Treatment of myasthenia gravis with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin

Plasma Exchange versus Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Worsening Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Special Attention to Faster Relapse Control

Currently used rescue interventions to prevent rapid myasthenic deterioration are plasma exchange (PLEX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). We investigated the evidence to determine whether the two methods were interchangeable or whether one was superior to the other. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021285985). Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of PLEX and IVIG in patients with moderate-to-severe myasthenia gravis (MG) were included. Five major databases were systematically searched (PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science). Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for adverse events and mean differences (MD) for changes in quantitative myasthenia gravis scores (QMG). Three RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Two investigating 114 patients in total were eligible for meta-analysis to analyze efficacy and safety. For the change in QMG score, the MD was -2.8 (95% CI: -5.614-0.113), with PLEX performing better. For adverse events, an OR of 1.04 was found (95% CI: 0.25-4.27). This study demonstrated a low risk of bias in evaluating treatment efficacy but indicated a high risk of bias in assessing procedural safety outcomes. Although the results did not show any significant difference, there was a tendency indicating faster efficacy of PLEX in the first two weeks of treatment. In such a critical clinical condition, this tendency may be clinically meaningful, but further studies should clarify this benefit.

On the path to evidence-based therapy in neuromuscular disorders

Neuromuscular disorders encompass a diverse group of acquired and genetic diseases characterized by loss of motor functionality. Although cure is the goal, many therapeutic strategies have been envisioned and are being studied in randomized clinical trials and entered clinical practice. As in all scientific endeavors, the successful clinical translation depends on the quality and translatability of preclinical findings and on the predictive value and feasibility of the clinical models. This chapter focuses on five exemplary diseases: childhood spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disorders, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), acquired autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG), and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), to illustrate the progress made on the path to evidenced-based therapy.

Current Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most extensively studied antibody-mediated disease in humans. Substantial progress has been made in the treatment of MG in the last century, resulting in a change of its natural course from a disease with poor prognosis with a high mortality rate in the early 20th century to a treatable condition with a large proportion of patients attaining very good disease control. This review summarizes the current treatment options for MG, including non-immunosuppressive and immunosuppressive treatments, as well as thymectomy and targeted immunomodulatory drugs.

Rapid and reversible responses to IVIG in autoimmune neuromuscular diseases suggest mechanisms of action involving competition with functionally important autoantibodies

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is widely used in autoimmune neuromuscular diseases whose pathogenesis is undefined. Many different effects of IVIG have been demonstrated in vitro, but few studies actually identify the mechanism(s) most important in vivo. Doses and treatment intervals are generally chosen empirically. Recent studies in Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy show that some effects of IVIG are readily reversible and highly dependent on the serum IgG level. This suggests that in some autoantibody-mediated neuromuscular diseases, IVIG directly competes with autoantibodies that reversibly interfere with nerve conduction. Mechanisms of action of IVIG which most likely involve direct competition with autoantibodies include: neutralization of autoantibodies by anti-idiotypes, inhibition of complement deposition, and increasing catabolism of pathologic antibodies by saturating FcRn. Indirect immunomodulatory effects are not as likely to involve competition and may not have the same reversibility and dose-dependency. Pharmacodynamic analyses should be informative regarding most relevant mechanism(s) of action of IVIG as well as the role of autoantibodies in the immunopathogenesis of each disease. Better understanding of the role of autoantibodies and of the target(s) of IVIG could lead to more efficient use of this therapy and better patient outcomes.

A comprehensive review and update on the biologic treatment of adult noninfectious uveitis: part II

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of adult, noninfectious uveitis remains a major challenge for ophthalmologists around the world, especially in regard to recalcitrant cases. It is reported to comprise approximately 10% of preventable blindness in the USA. The cause of uveitis can be idiopathic or associated with infectious and systemic disorders. The era of biologic medical therapies provides new options for patients with otherwise treatment-resistant inflammatory eye disease.

AREAS COVERED

This two-part review gives a comprehensive overview of the existing medical treatment options for patients with adult, noninfectious uveitis, as well as important advances for the treatment ocular inflammation. Part I covers classic immunomodulation and latest information on corticosteroid therapy. In part II, emerging therapies are discussed, including biologic response modifiers, experimental treatments and ongoing clinical studies for uveitis.

