Maintenance hemodialysis decreases serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels in hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection

Effects of comorbid conditions and prescribed chronic medications on the treatment plan for chronic hepatitis C infection: A cross-sectional retrospective study

Background

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection is a potentially life-threatening condition characterized by various complications, including end-stage liver disease and cirrhosis. The mortality rate associated with CHC has been increasing due to the presence of comorbidities and the use of chronic medications. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the impact of these comorbidities and chronic medications on the treatment plan for CHC.

Methods

To achieve this objective, a cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The study population included patients aged 12 years and above who were diagnosed with CHC between 2016 and 2021. Patients below the age of 12 were excluded from the study. A total of 170 patients with CHC were included in the analysis. The study aimed to evaluate the relationship between CHC complications and the treatment approach.

Results

The mean age of the study participants was 66.78 years, with a higher proportion of female patients. The findings revealed a significant association between hypertension (p = 0.042) and cirrhosis (p = 0.007) with changes in the treatment plan for CHC. Moreover, the presence of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.045), renal diseases (p < 0.001), and hypothyroidism (p = 0.004) were significantly associated with HCV clearance after the initiation of therapy. Additionally, the use of proton pump inhibitors (p = 0.033) and levothyroxine (p = 0.025) was found to be associated with a higher rate of CHC clearance.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study highlights the prevalence of comorbid conditions and the use of chronic medications among patients with CHC. The findings emphasize the importance of considering the effects of comorbidities and chronic medications when developing treatment plans for CHC infections. By taking these factors into account, healthcare professionals can optimize the management of CHC and improve patient outcomes.

Molecular characterization and genotyping of hepatitis C virus from Sudanese end-stage renal disease patients on haemodialysis

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a global public health problem, with ~ 11 million people in Africa infected. There is incomplete information on HCV in Sudan, particularly in haemodialysis patients, who have a higher prevalence compared to the general population. Thus, our objectives were to genotype and molecularly characterize HCV isolated from end-stage renal disease haemodialysis patients.

Methods

A total of 541 patients were recruited from eight haemodialysis centres in Khartoum and screened for anti-HCV. Viral loads were determined using in-house real-time PCR in seropositive patients. HCV was genotyped and subtyped using sequencing of amplicons of 5′ untranslated (UTR) and non-structural protein 5B (NS5B) regions, followed by phylogenetic analysis of corresponding sequences.

Results

The HCV seroprevalence in the study was 17% (93/541), with HCV RNA-positive viremic rate of 7% (40/541). A low HCV load, with a mean of 2.85 × 104 IU/ml and a range of 2.95 × 103 to 4.78 × 106 IU/ml, was detected. Phylogenetic analyses showed the presence of genotypes 1, 3, 4, and 5 with subtypes 1a, 1b, 1 g, 3a, 4a, 4 l, 4 m, 4 s, and 4t. Sequences of HCV from the same haemodialysis units, clustered in similar genotypes and subtypes intimating nosocomial infection.

Conclusion

HCV infection is highly prevalent in haemodialysis patients from Sudan, with phylogenetic analysis intimating nosocomial infection. HCV genotyping is useful to locate potential transmission chains and to enable individualized treatment using highly effective direct-acting antivirals (DAAs).

Successful Hepatitis C Virus Eradication in a Hemodialysis Patient With 2k/1b Chimera Genotype: A Case Report and Literature Review

Treatment of hemodialysis patients infected with two or three hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes (Gt) with interferon-free regimens has not been possible until the recent introduction of pan-genotypic next generation therapy. The main reason is that sofosbuvir (SOF)-containing regimens are contraindicated in patients with low glomerular filtration rate. We describe here a case of a chronic HCV infection in a patient with end-stage renal disease, successfully treated with gleсaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB). Limited published data are available regarding the efficacy of antiviral therapy in patients with rare HCV recombinant Gt 2k/1b. We were not able to identify any reports describing treatment of hemodialysis patients with this recombinant type of HCV. We present a 57-year-old patient with autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease with liver involvement with end-stage of kidney disease. He was infected with HCV Gt 2k/1b variant after initiation of hemodialysis. This subtype appeared in Russia (Soviet Union that times) as a result of high frequency of virus mutations, and actually is widely spread in some states of the post-Soviet space, as well as in the countries with intensive migration from Russia and other former Soviet republics. In this particular case, we observed a tendency to a rapid progression of liver fibrosis despite mild clinical activity of chronic hepatitis C. A 12-week course of GLE/PIB allowed achieving sustained virologic response (SVR) and was well tolerated.

Management of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with chronic kidney disease: position statement of the joint committee of Italian association for the study of the liver (AISF), Italian society of internal medicine (SIMI), Italian society of infectious and tropical disease (SIMIT) and Italian society of nephrology (SIN)

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now considered a systemic disease due to the occurrence of extra-hepatic manifestations. Among these, the renal involvement is frequent. HCV infection, in fact, is strongly associated with proteinuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and negatively affects the prognosis of renal patients. In the last few years, availability of more specific and effective drugs against HCV has dramatically changed the clinical course of this disease. These drugs may provide further advantages in the CKD population as a whole by reducing progression of renal disease, mortality rate and by increasing the survival of graft in renal transplant recipients. The strict pathogenetic and prognostic link between HCV infection and CKD requires an ongoing relationship among the healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of both HCV infection and CKD. Therefore, Scientific Societies involved in the care of this high-risk population in Italy have organized a joint expert panel. The aim of the panel is to produce a position statement that can be used in daily clinical practice for the management of HCV infected patients across the whole spectrum of renal disease, from the conservative phase to renal replacement treatments (dialysis and transplantation). Sharing specific evidence-based expertise of different professional healthcare is the first step to obtain a common ground of knowledge on which to instate a model for multidisciplinary management of this high-risk population. Statements cover seven areas including epidemiology of CKD, HCV-induced glomerular damage, HCV-related renal risk, staging of liver disease in patients with CKD, prevention of transmission of HCV in hemodialysis units, treatment of HCV infection and management of HCV in kidney transplantation.

