Survey of internal medicine residents' use of the fecal occult blood test and their understanding of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance

Evaluation of fecal occult blood testing for rapid diagnosis of invasive diarrhea in young children

Antimicrobials are only indicated in acute childhood diarrhea if it is invasive or persistent. Rapid screening for invasive diarrhea can therefore inform treatment decisions but pathogen identification by culture is slow, expensive and cumbersome. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of stool microscopy and immunochromatographic fecal occult blood test (FOBT) kits for identifying invasive or potentially invasive diarrhea in Ibadan, Nigeria. Fecal specimens from 46 children under 5 years old with diarrhea, collected as part of ongoing case-control studies, were subjected to stool microscopy for erythrocytes and leucocytes, and FOBT using the innovator's product and four locally procurable generic immunochromatographic kits, each according to manufacturers' instructions. Stool specimens were cultured for enteric bacterial pathogens using standard procedures. Presumptive pathogen isolates were identified biochemically and by PCR, and then confirmed by whole genome sequencing. Shigella, enteroinvasive Escherichia coli and Yersinia, pathogens that invariably cause invasive diarrhea, were detected in five of 46 specimens. Occult blood detection by microscopy was 55.6% sensitive and 78.4% specific, while the innovator's FOBT product was respectively 62.5% and 81.6% sensitive and specific compared to strict invasive pathogen recovery. Microscopy and FOBT testing were less sensitive in identifying specimens that contained pathogens that do not always elicit invasive diarrhea. Generic FOBT tests compared well with the innovator's product. Microscopy and FOBT testing have some value for delineating likely invasive diarrheas. They could inform treatment and serve as early warning indicators for dysentery outbreaks in resource limited settings. Inexpensive, generic FOBT kits that are locally procurable in Nigeria performed as well as the innovator's product.

Use of Fecal Occult Blood Testing as a Diagnostic Tool for Clinical Indications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) are validated only for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but are commonly used as a diagnostic test in other clinical settings. We performed a systematic review to assess performance characteristics of FOBT as a diagnostic test for clinical indications.

METHODS

Bibliographic databases were searched to identify studies in adult patients with a specific gastrointestinal symptom or condition who underwent FOBT and a reference test and provided data on diagnoses. Our primary end point was sensitivity. Risk of bias was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria: 12 in iron deficiency anemia (IDA) (5 fecal immunochemical (FIT) and 7 guaiac based), 8 in ulcerative colitis (FIT), and 2 in acute diarrhea (guaiac based). Only 2 studies had low risk of bias on all domains of the QUADAS-2. On meta-analysis, FOBT had a sensitivity of 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.63) and a specificity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.89) in predicting presumptive causes of IDA at endoscopy, with comparable results for guaiac-based tests and FIT. Sensitivity was higher for CRC (0.83) than non-CRC lesions (0.54). FIT had a sensitivity of 0.72 (95% CI 0.57-0.84) and a specificity of 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.89) in predicting endoscopic activity in UC. Sensitivities of FOBT for positive stool culture in acute diarrhea were 0.38 and 0.87.

DISCUSSION

Sensitivity of FOBT is poor for IDA: 42% of patients with identifiable causes of IDA had false-negative FOBT. Our results did not show acceptable performance characteristics for FOBT to guide decisions regarding endoscopic evaluation and do not support its use in IDA.

Improving Internal Medicine Residents' Colorectal Cancer Screening Knowledge Using a Smartphone App: Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. About one in three adults in the United States is not getting the CRC screening as recommended. Internal medicine residents are deficient in CRC screening knowledge.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to assess the improvement in internal medicine residents' CRC screening knowledge via a pilot approach using a smartphone app.

METHODS

We designed a questionnaire based on the CRC screening guidelines of the American Cancer Society, American College of Gastroenterology, and US Preventive Services Task Force. We emailed the questionnaire via a SurveyMonkey link to all the residents of an internal medicine department to assess their knowledge of CRC screening guidelines. Then we designed an educational intervention in the form of a smartphone app containing all the knowledge about the CRC screening guidelines. The residents were introduced to the app and asked to download it onto their smartphones. We repeated the survey to test for changes in the residents' knowledge after publication of the smartphone app and compared the responses with the previous survey. We applied the Pearson chi-square test and the Fisher exact test to look for statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 50 residents completed the first survey and 41 completed the second survey after publication of the app. Areas of CRC screening that showed statistically significant improvement (P<.05) were age at which CRC screening was started in African Americans, preventive tests being ordered first, identification of CRC screening tests, identification of preventive and detection methods, following up positive tests with colonoscopy, follow-up after colonoscopy findings, and CRC surveillance in diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

In this modern era of smartphones and gadgets, developing a smartphone-based app or educational tool is a novel idea and can help improve residents' knowledge about CRC screening.

