Early recurrences after atrial fibrillation ablation: prognostic value and effect of early reablation

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Long-term clinical impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after cryoballoon ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

The impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) within the 90-day blanking period on long-term outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is controversial. This study aimed to assess the relationship between ERAT and late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (LRAT) post-CBA.

METHODS

Utilizing data from a multicenter registry in Korea (May 2018 to June 2022), we analyzed the presence and timing of ERAT (<30, 30-60, and 60-90 days) and its association with LRAT risk after CBA. LRAT was defined as any recurrence of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting more than 30 s beyond the 90 days.

RESULTS

Out of 2636 patients, 745 (28.2%) experienced ERAT post-CBA. Over an average follow-up period of 21.2 ± 10.3 months, LRAT was observed in 874 (33.1%) patients. Patients with ERAT had significantly lower 1-year LRAT freedom compared to those without ERAT (42.6% vs. 85.5%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis identified ERAT as a potential predictor of LRAT, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.47-4.57). Significant associations were noted across all examined time frames (HR, 3.84; 95% CI, 3.32-4.45 in <30 days, HR, 5.53; 95% CI, 4.13-7.42 in 30-60 days, and HR, 4.29; 95% CI, 3.12-5.89 in 60-90 days). This finding was consistently observed across all types of AF.

CONCLUSION

ERAT during the 90-day blanking period strongly predicts LRAT in AF patients undergoing CBA, indicating a need to reconsider the clinical significance of this period.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Early atrial fibrillation recurrence post catheter ablation: Analysis from insertable cardiac monitor in the era of optimized radiofrequency ablation

BACKGROUND

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) is associated with ablation-induced proarrhythmogenic inflammation; however, existing studies used intermittent monitoring or nonoptimized radiofrequency (RF) applications (noncontiguous or without ablation index target value).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between ERAT and late recurrence based on insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) data.

METHODS

We compiled data from Close-To-Cure and Close Maze studies, which enrolled patients who underwent RF ablation for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). All patients were implanted with an ICM 2-3 months before ablation.

RESULTS

We studied 165 patients (104 with paroxysmal AF, 61 with persistent AF). Over the 1-year follow-up period, 41 of the patients experienced late recurrence. The risk of late recurrence was higher in patients experiencing ERAT (hazard ratio [HR] 6.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0-13.0), with negative and positive predictive values of 90.5% and 45.7%, respectively. Median burden of AF during the blanking period was significantly higher in patients with late recurrence (7.9% [0.0%-99.6%]) compared to those without recurrence (0.0% [0.0%-6.0]; P <.001). For each 1% increase in AF burden during the blanking period, late recurrence increased by 4.6% (HR 1.046; 95% CI 1.035-1.059). The best tradeoff for predicting AF from ERAT occurrence was AF burden of 0.6% and last ERAT at 64 days.

CONCLUSION

In patients ablated for paroxysmal and persistent AF with a durable RF lesion set and implanted with a continuous monitoring device, postablation early AF recurrence and burden significantly predict late recurrence. The post-AF ablation blanking period should be reduced to 2 months.

Repeat catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established therapy that reduces AF burden, improves quality of life, and reduces the risks of cardiovascular outcomes. Although there are clear guidelines for the application of de novo catheter ablation, there is less evidence to guide recommendations for repeat catheter ablation in patients who experience recurrent AF. In this review, we examine the rationale for repeat ablation, mechanisms of recurrence, patient selection, optimal timing, and procedural strategies. We discuss additional important considerations, including treatment of comorbidities and risk factors, risk of complications, and effectiveness. Mechanisms of recurrent AF are often due to non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) triggers; however, there is insufficient evidence supporting the routine use of empiric lesion sets during repeat ablation. The emergence of pulsed field ablation may alter the safety and effectiveness of de novo and repeat ablation. Extrapolation of data from randomized trials of de novo ablation does not optimally inform efficacy in cases of redo ablation. Additional large, randomized controlled trials are needed to address important clinical questions regarding procedural strategies and timing of repeat ablation.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, significantly impacting patients' quality of life and increasing the risk of death, stroke, heart failure, and dementia. Over the past two decades, there have been significant breakthroughs in AF risk prediction and screening, stroke prevention, rhythm control, catheter ablation, and integrated management. During this period, the scale, quality, and experience of AF management in China have greatly improved, providing a solid foundation for the development of guidelines for the diagnosis and management of AF. To further promote standardized AF management, and apply new technologies and concepts to clinical practice in a timely and comprehensive manner, the Chinese Society of Cardiology of the Chinese Medical Association and the Heart Rhythm Committee of the Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering have jointly developed the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation. The guidelines have comprehensively elaborated on various aspects of AF management and proposed the CHA2DS2-VASc-60 stroke risk score based on the characteristics of AF in the Asian population. The guidelines have also reevaluated the clinical application of AF screening, emphasized the significance of early rhythm control, and highlighted the central role of catheter ablation in rhythm control.

Smartphone AF Burden During the Blanking Period Predicts Catheter Ablation Outcomes: Insights From DECAAF II

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence during the blanking period is under investigated. With the rise of smartphone-based electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring, there's potential for better prediction and understanding of AF recurrence trends.

OBJECTIVES

In this study the authors hypothesize that AF burden derived from a single-lead Smartphone ECG during the blanking period predicts recurrence of atrial arrhythmias after ablation.

METHODS

630 patients with persistent AF undergoing ablation were included from the DECAAF II (Effect of MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) trial. Patients recorded daily ECG strips using a smartphone device. AF burden was defined as the ratio of ECG strips with AF to the total number of strips submitted. The primary outcome was the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia.

RESULTS

Recurrence occurred in 301 patients during the 18-month follow-up period. In patients who developed recurrent arrhythmia after 90 days of follow-up, AF burden during the blanking period was significantly higher when compared with patients who remained in sinus rhythm (31.3% vs 7.5%; P < 0.001). AF burden during the blanking period was an independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence (HR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.36-1.47; P < 0.001). Through grid searching, an AF burden of 18% best discriminates between recurrence and no-recurrence groups, yielding a C-index of 0.748. After a follow-up period of 18 months, recurrence occurred in 33.7% of patients (147 of 436) with an AF burden <18% and in 79.4% of patients (154 of 194) with an AF burden >18% (HR: 4.57; 95% CI: 3.63-5.75; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A high AF burden derived from a smartphone ECG during the blanking period is a strong predictor of atrial arrhythmia recurrences after ablation.

