Moclobemide versus clomipramine in the treatment of depression: a multicentre trial in Spain

Moclobemide: therapeutic use and clinical studies

Moclobemide is a reversible inhibitor of monoamine-oxidase-A (RIMA) and has been extensively evaluated in the treatment of a wide spectrum of depressive disorders and less extensively studied in anxiety disorders. Nearly all meta-analyses and most comparative studies indicated that in the acute management of depression this drug is more efficacious than placebo and as efficacious as tricyclic (or some heterocyclic) antidepressants or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). There is a growing evidence that moclobemide is not inferior to other antidepressants in the treatment of subtypes of depression, such as dysthymia, endogenous (unipolar and bipolar), reactive, atypical, agitated, and retarded depression as with other antidepressants limited evidence suggests that moclobemide has consistent long-term efficacy. However, more controlled studies addressing this issue are needed. For patients with bipolar depression the risk of developing mania seems to be not higher with moclobemide than with other antidepressants. The effective therapeutic dose range for moclobemide in most acute phase trials was 300 to 600 mg, divided in 2 to 3 doses. While one controlled trial and one long-term open-label study found moclobemide to be efficacious in social phobia, three controlled trials subsequently revealed either no effect or less robust effects with the tendency of higher doses (600 - 900 mg/d) to be more efficacious. Two comparative trials demonstrated moclobemide to be as efficacious as fluoxetine or clomipramine in patients suffering from panic disorder. Placebo-controlled trials in this indication are, however, still lacking. A relationship between the plasma concentration of moclobemide and its therapeutic efficacy is not apparent but a positive correlation with adverse events has been found. Dizziness, nausea and insomnia occurred more frequently on moclobemide than on placebo. Due to negligible anticholinergic and antihistaminic actions, moclobemide has been better tolerated than tri- or heterocyclic antidepressants. Gastrointestinal side effects and, especially, sexual dysfunction were much less frequent with moclobemide than with SSRIs. Unlike irreversible MAO-inhibitors, moclobemide has a negligible propensity to induce hypertensive crisis after ingestion of tyramine-rich food ("cheese-reaction"). Therefore, dietary restrictions are not as strict. However, with moclobemide doses above 900 mg/d the risk of interaction with ingested tyramine might become clinically relevant. After multiple dosing the oral bioavailability of moclobemide reaches almost 100%. At therapeutic doses, moclobemide lacks significant negative effects on psychomotor performance, cognitive function or cardiovascular system. Due to the relative freedom from these side effects, moclobemide is particularly attractive in the treatment of elderly patients. Moclobemide is a substrate of CYP2C19. Although it acts as an inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6, relatively few clinically important drug interactions involving moclobemide have been reported. It is relatively safe even in overdose. The drug has a short plasma elimination half-life that allows switching to an alternative agent within 24 h. Since it is well tolerated, therapeutic doses can often be reached rapidly upon onset of treatment. Steady-state plasma levels are reached approximately at one week following dose adjustment. Patients with renal dysfunction require no dose reduction in contrast to patients with severe hepatic impairment. Cases of refractory depression might improve with a combination of moclobemide with other antidepressants, such as clomipramine or a SSRI. Since this combination has rarely been associated with a potentially lethal serotonin syndrome, it requires lower entry doses, a slower dose titration and a more careful monitoring of patients. Combination therapy with moclobemide and other serotonergic agents, or opioids, should be undertaken with caution, although no serious adverse events have been published with therapeutic doses of moclobemide to date. On the basis of animal data the combined use of moclobemide with pethidine or dextropropoxyphene should be avoided. There is no evidence that moclobemide would increase body weight or produce seizures. Some preclinical data suggest that moclobemide may have anticonvulsant property.