Knowledge, attitude, and practices of primary health care physicians toward colorectal cancer screening

BACKGROUND/AIM

Early diagnosis of chronic illnesses and cancers mainly occurs at primary health care centers (PHCs) by primary health care physicians (PHPs). The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is rising and this has been attributed to many factors. The increasing incidence of CRC is compounded by nonadherence to screening recommendations. Therefore, evaluating PHPs knowledge, attitudes, and practices of screening for CRC is clinically important. We aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of PHPs regarding CRC screening and to identify the factors associated with nonadherence of PHPs to screening recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PHPs working at three tertiary care centers and PHCs across the city of Jeddah were randomly recruited. Participants were surveyed using a comprehensive questionnaire that recorded data on demographics, qualifications, and knowledge of various modalities and guidelines related to CRC screening. Perspectives about effectiveness of, or adherence to, factors that influence physicians' perspectives or recommendations for CRC screening were also assessed. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify physician characteristics associated with PHPs perspectives and nonadherence to CRC screening.

RESULTS

A total of 127 PHPs were recruited. The average age of participants was 34 (±8.4) years, 86.6% were native Saudi's and 56.7% were females. The majority of surveys (66.9%) were completed at 24 PHCs and the remaining at hospital-based family medicine clinics. Most of the PHPs (55%) had a bachelor's degree and 31.5% were board-certified or carried a PhD in family medicine; 95% of participants believed that CRC screening in general was effective, but as much as 55% reported that they did not practice screening. The male physicians [odds ratio (OR) = 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.19-0.99, P = 0.048)] and PHPs with only a bachelor degree or less (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.93, P = 0.011) were less likely to recommend screening for CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable proportion of PHPs do not adhere to CRC screening recommendations despite a wide belief that screening is effective. Male PHPs with lower qualifications appear to be less likely to recommend screening.

Physician Recommendations for Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests

Following a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT), physician recommendation of complete diagnostic evaluation (CDE) is an important first step to ensure identification and treatment of preinvasive or invasive colorectal cancer. Physicians may not recommend CDE, however, potentially compromising the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programs and the quality of care for individual patients. The authors used a theoretical model of health behavior and two national physician samples to explore factors associated with recommendations for CDE. Overall, 63 percent of the sample of physicians providing primary care and 76 percent of the gastroenterologist and general surgeon sample reported recommending CDE. Variables representing the theoretical model constructs of physician background, experience, and practice patterns; practice environment; physician psychosocial representations; and patient characteristics were significantly associated with recommendations of CDE. Development of interventions to improve recommendations of CDE is an important area for future research.

Fecal occult blood testing as a diagnostic test in symptomatic patients is not useful: a retrospective chart review

BACKGROUND

The fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is a screening tool designed for the early detection of colorectal cancer in primary care. Although not validated for use in hospitalized patients, it is often used by hospital physicians for reasons other than asymptomatic screening.

OBJECTIVE

To profile the in-hospital use of the FOBT and assess its impact on patient care.

METHODS

Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for all FOBTs conducted over a three-month period in 2011 by the central laboratory supporting the three acute care campuses of Hamilton Health Sciences (Hamilton, Ontario).

RESULTS

A total of 229 patients underwent 351 tests; 52% were female and the mean age was 49 years (range one to 104 years). A total of 80 (34.9%) patients had at least one positive test. The most common indications for testing were anemia (51.0%) and overt gastrointestinal bleeding (19.2%). Only one patient had testing performed for asymptomatic colorectal cancer screening. In only 20 (8.7%) cases medications were modified before testing and diet was modified in only 21 (9.2%) cases. Most patients (85.2%) were taking one or more medications that could result in a false-positive result. Only 18 (7.9%) patients had a digital rectal examinations documented, of which seven were positive. All patients with a positive digital rectal examination underwent endoscopic procedures that revealed a source of bleeding. Among 44 patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding, 12 (27.3%) had endoscopic investigations delayed to await results of the FOBT. Four patients were referred despite a negative FOBT due to a high degree of suspicion of gastrointestinal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The FOBT is often used inappropriately in the hospital setting. Confounding factors, such as diet and medication use, which may lead to false positives, are often ignored. Use of the FOBT in-hospital may lead to inappropriate management of patients, increased length of stay and increased direct medical costs. Use of the FOBT should be limited to validated indications only.

Antithrombotic drug does not affect the positive predictive value of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Antithrombotic drugs may affect the diagnostic performance of immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of antithrombotic drugs on the diagnostic performance of iFOBT.

METHODS

We analyzed 1016 patients who underwent colonoscopy for positive iFOBT. Patients were classified as follows: patients who had advanced neoplasms detected and those who did not; patients who had cancers detected and those who did not; patients who had any neoplasms detected and those who did not. We compared the following factors between two paired groups: sex, age, endoscopists' experience, and antithrombotic drug usage.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were taking antithrombotic drugs (13.7%). Advanced neoplasms, cancers, and any neoplasms were detected in 196 (19.3%), 59 (5.8%), and 490 (48.2%)patients, respectively. There were no higher detection rates in the antithrombotic drug (-) group than in the (+) group (advanced neoplasms: 19.3% vs 19.4%, P=1.000; cancers: 5.8% vs 5.8%, P=1.000; any neoplasms: 48.4% vs 47.5%, P=0.856). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that none of aspirin, warfarin, or other antithrombotic drugs was a significant factor for advanced neoplasms (95% CI 0.350-1.216, P=0.179; 95% CI 0.421-1.899, P=0.772; 95% CI 0.323-1.810, P=0.764, respectively). As to cancers and any neoplasms, no antithrombotic drug also proved to be a significant factor.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that the positive predictive value of iFOBT was not affected by ongoing antithrombotic therapy.