Identifying the prognostic significance of early arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and the optimal blanking period duration: insights from the DECAAF II study

OBJECTIVE

Early atrial arrhythmia recurrence following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is common. Current guidelines promulgate a 3-month blanking period. We hypothesize that early atrial arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period may predict longer-term ablation outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 688 patients with persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation were included in the DECAAF II trial database. The primary endpoint of the study was the first confirmed recurrence of atrial arrhythmia. Recurrence was also monitored during the 90-day blanking period. A total of 287 patients experienced recurrent atrial arrhythmia during the blanking period, while 401 remained in sinus rhythm. Rates of longer-term arrhythmia recurrence were substantially higher among those who developed recurrence during the blanking period compared to those who remained in sinus rhythm throughout the blanking period (68% vs. 32%, P < 0.001). The study cohort was divided into three groups according to the timing of arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period. Of those who had recurrent arrhythmia during the first month of the blanking period (Group 1), 43.9% experienced longer-term recurrence, compared to 61.6% who recurred during the second month of the blanking period (Group 2), and 93.3% of those who had arrhythmia recurrence during the third month (Group 3, P < 0.001). The risk of recurrent arrhythmia was highest in Group 3 (HR = 10.15), followed by Group 2 (HR = 2.35) and Group 1 (HR = 1.5). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the relationship between the timing of arrhythmia recurrence and the primary outcome (AUC = 0.746, P < 0.001). The optimal blanking period duration was identified as 34 days. Atrial fibrillation burden determined by smartphone electrocardiogram technology over the 18 months follow-up period was significantly higher in Group 3 (29%) compared to Groups 1 (6%) and 2 (7%) and in patients who stayed in sinus rhythm during the blanking period (5%) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Early atrial arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period, particularly during the third month, is significantly associated with later recurrence. Although a blanking period is warranted, it should be abbreviated.

Premature atrial contraction immediately after catheter ablation was associated with late recurrence of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Although premature atrial contractions (PACs) just after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) are common, their clinical significance is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether the PAC burden after an initial CA for AF was associated with late recurrence.

METHODS

We enrolled 346 patients with AF (median age, 65 years; 30% female; 57% with paroxysmal AF) who underwent an initial radiofrequency CA and a 24-h Holter monitoring the day after the procedure. PAC was defined as supraventricular complexes occurring ≥30% earlier than expected compared with a previous RR interval, and the number of PAC/24 h during post-procedural Holter monitoring was analyzed.

RESULTS

AF recurred in 106 patients (31%) during a median follow-up of 19 months. These patients had significantly more PAC/24 h than those without (median [interquartile range], 891 [316-4351] beats vs. 409 [162-1,303] beats; p < 0.01). The number of PACs was independently associated with AF recurrence after adjustment for clinical parameters and left atrial (LA) enlargement. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that 1431 PAC/24 h was the optimal cut-off value for predicting AF recurrence. Adding the PAC/24 h to the prediction model with LA diameter appeared to correctly reclassify patients who were thought to be at high risk for AF recurrence into the low-risk group and vice versa.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of PACs was an independent risk factor for AF recurrence. A 24-h Holter recording the day after an initial CA is a simple and beneficial tool for the risk stratification of AF recurrence.

The blanking period after atrial fibrillation ablation: an European Heart Rhythm Association survey on contemporary definition and management

The use of a blanking period (BP) after an atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure is a common practice, but recent data questions the benign nature of early recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ERATs). A physician-based survey was carried out by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) to investigate the current definition and applicability of BP and ERAT management. An online questionnaire was sent to clinical and interventional electrophysiologists. A total of 436 respondents (88% interventional electrophysiologists) reported observing ERATs in 25% (interquartile range 15-35) of patients, less commonly in paroxysmal AF (PAF) compared with persistent AF (persAF). The median reported duration of BP used by respondents was 90 days, with 22% preferring a shorter BP duration for PAF patients compared with persAF. Half of the patients with ERATs are expected to also experience late recurrences (LR). Isolated episodes of ERATs are treated conservatively by 99% of the respondents, but repeat ablation during the BP is preferred by 20% of electrophysiologists for multiple ERATs and by 16% in patients with organized atrial tachyarrhythmias. In conclusion, ERATs are commonly observed after AF ablation, particularly in persAF patients, and are perceived as predictors of LR by half of the respondents. A general adherence to a 90-day BP duration was observed. During this time period, ERAT is mainly treated conservatively, but repeat ablation during the BP is occasionally offered to patients with multiple ERATs and those with organized atrial tachyarrhythmias.

Impact of atrial fibrillation recurrences during the blanking period following catheter ablation on long-term arrhythmia-free survival: a prospective study with continuous monitoring

BACKGROUND

The significance of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences during the 90-day blanking period following catheter ablation is controversial. Studies to date examining the impact of AF recurrences during the blanking period have been limited by intermittent monitoring. We sought to test whether AF recurrences during the blanking period are associated with long-term recurrences using continuous monitoring.

METHODS

Patients undergoing AF ablation by a single operator at an academic medical center between 2015 and 2019, who either already had a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) with an atrial lead or received an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM), were followed for long-term AF recurrence. Recurrence was defined as > 30 s by CIED and > 2 min by ICM. All device-reported AF episodes were adjudicated by a physician.

RESULTS

Of 196 consecutive patients, 51 (26%) had AF recurrence in the blanking period and 145 (74%) did not. Over the year following ablation, those who had an AF recurrence in the blanking period were significantly more likely to have long-term AF recurrences than those without AF in the blanking period (log rank p < 0.001). The higher the burden of AF recurrences during the blanking period, the more likely AF was to recur long-term (hazard ratio 1.04 [CI 1.01-1.06] per 1% increase in burden, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Using continuous monitoring of a sizable population, we confirmed that AF recurrences in the blanking period following ablation are in fact associated with long-term AF recurrences. The higher the burden of recurrence, the more likely AF is to recur long-term.

