Olanzapine vs. other antipsychotics in actual out-patient settings: six months tolerability results from the European Schizophrenia Out-patient Health Outcomes study

A Review of Olanzapine in the Treatment of Cancer Anorexia-Cachexia Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CAS) is a multifactorial condition that is highly prevalent in advanced cancer patients and associated with significant reduction in functional performance, reduction in quality of life, and increased mortality. Currently, no medications are approved for this indication. Recently, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) released a rapid recommendation suggesting that low-dose olanzapine once daily may be used to treat cancer cachexia. Many questions still exist on how to use olanzapine for this indication in clinical practice. The objective of this review is to identify existing knowledge on the use of olanzapine for CAS.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted to identify the primary literature that involved olanzapine for anorexia and cachexia in cancer patients between 2000 and 2023.

RESULTS

Seven articles were identified and are discussed here, including two randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled studies, one randomized comparative study, two prospective open-label studies, one retrospective chart review, and one case report.

CONCLUSIONS

Low dose olanzapine (2.5-5 mg once daily) may be useful in the treatment of CAS for increasing appetite, reducing nausea and vomiting, and promoting weight gain. Further large-scale multi-center randomized placebo-controlled studies will be needed to investigate the impact of olanzapine on weight change in CAS patients.

Atypical antipsychotic olanzapine inhibits voltage-dependent K+ channels in coronary arterial smooth muscle cells

BACKGROUND

Olanzapine, an FDA-approved atypical antipsychotic, is widely used to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. In this study, the inhibitory effect of olanzapine on voltage-dependent K⁺ (Kv) channels in rabbit coronary arterial smooth muscle cells was investigated.

METHODS

Electrophysiological recordings were performed in freshly isolated coronary arterial smooth muscle cells.

RESULTS

Olanzapine inhibited the Kv channels in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC₅₀ value of 7.76 ± 1.80 µM and a Hill coefficient of 0.82 ± 0.09. Although olanzapine did not change the steady-state activation curve, it shifted the inactivation curve to a more negative potential, suggesting that it inhibited Kv currents by affecting the voltage sensor of the Kv channel. Application of 1 or 2 Hz train pulses did not affect the olanzapine-induced inhibition of Kv channels, suggesting that its effect on Kv channels occurs in a use (state)-independent manner. Pretreatment with DPO-1 (Kv1.5 subtype inhibitor) reduced the olanzapine-induced inhibition of Kv currents. In addition, pretreatment with guangxitoxin (Kv2.1 subtype inhibitor) and linopirdine (Kv7 subtype inhibitor) partially decreased the degree of Kv current inhibition. Olanzapine induced membrane depolarization.

CONCLUSION

From these results, we suggest that olanzapine inhibits the Kv channels in a concentration-dependent, but state-independent, manner by affecting the gating properties of Kv channels. The primary Kv channel target of olanzapine is the Kv1.5 subtype.

The usefulness of Olanzapine plasma concentrations in monitoring treatment efficacy and metabolic disturbances in first-episode psychosis

INTRODUCTION

The role of Olanzapine therapeutic drug monitoring is controversial. The present study explores the associations of Olanzapine plasma concentrations with clinical response and metabolic side effects in first episode psychosis (FEP) after 2 months of treatment.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients were included. Improvement in clinical symptomatology was assessed using the PANSS. Metabolic assessment included weight, blood pressure, waist circumference, blood glucose, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides.

RESULTS

The Olanzapine plasma concentrations after 2 months of treatment were positively correlated with weight gain (r = 0.49, p = 0.003), and a concentration > 23.28 ng/mL was identified as a positive predictor of weight gain (≥ 7%). The Olanzapine concentration to dose (C/D) ratio was positively correlated with the percentage of improvement in the total PANSS (r = 0.46, p = 0.004), and a C/D ratio > 2.12 was identified as a positive predictor of a good response (percentage of improvement > 30%) after 2 months of treatment. We also identified several factors that could alter Olanzapine pharmacokinetics: gender (p = 0.03), diagnosis (p = 0.05), smoking habit (p = 0.05), and co-medications such as valproic acid (p = 0.05) and anxiolytics (p = 0.01).

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, our results suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring of Olanzapine could be helpful to evaluate therapeutic efficacy and metabolic dysfunction in FEP patients treated with Olanzapine.