Does acetylsalicylic acid or warfarin affect the accuracy of fecal occult blood tests?

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines for screening of colorectal cancer do not offer specific recommendations for cessation of antithrombotic agents prior to fecal occult blood test (FOBT).

AIM

To asess the accuracy of FOBT in patients taking acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or warfarin.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted for studies that investigated the accuracy of FOBT in patients taking ASA and warfarin. The primary outcome was the pooled relative risk (RR) for true positive FOBT for detecting significant colonic neoplasia in patients taking ASA or warfarin compared with controls. The secondary outcome was a pooled RR for true positive in guaiac FOBT (g-FOBT) compared with immunochemical FOBT (i-FOBT).

RESULTS

Five observational studies included 759 patients taking ASA and 1652 control subjects. In patients taking ASA, pooled RR for true positive FOBT was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.93, P=0.0009), pooled RR for true positive g-FOBT was 0.69 (95% CI 0.60-0.79, P<0.0001), whereas pooled RR for true positive i-FOBT was 1.013 (95% CI 0.81-1.30, P=0.8182). Five observational studies included 806 patients taking warfarin and 10 338 control subjects. In patients taking warfarin, pooled RR for true positive FOBT was 1.559 (95% CI 1.349-1.801, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate that in patients taking ASA, there is a decrease in the positive predictive value (PPV) of g-FOBT but no significant difference in the PPV of i-FOBT compared with control subjects for detecting significant neoplasia. In patients taking warfarin, the PPV of FOBT was increased for detection of colorectal cancer compared with control subjects.

Perceived colonoscopy barriers and facilitators among urban African American patients and their medical residents

African Americans suffer from higher colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality than do Whites, yet have the lowest screening rates. To understand barriers and facilitators to colorectal cancer screening, this study used perceptual mapping (multidimensional scaling) methods to compare patients' perceptions of colonoscopy and general preventive health practices to those of their doctors in a general internal medicine clinic in a large urban hospital. African American patients (n = 102) were surveyed about their own screening beliefs; third-year resident physicians (n = 29) were asked what they perceived their patients believed. The perceptual maps showed significant differences between the patients' and physicians' perceptions of barriers, facilitators, and beliefs about screening. Physicians believed logistical lifestyle issues were the greatest screening barriers for their patients whereas fears of complications, pain, and cancer were the most important barriers perceived by patients. Physicians also underestimated patients' understanding of the benefits and importance of screening, doctors' recommendations, and beliefs that faith in God could facilitate screening. Physicians and patients perceived a doctor's recommendation for screening was an important facilitator. Better understanding of patient perceptions can be used to improve doctor-patient communication and to improve medical resident training by incorporating specific messages tailored for use with African American patients.

Inappropriate use of the faecal occult blood test outside of the National Health Service colorectal cancer screening programme

OBJECTIVE

The faecal occult blood test (FOBT) is the screening test validated for use in the National Health Service (NHS) Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) after trials demonstrated a 16% reduction in colorectal cancer-specific mortality. FOBT is not validated for use outside the BCSP. The aim was to investigate the number of FOBTs performed outside of the NHS BCSP at a single centre.

METHODS

All FOBTs performed over 1 year were identified. Basic patient demographics, requesting physician and FOBT results were obtained. Referrals and outcomes of the investigation following the FOBT were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 758 FOBTs were requested in 701 patients (352 female; median age 69; range 16-99). The majority (91%) were requested by general practitioners. A total of 515 out of 758 tests (68%) were performed in patients outside the NHS BCSP age range. Thirty-seven out of 86 positive FOBTs were investigated, diagnosing four rectal cancers and two polyps. Forty-nine out of 87 patients with a positive FOBT were not investigated further by the requesting physician or the test repeated. Of the remaining 672 FOBTs, 615 were negative and 57 were either incomplete or unsuitable for analysis. A total of 111 patients (18%) were referred to hospital and 105 of these had FOBT performed as part of the referral process.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates significant misuse of the FOBT outside the NHS BCSP. Inappropriate use leads to false positives and exposes patients to unnecessary risk. False negatives provide reassurance to patients who may have symptoms that should be investigated. The FOBT should not be available to physicians in either primary or secondary care and be restricted to NHS BCSP.

Endoscopic surveillance after curative surgery for sporadic colorectal cancer: patient-tailored, tumor-targeted or biology-driven?

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopy has been endorsed and introduced in most surveillance programs following curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC), yet little data are available to support its use in terms of patient selection, efficacy and frequency of surveillance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A literature search in the English language using the PubMed/Medline database for the MeSH terms "colorectal cancer", "surveillance", and "endoscopy", with focus on sporadic CRC, excluding CRC developed on a hereditary or inflammatory bowel disease background. Focus on results from the past 5 years was applied.

