A comparative study of fluoxetine, moclobemide, and tianeptine in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder following an earthquake

Purpose

Although antidepressant drugs have been proven as an effective treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), there are few comparative studies of antidepressants that are acting on different neurotransmitters. The main aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of different class of antidepressant drugs on the PTSD.

Subjects/materials and methods. –

In this open label study, the patients who met DSM-IV criteria for PTSD were randomly assigned to flexible doses of fluoxetine, moclobemide, or tianeptine. After the first assessment, consecutive assessments were performed at the end of weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 using clinician administered PTSD scale (CAPS) and Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S). Changes in the total score of CAPS and sub-scale scores of symptom clusters (re-experience, avoidance, and hyperarousal) were the main output of efficacy. All statistics were based on intention-to-treat and last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) principles.

Results.

Thirty-eight patients were assigned to fluoxetine, 35 patients were assigned to moclobemide, and 30 patients were assigned to tianeptine group. Gender distributions and mean ages of the treatment groups were not significantly different. Drop-out rates due to an adverse events or unknown reasons were not significantly different among fluoxetine (18.4%), moclobemide (14.3%), and tianeptine (20.0%) groups. All three treatments has led to a significant improvement in PTSD severity assessed with CAPS total score (ANOVA P < 0.001). Similarly, total scores of re-experiencing, avoidance, and hyperarousal clusters that are subscales of CAPS were significantly reduced by all three treatments (with ANOVA all P values < 0.001). There was not significant difference in terms of treatment effect between three groups.

Discussion. –

Treatment groups showed very similar improvement on all ratings scales. The findings support that fluoxetine, moclobemide, and tianeptine are all effective in the treatment of PTSD. Different mechanisms of action for these antidepressant drugs might result in the same common neurochemical end point. However, further studies using different classes of antidepressant drugs are needed.

Serotonin toxicity caused by moclobemide too soon after paroxetine-selegiline

Serotonin toxicity is an iatrogenic complication of serotonergic drug therapy. It is due to an overstimulation of central and peripheral serotonin receptors that lead to neuromuscular, mental and autonomic changes. Moclobemide is a reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase (MAO)-A, selegiline is an irreversible selective inhibitor of MAO-B, and paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Combined use of these agents is known to cause serotonin toxicity. A 53-year-old woman had been treated with paroxetine and selegiline. After moclobemide was prescribed in place of paroxetine without a washout period, she quickly developed confusion, agitation, ataxia, diaphoresis, tremor, mydriasis, ocular clonus, hyperreflexia, tachycardia, moderately elevated blood pressure and high fever, symptoms that were consistent with serotonin toxicity. Discontinuation of the drugs, hydration and supportive care were followed by remarkable improvement of baseline status within 3 days. This case demonstrates that serotonin toxicity may occur even with small doses of paroxetine, selegiline and moclobemide in combination. Physicians managing patients with depression must be aware of the potential for serotonin toxicity and should be able to recognize and treat or, ideally, anticipate and avoid this pharmacodynamically-mediated interaction that may occur between prescribed drugs.

Das Serotoninsyndrom

The serotonin syndrome is caused by a drug-induced increase of the intrasynaptic serotonin concentration. Milder forms of the syndrome may be difficult to diagnose because of the variability of symptoms. Severe forms often rapidly turn into a life-threatening situation, therefore the serotonin syndrome may be a challenge for physicians. We describe the pathophysiology and therapeutic options of the serotonin syndrome and report about a 42-year-old female patient who ingested large amounts of moclobemide, a monoamine oxidase inhibitor, and citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, for attempted suicide. Within a few hours the patient developed a lethal serotonin syndrome although ICU therapy was initiated immediately.

A metaanalysis of clinical trials comparing moclobemide with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE

To compare response rates among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) treated with either moclobemide, an antidepressant thought to simultaneously enhance both noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission, or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).

METHODS

Using a random-effects model, we combined 12 trials involving 1207 outpatients with MDD.