EXPERT OPINION

The hazard of chronic corticosteroid use in the treatment of adult, noninfectious uveitis is well documented. Corticosteroid-sparing therapies, which offer a very favorable risk-benefit profile when administered properly, should be substituted. Although nothing is currently approved for on-label use in this indication, many therapies, through either translation or novel basic science research, have the potential to fill the currently exposed gaps.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease in which autoantibodies interfere with neuromuscular transmission. As with other autoimmune diseases, people with myasthenia gravis would be expected to benefit from intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). This is an update of a review first published in 2003 and last updated in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy of IVIg for treating exacerbations of myasthenia gravis or for chronic myasthenia gravis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (11 October 2011), CENTRAL (2011, Issue 3), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2011) and EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2011) using 'myasthenia gravis' and 'intravenous immunoglobulin' as the search terms.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs in which IVIg was compared with no treatment, placebo or plasma exchange, in people with myasthenia gravis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author extracted the data and two others checked these data. For methodological reasons, no formal meta-analysis was performed.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified seven RCTs. These trials differ in inclusion criteria, comparison with alternative treatment and outcomes. In a trial comparing IVIg with placebo, including 51 participants with myasthenia gravis worsening, the mean difference (MD) in quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMGS) (MD 95% CI) after 14 days was: -1.60 (95% CI - 3.23 to 0.03) this result being borderline statistically significant in favour of IVIg. In an unblinded study of 87 participants with exacerbation comparing IVIg and plasma exchange there was no difference in myasthenic muscle score (MMS) after 15 days (MD -1.00; 95% CI -7.72 to 5.72). In a study of 84 participants with worsening myasthenia gravis there was no difference in change in QMGS 14 days after IVIg or plasma exchange (MD -1.50; 95% CI -3.43 to 0.43). In a study of 12 participants with moderate or severe myasthenia gravis, which was at high risk of bias from skewed allocation, the mean fall in QMGS both for IVIg and plasma exchange after four weeks was significant (P < 0.05). A study with 15 participants with mild or moderate myasthenia gravis found no difference in change in QMGS 42 days after IVIg or placebo (MD 1.60; 95% CI -1.92 to 5.12). A study included 33 participants with moderate exacerbations of myasthenia gravis and showed no difference in change in QMGS 14 days after IVIg or methylprednisolone (MD -0.42; 95% CI -1.20 to 0.36). All these three smaller studies were underpowered. The last trial, including 168 people with exacerbations, showed no evidence of superiority of IVIg 2 g/kg over IVIg 1 g/kg on the change of MMS after 15 days (MD 3.84; 95% CI -0.98 to 8.66). Adverse events due to IVIg were moderate (fever, nausea, headache), self-limiting and subjectively less severe than with plasma exchange (although, given the available data, no statistical comparison was possible). Other than where specific limitations are mentioned the trials were generally at low risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In exacerbation of myasthenia gravis, one RCT of IVIg versus placebo showed some evidence of the efficacy of IVIg and two did not show a significant difference between IVIg and plasma exchange. Another showed no significant difference in efficacy between 1 g/kg and 2 g/kg of IVIg. A further, but underpowered, trial showed no significant difference between IVIg and oral methylprednisolone. In chronic myasthenia gravis, there is insufficient evidence from RCTs to determine whether IVIg is efficacious.

On the concept of myasthenic crisis

This article reviews controversies surrounding the concept of myasthenic crisis. Literature review and our own experience demonstrate that there is disagreement about how a crisis should be defined, what the implications of a crisis are, whether crises are preventable, and how crisis incidence should be calculated. We propose that crisis be defined as weakness from acquired myasthenia gravis that is severe enough to necessitate intubation or delayed extubation following surgery. We argue that crisis need not "doom" a myasthenic patient to a different prognosis or response to therapy compared with myasthenic patients with severe generalized weakness. Finally, we argue that crisis is preventable and that crisis incidence, calculated in a standardized fashion, could be a useful outcome measure.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease in which autoantibodies interfere with neuromuscular transmission. As with other autoimmune diseases, people with myasthenia gravis would be expected to benefit from intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to examine the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin for treating exacerbations of myasthenia gravis or for chronic myasthenia gravis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease GroupTrials Register (April 2007) and MEDLINE (January 1966 to May 2007) using 'myasthenia gravis' and 'intravenous immunoglobulin' as the search terms.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised or quasi-randomised trials in which intravenous immunoglobulin was compared with no treatment, placebo or plasma exchange, in people with myasthenia gravis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author extracted the data and two others checked these data and the source from which they were derived. For methodological reasons, no formal meta-analysis was performed.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified six randomised controlled trials, all of which investigated short-term benefit. A trial of IVIg compared with placebo including 51 patients provided evidence for the effectiveness of IVIg in myasthenia gravis worsening. A study of 87 participants with exacerbation found no statistically significant difference between immunoglobulin and plasma exchange after two weeks. A study of 12 participants with moderate or severe myasthenia gravis treated in a crossover design trial found no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of immunoglobulin and plasma exchange after four weeks. A study with 15 participants with mild or moderate myasthenia gravis found no statistically significant difference in efficacy of IVIg and placebo after six weeks. A study included 33 participants with moderate exacerbations of myasthenia gravis and showed no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of IVIg and methylprednisolone. The last trial including 173 people with myasthenia gravis exacerbations, showed no superiority of IVIg 1 g/kg on two consecutive days over IVIg 1 g/kg on a single day.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In exacerbation of myasthenia gravis, one randomised controlled trial of IVIg versus placebo demonstrated the efficacy of IVIg and another did not show a significant difference between IVIg and plasma exchange. Another showed no significant difference in efficacy between 1 g/kg and 2 g/kg of IVIg. A further, but underpowered, trial showed no significant difference between IVIg and oral methylprednisolone. In chronic myasthenia gravis, there is insufficient evidence from randomised trials to determine whether IVIg is efficacious. More research is needed to determine whether IVIg reduces the need for corticosteroids as suggested by two case series.