RESULTS

Recent systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized trials and prospective studies made the backbone of the article, supported by population-based findings and recent reports on tumor biology. Hard evidence to support a survival benefit from endoscopy alone is lacking. Definitions of "synchronous", "interval", and "metachronous" cancers are not uniform and hampers comparison of studies. The number of metachronous cancers (usually 2-4%) that develop after curative CRC surgery is small, and better patient-tailored surveillance could improve the diagnostic yield. Compliance with endoscopy is low compared to other modalities. Age and socio-demographic factors influence on the surveillance coverage and need to be addressed in any given program. The majority of local recurrences occur within the first 3 years after surgery independent of stage, and microsatellite instable (MSI) tumors appear to be at higher risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopy in surveillance after curative surgery for CRC is a resource demanding procedure. A tailored approach according to factors associated with an increased risk for metachronous cancer/local recurrence would increase efficiency.

Continue or discontinue warfarin for fecal occult blood testing in 2010? Does the published evidence provide an answer?

Whether to continue or discontinue warfarin before fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) requires comparison of the risks and benefits of both choices. Clinical practice varies on this issue, and guidelines are silent. A small body of evidence about the effect of warfarin on test characteristics of FOBT is inconclusive, although it suggests no effect. Retrospective studies on this topic may be prone to transfer bias, which affects the composition of the groups assembled for study. Considering the risks and benefits of discontinuing warfarin qualitatively, along with the published literature and clinical context in 2010, where tolerance for false-positive results is higher than it used to be and where immunochemical FOBT is a better screening test than older, guaiac-based FOBT, "no" seems like the "commonsense" answer.

Prevalence of significant neoplasia in FOBT-positive patients on warfarin compared with those not on warfarin

OBJECTIVES

The fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is widely used for colorectal cancer screening. However, the impact of warfarin use on FOBT sensitivity and specificity remains unclear. This study compares the relative risk of neoplasia in FOBT-positive patients stratified by warfarin use.

METHODS

The Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative database was used to identify patients with positive FOBT as the only indication for colonoscopy during 2005-2006. Patients were categorized on the basis of documented warfarin status within a 30-day period before FOBT. We compared the demographics and prevalence of significant colon findings (defined as polyp >9 mm or suspected malignant tumor) among the two groups. After adjusting for confounding variables, logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio of significant findings in warfarin-positive vs. warfarin-negative patients.

RESULTS

Of 10,266 patients with positive FOBT, 372 used warfarin, 9,265 did not use warfarin, and 629 were excluded because of missing warfarin status. Warfarin-positive patients were more likely male (65 vs. 50%; P<0.0001), Caucasian (88 vs. 80%; P<0.0001), and veterans (53 vs. 33%; P<0.0001). The prevalence of a significant finding was greater in the warfarin group, 16 vs. 11.4% (P<0.01). After adjusting for age and sex, the relative risk of significant colon findings among warfarin-positive patients was not significantly different from warfarin-negative patients (odds ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.44).

CONCLUSIONS

No increased risk for significant colonic findings among FOBT-positive patients according to warfarin use was identified. These findings suggest that continuing warfarin before FOBT will not affect the positive predictive value of this screening test.

Why are Korean American physicians reluctant to recommend colorectal cancer screening to Korean American patients? Exploratory interview findings

BACKGROUND

Korean Americans have one of the lowest screening rates for colorectal cancer. Although physician recommendation is one of the most important predictors of cancer screening across populations, only few Korean American patients receive such a recommendation.

METHODS

We interviewed 14 Korean American physicians in Los Angeles area who primarily serve Korean Americans to explore why they are reluctant to recommend colorectal cancer screening to their Korean patients.

RESULTS

Physicians identified barriers attributable to themselves (i.e., lack of knowledge, fear of medicolegal liability), their patients (i.e., patient's unfamiliarity with the concept of screening), and the health care system (i.e., lack of referral network, poor reimbursement).

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest the need for multi-faceted interventions directed at the physicians, their patients, and the health care system. Further research is needed to validate our results and to assess the extent to which they apply to physicians from other racial/ethnic groups.

Awareness of and adherence to cancer screening guidelines among health professionals in Japan

Since 1998 in Japan, guidelines for cancer screening programs have been developed and revised by a research group funded by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. However, little is known about health professionals' awareness of and adherence to the cancer screening guidelines. Surveys were conducted by mailing questionnaires to two target groups of health professionals: local government officers of municipal cancer screening programs of 3327 municipalities in 47 prefectures (local government officers group; n = 3327) and councilors of an academic society dealing with a mass survey of gastroenterological cancer (expert group; n = 195). The questionnaire contained questions dealing with: (1) awareness of and adherence to the cancer screening guidelines published in 2001, and (2) basic knowledge of and attitude towards cancer screening. We compared the responses of the two groups. The response rate in both groups was approximately 65%. Over 70% of the respondents were aware of the cancer screening guidelines. However, 20% of the local government officers and 35% of the experts thought that non-recommended methods could be used for population-based screening. Fifty-six percent of the local government officers and 76% of the experts responded that there was no problem with using non-recommended methods for opportunistic screening. Almost all health professionals believed that screening was 'almost always a good idea'. Although the two groups' backgrounds differed, both did not sufficiently understand the evidence-based approach for cancer screening. To properly conduct evidence-based cancer screening, it is necessary that health professionals have an appropriate understanding of the guidelines.

Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening examination for colorectal cancer in an outpatient clinic

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is a feasible examination technique and a suitable tool for population-based screening, but very little is known about determinants of endoscopic screening participation. The aim of this study was to determine the acceptance rate and the factors influencing the decision of participating in a screening program for patients in an outpatient clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, a colorectal cancer screening by FS was offered to 631 patients older than 40 years. Three strategies were available, (1) to have the endoscopy on the same day, (2) to make an appointment for another day, or (3) to take time to think about if they wanted the procedure. The reasons for refusal of the FS were documented.

RESULTS

419 of the 631 (66.4%) patients had no interest to take part in the screening program during their outpatient visit. Two hundred twelve (33.6%) patients were primarily interested on FS, but only 110 of them were finally examined. In total, 102 patients did not make an appointment for FS or did not appear for the endoscopy. The participation rate was therefore 17.4% (110/631) of all patients. Of the patients who agreed to receive an on-site examination, 78.3% were examined compared to 18.8% of patients who fixed the appointment for another day or after taking time to reflect upon the FS procedure. More male than female patients accepted the FS screening. Recommended colonoscopy was finally performed in 76%. Thirty-three polyps were found during the screening program of which 18 were larger than 0.5 cm. No CRC was detected. All patients agreed to repeat the FS every 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that a screening examination will be most likely performed if it is done as an on-site examination. In contrast, the participation rate is low if the patient has to make an appointment by himself. Acceptance of FS screening is also dependent on the patient's gender and family history of cancer. Additional strategies are needed to further improve participation.

Colorectal cancer screening education, prioritization, and self-perceived preparedness among primary care residents: data from a national survey

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains underutilized in the United States. We conducted a national survey of CRC screening education, prioritization, and self-perceived preparedness among resident physicians in Family Practice (FP), Internal Medicine (IM), and Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) training programs.

METHODS

Directors/administrators from 1085 FP, IM, and OB/GYN training programs were contacted by e-mail with a request to forward an invitation to participate in our Web-based CRC screening education survey to all residents in their program. Willing residents submitted responses in anonymous fashion. Data were analyzed using chi2 tests and analysis of variance methods.

RESULTS

In total, 243 program directors/administrators forwarded our invitation, and 835 residents responded (384 FP, 266 IM, 177 OB/GYN, 8 undesignated specialty). Nearly all resident responders (89%) had received CRC screening education, but few content delivery methods were reported. Most felt at least somewhat comfortable or somewhat knowledgeable with respect to advising patients about CRC screening (90%), currently endorsed CRC screening guidelines (89%), and criteria used to identify familial CRC syndromes (50%). However, substantially fewer respondents reported feeling very comfortable or very knowledgeable in these areas (45%, 23%, and 5%, respectively). Program specialty, level of training, and gender were the strongest indicators of self-perceived preparedness.

CONCLUSIONS

Although based on a relatively small sample of all FP, IM, and OB/GYN residents, these data suggest tangible opportunities to improve the CRC screening curriculum in primary care residency programs.

Colorectal cancer screening perceptions and practices: results from a national survey of gastroenterology, surgery and radiology trainees

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the United States is suboptimal. We conducted a national survey to learn about CRC screening perceptions and practices among trainees who perform CRC screening tests including those enrolled in Gastroenterology and Hepatology (GIH), General and Colorectal Surgery, and Diagnostic and Abdominal Radiology training programs.

METHODS

Program directors/administrators (PDs/PAs) from 642 programs were contacted by e-mail with an invitation to forward our survey to trainees in their programs. Participating trainees then completed an anonymous, Web-based questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 130/642 (20%) PDs/PAs forwarded our survey to their trainees, with responses received from 476 trainees (80 GIH, 261 surgery, 135 radiology). Colonoscopy was felt to be the best CRC screening test at reducing CRC mortality, with patient-related factors perceived as greater barriers than system-related factors. No single guideline was deemed very influential on CRC screening practices by most trainees. A total of 2 of 5 above-average risk patient profiles were not recognized by most trainees. Colonoscopy was selected as the preferred follow-up test for a positive CRC screening test by most trainees. However, 34% of respondents chose an option other than colonoscopy alone for follow-up of a positive fecal occult blood test.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on data from this national survey of gastroenterology, surgery, and radiology trainees, opportunities exist for curricular changes that may help enhance current perceptions and practices of trainees who perform CRC screening tests.

Prospective evaluation of the use and outcome of admission stool guaiac testing: the Digital Rectal Examination on Admission to the Medical Service (DREAMS) Study

BACKGROUND

Although physicians often perform fecal occult blood testing at the time of hospital admission, the practice of admission stool guaiac (ASG) testing has not been evaluated prospectively. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and outcomes of digital rectal examination (DRE) and ASG testing in patients admitted to the hospital.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 2143 patients admitted to the medical service at our hospital over a 1-year period. A detailed clinical history was obtained, and the proportion of patients who had DRE and ASG testing, the frequency of positive tests, and the results of follow-up testing were determined.