RESULTS

Patients treated with moclobemide were as likely to experience clinical response as those treated with SSRIs (risk ratio 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.26; P = 0.314). Simply pooling response rates for the 2 agents resulted in a 62.1% response rate for moclobemide and a 57.5% response rate for the SSRIs. A metaregression did not reveal a statistically significant relation between the mean moclobemide dosage for each study and the risk ratio for response rates. Further, we found no difference between the 2 treatments in overall discontinuation rates, discontinuation rates due to adverse events, or discontinuation rates due to lack of efficacy. Also, rates of fatigue or somnolence and of insomnia were similar between the 2 treatment groups. However, SSRI treatment was associated with higher rates of nausea, headaches, and treatment-emergent anxiety than was treatment with moclobemide.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that moclobemide and the SSRIs do differ with respect to their side effect profiles but not in their overall efficacy in the treatment of MDD.

Pseudohallucinations Associated with Moclobemide

The goal of the multicenter drug surveillance project AMSP ("Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie") is the monitoring, assessment and analysis of adverse drug reactions (ADR) of psychopharmalogical drugs. We report about a 23 year-old patient with a depressive episode. He developed severe pseudohallucinations under a treatment with moclobemide. The symptoms occur 6 days after starting the medication and decline within two days after stopping moclobemide. The term "pseudohallucinations" is discussed controversially but still of high interest.

Orthostatic side effects of clomipramine and moclobemide during treatment for depression

From a clinical point of view, orthostatic hypotension is a significant side effect during antidepressant treatment, particularly in the case of tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). This prospective, randomized clinical trial evaluated the effects of clomipramine and moclobemide on orthostatic blood pressure during treatment for depression. One hundred and fifteen depressed inpatients, age up to 70 years, were randomized to treatment with either moclobemide (400 mg/day) or clomipramine (150 mg/day) after 1 week of placebo treatment. Orthostatic blood pressure was measured weekly over the 6-week study period. Clomipramine, but not moclobemide, caused a statistically significant fall in systolic (F = 9.37, P = 0.0037) and diastolic orthostatic blood pressure (F = 3.74, P = 0.0017). In the clomipramine-treated group of patients, we found no correlation between subjective complaints of orthostatic dizziness and the size of systolic orthostatic blood pressure. In conclusion, this study indicates that moclobemide does not induce orthostatic side effects, which is a significant problem in treatment with TCAs. However, the choice of antidepressants depends on other factors as well, e.g. the therapeutic efficacy.

[Biological treatment of depression in the elderly]

Depression has a high prevalence and a poor outcome in the aged. However, it is often under diagnosed and under treated although treatment with antidepressants at optimal dose and duration can be effective on full remission. Numerous antidepressants are effective but most of them produce side effects. The choice of antidepressants must take into account the effect of age on side-effects and pharmacokinetics. IRSS or moclobemide are recommended as first-choice antidepressants because of a presumed side effect better profile. A dimensional approach based on neurobiological hypothesis of depression, specific clinical features of late life depression (e.g. psychomotor retardation) and biological target of the antidepressants should promote treatment efficacy.

Antidepressant-related erectile dysfunction: management via avoidance, switching antidepressants, antidotes, and adaptation

The ideal antidepressant would control depression with no adverse effect on sexual function. Erectile dysfunction and other sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressant medication treatment are problems with many antidepressants and can lead to patient dissatisfaction and decreased compliance with treatment. A computerized MEDLINE search (English language, 1966-2003) was performed using the terms antidepressive agents, erectile dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction. Emphasis was placed on studies with specific sexual function measurements taken before and after treatment and placebo control. Mixed mediator, nonserotonergic antidepressants that block postsynaptic serotonin type 2 receptors (nefazodone, mirtazapine) or that primarily increase dopamine or norepinephrine levels (bupropion) were thought to be good choices for avoiding antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction or for switching patients in whom antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction emerged. Comparisons with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) have revealed less desire and orgasm dysfunction with nonserotonergic bupropion, less orgasm dysfunction with nefazodone, and superior overall satisfaction with sexual functioning with bupropion or nefazodone. However, most of these studies have design flaws that make evidence-based claims of efficacy difficult to substantiate. Agents proposed for antidote use in antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction have either not been studied in men or not proved efficacious in randomized placebo-controlled trials. Switching to and augmentation with bupropion or nefazodone have also not clearly shown efficacy in controlled trials and require care and monitoring to avoid SRI discontinuation symptoms and loss of antidepressant efficacy. Few proposed treatment options, apart from avoidance, have proved effective for antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction, which can have negative consequences on depression management.

