Characteristics of complex fractionated electrograms in nonpulmonary vein ectopy initiating atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia

Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Percutaneous catheter ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation. However, catheter ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation is associated with unsatisfying success rates. This review aims to summarize the recent literature on the progress of catheter ablation among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we outline the potential future therapeutic techniques of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. We highlight the innovative techniques (rotor mapping, substrate mapping, delayed enhancement MRI, and high-resolution mapping catheter) of current approaches and optimal procedural endpoint for persistent atrial fibrillation.

SUMMARY

In summary, the optimal catheter ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation remains unknown. Current data highlight the need for a better understanding of the substrate and mechanisms of arrhythmia maintenance in this population. Current mapping technologies offer additional tools (improved automatic algorithm for annotation, multiple electrode mapping, high-resolution mapping, and application of different processing techniques) for identifying the putative mechanism underlying atrial fibrillation. Further prospective studies are needed for the optimal procedural endpoint and the recent innovative techniques and their clinical benefits in ablation strategies.

Early and Delayed Alteration of Atrial Electrograms Around Single Radiofrequency Ablation Lesion

Purpose: The acute effect of radiofrequency (RF) ablation includes local necrosis and oedema. We investigated the spatiotemporal change of atrial electrograms in the area surrounding the site of single standardized pulse of RF energy.

Methods: The study enrolled 12 patients (45–67 years, 10 males) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing ablation procedure with irrigated-tip ablation catheter and 3D navigation. The high-density mapping/remapping (129 ± 63 points) within the circular area with radius of ~10 mm, centered at the pre-specified posterior left pulmonary vein antrum ablation site was performed at baseline, immediately after single RF energy delivery (25 W, 30 s, 20 ml/min) and after 30 min waiting period. Bipolar voltages of atrial electrograms (A-EGM-biV) were averaged within the central and 12 adjacent left atrium segments and their relative change was studied.

Results: After the ablation, overall A-EGM-biV within the mapping zone (3.51 ± 1.89 mV at baseline) reduced to 2.83 ± 1.77 mV (immediately) and to 2.68 ± 1.58 mV (after 30 min waiting period). In per-segment pair-wise comparison, we observed highly significant change in A-EGM-biV that extended up to the distance of 8.8 mm from the lesion core. The maximum early A-EGM-biV attenuation by 39–49% (P < 0.001) was registered in segments adjacent to pulmonary vein ostia. The subsequent (delayed) A-EGM-biV reduction by 17–24% (P < 0.05) was observed in opposite direction from the lesion center.

Conclusions: Significant alteration of atrial electrograms was detectable rather distant from the central lesion. Spatiotemporal development of ablation lesion was eccentric/asymmetric. While acute A-EGM-biV reduction can be attributed predominantly to direct thermal injury, delayed effects are probably due to oedema progression.

Catheter Ablation of Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: a Reckless Challenge or a Way to Real Cure?

Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (L-PeAF) is a category in which rhythm control is attempted while atrial fibrillation (AF) is maintained for more than 1 year. Because AF is a progressive disease and L-PeAF accompanies significant electrical and structural remodeling of atria, it is difficult to restore and maintain sinus rhythm in patients with L-PeAF. Nonetheless, the rhythm outcome is being increasingly improved by the development of sophisticated mapping devices, highly efficient catheters, and evidence-based ablation strategies, and the rational choice of patient selection criteria. This review discusses the evolution of the rhythm control outcome of L-PeAF and its future direction of development.

Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Originating from Non-pulmonary Vein Areas

Pulmonary veins (PVs) are a major source of ectopic beats that initiate AF. PV isolation from the left atrium is an effective therapy for the majority of paroxysmal AF. However, investigators have reported that ectopy originating from non-PV areas can also initiate AF. Patients with recurrent AF after persistent PV isolation highlight the need to identify non-PV ectopy. Furthermore, adding non-PV ablation after multiple AF ablation procedures leads to lower AF recurrence and a higher AF cure rate. These findings suggest that non-PV ectopy is important in both the initiation and recurrence of AF. This article summarises current knowledge about the electrophysiological characteristics of non-PV AF, suitable mapping and ablation strategies, and the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation of AF initiated by ectopic foci originating from non-PV areas.

