Atrial Tachycardias Encountered during and after Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Part I: Classification, Incidence, Management

Neural network reconstruction of the left atrium using sparse catheter paths

PURPOSE

Catheter-based radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation has become the first line of treatment for atrial fibrillation in recent years. This requires a rather accurate map of the left atrial sub-endocardial surface including the ostia of the pulmonary veins, which requires dense sampling of the surface and currently takes more than 10 min. The focus of this work is to provide left atrial visualization early in the procedure to ease procedure complexity and enable further workflows, such as using catheters that have difficulty sampling the surface.

METHODS

We propose a dense encoder-decoder network with a novel regularization term to reconstruct the shape of the left atrium from partial data which is derived from simple catheter maneuvers. To train the network, we acquire a large dataset of 3D atria shapes and generate corresponding catheter trajectories, from which traversed point clouds are obtained. Once trained, we show that the suggested network can sufficiently approximate the atrium shape based on a given trajectory.

RESULTS

We compare several network solutions for the 3D atrium reconstruction. We demonstrate that the solution proposed produces realistic visualization using partial acquisition within a 3-min time interval using human clinical cases.

Atypical Atrial Flutter: Electrophysiological Characterization and Effective Catheter Ablation

Atrial flutter (AFL), defined as macro-re-entrant atrial tachycardia, is associated with debilitating symptoms, stroke, heart failure, and increased mortality. AFL is classified into typical, or cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent, and atypical, or non-CTI-dependent. Atypical AFL is a heterogenous group of re-entrant atrial tachycardias that most commonly occur in patients with prior heart surgery or catheter ablation. The ECG pattern is poorly predictive of circuit anatomy but may still provide mechanistic insight. AFL is difficult to manage medically and catheter ablation is the preferred treatment for most patients. Recent progress in technology and clinical electrophysiology has led to detailed characterization of re-entry circuits and effective ablation strategies. Combined activation and entrainment mapping are key to identifying the re-entry circuit. The presence of a slow-conducting isthmus, localized re-entry, dual-loop re-entry or bystander loops may lead to misleading activation maps but can be identified by electrogram examination and entrainment mapping. In the occasional patient without inducible AFL, substrate mapping in sinus rhythm may be a viable strategy. Long-term ablation success requires the creation of a transmural continuous lesion across a critical component of the re-entry circuit. Procedural endpoints include bidirectional conduction block across linear lesions and non-inducibility of atrial tachycardia. The present review discusses the epidemiology, mechanisms, ECG characteristics, electrophysiological characterization, and catheter ablation of atypical AFL.

Enlarged right atrium predicts pacemaker implantation after atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome

Introduction

Although catheter ablation (CA) of tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (TBS) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is considered to be an effective treatment strategy, pacemaker implantations (PMIs) are often required even after a successful CA. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical predictors of a PMI after CA.

Methods

From 2011 to 2020, 103 consecutive patients diagnosed with TBS were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Among the 103 patients, 54 underwent a PMI and 49 CA of AF. During 47.4 ± 35.4 months after 1.4 ± 0.6 CA sessions, 37 (75.5%) of 49 patients were free from atrial arrhythmia recurrences. PMIs were performed in 11 patients (PMI group) and the remaining 38 did not receive a PMI (non-PMI group).

Results

When comparing the PMI and non-PMI groups, there were no differences in the basic mean heart rate (P = 0.36), maximum pauses detected by 24-hour Holter-monitoring (P = 0.61), and other clinical parameters between the two groups while the right atrial area index was larger (42.1 ± 24.0 vs. 21.8 ± 8.4 cm2/m2 P = 0.002) in the PMI group than non-PMI group. The ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff point of the ratio of the right atrial area index to the left atrial area index for predicting a PMI following CA was 0.812 (Sensitivity 72.7%, specificity 71.1%, positive predictive value 42.1%, negative predictive value 90.0%, diagnostic accuracy 71.4%, AUC = 0.81).

Conclusion

Right atrial enlargement prior to CA was considered to be one of the risk factors for a PMI after CA of AF.

Atrial Tachycardias After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: How to Manage?

