Clostridium difficile infection: Evolution, phylogeny and molecular epidemiology

Over the recent decades, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has emerged as a global public health threat. Despite growing attention, C. difficile remains a poorly understood pathogen, however, the exquisite sensitivity offered by next generation sequencing (NGS) technology has enabled analysis of the genome of C. difficile, giving us access to massive genomic data on factors such as virulence, evolution, and genetic relatedness within C. difficile groups. NGS has also demonstrated excellence in investigations of outbreaks and disease transmission, in both small and large-scale applications. This review summarizes the molecular epidemiology, evolution, and phylogeny of C. difficile, one of the most important pathogens worldwide in the current antibiotic resistance era.

Comparison of molecular typing methods applied to Clostridium difficile

Since the 1980s the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been investigated by the application of many different typing or fingerprinting methods. To study the epidemiology of CDI, a typing method with a high discriminatory power, typeability, and reproducibility is required. Molecular typing methods are generally regarded as having advantages over phenotypic methods in terms of the stability of genomic markers and providing greater levels of typeability. A growing number of molecular methods have been applied to C. difficile. For the early and rapid detection of outbreak situations, methods such as restriction enzyme analysis, arbitrary primed polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and PCR ribotyping are commonly used. For long-term epidemiology, multilocus sequence typing, multilocus variable number of tandem repeats analysis, and amplified fragment length polymorphism are of interest. Currently, the PCR-ribotyping method and the library of PCR ribotypes in Cardiff are the benchmarks to which most typing studies around the world are compared. Multilocus variable number of tandem repeats analysis is the most discriminative typing method and will contribute significantly to our understanding of the epidemiology of this important nosocomial pathogen.

Typing of Clostridium perfringens strains by use of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) system in comparison with zymotyping

The definition of strain clonality postulates that strains showed identical phenotypic and genetic traits are likely to descend from a common ancestor even if they were isolated from different sources and locations. Regarding this definition, non-epidemiologically linked strains might be clonal strains. To overcome this ambiguity, the discriminatory capability of RAPD typing was assessed firstly on eight Clostridium perfringens strains proven to be chromosomally different with one being the mutant of another one. Thirteen primers were tested but only two were able to differentiate seven of the eight strains. With none of the used primers it was possible to differentiate the parental strain and its mutant harboring an insertion of 180 kb. The four most discriminant primers were retained to determine the RAPD fingerprints of a further 20 previously zymotyped strains from which seventeen were unrelated. To compare the two typing systems, the zymotype of the eight chromosomally different strains was determined. Thus, the discriminatory index was calculated on the basis of 25 unrelated C. perfringens strains. This was 0.97 with RAPD typing and 0.99 with zymotyping. From these results we conclude that the RAPD typing which is less fastidious than zymotyping can be used as an epidemiological marker for C. perfringens.

Genomic fingerprinting of antituberculosis agents-resistantLactobacillus ruminus SPM0211 using the Microbial Uniprimer™ kit

A Lactobacillus isolate was collected from the feces of a healthy Korean individual and named as Lactobacillus ruminus SPM0211. It was further characterized by subjecting it to an antibiotic resistance test and genetic analysis. In the antibiotic resistance test, all tested Lactobacillus spp. were classified as "high resistance" for multiple antibiotics, such as isoniazid, ethambutol, cycloserine, and vancomycin. L. ruminus SPM0211 was classified as "high resistance" for streptomycin also, while the other tested Lactobacillus spp. were classified as low resistance. This suggests that the antimicrobial spectra may be a good indicator in the discrimination of this strain among the tested Lactobacillus spp. In a polymerase chain reaction-random amplified polymorphic DNA (PCR-RAPD) analysis using the Microbial Uniprimer kit, L. ruminus SPM0211, and L. suebicus were clustered as a group with a 74.3% similarity level, suggesting that these two species are genetically related. Thus, our data suggest that the PCR-RADP method using the Microbial Uniprimer kit may be valuable in discriminating L. ruminus SPM0211 from other Lactobacillus spp.

Antimicrobial resistance patterns of vancomycin-resistant Streptococcus equinus isolated from animal foods and epidemiological typing of resistant S. equinus by microbial uniprimer kit

Raw milk samples, and cow and chicken intestines were tested to isolate vancomycin-resistant, gram-positive bacteria. From these samples, we isolated seven vancomycin-resistant Streptococcus equinus, two vancomycin-resistant viridans Streptococcus and two vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. The MICs of several antibiotics, including vancomycin, against these strains were tested. Seven isolates of S. equinus showed high level resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin (>100 microg/mL). The cell wall thickness of these strains was compared with that of the sensitive strain by TEM and no differences were obserbed between these strains. We compared the strains of vancomycin-resistant Streptococcus equinus using PCR with Microbial Uniprimer Kit. We concluded that it is necessary to combine other methods in order to cluster and identify all isolates of S. equinus.