Impact of electrophysiological and pharmacological noninducibility following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Two methods for testing inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF)-atrial pacing and isoproterenol infusion-have been proposed to determine the endpoint of catheter ablation. However, the utility of the combination for testing electrophysiological inducibility (EPI) and pharmacological inducibility (PHI) is unclear.

METHODS

After pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), inducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmia was assessed with the dual methods in 291 consecutive patients with AF (65% paroxysmal) undergoing initial catheter ablation.

RESULTS

The incidence of EPI was significantly higher in patients with persistent AF than paroxysmal AF (32.0% vs 11.7%, respectively, P < .001). The incidence of PHI was not significantly different between the two groups (25.2% vs 26.1%, respectively, P = .87). There was no significant difference in AF recurrence according to inducibility in paroxysmal AF. In persistent AF, however, patients achieving neither EPI nor PHI under PVI-only strategy had significantly lower rates of AF recurrence than those achieving either EPI or PHI and consequently requiring additional ablation for inducible atrial tachyarrhythmia (68.5% vs 49.0%, respectively; log-rank test, P = .022). In persistent AF, multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that achieving neither EPI nor PHI was a negative independent predictor of AF recurrence (HR 0.492, 95% CI 0.254-0.916, P = .026).

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving neither EPI nor PHI following PVI was associated with favorable outcome in patients with persistent AF. The combination of tests may discriminate patients responsive to the PVI-only strategy. Further selective approaches are necessary to improve outcome for inducible atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with persistent AF.

Beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation: the Role of Additional Sites in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the long-term procedural outcome remains suboptimal and there is a frequent need for repeat ablation procedure, especially in patients with non-paroxysmal AF. The review article summarizes the rationales, recent evidences, and strategies of ablation of extra-PV sites and its clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is a consensus that durable PV isolations are a definite therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF. In non-paroxysmal AF, many laboratories still believe that adequate substrate ablation outside PVs is definitely required. Empirical linear ablation is not recommended because of difficulty in achieving complete linear block, unless macro-reentry atrial tachycardia developed during procedure. Most of laboratories applied complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation after PV isolation in non-paroxysmal AF, but the efficacy is limited in the long-term follow-up studies. A combined approach using CFAE, non-linear similarity, and phase mapping strategy to identify rotors or focal sources for substrate modification increases the ablation outcome, when compared to CFAE ablation alone. Provocative test with mapping of non-PV triggers is also recommended in all patients to improve long-term ablation success. Ablation beyond PV isolation is important, especially in non-paroxysmal AF patients, to modify the diseased atrial substrate and eliminate the non-PV triggers, which in turn improve the ablation outcome.

Clinical Significance of Additional Ablation of Atrial Premature Beats after Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

PURPOSE

The clinical significance of post-procedural atrial premature beats immediately after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been clearly determined. We hypothesized that the provocation of immediate recurrence of atrial premature beats (IRAPB) and additional ablation improves the clinical outcome of AF ablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 200 patients with AF (76.5% males; 57.4±11.1 years old; 64.3% paroxysmal AF) who underwent catheter ablation. Post-procedure IRAPB was defined as frequent atrial premature beats (≥6/min) under isoproterenol infusion (5 μg/min), monitored for 10 min after internal cardioversion, and we ablated mappable IRAPBs. Post-procedural IRAPB provocations were conducted in 100 patients. We compared the patients who showed IRAPB with those who did not. We also compared the IRAPB provocation group with 100 age-, sex-, and AF-type-matched patients who completed ablation without provocation (No-Test group).

RESULTS

1) Among the post-procedural IRAPB provocation group, 33% showed IRAPB and required additional ablation with a longer procedure time (p=0.001) than those without IRAPB, without increasing the complication rate. 2) During 18.0±6.6 months of follow-up, the patients who showed IRAPB had a worse clinical recurrence rate than those who did not (27.3% vs. 9.0%; p=0.016), in spite of additional IRAPB ablation. 3) However, the clinical recurrence rate was significantly lower in the IRAPB provocation group (15.0%) than in the No-Test group (28.0%; p=0.025) without lengthening of the procedure time or raising complication rate.