With catheter ablation becoming effective for non-pharmacological management of AF, many cases of atrial tachycardia (AT) after AF ablation have been reported in the past decade. These arrhythmias are often symptomatic and respond poorly to medical therapy. Post-AF-ablation ATs can be classified into the following three categories: focal, macroreentrant and microreentrant ATs. Mapping these ATs is challenging because of atrial remodelling and its complex mechanisms, such as double ATs and multiple-loop ATs. High-density mapping can achieve precise identification of the circuits and critical isthmuses of ATs and improve the efficacy of catheter ablation. The purpose of this article is to review the mechanisms, mapping and ablation strategy, and outcome of ATs after AF ablation.

Accuracy of implantable loop recorders for detecting atrial tachyarrhythmias after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

Background

Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) can provide an enhanced possibility to detect atrial fibrillation (AF), but the accuracy, especially the positive predictive value (PPV), is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ILRs for detecting AF through a comparison with Holter.

Method and results

Thirteen patients who underwent AF ablation were enrolled. ILRs were implanted in all patients, who were scheduled to have Holter monitorings after the procedure. The incidence of AF was compared between the two modalities and analyzed for any correlations. A total of 51 Holters (67,985.5 min) and concomitant ILRs were available for the comparison. The judgment of the presence of AF did not perfectly correlate between the ILR and Holter (Kappa = 0.866, P < 0.001). In the ILR data, the sensitivity of detecting AF on the Holter was 81.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.812–0.820; P < 0.001). The specificity was 99.9% (95% CI 0.998–0.999; P < 0.001). When the ILR detected AF, the PPV was 99.5% (95% CI 0.994–0.995), but the ILR did not detect AF, and the negative predictive value was 94.2% (95% CI 0.941–0.944). A separate analysis of AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) showed that the AT detection rate of the ILR was 2.3%.

Conclusion

The ILR had a low false positive value and high PPV for AF events. However, it was limited in identifying AT.

Comparison between novel and standard high-density 3D electro-anatomical mapping systems for ablation of atrial tachycardia

Ultra-high-density mapping allows very accurate characterization of circuits/mechanisms in atrial tachycardia (AT). Whether these advantages will translate into a better procedural or long-term clinical outcome is unknown. Sixty consecutive AT ablation procedures using ultra-high-density mapping (Rhythmia™, group 1) were retrospectively compared to 60 consecutive procedures using standard high-density mapping (Carto/NavX™, group 2) (total 209 AT, 79% left AT). A higher number of maps were performed in group 1 (4.8 ± 2.5 vs 3.2 ± 1.7, p = 0.0001) with similar acquisition duration (12 ± 5 vs 13 ± 6 min per map, p = ns), although with a greater number of activation points (10,543 ± 5854 vs 689 ± 1827 per map, p < 0.0001). AT location remained undetermined in 5 AT in group 1 vs 10 (p = 0.1). Mechanism remained undetermined in 5 AT from group 1 vs 11 (p = 0.06). Acute complete success was achieved in 77%, in both groups. At 1-year follow-up, AT recurred in 37% in group 1 vs 50% in group 2 (p = 0.046). There are less long-term recurrences after AT ablation using ultra-high-density mapping system compared to standard high-density 3D mapping, possibly because of a better comprehensive approach of AT mechanisms.

Which patients recur as atrial tachycardia rather than atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation?

INTRODUCTION

The ablation gaps have been known as the main mechanism of recurrence as atrial tachycardia (AT) rather than atrial fibrillation (AF) after AF catheter ablation. However, AF organization due to reduction of critical mass or focal trigger may also be the mechanism of AT recurrence. We sought to find out the main clinical factors of recurrence as AT rather than AF after AF ablation in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug effect.