Guidelines on the use of intravenous immune globulin for neurologic conditions

Canada's per capita use of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) grew by approximately 115% between 1998 and 2006, making Canada one of the world's highest per capita users of IVIG. It is believed that most of this growth is attributable to off-label usage. To help ensure IVIG use is in keeping with an evidence-based approach to the practice of medicine, the National Advisory Committee on Blood and Blood Products (NAC) and Canadian Blood Services convened a panel of national experts to develop an evidence-based practice guideline on the use of IVIG for neurologic conditions. The mandate of the expert panel was to review evidence regarding use of IVIG for 22 neurologic conditions and formulate recommendations on IVIG use for each. A panel of 6 clinical experts, one expert in practice guideline development and 4 representatives from the NAC met to review the evidence and reach consensus on the recommendations for the use of IVIG. The primary sources used by the panel were 2 recent evidence-based reviews. Recommendations were based on interpretation of the available evidence and, where evidence was lacking, consensus of expert clinical opinion. A draft of the practice guideline was circulated to neurologists in Canada for feedback. The results of this process were reviewed by the expert panel, and modifications to the draft guideline were made where appropriate. This practice guideline will provide the NAC with a basis for making recommendations to provincial and territorial health ministries regarding IVIG use management. Recommendations for use of IVIG were made for 14 conditions, including acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, dermatomyositis, diabetic neuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, multifocal motor neuropathy, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, opsoclonus-myoclonus, pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections, polymyositis, Rasmussen's encephalitis, and stiff person syndrome; IVIG was not recommended for 8 conditions including adrenoleukodystrophy, amyotropic lateral sclerosis, autism, critical illness polyneuropathy, inclusion body, myositis, intractable childhood epilepsy, paraproteinemic neuropathy (IgM variant), and POEMS syndrome. Development and dissemination of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines may help to facilitate appropriate use of IVIG.

Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in refractory uveitis

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy in patients with severe uveitis otherwise unresponsive to conventional immunomodulatory agents.

METHODS

Data on five consecutive patients treated with IVIg and followed to the present time by one of the authors (CSF) were reviewed. All patients had severe and recalcitrant uveitis of diverse etiologies. Main outcome measures were control of intraocular inflammation, steroid-sparing effect, visual acuity, and side effects.

RESULTS

The duration of IVIg therapy was 3 to 36 months (mean, 16.8 months). Treatment was effective in controlling the intraocular inflammation in 3 of 5 patients. One of those patients required maintenance of systemic steroids at a dose of 10 mg per day. Visual acuity has stabilized or improved in these three patients. No immediate or long-term side effect was observed in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy was an effective therapeutic modality in the treatment of three of five patients with severe uveitis that was unresponsive to conventional immunomodulatory agent(s). No adverse events were observed.

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of MuSK antibody-positive seronegative myasthenia gravis

We treated two patients with anti-muscle specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK)-antibody positive seronegative myasthenia gravis (MG) with high-dose intravenous gammaglobulin (IVIg) and evaluated their clinical courses. Both patients were Japanese women, MuSK-positive seronegative MG, and were unresponsive to conventional treatments, including thymectomy, steroids, and tacrolimus. The patients required frequent hospitalization for plasmapheresis. In case 1, a 45-year-old woman, it was difficult to obtain blood access for plasmapheresis. High-dose IVIg, 400 mg/kg per day for 5 days, was administered in cases 1 and 2. In both cases, clinical improvement was observed 3 days after the start of IVIg therapy and lasted for 2 to 3 months. We propose that IVIg therapy is an effective treatment for MuSK-positive seronegative MG, when conventional treatments have failed.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in paraneoplastic neurological syndromes

Combining clinical and immunological information, a neurological syndrome can now be diagnosed as a "definite" or "possible" paraneoplastic syndrome according to the newly suggested diagnostic criteria of the PNS Euronetwork. Differentiated diagnosis of a paraneoplastic syndrome is essential for differential therapy in patients. According to the response to IVIG therapy, paraneoplastic disorders may be subgrouped in group A, a clinical response is the rule (prototype Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome), and in group B, IVIG may be helpful in single patients and is indicated in specific clinical settings (prototype anti-Hu associated neurological syndromes). The mode of action of IVIG may range from direct anti-idiotype effect to indirect effects on the cellular part of the pathogenesis of paraneoplastic syndromes. Due to the therapeutic relevance, it is therefore important to diagnose a PND as early as possible, and start immunotherapy including IVIG immediately.

Intravenous immunoglobulin use for neurologic diseases

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been used primarily for immune deficiency patients, and its greatest expansion is seen more and more in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, especially in neurology. The benefits of IVIG treatment include its availability in all treatment centers and its ease of administration in an outpatient setting. This article gives an overview of some autoimmune neurologic diseases and explores the clinical evidence supporting the use of IVIG.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease in which autoantibodies interfere with neuromuscular transmission. As with other autoimmune diseases, people with myasthenia gravis would be expected to benefit from intravenous immunoglobulin.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to examine the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin for treating exacerbations of myasthenia gravis or for chronic myasthenia gravis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group trials register (March 2005) and MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2005) using 'myasthenia gravis' and 'intravenous immunoglobulin' as the search terms.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised or quasi-randomised trials in which intravenous immunoglobulin was compared with no treatment, placebo or plasma exchange, in people with myasthenia gravis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One author extracted the data and the two others checked these data and the source from which they were derived. For methodological reasons, no formal meta-analysis was performed.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified five randomised controlled trials, all of which investigated short-term benefit. The first study of 87 participants with exacerbation found no statistically significant difference between immunoglobulin and plasma exchange after two weeks. The second study of 12 participants with moderate or severe myasthenia gravis treated in a crossover design trial found no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of immunoglobulin and plasma exchange after four weeks. The third study with 15 participants with mild or moderate myasthenia gravis found no statistically significant difference in efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin and placebo after six weeks. The fourth study terminated early. It included 33 participants with moderate exacerbations of myasthenia gravis and showed no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin and methylprednisolone. The fifth trial including 173 people with myasthenia gravis exacerbations, showed no superiority of intravenous immunoglobulin 1 g/kg on two consecutive days over intravenous immunoglobulin 1 g/kg on a single day.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In severe exacerbations of myasthenia gravis, one randomised controlled trial did not show a significant difference between intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange. Another showed no significant difference in efficacy between 1 g/kg and 2 g/kg of intravenous immunoglobulin. A further trial showed no significant difference between intravenous immunoglobulin and oral methylprednisolone. In chronic myasthenia gravis, there is insufficient evidence from randomised trials to determine whether intravenous immunoglobulin is efficacious. More research is needed to determine whether intravenous immunoglobulin reduces the need for steroids as suggested by two case series.