Early arrhythmia recurrence after cryoballoon ablation in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Early arrhythmia recurrence within the three-month blanking period is a common event that historically has been attributed to reversible phenomena. While its' mechanistic links remain obscure, accumulating evidence support the argument of shortening the blanking period. We aimed to elucidate the association between early and late arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation cryoablation.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database, ClinicalTrials.gov, medRxiv and Cochrane Library were searched for studies evaluating early and late arrhythmia recurrence rates in patients undergoing cryoablation for AF. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The primary endpoint was late arrhythmia recurrence.

RESULTS

Early arrhythmia recurrence was found predictive of decreased arrhythmia-free survival after evaluating 3975 patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent cryoablation (OR: 5.31; 95% CI: 3.75-7.51). This pattern remained unchanged after sub-analyzing atrial fibrillation type (paroxysmal; OR: 7.16; 95% CI: 4.40-11.65 and persistent; OR: 7.63; 95% CI: 3.62-16.07) as well as cryoablation catheter generation (first generation; OR: 5.15, 95% CI: 2.39-11.11 and advanced generation; OR: 5.83, 95% CI: 3.68-9.23). Studies permitting anti-arrhythmic drug utilization during blanking period or examining early recurrence as a secondary outcome were found to be a significant source of statistical heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that early arrhythmia recurrence is predictive of late outcomes after cryoablation for atrial fibrillation. Identifying which patients deserve earlier re-intervention is an open research avenue. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Early arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: is it predictive for late recurrence?

BACKGROUND

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) is common after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF), but its clinical significance in patients with persistent AF remains unclear. We sought to determine the predictive value of ERAT for rhythm outcome after RFCA for persistent AF.

METHODS

The study included 207 consecutive patients (mean age 66.4 ± 10.7 years, male 66.2%) with persistent and long-standing persistent AF undergoing de novo pulmonary vein isolation (± atrial substrate ablation). All patients remained off antiarrhythmic drugs. ERAT was defined as any atrial arrhythmia ≥ 30 s occurring within the first 30 days. Late recurrence (LR) was determined during follow-up visits scheduled 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-ablation using 7-day Holter ECGs.

RESULTS

ERAT occurred in 143/207 (69.1%) patients as AF (60%) or atrial tachycardia (40%) and was persistent in 82% of cases. During a median follow-up of 22.2 months, LR occurred significantly more often in patients with ERAT than in patients without ERAT (92.3 vs. 43.8%, P < 0.001). The only independent predictors for LR were ERAT (OR 16.8, 95% CI 6.184-45.797, P < 0.001) and intraprocedural termination to sinus rhythm (OR 0.052, 95% CI 0.003-0.851, P = 0.038). Extending the blanking period from 30 to 90 days did not impact LR rates.

CONCLUSION

ERAT following ablation of persistent AF is strongly associated with late arrhythmia recurrence, which challenges the assumption that ERAT represents merely a transient phenomenon. While limiting the blanking period to 30 days seems justified, the benefit of early re-ablations remains to be addressed in future studies.

Clinical impact of very early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

Little has been reported on the impact of very early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (VERAF) after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

METHODS

We enrolled 201 consecutive patients who underwent an initial RFCA of atrial fibrillation (AF) between September 2014 and April 2019 in our hospital and experienced early recurrence of AF (ERAF, defined as recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia within 3 months after RFCA). These patients were categorized into three groups: Group A who experienced recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia only within 48 h after RFCA, Group B who experienced recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia both within 48 h and between 48 h and 3 months after RFCA, and Group C who experienced the first recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia between 48 h and 3 months after RFCA. We compared the patient characteristics, ablation procedure and procedure-related complications, and clinical outcomes among the three groups. In addition, we investigated the pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections in the patients who experienced a repeat ablation procedure due to late recurrence of AF (LRAF, defined as recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia between 3 and 12 months after RFCA).

RESULTS

The Group A, B, and C consisted of 54, 40, and 107 patients, respectively. The inflammatory markers on the second day of RFCA were significantly higher in Group A. Moreover, Group A had a lower incidence of LRAF (p < 0.001) and PV reconnections at repeat ablation procedure (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

VERAF may have better clinical outcomes including lower incidence of LRAF and PV reconnections among patients with ERAF.

Prevalence and outcome of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias in the Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) study

BACKGROUND

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) is common after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and has been associated with an increased risk of late atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and outcomes of patients experiencing ERAT after PVI using advanced-generation ablation technologies.

METHODS

This is a prespecified substudy of the CIRCA-DOSE (Cryoballoon vs Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Double-Short vs Standard Exposure Duration) trial, a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing PVI with contact force-guided radiofrequency ablation to secondary-generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF. All study patients received an implantable cardiac monitor to allow continuous rhythm monitoring. ERAT was defined as any recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia within the first 90 days after AF ablation.

RESULTS

ERAT occurred in 61% of the 346 patients at a median of 12 days (range 1-90 days) after ablation. ERAF was a significant predictor of late recurrence (60.1% with ER vs 25.9% without ER; P <.001) and symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia (31.6% with ERAF vs 6.7% without ERAF; P <.001). Receiver operating curve analyses revealed a strong correlation between ERAT timing and burden and late recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified ER timing (hazard ratio [HR] 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-5.95; P = .004) and burden (HR 1.05 per 1% ER burden; 95% CI 1.04-1.07; P <.001) as strong independent predictors of late recurrence. Incidence rate, timing, burden, and prognostic significance of ER did not differ between the study groups.

CONCLUSION

ERAT remains common after PVI despite use of advanced-generation ablation technologies. Early AF recurrence beyond 3 weeks after ablation is associated with increased risk of late recurrence.

Effect of electrical cardioversion on 1-year outcomes in patients with early recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence is common in the 3‐month blanking‐period after catheter ablation, during which electrical cardioversion (ECV) is usually performed to restore sinus rhythm. Whether ECV can affect the clinical outcome of post‐ablation AF patients is inconsistent, however. We aimed to explore the 1‐year effect of ECV on AF recurrence and rehospitalization in patients experienced recurrence within 3‐month after AF catheter ablation.

