Observations on switching patients with schizophrenia to risperidone treatment. Risperidone Switching Study Group

The effectiveness and safety of amisulpride in Chinese patients with schizophrenia who switch from risperidone or olanzapine: a subgroup analysis of the ESCAPE study

INTRODUCTION

Second-generation antipsychotics show significant interpatient variability in treatment response and side-effect profiles, and the majority of patients with schizophrenia require multiple treatment changes. This subgroup analysis of the ESCAPE study evaluated the efficacy and safety of amisulpride in Chinese patients with schizophrenia who switched from risperidone or olanzapine.

METHODS

ESCAPE was a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm Phase IV study in which Chinese patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of schizophrenia received amisulpride for 8 weeks. This analysis included 109 patients who switched to amisulpride from risperidone (n=68) or olanzapine (n=41) and 59 treatment-naïve patients for reference. The primary effectiveness outcome was a ≥50% decrease in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total score from Baseline to Week 8. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01795183).

RESULTS

Of the patients who switched from risperidone and olanzapine, 77.9% and 56.1% achieved ≥50% reduction in PANSS Total score from Baseline to Week 8 and 57.4% and 46.3% achieved ≥20% reduction in PANSS score from Baseline to Week 2, respectively; these end points were achieved by 66.1% and 61.0% of treatment-naïve patients, respectively. No unexpected adverse events (AEs) were reported. Of the most common AEs, extrapyramidal side effects occurred in 32.4% and 14.6%, blood prolactin increase in 32.4% and 39.0%, and ≥7% increase in body weight in 4.4% and 12% of patients switching from risperidone and olanzapine, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this subgroup analysis suggest that switching to amisulpride from risperidone and olanzapine is effective and generally well tolerated in Chinese patients with schizophrenia.

Withdrawal symptoms and rebound syndromes associated with switching and discontinuing atypical antipsychotics: theoretical background and practical recommendations

With the widespread use of atypical or second-generation antipsychotics, switching treatment has become current practice and more complicated, as the pharmacological profiles of these agents differ substantially despite their similarity in being 'atypical'. All share the ability to block dopamine D₂ receptors, and most of them also block serotonin 5-HT2A receptors. Apart from these common features, some atypical antipsychotics are also able to block or stimulate other dopamine or serotonin receptors, as well as histaminergic, muscarinergic or adrenergic receptors. As a result of the varying receptor affinities, in switching or discontinuing compounds several possible pitfalls have to be considered, including the occurrence of withdrawal and rebound syndromes. This article reviews the pharmacological background of functional blockade or stimulation of receptors of interest in regard to atypical antipsychotics and the implicated potential withdrawal and rebound phenomena. A MEDLINE search was carried out to identify information on withdrawal or rebound syndromes occurring after discontinuation of atypical antipsychotics. Using the resulting literature, we first discuss the theoretical background to the functional consequences of atypical antipsychotic-induced blockade or stimulation of neurotransmitter receptors and, secondly, we highlight the clinical consequences of this. We then review the available clinical literature on switching between atypical antipsychotics, with respect to the occurrence of withdrawal or rebound symptoms. Finally, we offer practical recommendations based on the reviewed findings. The systematic evaluation of withdrawal or rebound phenomena using randomized controlled trials is still understudied. Knowledge of pharmacological receptor-binding profiles may help clinicians in choosing adequate switching or discontinuation strategies for each agent. Results from large switching trials indicate that switching atypical antipsychotics can be performed in a safe manner. Treatment-emergent adverse events during or after switching are not always considered to be, at least in part, associated with the pre-switch antipsychotic. Further studies are needed to substantiate the evidence gained so far on different switching strategies. The use of concomitant medication, e.g., benzodiazepines or anticholinergic drugs, may help to minimize symptoms arising from the discontinuation or switching of antipsychotic treatment.

Immediate versus gradual suspension of previous treatments during switch to aripiprazole: results of a randomized, open label study

The aim of the present work was to investigate possible differences in terms of efficacy and tolerability between different switching options to aripiprazole. 77 subjects were randomly assigned to (1) administration of aripiprazole (10 mg) with simultaneous discontinuation of current antipsychotic; (2) administration of aripiprazole (10 mg) and tapering off current antipsychotic over 4 weeks with half dose after the first 2 weeks; (3) administration of aripiprazole (10 mg) and tapering off current antipsychotic over 6 weeks with half dose after the first 2 weeks. Efficacy assessments included CGI-S, CGI-I, BPRS and SANS. Safety assessments included SAS, BAS and AIMS. Severity of symptoms significantly decreased from baseline over the 12 weeks of treatment. Patients switched to aripiprazole with immediate discontinuation of the previous antipsychotic showed an increase of symptoms' severity at week 1. However, severity of side effects did not overall change significantly during the 12-weeks follow-up. Previous treatment's tapering off strategy for switching patients to aripiprazole could be preferable as compared to abrupt discontinuation, in order to prevent early worsening of symptoms and premature discontinuation of treatment, though this results has to be considered with caution given the limitations of the study.