IVIg in myasthenia gravis, Lambert Eaton myasthenic syndrome and inflammatory myopathies: current status

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is an effective tool for the treatment of diseases with immune pathogenesis. This article reviews the current knowledge of the benefits of treating with IVIg patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), Lambert Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM) and inclusion body myositis (IBM). Myasthenia gravis: Treatment of MG with IVIg was reported to be beneficial in a number of case series and two randomised controlled trials, in which efficacy was measured by clinical improvement using myasthenic muscle score and decrease in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AchRAb). According to the results, IVIg could be recommended for crisis and severe exacerbation. In many other clinical conditions, such as response to treatment of mild or moderate exacerbation, changes in steroid dosage and before thymectomy, IVIg has also been reported to be helpful, but no controlled trials to confirm its efficacy have been performed. Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: A placebo-controlled crossover study reported a significant clinical improvement in the amplitude of the resting CMAP following IVIg treatment. Further experience from case reports also indicates that IVIg is useful in patients with LEMS, both as a short- and long-term treatment, especially when immunosuppressive drugs are not fully effective. Inflammatory myopathies/dermatomyositis: In a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial in patients with DM resistant to other treatments, IVIg was shown to produce a significant increase of muscle strength as well as a marked improvement in immunopathological parameters in repeated muscle biopsies (before and after IVIg). Thus, IVIg is an important therapy in patients with DM resistant to other conventional therapies. Polymyositis: No randomised trials have been undertaken. One study showed clinical improvement and a reduction in the need of prednisone in patients with chronic refractory PM. Inclusion body myositis: Three controlled trials showed some muscle strength improvement, although the changes did not reach statistical significance. However improvement in swallowing was repeatedly observed, suggesting that some patients with severe dysphagia may derive a modest benefit from IVIg therapy.

CONCLUSION

Controlled trials indicate that in MG, LEMS, and DM, IVIg at a total dose of 2 g/kg is a highly useful therapy. Uncontrolled trials and case reports indicate benefit in many different clinical situations, but further clinical investigation is required.

Dental management of patients with myasthenia gravis: A literature review

Myasthenia gravis is a chronic neuromuscular disease characterized by muscular weakness and fatigability. Dental management of patients diagnosed with myasthenia gravis presents a challenge to the dental profession. A MEDLINE search of the English medical (limited to provision in dental care) and dental literature on myasthenia gravis and dental management published between 1975 and 2004 was conducted. In the dental literature, 12 articles were found, and only a few focused on myasthenia gravis and dental care. The purpose of this article was to review and summarize the clinical signs and symptoms associated with myasthenia gravis, highlighting the role of the dental profession in the process of the diagnosis and management of the oral and dental complications that might be associated with the disease, while avoiding myasthenic crisis.

Immunomodulatory Effects of Intravenous Immunoglobulins as a Treatment for Autoimmune Diseases, Cancer, and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is a safe preparation, made of human plasma of thousands of healthy donors. The fascinating history of gamma globulin therapy begins in 1930 when Finland treated pneumococcal pneumonia patients with equine serum, which prolonged their survival from pneumonia. Since then, significant breakthroughs were achieved by Cohn, Bruton, Imbach, and others, whose clinical contribution to the world of medicine was of great importance. Originally IVIG was used to treat immunodeficiencies. Later on the use of IVIG extended to autoimmune diseases as well. The efficacy of IVIG has been established only in several autoimmune diseases; clinical reports of trials, series, and case reports indicate significant improvement in many more autoimmune diseases. IVIG have also showed antimetastatic effects in a variety of cancer cell lines, as well as in a few case reports. The efficiency of IVIG has also been observed in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), either as a result of an autoimmune disease or spontaneous. Several attempts were made to discover the immunomodulatory effects of IVIG, but it is still not fully understood. Clearly IVIG has multiple mechanisms of actions, which are thought to cooperate synergistically. One of the main mechanisms of actions of IVIG is its ability to neutralize pathogenic autoantibodies via anti-idiotypic antibodies within IVIG preparation. The ability of IVIG to neutralize pathogenic autoantibodies is of great importance in many autoimmune diseases, as well as in RPL. In cancer cell lines, IVIG modulates the immune system in a few ways, including the induction of IL-12 secretion, which consequently activates natural killer cells, and the induction of expression of proapoptotic genes only in cancer cells. Side effects from IVIG are rare and mostly mild and transient. More importantly adverse effects can be minimized by administration to a selective patient population in a proper way: slow infusion rate of 0.4 g/Kg body weight IVIG for 5 consecutive days, given in monthly cycles. The only downside of IVIG therapy is its high price. Therefore, clinicians should balance efficiency versus cost in deciding whether or not to treat certain conditions with IVIG.

