Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Aeromonas hydrophila serogroup O:19

Emerging bioanalytical sensors for rapid and close-to-real-time detection of priority abiotic and biotic stressors in aquaculture and culture-based fisheries

Abiotic stresses of various chemical contamination of physical, inorganic, organic and biotoxin origin and biotic stresses of bacterial, viral, parasitic and fungal origins are the significant constraints in achieving higher aquaculture production. Testing and rapid detection of these chemical and microbial contaminants are crucial in identifying and mitigating abiotic and biotic stresses, which has become one of the most challenging aspects in aquaculture and culture-based fisheries. The classical analytical techniques, including titrimetric methods, spectrophotometric, mass spectrometric, spectroscopic, and chromatographic techniques, are tedious and sometimes inaccessible when required. The development of novel and improved bioanalytical methods for rapid, selective and sensitive detection is a wide and dynamic field of research. Biosensors offer precise detection of biotic and abiotic stressors in aquaculture and culture-based fisheries within no time. This review article allows filling the knowledge gap for detection and monitoring of chemical and microbial contaminants of abiotic and biotic origin in aquaculture and culture-based fisheries using nano(bio-) analytical technologies, including nano(bio-)molecular and nano(bio-)sensing techniques.

Simple and direct detection of Aeromonas hydrophila infection in the goldfish, Carassius auratus (L.), by dot blotting using specific monoclonal antibodies

A combination of eight isolates of Aeromonas hydrophila was used to produce monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). Ten different groups of MAbs specific to Aeromonas were selected. The first five groups of MAbs demonstrated high specificity and bound to only one or two isolates of A. hydrophila. The sixth and the seventh groups of MAbs were A. hydrophila specific. They recognized seven of eight A. hydrophila isolates (AH1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8); however, the MAb in the seventh group also showed cross-reactivity to one isolate of Aeromonas caviae (AC3). The eighth MAb group recognized two isolates of A. hydrophila (AH2 and AH5) and demonstrated cross-reactivity to one isolate of Aeromonas sobria (AS1) and one isolate of A. caviae (AC3). The tenth group of MAbs bound to all isolates of Aeromonas spp. tested (AH1-8, AS1-6, AC1-5, Aeromonas veronii and Aeromonas jandaei) without cross-reactivity to any of the other bacteria tested. MAbs in the ninth group showed similar specificity to those in the tenth group but did not recognize two isolates of A. sobria (AS4 and AS6) or A. jandaei. All the MAbs could be used to identify Aeromonas by dot blotting with a sensitivity ranging from 10⁵ to 10⁷ CFU mL⁻¹. However, the sensitivity of detection was increased to 10²-10³ CFU mL⁻¹ after inoculation of the sample in tryptic soy broth for 3-6 h before performing the dot blotting. The dot blot method can be used for the direct detection of A. hydrophila infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic goldfish. This study demonstrated a convenient immunological tool that can be used for the direct detection of A. hydrophila and Aeromonas infections in a complex sample without the requirement for separation of the bacteria or isolation and biochemical tests.

Pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila serogroup O:14 and O:81 strains with an S layer

Five autoagglutinating Aeromonas hydrophila isolates recovered from eels and humans were assigned to serogroups O:14 and O:81 of the Sakazaki and Shimada (National Institutes of Health) scheme. They had the following properties in common: positive precipitation after boiling, moderate surface hydrophobicity (salt-aggregation-test value around 1.2), pathogenicity for fish and mice (50% lethal dose, 10(4.61) to 10(7.11)), lipopolysaccharides that contained O-polysaccharide chains of homogeneous chain length, and an external S layer peripheral to the cell wall observed by electron microscopy. A strong cross-reactivity was detected by immunoblotting between the homogeneous O-polysaccharide fraction of O:14 and O:81 strains but not between them and the lipopolysaccharide of A. hydrophila TF7 (O:11 reference strain). Outer membrane fractions of these strains contained a predominant 53- to 54-kDa protein which was glycine extractable under low-pH (pH 2.8) conditions and was identified as the surface array protein. The S-layer proteins of the O:14 and O:81 A. hydrophila strains seemed to be primarily different from those previously purified from strains A. hydrophila TF7 and Aeromonas salmonicida A450 on the basis of colony hybridizations with both the structural genes vapA and ahsA. This is the first report of the presence of an S layer in mesophilic Aeromonas strains not belonging to serogroup O:11.

Distribution of Aeromonas hydrophila serogroups in different clinical samples and the development of polyclonal antibodies for rapid identification of the genus Aeromonas by direct agglutination

We characterized a collection of 256 Aeromonas hydrophila strains isolated from blood, discharge and stool for their serogroup designation. Of these, 2.3% were untypable and 15.2% were rough strains. Among the typable strains, about 50% comprised serogroups O:11, O:16, O:18, O:34 and O:83. To develop rapid differentiation of Aeromonas from other oxidase-positive bacteria, antisera against Aeromonas were produced to establish a direct, genus-specific, agglutination test. It was found that among 105 isolates of Aeromonas, 102 showed positive results with the agglutination test. The calculated sensitivity and specificity were 97.1% and 90.7%, respectively.