Moclobemide: therapeutic use and clinical studies

Moclobemide is a reversible inhibitor of monoamine-oxidase-A (RIMA) and has been extensively evaluated in the treatment of a wide spectrum of depressive disorders and less extensively studied in anxiety disorders. Nearly all meta-analyses and most comparative studies indicated that in the acute management of depression this drug is more efficacious than placebo and as efficacious as tricyclic (or some heterocyclic) antidepressants or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). There is a growing evidence that moclobemide is not inferior to other antidepressants in the treatment of subtypes of depression, such as dysthymia, endogenous (unipolar and bipolar), reactive, atypical, agitated, and retarded depression as with other antidepressants limited evidence suggests that moclobemide has consistent long-term efficacy. However, more controlled studies addressing this issue are needed. For patients with bipolar depression the risk of developing mania seems to be not higher with moclobemide than with other antidepressants. The effective therapeutic dose range for moclobemide in most acute phase trials was 300 to 600 mg, divided in 2 to 3 doses. While one controlled trial and one long-term open-label study found moclobemide to be efficacious in social phobia, three controlled trials subsequently revealed either no effect or less robust effects with the tendency of higher doses (600 - 900 mg/d) to be more efficacious. Two comparative trials demonstrated moclobemide to be as efficacious as fluoxetine or clomipramine in patients suffering from panic disorder. Placebo-controlled trials in this indication are, however, still lacking. A relationship between the plasma concentration of moclobemide and its therapeutic efficacy is not apparent but a positive correlation with adverse events has been found. Dizziness, nausea and insomnia occurred more frequently on moclobemide than on placebo. Due to negligible anticholinergic and antihistaminic actions, moclobemide has been better tolerated than tri- or heterocyclic antidepressants. Gastrointestinal side effects and, especially, sexual dysfunction were much less frequent with moclobemide than with SSRIs. Unlike irreversible MAO-inhibitors, moclobemide has a negligible propensity to induce hypertensive crisis after ingestion of tyramine-rich food ("cheese-reaction"). Therefore, dietary restrictions are not as strict. However, with moclobemide doses above 900 mg/d the risk of interaction with ingested tyramine might become clinically relevant. After multiple dosing the oral bioavailability of moclobemide reaches almost 100%. At therapeutic doses, moclobemide lacks significant negative effects on psychomotor performance, cognitive function or cardiovascular system. Due to the relative freedom from these side effects, moclobemide is particularly attractive in the treatment of elderly patients. Moclobemide is a substrate of CYP2C19. Although it acts as an inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6, relatively few clinically important drug interactions involving moclobemide have been reported. It is relatively safe even in overdose. The drug has a short plasma elimination half-life that allows switching to an alternative agent within 24 h. Since it is well tolerated, therapeutic doses can often be reached rapidly upon onset of treatment. Steady-state plasma levels are reached approximately at one week following dose adjustment. Patients with renal dysfunction require no dose reduction in contrast to patients with severe hepatic impairment. Cases of refractory depression might improve with a combination of moclobemide with other antidepressants, such as clomipramine or a SSRI. Since this combination has rarely been associated with a potentially lethal serotonin syndrome, it requires lower entry doses, a slower dose titration and a more careful monitoring of patients. Combination therapy with moclobemide and other serotonergic agents, or opioids, should be undertaken with caution, although no serious adverse events have been published with therapeutic doses of moclobemide to date. On the basis of animal data the combined use of moclobemide with pethidine or dextropropoxyphene should be avoided. There is no evidence that moclobemide would increase body weight or produce seizures. Some preclinical data suggest that moclobemide may have anticonvulsant property.

Efficacy of citalopram and moclobemide in patients with social phobia: some preliminary findings

The efficacy of irreversible and reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) in the treatment of social phobia (SP) is well established. Recently, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been used more frequently. In the present study, the efficacy and side-effect profile of citalopram, an SSRI, and moclobemide, the only MAOI used in Turkey, were compared. The 71 patients diagnosed with SP according to DSM-III-R were randomly assigned to two subgroups; citalopram (n = 36) or moclobemide (n = 35). The study was an 8-week, randomized, open-label, rater-blinded, parallel-group trial. All patients were assessed by Hamilton anxiety rating (HAM-A), Liebowitz social anxiety (LSAS), clinical global impression-severity of illness (CGI-SI) and clinical global impression-improvement (CGI-I) scales. There was a similar percentage of responders (citalopram 75%, n = 27 and moclobemide 74.3%, n = 26), with a >50% or greater reduction in LSAS total score and ratings of "very much" or "much improved" on the CGI-I. None of the patients withdrew from the study. The results of the present study suggest that citalopram has shown promising results in patients with SP.