Methods

Patients who experienced recurrence within 3‐month after AF catheter ablation procedure were enrolled from the China Atrial Fibrillation Registry (China‐AF). A 1:3 Propensity score matching (PSM) method was applying to adjust the confounders between patients who had been treated by ECV or not. Logistic regression models were conducted to evaluate the association of ECV with 1‐year AF recurrence and rehospitalization.

Results

In this study, 2961 patients experienced AF recurrence within 3‐month after the procedure, and 282 of them underwent successful ECV, 2155 patients did not undergo ECV. One‐year AF recurrence rates were 56.4% in ECV group versus 65.4% in non‐ECV group (p = .003), and were 55.9% versus 65.9%, respectively, after PSM (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.88, p = .005). However, the difference of 1‐year rehospitalization rates between two groups were not statistically significant before (ECV group: 23.7% vs. non‐ECV group: 22.3%, p = .595) and after PSM (ECV group: 24.4% vs. non‐ECV group: 21.6%, adjusted OR1.14; 95% CI 0.81–1.62, p = .451).

Conclusions

Successful ECV was associated with lower rate of one‐year recurrence in patients with early recurrent AF after catheter ablation.

Association between early recurrences of atrial tachyarrhythmias and long-term outcomes in patients after repeat atrial fibrillation ablation

Purpose

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ER) is predictive of late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (LR) after first-time atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but the association in patients undergoing repeat AF ablation is unknown. We aim to determine the incidence and prognostic significance of ER after repeat ablation.

Methods

A total of 259 consecutive patients (mean age 64 years, 75.3% male) undergoing repeat AF ablation with complete follow-up data were included at a single institution from 2010 to 2015. ER and LR were defined as atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia) > 30 s within the 3-month blanking period (BP) and after the 3-month BP, respectively.

Results

ER occurred in 79/259 (30.5%), and LR occurred in 138/259 (53%) at a median follow-up of 1221 (IQR: 523–1712) days. Four-year freedom from LR was 22% and 56% in patients with and without ER, respectively (p < 0.001). After multivariate adjustment, ER was strongly associated with LR, cardioversion post BP, and repeat ablation, but not associated with hospitalization. Compared to those with no ER, there was a higher risk of LR when ER occurred within the first month of the BP [month 1: hazard ratio (HR) 2.32, confidence interval (CI) 1.57–3.74, p < 0.001; month 2: HR 2.01, CI 1.13–3.83, p = 0.02; month 3: HR 1.46, CI 0.5–3.36, p = 0.37], however the prediction of LR based on timing within the BP was poor (area under curve 0.64).

Conclusion

Following repeat AF ablation, ER is strongly associated with LR, cardioversion post BP, and repeat ablation.

The efficacy and safety of cryoballoon catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Electrical isolation of pulmonary vein ostia is an established therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of cryoballoon catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with normal anatomy of the left atrium.

METHODS

Two hundred fifteen consecutive patients were included in the study (from November 2014 to November 2016). All the patients had symptoms of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs and underwent pulmonary vein cryoisolation using second-generation cryoballoons. Standard "single-shot" cryoballoon exposures were used alternately for each of the four pulmonary veins. The endpoint of the ablation procedure was the electrical isolation of each pulmonary vein.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients had stable atrial fibrillation recurrences and left atrial flutter with 30 of 69 patients having atrial fibrillation paroxysms during the first year after primary ablation. Repeated ablation was performed within 6-12 months after the first ablation. In 39 of 69 cases, arrhythmia recurrences were registered during the second and third year after the first ablation. These patients underwent repeated ablation within 12-36 months after the first ablation. In 98% of the patients, no disease progression with a transition to a persistent form of atrial fibrillation was observed. During the mean 5-year follow-up period, no disease progression with the transition to persistent forms of atrial fibrillation was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, with normal left atrium anatomy and no risk factors, it can be controlled with single pulmonary vein isolation without additional atrial substrate modification.

Incidence and clinical impact of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) are common within the 3-month blanking period after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little evidence is available regarding the current guidelines on the blanking period after surgical AF ablation. We investigate the incidence and significance of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) and evaluate the optimal blanking period after surgical AF ablation.

METHODS

Data from 259 patients who underwent surgical AF ablation from 2009 to 2016 were collected. ERAT was defined as documented ATA episodes lasting for 30 s. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was constructed to evaluate the role of ERAT as a predictor of late recurrences (LR) for AF.

RESULTS

In total, 127 patients (49.0%) experienced their last episodes of ERAT during the first (n = 65), second (n = 14), or third (n = 48) month of the 3-month blanking period (p < .001). One year freedom from ATAs was 97.8% in patients without ERAT compared with 95.4%, 64.3%, and 8.3% in patients with ERAT in the first, second, and third months after the index procedure, respectively (p < .001). Hazard ratios of LR according to the timing of the last episode of ERAT first, second, and third months after the procedure were 2.84, 16.70, and 119.75, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ERAT occurred in 49.0% of patients within the first 3 months after surgical ablation. The occurrence of ERAT within 3 months after surgical AF ablation was a significant independent predictor of LR. Hence, the currently accepted 3-month blanking period may be considered for redefining in patients with AF surgical ablation.

Early recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation is associated with inferior long-term outcomes: Insights from a retrospective cohort study

AIMS

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to assess the influence of early recurrence (ER) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) on long-term outcomes and to identify clinical variables associated with ER.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinical and procedural data from 1285 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent PVI from 2011 to 2016. Kaplan-Meier, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to analyze the influence of ER on long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

ER was observed in 13% of patients. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed significantly different outcomes in 1285 patients with and without ER (49% vs 74%, log rank P < .01) and in 286 patients in the subgroup that underwent reablation (44% vs 79%, log rank P < .01). The hazard ratio (HR) of ER was 1.7 within 48 hours (5% of patients), 2.7 within 1 month (5%), 3.0 within 2 months (2%), and 6.4 within 3 months (1%) for late recurrence (LR), P < .01. ROC analysis (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.79) resulted in 70.3% sensitivity and 74.2% specificity for a 14-day blanking period, and 53.1% sensitivity and 85.5% specificity for a 30-day blanking period. Female patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.69, P < .01) and those with diabetes (OR 1.95, P = .01) were at higher risk for ER.