Antiglycolipid antibodies in Guillain-Barré syndrome and related diseases: Review of clinical features and antibody specificities

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy that usually develops following a respiratory or intestinal infection. Although the pathogenic mechanisms of GBS have not been fully established, both humoral and cell-mediated immune factors have been shown to contribute to the disease process. Several antiglycosphingolipid (anti-GSL) antibodies have been found in the sera of patients with GBS or related diseases. Measurements of these antibody titers are very important in the diagnosis of GBS and in evaluating the effectiveness of treatments in clinical trials. The most common treatment strategies for these disorders involve plasmapheresis and the use of steroids for reducing anti-GSL antibody titers to ameliorate patients' clinical symptoms. Administration of intravenous immunoglobulin may also be beneficial in the treatment of neuropathies by suppressing the immune-mediated processes that are directed against antigenic targets in myelin and axons. In certain demyelinating neuropathies, the destruction or malfunctioning of the blood-nerve barrier, which results in the leakage of circulating antibodies into the peripheral nerve parenchyma, has been considered to be an initial step in development of the disease process. In addition, anti-GSL antibodies, such as anti-GM1, may cause nerve dysfunction and injury by interfering with the ion channel function at the nodes of Ranvier, where carbohydrate epitopes of glycoconjugates are located. These malfunctions thus contribute to the pathogenic mechanisms of certain demyelinating neuropathies.

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG): modes of action in the clinical management of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and selected autoimmune disorders

Recurrent pregnancy loss has been associated with autoimmune responses to membrane phospholipids and alloimmune reactions against paternally derived molecules on the trophoblast. The problem is psychologically and economically stressful as it undermines the capacity of some couples to reproduce and participate effectively in the day-to-day economic activities. This article reviews the adoption of intravenous immunoglobulin as a form of therapy for the clinical management of recurrent pregnancy loss and of selected autoimmune disorders. Side effects, contraindications and safety of use are discussed.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in the preparation of thymectomy for myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVES

A clinical trial including six patients was conducted to assess the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in the preparation of thymectomy for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Six consecutive patients of type IIB MG treated with IVIg at a dose 0.4 g/kg daily for 5 days before thymectomy were enrolled in this study.

RESULTS

All patients responded positively to this treatment. Improvement began to occur 1-9 days after starting the injection (mean 3.33 days), and reached a maximum in 3-19 days (mean 6.50 days). Thymectomy was performed 9-13 days (mean 11.20 days) after starting the injection in five of the six patients with uneventful post-operative courses.

CONCLUSION

IVIg might be an alternative to plasmapheresis (PE) in the prethymectomy preparation of MG patients, and thymectomy should be performed within 2 weeks after IVIg treatment to minimize the perioperative complications. Controlled trial vs PE enrolling more patients is needed to assess the significance of the IVIg in the preparation of thymectomy for patients of MG.

Intravenous immunoglobulin monotherapy in long-term treatment of myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate effectiveness of long-term treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

BACKGROUND

There are no definitive studies showing effectiveness of IVIG therapy in long-term treatment of MG. Most studies have investigated the acute treatment of MG with IVIG. We describe our experience with long-term treatment of MG with IVIG in six patients.

METHODS

Acute treatment of MG by IVIG therapy has been well established in the literature. We describe six patients who were treated on a long-term basis with IVIG therapy. All of these patients had positive acetylcholine receptor antibody titers. They all received initial infusion for 5 days of IVIG at a dose of 400 mg/kg/day followed by maintenance therapy of 400 mg/kg for 1 day every 3-4 months. These patients were followed for 2 years. All other medications, including prednisone and cholingeric drugs such as Mestinon, were gradually weaned. For the last years, each of these patients maintained better than functional class 2 on an average of 1.5-2.2+/-0.5 grades on the University of Virginia modification of Ossermann's classification scale for MG. They were solely treated with IVIG infusion every 3-4 months without any other concomitant medications. Three of the patients had previously undergone thymectomies. None of the patients noticed any worsening in their scores on the University of Virginia modification of Ossermann's classification worse than Grade II in the last 2 years. There were no complications related to IVIG therapy, and all patients tolerated a single infusion of IVIG every 3-4 months at 400 mg/kg for 1 day.

RESULTS

Our study demonstrates that IVIG maintenance is effective treatment of MG in selected patients and it is well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

IVIG therapy is a convenient, effective therapy when used selectively for treatment of MG on a long-term basis without any significant side effects.

Randomized, controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin in myasthenia gravis

We initiated a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment in myasthenia gravis (MG). Patients received IVIG 2 gm/kg at induction and 1 gm/kg after 3 weeks vs. 5% albumin placebo. The primary efficacy measurement was the change in the quantitative MG Score (QMG) at day 42. Fifteen patients were enrolled (6 to IVIG; 9 to placebo) before the study was terminated because of insufficient IVIG inventories. At day 42, there was no significant difference in primary or secondary outcome measurements between the two groups. In a subsequent 6-week open-label study of IVIG, positive trends were observed.