METHODS

We analyzed 521 patients (70.8% men, 64.1% paroxysmal AF) who experienced AT or AF recurrence without antiarrhythmic drug effect during 44.7 ± 25.4 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 521 patients with recurrence, 42.0% (219 of 521) recurred with AT. The proportion of AT recurrence was not different between the pulmonary vein isolation only group and additional linear ablation group (45.1% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.128). The absence of hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.83, p = 0.007), small left atrial (LA) volume index (OR 0.89 per 10 mL/m2, 95% CI 0.79-1.00, p = 0.049), and high mean LA bipolar voltage (OR 2.03 per 1 mV, 95% CI 1.30-3.16, p = 0.002) were independently associated with AT recurrence, whereas additional linear ablation was not. Among 90 patients who underwent repeat ablation procedure, rates of PV reconnection (p = 0.358) and gap in prior linear ablations (p = 0.269) were not significantly different between AT recurrence group and AF recurrence group.

CONCLUSION

The degree of LA remodeling is significantly associated with recurrence as AT after AF ablation, irrespective of potential ablation gap in linear lesion.

A comparison between multipolar mapping and conventional mapping of atrial tachycardias in the context of atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Activation mapping can be challenging and time-consuming in patients with multiple atrial tachycardias (ATs).

AIMS

To compare multielectrode mapping using a dedicated mapping catheter - PentaRay (Biosense Webster Inc.) - and the conventional technique for mapping ATs in the context of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

METHODS

All procedures where PentaRay mapping of AT were used - after or during persistent AF ablation - were analysed. These were compared to a historical group - using conventional mapping.

RESULTS

A mean of 449±520 points within 14±6min were acquired per AT in the PentaRay group (n=17) versus 42±18 points (P<0.0001) within 33±25min (P=0.04) in the conventional group (n=17). All 25 AT isthmuses were easily identified and ablated in the PentaRay group (100%) versus 20/23 (87%) in the conventional group (P=0.056). The ablation time was shorter in the PentaRay group (760±540 vs 1347±962 s; P=0.037). However, procedure and fluoroscopy times were not significantly different between the PentaRay and conventional groups: 253±77 vs 267±73min (P=0.80) and 13.1±8.0min vs 15.1±10.0min (P=0.98), respectively. Recurrence occurred in less patients in the PentaRay group (0 vs 23.5%; P=0.033) during a mean follow-up of nearly 1 year.

CONCLUSION

In patients with multiple ATs, multielectrode PentaRay mapping was faster than the conventional technique, with less radiofrequency delivery and a better mid-term outcome.

Catheter ablation of atypical atrial flutter: a novel 3D anatomic mapping approach to quickly localize and terminate atypical atrial flutter

PURPOSE

This study aims to describe a novel method of High Density Activation Sequence Mapping combined with Voltage Gradient Mapping Overlay (HD-VGM) to quickly localize and terminate atypical atrial flutter.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients presenting with 26 different atypical atrial flutter circuits after a previous catheter or surgical AF ablation were studied. HD-VGM was performed with a commercially available impedance-based mapping system to locate and successfully ablate the critical isthmus of each tachycardia circuit. The results were compared to 21 consecutive historical control patients who had undergone an atypical flutter ablation without HD-VGM.

RESULTS

Twenty-six different atypical flutter circuits were evaluated. An average 3D anatomic mapping time of 12.39 ± 4.71 min was needed to collect 2996 ± 690 total points and 1016 ± 172 used mapping points. A mean of 195 ± 75 s of radiofrequency (RF) energy was needed to terminate the arrhythmias. The mean procedure time was 135 ± 46 min. With a mean follow-up 16 ± 9 months, 90% are in normal rhythm. In comparison to the control cohort, the study cohort had a shorter procedure time (135 ± 46 vs. 210 ± 41 min, p = 0.0009), fluoroscopy time (8.5 ± 3.7 vs. 17.7 ± 7.7 min, p = 0.0021), and success in termination of the arrhythmia during the procedure (100 vs. 68.2%, p = 0.0230).

CONCLUSIONS

Ablation of atypical atrial flutter is challenging and time consuming. This case series shows that HD-VGM mapping can quickly localize and terminate an atypical flutter circuit.

