Risperidone as add-on therapy in behavioural disturbances in mental retardation: a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study

Etiology and Management of Behavioral Disorder in Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Intellectual disability (ID) encompasses a wide variety of disorders that can severely affect an individual’s cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development, even when identified early in life. Initially, individuals with such disorders had shorter life expectancies. However, medical advances have increased the life expectancy of individuals with ID similar to that of the general population. More attention must be paid to manage diseases affecting the intellectually disabled elderly, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic constipation, and behavioral disorders.

Prevalence and patterns of antipsychotic use and their associations with mental health and problem behaviours among older adults with intellectual disabilities

BACKGROUND

There are concerns that antipsychotics may be used inappropriately in adults with intellectual disability for problem behaviours in the absence of a diagnosed mental health condition. The aim was to examine the prevalence and patterns of antipsychotic use and their association with problem behaviours and mental health conditions in older adults with intellectual disability.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data were drawn from Wave 2 (2013/2014) of the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IDS-TILDA). Medication data were available for 95.6% (n = 677). Those who reported antipsychotic use and reported psychotic or other mental health conditions and those who reported problem behaviours were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 45.1% (n = 305) had antipsychotics, and of those with antipsychotic use and diagnosis information (n = 282), 25.9% (73) had a psychotic disorder. 58% of those exposed to antipsychotics reported problem behaviours.

CONCLUSION

Reported use of antipsychotics significantly exceeded reported doctor's diagnosis of psychotic conditions in this study.

Real-world effectiveness of clozapine for intellectual disability: Results from a mirror-image and a reverse-mirror-image study

BACKGROUND

Comorbid mental illness is common in patients with intellectual disability. Antipsychotics are widely used for these conditions, but the effect of clozapine remains largely unknown.

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of clozapine on naturalistic outcomes in patients with intellectual disability.

METHODS

By combining the national health registers, we identified all patients in Denmark with intellectual disability initiating clozapine treatment during the period 1996-2012. We used a mirror-image model to test whether initiation of clozapine treatment was associated with reduction in psychiatric admissions and inpatient days, reduction in the number of individuals performing intentional self-harm or overdose, and less frequent use of concomitant psychopharmacological treatment. Similar outcome measures were used in a reverse mirror-image model to investigate the effects of clozapine termination.

RESULTS

A total of 405 patients with intellectual disability redeemed clozapine. After initiation of clozapine the number of psychiatric admissions were reduced by 0.65 admissions (95% CI: 0.31-1.00) and the inpatient days were reduced by 67.2 days (95% CI: 51.2-83.3), with a similar decrease for patients with intellectual disability without psychiatric comorbidity. Clozapine treatment was not found to reduce the number of individuals with intentional self-harm, incidents of overdose, or the use of concomitant psychotropics. In cases where clozapine treatment was terminated, the number of psychiatric admissions increased by 0.57 admissions (95% CI: 0.01-1.12).

CONCLUSION

This nationwide study, which is the largest to date, suggests that treatment with clozapine is associated with a reduction in psychiatric admissions and inpatient days in patients with intellectual disability. Further studies evaluating the effects of clozapine in patients with intellectual disability are warranted.

Psychopharmacology and people with learning disability

“These medications (antipsychotic drugs) were originally developed to treat not the mentally handicapped but the mentally ill; those, for example, with schizophrenia, paranoia and other specific conditions, but now the far wider use of these drugs has been challenged because there is evidence that they can produce serious side-effects in addition to the distress already suffered. Future changes in the use of antipsychotic drugs in the UK may come from the Royal College of Psychiatrists or from action in the Law Courts” (Public Eye, BBC2, 1.5.92).

Pharmacotherapy for mental health problems in people with intellectual disability

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Psychotropic medications are commonly prescribed to people with intellectual disability. We reviewed current evidence-based pharmacotherapy options and recent updates to guide clinicians in their medication management plans.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antipsychotics, particularly risperidone, appear to be effective in reducing problem behaviors in children with intellectual disability. Evidence in adults is inconclusive. Methylphenidate appears to be effective, and α-agonists appear promising in reducing attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms. Lithium might be effective in reducing aggression. Evidence is limited to support the use of antiepileptic drugs, anxiolytics, and naltrexone for management of problem behaviors. Antidepressants may be poorly tolerated and might not be effective in reducing repetitive/stereotypic behaviors.In recent trials, glutamatergic and GABAergic agents for fragile X syndrome, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for Down's syndrome, failed to show efficacy. Growth hormone treatment might improve cognition and behavior in Prader-Willi syndrome population. Results from oxytocin trials on social behaviors are inconclusive albeit promising. Melatonin appears to improve sleep. Most trials of dietary supplements did not show benefits.

SUMMARY

Evidence-based pharmacotherapy options in people with intellectual disability are limited, and many agents can cause substantial adverse events. For this reason, clinicians should consider pharmacotherapy as only a part of comprehensive treatment, and regularly assess drug effects, adverse events, and the feasibility of decreasing dose or withdrawing medications.

Risperidone therapy in the control of behavioural disturbances in patients with learning disability

Objective: The objective of this audit to examine the effect of risperidone therapy in controlling some behavioural disturbances in people with learning disability.