Paradigm shift in surgical approaches to thymectomy

BACKGROUND

Thymectomy is an established therapy in the management of myasthenia gravis (MG) used in conjunction with medical treatment. The optimal surgical approach to thymectomy, however, has remained controversial.

METHOD

The present review discusses the author's experiences of and the literature regarding the management of MG using the video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) approach.

RESULTS

This approach was shown to be technically safe in experienced hands and associated with less postoperative pain, better preservation of lung function in the early postoperative period and better cosmetic results than alternative techniques. The intermediate term results of VATS are comparable to those of more radical approaches. It is hoped that this patient-friendly approach will lead to greater support by patients and their neurologists, for earlier surgery.

CONCLUSION

VATS is an attractive, alternative approach to thymectomy.

Immunoglobulin treatment versus plasma exchange in patients with chronic moderate to severe myasthenia gravis

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment with plasma exchange in patients suffering from moderate to severe myasthenia gravis (MG) in a stable phase. There are no controlled studies comparing IVIG with plasma exchange in patients who despite immunosuppressive treatment have persistent incapacitating MG symptoms. This was a controlled crossover study. Twelve patients with generalized moderate to severe MG on immunosuppressive treatment for at least 12 months were included. The patients were evaluated clinically using a quantified MG clinical score (QMGS) before and at follow-up visits after each treatment. One week after the treatments, the patients who received plasma exchange treatment showed a significant improvement in QMGS compared to baseline but although some improvement was seen after IVIG this did not reach statistical significance. Four weeks after both plasma exchange and IVIG treatments, there was a significant improvement in QMGS compared to baseline. One week and 4 weeks after treatment, no significant difference between the 2 treatments was found. Both treatments have a clinically significant effect 4 weeks out in patients with chronic MG, but the improvement has a more rapid onset after plasma exchange than after IVIG.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of autoimmune neuromuscular diseases: present status and practical therapeutic guidelines

This review summarizes the current status of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in the treatment of autoimmune neuromuscular disorders and the possible mechanisms of action of the drug based on work in vivo, in vitro, and in animal models. Supply of idiotypic antibodies, suppression of antibody production, or acceleration of catabolism of immunoglobulin G (IgG) are relevant in explaining the efficacy of IVIg in myasthenia gravis (MG), Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), and antibody-mediated neuropathies. Suppression of pathogenic cytokines has putative relevance in inflammatory myopathies and demyelinating neuropathies. Inhibition of complement binding and prevention of membranolytic attack complex (MAC) formation are relevant in dermatomyositis (DM), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and MG. Modulation of Fc receptors or T-cell function is relevant in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), GBS, and inflammatory myopathies. The clinical efficacy of IVIg, based on controlled clinical trials conducted in patients with GBS, CIDP, multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), DM, MG, LEMS, paraproteinemic IgM anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) demyelinating polyneuropathies, and inclusion body myositis is summarized and practical issues related to each disorder are addressed. The present role of IVIg therapy in other disorders based on small controlled or uncontrolled trials is also summarized. Finally, safety issues, risk factors, adverse reactions, spurious results or serological tests, and practical guidelines associated with the administration of IVIg in the treatment of neuromuscular disorders are presented.

Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for ocular cicatricial pemphigoid: a preliminary study

OBJECTIVE

To report the effects of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment of ten patients with progressive ocular cicatricial pemphigoid who did not respond to conventional immunomodulatory regimens.

DESIGN

Noncomparative, interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten patients with biopsy-proven progressive cicatricial pemphigoid affecting the eyes who did not respond adequately to other local and systemic immunosuppressive treatment regimens.

INTERVENTION

Intravenous infusions of pooled human immunoglobulin, 2 to 3 g/kg body weight/cycle, divided over 3 days, and repeated every 2 to 6 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reduction in conjunctival inflammation, prevention of progression of subepithelial conjunctival fibrosis, improvement in ocular symptoms (discomfort, photophobia), improved visual acuity, reduction in extraocular mucosal lesions.

RESULTS

Clinical deterioration was arrested and resolution of chronic conjunctivitis was documented in all ten patients. Maximum therapeutic effect was observed and maintained after a minimum of 4 cycles of therapy; three patients required 12 cycles before disease control. The duration of therapy in these ten patients has been 16 to 23 months (mean, 19.3 months) with no treatment-induced side effects. Extraocular mucosal lesion resolution has occurred in all but one patient, Visual acuity has stabilized or improved in all ten patients, and subjective complaints of discomfort and photophobia have decreased in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous immunoglobulin immunomodulatory therapy can be a safe and effective therapy for otherwise treatment-resistant ocular cicatricial pemphigoid.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for myasthenia gravis

Thymectomy is an established therapy in the management of generalized myasthenia gravis, in addition to medical treatment. However, the optimal surgical approach to thymectomy has remained controversial. There are advocates for transternal, transcervical approaches or "maximal" thymectomy. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) presents a new approach to thymectomy and forms the basis of this article, in which we discuss patient selection, technique, and results. We believe complete thymectomy, comparable with the transternal approach, could be achieved by VATS. Our intermediate-term results compare well with other surgical techniques. By minimizing chest wall trauma, VATS not only causes less postoperative pain, shortens hospital stay, gives better cosmetic results but also leads to wider acceptance by patients (and their neurologists) for earlier surgery. However, the true role of this approach in thoracic surgery awaits long-term results.

