Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy

Management of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Systematic review

OBJECTIVE

(1) To evaluate the effects of surgery and conservative treatments for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and (2) provide reference for choosing the time and method of treatment.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials from inception to September 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of surgery or conservative Treatments in Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy (CSR) were selected. The primary outcomes were the neck and arm visual analog scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Secondary outcomes included active range of cervical motion (ROM) and Mental Health. Two reviewers proceeded study selection and quality assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies, which comprised a total of 464 participants were included in the final meta-analysis. Compared with conservative treatment, surgical treatment was more effective in lowering Neck-VAS (<3 m: MD = -29.44, 95% CI = (-41.62,-17.27), P < .00001; 3-6 M: MD = -20.97, 95% CI = (-26.36,-15.57), P < .00001; 6 M: MD = -13.40, 95% CI = (-19.39, -7.41), P<.0001; 12 M: MD=-15.53, 95% CI=(-28.38, -2.68), P=.02), Arm-VAS(<3 m: MD = -33.52, 95% CI = (-39.89, -27.16), P < .00001; 3-6 M: MD = -20.97, 95% CI = (-26.36, -15.57), P < .00001; 6 M: MD = -17.52, 95% CI=(-23.94, -11.11), P < .0001; 12 M: MD = -21.91, 95% CI=(-27.09, -16.72), P < .00001) and NDI (<3 m: MD = -8.89, 95% CI = (-11.17, -6.61), P < .00001; 6 M: MD = -5.14, 95% CI = (-7.60, -2.69), P < .0001). No significant difference was observed in NDI at 12-month time point (MD = -5.17, 95% CI = (-12.33, 2.00), P = .16), ROM(MD = 2.91, 95% CI = (-4.51, 10.33), P = .77) and Mental Health (MD = .05, 95% CI=(-.24, .33), P = .74).

CONCLUSION

The 6 included studies that had low risk of bias, providing high-quality evidence for the surgical efficacy of CSR. The evidence indicates that surgical treatment is better than conservative treatment in terms of VAS score and NDI score, and superior to conservative treatment in less than one year. There was no evidence of a difference between surgical and conservative care in ROM and mental health. A small sample study with a follow-up of 5 to 8 years showed that surgical treatment was still better than conservative treatment, but the sample size was small and the results should be carefully interpreted.Compared with conservative treatment, surgical treatment had a faster onset of response, especially in pain relief, but did not have a significant advantage in range of motion or NDI. This seems to mean that for patients with severe or even unbearable pain, the benefits of surgery as soon as possible will be significant. Although it is not clear whether the short-term risks of surgery are outweighed by the long-term benefits, rapid pain relief is necessary. Conservative treatment (including medical exercise therapy, mechanical cervical tractions, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, pain management education, and cervical collar) once or twice a week for 3 months is beneficial in the long term and avoids the risks of surgery. In consideration of the good natural history of CSR and the relatively good outcome of conservative treatment (although symptom relief is slow), we think that surgery is not necessary for patients who do not need rapid pain relief.

Fibrous Connection Between Cervical Nerve and Zygapophysial Joint and Implication of the Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: An Anatomic Cadaveric Study

STUDY DESIGN

Observational, anatomical, cadaveric study.

OBJECTIVE

We anatomically investigated the fibrous connection between the cervical nerves and the zygapophysial joint capsules.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy is caused by the compression of the cervical nerves as the static factor and head and neck movements as the dynamic factor. To understand the dynamic pathology of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, the anatomic relationship between the cervical nerves and the zygapophysial joints needs to be investigated in detail.

METHODS

In 11 cadavers, we dissected both sides from the C5 to C7. For macroscopic examination, we observed structures connecting the cervical nerves and the zygapophysial joints in 18 cervical nerves from three cadavers. In 14 sides of eight cadavers, we histologically analyzed the fibrous structures and their attachments.

RESULTS

Macroscopically, the fibrous band connected the cranial surface of the cervical nerve to the lateral and inferior aspects of the transverse process. In four of 18 nerves, the fibrous bands were divided into two fascicles by loose connective tissues. In addition, the fibrous bands extended along the dorsal aspect of the posterior tubercle of the transverse process and attached to the zygapophysial joint capsule. Histologically, densely stained fibrous tissues overlaid the zygapophysial joint capsule and extended to the recess between the posterior tubercle and inferior articular process on the cranial vertebral body.

CONCLUSION

We macroscopically and histologically clarified the fibrous bands connecting the cervical nerve to the zygapophysial joint capsule. The fibrous bands may help clarify the pathology of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy associated with the zygapophysial joints as dynamic factors.Level of Evidence: N/A.