Method: Retrospective analysis of various behavioural disturbances before and after beginning risperidone therapy (during the month before risperidone was started in each case, and during September 1994 in all cases).

Results: Risperidone was found to be effective in controlling various behaviour problems in 12 of 17 patients.

Conclusion: Risperidone may selectively influence behaviour problems secondary to possible underlying mental illness but not others. There was also some evidence that it was more effective in an average dose of 6-8mg/day, but was not beneficial in doses smaller or larger than this dose range.

Bright light therapy in Parkinson's disease: an overview of the background and evidence

Sleep disorders are common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and seem to be strongly associated with depression. It has been suggested that sleep disorders as well as depression are caused by a disturbed circadian rhythm. Indeed, PD patients are prone to misalignment of their circadian rhythm due to various factors, and many patients with PD display a phase advance of their circadian rhythm. Current treatment options for sleep disorders and depression in patients with PD are limited and can have serious side effects; alternative treatments are therefore badly needed. Bright light therapy (BLT) restores circadian rhythmicity effectively in mood- and sleep-disturbed patients without PD. The few studies that focused on the efficacy of BLT in patients with PD demonstrated a positive effect of BLT not only on sleep and mood but also on motor function. More research on the neurobiology and efficacy of BLT in PD is warranted.

Efficacy of atypical antipsychotic medication in the management of behaviour problems in children with intellectual disabilities and borderline intelligence: a systematic review

The use of medications to manage problem behaviours is widespread. However, robust evidence to support their use seems to be lacking. The aim was to review research evidence into the efficacy of atypical antipsychotic medication in managing problem behaviour in children with intellectual disabilities and borderline intelligence. A systematic review was conducted for placebo-controlled randomised double-blind trials. The included studies (N = 6) showed that risperidone was significantly more effective than placebo in managing problem behaviours. However, most studies highlighted adverse events primarily somnolence and weight gain. There is now some evidence in favour of the use of risperidone. However, because of possible adverse events, these medications have to be used with caution.

Representation of people with intellectual disabilities in randomised controlled trials on antipsychotic treatment for behavioural problems

BACKGROUND

Behavioural problems are common in people with intellectual disability (ID) and are often treated with antipsychotics.

AIM

To establish the frequency and characteristics of people with ID included in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on antipsychotic treatment for behavioural problems, and to investigate the quality of these RCTs.

METHODS

A literature search in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane was performed and reviewed.

RESULTS

People with ID participated in 27 of the 100 included RCTs. The RCTs were of good quality but smaller compared with trials in patients with dementia or schizophrenia (average sample sizes = 55, 124 and 374). In 13/27 trials no clear definition of ID was given. Over 25 different outcome measures were used to assess behavioural problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies in which people with ID are included are of a sufficient quality, but of a small size. The heterogeneity in the characteristics of the ID population included as well as in the applied assessment instruments makes performing meta-analyses unfeasible.

Aggressive behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: defining the role of drug treatment

A complex form of aggression, commonly expanded as 'aggressive challenging behaviour', is reported in one in four adults with intellectual disability and is often treated with antipsychotics, mood stabilizers and antidepressants. Psychological treatments, including anger and behavioural management, person-centred planning and manipulation of the environment (nidotherapy), have also been used when available but to a lesser extent. In this article, the evidence for efficacy for each intervention is examined, with data from randomized controlled trials given primacy. Very little evidence, based on limited data, can be found for the interventions of anger and behavioural management and also for the atypical antipsychotic drug, risperidone; the data available on these interventions come primarily from studies conducted in children in whom the behaviour is part of the autistic spectrum. Antipsychotic drugs, particularly the atypical group, have been the most commonly used interventions in recent years, but a recent independent randomized trial showed no benefits for either risperidone or haloperidol compared with placebo, with some evidence of a better response to placebo than either active drug in the reduction of aggression. In the light of this uncertainty, the clinician must return to the task of collecting a careful history and mental state examination, including awareness of the setting in which the behaviour is shown, which will help with diagnosis and appropriate intervention. The choice of intervention should not be a casual one and is not likely to be chosen well if the clinician relies only on standard guidelines. The paucity of randomized trial evidence is preventing progress in the treatment of persistent aggressive behaviour. On present evidence, the use of drug treatment should be much more sparing and reserved for those patients who are putting themselves and others at particular risk as a consequence of their behaviour; such treatment should be regarded as temporary and as adjunctive to other forms of management. There is an urgent need for larger, randomized studies of psychological interventions, which at present appear to have a higher benefit-risk ratio than drug treatment but that also have a poor evidence base. More care should be taken to avoid the term 'aggressive challenging behaviour' being used as a portmanteau diagnostic pseudonym when it merely represents a diverse oppositional repertoire of many aetiologies.