Management of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with chronic kidney disease: position statement of the joint committee of Italian association for the study of the liver (AISF), Italian society of internal medicine (SIMI), Italian society of infectious and tropical disease (SIMIT) and Italian society of nephrology (SIN)

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now considered a systemic disease due to the occurrence of extra-hepatic manifestations. Among these, the renal involvement is frequent. HCV infection, in fact, is strongly associated with proteinuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and negatively affects the prognosis of renal patients. In the last few years, availability of more specific and effective drugs against HCV has dramatically changed the clinical course of this disease. These drugs may provide further advantages in the CKD population as a whole by reducing progression of renal disease, mortality rate and by increasing the survival of graft in renal transplant recipients. The strict pathogenetic and prognostic link between HCV infection and CKD requires an ongoing relationship among the healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of both HCV infection and CKD. Therefore, Scientific Societies involved in the care of this high-risk population in Italy have organized a joint expert panel. The aim of the panel is to produce a position statement that can be used in daily clinical practice for the management of HCV infected patients across the whole spectrum of renal disease, from the conservative phase to renal replacement treatments (dialysis and transplantation). Sharing specific evidence-based expertise of different professional healthcare is the first step to obtain a common ground of knowledge on which to instate a model for multidisciplinary management of this high-risk population. Statements cover seven areas including epidemiology of CKD, HCV-induced glomerular damage, HCV-related renal risk, staging of liver disease in patients with CKD, prevention of transmission of HCV in hemodialysis units, treatment of HCV infection and management of HCV in kidney transplantation.

Management of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with chronic kidney disease: position statement of the joint committee of Italian association for the study of the liver (AISF), Italian society of internal medicine (SIMI), Italian society of infectious and tropical disease (SIMIT) and Italian society of nephrology (SIN)

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now considered a systemic disease due to the occurrence of extra-hepatic manifestations. Among these, the renal involvement is frequent. HCV infection, in fact, is strongly associated with proteinuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and negatively affects the prognosis of renal patients. In the last few years, availability of more specific and effective drugs against HCV has dramatically changed the clinical course of this disease. These drugs may provide further advantages in the CKD population as a whole by reducing progression of renal disease, mortality rate and by increasing the survival of graft in renal transplant recipients. The strict pathogenetic and prognostic link between HCV infection and CKD requires an ongoing relationship among the healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of both HCV infection and CKD. Therefore, Scientific Societies involved in the care of this high-risk population in Italy have organized a joint expert panel. The aim of the panel is to produce a position statement that can be used in daily clinical practice for the management of HCV infected patients across the whole spectrum of renal disease, from the conservative phase to renal replacement treatments (dialysis and transplantation). Sharing specific evidence-based expertise of different professional healthcare is the first step to obtain a common ground of knowledge on which to instate a model for multidisciplinary management of this high-risk population. Statements cover seven areas including epidemiology of CKD, HCV-induced glomerular damage, HCV-related renal risk, staging of liver disease in patients with CKD, prevention of transmission of HCV in hemodialysis units, treatment of HCV infection and management of HCV in kidney transplantation.

Management of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with chronic kidney disease: position statement of the joint committee of Italian association for the study of the liver (AISF), Italian society of internal medicine (SIMI), Italian society of infectious and tropical disease (SIMIT) and Italian society of nephrology (SIN)

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now considered a systemic disease due to the occurrence of extra-hepatic manifestations. Among these, the renal involvement is frequent. HCV infection, in fact, is strongly associated with proteinuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and negatively affects the prognosis of renal patients. In the last few years, availability of more specific and effective drugs against HCV has dramatically changed the clinical course of this disease. These drugs may provide further advantages in the CKD population as a whole by reducing progression of renal disease, mortality rate and by increasing the survival of graft in renal transplant recipients. The strict pathogenetic and prognostic link between HCV infection and CKD requires an ongoing relationship among the healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of both HCV infection and CKD. Therefore, Scientific Societies involved in the care of this high-risk population in Italy have organized a joint expert panel. The aim of the panel is to produce a position statement that can be used in daily clinical practice for the management of HCV infected patients across the whole spectrum of renal disease, from the conservative phase to renal replacement treatments (dialysis and transplantation). Sharing specific evidence-based expertise of different professional healthcare is the first step to obtain a common ground of knowledge on which to instate a model for multidisciplinary management of this high-risk population. Statements cover seven areas including epidemiology of CKD, HCV-induced glomerular damage, HCV-related renal risk, staging of liver disease in patients with CKD, prevention of transmission of HCV in hemodialysis units, treatment of HCV infection and management of HCV in kidney transplantation.

HCV viraemia in anti-HCV-negative haemodialysis patients: Do we need HCV RNA detection test?

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is still common among dialysis patients, but the natural history of HCV in this group is not completely understood. The KDIGO HCV guidelines of 2009 recommend that chronic haemodialysis patients be screened for HCV antibody upon admission to the dialysis clinic and every 6 months thereafter if susceptible to HCV infection. However, previous studies have shown the presence of HCV viraemia in anti-HCV-negative haemodialysis patients as up to 22%.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the presence of HCV viraemia, using HCV RNA detection, among anti-HCV-negative haemodialysis patients from a tertiary dialysis unit in Athens.

METHODS

We enrolled 41 anti-HCV-negative haemodialysis patients diagnosed with third-generation enzyme immunoassay. HCV viraemia was evaluated using a sensitive (cut-off: 12 IU/mL) reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (COBAS AmpliPrep/TaqMan system) for HCV RNA.

RESULTS

None of the 41 anti-HCV-negative haemodialysis patients were shown to be viraemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine HCV RNA testing appears not to be necessary in anti-HCV-negative haemodialysis patients.

Hepatitis C virus infection in maintenance hemodialysis patients: recommendations for diagnostics and treatment

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly prevalent among patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. It is necessary to determine the HCV genotype and the viral load to monitor the clinical and laboratory features and to establish an optimal antiviral treatment strategy. Antiviral treatments are presented with a standard interferon-based regimen and new direct-acting antiviral agents. The advent of direct-acting antivirals has improved the efficacy and safety of HCV treatment for most patients, even in difficult-to-treat populations such as patients on hemodialysis. HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals in hemodialysis patients is highly effective, with viral eradication rates similar to those seen in patients without chronic kidney disease and with acceptable adverse event profiles.