Moclobemide discontinuation syndrome predominantly presenting with influenza-like symptoms

A case of moclobemide discontinuation syndrome who predominantly presented with influenza-like symptoms is presented. Sertraline treatment did not modify the symptoms, which may suggest different mechanisms with regard to different antidepressant drug discontinuation syndromes. Implications for clinical care are reviewed.

Moclobemide is effective and well tolerated in the long-term pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder with or without comorbid anxiety disorder

Social phobia (social anxiety disorder) is a highly prevalent and chronic disorder that is associated with significant comorbidity and disability. Despite recent advances in the pharmacotherapy of the disorder, there is a paucity of randomized controlled trials on patients with comorbid disorders and on maintenance treatment. A randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind multi-site trial of moclobemide, a reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A, was undertaken with 390 subjects. After an initial 12 weeks, there was the option of continuing for an additional 6 months of treatment. The primary efficacy parameter chosen was responder status as defined by the Clinical Global Impression scale change item. From week 4 onwards, there was a significantly higher response rate on moclobemide than on placebo. Superiority of medication over placebo was similar in patients with comorbid anxiety disorders (33% of subjects) and without, as well as in patients with different subtypes of social anxiety disorder; indeed, treatment with moclobemide rather than placebo was the strongest predictor of response. Adverse events were similar across treatment groups, and were typically mild and transient. In the extension phase, response rates remained higher in the moclobemide group, and ratings of tolerability were equally high in both groups. Thus, in a large sample of social anxiety disorder patients with and without comorbid anxiety disorders, moclobemide was both effective and well-tolerated in the short as well as long-term. These data confirm and extend previous findings on the value of moclobemide in the treatment of social anxiety disorder, and strengthen the range of therapeutic options for managing this important disorder.

[Serotonin syndrome--several cases of this often overlooked diagnosis]

During the recent decade an increasing number of inquiries concerning cases of overdoses exhibiting typical signs of the serotonin syndrome have been recorded at the Swedish Poisons Information Centre. Four of these cases are presented together with a review of the literature. All patients had overdosed moclobemide and in one case this was the only drug taken. The other patients had ingested moclobemide together with citalopram (2 cases) and clomipramine (1 case). Moreover, other serotoninergic pharmaceuticals as sertraline and sumatriptan were simultaneously ingested in one case and buspirone in another. Three of the cases had hyperthermia, > 40 degrees C and the same number showed pronounced muscle rigidity, coma and mydriasis. Other severe signs and symptoms upon admission included positive Babinski and trismus in two cases each and seizures in one. All patients received mechanical ventilation. Two were treated with dantrolene sodium and one of them was given cyproheptadine as well. One patient received cyproheptadine treatment alone and another prolonged muscle relaxation. Three patients had a typical short clinical course, whereas one patient developed rhabdomyolysis, DIC and arrhythmias. All patients fully recovered.

Antidepressant side effects in depression patients treated in a naturalistic setting: a study of bupropion, moclobemide, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine

OBJECTIVE

There is no commonly accepted standard for comparing antidepressant-induced side effects. This study evaluates a clinician-administered scale, the Toronto Side Effect Scale (TSES), in a natural practice clinic.

METHOD

We used the TSES to assess side effects in 193 depression patients who completed 8 weeks of treatment with either bupropion, moclobemide, paroxetine, sertraline, or venlafaxine.

RESULTS

Rates of remission (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HRSD] < 7) did not differ across drugs after 8 weeks of treatment. Paired drug comparisons yielded significant differences in 16 of the 32 side effects. We present differences between pairs of the 5 antidepressants in Central Nervous System (CNS), gastrointestinal (GI), and sexual side effects. A measure of side-effect intensity distinguished paroxetine from the other antidepressants on a measure of sexual dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the clinical utility of the TSES as a simple, clinician-administered antidepressant side-effect scale.

Moclobemide vs. imipramine in bipolar depression: a multicentre double-blind clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative efficacy, tolerability and risk of precipitating mania of moclobemide and imipramine in the treatment of bipolar depression.