Psychotropic medication use for challenging behaviors in persons with intellectual disabilities: an overview

Challenging behaviors in persons with intellectual disabilities are primary target for treatment in mental health clinics and institutions. Furthermore, an increasing number of people are receiving psychotropic medications for the management of their challenging behaviors. Many people are often treated with high doses of multiple psychotropic medications for extended periods of time with little or no data collected to determine treatment efficacy. Similarly, data demonstrating treatment effectiveness is at best questionable at this time. It is for these reasons that controversy exists regarding the use of psychotropic medication for challenging behaviors. The purpose of this paper was to summarize past and current studies of drug related interventions for challenging behaviors for persons with intellectual disabilities. Based on the results of this review, the effectiveness of psychotropic medications in managing challenging behaviors is best described as minimal and a need exists for controlled studies of higher scientific quality in this area. Considering alternative psychologically based interventions and careful functional assessments appear to be advisable.

Risperidone for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in people with intellectual disabilities

BACKGROUND

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is increasingly recognised as occurring in people with intellectual disability (ID), although treatment of ADHD in this population has not ben tested widely. Risperidone has been used to treat ADHD in people with ID, although the evidence for its effectiveness is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effectiveness of risperidone for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in people with intellectual disabilities.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In February 2009, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, AMED, ISI Web of Science and WorldCat Dissertations were searched using an extensive list of synonyms for ADHD and ID. CENTRAL, CCDPLP, Current Controlled Trials meta-register (mRCT), CenterWatch, NHS National Research Register, clinicaltrials.gov were searched, pharmaceutical companies and experts in the field were contacted. Reference lists of review articles were examined and citation searches were performed in ISI Web of Knowledge.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs), both published and unpublished, in any language, in which children or adults with ADHD and ID were treated with risperidone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection and analyses were planned but not performed due to a lack of suitable studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies were considered but none were suitable for inclusion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from RCTs that risperidone is effective for the treatment of ADHD in people with ID. Prescribing in this population can only be based on open-label studies or extrapolation from research in people with autism and disruptive behaviour disorders; however these studies have not investigated people with ID separately so there are reservations regarding the applicability of these findings. Research into effectiveness and tolerability is urgently needed.

Risperidone, haloperidol, and placebo in the treatment of aggressive challenging behaviour in patients with intellectual disability: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Aggressive challenging behaviour is frequently reported in adults with intellectual disability and it is often treated with antipsychotic drugs. However, no adequate evidence base for this practice exists. We compared flexible doses of haloperidol (a typical, first-generation antipsychotic drug), risperidone (an atypical, second-generation antipsychotic), and placebo, in the treatment of this behaviour.

METHODS

86 non-psychotic patients presenting with aggressive challenging behaviour from ten centres in England and Wales, and one in Queensland, Australia, were randomly assigned to haloperidol (n=28), risperidone (n=29), or placebo (n=29). Clinical assessments of aggression, aberrant behaviour, quality of life, adverse drug effects, and carer uplift (positive feelings about the care of the disabled person) and burden, together with total costs, were recorded at 4, 12, and 26 weeks. The primary outcome was change in aggression after 4 weeks' treatment, which was recorded with the modified overt aggression scale (MOAS). Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered as ISRCTN 11736448.

FINDINGS

80 patients had adherence of 80% or more to prescribed drug. Aggression decreased substantially with all three treatments by 4 weeks, with the placebo group showing the greatest change (median decrease in MOAS score after 4 weeks=9 [95% CI 5-14] for placebo, 79% from baseline; 7 [4-14] for risperidone, 58% from baseline; 6.5 [5-14] for haloperidol, 65% from baseline; p=0.06). Furthermore, although no important differences between the treatments were recorded, including adverse effects, patients given placebo showed no evidence at any time points of worse response than did patients assigned to either of the antipsychotic drugs.

INTERPRETATION

Antipsychotic drugs should no longer be regarded as an acceptable routine treatment for aggressive challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disability.

The effectiveness of antipsychotic medication in the management of behaviour problems in adults with intellectual disabilities

BACKGROUND

Psychopharmacological intervention in the management of behaviour problems in adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) has become a common treatment strategy. This has become a cause for concern, given that the evidence for its effectiveness is uncertain and most drugs are not licensed for this use.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review of empirical research on the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication was conducted. Electronic and manual searches of literature were conducted. Stringent scientific methodology determined those primary trials that were worthy of inclusion.

RESULTS

This review revealed one randomized controlled trial (RCT), one controlled, four uncontrolled prospective and three retrospective case series studies in adults. Additionally, two studies in both adults and children--one crossover RCT and one prospective controlled trial--were found.

CONCLUSION

Presently, there is RCT-based evidence for risperidone to be effective in both adults and children; however, this treatment carries a certain amount of risk associated with adverse effects. There is also evidence to support the use of other antipsychotics, primarily atypicals, but the evidence is based on noncontrolled case studies. There is currently not enough evidence available to recommend specific medication for specific behaviour problems. Before prescribing medication, clinicians should carry out a thorough assessment of behaviour, including its causes and consequences, and draw up a formulation providing the rationale for the prescribed intervention after considering all medication- and nonmedication-based management options.

The effectiveness of antidepressant medication in the management of behaviour problems in adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

A comprehensive systematic review was performed to establish the current evidence base regarding the effectiveness of antidepressant medication for the management of behaviour problems in adults with intellectual disabilities.