Relevance of low viral load in haemodialysed patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

AIM

To identify predictors of sustained virological response in hemodialysed patients treated by PEGinterferon α for chronic hepatitis C, genotype 1.

METHODS

The sustained virological response (SVR) rate, IL28B genotype, IFNL4 genotype, initial viral load (IVL) and other pretreatment variables in 39 end-stage renal disease patients (ESRD) on maintenance haemodialysis (HD) infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), genotype 1b, were compared with a control group of 109 patients with normal kidney function treated within the same period. All the patients were treatment naïve and had well compensated liver disease. The ESRD patients received 135 μg of PEGylated interferon α-2a (PegIFN-α) weekly and a reduced dose of ribavirin (RBV) was administered to 23/39 patients with an initial haemoglobin level > 10 g/dL. Control group patients were given standard doses of PegIFN-α and RBV. SVR was assessed as HCV RNA negativity 24 wk post-treatment. A t-test or ANOVA were used for comparisons of the means and a χ(2) test compared the frequencies. Logistic regression was used to determine significant predictors of SVR. Cutoff values for continuous variables were obtained from Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

The distribution of IL28B rs12979860 CC, CT and TT genotypes in the ESRD group was 28.2%, 64.1% and 7.7%, respectively, and 19.3%, 62.4% and 18.3% in the controls. The IFNL4 genotype was in almost absolute linkage disequlibrium with IL28B. The proportion of patients with a low IVL (< 600000 IU/mL) was significantly higher in the ESRD group than in the controls (28/39, 71.8% vs 51/109, 46.8%, P = 0.009), as was the proportion of patients with low IVL in IL28B CC carriers compared with non-CC carriers in the ESRD group (10/11, 90.9% vs 18/28, 64.3%, P = 0.0035). This difference was not found in the controls (7/22, 31.8% vs 44/87, 50.6%, P = 0.9). The overall SVR rate was 64.1% (25/39) in the ESRD group and 50.5% (55/109) in the control group (P = 0.19). 11/11 (100%) and 19/22 (86.4%) IL28B CC patients achieved SVR in the ESRD and control groups, respectively. A statistically significant association between SVR and IL28B and IFNL4 variants was found in both groups. The ESRD patients who achieved SVR showed the lowest IVL [median 21000, interquartile range (IQR): 6000-23000 IU/mL], compared with ESRD individuals without SVR (1680000, IQR: 481000-6880000, P = 0.001), controls with SVR (387000, IQR: 111000-1253000) and controls without SVR (905000, IQR: 451000-3020000). In ESRD, an IVL < 600000 IU/mL was strongly associated with SVR: 24/28 (85.7%) patients who achieved SVR had viraemia below this threshold.

CONCLUSION

Haemodialysis decreases the viral load, especially in IL28B CC genotype carriers. A low IVL was the strongest predictor of SVR in ESRD patients identified in multivariate analysis.

Hepatitis C in hemodialysis patients

Despite reduction of hepatitis C prevalence after recognition of the virus and testing of blood products, hemodialysis (HD) patients still comprise a high risk group. The natural history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in dialysis is not fully understood while the clinical outcome differs from that of the general population. HD patients show a milder liver disease with lower aminotransferase and viral levels depicted by milder histological features on liver biopsy. Furthermore, the “silent” clinical course is consistent with a slower disease progression and a lower frequency of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Potential explanations for the “beneficial” impact of uremia and hemodialysis on chronic HCV infection are impaired immunosurveillance leading to a less aggressive host response to the virus and intradialytic release of “hepatoprotective” cytokines such as interferon (IFN)-α and hepatocyte growth factor. However, chronic hepatitis C is associated with a higher liver disease related cardiovascular and all-cause mortality of HD patients. Therapy is indicated in selected patients groups including younger patients with low comorbidity burden and especially renal transplant candidates, preferably after performance of a liver biopsy. According to current recommendations, choice of treatment is IFN or pegylated interferon with a reported sustained viral response at 30%-40% and a withdrawal rate ranging from 17% to 30%. New data regarding combination therapy with low doses of ribavirin which provide higher standard variable rates and good safety results, offer another therapeutic option. The new protease inhibitors may be the future for HCV infected HD patients, though data are still lacking.

Management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients with end-stage renal disease: a review

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is highly prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, mainly in those on hemodialysis (HD). The seroprevalence of HCV in developing countries ranges between 7% and 40%. Risk factors for this infection in the CKD population include the number of blood transfusions, duration of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and prevalence of HCV in HD. Chronic HCV infection in patients with ESRD is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality in the pre and post kidney transplant periods. The increase in mortality is directly associated with liver complications and an elevated cardiovascular risk in HCV-infected patients on hemodialysis. Antiviral treatment may improve the prognosis of patients with HCV, and standard interferon remains the cornerstone of treatment. Treatment of HCV in patients with CKD is complex, but achieving a sustained viral response may decrease the frequency of complications after transplantation. It appears that HCV-infected patients who remain on maintenance dialysis are at increased risk of death compared with HCV patients undergoing renal transplantation.

Histological features of chronic hepatitis C in haemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

HCV infection in haemodialysis (HD) patients is still a matter of investigation. The aim of this study was to determine the histology of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in HCV-infected HD patients within the context of a comparative analysis including non-uraemic patients with CHC. The relative importance of virological, demographic and clinical parameters on disease manifestation was examined.

METHODS

Sixty-one consecutive liver biopsies from HD patients and 326 from non-uraemic patients with chronic HCV infection were comparatively evaluated.