CONCLUSIONS

ER is observed in a substantial number of patients with paroxysmal AF after PVI and has a continuous direct effect on LR according to the timing of ER. Randomized trials are required to assess the safety and effects of reablations in a shortened blanking period on long-term outcomes.

Early recurrence during the blanking period and left atrial reverse remodeling after catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Background

Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ERAT) during a 90-day blanking period (BP) often occurs after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Left atrial reverse remodeling (LARR), which is the reduction in LA volume (LAV), also occurs during the BP. Both ERAT and LARR are associated with late recurrence (LR, greater than 90 days after ablation). We investigated the association between ERAT and LARR following non-paroxysmal AF (NPAF) ablation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 330 consecutive patients undergoing initial NPAF ablation (median follow-up: 4.0 years). Based on the timing of the final ERAT, we divided the patients into No-ERAT (N = 154, without ERAT), Early (N = 39, 0–7 days after ablation), Intermediate (N = 67, 8–30), and Late-ERAT (N = 70, 31–90) groups. We assessed the extent of LARR, defined as the percentage of decrease in LAV (%ΔLAV). The %ΔLAV cutoff value was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis, and incorporated into a multivariate analysis to assess the association between ERAT and LARR.

Results

Late-ERAT was associated with LR (hazard ratio: 6.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.21–9.47, p = 0.0001). The %ΔLAV in the Late-ERAT group was significantly smaller than the other groups (p < 0.0001). The predictive power of %ΔLAV for LR was slight (AUC, 0.604; best cutoff, 18.8% decrease; p = 0.0011). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, Late-ERAT was associated with poor LARR (%ΔLAV < 18.8% decrease) (odds ratio, 0.13; 95%CI, 0.06–0.27; p < 0.001), whereas Early- and Intermediate-ERAT did not show any correlation.

Conclusions

Late-ERAT was strongly associated with poor LARR after NPAF ablation. Both Late-ERAT and poor LARR might reflect a residual arrhythmogenic substrate causing LR.

Comparison of Amiodarone and Propafenone in Blanking Period after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Background

Amiodarone and propafenone are commonly used to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it is not known which one is better in reducing early recurrence (ER) during the blanking period (the first three months after catheter ablation).

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of amiodarone and propafenone in reducing ER during the blanking period after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in AF patients.

Materials and Methods

A total of 694 patients who underwent their first RFCA between May 2014 and May 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Subsequently, 202 patients were excluded according to the exclusion criteria. The remaining 492 patients were divided into two groups based on the choice of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) (amiodarone or propafenone) in the blanking period. The primary outcomes were incidence of ER and AAD-associated adverse effects during the blanking period after RFCA. Propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were used to compare the outcomes of the two groups while controlling for confounders.

Results

Among the 492 patients who took AADs in the blanking period (187 amiodarone and 305 propafenone), PSM selected 135 unique pairs of patients with similar characteristics. Amiodarone was associated with a lower ER incidence rate (23.7% versus 48.9%, p < 0.001) and a similar rate of AAD-associated adverse effects (2.1% versus 1.5%, p = 0.652). Treatment with amiodarone in the blanking period was significantly associated with a lower ER incidence rate compared to treatment with propafenone (HR = 0.416, 95% CI 0.272–0.637, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Compared with propafenone, amiodarone was associated with a lower ER incidence rate, and they had similar rates of AAD-associated adverse effects. Treatment with amiodarone in the blanking period was shown to be more effective in reducing ER than propafenone.

Re-definition of blanking period in radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the contact force era

INTRODUCTION

Early recurrence (ER) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is defined as the recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias within 3 months after AF ablation, however, this definition is based on data from the era of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), without contact force (CF) technology. We investigated the significance of ER as a risk factor for late recurrence (LR) in paroxysmal AF (PAF) patients treated with CF and non-CF-guided ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 395 patients with PAF who underwent RFCA. Of these, 97 patients underwent RFCA without-CF technology (non-CF group) and 298 underwent with CF technology (CF group). Over a 2-year postablation follow-up period, LR occurred in 54 (55.7%) patients in the non-CF group, and in 105 (35.2%) patients in the CF group. ER had a more significant relationship with LR in the CF group, and all patients in the CF group with ER in the third month developed LR.

CONCLUSION

PAF patients with ER who have undergone CF-guided ablation have a greater risk of LR than those who have undergone non-CF-guided ablation. ER in the third month after CF-guided ablation may indicate an absolute risk of LR. Blanking period could be defined as 2 months in the CF era.

Noninvasive electrocardiography monitoring for very early recurrence predicts long-term outcome in patients after atrial fibrillation ablation

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia, and catheter ablation has been shown to be a highly effective treatment for patients with symptomatic AF. Very early recurrence (VER) of AF within 7 days after catheter ablation is common, but the clinical significance of VER remains unclear. We have examined the usefulness of the noninvasive electrocardiography monitor for the detection of VER and the relationship between VER and late recurrence (LR).

Methods

Eighty‐eight patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation were retrospectively included. All patients underwent primary catheter ablation at a large general hospital between March 2016 and August 2018. All patients were followed up in atrial fibrillation clinic at an interval of every 3 months for late recurrence of AF. VER was evaluated by one‐lead continuous noninvasive electrocardiography monitoring device for 7 days after ablation. The association between VER and LR was analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression model.

Results

Mean age was 62.9 ± 9.7 years, and 39.8% were female. Thirty‐two patients (36.4%) experienced VER. After a mean follow‐up of 539.36 ± 211.66 days, 17 patients (19.3%) experienced LR. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed VER was an independent predictor of LR: HR 3.6 (95% CI, 1.2–10.8), p = .020. In addition, diabetes was also associated with LR of atrial fibrillation.

Conclusions

Noninvasive electrocardiography monitoring was a useful tool for detecting VER and VER after catheter ablation was associated with LR.

Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Radiofrequency Ablation: What to Expect

Recurrent atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation is observed in up to 50% of patients within 3 months. Early and multiple recurrences predict late recurrences within 1 year, which occurs in 20% to 50% of patients. Although no consensus exists regarding patient selection and timing of redo ablation, we refer symptomatic patients with multiple recurrences and persistent atrial fibrillation for ablation. Reisolation of reconnected pulmonary veins and ablation of nonpulmonary vein triggers is the primary ablation strategy. In addition to repeat ablation, we recommend weight loss, treatment of sleep-disordered breathing, and management of comorbid conditions for durable maintenance of sinus rhythm.

Blanking period after radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation guided by ablation lesion maturation based on serial MR imaging

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines recommend a 3-month blanking period after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablations, which are based on clinical observation. Our goal was to quantify the timeline of the radiofrequency ablation lesion maturation using serial late gadolinium enhancement-magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) and to develop a blanking period estimate based on visible lesion maturation.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria targeted patients who underwent AF ablation and at least four MRI scans: at baseline before ablation, within 24 hours after (acute), between 24 hours and 90 days after (subacute), and more than 90 days after ablation (chronic). Central nonenhanced (NE) and surrounding hyperenhanced (HE) area volumes were measured and normalized to chronic lesion volume.

RESULTS

This study assessed 75 patients with 309 MRIs. The acute lesion was heterogeneous with a HE region surrounding a central NE region in LGE-MRI; the acute volume of the total (HE + NE) lesion was 2.62 ± 0.46 times larger than that of the chronic lesion. Acute T2-weighted imaging also showed a relatively large area of edema. Both NE and HE areas gradually receded over time and NE was not observed after 30 days. Larger initial NE volume was associated with a significantly greater chronic scar volume and this total lesion volume receded to equal the chronic lesion size at approximately 72.5 days (95% prediction interval: 57.4-92.2).

CONCLUSION

On the basis of serial MRI, atrial ablation lesions are often fully mature before the typical 90-day blanking period, which could support more timely clinical decision making for arrhythmia recurrence.

Postablation Atrial Arrhythmias

Atrial arrhythmias, including atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter, are not uncommon after prior ablation. Mechanisms for arrhythmogenesis may vary and include recurrent conduction through sites of ablation, leading to recurrence of prior ablated arrhythmias and creation of new substrate. Incidence of postablation atrial arrhythmias varies across studies and may relate to the approach to ablation, including extent of ablation performed, or to extent of substrate identified at the time of prior ablation and how that relates to the lesion set. In addition, postablation atrial arrhythmias may be more common in certain types of cardiomyopathy, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Characteristics of early recurrences detected by continuous cardiac monitoring influencing the long-term outcome after atrial fibrillation ablation

AIMS

Early recurrences (ER) of atrial arrhythmias are common after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The significance of these ER is controversial. Based on data of continuous cardiac monitoring, we sought to investigate the characteristics of ER and their impact on late recurrences (LR) during follow-up.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-six patients with paroxysmal (49%) or persistent (51%) AF underwent an AF ablation with subsequent implantation of implantable loop recorder. Follow up was 12 months using remote monitoring. All atrial arrhythmia (AF or atrial tachycardia-AT-) episodes >30 seconds. within the 3-month blanking period were considered and the AF burden evaluated every 3 months.

RESULTS

Within the 3-months blanking period, 72 patients (57%) experienced an AF/AT recurrence. Survival free from any arrhythmia recurrence during follow-up was 40% in patients with ER vs 69% in those without ER. AF burden during the blanking period and timing of ER correlated significantly with LR at 12 months (area under curve = 0.74, P < .0001 and .831, P < .0001). An AF burden ≥0.5% and ER after 74 days predicted LR (sensitivity 60%, specificity 84.4%; sensitivity 75.6%, specificity 90.3%). In cox regression analysis, AF burden ≥0.5% and ER after 74 days were independently associated with LR.

CONCLUSION

Continuous cardiac monitoring after AF ablation provides important information regarding early recurrence episodes and their prognostic impact. A cut-off of 74 days for the blanking period seems to better differentiate patients with a good or a poor long-term outcome. An AF burden ≥0.5% during the 3 months postablation is predictive for late arrhythmia recurrences.

Predictive Factors and Safety of Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in Combination With Propofol Deep Sedation in Left Atrial Ablation Procedures

Catheter ablation is nowadays the core treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Propofol infusion sedation is an accepted safety strategy; however, respiratory depression with respiratory variations is frequent. Noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) added to deep sedation could improve procedural safety and success. We sought to assess the predictive factors and safety of NIV in combination to propofol deep sedation in left atrial ablation procedures. Procedural data from 252 consecutive patients who underwent left atrial ablation (166 [66%] persistent, 86 [34%] for paroxysmal AF) were analyzed. Sedation with 1% propofol was used in all procedures and controlled by electrophysiologists. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed regularly during the procedure. NIV was indicated for respiratory depression with pH <7.25 and pCO₂ >50 mm Hg or agitated patient with the need for more profound sedation. No patient needed endotracheal intubation, and no procedure was abandoned due to adverse effects of sedation. NIV was used in 25 patients (10%). Predictive factors for the use of NIV were high-dose propofol sedation (p = 0.010), persistent AF (p = 0.029), prolonged procedure time (p = 0.006), increased body mass index (p = 0.008) and presence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA; p <0.001). In a Cox regression analysis, OSA was an independent factor for NIV use (p = 0.016). In conclusion, propofol deep sedation for patients who underwent left atrial ablation is safe. Adding NIV in high-risk patients (i.e., OSA, high body mass index, and lengthy procedure duration) provides better respiratory homeostasis and could impact long-term procedure results.