Stenosis and Neurologic Level Discrepancies in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

BACKGROUND

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common cause of cord dysfunction in older individuals. CSM involves either the upper motor neuron or lower motor neuron (LMN) in the cervical spine. The neurologic level of the LMN lesion does not usually correspond with the structural level detected via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between the structural level of stenosis and the neurologic level of LMN involvement in patients with CSM.

DESIGN

Retrospective descriptive study.

SETTING

Tertiary hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, aged 41-79 years.

METHODS

We reviewed electromyography (EMG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings from 17 patients with CSM to objectively show the relation between the structural level of stenosis and the neurologic level with LMN involvement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The structural level was defined by spinal canal stenosis with definite cord compression on MRI. The neurologic level was determined by myotomes with abnormal spontaneous activity on EMG.

RESULTS

In all patients but one, myotomes with abnormal spontaneous EMG activity were one to 4 levels lower than the stenotic canal shown on MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

LMN involvement in CSM is usually not concordant with the structural lesion. For accurate diagnosis and treatment, physicians should recognize that myotomal involvement in CSM is often due to canal stenosis one to 4 levels above the lesion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The effect of cervical traction combined with conventional therapy on grip strength on patients with cervical radiculopathy

Objective: To determine if combining intermittent cervical traction with conventional physical therapy methods is more effective than using conventional approaches alone in the improvement of the grip strength and treatment of the patients with unilateral cervical 7 (C7) radiculopathy.

Design: Randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Setting: An outpatient physical therapy clinic, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science, Iran.

Patients: A sample of convenience of 30 patients with unilateral C7 radiculopathy participated in this study. Patients were assigned randomly to a control (N=15, mean age=46.939 ±5.32) and an experimental group (N=15, mean age=47.53 ±5.6).

Interventions: Electrotherapyu/exercise treatment for control group and combined cervical traction and electrotherapyu/exercise for experimental group. Ten physical therapy sessions, three times a week for each group.

Main outcome measures: Grip strength as an appropriate objective parameter was measured before treatment and after 5 and 10 treatment sessions.

Results: Statistical analysis (paired t-test) revealed significant increase in grip strength after 10 treatment sessions in control (p<0.01) and experimental group (p<0.01) compared with pretreatment score. In the ANCOVA, controlling for pretest scores, no significant difference was found between the two groups in the after 10 treatment sessions grip score (p=0.65). However, the change in grip strength after five sessions was significantly greater for the experimental group than for the control group (P=0.04).

Conclusions: The application of cervical traction combined with electrotherapy and exercise produced an immediate improvement in the hand grip function in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Predictors of Motor Weakness and Delayed Recovery in Cervical Disk Herniation

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the significant risk factors for motor weakness caused by cervical disk herniation and for delayed recovery after surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There were a few clinical trials for detecting the significant risk factors for motor weakness after anterior cervical surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined 72 patients with degenerative disk disease of the cervical spine who were treated with single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. The possible risk factors, including age, sex, symptom duration, operation time, surgery level, preoperative radiologic parameters, and preoperative Neck Disability Index score, were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The patients included 22 women and 50 men; average age, 47.1±7.8 years. Of these 72 patients, 38 (52.8%) patients had motor deficit before surgery. Complete recovery of motor deficit was seen in 33 (86.8%) patients, and the average duration from surgery to complete recovery was 4.2 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that disk height (P=0.001, odds ratio=0.32), percentage of herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) in the spinal canal (P=0.0012, odds ratio=1.24), and presence of signal intensity change in the spinal cord (P=0.0015, odds ratio=35.57) were important risk factors for motor weakness. When the cut-off value of disk height was 5.8 mm, the sensitivity and specificity were 39.5% and 94.1%, respectively. When the cut-off value of HNP in the spinal canal was 28.1%, the sensitivity and specificity were 57.9% and 82.4%, respectively. Furthermore, signal intensity change was identified as an important risk factor for delayed recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased disk height, percentage of HNP in the spinal canal, or presence of signal intensity change in the spinal cord seem to be the important risk factors for motor weakness in patients with cervical disk herniation. Moreover, the presence of signal intensity change in the spinal cord seems to be an important risk factor for delayed recovery.

