purpose of this study was to determine the termination and acceleration rates for 1 to 6 attempts of antitachycardia pacing [ATP] delivered by ICD in order to terminate spontaneously occurring VTs. Twenty-four ICD recipients with active ATP programs, including a maximum of six ATP sequences and spontaneously occurring VTs during follow-up, were investigated. During a mean follow-up of 42 +/- 15 months (range, 17-63 months) 413 spontaneous VT episodes (17 +/- 14; range, 1-49 per patient) resulting in appropriate ATP delivery by the ICD occurred. ATP successfully terminated 328 episodes (80%) with a mean number of 1.6 +/- 1.1 pacing sequences. Eighty episodes (19%) were accelerated by ATP and 5 (1%) were unresponsive to ATP. The ATP success decreased until the third ATP sequence (59%-->31%-->24%), but increased again in the fourth to sixth attempt (46%-->46%-->29%). The acceleration rate increased from sequence one to sequence three (8%-->13%-->28%), but decreased significantly in further ATP attempts (19%-->0%-->0%). The mean time delays until redetection or termination after 4, 5, and 6 attempts of ATP were 22 +/- 5 seconds, 37 +/- 2 seconds, and 41 +/- 9 seconds, respectively. Nine patients (37%) used > or = 3 ATP attempts during follow-up and all of them had a therapeutic benefit from it. Five out of 13 VTs (38%) treated with > or = 4 attempts could ultimately be terminated by ATP. The results of this study demonstrate that the first ATP sequence is the most effective and that > 4 ATP attempts may be useful in a minority of patients. There seems to be a low risk of VT acceleration by the fourth to sixth ATP sequence. Because of the associated time delay, a high number of ATP attempts should only be programmed in patients with hemodynamically well-tolerated stable VTs.

Antitachycardia pacing: which patients and which methods?

This article is a review on the value of antitachycardia pacing in patients with implantable cardiac-defibrillators (ICD). Antitachycardia pacing is highly effective in terminating monomorphic ventricular tachycardias, with a success rate of 80-90%. Which algorithm is used for termination seems to be of less importance, with respect to both efficacy and safety. Spontaneous episodes of ventricular tachycardia are slower and more easily convertible than those induced by programmed stimulation. It is thus possible that fine-tuning of the antitachycardia pacing algorithm, using induced episodes, is of limited value with respect to efficacy during follow-up. Prospective studies need to be performed to resolve this issue. Spontaneous monomorphic ventricular tachycardia can also occur in patients who are noninducible. Antitachycardia pacing should therefore also be considered for such patients. Inappropriate therapy, most often due to supraventricular arrhythmias, has been reported in up to 25% of patients. The sensitivity and specificity of algorithms developed to differentiate supraventricular from ventricular tachycardias still require validation.

Transvenous defibrillation lead systems

The use of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator has grown dramatically over the past 10 years. One of the major advances in defibrillation technology is the development of transvenous lead systems. Compared with traditional epicardial lead systems, transvenous defibrillation leads reduce perioperative mortality, hospitalization, and costs. Transvenous lead systems provide reliable sensing of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, although redetection of ventricular fibrillation can be prolonged, especially with integrated lead systems. Both ramp and burst adaptive pacing are equally effective for the termination of ventricular tachycardia and are successful in up to 90% of spontaneous events. Defibrillation thresholds are higher with transvenous leads than with epicardial patches. These thresholds are reduced with the use of multiple transvenous leads, subcutaneous patches, or with reversing shock polarity. However, the development of biphasic waveforms has made the largest impact on the efficacy of these lead systems, allowing dual coil transvenous systems to be effective in about 90% of patients. Defibrillation efficacy is further enhanced and implantation simplified by the incorporation of an active pulse generator located in the left pectoral region. Active pectoral pulse generators with biphasic waveforms will be the primary lead system for new implants.