METHOD

An electronic search of PsycInfo, Embase, Medline and Cinahl databases was conducted spanning the time period 1990 to October 2005 for primary trials. This was supplemented by hand searching and cross-referencing of relevant reviews. Strict scientific methodology requirements were formulated that the studies had to meet in order to merit inclusion in this review.

RESULTS

One crossover randomized controlled trial in a small cohort, seven prospective uncontrolled trials and two retrospective studies were yielded in the search. Of these, one explored the effectiveness of the tricyclic antidepressant--clomipramine, and nine considered various selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).

CONCLUSION

Evidence based primarily on a small number of either prospective or retrospective case studies that included a small number of participants and often used non-validated outcome measures for a short period of follow-up, suggests that antidepressants, particularly SSRIs, show improvement of aggression and self-injurious behaviour on average in less than 50% of cases and the rest show either no improvement or deterioration. The effect is most pronounced in the presence of an underlying anxiety or an associated diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Most studies have highlighted the concern regarding adverse effects.

Risperidone in the management of disruptive behavior disorders

Disruptive behavior disorders (DBDs) represent a spectrum of disorders, including conduct disorder and oppositional-defiant disorder. The atypical antipsychotic risperidone may be useful for the management of patients with DBDs. Clinical data on risperidone have demonstrated efficacy and satisfactory tolerability in improving angry, aggressive, self-injurious, and disruptive symptoms and behavior in children with pervasive developmental disorders and mood disorders. This paper reviews the results of recent studies that have evaluated the efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of pediatric patients with DBDs. Because concerns have been raised regarding the safety of atypical antipsychotic treatment in pediatric patients, this paper further evaluates safety risks by presenting newly completed analyses of movement disorders, prolactin concentrations, body weight, and cognitive function data from short- and long-term studies in this patient population. A comprehensive review of all of the findings suggests that risperidone is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for children and adolescents with DBDs. As with all antipsychotics, practitioners should monitor young patients' growth, weight, sexual maturation, and metabolic parameters.

Reviewing the use of antipsychotic drugs in people with intellectual disability

INTRODUCTION

Antipsychotics are the most widely prescribed drugs in people with intellectual disability even if schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders do not affect more than 3% of such population. Many authors outline the lack of studies on the efficacy of antipsychotics on schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders in people with intellectual disability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The aim of the present study is to review all evidences resulting from international trials selected by Medline, and compare efficacy and side effects of different antipsychotics in people with both intellectual disability and psychotic disorders and/or behavioural disorders.

RESULTS

195 studies were identified; 117 concern traditional antipychotics while 78 new generation ones. If we consider the type of studies, it results that only the 12.8% of all production is represented by meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and randomised and not controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews would be the golden standard for therapeutical studies; unfortunately they are really few in this field. It is anyway significative that all the studies reported focus on the use of antipsychotics in people with intellectual disability presenting behavioural problems. To increase the validity of these studies it is recommendable to proceed only with well-designed studies, possibly double-blind versus placebo or other medications. There is need to define precise inclusion criteria, precise symptomatological or behavioural targets and adaptative ability assessment, using valid and reliable diagnostic instruments.

The use of risperidone among individuals with mental retardation: clinically supported or not?

Since their introduction, antipsychotic medications have been used widely to treat conditions other than psychiatric disorders, especially among individuals with mental retardation. Researchers have shown that the prevalence rates of psychotropic medication prescriptions among this population are extremely high. Given the limited empirical data to support the use of psychotropic medications, specifically antipsychotics, among individuals with mental retardation, this trend is a cause for concern. This review was undertaken in an effort to summarize the available studies regarding the use of the atypical antipsychotic drug risperidone among individuals with mental retardation and provide a resource for clinicians, care givers, and parents. Based on the results of this review, the effectiveness of risperidone in targeting psychopathology and challenging behaviors for individuals with mental retardation is questionable at present.

Short- and long-term efficacy and safety of risperidone in adults with disruptive behavior disorders

RATIONALE

Function in society can be severely affected by disruptive behaviors in adults.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of disruptive behavior disorders in intellectually disabled adults.

METHODS

Intellectually disabled patients with disruptive behavior disorder were randomly assigned to receive risperidone (n = 39) in a flexible dosage ranging from 1 to 4 mg/day (mean dosage, 1.45+/-0.08 mg/day) or placebo (n = 38) for 4 weeks of double-blind treatment. Efficacy at endpoint was measured primarily by using the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC); secondary efficacy measures included the Behavior Problems Inventory and Clinical Global Impressions scales. After this 4-week period, patients could enter open-label treatment with risperidone for 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Risperidone was well tolerated, and patients treated with risperidone demonstrated significantly greater improvement at endpoint on the ABC than those who received placebo [-27.3 points (52.8% improvement) versus -14.9 points (31.3% improvement); P = 0.036] and also improved on Behavior Problems Inventory and Clinical Global Impressions ratings. Over the 48-week, open-label follow-up period, there was a further decrease of 6.3 points (P < or = 0.05) on the ABC for patients who initially received risperidone and a decrease of 11.3 points (P < or = 0.05) for patients who initially received placebo and were switched to open-label risperidone. These results were achieved with a mean modal dosage of 1.8 mg/day.