Use of a multimodal conservative management protocol for the treatment of a patient with cervical radiculopathy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to describe and discuss the treatment of a cervical disk herniation using a sequential multimodal conservative management approach.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 40-year-old man had complaints of headache and severe sharp neck pain radiating to his left shoulder down to his arm, forearm, and hand. Results of electromyography/nerve conduction studies were abnormal. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large disk protrusion at C5-C6 with indentation of the thecal sac and a spur at the posterior margin. Moderate left neural foraminal narrowing was present at C5-C6 with narrowed intervertebral disk space at C5-C6 and C6-C7.

INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME

High-velocity, low-amplitude chiropractic manipulation; electrotherapy; ice; and exercise were used for treatment. The Neck Disability Index was used as a primary and electromyography/nerve conduction studies as a secondary outcome measurement. Based on the Neck Disability Index, there was an overall 89.65% symptoms improvement from the baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

This case study demonstrated possible beneficial effects of the multimodal treatment approach in a patient with cervical radiculopathy.

Pain patterns and descriptions in patients with radicular pain: does the pain necessarily follow a specific dermatome?

Background

It is commonly stated that nerve root pain should be expected to follow a specific dermatome and that this information is useful to make the diagnosis of radiculopathy. There is little evidence in the literature that confirms or denies this statement. The purpose of this study is to describe and discuss the diagnostic utility of the distribution of pain in patients with cervical and lumbar radicular pain.

Methods

Pain drawings and descriptions were assessed in consecutive patients diagnosed with cervical or lumbar nerve root pain. These findings were compared with accepted dermatome maps to determine whether they tended to follow along the involved nerve root's dermatome.

Results

Two hundred twenty-six nerve roots in 169 patients were assessed. Overall, pain related to cervical nerve roots was non-dermatomal in over two-thirds (69.7%) of cases. In the lumbar spine, the pain was non-dermatomal in just under two-thirds (64.1%) of cases. The majority of nerve root levels involved non-dermatomal pain patterns except C4 (60.0% dermatomal) and S1 (64.9% dermatomal). The sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) for dermatomal pattern of pain are low for all nerve root levels with the exception of the C4 level (Se 0.60, Sp 0.72) and S1 level (Se 0.65, Sp 0.80), although in the case of the C4 level, the number of subjects was small (n = 5).

Conclusion

In most cases nerve root pain should not be expected to follow along a specific dermatome, and a dermatomal distribution of pain is not a useful historical factor in the diagnosis of radicular pain. The possible exception to this is the S1 nerve root, in which the pain does commonly follow the S1 dermatome.

Cervical radiculopathy: pathophysiology, presentation, and clinical evaluation

Cervical radiculopathy is a common condition that usually results from compression and inflammation of the cervical nerve root or roots in the region of the neural foramen. It is frequently caused by cervical disc herniation and cervical spondylosis. The diagnosis can be established by history and physical examination, but care should be taken, as diagnoses can mimic or coexist with cervical radiculopathy, such as entrapment neuropathies. The pathophysiology, presentation, and clinical evaluation of cervical radiculopathy are discussed.

Electrodiagnosis of neck pain

The past 3 decades have witnessed tremendous advances in the field of electrodiagnostic medicine. The high-performance electronics and microprocessors available in contemporary electrodiagnostic instruments have improved the ability to detect, record, measure, and interpret the action potentials arising from the nerves and muscle fibers. With their increased ease of use and effectiveness in both diagnosis and prognosis, electrodiagnostic tests have become valuable tools in evaluation of patients with neck pain. As with any laboratory measure, the utility of electrodiagnostic testing can be increased when it is used in appropriate clinical contexts and when its limitations are understood.

The spine

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are becoming increasingly accessible in veterinary medicine. Because of their ability to image the bony spine and spinal cord noninvasively and with exceptional detail, these techniques have revolutionized the way spinal disorders are diagnosed in both people and animals. Although the veterinary literature on this topic is limited, interpretation of CT and MR images of the spine are facilitated by the similarity of human and animal disease processes. This article provides an overview of imaging strategies, normal anatomy, and the CT and MRI features of degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, and vascular diseases of the spine.

Prevalence of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a door-to-door survey in a Sicilian municipality

INTRODUCTION

Because of the limited information on cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, we conducted a door-to-door two-phase survey in a Sicilian municipality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We first screened for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy among the inhabitants of the municipality: (N = 7653, as of the prevalence day, November 1, 1987). Study neurologists then investigated those subjects suspected to have had a cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Diagnoses were bases on specified criteria.