Molecular typing methods for the epidemiological identification of Clostridium difficile strains

Toxigenic Clostridium difficile is the etiologic agent of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD), the most common cause of nosocomial diarrhea. Cross-infection between patients and transmission through the environment and medical personnel are important factors in the acquisition of CDAD. In order to understand differences in epidemiology and pathogenesis, a number of typing schemes have been developed. We will review the typing methods used to study the epidemiology of C. difficile infections and how they have evolved from a phenotypic identification to state of the art molecular methods, detecting genetic polymorphisms among strains. These molecular methods include PCR-based methods (arbitrarily primed-PCR [AP-PCR] and PCR ribotyping), restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) and pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The application, usefulness and feasibility of these methods are compared and discussed. Finally, the role of genomics as a tool to investigate CDAD is introduced.

Identification of microorganisms using random primed PCR

The polymerase chain reaction has facilitated the use of molecular approaches in microbiology including new strategies for the rapid identification of micro-organisms. Approaches based on the use of random primers and standard conditions, allows characteristic DNA fingerprints to be generated from any micro-organism even in the absence of information about its DNA sequence. Different primers can be used to produce genus-specific, species-specific, or even strain-specific DNA fingerprints. This article covers the background to this strategy, describes three different approaches to generating DNA fingerprints using random primers, and provides experimental detail for one method, RAPD.

Comparison of PCR-based approaches to molecular epidemiologic analysis of Clostridium difficile

Representative isolates of the 10 serogroups of Clostridium difficile and 39 clinical isolates (30 toxigenic and 9 nontoxigenic), including 5 isolates from a confirmed nosocomial outbreak, were analyzed by using two previously described arbitrary-primer PCR (AP-PCR) molecular typing methodologies (AP-PG05 and AP-ARB11) and PCR ribotyping. The two AP-PCR methods investigated gave comparable results; AP-PG05 and AP-ARB11 identified 8 and 7 groups among the serogroup isolates and classified the clinical isolates into 21 and 20 distinct groups, respectively. PCR ribotyping also identified 8 unique groups among the serogroup isolates but classified the clinical isolates into 23 groups. In addition, when results obtained by the PCR methods were compared with typing data generated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), PCR ribotyping and PFGE were found to be in agreement for 83% (29 of 35) of isolates typeable by both techniques while AP-PG05 was in agreement with PFGE for 60% (20 of 33) and AP-ARB11 was in agreement with PFGE for only 44% (17 of 36). These results indicate that PCR ribotyping is a more discriminatory approach than AP-PCR for typing C. difficile and, furthermore, that this technique generates results that are in higher concordance with those obtained by using an established method for differentiating isolates of this organism on a molecular level than are results generated by using AP-PCR.

Characterization of Serpulina hyodysenteriae isolates of serotypes 8 and 9 by random amplification of polymorphic DNA analysis

A PCR-based DNA fingerprinting method termed RAPD (Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA), or AP-PCR (for Arbitrary Primed PCR) was used to detect sequence diversity among reference strains and isolates of Serpulina hyodysenteriae. RAPD fingerprinting of 20 S. hyodysenteriae isolates of serotypes 8 or 9 from Quebec was generated with 2 different 10-base primers used independently. Reference strains and field isolates belonging to serotypes 8 or 9 revealed polymorphisms in RAPD fingerprints with both primers. Interspecies polymorphisms were observed by RAPD analysis of S. hyodysenteriae representing serotypes 1 to 9, S.innocens, and 5 other weakly beta-hemolytic intestinal spirochetes. A dendrogram based on the analysis of RAPD profiles of the strains tested with one of the primers (#17), permitted the clustering of these strains into 11 divisions. The predominance of particular RAPD profiles among S. hyodysenteriae isolates isolated from cases of swine dysentery in different herds suggested that certain S. hyodysenteriae types could be epidemiologically important. Our results indicate that RAPD could be used as a typing method for S. hyodysenteriae and as an epidemiological method for identifying spirochetes isolated from swine.