Antipsychotic type and correlates of antipsychotic treatment discontinuation in the outpatient treatment of schizophrenia

Antipsychotic medication maintenance and the factors influencing it were analyzed using data from the SOHO study, a large observational study of the outcomes of antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia in Europe. A total of 7186 adult patients in the outpatient setting who were initiating or changing their antipsychotic medication and who were prescribed only one antipsychotic after the baseline visit were analyzed. Medication maintenance at 12 months varied with the type of antipsychotic prescribed, being highest with clozapine (79.5%) and olanzapine (77.0%), and lowest with quetiapine (51.4%) and amisulpride (58.2%). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the type of antipsychotic prescribed at baseline was the most important predictor of medication maintenance. Alcohol dependency, taking mood stabilizers, compulsory admission or arrest in the previous 6 months, greater clinical severity, and changing antipsychotic medication due to lack of effectiveness at baseline predicted a higher frequency of medication discontinuation in the subsequent 12 months. In contrast, medication maintenance was higher among patients who were treatment naïve at baseline, socially active or who had loss of libido at baseline. The findings from this study should be interpreted conservatively because of its non-randomized observational design.

Sexual dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia on antipsychotic medication

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia under antipsychotic therapy and to investigate the effect of various parameters on sexual dysfunction.

Method

A total of 827 stabilized outpatients who met DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia, were recruited in the study. Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) and the subscale on sexual function of the UKU Side Effects Rating Scale were applied at a single interview.

Results

In total, 52.6% of the patients had sexual dysfunction, 54.2% reported a low sexual desire and 41.7% reported problems in having an orgasm. Erectile dysfunction and ejaculation problems were seen in 48.1% and 64.2% of the men, respectively; amenorrhea was seen in 24.9% of the women. ASEX score and severity of disease were found to be correlated (p = 0.02). Higher ASEX scores were observed in patients who smoked (p = 0.01). Men receiving atypical monotherapy had lower ASEX scores than those receiving a combination of atypical and conventional antipsychotics (p = 0.017). Patients on combination therapy had more ejaculation problems than the atypical group (p = 0.001). Low sexual desire was more prevalent among women using conventional drugs than those on atypical drugs (p = 0.004). In linear regression analyses, ASEX was affected significantly and independently by the severity of the disease only in men (p = 0.005).

Conclusion

Our results show that sexual dysfunction is widespread among patients with schizophrenia on antipsychotic medications.

In utero exposure to atypical antipsychotic drug, risperidone: Effects on fetal neurotoxicity in hippocampal region and cognitive impairment in rat offspring

Clinical studies indicate that about one-third of pregnant women with psychotic symptoms are exposed to either typical or atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs). Reports on prenatal subject/model are lacking hence, the present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of prenatal exposure to risperidone (RIS) on the fetal hippocampus, and their related functional changes in young rat offspring. In this study, pregnant Wistar rats were exposed to equivalent therapeutic doses of RIS at 0.8mg/kg, 1.0mg/kg, and 2.0mg/kg BW from gestation days (GD) 6 to 20. On GD 21, about half of the pregnant subjects of each group were euthanized, their fetuses were collected, fetal brains dissected, and processed for neurohistopathological evaluation. Remaining pregnant dams were allowed to deliver naturally and reared up to 8weeks of age for neurobehavioral study under selected paradigms of cognition. Our results indicate that there was a significant decrease in the thickness of fetal hippocampus with the disturbed cytoarchitectural pattern, and volume of striatum and choroid plexus was also reduced. Furthermore, RIS treated young rat offspring displayed memory impairment on different mazes of learning and memory. The current study concludes that maternal exposure to clinically relevant doses of RIS may induce neurostructural changes in developing hippocampus and striatum, and cognitive sequelae in young offspring, respectively. Therefore, caution must be taken before prescribing this drug to pregnant subjects, especially during the sensitive phase of brain development. Hence, clinical correlation of animal data is urgently warranted.

Almost all antipsychotics result in weight gain: a meta-analysis

Introduction

Antipsychotics (AP) induce weight gain. However, reviews and meta-analyses generally are restricted to second generation antipsychotics (SGA) and do not stratify for duration of AP use. It is hypothesised that patients gain more weight if duration of AP use is longer.