METHOD

A randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre study of moclobemide (MCB) (450-750 mg daily) and imipramine (IMI) (150-250 mg daily) in 21 centres in nine countries; 156 patients (65 males, 91 females) aged 18-65 with bipolar depression (17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score chi16) participated. Clinical status was assessed using standardized rating scales before treatment and at 1,2,3,4,6 and 8 weeks. The data were analysed on an intention to treat basis with the last observation carried forward.

RESULTS

In the MCB group, the mean HAMD fell from 23.0 to 13.1, in the IMI group it fell from 22.5 to 9.5; the mean score on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) fell from 29.5 to 16.3 on MCB and from 29.2 to 11.6 on IMI. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups on any efficacy measures. Anticholinergic side-effects were three times more common with IMI than MCB and weight gain was also greater on IMI. Two patients (3.7%) on MCB and six patients (11%) on IMI were withdrawn because of manic symptoms, with manic symptoms occurring earlier on IMI, although these differences did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

No differences in efficacy were detected between MCB and IMI in the treatment of bipolar depression. The data suggests that MCB is less likely than IMI to precipitate mania.

Effect of MAO-A inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of almotriptan, an antimigraine agent in humans

AIMS

To assess the effect of a reversible MAO-A inhibitor, moclobemide, on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of almotriptan and assess the clinical consequences of any interaction.

METHODS

Twelve healthy volunteers received the following treatments in a randomized, open-label, two-way crossover design (with a 1 week washout between treatments): (A) one 150 mg moclobemide tablet every 12 h for 8 days and one 12.5 mg almotriptan tablet on the morning of day 8; and (B) one 12.5 mg almotriptan tablet on day 8. Plasma almotriptan was quantified by h.p.l.c.-MS-MS, while urinary concentrations were measured by h.p.l.c.-u.v. Vital signs, ECGs, and adverse events were evaluated after almotriptan administration. Treatment effects on pharmacokinetics and vital signs were assessed by analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Mean almotriptan AUC was higher (483 +/- 99.9 vs 352 +/- 75.4 ng ml-1 h, P = 0.0001) and oral clearance was lower (26.6 +/- 4.00 vs 36.6 +/- 5.89 l h-1, P = 0.0001) when almotriptan was administered with moclobemide. Mean half-life was longer (4.22 +/- 0.78 vs 3.41 +/- 0.45 h, P = 0.0002) after coadministration with moclobemide. Renal clearance of almotriptan was unaffected by moclobemide. No serious adverse events occurred and no clinically significant vital sign changes were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Moclobemide increased plasma concentrations of almotriptan on average by 37%, but the combined administration of these two compounds was well tolerated. The degree of interaction was much less than that seen previously for sumatriptan or zolmitriptan given with moclobemide.

Combined treatment with corticosteroids and moclobemide favors normalization of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomized, double blind trial

Hyperresponsiveness of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in multiple sclerosis (MS), an autoimmune inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, is presumably due to diminished corticosteroid receptor function. It probably influences the immune response, but its clinical significance is not clear. Similar HPA dysregulation occurs in depression and is reversible with successful antidepressant treatment. We conducted a double blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the neuroendocrine effect of cotreatment with the antidepressant moclobemide as an adjunct to oral corticosteroids in MS. Twenty-one patients with definite relapsing-remitting MS (11 females, aged 33.9 +/- 2.0 yr; Expanded Disability Status Scale score of neurological impairment, 2.0--6.5) in acute relapse were treated with placebo (n = 13) or 300 mg moclobemide (reversible monoamine oxidase A inhibitor; n = 8) for 75 days. All received oral fluocortolone from day 7 on, and the dose was tapered until day 29. Effects were evaluated using the combined dexamethasone-CRH test and clinically on days 1, 30, and 75. At baseline, the HPA axis was mildly activated, comparably for treatment groups [area under the curve for cortisol (AUC-Cort), 213.8 +/- 76.8 arbitrary units in the moclobemide group vs. 225.8 +/- 65.1 in the steroid alone group; mean +/- SEM]. In a group of healthy controls with comparable demographic characteristics, the AUC-Cort was 107.4 +/- 14.1. Moclobemide cotreatment resulted in normalization of the HPA axis response, whereas the HPA system hyperresponse was maintained with steroids alone (AUC-Cort on day 30, 85.9 +/- 22.8 vs.177.1 +/- 68.5; on day 75, 111.0 +/- 46.0 vs. 199.2 +/- 64.6). The change in Expanded Disability Status Scale was comparable for both groups. Although corticosteroids alone had no effect on the HPA response using the dexamethasone-CRH test, treatment with moclobemide combined with corticosteroids favors normalization of the HPA response in relapsing-remitting MS.