Occurrence of Focal Atrial Tachycardia During the Ablation Procedure Is Associated With Arrhythmia Recurrence After Termination of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Catheter ablation can terminate persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, atrial tachycardia (AT) often arises after termination of AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 215 patients who underwent index stepwise ablation for persistent AF, 141 (66%) patients (64 ± 9 years) in whom AF terminated during the ablation procedure were studied. If AF converted into AT, ablation for AT was subsequently performed. ATs were categorized as focal or macroreentrant AT. We assessed whether type of AT occurring after conversion of AF during the ablation procedure was associated with freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF or AT) during follow-up. Sinus rhythm was directly restored from AF in 37 patients, while 34, 37, and 33 patients had focal AT alone, a mix of focal and macroreentrant AT, and macroreentrant AT alone after termination of AF, respectively. Arrhythmia-free survival rates at 1 year after the index procedure were 30%, 34%, 61%, and 59% in the patients with focal AT alone, a mix of focal AT and macroreentrant AT, macroreentrant AT alone, and direct restoration of sinus rhythm, respectively (P = 0.004). Type of AT occurring during the index procedure was associated with type of recurrent AT (P = 0.03), but the origin of focal AT occurring during the index ablation differed from that of the recurrent AT in 85% of patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients who had AF termination by ablation, occurrence of focal AT during the ablation procedure was associated with worse clinical outcome than occurrence of macroreentrant AT, likely due to ATs arising from other foci during follow-up.

Recurrence of Atrial Arrhythmias Despite Persistent Pulmonary Vein Isolation After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Case Series

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to categorize arrhythmia mechanisms and to summarize ablation strategies in patients with persistent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) at the time of redo procedures.

BACKGROUND

Persistent PVI is more frequently seen in patients undergoing redo procedures for recurrent atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent their first AF ablation procedures at Brigham and Women's Hospital were screened and included if they had persistent isolation of all pulmonary veins at the time of redo procedures.

RESULTS

Of 300 consecutive patients undergoing first AF ablation procedures, redo procedures were performed in 63 (21%), and 26 patients (9%) had persistent PVI. Of those, 11 had recurred with AF and 15 with organized atrial tachycardia (AT). During the index procedure, linear ablation was performed in 46% of patients with recurrent AF and 93% with recurrent organized AT (p = 0.020). At the time of last follow-up, 2 of 10 patients (20%) in the AF group and 10 of 15 patients (67%) in AT group were in sinus rhythm, without class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with recurrence of atrial arrhythmia despite persistent PVI frequently present with organized AT. Linear ablation during the index procedure is associated with recurrence of organized AT. Recurrence rates after redo procedures were higher if patients had recurrent AF after the index procedure, and these patients often presented with AF again. Patients with recurrent AF despite persistent PVI may represent a population with lower success rates of catheter ablation.

Contemporary approaches to persistent atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently the most commonly treated cardiac arrhythmia. It is generally a progressive disease, often more difficult to control as electromechanical remodeling alters the underlying substrate. Patients typically evolve from infrequent, self-terminating episodes, to more frequent and sustained events. In addition, atrial remodeling may make sinus rhythm more challenging to achieve. Although an ablation strategy limited to pulmonary vein isolation may be curative in those with paroxysmal AF, a more extensive approach is often required in those with persistent AF. This article discusses the current approaches and most recent advances in the ablation of persistent and long-standing persistent AF.

2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

This is a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS), and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). This is endorsed by the governing bodies of the ACC Foundation, the AHA, the ECAS, the EHRA, the STS, the APHRS, and the HRS.