Method

A meta-analysis was conducted of clinical trials of AP that reported weight change. Outcome measures were body weight change, change in BMI and clinically relevant weight change (7% weight gain or loss). Duration of AP-use was stratified as follows: ≤6 weeks, 6–16 weeks, 16–38 weeks and >38 weeks. Forest plots stratified by AP as well as by duration of use were generated and results were summarised in figures.

Results

307 articles met inclusion criteria. The majority were AP switch studies. Almost all AP showed a degree of weight gain after prolonged use, except for amisulpride, aripiprazole and ziprasidone, for which prolonged exposure resulted in negligible weight change. The level of weight gain per AP varied from discrete to severe. Contrary to expectations, switch of AP did not result in weight loss for amisulpride, aripiprazole or ziprasidone. In AP-naive patients, weight gain was much more pronounced for all AP.

Conclusion

Given prolonged exposure, virtually all AP are associated with weight gain. The rational of switching AP to achieve weight reduction may be overrated. In AP-naive patients, weight gain is more pronounced.

Second-generation and newly approved antipsychotics, serum prolactin levels and sexual dysfunctions: a critical literature review

INTRODUCTION

Using antipsychotic (AP) medication can increase prolactin (PRL) levels and place the patient at risk of sexual dysfunction (SD).

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to describe the PRL propensity of the different second-generation and newly approved APs. It then considers the prevalence rates of SDs associated with these compounds in patients with schizophrenia and treatment strategies for the management of SDs and/or hyperprolactinemia (HPRL). Furthermore, we address the lingering question regarding the association between SDs and PRL.

EXPERT OPINION

SD (particularly long-term) data remain scarce for several APs. A wide variety of assessment techniques used in SD research make reliable comparisons between APs impossible. The majority of these reports do not equally allow us to distinguish between treatment (AP and co-medication)-emergent SDs and illness-related SDs. This makes it difficult to assess the degree to which these side effects are associated with 'PRL-raising' APs, and what part of this fraction is directly reducible to serum PRL levels. Also, few evidence-based treatment strategies for HPRL and associated side effects are available. Therefore, longer-term randomized controlled trials, using reliable and valid structured interviews or questionnaires, are necessary to establish the precise relationship between APs, PRL levels and SDs rates and develop valuable treatment options.

Association between subjective well-being and depressive symptoms in treatment-resistant schizophrenia before and after treatment with clozapine

BACKGROUND

We examined the relationship between subjective well-being and depressive symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia before and after treatment with clozapine to contribute to the growing body of research regarding the determinants of patients' perspective of their own well-being in schizophrenia.

METHODS

Forty patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia were comprehensively evaluated for subjective well-being, schizophrenic symptoms, and depressive symptoms before and 8 weeks after the initiation of treatment with clozapine. Correlation analysis and Fisher's z-transformation statistics were performed.

RESULTS

There were significant improvements in all Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) factor scores and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score over the treatment period (P<.05). Before clozapine administration, the subjective well-being score had significant negative correlations with the PANSS depression factor score (P<.05) and the BDI score (P<.05). After clozapine treatment, the subjective well-being score still had significant negative correlations with the PANSS depression factor score (P<.05) and the BDI score (P<.05) and no new associations emerged with treatment. Fisher's z-transformation statistics revealed that the correlations between the subjective well-being score and the depression score were not significantly different before and after clozapine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that depressive symptoms are significantly associated with low subjective well-being in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The association was equally significant before and after treatment with clozapine, suggesting that the relationship does not change with clozapine treatment, even when depressive symptoms improve significantly, and that there may be a common pathophysiological basis for depressive symptoms and the subjective appraisal of well-being in schizophrenia.

Olanzapine: a 5-year perspective

Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic, approved for the acute and maintenance treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. Despite the publicity regarding reported adverse events with the novel antipsychotics, such as weight gain and Type II diabetes mellitus, olanzapine remains a useful and important medicine. It is a selective monoaminergic antagonist with high-affinity binding to a number of receptors thought to be implicated in some psychotic and mood symptoms. The complex pharmacology of olanzapine has lead to studies exploring its use in treating substance abuse, aggression/violence, borderline personality disorder, schizotypal personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and as a neuroprotective agent in schizophrenia. As the pharmacology of olanzapine and other novel antipsychotics becomes better understood, future effective treatment strategies are likely to match an individual's genetic makeup and receptor profiles to the most compatible agent.