Moclobemide in pregnancy

We report on the case of female patient with chronic dysthymia, who took moclobemide at 300 mg/day throughout her first pregnancy. The course of pregnancy was healthy, and natural delivery was uneventful. The psychomotoric and somatic development of the child within first 14 months of life has been normal.

Efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide in bulimia nervosa: a placebo-controlled trial

A 6-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial was carried out to examine the efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide, a monoamine oxidase type A selective and reversible inhibitor, in the treatment of bulimia nervosa. Patients were admitted to the study even if they were unable to adhere to a tyramine-free diet. Fifty-two normal-weight women (age range 18-40 years) suffering from bulimia nervosa (DSM-IV criteria) completed the trial. Particular emphasis was placed on evaluating the incidence of hypertension and other side-effects in chronically treated patients. At the usual antidepressant dose of 600 mg, moclobemide was not significantly superior to placebo in the reducing the weekly number of binge eating episodes or in improving several measures of eating attitudes and behaviour (BITE, EDI, TFEQ) in normal-weight bulimia nervosa. The dropout rate was relatively low (29%), and the side-effects were limited and equally distributed between the two treatment groups. No patient experienced a hypertensive crisis during the study and no serious side-effect was detected. The study indicates that moclobemide 600 mg pro die is not efficacious in bulimia nervosa, but it can be safely administered, even to young subjects, at a very high risk of consuming large amounts of tyramine-rich foods without dietary restrictions.

Comparison of moclobemide with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on sexual function in depressed adults. The Australian and German Study Groups

OBJECTIVE

To compare the emergent sexual effects of moclobemide and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during acute and maintenance therapy in routine practice.

METHOD

268 patients were evaluated for sexual function at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months of treatment using physician ratings and self-rating questionnaires. Patients received moclobemide, an reversible monoamine oxidase A inhibitor (RIMA), or a SSRI (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline).

RESULTS

Baseline values were similar in all groups. Incidences of impairments of sexual functioning with treatment, whether clinically relevant or not, were 24.3% with moclobemide and 61.5% with SSRIs (physician ratings), with no significant tolerance to these effects. There was a suggestion of differences between the SSRIs in their specific dysfunctions they cause. SSRIs (21.6% of patients) had about ten times the moclobemide rate (1.9%) of sexual dysfunction reported as adverse events. Antidepressant efficacy was comparable between treatments.

CONCLUSION

In patients for whom sexual function is important or sexual dysfunction is present, moclobemide should be considered a first line antidepressant.

Effects of antidepressant treatments on polymorphonuclear elastase levels in patients with depression

BACKGROUND

We have previously reported that severe depression is associated with immunological and inflammatory alterations and these alterations may be showed easily by polymorphonuclear elastase (PMNE) measurements. The purpose of the present study is to show how PMN elastase levels change before and after antidepressant treatment.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with depression (40 with major depression [MD], 15 with dysthymic disorder [DD]) were included in the study. Blood samples were drawn prior to drug treatment, and 3 months after the treatment. Severity of depression was measured by 24-item Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS).

RESULTS

There was a positive correlation between Delta PMNE levels and Delta HDRS in patients with MD, but not in patients with DD. Twenty-eight patients were given moclobemide, and 27 patients were given imipramine. It was seen that PMN elastase levels were significantly reduced after 3-month antidepressant treatment period only in patients with MD.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that PMNE activity is a state dependent parameter and improvement of depressive symptoms due to antidepressant treatment may lead to decrement of PMNE levels. CLINICAL IMPLICATION AND LIMITATIONS: PMN elastase measurements may be used as a sensitive biological marker to follow the time-course of the disease activity in patients with major depression.

Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction during treatment with moclobemide, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine

BACKGROUND

Recent reports suggest that adverse effects on sexual function occur in up to 50% of patients who are treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants. Previously cited low rates were more likely a function of underreporting than underoccurrence. There is less evidence about rates of dysfunction with serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) and reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A (RIMA) antidepressants. The purpose of this report is to evaluate disturbances in sexual drive/desire and arousal/orgasm in 107 patients who met criteria for major depressive disorder and received treatment with either moclobemide, paroxetine, sertraline, or venlafaxine.