CONCLUSION

Risperidone is efficacious and well tolerated in managing disruptive behavior disorders in adults with intellectual disability.

Risperidone in children with disruptive behavior disorders and subaverage intelligence: a 1-year, open-label study of 504 patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term safety and effectiveness of risperidone for severe disruptive behaviors in children.

METHOD

A multisite, 1-year, open-label study of patients aged 5 to 14 years with disruptive behaviors and subaverage intelligence was conducted.

RESULTS

Seventy-three percent of the 504 patients enrolled completed the study. The mean +/- SE dose of risperidone was 1.6 +/- 0.0 mg/day. The most common adverse events were somnolence (30%), rhinitis (27%), and headache (22%). The incidence of movement disorders was low, and mean Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale scores decreased during risperidone treatment. No clinically significant changes in mean laboratory values were noted, except for a transient increase in serum prolactin levels. Scores on the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form Conduct Problem Scale improved significantly as early as week 1, and improvement was maintained throughout the trial (p < .001 at each time point). Significant improvements were noted on positive social behavior and other Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form subscales, Aberrant Behavior Checklist, Clinical Global Impressions scale, and tests of patients' cognitive function (each p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Risperidone was well tolerated and effective in the long-term treatment of disruptive behavior disorders in children with subaverage intelligence.

Antipsychotic medication for challenging behaviour in people with learning disability

BACKGROUND

The term 'challenging behaviour', in the absence of psychiatric disorder, encompasses a wide range of behaviours that may be harmful to people or property, may be difficult to manage and may limit access to community facilities. Antipsychotic medications have been used to modify such behaviours in people with learning disability, but there is little evidence to suggest that the benefits outweigh the risks.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication for people with learning disability and challenging behaviour without additional mental illness.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Biological Abstracts, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and BIOSIS were searched. Further references were sought from published trials and pharmaceutical companies. Trials were reliably identified and data extracted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials of antipsychotic medication versus placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Reviewers independently evaluated and analysed data on an intention to treat basis. Data were evaluated at 4, 8 and 12 weeks as longer follow-up data were not available. Reviewers assumed that those subjects lost to follow-up had a bad outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

Only nine randomised controlled trials could be included in the analyses. These provided no evidence of whether antipsychotic medication helps or harms adults with learning disability and challenging behaviour.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There are limited data on this important issue and more research is urgently needed.

Use of functional analysis methodology in the evaluation of medication effects

The atypical antipsychotic medication risperidone was evaluated using a double-blind, placebo-controlled design in the treatment of destructive behavior in two individuals with autism. Pre-medication functional analyses indicated that destructive behavior was maintained by escape from demands, attention, or access to tangible items. For both individuals, destructive behavior during the demand condition was significantly reduced during the medication phases, whereas destructive behavior continued to occur to obtain tangible items (Reggie) and attention (Sean). In addition, there appeared to be a differential effect of the medication on self-injurious behavior (SIB) versus aggression for Sean. Results of the study demonstrate how functional analysis may provide information on those conditions and behaviors that are most likely to be affected by a specific medication.

Psychopharmacological treatments in persons with dual diagnosis of psychiatric disorders and developmental disabilities

People with developmental disabilities are at considerable risk for the development of comorbid psychiatric conditions. Psychopharmacological treatments may have a crucial role in a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach to the management of psychopathology in this population. Psychiatric illnesses that are particularly amenable include mood disorders, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorders (ADHDs) and antidepressants, mood stabilisers, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, and stimulants should be considered, respectively. ADHD may also respond to alpha(2)-agonists. Psychotropic agents such as beta-antagonists can target aggressive, self injurious, and stereotypical behaviours and opioid antagonists may be helpful in treating self injurious behaviour and stereotypy. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, newer anticonvulsants, and atypical neuroleptics are preferred when treating psychiatric disorders among people with developmental disabilities. This paper will review the major studies of pharmacological treatment of mental illness in individuals with developmental disabilities.

Effects of risperidone on conduct and disruptive behavior disorders in children with subaverage IQs

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether risperidone is effective in reducing symptoms of disruptive behaviors (such as aggression, impulsivity, defiance of authority figures, and property destruction) associated with conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and disruptive behavior disorder-not otherwise specified in children with subaverage IQs.

METHOD

The trial consisted of a 1-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period and was followed by a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period. One hundred ten children (aged 5-12 years inclusive) with an IQ of 36-84 with a disruptive behavior disorder and a score of at least 24 on the Conduct Problem subscale of the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form (NCBRF) were enrolled. Eighty percent of subjects had comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Risperidone doses ranged from 0.02 to 0.06 mg/kg per day. Subjects were rated on the NCBRF, Aberrant Behavior Checklist, Behavior Problems Inventory, Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), modified California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), and a continuous performance task (CPT).