The polymerase chain reaction: applications for the detection of foodborne pathogens

Faster methods for the detection of foodborne microbial pathogens are needed. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can amplify specific segments of DNA and is used to detect and identify bacterial genes responsible for causing diseases in humans. The major features and requirements for the PCR are described along with a number of important variations. A considerable number of PCR-based assays have been developed, but they have been applied most often to clinical and environmental samples and more rarely for the detection of foodborne microorganisms. Much of the difficulty in implementing PCR for the analysis of food samples lies in the problems encountered during the preparation of template DNAs from food matrices; a variety of approaches and considerations are examined. PCR methods developed for the detection and identification of particular bacteria, viruses, and parasites found in foods are described and discussed, and the major features of these reactions are summarized.

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis

OBJECTIVES

To review and summarize the status of diagnosis, epidemiology, infection control, and treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD).

DIAGNOSIS

A case definition of CDAD should include the presence of symptoms (usually diarrhea) and at least one of the following positive tests: endoscopy revealing pseudomembranes, stool cytotoxicity test for toxin B, stool enzyme immunoassay for toxin A or B, or stool culture for C difficile (preferably with confirmation of organism toxicity if a direct stool toxin test is negative or not done). Testing of asymptomatic patients, including those who are asymptomatic after treatment, is not recommended other than for epidemiologic purposes. Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy is the only diagnostic test for pseudomembranous colitis, but it is expensive, invasive, and insensitive (51% to 55%) for the diagnosis of CDAD. Stool culture is the most sensitive laboratory test currently in clinical use, but it is not as specific as the cell cytotoxicity assay.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

C difficile is the most frequently identified cause of nosocomial diarrhea. The majority of C difficile infections are acquired nosocomially, and most patients remain asymptomatic following acquisition. Antimicrobial exposure is the greatest risk factor for patients, especially clindamycin, cephalosporins, and penicillins, although virtually every antimicrobial has been implicated. Cases of CDAD unassociated with prior antimicrobial or antineoplastic use are very rare. Hands of personnel, as well as a variety of environmental sites within institutions, have been found to be contaminated with C difficile, which can persist as spores for many months. Contaminated commodes, bathing tubs, and electronic thermometers have been implicated as sources of C difficile. Symptomatic and asymptomatic infected patients are the major reservoirs and sources for environmental contamination. Both genotypic and phenotypic typing systems for C difficile are available and have enhanced epidemiologic investigation greatly.

INFECTION CONTROL

Successful infection control measures designed to prevent horizontal transmission include the use of gloves in handling body substances and replacement of electronic thermometers with disposable devices. Isolation, cohorting, handwashing, environmental disinfection, and treatment of asymptomatic carriers are recommended practices for which convincing data of efficacy are not available. The most successful control measure directed at reduction in symptomatic disease has been antimicrobial restriction.

TREATMENT

Treatment of symptomatic (but not asymptomatic) patients with metronidazole or vancomycin for 10 days is effective; metronidazole may be preferred to reduce risk of vancomycin resistance among other organisms in hospitals. Recurrence of symptoms occurs in 7% to 20% of patients and is due to both relapse and reinfection. Over 90% of first recurrences can be treated successfully in the same manner as initial cases. Combination treatment with vancomycin plus rifampin or the addition orally of the yeast Saccharomyces boulardii to vancomycin or metronidazole treatment has been shown to prevent subsequent diarrhea in patients with recurrent disease.

Comparison of arbitrarily primed PCR with restriction endonuclease and immunoblot analyses for typing Clostridium difficile isolates

Arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR) was used to genotype 26 clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile previously analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) and 20 isolates typed by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) with HindIII. Two levels of differentiation were achieved with the AP-PCR approach by use of two different arbitrary primers. With the 19-mer arbitrary primer T-7 (first level of differentiation), a good correlation was found between IB and AP-PCR typing. Twenty isolates grouped into six IB types were separated into seven major AP-PCR types. These seven AP-PCR groups were further discriminated into 12 subtypes after genotyping with the arbitrary primer PG-05 (second level of differentiation). The remaining six isolates, all of different IB types, showed a unique and distinct DNA banding pattern with both of the arbitrary primers, T-7 and PG-05. Twenty isolates representing 20 REA types from 15 REA groups were resolved into 13 AP-PCR DNA profiles with the arbitrary primer T-7. A good correlation was found at this level of differentiation between the major REA groups, Y and M, and AP-PCR typing. While AP-PCR with this primer failed to differentiate isolates in REA groups J, G, R, and B, AP-PCR with PG-05 resolved these four isolates into four distinct AP-PCR types. In addition, one of three M strains and one of four Y strains displayed a slightly different DNA banding pattern by AP-PCR (with PG-05) from that of the other strains in the group. We conclude that AP-PCR is a rapid and sensitive method which not only complements other typing schemes but also may be a substitute and prove to be especially suited for immediate epidemiological tracking of nosocomial infections due to C. difficile.