METHOD

All consenting eligible patients who met DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder completed the Sexual Functioning Questionnaire, version 1 (SFQ) and were assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) prior to and after 8 or 14 weeks of antidepressant therapy. Analyses were carried out to examine the effect of gender, drug type, pretreatment level of sexual dysfunction, and drug response on reported sexual dysfunction.

RESULTS

Compared with women, men experienced a significantly greater level of drug-related impairment in drive/desire (p < .05), whereas there were no statistically significant differences in levels of arousal/orgasm impairment between men and women. The reported impairment in drive/desire items for men ranged from 38% to 50% and from 26% to 32% for women. No differences were found across the 4 antidepressants in men, whereas in women, rates of dysfunction were generally higher with sertraline and paroxetine, but only significantly so in comparison with moclobemide on some measures (p < .03). Rates of sexual dysfunction with venlafaxine tended to fall between those of SSRIs and the RIMA agent. An unexpected relationship was found between favorable drug response and a decreased level of drug-induced sexual dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction occurs in approximately 30% to 70% of patients who are treated with sertraline or paroxetine. Lower rates are reported with moclobemide and venlafaxine. Clinicians should evaluate the various aspects of sexual dysfunction before and during antidepressant therapy.

[Serotonin syndrome during fluoxetine poisoning in a patient taking moclobemide]

PURPOSE

To present a case of delayed serotonin syndome (SS), a less well-known adverse effect of fluoxetine intoxication.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 21-yr-old woman was admitted following voluntary intoxication with fluoxetine and benzodiazepines. At the time of admission, she was slightly drowsy and hypotonic but, eight hours later, she developed severe hypertonic coma despite blood concentrations of fluoxetine within the therapeutic range. Repeated toxicological analyses revealed the presence of moclobemide at non-measurable concentrations, suggesting earlier ingestion of this monoamine oxydase inhibitor. Having excluded all other likely causes of the neurological syndrome observed, a SS was postulated. Treatment was symptomatic with mechanical ventilation, sedation with thiopental and fentanyl, and neuromuscular block with pancuronium bromide. The patient recovered spontaneously 20 hr later.

CONCLUSION

Physicians managing patients presenting with fluoxetine intoxication must be aware of the potential risk of SS. Treatment is symptomatic, but SS may be severe and require vital support in the intensive care environment. Review of published reports does not allow the authors to recommend a specific anesthetic management.

Gastric decontamination performed 5 min after the ingestion of temazepam, verapamil and moclobemide: charcoal is superior to lavage

AIMS

The aim was to study the efficacy of gastric lavage and activated charcoal in preventing the absorption of temazepam, verapamil and moclobemide when gastric decontamination was performed immediately after ingestion of the drugs.

METHODS

Nine healthy volunteers took part in a randomized cross-over study with three phases. The subjects were administered single oral doses of 10 mg temazepam, 80 mg verapamil and 150 mg moclobemide. Five minutes later, they were assigned to one of the following treatments: 200 ml water (control), 25 g activated charcoal as a suspension in 200 ml water or gastric lavage. Plasma concentrations and the cumulative excretion into urine of the three drugs were determined up to 24 h.

RESULTS

The mean AUC(0,24 h) of temazepam, verapamil and moclobemide was reduced by 95.2% (P < 0.01), 92.8% (P < 0.01) and 99. 7% (P < 0.01), respectively, by activated charcoal compared with control. Gastric lavage did not reduce significantly the AUC(0,24 h) of these drugs. The 24 h cumulative excretion of temazepam, verapamil and moclobemide into urine was reduced significantly (P < 0.05) by charcoal but not by gastric lavage. Charcoal reduced the AUC(0,24 h), Cmax and urinary excretion of all three drugs significantly more than lavage.

CONCLUSIONS

Activated charcoal is very effective and gastric lavage can be rather ineffective in preventing the absorption of temazepam, verapamil and moclobemide when the treatment is given very rapidly after ingestion of the drugs, before tablet disintegration has occurred.

An open study of sertraline in patients with major depression who failed to respond to moclobemide

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sertraline in patients with major depression who have failed to respond to an adequate trial of moclobemide.

METHOD

Sixty-three patients with major depression who had discontinued moclobemide within the last 6 weeks due to lack of efficacy were recruited from multiple psychiatric services in Victoria and Queensland. After a wash-out period, patients were treated with sertraline 50 mg once daily for 4 weeks. If there was an insufficient response, the dose was titrated upwards to a maximum of 200 mg/day, with 2 weeks at each dosage level. By the end of the study, patients had received a fixed dose of sertraline for 8 weeks. The main outcome measures were the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scales. Secondary outcome measures included the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).