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat analysis of risperidone-treated subjects showed a significant (p < .001) reduction in mean scores (from 33.4 at baseline to 17.6 at end point; 47.3% reduction) versus placebo-treated subjects (mean baseline of 32.6 to 25.8 at end point; 20.9% reduction) on the Conduct Problem subscale of the NCBRF. Between-group differences in favor of risperidone were seen as early as week 1 and were significant at all post-baseline visits. Other subscales showed significant improvement with risperidone compared with placebo. CGI scale ratings of improvement showed highly significant gains for risperidone over placebo. A subanalysis demonstrated that the effect of risperidone was unaffected by diagnosis, presence/absence of ADHD, psychostimulant use, IQ status, and somnolence. Risperidone produced no changes on the cognitive variables (CPT/modified CVLT). The most common side effects included somnolence, headache, appetite increase, and dyspepsia. Side effects related to extrapyramidal symptoms were reported in 7 (13.2%) and 3 (5.3%) of the subjects in the risperidone and placebo groups, respectively (p = .245).

CONCLUSIONS

Risperidone appears to be an adequately tolerated and effective treatment in children with subaverage IQs and severe disruptive behaviors such as aggression and destructive behavior.

Treatment with atypical antipsychotics: new indications and new populations

Atypical antipsychotics have revolutionized the treatment of schizophrenia, becoming the treatment of choice for patients not only during their first episode, but also throughout their life course. Of note, as of 1999 more than 70% of prescriptions for these drugs are being prescribed for conditions other than schizophrenia, such as bipolar disorder and geriatric agitation. While there have been very few controlled trials that have established the efficacy of the atypical antipsychotics for these "off-label" uses, there have been a large number of open trials and case reports. The few controlled trials suggest that the atypical antipsychotics may be useful for affective disorders (both mania and depression), geriatric conditions such as senile dementia and aggression, as well as a variety of other disorders. Atypical agents may be particularly helpful for elderly, child, or adolescent patients who are especially susceptible to the side effects of medications and whose risk of tardive dyskinesia is high but further controlled studies are necessary.

Does risperidone have a place in the treatment of nonschizophrenic patients?

There is a now a substantial body of evidence that suggests the new antipsychotic agent, risperidone, may be safe and effective for treating psychotic, affective or behavioural symptoms associated with various disorders other than schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder or schizo-affective disorder. These conditions include bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, Tourette's syndrome, dementia, Lewy body disease, mental retardation, Parkinson's disease, idiopathic segmental dystonia and organic catatonia. Although much of the data is anecdotal or in the form of open studies, there is now emerging a small number of well controlled investigations supporting efficacy for mania, dementia, behavioural disturbance in mental retardation and conduct disorder. Conventional antipsychotics have long been used, either in a primary capacity or as an adjunct to treat these disorders; however, they have limited benefit, pose significant risks of extrapyramidal side-effects, and may cause the potentially life-threatening neuroleptic malignant syndrome. In contrast, risperidone at the recommended low doses may be efficacious and pose reduced risk of motor side-effects. This article reviews the evidence that risperidone may be an effective new treatment for disorders other than schizophrenia.

Olanzapine for chronic, stereotypic self-injurious behaviour: a pilot study in seven adults with intellectual disability

Dopamine one (D1) receptor supersensitvity in the corpus striatum is said to be the primary mechanism within the dopamine model proposed for chronic, refractory self-injurious behaviour (SIB), which may explain why conventional neuroleptics have proven largely ineffective. In common with other atypical antipsychotic agents, olanzapine has more affinity for the D1 receptor. The present study explored whether olanzapine could reduce rates of the stereotypic form of chronic SIB, a subtype where dopamine dysfunction is the most likely underlying mechanism. A clinical sample of seven patients with various levels of learning disability who displayed features of stereotypic SIB were assessed over a 6-week period of baseline measurement and a 15-week treatment phase during which olanzapine was added to existing medication. Both SIB and other aberrant behaviours were measured by daily nurse rating and the Self-Injury Trauma Scale (SITS). All measurements were unblind. Doses ranged from 5 to 15 mg. Out of the seven subjects, three showed a clear improvement, one showed a marginal improvement, one deteriorated, and the data was equivocal for the remaining two individuals. The means of the SITS Number and Severity Indices (NI and SI, respectively) reduced significantly from baseline during both the 5- and 10-mg treatment phases, and taking treatment as a whole, by 53% and 48%, respectively (NI: mean = 0.7 units reduction, P = 0.02; SI: mean = 0.9 units reduction, P = 0.04). The risk index also reduced, but did not reach significance. A modest reduction in mean nurse-rated SIB was not significant for either phase or for treatment as a whole. At doses above 5mg, mean scores deteriorated on balance, although two responders showed a marginal additional improvement. Olanzapine was well tolerated with one adverse event reported (somnolence) which was mild and transient. The present pilot study suggests that olanzapine can reduce stereotypic SIB. A larger trial is indicated.

Impact of risperidone on seclusion and restraint at a state psychiatric hospital

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of risperidone on seclusion and restraint in patients at a state psychiatric facility, shortly after risperidone's release.