Effect of acupuncture at Neiguan point combined with amiodarone therapy on early recurrence after pulmonary vein electrical isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

Early atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences are common and have been shown to predict AF recurrences late after AF ablation during follow-up. Neiguan point acupuncture has been recognized to be therapeutic in treating AF in clinical practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were enrolled in succession due to persistent AF. All patients were randomized divided into control group and acupuncture group. In the control group (n = 45), amiodarone was orally taken from the first day after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In the acupuncture group (n = 40), patients were treated with Neiguan point acupuncture for 7 days and amiodarone was prescribed as same as the control group after PVI. The levels of inflammatory factors were analyzed before operation, 1 week after the operation and 3 months later. After 3 months, the acupuncture group had a lower rate of early recurrences than the control group (5/40 [12.5%] vs 15/45 [33.3%], P = 0.039). The inflammatory factors level in the two groups were significantly increased after ablation. However, compared with the control group, the levels of TNF-α, IL-6, CRP, TGF-β1, MMP2 in the acupuncture group significantly lower (P < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, acupuncture was an independent factor associated with a lower rate of early recurrences during the blanking period (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.63; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Neiguan point acupuncture combined with amiodarone is superior to amiodarone alone in reducing early recurrences of patients with persistent AF after PVI. The efficacy of Neiguan acupuncture therapy on the early recurrence is associated with the decreased inflammation factors.

Usefulness of Failed Electrical Cardioversion for Early Recurrence After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation as a Predictor of Future Recurrence

Early recurrence of atrial arrhythmia (ERAA) during a blanking period after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) does not always result in subsequent AF recurrence. We investigated whether failed electrical cardioversion (ECV) during the blanking period was associated with recurrence. A total of 1,240 consecutive patients who underwent first-time CA for AF at our institution between March 2012 and March 2016 were investigated. Among the 517 patients (42%) who experienced ERAA, 262 underwent ECV. Failure or success of ECV was defined according to the current expert consensus statement. Failed ECV was defined as failure to terminate AF and/or relapse into AF within 30 seconds after transient sinus rhythm conversion by ECV with a shock energy of 270 J in this study. Of the patients, 254 (97%) with restored sinus rhythm were included, and 8 who experienced sustained AF afterward and discontinued the rhythm-control strategy were excluded. We divided the 254 patients into the following 2 groups on the basis of failed or successful ECV: failed-ECV (n = 105; at least 1 failed ECV but experienced successful ECV at a later date nevertheless) and successful-ECV (n = 149, no failed ECV) groups. At the median follow-up period of 610 days after CA, the recurrence rate was higher in the failed-ECV group than in the successful-ECV group (76.2% vs 45.6%, log-rank p < 0.001). After adjustment for baseline differences, failed ECV was found to be a significant predictor of recurrence in the multivariate model (p < 0.001). In conclusion, failed ECV for ERAA was an independent predictor of future recurrence.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcomes during a 3-year follow-up period

Objective

This study was performed to observe the effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and to explore the risk factors for late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (LRAF) after a single RFCA session.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 243 patients with PAF underwent RFCA and were followed up regularly.

Results

At a median follow-up of 37 months after a single procedure, 60.5% of patients maintained sinus rhythm (SR), and at a median follow-up of 42 months after multiple procedures, 74.9% of patients maintained SR. The statistically significant risk factors for LRAF after a single RFCA session were the left atrial diameter (LAD), left inferior pulmonary vein superior–inferior diameter (LIPV SID), PV number variation, circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) combined with additional ablation, and early recurrence of atrial fibrillation (ERAF). The best cut-off value for LAD was 35.5 mm.

Conclusions

During a 3-year follow-up, about 70% of the patients with PAF maintained SR. LRAF after a single procedure was associated with the LAD, LIPV SID, PV number variation, CPVI combined with additional ablation, and ERAF.

Predictors of Short and Long Term Recurrences of Paroxysmal AF after Radiofrequency Ablation. Is Blanking Period Really Benign?

Background

Following pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), early recurrences of atrial arrhythmias (ERAA) are frequent, classified benign as a part of a blanking period. But recently it seems that there is increased incidence of late recurrences in patients with ERAA but mechanism is still unknown.

Purpose

To assess the incidence and risk factors for early and late AF recurrences post AF ablation and the impact of these ERAA on long-term success.

Methods

Thirty-six consecutive patients (age 45 ± 11 years, 72% males) undergoing RF ablation for PAF. They were followed up in hospital for 2 days post ablation then every week for one month. Subsequent follow-up visits consisted of clinical interview, ECGs, and 24h Holter monitoring every 3 months were done for one year. Extended Holter monitoring was done for patients with palpitations. Any episode of symptomatic or asymptomatic documented atrial tachyarrhythmia > 30 seconds was considered recurrence.

Results

Prevalence of ERAA during first 3 months was 47.2%, while late AF recurrence was 25%. 35% of patients with ERAA had late AF recurrence. ≥ 2 attacks of ERAA during the blanking period had significant diagnostic performance in prediction of late AF with sensitivity 44% and specificity 100% (p value=0.05) and also long procedural time ( with sensitivity 89% and specificity 63% (p value=0.049). Multivariate logistic regression showed that frequent ERAA attacks was the only significant factor that increases the risk of late AF recurrence (p value =0.008, OR= 4.39, 95% CI=1.48-12.99).

Conclusion

ERAA in blanking period may be associated with increased risk for late AF recurrence. Frequent episodes of early recurrences (≥ 2 attacks) is a strong predictor for late AF recurrence. These data should be considered during follow up of the patients with paroxysmal AF after ablation.

Diagnostic utility of long-term remote ECG monitoring in compare with 24 hour Holter monitoring in patients with atrial fibrillation after catheter radiofrequency ablation in the early postoperative period

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic utility of long-term remote monitoring of ECG compared with 24 hour Holter monitoring for the detection of cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disturbance in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter radiofrequency ablation (RFA; isolation) of the pulmonary veins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 62 patients aged 58.5±11.1 years, with paroxysmal or persistent AF, after catheter RFA (pulmonary veins isolation). Patients underwent long-term remote ECG monitoring, 24 hour Holter monitoring and transthoracic echocardiogram.

RESULTS

After 24 hour Holter monitoring of 62 patients with AF after RFA in 21 of them (33.9%) was detected early recurrence of AF. Remote ECG monitoring of 18 patients, detected AF in 7 patients (39%), 2 of them were asymptomatic AF recurrence. 24 hour Holter monitoring of the same 18 patients AF recurrence was not detected at all (0%).