RESULTS

A DRE was performed in 1539 of the 2143 subjects (71.8%), and 1.8% had abnormal findings, 21.8% had a normal examination, and the result of ASG testing was the only documented finding in the remaining 76.4% of patients. ASG testing was performed in 1342 of the 2143 subjects (62.6%), and the ASG test was positive in 237 persons (17.7%). However, only 161 (67.9%) of those with a positive ASG test had further diagnostic testing and a colonic source of occult gastrointestinal blood loss was detected in 68 (42.2%) of these 161 persons.

CONCLUSIONS

Although DRE and ASG testing are commonly performed on admission to the hospital, documentation of the findings and follow-up of positive tests are poor. These findings highlight the need to improve physician training on the appropriate use and documentation of the DRE and fecal occult blood testing.

Survey of primary physicians' knowledge of colorectal cancer screening

OBJECTIVE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common of the gastrointestinal cancers in Israel. The low rate of patient compliance to a recent CRC screening program of Clalit Health Services, a major health management organization in Israel, prompted the present survey of primary care physicians' knowledge and practices regarding CRC screening.

METHODS

A 23-item questionnaire, formulated according to the policy of the Israel Ministry of Health and the recommendations of the American Gastroenterological Association, was distributed to 150 primary physicians of Clalit Health Services. The relative ratio of correct to incorrect answers was calculated for every question and by professional group.

RESULTS

The response rate was 89%. Total score (out of a maximum 23) was 20.68 for family physicians (experts in family medicine), 17.79 for experts in other fields, and 17.82 for general practitioners (average, 0.90, 0.77, and 0.77, respectively). The score for the family physicians was significantly higher than for the other two groups (P=0.0070). Clustering items by specific issues yielded significantly better scores for the family physicians in four areas: screening (P=0.0164), appropriate test for high-risk population in Israel (P=0.0012), definition of average-risk population (P=0.0012), and CRC symptoms (P=0.0108). A low level of knowledge on the definition of the high-risk population was noted in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Experts in family medicine in Israel have significantly greater knowledge of most issues of CRC than primary care experts in other fields and general practitioners, although all three groups lack knowledge on the definition of the high-risk population. Continuing physician education should focus on these areas.

A model of stage of change to recommend colonoscopy among urban primary care physicians

Theory is little used in the prediction of physician cancer screening stage of change. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the theoretical predictors of stage of change to recommend colonoscopy among 235 urban physicians. Constructs from the theory of planned behavior, social-cognitive theory, and the transtheoretical model were systematically tested. As predicted, contextual factors, such as the physicians' ages, their race-ethnicities, patient race-ethnicity, and office-related barriers to preventive care were associated with stage of change through self-efficacy, normative beliefs, and negative behavioral beliefs. The findings demonstrate the relevance of these models to studying the behavior of physicians and support the development of interventions that are tailored to normative beliefs and specific physician cognitions for colonoscopy recommendation.

Changing habits of practice. Transforming internal medicine residency education in ambulatory settings

PURPOSE

The majority of health care, both for acute and chronic conditions, is delivered in the ambulatory setting. Despite repeated proposals for change, the majority of internal medicine residency training still occurs in the inpatient setting. Substantial changes in ambulatory education are needed to correct the current imbalance. To assist educators and policy makers in this process, this paper reviews the literature on ambulatory education and makes recommendations for change.

METHODS

The authors searched the Medline, Psychlit, and ERIC databases from 2000 to 2004 for studies that focused specifically on curriculum, teaching, and evaluation of internal medicine residents in the ambulatory setting to update previous reviews. Studies had to contain primary data and were reviewed for methodological rigor and relevance.

RESULTS

Fifty-five studies met criteria for review. Thirty-five of the studies focused on specific curricular areas and 11 on ambulatory teaching methods. Five involved evaluating performance and 4 focused on structural issues. No study evaluated the overall effectiveness of ambulatory training or investigated the effects of current resident continuity clinic microsystems on education.

CONCLUSION

This updated review continues to identify key deficiencies in ambulatory training curriculum and faculty skills. The authors make several recommendations: (1) Make training in the ambulatory setting a priority. (2) Address systems problems in practice environments. (3) Create learning experiences appropriate to the resident's level of development. (4) Teach and evaluate in the examination room. (5) Expand subspecialty-based training to the ambulatory setting. (6) Make faculty development a priority. (7) Create and fund multiinstitutional educational research consortia.

Positive predictive value of fecal occult blood testing in persons taking warfarin

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, some physicians discontinue warfarin prior to fecal occult blood testing (FOBT). Although anticoagulant use is associated with an increased risk of overt gastrointestinal bleeding, the impact of warfarin on the positive predictive value of FOBT is unknown.