RESULTS

Haemodialysis patients with CHC were older than control subjects (P = 0.031), showing a similar HCV genotype distribution (P = 0.328) and lower viral load (P = 0.001). CHC in HD patients was significantly milder according to stage (P = 0.033), grade and its parameters (periportal activity, portal inflammation and lobular activity) (P < 0.001). The frequency of lymphoid aggregates (10.2% vs. 50%, P < 0.001), bile duct lesions (1.7% vs. 22.1%, P < 0.001) and extent of steatosis (P = 0.022) in HD group was significantly reduced. Multivariate analysis showed that non-uraemic patients had 2.3 times higher risk of developing steatosis independently of genotype distribution and age. In HD group, genotype 3, longer HD duration and age at infection were significantly associated with steatosis, while older age at infection correlated with advanced fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic hepatitis C in HD patients is usually very mild, losing its diagnostic histological features while patient's age and age at infection retain their prognostic significance. The weak inflammatory response, probably because of immunocompromised status and low viral load, may present a beneficial factor in the natural course of the disease.

Interferon therapy of acute hepatitis C in dialysis patients: meta-analysis

The efficacy and safety of antiviral therapy in patients with acute hepatitis C on long-term dialysis remains unclear, although a number of small clinical studies have been published addressing this issue. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of interferon therapy in chronic dialysis patients with acute hepatitis C by performing a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical studies. The primary outcome was sustained virological response (SVR, as a measure of efficacy); the secondary outcome was dropout rate (as a measure of tolerability). We used the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. We identified eight clinical studies (173 unique patients), three (37.5%) being controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Among CCTs, the viral response was much more common in study (patients on antiviral therapy) than control (patients who did not receive therapy) groups; the pooled odds ratio of SVR being 27.06, 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI), 9.26; 79.1 (P = 0.00001). No difference in the dropout rate between study and control patients was shown, odds ratio = 0.920 (95% CI, 0.367; 1.92), NS. Pooling all study results (n = 8 studies) demonstrated that the summary estimate for SVR and dropout rate was 58% (95% CI, 38; 77) and 9% (95% CI, 4; 14), respectively. The most frequent side-effects requiring interruption of the treatment were flu-like symptoms (n = 4, 18%), followed by haematological changes and loss to follow-up. A strong relationship between increasing age and reported dropout rate was recognized (P = 0.001). The studies were heterogeneous with regard to SVR but not to dropout rate. Our meta-analysis of CCTs showed that the viral response after antiviral therapy was more common than the spontaneous viral clearance in dialysis patients with acute hepatitis C. Pooled analysis demonstrated that IFN-based therapy of acute hepatitis C in dialysis populations gives SVR in around one half of patients. These results support IFN-based therapy for acute hepatitis C in patients on maintenance dialysis.

Transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) for the assessment of viremia in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C

The diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in hemodialysis patients is difficult particularly due to the presence of intermittent viremia. The aims of this study were: (a) to determine the prevalence of intermittent viremia in hemodialysis patients with anti-HCV antibodies who tested negative for HCV RNA by PCR at the first evaluation and (b) to evaluate the contribution of the transcription-mediated amplification method (TMA) to the diagnosis of viremia in the PCR-negative samples. One hundred and six patients with anti-HCV antibodies and an initial negative result for HCV RNA by PCR were included. An additional sample was collected for a second HCV RNA test by PCR after a minimum interval of 3 months and a positive result characterized intermittent viremia. HCV RNA was investigated by TMA in the PCR-negative sample of patients with intermittent viremia, and in the most recent sample from patients with PCR-negative results in both determinations. Intermittent viremia was observed in 60/106 (57%) patients (57% men; age: 45 ± 10 years). Fifty-one of the 60 negative samples from patients with intermittent viremia and 29/46 double-negative patients were tested by TMA. This assay detected viremia in 20/51 (39%) samples of intermittent viremia and in 2/29 (7%) of double-negative samples. The results showed that intermittent viremia is frequent in hemodialysis patients who tested negative for HCV RNA by PCR. Therefore, a second HCV RNA test is necessary for all HCV RNA-negative patients. The TMA assay appears to be the best first screening test for viremia in this population.

Kinetics of hepatitis C virus load and hemodialysis: is there any influence of the reuse of dialysis membrane on HCV viremia?

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on regular hemodialysis are at increased risk of acquiring hepatitis C virus (HCV). Although controversial, a distinct dynamic of the HCV load has been reported in this group - a lower HCV viremia compared to non-uremic patients. The reasons for this remain unclear, but the host immune response related to the hemodialysis procedure and the reuse of dialysis membranes are the most investigated factors.

METHODS

We analyzed the kinetics of HCV RNA viremia in 21 hemodialysis patients infected with genotype 1, through a highly sensitive quantitative method (real-time polymerase chain reaction), immediately before and at the end of the first use and the last reuse of the cellulose diacetate dialysis membrane.

RESULTS

Initial HCV load did not correlate with demographic or biochemical parameters, but higher HCV viremia was associated with a longer time on hemodialysis (r = 0.44, p = 0.04). Although not significant, HCV RNA decreased in 11/21 (52.3%) patients after the first dialysis session (median 279,000 vs 176,000 IU/ml, p = 0.91). However, a significant increase in HCV RNA viremia was observed in 17/21 (80.9%) patients after the tenth session (median 187,000 vs 342,000 IU/ml, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Except for the first session of hemodialysis, we did not confirm a decrease in HCV viremia related to the time on hemodialysis or with the reuse of the dialysis membrane. Factors other than the reuse of the dialysis membrane might be involved in the multifaceted kinetics of HCV RNA in CKD patients on hemodialysis.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with end-stage renal disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health problem in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The incidence of acute HCV infection during maintenance dialysis is much higher than that in the general population because of the risk of nosocomial transmission. Following acute HCV infection, most patients develop chronic HCV infection, and a significant proportion develop chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma. Overall, chronic hepatitis C patients on hemodialysis bear an increased risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality, either during dialysis or after renal transplantation. Interferon (IFN) therapy is modestly effective for the treatment of HCV infection in ESRD patients. Conventional or pegylated IFN monotherapy has been used to treat acute hepatitis C in ESRD patients with excellent safety and efficacy. Regarding chronic hepatitis C, approximately one-third of patients can achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) after conventional or pegylated IFN monotherapy. The combination of low-dose ribavirin and conventional or pegylated IFN has further improved the SVR rate in treatment-naïve or retreated ESRD patients in clinical trials. Similar to the treatment of patients with normal renal function, baseline and on-treatment HCV virokinetics are useful to guide optimized therapy in ESRD patients. Of particular note, IFN-based therapy is not recommended at the post-renal transplantation stage because of the low SVR rate and risk of acute graft rejection. In conclusion, ESRD patients with HCV infection should be encouraged to receive antiviral therapy, and those who achieve an SVR usually have long-term, durable, virological, biochemical, and histological responses.