CONCLUSION

Both of devices, long-term remote monitoring of ECG and 24 hour Holter monitoring detected 45.2% of recurrence of AF. Over the wearing of both devises 24 hour Holter and long-term remote monitor the last detected more events among 18 patients (33% vs 0%). Two evens of AF recurrence were asymptomatic.

Long-term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation

Catheter ablation has been wildly used to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) and has achieved a better efficacy for paroxysmal AF (PAF) but not for persistent AF (PerAF). Furthermore, a few data on the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation for PerAF were reported. This study aimed to investigate long-term efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for PerAF and explore predictors of late recurrence of atrial fibrillation (LRAF).A total of 92 consecutive patients with PerAF (64 males, aged 56.42 ± 11.24 years) were enrolled in this study and accepted circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) alone or CPVI combined additional ablation.Maintenance rate of sinus rhythm (SR) was 40.2% after a single procedure with median follow-up of 15 months and 52.2% after mean 1.3 ± 0.6 procedures with median follow-up of 26 months. Long-term SR maintenance rate was no statistical difference between patients with CPVI alone and with CPVI combined additional ablation (48.6% vs 35.1%, log rank test, P = .152). Patients with AF duration < 24 months had a higher long-term SR maintenance rate than those with AF duration ≥ 24 months (55.6% vs 30.4%, log rank test, P = .022). AF duration (OR = 1.015, 95%CI 1.001-1.030, P = .015), and early recurrence of AF (ERAF) (OR = 10.654, 95%CI 3.853-29.460, P < .001) were predictors of LRAF after a single procedure.In conclusion, long-term maintenance SR rate was 52.2% in patients with PerAF after multiple procedures with a median over 2-year follow-up. Patients with AF duration < 24 months had better outcome. AF duration and ERAF were predictors of LRAF after a single procedure.

Are left ventricular ejection fraction and left atrial diameter related to atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation?: A meta-analysis

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common form of arrhythmia, is associated with the prevalence of many common cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Catheter ablation is considered the first-line therapy for AF; however, AF recurrence is very common after catheter ablation. Studies have been performed to analyze the factors associated with AF recurrence, but none have reached a consistent conclusion on whether left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrial diameter (LA diameter) affect AF recurrence after catheter ablation.The databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were used to search for relevant studies up to September 2017. RevMan 5.3.5 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration Network was used to conduct this meta-analysis.Thirteen studies involving 2825 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the results revealed that elevated LA diameter values were significantly associated with AF recurrence in patients after catheter ablation (MD = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.63-2.75, P < .001), while baseline LVEF levels were not significantly positively associated with AF recurrence in patients after catheter ablation (MD = -0.91, 95% CI: -1.18 to 1.67, P = .14).Overall, elevated LA diameter may be associated with AF recurrence after catheter ablation; however, there was no direct relationship between LVEF values and AF recurrence after catheter ablation when baseline LVEF values are normal or mildly decreased. Besides, because of publication bias, further studies should be performed to explore the mechanisms underlying AF recurrence.

Increased left atrial size is associated with higher atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients treated with antiarrhythmic medications

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent, and antiarrhythmic therapy is often used to help with rhythm control. Some common echocardiographic parameters may be useful in predicting AF recurrence among these patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between 3 common echocardiographic parameters (left atrial [LA] size, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], and mitral regurgitation [MR]) and AF recurrence among patients treated with antiarrhythmic medications.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that LA size, LVEF, and severity of MR are predictors of AF recurrence in this population.

METHODS

A real-world cohort of AF patients who had transthoracic echocardiograms was analyzed. Data on LA size, LVEF, and MR were collected retrospectively from echocardiography reports. Patients were followed from the time of the echocardiogram until first recurrence of AF.

RESULTS

A total of 2522 patients had echocardiography reports available for review. LA size showed the strongest prognostic relationship with AF recurrence; neither LVEF nor MR was significantly associated with AF recurrence. These results persisted after adjusting for age, sex, race, tobacco use, alcohol use, drug use, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index in a multivariable model.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of patients treated with antiarrhythmic medications that had transthoracic echocardiogram data, LA size was a significant predictor of AF recurrence. The clinical utility of this finding would be strengthened by replication in a multicenter setting.

Early Recurrences During the Blanking Period after Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Early recurrences of atrial arrhythmias (ERAA) after ablation are common and predict late recurrences and ablation failure.However,becausea proportion of patients with ERAA will have no subsequent arrhythmias after the blanking period, consensus guidelines recommend against immediate repeat ablation for ERAA episodes occurring during the first 3 months post-ablation. In this review, we summarize the predictors, significance, and treatment of ERAA after AF ablation.

Efficacy of second-generation cryoballoon ablation in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation patients

AIMS

In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of single pulmonary vein isolation with the second-generation cryoballoon (CB-Adv) and predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrences in patients with paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF).

METHODS

Consecutive PAF and PersAF patients undergoing CB-Adv for the first time were enrolled. Patients were followed with in-clinic visits including Holter ECG. Atrial arrhythmic episodes symptomatic or documented lasting more than 30 s were considered as recurrences.

RESULTS

A total of 96 consecutive patients [77 men (80%), mean age 57.4 ± 9.9 years] were included in this analysis. About 56 (58%) patients had PAF and 40 had (42%) PersAF. The mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 116 ± 24 and 33 ± 12 min, respectively. Procedure-related complications occurred in four (4.2%) patients.At the 12-month follow-up, after a 3-month blanking period, freedom from recurrences was achieved in 59% [confidence interval (CI): 49-69%] of patients, 62% (CI: 48-75%) in PAF, and 54% (CI: 38-71%) in PersAF group. The difference was not statistically significant at the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (P = 0.242). Cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm was less frequently needed in PAF group [5% (CI: 1-15%) vs. 25% (CI: 13-41%), P < 0.001]. Redo procedure was performed in 7% (CI: 3-15%) of patients. In the Cox regression analysis, early atrial-tachyarrhythmia recurrence was the only independent predictor of 1-year recurrence (hazard ratio 2.11, CI: 1.06-4.20, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The success rate at 12 months after a single CB-Adv procedure was 62% in patients with PAF and 54% in study participants with PersAF. Early atrial-tachyarrhythmia recurrence appeared to be the only independent predictor of late atrial fibrillation recurrence.