Behavioral and biochemical studies of dichloromethane fraction from the Areca catechu nut

The dichloromethane fraction from Areca catechu was found to inhibit monoamine oxidase type A isolated from the rat brain with an IC50 of 665 +/- 65.1 microg/ml. Studies with pharmacological models of depression, i.e., forced swim and tail-suspension tests, indicated that it caused significant reduction in the immobility time similar to that of moclobemide (a selective inhibitor of MAO-A) without causing a significant change in motor performance. Alkaloids such as arecaidine, arecoline, and a few other constituents, reported to be present in Areca catechu were also tested, but none of them were found to inhibit MAO. Present study suggests that the dichloromethane fraction from A. catechu possesses antidepressant property via MAO-A inhibition.

Stress versus depression

1. Exhaustive evidence is quoted showing that uncontrollable (uncoping) stress provoked in experimental mammals leads to depletion of central noradrenergic activity+ adrenomedullary-cortical gland hyperactivity. These physiological disorders cause the typical neuroendocrine peripheral profile: a) raised catecholamines (CA) in plasma [noradrenaline (NA)+adrenaline (Ad)+dopamine (DA), b) reduced NA/Ad ratio in plasma and c) raised plasma cortisol. 2. Exhaustive evidence is quoted which indicates that severely ill humans show peripheral neuroendocrine profile similar to that found in mammals submitted to uncontrollable stress situation. Further, the NA/Ad ratio does not increase but decreases during orthostasis and exercise stress challenges, as well as oral glucose stress (tolerance) test. 3. Exhaustive evidence is quoted which indicates that endogenous depressed subjects show a neuroendocrine profile opposite to that observed in stressed mammals and severely ill humans. This profile consists of central NA (neural sympathetic) hyperactivity+ adrenomedullary glands hyporresponsivity. These disorders are reflected in a three to ten fold increase of the NA/Ad ratio in plasma. 4. Exhaustive evidence is also quoted showing that dysthymic depressed patients show low plasma catecholamines+low NA/Ad plasma ratio (< 2) during supine-resting condition, it is normalized at orthostasis and exercise periods. 5. It is quoted evidence showing that whereas platelet serotonin is increased in dysthymics, the same is reduced in both endogenous depressed and stressed mammals as well as severely ill humans. 6. It is quoted evidence showing that free serotonin in plasma is greatly raised in uncoping stressed mammals and severely ill humans. The same parameter is normal or slightly increased in dysthymic and endogenous depressed humans. These findings are consistent with the increased platelet aggregability observed in "uncontrollable" stressed mammals and in severely ill, but not depressed patients. 7. It is also quoted evidence showing that whereas parasympathetic activity is absent in uncontrollable stressed mammals and severely ill humans, the same is increased in both types of depressed humans. 8. According to the above, the authors postulate the existence of 3 distinct central+ peripheral neuroendocrine profiles for endogenous depression, dysthymic depression and maladaptation to stress syndrome. These different profiles should lead researchers to attempt different therapeutical approach. 9. In view of the fact that the authors found much clinical overlap among the three syndromes (endogenous depression, dysthymic depression and severely ill patients), they believe that a differential diagnosis should be based on neurochemical, neuroendocrine, physiologic, metabolic and neuropharmacological grounds. 10. The experimentally induced uncontrollable stress (behavioral despair) syndrome in mammals should not be used as a valid model of human depressive syndrome.

Moclobemide versus clomipramine in nonmelancholic, nonpsychotic major depression. A Study group

The efficacy and the safety of moclobemide (400-600 mg/day), a reversible and selective inhibitor of monoamine oxidase-A (RIMA) and of clomipramine (100-150 mg/day) were compared respectively in 98 and 93 nonmelancholic, nonpsychotic out-patients with a DSM-III major depressive episode over 6 weeks and up to 3 months, in a multi-center double-blind trial. No statistically significant difference between the treatments was found on the number of responders, at 6 weeks and 3 months, to the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), which was the main criterion for efficacy. The sample size was sufficient to detect a difference of approximatively 20% in response rates. Reduction of the total scores on HDRS and Covi anxiety scale was comparable for both treatments, but the reduction on the Retardation Depressive Scale (RDS) was significantly higher with moclobemide at the 1- and 2-week assessments. According to the RDS as well as the global impression of both patient and physician, a somewhat earlier onset of antidepressant action was evident in the moclobemide group. Tolerance was significantly better in the moclobemide group, mainly due to a lower frequency of weight gain, sedation and anticholinergic effects.