RESULTS

Of the 62 intention-to-treat patients enrolled, 48 (77%) responded to sertraline (i.e. experienced > or =50% reduction in HAMD total score from baseline and had a final HAMD score of < or =17). Fifty-four (87%) patients were at least 'minimally improved' on the CGI scale. There were also significant improvements in mean total MADRS and BDI scores. Sertraline was well tolerated. Adverse events were reported by 84% of patients, but only 5% withdrew due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that patients with major depression who have failed to respond to moclobemide can generally be treated successfully with sertraline.

A 12-week study comparing moclobemide and sertraline in the treatment of outpatients with atypical depression

One hundred and ninety-seven outpatients with atypical depression [Atypical Depression Diagnostic Scale (ADDS) score=4] were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with sertraline or moclobemide in a multicentre, parallel-group clinical trial. Patients were started on either 50 mg/day sertraline or 300 mg/day moclobemide. If the therapeutic response was not satisfactory after 4 weeks, the dose could be increased to either 100 mg/day sertraline or 450 mg/day moclobemide. Primary efficacy evaluations were the 29-item Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) response rate (much or very much improved) at study endpoint. Secondary efficacy evaluations included the ADDS, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), the Leeds Sleep Scale, and the Battelle Quality of Life Battery (BQOLB). In the analysis of the 172 patient efficacy-evaluable population, there was significant baseline to endpoint improvement in all primary and secondary efficacy assessments after treatment with either sertraline or moclobemide. At the endpoint, the proportion of responders on CGI-I, was 77.5% in the sertraline group and 67.5% in the moclobemide group (p=0.052). The baseline to endpoint mean 29-item HAM-D score decreased from 35.9 to 14.5 in the sertraline group and from 36.3 to 16.1 in the moclobemide group. Sertraline also resulted in a significantly (p < 0.05) greater degree of improvement at the endpoint, compared with moclobemide, in the proportion of remitters on the HAMA (total score < or = 7), ADDS Category IID (Rejection Sensitivity), Leeds Sleep Factor 4 (Integrity of Behaviour Following Awakening), and on three dimensions of the BQOLB (Energy/Vitality, Social Interaction and Life Satisfaction). There were no other significant differences between treatment groups. Overall, both medications were well tolerated. In this study, both sertraline and moclobemide improved the symptoms of atypical depression.

Newer antidepressants: a comparison of tolerability in general practice

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of antidepressants have been released on the United Kingdom market in recent years, and these are being prescribed more frequently in general practice. Clinical trials suggest that such agents have similar efficacy and the choice of drug is probably based on tolerability, toxicity in overdose, and cost.

AIM

To compare the tolerability and safety profile of six, newly marketed antidepressants used in general practice.

METHOD

Studies have been conducted for six antidepressants: fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, moclobemide, venlafaxine, and nefazodone, using the technique of prescription-event monitoring. Patients were identified using incident dispensed prescription data. Questionnaires were sent to patients' general practitioners six months after the date of first prescription. Questionnaires asked for date of birth, sex, indication for prescribing each drug, and all events entered in the patients' records after the date of first prescription.

RESULTS

Each cohort exceeded 10,000 patients. Nausea/vomiting was the most frequently reported event for all drugs. The difference in incidence rates for drowsiness/sedation, male sexual dysfunction, and hypertension is shown. Mortality data are also reported.

CONCLUSION

Frequently reported events were similar for all six drugs but there were clinically and statistically significant differences for less frequently reported events. The adjusted mortality rate was identical between the six drugs. This study provides valuable comparative data for six, widely used antidepressants in general practice.

Moclobemide treatment in multiple sclerosis patients with comorbid depression: an open-label safety trial

Depression is common in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, but tricyclic compounds are not well tolerated and newer antidepressants have not been studied. Effects of 150-400 mg/day of moclobemide, a reversible monoamine oxidase A inhibitor, were studied in a 3-month open design in 10 MS patient with DSM-IV-diagnosed depression. Nine patients reached complete remission. No adverse effects were noted. Four patients reported side effects including nausea and insomnia. The authors conclude that moclobemide is a well tolerated and efficient treatment for depression comorbid with MS.