Prevalence and risk factors of hepatitis B and C viruses among haemodialysis patients in Gaza strip, Palestine

Background

The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) and its associated risk factors among haemodialysis (HD) patients in Gaza strip was investigated using serological and molecular techniques.

Results

The overall prevalence of HBV among the four HD centers was 8.1%. The main risk factors were HD center (p = 0.05), history of blood transfusion (p < 0.01), and treatment abroad (p = 0.01). The overall prevalence of HCV among the four HD centers was 22%. The main risk factors were HD center (p < 0.01), time duration on HD (p < 0.01), history of blood transfusion (p < 0.01), treatment abroad (p < 0.01), and history of blood transfusion abroad (p < 0.01). Serum aminotransferases levels decreased in HD patients compared with normal population but still there was a direct association between the activity of liver enzymes and both HBV (p < 0.01) and HCV (p < 0.01) infection.

Conclusion

The much higher prevalence of Hepatitis viruses among HD patients compared to the normal population of Gaza strip indicates a causative relation between HD and hepatitis viruses transmission. Therefore extremely careful observation of preventive infection control measures is essential to limit Hepatitis viruses' transmission in HD centers.

Impact of hemodialysis therapy on hepatitis C virus infection: a deeper insight

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection remains prevalent in patients receiving regular dialysis all over the world. The adverse impact of anti-HCV serologic status on mortality in the dialysis population has been documented. Antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, including the dialysis population, is still unsatisfactory. Several findings support a different course of HCV in dialysis patients versus the non-uremic population. The HCV viral load appears lower in hemodialysis patients with HCV despite the immune compromise caused by chronic uremia; the histologic abnormalities seem milder, and a severe clinical course of chronic hepatitis C is unusual in most hemodialysis (HD) patients. It appears that the HD procedure per se can preserve patients from an aggressive course of HCV by reducing the viral load (HCV RNA). The mechanisms by which the HD procedure lowers HCV viremia remain largely speculative: the passage of viral particles into the dialysate, the trapping of the virus on the surface of the dialyzer membrane, and an indirect host-mediated mechanism have been cited. The latter hypothesis implicates the production of interferon-alpha, hepatocyte growth factor, or other cytokines provided with antiviral activities during the hemodialysis sessions. Clinical trials aimed at clarifying this issue are under way.

Hemodialysis reduces the viral load in uremic patients with chronic hepatitis B infection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The effect of hemodialysis (HD) to change the viral load of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in uremic patients with chronic HBV infection has never been studied. In this study, we investigated the HBV viral loads and their changes between the HD procedure in the uremic patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 38 chronic HBV-infected uremic patients were enrolled, but eight cases were excluded due to HCV co-infection and under anti-viral therapy. To evaluate the HBV DNA levels and their changes through the course of HD, we quantified serial serum samples from each patient immediately before HD, at the end of HD, and 48 hours later--immediately before the next HD.

RESULTS

Most of our HBV-infected uremic patients had a relatively lower HBV viral load; 80% cases with HBV DNA <or=4 Log(10)copies/mL, in comparison with the Taiwan epidemiologic study for community base HBV carriers. There was no significant difference of HBV DNA level between HBeAg-positive and -negative patients, but a significant higher DNA level in the high ALT group (p = 0.029) and liver cirrhosis patients (p = 0.002). The mean HBV DNA levels, before and after HD, respectively, in our 30 patients were 3.823 +/- 1.130 Log(10)copies/mL and 3.686 +/- 1.114 Log(10)copies/mL. It was a significant decrease on HBV DNA level in chronic HBV-infected patients through HD procedure (p = 0.004). The mean HBV DNA level of two days after HD was 3.702 +/- 1.094 Log(10)copies/mL, which was not significantly different from the HBV DNA level before (p = 0.076) or after (p = 0.267) HD; however, the mean reduction of HBV DNA by a single HD was 0.11 +/- 0.38 Log(10)copies/mL. Patients with low viral load also had a significant high platelet count (p = 0.03), high serum albumin (p = 0.016), and low AST level (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Most uremic patients with chronic HBV infection under regular HD in Taiwan had a relatively lower viral load, of which the major mechanism could be due to the elimination of serum HBV viral load by the HD procedure.

Hepatitis C among predialysis patients: prevalence and characteristics in a large cohort of patients

BACKGROUND

The factors associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in predialysis patients need to be better investigated. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence, risk factors, clinical, biochemical and virological characteristics of chronic HCV infection in predialysis patients.

METHODS

Anti-HCV antibodies were determined in a large cohort of predialysis patients. Epidemiological and laboratorial characteristics of HCV infection were evaluated in predialysis patients and this group was matched to a control group consisting of predialysis patients without viral infection (1:3) and compared in terms of risk factors and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify variables independently associated with chronic HCV infection.

RESULTS

A total of 1,041 patients (61% males) with a mean age of 61 +/- 15 years and mean creatinine clearance of 36 +/- 18 ml/min were included. Forty-one (3.9%) patients were anti-HCV positive and, of these, 39 (95%) presented viremia. Predialysis patients with HCV more frequently showed a history of blood transfusion before 1992 (66.7 vs. 10.3%; p < 0.001) and major surgeries (53.8 vs. 17.1%; p < 0.001), a higher proportion of undetermined etiology of kidney disease (43.6 vs. 17.1%; p = 0.001), and higher ALT levels (1.3 vs. 0.4 xULN; p < 0.001). History of blood transfusion before 1992 (p < 0.001; OR: 19), intravenous drug abuse (p = 0.002; OR: 69) and ALT levels (p < 0.001; OR: 50) were the variables that were independently associated with chronic HCV infection. The accuracy of ALT in detecting HCV infection was 92%. The most prevalent HCV genotype was 1b (48.7%) and 56.5% of patients presented high HCV viral load.