CONCLUSION

The presence of post-procedural IRAPB was associated with a higher recurrence rate after AF ablation. However, IRAPB provocation and additional ablation might facilitate a better clinical outcome. A further prospective randomized study is warranted.

Elimination Of Triggers Without An Additional Substrate Modification Is Not Sufficient In Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a multifactorial disease with complex pathophysiology. Although restoring sinus rhythm delays the progression of atrial remodeling, non-pharmacologic intervention, such as radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), should be done based on the background pathophysiology of the disease. While circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) has been known to be the cornerstone of AF catheter ablation, a clinical recurrence rate after CPVI is high in patients with persistent AF (PeAF). Step-wise linear ablation, complex fractionate atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided ablation, rotor ablation, ganglionate plexus ablation, and left atrial appendage isolation may improve the ablation success rate after CPVI. But, there are still substantial AF recurrences after such liberal atrial substrate ablation, and current ablation techniques regarding substrate modification still have limitations. Therefore, more understanding about AF pathophysiology and early precise intervention may improve clinical outcome of AF management. Keeping in mind "more touch, more scar," operators should generate most efficient substrate modification to achieve better long-term clinical outcome.

Differences of BiAtrial Substrate Properties in Patients with Different Types of AF

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice and induces cardiac dysfunction and strokes. The development of AF requires a"trigger" and also an electroanatomic "substrate" capable of both initiating and perpetuating AF. Over the past decade, the understanding of the AF substrate properties in both atria has increased with fractionation and frequency analyses of the local atrial electrograms using three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping systems. The purpose of this review was to discuss the differences in the atrial substrate properties in patients with different types of AF.

Functional nature of electrogram fractionation demonstrated by left atrial high-density mapping

BACKGROUND

Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) are targets of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Serial high-density maps were evaluated to understand the impact of activation direction and rate on electrogram (EGM) fractionation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighteen patients (9 persistent) underwent high-density, 3-dimensional, left-atrial mapping (>400 points/map) during AF, sinus (SR), and CS-paced (CSp) rhythms. In SR and CSp, fractionation was defined as an EGM with ≥4 deflections, although, in AF, CFE-mean <80 ms was considered as continuous CFAE. The anatomic distribution of CFAE sites was assessed, quantified, and correlated between rhythms. Mechanisms underlying fractionation were investigated by analysis of voltage, activation, and propagation maps. A minority of continuous CFAE sites displayed EGM fractionation in SR (15+/-4%) and CSp (12+/-8%). EGM fractionation did not match between SR and CSp at 70+/-10% sites. Activation maps in SR and CSp showed that wave collision (71%) and regional slow conduction (24%) caused EGM fractionation. EGM voltage during AF (0.59+/-0.58 mV) was lower than during SR and CSp (>1.0 mV) at all sites. During AF, the EGM voltage was higher at continuous CFAE sites than at non-CFAE sites (0.53 mV (Q1, Q3: 0.33 to 0.83) versus 0.30 mV (Q1, Q3: 0.18 to 0.515), P<0.00001). Global LA voltage in AF was lower in patients with persistent AF versus patients with paroxysmal AF (0.6+/-0.59 mV versus 1.12+/-1.32 mV, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The distribution of fractionated EGMs is highly variable, depending on direction and rate of activation (SR versus CSp versus AF). Fractionation in SR and CSp rhythms mostly resulted from wave collision. All sites with continuous fractionation in AF displayed normal voltage in SR, suggesting absence of structural scar. Thus, many fractionated EGMs are functional in nature, and their sites dynamic.

Noncavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial tachycardia after paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Atrial tachycardia (AT) is commonly encountered after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. But no study exclusively on noncavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right AT (NCTI-RAT) post-AF ablation has been reported. The present study aims to describe its prevalence, electrophysiological mechanisms, and ablation strategy and to further discuss its relationship with AF.

METHODS

From July 2006 to November 2009, 350 consecutive patients underwent catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF. A total of seven patients (2.0%) developed NCTI-RAT after left atrium ablation for AF. In these highly selected patients (two male, mean age 54 ± 11 years, mean left atrium diameter of 34 ± 7 cm), all had circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in their initial procedures and three of them had additional complex fractionated electrograms ablation in the left atrium and the coronary sinus.