Typing of Clostridium difficile by polymerase chain reaction with an arbitrary primer

We assessed the use of the polymerase chain reactions (PCR) with an arbitrary primer (AP-PCR) to investigate a major hospital outbreak of diarrhoea due to Clostridium difficile. A single pattern consisting of three bands of 240, 580 and 1100 bp was obtained from all isolates studied. AP-PCR is a simple, rapid technique which should find increased application in the rapid investigation of suspected outbreaks of many different bacterial species, particularly new pathogens or those for which no accepted typing scheme exists.

Comparison of ribotyping, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and random amplified polymorphic DNA for typing Clostridium difficile strains

Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive sporulating anaerobic bacillus which causes pseudomembranous colitis. Nosocomial acquisition of this bacteria has proved frequent, and epidemiological markers are needed to recognize and control common-source outbreaks. We therefore compared the results of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) after restriction with SmaI or NruI, random-amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) using 3 10-mer oligonucleotides, and ribotyping to differentiate between 30 unrelated strains of C. difficile belonging to 8 serotypes. The strains were separated into 26 different types by PFGE, 25 by RAPD, but into only 18 types by ribotyping. Median percentages of similarity between strains ranged from 27 in the PFGE assay to 90 in the ribotyping assay, but there was good agreement between the 3 methods for the clustering of strains. PFGE was more time-consuming than RAPD but its patterns were easier to analyze.

RAPD typing for distinguishing species and strains in the genus Listeria

The randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) technique was employed in the development of a typing protocol for Listeria isolates, particularly Listeria monocytogenes strains. A single strain of L. monocytogenes was used and 200 random decamer primers were screened for their discriminatory abilities by visualizing the amplification products electrophoretically. Three candidate primers displaying potentially useful banding patterns were selected and tested against 52 L. monocytogenes strains, encompassing 11 serotypes, and 12 other strains representing five other Listeria spp. Thirty-four banding profiles were obtained with one particular primer. RAPD analysis allowed differentiation between Listeria spp. and was found to further subdivide strains of the same serotype. Where only one primer was used strains from different serotypes were occasionally found to produce identical banding profiles. RAPD analysis, which in our hands proved to be reproducible, shows much promise as a molecular alternative to traditional L. monocytogenes typing protocols.

Identification of outbreak-associated and other strains of Clostridium difficile by numerical analysis of SDS-PAGE protein patterns

Seventy-three cultures of Clostridium difficile isolated both during, and in the period immediately following, an outbreak of infection in a group of three hospitals, were characterized by one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) of whole-cell proteins. Each protein pattern was characterized by the presence of one or two dense bands which were highly reproducible. The protein patterns were used as the basis for a numerical analysis which divided the strains into five phenons (electrophoretic or EP types). The majority, 60 of the 73 cultures, belonged to a single phenon which included strains from both patients and the environment. We conclude that high-resolution SDS-PAGE of proteins provides an effective method for typing C. difficile and therefore for tracing the possible spread of epidemic strains in hospitals and other institutions, thereby allowing a better understanding of the epidemiology of the organism.

Use of arbitrary primer PCR to type Clostridium difficile and comparison of results with those by immunoblot typing

An arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR) assay was used to type Clostridium difficile isolates from a hospital outbreak of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Forty-one isolates were separated into nine groups, with 66% falling into one group; no other group contained more than 10%. Comparison of AP-PCR grouping with that when the immunoblot technique was used showed agreement for 33 of 34 isolates typed by both techniques, and AP-PCR grouped seven isolates that were not typeable by immunoblotting.

Genomic fingerprinting of Clostridium difficile isolates by using a random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assay

This study describes the use of a new and easy method called random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assay to distinguish strains of C. difficile. We used two single short primers (AP4 and AP5) with arbitrary nucleotide sequences in a polymerase chain reaction to amplify genomic DNA. The profiles observed after electrophoretic separation were able to distinguish 20 reference C. difficile strains previously serotyped by Delmée's method. The fingerprints of 11 epidemiologically unrelated C. difficile strains clearly yielded a DNA polymorphism between all the strains. Latterly, RAPD profiles of 11 C. difficile strains isolated from 2 independent suspected outbreaks showed, in each case, a predominant banding pattern corresponding to an epidemic strain. These results suggest that RAPD assay could be a valuable tool for epidemiological studies.