Incidence, characteristics, and outcome of left atrial tachycardias after circumferential antral ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for treatment of atrial fibrillation may induce left atrial tachycardias (ATs).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence, time course of occurrence, mechanisms, and correlation with the electrocardiogram as well as the outcome of ablation of these tachycardias.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Out of the 839 patients who underwent circumferential antral radiofrequency PVI guided by a circumferential pulmonary vein catheter at our institution between February 2005 and April 2011, 35 patients (4%) developed AT during follow-up. Six patients with left AT and a previous PVI at other institutions were also included. Of these 41 patients (26 men, 63%; age 59 ± 10 years), 26 (63%) had underlying paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 15 (37%) had persistent atrial fibrillation. AT ablation was performed 47 ± 60 weeks after initial PVI, within the first 3 months in 16 patients (39%). The tachycardia mechanism was focal in 15 patients (37%), macroreentry in 25 patients (61%), and undetermined in 1 (2%). Focal tachycardias had an isoelectric line between distinct P waves in 13 of the 15 patients (87%), while only 4 (16%) with a macroreentrant mechanism had an isoelectric line (P <.001). Although difficult to measure, a P-wave width of >140 ms had the highest sensitivity and specificity to identify macroreentrant mechanism. Ablation was acutely successful in 32 patients (78%) and not successful in 4 (10%). In 5 patients, success could not be determined as the tachycardia terminated or degenerated during mapping. During a mean follow-up of 31 ± 17 months, 11 patients (27%; n = 9 [82%] with macroreentry) underwent repeat ablation procedure for AT. Eight patients had true recurrence, for example, the same AT, and 3 patients had a second mechanism of AT.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of an identical ablation protocol, it was found that approximately 4% of the patients developed AT after mere circumferential antral PVI. The majority of ATs developed within a few months after ablation but occurred as late as several years after the initial PVI. Macroreentry was more frequent than a focal mechanism. Broad P waves and isoelectric lines between P waves help to distinguish a focal mechanism from a macroreentrant mechanism. Ablation has a high acute success rate, and AT recurrence occurs predominantly in macroreentrant AT.

Late atrial tachycardia following pulmonary vein isolation: analysis of successful discrete ablation sites

BACKGROUND

The role of additional left atrial linear lesions performed during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to prevent atrial tachycardias (ATs) is not yet clear.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse successful ablation sites of late-onset post-PVI AT, and to understand whether additional ablation lines at mitral isthmus and left atrium (LA) roof could have been useful in preventing these jatrogenic ATs.

METHODS

From March, 2002 to August, 2008, 366 patients underwent PVI alone for drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Twenty-six (7.1%) of these patients developed late AT during follow-up, and were referred for ablation. Successful discrete ablation sites were analysed. In no patient the index AT was terminated by a linear lesion in mitral isthmus or LA roof.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven ATs were mapped; mean CL was 261 ± 71.6 ms. In 3/26 patients (11.5%), mapping was unsuccessful, while 23/26 (88.5%) patients underwent a successful procedure (24 AT morphologies in 23 patients - 3/24 were mapped as mitral isthmus, and 1/24, as LA roof-dependent AT). Among the 24 successfully mapped ATs, 17/24 (70.8%) displayed a macroreentrant activation and the remaining 7/24 (29.1%), a focal pattern. Finally, in 22/26 (84.6%) patients, ATs were no more inducible. At a mean f/u of 22.4 ± 12.2 months, 23/26 (88.4%) patients remained AT-free (antiarrhythmic drugs prescribed in 5/26, 19.2% patients for AF prevention).

CONCLUSIONS

In our case series, less than one-fifth of late-onset post-PVI ATs were mapped as mitral isthmus- or LA roof-dependent circuits.

Organized atrial tachycardias after atrial fibrillation ablation

The efficacy of catheter-based ablation techniques to treat atrial fibrillation is limited not only by recurrences of this arrhythmia but also, and not less importantly, by new-onset organized atrial tachycardias. The incidence of such tachycardias depends on the type and duration of the baseline atrial fibrillation and specially on the ablation technique which was used during the index procedure. It has been repeatedly reported that the more extensive the left atrial surface ablated, the higher the incidence of organized atrial tachycardias. The exact origin of the pathologic substrate of these trachycardias is not fully understood and may result from the interaction between preexistent regions with abnormal electrical properties and the new ones resultant from radiofrequency delivery. From a clinical point of view these atrial tachycardias tend to remit after a variable time but in some cases are responsible for significant symptoms. A precise knowledge of the most frequent types of these arrhythmias, of their mechanisms and components is necessary for a thorough electrophysiologic characterization if a new ablation procedure is required.