CONCLUSION

Chronic HCV infection among predialysis patients is related to increased parenteral exposure. Elevated ALT levels suggest the need for HCV screening as part of the predialysis care since ALT seems to be a good marker of this infection.

The treatment of chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin in haemodialysed patients awaiting renal transplant

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We undertook a pilot study to investigate the efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin in haemodialysed chronic HCV patients awaiting renal transplant.

METHODS

Patients received peginterferon alfa-2a 135 microg/week plus ribavirin 200 mg/day for 24 or 48 weeks (genotype non-1 and 1, respectively). The dose of ribavirin was tailored according to plasma concentrations and to haemoglobin levels. Outcomes in treated patients were compared with those of a matched untreated control group.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients received treatment, while 35 served as untreated controls. Thirty patients completed treatment; patients were withdrawn due to transplantation (n=2), severe anaemia (n=1), dermatitis (n=1) and non-response (n=1) resulting in a drop-out rate of 14%. Overall, 34/35 treated patients were HCV RNA negative at week 4 and had undetectable RNA at the end of treatment, compared with none of the untreated controls (ETR 97% vs 0%; p<0.001). Moreover, all achieved sustained virological response after 24 weeks of treatment-free follow-up versus no control patients (SVR 97% vs 0 %; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we have shown for the first time in a large cohort of patients that HCV-patients on haemodialysis can be treated successfully with peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin.

Hepatitis C in chronic kidney disease: predialysis patients present more severe histological liver injury than hemodialysis patients?

BACKGROUND

The characteristics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in predialysis patients are poorly understood and they could be different from hemodialysis patients.

AIMS

To evaluate the demographics, laboratory and histological characteristics of chronic HCV infection in predialysis patients and to compare them with those observed in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Thirty-nine predialysis patients with chronic HCV infection were compared to HCV-infected hemodialysis patients (ratio of 1:3) in terms of demographics, laboratory and histological characteristics. The fibrosis progression rate (FPR) was calculated as the ratio between fibrosis stage and duration of infection.

RESULTS

Predialysis patients were older (57 +/- 10 vs. 45 +/- 12 years; p < 0.001), presented a higher proportion of elevated alanine aminotransferase (71.8 vs. 41.0%; p = 0.001) and aspartate aminotransferase (64.1 vs. 26.5%; p < 0.001), a higher proportion of interface hepatitis (66.7 vs. 47%; p = 0.033) and more advanced fibrosis (71.8 vs. 16.2%; p = 0.001). Among patients with estimated duration of infection, predialysis patients presented a longer duration of infection (22 vs. 6 years; p < 0.001) and no difference in FPR was observed between groups (p = 0.692).

CONCLUSION

Although predialysis patients with HCV infection present more severe histological injury than hemodialysis patients, this finding probably reflects a longer duration of infection with no evidence supporting that hepatitis C presents a more aggressive course in this group.

Distribution of HCV genotypes in patients with end-stage renal disease according to type of dialysis treatment

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of types of dialysis treatments on hepatitis C virus infection and the epidemiologic properties of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection at three Baskent University hospitals, in Ankara, Adana, and Izmir, Turkey, in 655, 326, and 118 patients with end-stage renal disease, respectively. One hundred thirty patients with HCV viremia among 271 patients with end-stage renal disease seropositive for HCV were included in this cross-sectional study. HCV RNA-positive patients were classified according to the renal replacement therapies (hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis), and viral load, transaminase levels, and distribution of genotypes were compared between these subgroups. In the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis group, 26 of 165 patients (16%) were serum anti-HCV positive, and 11 of 26 patients (42%) were serum HCV RNA positive. Twenty-six percent of the patients undergoing hemodialysis were anti-HCV positive, and 49% were HCV RNA positive. The prevalence of genotype 1b was 68% and 73% for patients in the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis groups, respectively. No significant differences were found between the genotype 1b and the non-1b groups or between different dialysis types with regard to age and sex and serum aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase, and HCV RNA levels. We conclude that HCV seropositivity may differ between different types of dialysis treatments, although viral load and genotypes may be similar in persons with end-stage renal disease and those without.

HCV-RNA qualitative assay based on transcription mediated amplification improves the detection of hepatitis C virus infection in patients on hemodialysis: results from five hemodialysis units in central Greece

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease patients (ESRD) on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) are at increased risk of acquiring hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. An early and accurate diagnosis of HCV infection is important for the prevention of viral transmission and the management of ESRD patients on HD but conventional ELISA and PCR have often failed to reveal active HCV infection.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the prevalence of HCV infection in ESRD patients from all HD units in central Greece using a sensitive HCV-RNA transcription mediated amplification (TMA) assay and compared its sensitivity with that of anti-HCV ELISA.

STUDY DESIGN

Anti-HCV antibody (third generation ELISA), HCV-RNA (TMA) and HCV genotypes (HCV TMA-LiPA) were determined in 366 ESRD Greek patients.

RESULTS

In total, 132 (36%) ESRD patients were HCV positive by ELISA or TMA; 44 by TMA alone, 16 by ELISA alone and 72 positive by both assays. More than half of the viraemic patients had genotype 3a.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV-RNA (TMA) assay appears to increase the accuracy in the diagnosis of HCV infection in HD patients compared to the anti-HCV ELISA and could serve as an additional screening tool in these patients.

Incidence and patterns of hepatitis C virus seroconversion in a cohort of hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this multicenter hemodialysis (HD) cohort study is to prospectively investigate the incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Greece from 1993 to 1995 and delineate early virological and serological events associated with HCV seroconversion in the HD setting.

METHODS

Sequential serum samples collected weekly from 562 patients were tested biochemically and serologically by means of a second- (EIA-2) and third-generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA-3). All patients with positive antibody to HCV test results (anti-HCV + ) and sequential samples from seroconverting patients were tested for HCV RNA.