Treatment of myasthenia gravis with methylprednisolone pulse: a double blind study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of one single intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) pulse therapy in myasthenia gravis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a double blind placebo controlled study (2+2 g IVMP vs placebo) in patients with moderate MG.

RESULTS

A mean increase in muscle function of 27 points was found in the treatment group after one IVMP pulse as compared with a 0.7 point increase in the placebo group (P<0.01). In the IVMP group 8 of 10 patients showed a positive treatment response. The mean duration of improvement after IVMP was 8 weeks (range 4-14 weeks). No severe side effects were found. Acetylcholine receptor antibody concentrations were unchanged in spite of the positive treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that a single IVMP treatment is efficacious and safe in the treatment of moderate MG.

The management and outcome of patients with myasthenia gravis treated acutely in a neurological intensive care unit

The management and clinical course of patients with myasthenia gravis admitted to a neurological intensive therapy unit (ITU) over a 66 month period were reviewed. Twenty-seven patients were admitted in myasthenic crisis, eight of whom had multiple admissions. One patient had a cholinergic crisis and a further patient an acute myocardial infarction. A specific aetiological factor precipitating myasthenic crisis was identified in 19 instances: infection (8), reduction in medication (5), menstruation (4), and steroid administration (2). Thirteen patients with crisis had had a previous thymectomy, six with thymoma. Twenty-three out of 35 (66%) patients admitted in crisis required intubation; nine subsequently needed a tracheostomy. Twenty-nine patients received plasma exchange and seven intravenous immunoglobulin. Four patients in myasthenic crisis died in ITU [adult respiratory distress syndrome (1), disseminated intravascular coagulation and cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonitis (1), cardiac failure (1) and multiple organ failure (1)]. Appropriate management of myasthenia gravis requires the easy availability of specialised neuro-intensive care facilities. Copyright Rapid Science Ltd

Thymectomy: its role in the management of myasthenia gravis

The management and clinical course of patients with myasthenia gravis admitted to a neurological intensive therapy unit (ITU) for thymectomy over a 66 month period were reviewed. There were 53 patients, 20 male and 33 female, mean age 35.2 years (18-74) and median ITU stay of 5 days (2-30). Indications for thymectomy were thymic enlargement on computed tomography (34%), persistence of generalized symptoms (38%), a combination of both (20%), steroid side effects or dependency (4%) and progressive bulbar symptoms (4%). Following thymectomy, thymic histology revealed thymic follicular hyperplasia (26/53; 49%), atrophy (11/53; 21%), thymoma (12/53; 23%) and normal thymus (4/53; 8%). Post-operatively 23% required prolonged intubation (> 48 hrs); two patients required a tracheostomy 10 and 13 days post-operatively. Plasma exchange was required for two patients (3.8%) due to persistent severe myasthenic weakness. Three patients (6%) developed a post-operative chest infection and one pseudomembranous colitis. There were no post-operative mortalities during the study period. After 2 years, 35% of patients were in remission and 46% had ocular or mild generalized symptoms only. Thymectomy for myasthenia gravis is followed by sustained clinical improvement in the majority of patients. The appropriate post-operative management of these patients is best undertaken in a specialized neuro-intensive care setting. Copyright Rapid Science Ltd

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment of children with autism

Since autism has been associated with immunologic abnormalities suggesting an autoimmune cause of autistic symptoms in a subset of patients, this study was undertaken to investigate whether intravenous immunoglobulin (i.v.Ig) would improve autistic symptoms. Ten autistic children with immunologic abnormalities, demonstrated on blood tests, were enrolled in this study. Their ages ranged from 4 to 17 years, with two girls and eight boys. Eight children (1 female and 7 male) historically had undergone autistic regression. Intravenous immunoglobulin, 200 to 400 mg/kg, was administered every 6 weeks for an intended treatment program of four infusions. In five children, there was no detectable change in behavior during the treatment program. In four children, there was a mild improvement noted in attention span and hyperactivity. In none of these children did the parents feel that the improvement was sufficient to warrant further continuation of the infusions beyond the termination of the program. Only in one child was there a very significant improvement, with almost total amelioration of autistic symptoms over the time period of the four infusions. Once the treatment program was completed, this child gradually deteriorated over a 5-month time period and fully reverted to his previous autistic state. In this treatment program, five children had no response to intravenous immunoglobulin. In the four children who showed mild improvements, those improvements may simply have been due to nonspecific effects of physician intervention and parental expectation (ie, placebo effect). However, in one child there was a very significant amelioration of autistic symptoms. There were no distinguishing historic or laboratory features in this child who improved. Given a positive response rate of only 10% in this study, along with the high economic costs of the immunologic evaluations and the intravenous immunoglobulin treatments, the use of intravenous immunoglobulin to treat autistic children should be undertaken only with great caution, and only under formal research protocols.

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin in transient neonatal myasthenia gravis

A preterm newborn had transient neonatal myasthenia gravis and was mechanically ventilated for 9 days. In addition to the usual supportive care, she was treated with neostigmine and underwent two exchange transfusions. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (2 gm/kg) was used for the first time in transient neonatal myasthenia gravis to the best of our knowledge. The clinical and laboratory responses are presented.