Current ablation strategies for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of cardiac and overall mortality. Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm is of paramount importance if it can be accomplished without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs. Catheter ablation has evolved into a well-established treatment option for patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory AF. Ablation strategies which target the pulmonary veins are the cornerstone of AF ablation procedures, irrespective of the AF type. Ablation strategies in the setting of persistent and long-standing persistent AF are more complex. Many centers follow a stepwise ablation approach including pulmonary vein antral isolation as the initial step, electrogram-based ablation at sites exhibiting complex fractionated atrial electrograms, and linear lesions. Up to now, no single strategy is uniformly effective in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF. The present study reviewed the efficacy of the current ablation strategies for persistent and long-standing persistent AF.

Pulmonary vein isolation alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: an ablation strategy facilitated by antiarrhythmic drug induced reverse remodeling

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone has been thought to be insufficient in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). We hypothesized that preablation treatment of PersAF with a potent antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) would facilitate reverse atrial remodeling and result in high procedural efficacy after PVI alone.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-one consecutive patients (59.4 ± 9.8 years) with PersAF and prior AAD failure were treated with oral dofetilide (768 ± 291 mcg/day) for a median of 85 days pre-PVI. P-wave duration (Pdur) on ECG was used to assess reverse atrial remodeling. Thirty-five patients with paroxysmal (P) AF not treated with an AAD served as controls. All patients underwent PVI alone; dofetilide was discontinued 1-3 mos postablation. In the PersAF patients, the Pdur decreased from 136.3 ± 21.7 ms (assessed postcardioversion on dofetilide) to 118.6 ± 20.4 ms (assessed immediately prior to PVI) (P < 0.001). In contrast, no change in Pdur (122.6 ± 11.5 ms vs. 121.3 ± 13.7 ms, P = NS) was observed in PAF patients. The 6 and 12 mos AAD-free response to ablation was 76% and 70%, respectively, in PersAF patients, similar to the 80% and 75%, response in PAF patients (P = NS). A decline in Pdur in response to dofetilide was the only predictor of long-term clinical response to PVI in patients with PersAF.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-treatment with AAD resulted in a decrease in Pdur suggesting reverse atrial electrical remodeling in PersAF patients. This may explain the excellent clinical outcomes using PVI alone, and may suggest an alternative ablation strategy for PersAF.

The modified anterior line: an alternative linear lesion in perimitral flutter

INTRODUCTION

Ablation of left atrial flutter (LAF) is often limited by the need for technically demanding linear lesions. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new modified anterior line (MAL), connecting the anterior/anterolateral mitral annulus with the left superior pulmonary vein for ablation of perimitral flutter.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MAL was performed in 65 patients (15 females, age 63.6 +/- 9.8 years) with perimitral flutter using 3D mapping systems (70.8% Carto, 29.2% NavX). Perimitral flutter was either the presenting arrhythmia (73.8%) or an intermediate organized rhythm during atrial fibrillation ablation. Follow-up included repetitive 7-day Holter with 93.8% of patients off antiarrhythmics. MAL was acutely effective in 63/65 patients (96.9%). Termination to sinus rhythm occurred in 36 of 65 patients (55.4%), and in 27 of 65 patients (41.5%) there was a change to another LAF type. Bidirectional block across the MAL was achieved in 56 of 65 patients (86.1%). After 6 months of follow-up, 20 of 41 patients (48.8%) had a LAF recurrence, with 6 patients undergoing a reablation. In all redo patients the MAL was still complete and LAF mechanism was different to the initially targeted. No major complication occurred during the ablation procedures or in the postablation period.

CONCLUSION

The MAL is a safe and effective linear lesion for the treatment of perimitral LAF. Its value compared to more established linear lesions as the mitral isthmus line has to be evaluated in larger studies.

Ablation strategies for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation remains the most common arrhythmia in the USA and is associated with an increased risk for stroke, congestive heart failure and overall mortality. There has been a tremendous advance in the field of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation that has resulted in better outcomes for patients. The approach for ablation of atrial fibrillation can be different depending on patients' presentation of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Pulmonary vein isolation remains the cornerstone of any ablation strategy for atrial fibrillation; however, further ablation, end points of the procedure, clinical end points for successful ablation and appropriate follow-up remain controversial. We aim to discuss these different approaches and the major controversies in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.