RESULTS

Anti-HCV prevalence at study entry was 29% (163 of 562 patients), and viremia was detectable in 110 of 163 anti-HCV + patients (67.5%). HCV incidence was 6.2 cases/100 person-years. Seroconversions could not be attributed to transfusions after study entry (only 1 patient had been administered transfusion), and HD unit was associated with increased hazard for seroconversion ( P = 0.002), even after adjusting for potential differences among their patients. According to Kaplan-Meier estimation, the median interval by which the HCV RNA assay detected HCV infection earlier than anti-HCV testing was 246 and 154 days for EIA-2 and EIA-3, respectively. Detectable HCV RNA and at least 2 consecutive abnormal alanine aminotransferase levels in the preseroconversion period were observed in 29 of 30 (97%) and 14 of 32 patients (44%), respectively. Reductions in HCV RNA levels immediately after seroconversion were transient or did not occur.

CONCLUSION

On the grounds of apparent nosocomial transmission, the wide window period of HCV infection in HD patients emphasizes the need for strict adherence to specific infection-control measures in this setting.

Confirmation of nosocomial hepatitis C virus infection in a hemodialysis unit

OBJECTIVES

To investigate a hepatitis C virus (HCV) outbreak in a hemodialysis unit and determine the source of transmission.

METHODS

We have prospectively investigated the epidemiology of hemodialysis-related HCV infection in a single unit since 1989. In September 2000, acute hepatitis C (AH-C) was diagnosed in 5 patients by alanine aminotransferase elevation and HCV genotype 1b viremia without antibody to HCV. We surveyed the epidemiologic situation and performed polymerase chain reaction sequence analysis of the HCV 5'-noncoding (5'NC) region in the patients for comparison with 9 patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b viremia.

RESULTS

Sequence analysis of the 5'NC region showed the consistency in the 5 independent clones from each AH-C patient and those from each chronic HCV viremia patient and no quasispecies over time in the clones of any of 14 analyzed patients. All AH-C patients had the same sequencing of the 6 variations in the region with the only other patient. A saline ampoule, used for heparin solution during hemodialysis, had a recap function. It was difficult to determine whether the ampoule was new or had already been used. The source-patient often underwent hemodialysis before the AH-C patients and most of their hemodialysis-related medicine was prepared during the source-patient's treatment. These findings suggested a high possibility that the AH-C patients shared a single heparin-saline solution ampoule contaminated by HCV from the source-patient.

CONCLUSION

Nosocomial HCV infection occurred as a result of poor infection control practice when a patient with chronic HCV viremia received treatment prior to other hemodialysis patients.

Influence of hemodialysis procedure on HCV RNA detection in serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells

AIM

To assess whether hemodialysis procedure induces qualitative or quantitative changes in hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA.

METHODS

We obtained blood samples in the 10 HCV RNA-positive patients of our hemodialysis unit before (sample I) and 5 min after a dialysis session (sample II), and before the next dialysis session (sample III). HCV RNA was tested by PCR in serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Serum viral load was measured by branched-DNA assay.

RESULTS

Serum HCV RNA was positive in samples I, II and III of the 10 patients. PBMC HCV RNA was detected in samples I, II and III of seven patients. Mean viral load was 1.43+/-0.99 Meq genome/mL in sample I, 0.86+/-0.40 Meq genome/mL in sample II and 1.27+/-0.56 Meq genome/mL in sample III.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV load was low in most HCV RNA-positive patients. It had a downward trend during dialysis procedure but HCV RNA remained detectable in all serum samples and in most PBMC samples. Therefore, qualitative HCV RNA seems to be better than viral load to assess HCV infection in hemodialysis patients.

Natural history of chronic hepatitis C in patients on hemodialysis: Case control study with 4-23 years of follow-up

AIM: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is very common among end-stage kidney disease patients on hemodialysis, but its natural history is not known.

METHODS: In this study, 189 dialysis patients (case) positive for HCV antibodies who were followed up for more than 4 years were compared with twice as many sex/age matched controls with chronic hepatitis C who were diagnosed in the same month as the case and followed up for comparable periods. The longest follow-up was 23 years in dialysis cases. The disease activities were graded into “asymptomatic” if ALT was less than 40 (35 in cases) IU/L, “low activities” if ALT was 40 (35)-79 IU/L, and “high activities” if ALT was above 80 IU/L during the last or latest 4 year period.

RESULTS: All 25 dialysis cases who were followed up for more than 15 years were asymptomatic and 15 of them were negative for HCV RNA. Of the 50 controls followed up for more than 15 years, 34 had high activities, and none cleared HCV RNA. There were 60 controls who were asymptomatic, but they were all positive for HCV RNA, while 22.3% of asymptomatic dialysis cases were RNA negative. No dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C progressed to cirrhosis, whereas the disease progressed to cirrhosis in more than one quarter of the controls. These differences were highly significant (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: Chronic hepatitic C among hemodialysis patients is mild in disease activity, and is not progressive, perhaps due to immunological abnormalities in these patients. Hepatic C virus is frequently cleared in asymptomatic dialysis patients during a long course. A possible mechanism for viral clearance is viral particle destruction on the surface of the dialyzer membrane.

Granulocyte and Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis for Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Report on Six Cases with High Plasma Viremia

Granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages (GM) are known to constitute extra-hepatic sites for hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication and dissemination. Accordingly, we thought that selective GM adsorptive apheresis (GMA) might contribute to the treatment of HCV in patients with high viremia (HCV-RNA > 100 kIU/mL). Of six patients (three males and three females), mean age 62.2 years, five had not responded to interferon-alpha (INF-alpha) and one was INF-alpha naïve. Each patient received five GMA sessions, once a week for 5 weeks. The two antecubital veins were used as blood access and return lines and the apheresis was performed at 30 mL/min for 60 min. Treatment efficacy was assessed by monitoring changes in plasma HCV-RNA and aminotransferase. Granulocyte and monocyte/macrophage adsorptive apheresis was well tolerated. During each GMA, there was on average a 52.9% fall in plasma HCV-RNA, but HCV-RNA increased again during the time before the next GMA. There was no marked change in either aminotransferase during GMA. Furthermore, beyond the last GMA, HCV-RNA increased together with worsening aminotransferase in three of six patients. In conclusion, it would appear that GMA can partially reduce plasma HCV and GMA at a frequency of one session/week for 5 consecutive weeks but that this was inadequate to induce a sustained decrease in plasma HCV-RNA in patients with high viremia without simultaneous administration of antiviral medications. The most effective frequency of GMA needs to be determined in future clinical studies.