METHODS

During a 5-yr period, we prospectively studied all patients taking warfarin who were referred for the evaluation of a positive FOBT. For each patient taking warfarin, we enrolled one age- and gender-matched control subject with a positive FOBT who was not taking anticoagulants. A detailed clinical history was obtained, and all subjects underwent colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

RESULTS

Lesions consistent with occult bleeding were identified in 59.0% of the 210 patients in the warfarin group and 53.8% of the 210 control subjects (p= 0.27). Although more lesions were identified by colonoscopy in the warfarin group than in control subjects (36.2%vs 25.7%, p= 0.02), there was no difference in the frequency of lesions identified by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (35.2%vs 39.5%, p= 0.43). Overall, adenomas > or =1 cm in diameter (16.2%) and colorectal carcinoma (9.5%) were the most common lesions identified by colonoscopy, while erosive gastritis (15.5%) and erosive duodenitis (11.0%) were the most frequent lesions found by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Among individuals with colorectal cancer, 83.3% of patients in the warfarin group had early cancers (Dukes' stage A or B) compared with 50.0% of control subjects (p= 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin use did not decrease the positive predictive value of FOBT. These findings suggest that warfarin should not be discontinued prior to FOBT.

Survey of surgeons' and internists' knowledge of colorectal cancer screening

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common of the gastrointestinal cancers in Israel, with an incidence of 50 cases per 100,000 for men and 45 per 100,000 for women in 2000.

AIM

The low rate of patient compliance noted in CRC screening program conducted in our center, prompted the present survey of the knowledge and practices regarding CRC screening recommendations.

METHODS

A 23-item questionnaire formulated according to the Israeli Ministry of Health policy and recommendation of the American Gastroenterological Association was distributed among the physicians of the six departments of internal medicine, and the department of surgery of the Rabin Medical Center. The relative ratio of correct answers was calculated for every question and by subgroups: internists and surgeons, experts and residents in internal medicine and in surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty-five of 80 physicians (69%) completed the questionnaire. The total score for all participants was 15.82 (average 0.68), significantly lower than the optimal correct score of 23 (average 1.00). The internists had a similar total score to the surgeons, 15.61 and 15.28. When the questions were clustered according to specific issues and only the correct answers for each cluster scored, the success rate decreased with a range of 19-69%. Only 22% of responders did not advise fecal occult blood test (FOBT) for the high-risk population; 57% thought the screening age range was 40-65 years, and only 37% knew that the high-risk criteria include a family history of ovarian cancer.

CONCLUSION

Both internists and surgeons' knowledge about screening recommendations of CRC can be improved. Health authorities should invest greater efforts in continuing physician education. We believe that this strategy will increase the participation rate in CRC preventive programs.

A population-based audit for diagnosing colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of the diagnostic work-up of colorectal cancer is a prerequisite to improve its quality. Family history is one of few known risk factors of the disease and it is therefore important to investigate to what extent this factor is used in routine management.

METHODS

Copies of records from all health-care suppliers visited during diagnostic work-up were requested for 227/235 (97%) patients with recently diagnosed colorectal cancer in the county of Västmanland during 1998-99. A first consultation was identified and records and all diagnostic measures related to the initial consultation were scrutinized. A family history of colorectal cancer was known for 179 patients.

RESULTS

Most of the patients, 107 (66%) colon and 57 (86%) rectal cancer patients, had consulted with a general practitioner. The median diagnostic work-up time was 42 days (IQ 12-110) for colon and 23 days (IQ 0-49) for rectal cancer. A double-contrast barium enema was the most commonly used diagnostic method for colon cancer. Family history was documented at the first consultation in 2/179 (1%) cases. In patients with right-sided cancer, median diagnostic work-up time was 53 days in patients with a positive result of faecal occult blood test (FOBT) as compared with 448 in patients with a negative result (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Primary care is the key actor in diagnosing rectal cancer. The restricted capacity for X-ray is one of the main obstacles in detection of colon cancer. Family history is rarely documented during diagnostic work-up of colorectal cancer. The benefit of using FOBT in symptomatic patients is questioned.

Colorectal cancer screening and familial risk: a survey of internal medicine residents' knowledge and practice patterns

OBJECTIVE

Risk stratification is essential to the appropriate use of colorectal cancer screening recommendations. The principal objective of this study was to assess the knowledge and screening behavior of internal medicine (IM) residents regarding familial colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a survey of IM residents in their second and third year of postgraduate training from two university-based programs (n = 127). The survey instrument assessed physician knowledge of screening recommendations and current practices for individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer, adenomatous polyps, familial adenomatous polyposis, and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. The instrument also elicited data regarding familial risk assessment, documentation, and notification of at-risk family members.

RESULTS

Eighty-one IM eligible residents (81%) completed the survey. Most respondents identified a family history of colorectal cancer as an important factor in assessing colorectal cancer risk and appropriately implemented relevant screening recommendations. However, for patients with a family history of adenomatous polyps diagnosed before age 60 yr, knowledge and adherence to recommendations advocating screening at age 40 was relatively poor. More importantly, for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, respondents lacked the necessary risk assessment skills and knowledge to appropriately implement current recommendations. There were no consistent differences in knowledge or screening behavior when stratified on the basis of program site or postgraduate year status.

CONCLUSION

Many IM residents are deficient in their knowledge, risk assessment skills, and screening practices for patients at familial risk of colorectal cancer. Effective educational strategies that promote awareness regarding familial risk, risk assessment skills, and appropriate use of relevant screening guidelines are needed.

Knowledge of hepatitis C screening and management by internal medicine residents: trends over 2 years

OBJECTIVES

Over 2 million people in the United States are infected with hepatitis C, and there has been an explosion in knowledge regarding this disease in the last decade. Internal medicine residents must be able to identify patients at risk for hepatitis C and institute appropriate diagnostic testing and referral of these patients.