Weight change by baseline BMI from three-year observational data: findings from the Worldwide Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes Database

The aim was to explore weight and body mass index (BMI) changes by baseline BMI in patients completing three years of monotherapy with various first- and second-generation antipsychotics in a large cohort in a post hoc analysis of three-year observational data. Data were analyzed by antipsychotic and three baseline BMI bands: underweight/normal weight (BMI <25 kg/m²), overweight (25-30 kg/m²) and obese (>30 kg/m²). Baseline BMI was associated with subsequent weight change irrespective of the antipsychotic given. Specifically, a smaller proportion of patients gained ≥7% baseline bodyweight, and a greater proportion of patients lost ≥7% baseline bodyweight with increasing baseline BMI. For olanzapine (the antipsychotic associated with highest mean weight gain in the total drug cohort), the percentage of patients gaining ≥7% baseline weight was 45% (95% CI: 43-48) in the underweight/normal weight BMI cohort and 20% (95% CI: 15-27) in the obese BMI cohort; 7% (95% CI: 6-8) of the underweight/normal cohort and 19% (95% CI: 13-27) of the obese cohort lost ≥7% baseline weight. BMI has an association with the likelihood of weight gain or loss and should be considered in analyses of antipsychotic weight change.

Clinical consequences of switching from olanzapine to risperidone and vice versa in outpatients with schizophrenia: 36-month results from the Worldwide Schizophrenia Outpatients Health Outcomes (W-SOHO) study

BACKGROUND

With many atypical antipsychotics now available in the market, it has become a common clinical practice to switch between atypical agents as a means of achieving the best clinical outcomes. This study aimed to examine the impact of switching from olanzapine to risperidone and vice versa on clinical status and tolerability outcomes in outpatients with schizophrenia in a naturalistic setting.

METHODS

W-SOHO was a 3-year observational study that involved over 17,000 outpatients with schizophrenia from 37 countries worldwide. The present post hoc study focused on the subgroup of patients who started taking olanzapine at baseline and subsequently made the first switch to risperidone (n=162) and vice versa (n=136). Clinical status was assessed at the visit when the first switch was made (i.e. before switching) and after switching. Logistic regression models examined the impact of medication switch on tolerability outcomes, and linear regression models assessed the association between medication switch and change in the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH) overall score or change in weight. In addition, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox-proportional hazards models were used to analyze the time to medication switch as well as time to relapse (symptom worsening as assessed by the CGI-SCH scale or hospitalization).

RESULTS

48% and 39% of patients switching to olanzapine and risperidone, respectively, remained on the medication without further switches (p=0.019). Patients switching to olanzapine were significantly less likely to experience relapse (hazard ratio: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.43, 8.26), extrapyramidal symptoms (odds ratio [OR]: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.49, 10.89) and amenorrhea/galactorrhea (OR: 8.99, 95% CI: 2.30, 35.13). No significant difference in weight change was, however, found between the two groups. While the CGI-SCH overall score improved in both groups after switching, there was a significantly greater change in those who switched to olanzapine (difference of 0.29 points, p=0.013).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that patients who switched from risperidone to olanzapine were likely to experience a more favorable treatment course than those who switched from olanzapine to risperidone. Given the nature of observational study design and small sample size, additional studies are warranted.

Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes study: twelve-month findings

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the 12-month outcomes associated with naturalistic antipsychotic treatment of patients participating in the Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study.

METHODS

SOHO is a 3-year, prospective, observational study of the health outcomes associated with antipsychotic treatment in 10 European countries. The study included over 10,000 outpatients who were initiating or changing their antipsychotic medication. Medication use pattern, change in symptom severity, social functioning, and health-related quality of life were assessed, as well as rates of response, remission, treatment discontinuation, adverse events, and hospitalization.