METHODS

Patients who were in the hospital for at least 3 months prior to receiving risperidone and subsequently received risperidone for at least 3 months formed the cohort. A mirror-image design was used with duration to a maximum of 1 year before and 1 year after initiation of risperidone. The hospital population that did not receive either risperidone or clozapine during the same time period was used for comparison of trends of seclusion and restraint.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients (most with schizophrenia) met the inclusion criteria of the risperidone group. There were statistically significant decreases in the number of seclusion hours (2.2 [SD 5.5] to 0.26 [SD 0.06]) and of events (0.23 [SD 0.59] to 0.05 [SD 0.14]) per person per month during risperidone treatment, compared with the prerisperidone treatment period (P = 0.01). The comparison group also evidenced decreases on these measures during the same time period, but the risperidone-treated cohort achieved a proportionally greater reduction. There were similar trends toward reduction in the restraint measures during risperidone treatment compared with prerisperidone, but these did not achieve statistical significance. The comparison group also showed slightly decreased use of restraints over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Risperidone appears to have had a positive impact on seclusion in this state-hospital psychiatric population. These data support the positive impact of risperidone on violence found in other studies. Violence and aggression are major factors that affect morale among psychiatric patients and staff. So, any benefit in this regard as a result of antipsychotic drug treatment is salutary for patients, families, and health care providers.

Psychopharmacology and mental retardation: a 10 year review (1990-1999)

We conducted a 10 year review of the literature pertaining to psychopharmacology and mental retardation. Studies were included or excluded from the review based on meeting one or more of the methodological criteria normally considered fundamental for sound scientific research. The vast majority of studies conducted in the last 10 years in this area had major methodological flaws. While a large number of medications were prescribed for various psychological disorders and behavior problems, most drug administrations were not based in science, were not evaluated appropriately, and generally did not follow best practices for treatment of persons with mental retardation. Very few medications prescribed were behavior or psychiatric symptom specific; that is, most medications were given to suppress a myriad of aberrant behaviors thus chemically restraining the individual in question. Practices such as these present serious problems for service providers due to the deleterious side effects of many psychotropic medications and the federal government's intervention into the care-provision practices of developmental centers, community homes, and other living arrangements for persons with mental retardation. Implications of our review are discussed.

Inpatient treatment of severe disruptive behaviour disorders with risperidone and milieu therapy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the therapeutic impact of adding risperidone to milieu therapy of latency-aged inpatients with severe disruptive disorders.

METHODS

The charts of 90 latency-aged patients consecutively admitted to a psychiatry ward were reviewed retrospectively. Fifteen of these patients received risperidone treatment, were nonpsychotic, and did not suffer from pervasive developmental disorder (12 male, 3 female; mean age 9.99 years, SD 1.76). Their scores on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) were compared at admission, before risperidone treatment, and at discharge.

RESULTS

All subjects were diagnosed with a disruptive behavioural disorder. Ten (66.67%) had additional learning difficulties, and 13 (86.7%) had pathological personality traits. The characteristics of the sample suggested borderline pathology or multiple complex developmental disorder. Following a mean of 38 days after admission (SD 22.3), the patients received risperidone for a mean of 46 days (SD 28.2) before being discharged. The mean maintenance dose of risperidone was 1.27 mg daily (SD 0.36). Mean CGAS scores increased from admission (21.9, SD 7.0) to before risperidone treatment (26.8, SD 7.6, P < 0.0001) and to discharge (50.3, SD 5.3, P < 0.0001). Only 2 patients had documented side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose risperidone used adjunctively to milieu therapy led to statistically and clinically significant additional improvement in the functioning of hospitalized latency-aged children with severe behavioural disorders. Low-dose risperidone is a safe and effective adjunct to milieu therapy for treating this population in inpatient settings. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Use of the atypical antipsychotics Olanzapine and Risperidone in adults with intellectual disability

The present study was designed to monitor the use of atypical antipsychotics in adults with intellectual disability and to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of these drugs. Twenty-one patients were commenced on an atypical antipsychotic: 12 on Olanzapine and nine on Risperidone. The ICD-10 diagnoses of the subjects were mild (13 cases) or moderate (8 cases) mental retardation, and psychiatric disorders (17 cases) with significant impairment of behaviour in 10 cases. Tolerability was good for 15 patients experiencing minimum or no side-effects, and medication was only stopped as a result of side-effects in one case. Clinical global outcome was rated as minimally improved or better for 16 cases. The present findings suggest that the atypical antipsychotics Olanzapine and Risperidone are well tolerated by patients with intellectual disability and psychiatric disorders, and are broadly effective against target symptoms.

Antipsychotic medication for challenging behaviour in people with learning disability

BACKGROUND

The term 'challenging behaviour', in the absence of psychiatric disorder, encompasses a wide range of behaviours that may be harmful to people or property, may be difficult to manage and may limit access to community facilities. Antipsychotic medications have been used to modify such behaviours in people with learning disability, but there is little evidence to suggest that the benefits outweigh the risks.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication for people with learning disability and challenging behaviour.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Biological abstracts, the Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycLIT were searched. Further references were sought from published trials and pharmaceutical companies. Trials were reliably identified and data extracted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials of antipsychotic medication versus placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Reviewers independently evaluated and analysed data on an intention to treat basis. Data were evaluated at 4 and 8 weeks as longer follow-up data were not available. Reviewers assumed that those subjects lost to follow-up had a bad outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

Only three randomised controlled trials could be included in the analyses. These provided no evidence of whether antipsychotic medication helps or harms adults with learning disability and challenging behaviour.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is limited data on this important issue and more research is urgently needed.