RESULTS

Totally, nine NCTI-RATs were mapped and successfully ablated in the right atrium with a mean cycle length of 273 ± 64 ms in seven patients. Five ATs in three patients were electrophysiologically proved to be macroreentry and the remaining four were focal activation. All the ATs were successfully abolished by catheter ablation. After a mean follow-up of 29 ± 15 months post-AT ablation, all patients were free of AT and AF off antiarrhythmic drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

 NCTI-RAT is relatively less common post-AF ablation. Totally, 2.0% of paroxysmal AF patients were revealed to have NCTI-RAT.

Relationship between arrhythmogenic pulmonary veins and the surrounding atrial substrate in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between pulmonary veins (PVs) with atrial fibrillation (AF) initiating triggers and their surrounding atrial substrate has not been elucidated. We aimed to clarify the atrial substrate properties around the PVs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-three paroxysmal AF patients were studied with the identification of PV initiating triggers. High-density mapping of the dominant frequency (DF, 1200 Hz) and the mean degree of the complex fractionated electrograms (CFE mean interval over 6 seconds) was evaluated in 2 zones (zone 1: < 5 mm, zone 2: 5-15 mm from the PVs) and the left atrial (LA) using a NavX system prior to the PV isolation. High-DFs (>8 Hz) and continuous CFEs (<50 ms) were identified in 1.5 ± 0.9 and 2.3 ± 1.1 regions per patient, respectively. Most of the high-DF regions (86%) and continuous CFE regions (77%) were located within 15 mm of the PV ostia. Of those, 75% of the high-DF regions and 54% of the continuous CFE regions were related to arrhythmogenic PVs. There was a significant DF gradient from arrhythmogenic PV zone 1 to zone 2, while the mean CFE exhibited a significant gradient between arrhythmogenic PV zone 2 and the rest of the LA. Additionally, 69% of the procedural AF termination sites were at arrhythmogenic PV zone 2.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of the atrial substrate properties may be useful for locating arrhythmogenic PVs during AF and defining the extent of the circumferential PV isolation.

The novel electrophysiology of complex fractionated atrial electrograms: insight from noncontact unipolar electrograms

BACKGROUND

The noncontact mapping (NCM) system possesses the merit of global endocardial recording for unipolar and activation mapping.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the unipolar electrogram characteristics and activation pattern over the bipolar complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) sites during atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Twenty patients (age 55 +/- 11 years old, 15 males) who underwent NCM and ablation of AF (paroxysmal/persistent = 13/7) were included. Both contact bipolar (32-300 Hz) and NCM virtual unipolar electrograms (0.5-300 Hz) were simultaneously recorded along with the activation pattern (total 223 sites, 11 +/- 4 sites/patient). A CFAE was defined as a mean bipolar cycle length of <or= 120 ms with an intervening isoelectric interval of more than 50 ms (Group 1A, n = 63, rapid repetitive CFAEs) or continuous fractionated activity (Group 1B, n = 59, continuous fractionated CFAEs), measured over a 7.2-second duration. Group 2 consisted of those with a bipolar cycle length of more than 120 ms (n = 101).

RESULTS

The Group 1A CFAE sites exhibited a shorter unipolar electrogram cycle length (129 +/- 11 vs 164 +/- 20 ms, P < 0.001), and higher percentage of an S-wave predominant pattern (QS or rS wave, 63 +/- 13% vs 35 +/- 13%, P < 0.001) than the Group 2 non-CFAE sites. There was a linear correlation between the bipolar and unipolar cycle lengths (P < 0.001, R = 0.87). Most of the Group 1A CFAEs were located over arrhythmogenic pulmonary vein ostia or nonpulmonary vein ectopy with repetitive activations from those ectopies (62%) or the pivot points of the turning wavefronts (21%), whereas the Group 1B CFAEs exhibited a passive activation (44%) or slow conduction (31%).

CONCLUSIONS

The bipolar repetitive and continuous fractionated CFAEs represented different activation patterns. The former was associated with an S wave predominant unipolar morphology which may represent an important focus for maintaining AF.