TT-virus infection in Japanese general population and in hemodialysis patients

To determine TT virus (TTV) prevalence and the persistence of viremia, we prospectively did cross-sectional and longitudinal studies using by the polymerase chain reaction to test the successive sera of 150 Japanese hemodialysis patients and compared these with those of 166 residents of a rural Japanese area endemic for hepatitis C virus (HCV). TTV DNA positivity was significantly higher in 50 (30.1%) of the residents than in 25 (16.7%) of the patients in 1997 (P < 0.05). TTV DNA positively in the patients was not associated with HCV RNA positivity and also increased with the number of blood transfusions and decreased with the duration of hemodialysis, but not significantly. Longitudinal study from 1997 to 1999 showed that persistent TTV DNA positivity was found significantly more often in 35 (21.1%) of the residents than in 13 (8.6%) of the patients (P < 0.05), and that persistent TTV DNA negativity was found significantly more often in 103 (68.7%) of the patients than in 91 (54.8%) of the residents (P < 0.05). Of the 25 patients and 50 residents TTV DNA positive in 1997, TTV DNA was eliminated more often in 12 (48.0%) patients than in 15 (30.0%) residents over the three years, but the difference was not significant. The route of TTV transmission might differ from HCV in that it could be nonparenteral. TTV was less prevalent in hemodialysis patients than residents, and the virus was more often eliminated by hemodialysis patients than by residents during the three-year observation period, possibly because of the effect of the hemodialysis procedure.

Characteristics of hepatitis C in renal transplant candidates

GOALS

To characterize hepatitis C in renal transplant candidates and to compare hepatitis C-related liver disease between patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and well-matched control subjects without renal disease.

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is common in dialysis patients and can cause morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. Patients with advanced hepatitis C often are excluded from renal transplantation.

STUDY

Forty-six renal transplant candidates and 46 control subjects matched for age, sex, and race without renal disease were included. Demographic, laboratory, and histologic data were compared between patients with ESRD and control subjects.

RESULTS

Alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly lower in patients with ESRD (p < 0.001). Hepatitis C virus RNA levels were similar between groups. Patients with ESRD had less inflammatory activity (p < 0.001) and a lower proportion of bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis (13%) than control subjects (30%, p = 0.043). Clinical and laboratory features did not predict histologic grade or stage of hepatitis C in patients with ESRD. Two complications of percutaneous liver biopsy occurred per three diagnoses of cirrhosis in patients with ESRD. No complications occurred with transjugular liver biopsy in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ESRD had less severe hepatitis C than did control subjects. Clinical measurements did not predict histologic findings in renal transplant candidates. Transjugular liver biopsy should be considered to stage hepatitis C in renal transplant candidates due to the risk of percutaneous biopsy in uremic patients.

Hepatitis C screening strategies in hemodialysis patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis, with an estimated yearly incidence of 0.2% and prevalence between 8% and 10%. Although a screening strategy based on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values is currently recommended, this strategy has not been evaluated for cost-effectiveness compared with other potential screening strategies. A comparison therefore was made using a decision-analysis model of a simulated cohort of 5,000 hemodialysis patients followed up for 5 years. Using direct medical costs, three strategies were evaluated, including: (1) ALT values with confirmatory testing (biochemical), (2) serial enzyme-linked immunosorbent and strip immunoblot assay testing (serological), and (3) polymerase chain reaction (viral). Under baseline assumptions, the per-patient cost of screening hemodialysis patients for HCV was $378 for biochemical-based testing, $195 for serological-based testing, and $696 for viral-based testing. Our model was robust when varying the costs of testing, as well as the incidence and prevalence of HCV infection. Results of sensitivity analysis by varying costs, HCV incidence, and HCV prevalence indicated that serological-based screening was less costly than biochemical testing. Biochemical testing was in turn less costly than viral-based screening. Serological-based testing was also more effective in the diagnosis of de novo HCV infection, with a likelihood ratio of 85, in contrast to the likelihood ratio of 44 with biochemical-based testing using viral-based screening as the gold standard. A serological-based screening strategy is less costly and more effective than biochemical-based screening in the diagnosis of de novo HCV infection. Serological-based screening should be considered for HCV screening in hemodialysis populations.

Acute hepatitis C among Japanese hemodialysis patients: a prospective 9-year study

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this prospective survey were to determine the incidence and clinical characteristics of newly acquired hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in hemodialysis patients after the start of antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) screening for blood products in Japan in 1989.

METHODS

In serial serum samples from 269 hemodialysis patients who were followed over a mean period of 6.6 yr (+/- 2.1 yr) from 1990 to 1998, HCV RNA and anti-HCV were detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and second generation ELISA, respectively.

RESULTS

During the observation period, newly acquired HCV infection was found in 26 (15.4%) of the 169 hemodialysis patients without anti-HCV or HCV RNA at entry, an annual incidence rate of 2.59%. Of these 26, only four had a history of blood transfusion, one of whom had received the blood transfusion after 1992, the year in which screening of blood products for anti-HCV by second-generation ELISA was introduced in Japan. Persistent HCV viremia was found in 17 (65.4%) of the 26 patients; the other nine (34.6%) had transient HCV infection. The mean period of continuous ALT abnormality was significantly longer in the former (12.4+/-13.6 months) than in the latter (1.9+/-3.5 months) (p = 0.0067). However, only three (17.6%) of 17 patients with chronic HCV viremia had continuous ALT abnormality for more than 24 months; in all of them, ALT eventually normalized.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that newly acquired HCV infection has continued to occur in hemodialysis patients after the initiation of anti-HCV screening of blood products and that the abnormal ALT found in these patients is related to HCV chronicity.