Antipsychotic medication for challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disability: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

A study was performed to determine the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication for people with intellectual disability (ID) and challenging behaviour. Randomized controlled trials comparing antipsychotic medication to placebo in people with ID and challenging behaviour were identified by electronic searching and hand-searching. Reviewers independently evaluated and analysed data on an intention-to-treat basis. Only three randomized controlled trials could be included in the analyses. These trials provided no evidence as to whether antipsychotic medication does or does not help adults with ID and challenging behaviour. There is limited data on this important issue and good quality research is urgently needed.

Psychopharmacotherapy in children and adults with intellectual disability

The prevalence of psychiatric disorders is increased in children and adults with intellectual disability. Brain damage or dysfunction interact with social and family factors to increase susceptibility to mental illness. Psychiatric disorders in the context of genetic syndromes are commonly overlooked, and there is substantial underdiagnosis of mental disorders because of the atypical and non-specific clinical presentations, and the frequent assumption that psychiatric symptoms are an inherent part of the underlying intellectual disability. There is a strong need for evidence-based practice in the prescribing and monitoring of drugs in this population, especially since many of the drugs are unlicensed for use in children. There is an urgent need to understand and establish the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and side-effect profiles of psychotropic medication in this population. Positive trends in pharmacotherapy include the use of atypical antipsychotics instead of the classic antipsychotics, serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) rather than tricyclic antidepressants, and newer antiepileptic drugs. Another welcome trend is the use of SSRIs instead of antipsychotics in the long-term management of challenging behaviour in this population.

The antipsychotics. A pediatric perspective

As can be discerned from this article, antipsychotics are commonly prescribed, and they are not used to treat only psychosis. Although some data support the use of typical antipsychotics in pediatric patients with a variety of psychiatric syndromes, concerns about the safety and tolerability of these agents often complicated their use and probably even interfered with case identification. A fundamentally new group of medications, the atypicals, have now become available and may not only have improved tolerability but also may have greater ability to reduce some target symptoms. Because of their superior side-effect profile in adults, some of these atypical treatments probably will be commonly prescribed despite a relative paucity of data about their use in the young. Moreover, although frequently prescribed in this age group, the overall prescription rate for antipsychotics will probably increase because of the putative improved safety profile of the newer agents. However, it is possible that serious side effects, such as tardive dyskinesia or neuroleptic malignant syndrome, may occur with these atypical agents. For this reason, the enthusiasm for prescribing these newer treatments should be tempered with the understanding that these agents, although they may in some ways be superior to their predecessors, still possess the potential for significant adverse events. Four atypical antipsychotics are currently marketed in the United States (see Table 2). One additional agent, ziprasodone, is undergoing clinical investigation. Ziprasodone has been shown to be superior to placebo in adults suffering from schizophrenia. Ziprasodone will probably be marketed in the United States in the near future. Whether all of these atypical drugs will have a place in the clinical armamentarium of the pediatric psychopharmacologist remains to be determined. Because the receptor binding profile of the atypical agents differ, it is not possible to assume that what is true for one of these agents is true for the others. Although results from most preliminary studies with atypical antipsychotics indicate that these are promising agents for pediatric patients, further research is needed to define just how these medications may be most judiciously used.

Risperidone for aggression and self-injurious behavior in adults with mental retardation

Risperidone has proven efficacy with reduced likelihood of causing extrapyramidal symptoms in the treatment of schizophrenia. Initial work suggests its utility in the management of aggression and self injury in patients with mental retardation. The use of risperidone in eight adult patients with moderate to profound mental retardation is described. Risperidone in these individuals was associated with significant reduction in aggression and self injurious behavior. Side effects were primarily those of sedation and restlessness. These cases illustrate the possible utility of risperidone in the treatment of aggression and self injury in adult patients with moderate to profound mental retardation.

An open trial of risperidone in young autistic children

OBJECTIVE

To assess the benefits and side effects of risperidone in young autistic children.

METHOD

In this open, prospective trial, subjects were treated with risperidone for 12 weeks. All subjects were started at 0.5 mg daily with individual titration to a maximum of 6 mg or 0.1 mg/kg daily. Behavioral ratings, completed by the investigators and the children's parents, included the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), Children's Psychiatric Rating Scale, Conners Parent-Teacher Questionnaire, Childhood Autism Rating Scale, and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale.

RESULTS

Ten boys, aged 4.5 to 10.8 years, were enrolled in the study and all completed the 12-week protocol. The mean final dose was 1.3 mg/day (range = 1 to 2.5 mg/day). On the basis of CGI-rated improvement, 8 of the 10 children were considered to be responders. Improvement was also demonstrated on the other scales. Transient sedation was common, and the children gained an average of 3.5 kg over the 12 weeks of the study. There was no evidence of either extrapyramidal symptoms or tardive dyskinesia.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that risperidone may be safe and leads to improvements in several behavioral symptoms in young children with autism. Controlled studies of risperidone in young autistic children are warranted.