RESULTS

We found 27 subjects affected by CSR (17 definite, 10 possible). Prevalence (cases per 1000 population) was 3.5 in the total population; it increased to a peak at age 50-59 years, and decreased thereafter. The age-specific prevalence was consistently higher in women.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison with other prevalence studies shows similar age-specific patterns, but different magnitudes, which may partly reflect methodologic differences across studies.

Cervical spondylotic stenosis and myelopathy: evaluation with computed tomographic myelography

OBJECTIVE

To determine which components of cervical spondylosis are most frequently present in patients with myelopathy.

DESIGN

We reviewed the findings in 93 patients who underwent surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy between January 1986 and December 1989 at Mayo Clinic Rochester.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All 93 patients (72 men and 21 women) underwent computed tomographic (CT) myelography. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging scans were available in 25 patients, and plain CT scans were obtained in 2.

RESULTS

A review of CT myelograms revealed that all neurocompressive intraspinal spondylotic changes were reflected in the shape of the spinal cord. Among the 93 patients with myelopathy, the configuration of the spinal cord could be categorized into primarily three dominant types: A (severe encroachment that compressed the cord into the shape of a banana; N = 40), B (moderate encroachment that produced less prominent compression; N = 23), and C (moderate bilateral uncovertebral spurs; N = 12). As a comparison group, 30 patients with similar spinal cord deformities but without progressive myelopathy were analyzed. Correlation of the two groups showed that myelopathy was present in up to 98% of patients with type A spinal cord, in 75% with type B, and in 71% with type C. The findings on magnetic resonance imaging were similar to those on CT myelography, but the bony spondylotic components were less readily seen.

CONCLUSION

The precise pathophysiologic mechanism of myelopathy in spondylosis remains an enigma. Although the bulk of the data on our patients supports direct compression, we believe that the cause is multifactorial.

Cervical radiculopathy

The history, pathoanatomy and pathophysiology, clinical picture, differential diagnosis, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of cervical radiculopathy are reviewed. The review is based on a 10-year Medline literature search, review of bibliographies in textbooks, and bibliographies in articles obtained through the search. Cervical radiculopathy, although recognized early in the 20th century, was first associated with disc pathology in the mid-1930s. It is most commonly caused by disc herniation or cervical spondylosis. History and physical examination using pain location, manual muscle testing, and specialized testing (Spurling's maneuver) will usually suffice to diagnose the radiculopathy and determine the root level involved. Diagnostic imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or myelography should be used as presurgical evaluative tools or when tumor or other etiology besides disc herniation or spondylosis is suspected. Electromyography is of benefit in distinguishing various entities that clinically present similar to cervical radiculopathy and can also help to "date" the lesion. Treatment of this disorder has not been systematically studied in a controlled fashion. However, using a variety of different treatments, the radiculopathy usually improves without the need for surgery. Indications for surgery are unremitting pain despite a full trial of non-surgical management, progressive weakness, or new or progressive cervical myelopathy. Prospective studies evaluating the various treatment options would be of great benefit in guiding practitioners toward optimum cost-effective evaluation and care of the patient with cervical radiculopathy.

Myelography, CT, and MRI of the spinal canal in patients with myelopathy: a prospective study

A prospective study including myelography, CT, and MRI was performed on 36 patients with clinical signs of myelopathy. Evoked potentials and spinal fluid examinations were also carried out. Based on our findings, the patients could be classified as suffering from cryptogenic myelopathy (n = 12), multiple sclerosis (n = 6), spinal stenosis (n = 6), or miscellaneous myelopathies (n = 12). The diameter of the spinal cord was normal in the 2 first groups of patients and of same magnitude evaluated by myelography and CT, while MRI constantly gave higher figures. In only four of the patients important new information was added by CT and MRI (syringomyelia, myelitis, lipomatosis) compared with myelography, although a more precise visualization was often provided. Further diagnostic progress in patients with myelopathy of undetermined etiology may be obtained by including supplementary MRI of the brain disclosing multiple sclerosis in several cases.

Complications of cervical arthritis

Cervical arthritis can result in clinically important complications through a variety of mechanisms. The potentially most serious complication is spinal cord or nerve root compression, caused by either degenerative osteophytes or one or more of several subluxation patterns prevalent in inflammatory joint diseases. Disabling pain arising directly from the affected joints is more difficult to document but probably occurs often in the upper cervical spine, particularly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Limitation of head and neck mobility, with or without pain, commonly develops in inflammatory arthropathies, especially ankylosing spondylitis and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. In the absence of neurologic signs or symptoms, most cases of symptomatic cervical arthritis should be diagnosed and treated conservatively.

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy precipitated by decompression sickness

Images