METHODS

A survey regarding hepatitis C risk factors and the management of hepatitis C patients was administered on three occasions over 15 months (time 0, 1 month, and 15 months) to members of a large university-based internal medicine residency.

RESULTS

During the study period 59 residents completed all three surveys. Less than half of the residents (39%) ask patients about hepatitis C risk factors. Only 58% reported that they would refer a hepatitis C antibody positive patient with elevated liver enzymes to a subspecialist on the initial survey. The residents who did not refer patients cited low response rates, high side-effect profiles, and the high cost of therapy as reasons for not referring the patient. There was significant improvement (58% vs 78%, p < 0.01) in the rate of patient referral during the 15-month study period but no substantial improvement in the other knowledge deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge base of the internal medicine residents about hepatitis C screening and management is suboptimal. New, more effective hepatitis C education programs for internal medicine residents should be initiated.

Colorectal cancer screening compliance by medicine residents: perceived and actual

OBJECTIVE

Implementation of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with widely available techniques can result in a significant reduction in CRC-related mortality. Clinical practice paradigms are often ingrained in physicians during residency. We, therefore, investigated both compliance and perceived obstacles to CRC screening in the practices of physicians-in-training.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients who were receiving their primary care in the internal medicine resident clinics at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and were at average risk for CRC. In addition to demographics, data on the use of screening mammography, Pap smear, cholesterol, fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), and flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) were collected. A questionnaire was also distributed to all internal medicine residents to assess their CRC screening knowledge and perceived screening compliance.

RESULTS

One hundred eight patient charts were reviewed. The percentage of patients appropriately screened for each test was as follows: mammography 66%, Pap smear 65%, cholesterol 53%, FOBT 13%, and FS 16%. Residents dramatically overestimated their perceived FS and FOBT screening rates, 78% and 88%, respectively. Most residents identified barriers to FS screening. Although rudimentary CRC screening knowledge appeared adequate, a number of knowledge-based deficiencies were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Internal medicine residents at our institution demonstrate poor CRC screening compliance especially when compared with other health care maintenance interventions. This cannot be entirely accounted for by inadequate knowledge; discrepancy between the perceived and actual implementation of CRC screening may be important. Efforts to improve screening compliance should include a focus on physicians-in-training.

An audit of the utility of in-patient fecal occult blood testing

OBJECTIVES

Recent surveys of physician practice have suggested the existence of excessive, inappropriate use of the fecal occult blood test (FOBT). We studied the implementation of this test in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of 1000 randomly selected patients who had been discharged from the Medicine service at four teaching hospitals. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, presence or absence of overt GI bleeding, and use of medications that might affect the FOBT were recorded. Reviewers assessed whether patients who had FOBT would have been candidates for colon resection if asymptomatic colon cancer had been found.

RESULTS

Digital rectal examination was documented in 44.8% of patients; the findings were recorded in only 9%. A total of 421 patients had FOBT on admission, usually on stool obtained at digital rectal examination. Of the patients with a positive FOBT, 17% had active GI bleeding. Only 41.1% of patients with a positive FOBT were referred to the gastroenterology service. In 70.5% of patients, FOBT could be considered inappropriate because of factors such as age, active GI bleeding, or use of aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The FOBT, which is validated only for colorectal cancer screening, is often performed inappropriately in patients admitted to the hospital. This test should be restricted in hospital practice. It would be preferable to identify patients who are appropriate candidates for colorectal cancer screening at the time of hospital discharge and to advise them about the appropriate performance of the FOBT at home.

Survey of the opinions, knowledge, and practices of gastroenterologists regarding colorectal cancer screening and use of the fecal occult blood test

OBJECTIVES

Primary care physicians and internal medicine residents have poor understanding of colorectal cancer screening and the use of fecal occult blood tests. If acceptance and implementation of colorectal cancer screening is to improve, gastroenterologists may have to take a more leading role in the education of their primary care colleagues, physicians in training, and the general public. However, before this can be recommended, it is necessary to determine how closely gastroenterologists follow currently recommended guidelines and how they use fecal occult blood tests.

METHODS

We mailed a two-page, structured questionnaire about colorectal cancer screening and use of fecal occult blood tests to 8000 randomly selected gastroenterologists in the United States.

RESULTS

We received responses from 24% of the gastroenterologists. Almost all used fecal occult blood tests in the office setting, 86% on stool obtained at rectal examination. The test was frequently used for reasons other than colorectal cancer screening, and often without adequate patient instruction on dietary and medication restrictions. Of the respondents, 98% commenced screening at age < or = 50 yr, whereas 37% either continued screening into advanced age or never stopped. Annual fecal occult blood testing with flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 yr was the screening strategy recommended by 71% of the respondents, whereas 25% recommended colonoscopy every 10 yr. However, 77% of the gastroenterologists chose colonoscopy for personal colorectal cancer screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastroenterologists usually give appropriate advice on colorectal cancer screening but often misuse fecal occult blood tests. This may produce excessively high false-positive screening rates, leading to unnecessary diagnostic testing without apparent benefit.