Clinical efficacy of reversible and selective inhibitors of monoamine oxidase A in major depression

This article reviews efficacy studies of the reversible selective inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) moclobemide, which has now received extensive evaluation. Placebo-controlled trials have shown it clearly to be effective. In comparisons with tricyclic and similar antidepressants and with serotonin reuptake inhibitors, it has been found of equal efficacy to these standard drugs. Because of previous suggestions that older MAO inhibitors are particularly effective in depressions characterized as atypical, the effects in subtypes are of particular interest. The evidence indicates that moclobemide is effective in typical severe depression with melancholia rather than being limited to less typical subtypes.

Effects of two different reversible monoamine oxidase-A inhibitors on nociceptive thresholds in the rat

The acute effect of two different reversible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase-A on nociceptive thresholds was evaluated in the rat by the tail-flick and hot-plate tests. CGP 11305-A, a monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor that also blocks serotonin reuptake, elicited an increase of latency in the tail-flick and the hot-plate test. Ineffective doses of CGP 11305-A increased nociceptive thresholds when administered in combination with other serotoninergic agents, i.e. chlorimipramine or 5-hydroxytryptophan, at doses that were ineffective alone. CGP 22364-A, a pure inhibitor of monoamine oxidase-A, increased latency only in the hot-plate test. Both compounds decreased spontaneous locomotor activity at the doses effective in the hot-plate test, suggesting that the responses observed in this test are not related to a pure effect on nociceptive thresholds. The data suggest that the increase in serotonin availability induced by monoamine oxidase-A inhibition alone is not sufficient to affect nociceptive thresholds.

The new generation of monoamine oxidase inhibitors

Irreversible and unspecific inhibitors of MAO were the first modern antidepressants, but after an initial success they fell into discredit due to adverse side effects. In the past two decades interest in MAO inhibitors has been renewed because of progress in basic research, a milestone being the finding that there are two subtypes of MAO, MAO-A and MAO-B. These are distinct proteins with high amino acid homology, coded by separate genes both located on the short arm of the human chromosome X. The enzyme subforms show different substrate specificities in vitro and different distributions within the central nervous system and in peripheral organs. In the central nervous system of man MAO-A seems to be mainly involved in the metabolism of 5 HT and noradrenaline, whereas 2-phenylethylamine and probably dopamine are predominantly deaminated by MAO-B. In the intestinal tract tyramine is mainly metabolized by MAO-A. These characteristics indicate distinct physiological functions of the two MAO-subforms. Several irreversible and reversible non-hydrazine inhibitors with relative selectivities for one of the MAO-subforms have been developed. They belong to various chemical classes with different modes of enzyme inhibition. These range from covalent mechanism based interaction (e.g. by propargyl- and allylamine derivatives) to pseudosubstrate inhibition (e.g. by 2-aminoethyl-carboxamides) and non-covalent interaction (e.g. by brofaromine, toloxatone and possibly moclobemide). The most important pharmacological effects of the new types of MAO inhibitors are those observed in neuropsychiatric disorders. The inhibitors of MAO-A show a favorable action in various forms of mental depression. The drugs seem to have about the same activity as other types of antidepressants, including tricyclic and related compounds as well as classical MAO inhibitors. The onset of action of the MAO-A inhibitors is claimed to be relatively fast. Other possible indications of these drugs include disorders with cognitive impairment, e.g. dementia of the Alzheimer type. In subjects with Parkinson's disease the MAO-B inhibitor L-deprenyl exerts a L-dopa-sparing effect, prolongs L-dopa action and seems to have a favorable influence regarding on-off disabilities. The action is in general transitory (months to several years). In addition L-deprenyl has been shown to delay the necessity for L-dopa treatment in patients with early parkinsonism. Whether the drug influence the progression of the disease is still a matter of debate. L-deprenyl also appears to have some antidepressant effect (especially in higher doses) and to exert a beneficial influence in other disorders, e.g. dementia of the Alzheimer type.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)