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment of neurological autoimmune diseases

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been widely used in neurological diseases during the last decade. The current indications of IVIg in neurological diseases are reviewed and discussed on the basis of the available experimental data and clinical trials. Compared to other immunomodulating treatments used in neurological diseases, IVIg has only few side effects with a small risk of transmission of infectious agents. Good clinical evidence for the effectiveness is available for Guillain-Barré-Syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and multifocal motor neuropathy. In conditions like myasthenia gravis and myositis favourable effects of IVIg were reported, but future studies have to be awaited. For all other neurological conditions where IVIg has been administered, there is currently no support for the use of IVIg other than in controlled trials. In conclusion, IVIg is a promising immunomodulary therapy that has been shown to be effective in some neurological autoimmune diseases. Routine use in neurological practice should be restricted to diseases for which a positive effect has been proven in controlled trials. For all other conditions no definite recommendations can presently be made.

[Therapeutic plasma exchange 1996]

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an extracorporeal blood purification technique to remove large molecular weight substances. Since the late seventies TPE was used in a variety of diseases in which humoral factors may play a part in the pathogenesis. Today, accepted indications only exist for a few entities in defined situations: Anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody mediated disease, TTP/HUS, Guillain-Barré-syndrome, hyperviscosity syndrome, chronic polyneuropathy associated with IgG and IgA gammopathy, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and myasthenia gravis.

Acquired myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis, an antibody-mediated disorder of neuromuscular transmission that produces clinical weakness, may be ocular or generalized. Clinical diagnostic evaluation may be supplemented by electrophysiologic studies and antibody testing. Therapeutic options, including anticholinesterase inhibitors, immunosuppressive agents, plasmapheresis and thymectomy, are tailored for the individual patient. This article emphasizes the key aspects of the clinical evaluation, diagnosis, and therapy.

Clinical trial of plasma exchange and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin in myasthenia gravis. Myasthenia Gravis Clinical Study Group

We have conducted a trial to randomly assess the efficacy and tolerance of intravenous immunoglobulin (i.v.Ig) or plasma exchange (PE) in myasthenia gravis (MG) exacerbation and to compare two doses of i.v.Ig. Eighty-seven patients with MG exacerbation were randomized to receive either three PE (n = 41), or i.v.Ig (n = 46) 0.4 gm/kg daily further allocated to 3 (n = 23) or 5 days (n = 23). The main end point was the variation of a myasthenic muscular score (MSS) between randomization and day 15. The MSS variation was similar in both groups (median value, +18 in the PE group and +15.5 in the i.v.Ig group, p = 0.65). Similar efficacy, although slightly reduced in the 5-day group was observed with both i.v.Ig schedules. The tolerance of i.v.Ig was better than that of PE with a total of 14 side effects observed in 9 patients, 8 in the PE group and 1 in the i.v.Ig group (p = 0.01). Although our trial failed to show a pronounced difference in the efficacy of both treatments, it exhibited a very limited risk for i.v.Ig. i.v.Ig is an alternative for the treatment of myasthenic crisis. The small sample sizes in our trial, however, could explain why a difference in efficacy was not observed. Further studies are needed to compare PE with i.v.Ig and to determine the optimal dosage of i.v.Ig.

The current place of high-dose immunoglobulins in the treatment of neuromuscular disorders

High-dose immunoglobulins for intravenous administration (IVIg) have originally been developed for substitution therapy in hypogammaglobulinemia. Over the last decade they are increasingly used in the treatment of immune-mediated diseases. In this review the results in immune-mediated neuromuscular diseases are summarized. Positive effects are demonstrated in open studies in dermato- and polymyositis, myasthenia gravis, and inflammatory neuropathies. Properly conducted randomized clinical trials demonstrating the effect of IVIg are available in dermatomyositis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, and smaller ones in multifocal motor neuropathy. In myasthenia gravis a trial is at present underway and only interim results are available. The results of a trial in the Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome are in the process of publication. The therapeutic approach in individual patients is discussed, but often appears to be difficult. Considering chronic treatment with IVIg, proper long-term studies including cost-benefit studies are needed. Future developments aim for combination therapies, since IVIg and immune suppressants like prednisone are suggested to have a synergistic effect.

Myasthenia gravis

Adult-onset myasthenia gravis is an acquired autoimmune disorder of neuromuscular transmission in which acetylcholine receptor antibodies attack the postsynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. Although the cause of this disease is unknown, the role of immune responses in its pathogenesis is well established. Circulating acetylcholine receptor antibodies are present in 80% to 90% of patients with the generalized form of myasthenia gravis. Most patients have ptosis, diplopia, dysarthria and dysphagia. The weakness and fatigue worsen on exertion and improve with rest. Respiratory muscle and limb weakness are rare at the onset of the disease. For the past two decades, there has been considerable progress in understanding the diagnosis and management of myasthenia gravis. The diagnosis is based on clinical presentation, neurologic examination, and confirmation by means of electrophysiologic testing and immunologic studies. Myasthenia gravis mimics many neuromuscular diseases and even illnesses such as depression and chronic fatigue syndrome. One should always exclude drug-induced myasthenia gravis for all patients. With the introduction of new modalities of treatment, particularly immunosuppressive or immunomodulating drugs, plasma exchange and thymectomy, the morbidity and mortality of myasthenia gravis have decreased dramatically to the point that myasthenia gravis should not be considered as serious a disease as it once was. Although the several therapeutic options are usually effective and have meant independence in daily life to many patients with myasthenia gravis, well-designed, controlled, prospective studies are still lacking.