Effects of switching from conventional antipsychotics to risperidone in Japanese patients with chronic schizophrenia

Atypical antipsychotics are rapidly evolving to become the standard pharmacotherapy in schizophrenia; however, the trend of switching to such drugs is not necessarily progressing quickly in East Asia. This might be due to the scarcity of evidence for the efficacy of switching from conventional to atypical antipsychotics, which prompted the authors to examine effects of switching from conventional antipsychotics to an atypical drug, risperidone, in Japanese patients. Fifty patients with chronic schizophrenia completed the study in which combination therapy with other antipsychotics was allowed if monotherapy with risperidone was not tolerated. Symptoms were assessed with the brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS). Switching to monotherapy was achieved in 34 patients (68%). The number of antipsychotics prescribed to each patient was reduced (from 2.1 to 1.4 drugs; P < 0.001) and the use of antiparkinsonian drugs decreased (P < 0.001). The mean BPRS score was also reduced 6 months after initiation of the switch (P < 0.001). Failure in switching to monotherapy was associated with higher dosage of antipsychotics at baseline. Switching from conventional antipsychotics to risperidone reduced schizophrenia symptoms, antiparkinsonian medication, and polypharmacy. However, a portion of patients, particularly those who receive an excessive dosage of antipsychotics, might not tolerate such switching.

A review of pharmacologic strategies for switching to atypical antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

In daily clinical practice, frequent switching of antipsychotic medications is widespread. There are various reasons for switching, including a partial or complete lack of efficacy, adverse side effects, and partial or noncompliance with medication. Patients switched from conventional drugs to oral atypical antipsychotic drugs have been shown to benefit from significant improvements in clinical response and tolerability. This review examines the strategies for switching patients from conventional antipsychotic drugs to both oral and long-acting formulations of atypical antipsychotic drugs that are the recommended treatment in the majority of patients with schizophrenia.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

An electronic literature search of relevant studies using MEDLINE (January 1994-June 2004) was performed using the search terms antipsychotic, atypical, conventional, schizophrenia, and switching. English-language articles, references from bibliographies of reviews, original research articles, and other articles of interest were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data quality was determined by publication in the peer-reviewed literature and the most important information identified. Data from clinical trials suggest that switching to an atypical antipsychotic drug is beneficial for the patient with schizophrenia.

CONCLUSIONS

If initiated appropriately, switching to atypical antipsychotic medications should not compromise patient functioning; indeed, individualized strategies have been shown to provide continuous treatment efficacy. Switching to atypical antipsychotic therapy should, therefore, be employed as a pharmacologic strategy to maximize patient outcomes.

Switching atypical antipsychotics: a review

BACKGROUND

Atypical antipsychotics are increasingly used in the treatment of diverse psychiatric disorders; however, there is little information on the 'why, when, and how' of switching between the different atypical antipsychotics currently available.

OBJECTIVE

To review the data on switching and atypical antipsychotics.

METHODS

A literature search was initially conducted using the key words followed by a search of relevant articles including conference abstracts; relevant pharmaceutical companies were also contacted.

RESULTS

Clinical trial data are limited in terms of parameters measured, and case reports describe specific problems. Few studies are based on real world populations of psychiatric patients over the long-term. Careful patient and drug selections matched to a carefully supervised and appropriate cross titration based upon the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of all of the drugs involved is important to avoid potential complications such as re-emergence or worsening of psychosis and withdrawal, rebound, and emergent phenomena including new or uncovered side-effects. Psychoeducation and involvement of patients and caregivers in the process are also necessary for a successful switch.

CONCLUSION

Despite the prevalence of switching in real world clinical practice, there is a paucity of data to guide clinicians with respect to effective and safe strategies. There are no criteria defining a successful switch. With the increasing range and formulations of atypical antipsychotics available, there is a rationale for their early use to avoid the practical problems associated with switching from conventional antipsychotics as well as the opportunity to maintain patients on an optimal atypical antipsychotic monotherapy.

Long-acting injectable risperidone: safety and efficacy in stable patients switched from conventional depot antipsychotics

Long-acting injectable risperidone was assessed in schizophrenia patients who were symptomatically stable on conventional depot antipsychotics and who were then switched to long-acting risperidone. Participants in this open-label, multicentre, 12-week trial had received flupenthixol decanoate, fluphenazine decanoate, haloperidol decanoate, or zuclopenthixol decanoate for 4 months or longer. Each was considered symptomatically stable by investigators. After receiving two cycles of their conventional depot antipsychotic during the run-in period, patients were switched to receive long-acting risperidone every 2 weeks for 12 weeks at an initial dose of 25 mg. This dose could be increased in 12.5-mg increments at 4-week intervals. Ninety-two percent of the patients received all six injections; 62% received the 25-mg dose throughout the treatment period. Adverse events related to movement disorders were reported in 3%. Severity of movement disorders decreased during long-acting risperidone treatment. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and factor scores and scores on the Clinical Global Impressions severity scale were significantly reduced during treatment; 48% of these stable patients showed further symptom improvement (> or =20% decrease in PANSS score at endpoint). The results indicate that patients with schizophrenia who are symptomatically stable during treatment with a conventional depot antipsychotic can be safely and effectively switched to long-acting injectable risperidone without a prior transition to oral risperidone.

Antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia: atypical options and NICE guidance

Following the reintroduction of clozapine, several atypical antipsychotics have become available for the treatment of schizophrenia. These drugs are at least as effective as conventional treatment. Although each has an individual pattern of affinities, new work suggests that the hallmark of atypicality is fast dissociation at the dopamine-2 receptor. Numerous novel drugs are in development, but it is not clear how these conform to this theory of therapeutic effect. Atypical antipsychotics cause less extrapyramidal side effects than conventional treatment, but other effects such as hyperprolactinaemia, weight gain, glucose dysregulation and prolonged QTc interval remain problematic for some. Current antipsychotic prescribing practice is far from ideal: the NICE guidance stresses that atypical treatments should be considered unless symptoms are well controlled and side effects are acceptable, or depot formulation is indicated. There is a welcome emphasis on drug treatment as part of an integrated package of care negotiated with patients and their carers.

Risperidone in chronic schizophrenia: a detailed audit, open switch study and two-year follow-up of patients on depot medication

Little information exists on the medium- to long-term outcome of switching patients with schizophrenia from traditional depot to atypical oral antipsychotic agents. By detailed clinical audit, we identified a representative group of 102 patients of an Irish psychiatric service with DSM-IV chronic schizophrenia and on depot neuroleptics for a mean of 15 years. Of 69 eligible to participate, 33 entered a 6-month switch study of risperidone, with limited follow-up of consenters and non-consenters at 1 and 2 years. At 6 months, 23 of 33 were still on risperidone and had small significant improvements in clinical and extrapyramidal side effects, QOL and adjunct medication measures over baseline. At 12 months, 19 of 33 were still on risperidone, reducing to 13 of 33 at 2 years. At 2 years, of 32 surviving consenters to switch, 19 had suffered clinically detrimental events and were no longer on risperidone, compared to none of the 33 surviving non-consenters, who were all still on depot. These findings suggest that switching from depot to risperidone may encounter high rates of refusal and attrition subsequent to switch. While a majority of switched patients may improve to least 6 months, audit plus switch may have clinically unfavourable effects on others over a 2-year follow-up period [corrected].

Olanzapine as alternative therapy for patients with haloperidol-induced extrapyramidal symptoms: results of a multicenter, collaborative trial in Latin America

Conventional antipsychotic agents can induce extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) that may be alleviated by switching patients to novel agents such as olanzapine. Patients with schizophrenia and related disorders (ICD-10) who were taking haloperidol (N = 94; mean dose = 12.7 mg/day) and had EPS (Simpson-Angus Scale [SAS] > 3) were directly switched to 6 weeks of open-label olanzapine treatment (mean dose = 11.4 mg/day). There were significant mean improvements (p <0.001 for all measurements) from baseline to endpoint on the SAS (-9.69+/-5.33; percentage change, 87.2%), the Barnes Akathisia Scale (-1.00+/-1.19; percentage change, 82.5%), and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (-1.48+/-2.89; percentage change, 81.1%), and anticholinergic use decreased from 47.9% to 12.8% (mean baseline to endpoint change: -1.52+/-1.91-mg equivalents of benztropine; p < 0.001). Significant mean baseline to endpoint improvements (p < 0.001 for all measurements) were observed on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS; -25.28+/-18.67; percentage change, 30.3%), the PANSS-extracted Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (0-6 scale, -13.41+/-10.16; percentage change, 54.4%), and the Clinical Global Impressions Severity scale (-1.16+/-1.19; percentage change, 26.4%). Spontaneously reported treatment- emergent adverse events with a greater than 5% incidence were somnolence (16.0%), increased appetite (14.9%), weight gain (11.7%), headache (8.5%), anxiety (7.4%), dizziness (6.4%), and insomnia (5.3%). Criteria for a successful switch were met by 90.5% of patients. Psychotic symptom exacerbation was experienced by 30.9% of patients at any time during the study and by 11.7% of patients at endpoint. Results suggest that a direct switch to olanzapine is a therapeutic option when patients with haloperidol-induced EPS are unable to tolerate a more gradual switch.

Treatment of HIV-related psychotic disorders with risperidone: a series of 21 cases

We describe a consecutive series of 21 patients with HIV or AIDS who received risperidone for psychotic disorders. Of these, 13 became symptom-free, 7 showed substantial improvement, and 1 had no response. Most responded to low doses of risperidone (mean maximum dose 3.3 mg) and needed only a short course of treatment (mean 6.4 weeks). The 12 manic patients did particularly well: 9 became symptom-free and the mean Young mania rating scale fell from 28.36 to 3.91. No serious adverse effects were reported. Three patients became drowsy and two experienced drooling, but these resolved after dose reductions or at the end of treatment. No adverse hematological effects were observed. We suggest that risperidone may be the treatment of choice for patients with HIV-related psychotic disorders.