RESULTS

Clinical Global Impression-Severity for Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH) and quality of life scores improved in all treatment cohorts. There were greater improvements in the CGI-SCH overall symptom score and in the CGI-SCH positive, negative, cognitive, and depressive symptom scores in the olanzapine and clozapine cohorts compared with other treatment cohorts. Changes were associated with an improvement in quality of life. Patients treated with olanzapine, quetiapine, and clozapine had better tolerability per extrapyramidal symptoms and sexual-related dysfunction measures compared with patients receiving risperidone, amisulpride, or typicals. Patients treated with olanzapine had greater weight gain than patients in all other treatment cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Patients initiated on olanzapine and clozapine tend to have better outcomes at 12 months than patients initiated on other antipsychotics in routine outpatient clinical practice. Results should be interpreted conservatively due to the nonrandomized study design.

Sexual function of patients with schizophrenia receiving first-generation (FGA) or second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) treatment

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate sexual function in patients with schizophrenia receiving treatment with a first-generation antipsychotic (FGA) or a second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) drug. Sexual function is an important aspect of human experience, which can be affected by antipsychotic drug treatment. Sexual dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia may be less prevalent with SGA than with FGA drug treatment.

METHODS

A cross-sectional prevalence study assessed sexual function in a sample of 144 patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia aged between 18 and 65, using the Derogatis Interview for Sexual Functioning (self-report version: DISF-SR). Two equal-sized groups (N = 72) received treatment with an FGA or an SGA drug for at least 12 weeks.

RESULTS

No significant differences were seen on DISF-SR total score or subscale score between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no differences in measured sexual function of non-randomised patients with schizophrenia treated with an FGA compared with SGA-treated patients.

Strategies for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced sexual dysfunction and/or hyperprolactinemia among patients of the schizophrenia spectrum: a review

There is limited evidence for the management of sexual dysfunction and/or hyperprolactinemia resulting from use of antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia and spectrum. The aim of this study was to review and describe the strategies for the treatment of antipsychotic-induced sexual dysfunctions and/or hyperprolactinemia. The research was carried out through Medline/PubMed, Cochrane, Lilacs, Embase, and PsycINFO, and it included open labels or randomized clinical trials. The authors found 31 studies: 25 open-label noncontrolled studies and 6 randomized controlled clinical trials. The randomized, double-blind controlled studies that were conducted with adjunctive treatment that showed improvement of sexual dysfunction and/or decrease of prolactin levels were sildenafil and aripiprazole. The medication selegiline and cyproheptadine did not improve sexual function. The switch to quetiapine was demonstrated in 2 randomized controlled studies: 1 showed improvement in the primary outcome and the other did not. This reviewed data have suggested that further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to provide evidence for the effects of different strategies to manage sexual dysfunction and/or hyperprolactinaemia resulting from antipsychotics. These trials are necessary in order to have a better compliance and reduce the distress among patients with schizophrenia.

Social interaction and drug attitude effectiveness in patients with schizophrenia

This study aimed to explore the relationship between dosage of paliperidone and drug attitude, and also clarify the factors associated with drug attitude, using Intention-to-Treat (ITT) analysis. Three hundred thirty-one patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, who prescribed paliperidone between April 2008 and April 2009, from 10 hospitals in Taiwan were enrolled. By structural equation modeling, inpatient/outpatient status associated with occupation status, sex, and score on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGIS) Scale. The score on the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale associated with occupation status, inpatient/outpatient status, and the score on the CGIS Scale. The scores on the DAI-10 associated with the score on the PSP Scale and age. Good drug attitude and medication adherence significantly related to good social interaction. We should enhance the drug attitude and medication adherence of patients with schizophrenia who have poor social interaction to improve the outcome of schizophrenia.

Second generation antipsychotics improve sexual dysfunction in schizophrenia: a randomised controlled trial

The impact of antipsychotic drug treatment on sexual function was investigated during a randomised trial comparing first generation antipsychotics (FGAs) to (nonclozapine) second generation antipsychotics (SGAs). Sexual function and quality of life were (rater-blind) assessed in 42 patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia (aged 18-65) using the self-report version of the Derogatis Interview for Sexual Function (DISF-SR) and the Heinrichs Quality of Life Scale (QLS), prior to, and 12 weeks following, a change in medication from an FGA drug to either an FGA or SGA drug. SGAs significantly improved sexual function compared to FGAs. Change in sexual function was associated with change in quality of life. Where impaired sexual functioning is a distressing adverse effect of treatment with an FGA agent, consideration should be given to switching to an SGA.

Tolerability of outpatient antipsychotic treatment: 36-month results from the European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study

SOHO is a 3-year, prospective, observational study of schizophrenia patients who started a new antipsychotic in 10 European countries. Cohorts of patients were defined according to the antipsychotic started at baseline: olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, amisulpride, clozapine, oral typical and depot typical antipsychotics. Tolerability in terms of rates of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), tardive dyskinesia (TD), anticholinergic use, loss of libido/impotence, amenorrhoea/galactorrhoea/gynaecomastia, and weight change was assessed in 4939 patients who started monotherapy. Logistic regression models related medication initiated at study entry to adverse events over follow-up, adjusting by baseline differences among treatment cohorts. Patients taking typical antipsychotics or risperidone were more likely to experience EPS and TD during follow-up than patients taking olanzapine. Patients taking olanzapine were less likely to have loss of libido/impotence during follow-up than patients in the risperidone, amisulpride, clozapine, oral typical and depot typical cohorts. Weight gain occurred in all groups, but was greater with olanzapine. In conclusion, antipsychotics have different tolerability profiles in terms of the adverse events we monitored. Results should be interpreted conservatively due to the observational study design.

Obesity, serious mental illness and antipsychotic drugs

The prevalence of overweight and obesity is higher in people with mental illness than in the general population. Body weight is tightly regulated by a complex system involving the cortex and limbic system, the hypothalamus and the gastrointestinal tract. While there are justifiable concerns about the weight gain associated with antipsychotic medication, it is too simplistic to ascribe all obesity in people with serious mental illness (SMI) to their drug treatment. The development of obesity in SMI results from the complex interaction of the genotype and environment of the person with mental illness, the mental illness itself and antipsychotic medication. There are dysfunctional reward mechanisms in SMI that may contribute to poor food choices and overeating. While it is clear that antipsychotics have profound effects to stimulate appetite, no one receptor interaction provides an adequate explanation for this effect, and many mechanisms are likely to be involved. The complexity of the system regulating body weight allows us to start to understand why some individuals appear much more prone to weight gain and obesity than others.

Antipsychotic treatment discontinuation in previously untreated patients with schizophrenia: 36-month results from the SOHO study

Data from the 3-year, prospective, observational SOHO study were used to compare the effectiveness (in terms of treatment discontinuation) and the tolerability of olanzapine, risperidone, other atypicals and typical antipsychotics in 1009 previously untreated outpatients with schizophrenia who started monotherapy at baseline. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis estimated the time to treatment discontinuation by the treatment group, Cox proportional hazards regression models identified the variables associated with treatment discontinuation (adjusted for baseline differences between treatment groups), and logistic regression models compared the tolerability profiles of the different treatment groups. Of the 931 patients analyzed, 31.9% discontinued the medication initiated at baseline during the 3-year follow-up. Olanzapine had the lowest rate of discontinuation (28.9%), followed by other atypical (34.0%), risperidone (36.2%) and typical antipsychotics (44.5%). Compared to olanzapine, risk of treatment discontinuation was higher with typical antipsychotics (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11, 2.78) or risperidone (HR 1.36; 95% CI 1.02, 1.82). A higher baseline Clinical Global Impression (CGI) positive score was associated with a higher risk of treatment discontinuation (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.06, 1.30). Olanzapine was associated with a lower frequency of extrapyramidal symptoms than other antipsychotics, fewer prolactin-related adverse events than risperidone and other atypical antipsychotics, but greater weight gain than typicals and risperidone. For all analyses, comparison with the other atypical group is limited due to its small sample size (n=50). In conclusion, treatment effectiveness and tolerability varied among antipsychotic medications in previously untreated patients with schizophrenia. The results should be interpreted conservatively given the observational study design.

Update on the management of symptoms in schizophrenia: focus on amisulpride

Amisulpride is an atypical antipsychotic drug with a unique receptor pharmacology which is dose dependent. It is a standard treatment in dysthymia as well as in psychosis. Amisulpride is efficacious, effective and well tolerated in positive symptoms of schizophrenia: there is extensive evidence that it treats negative symptoms when given in low doses, although relative lack of EPS and an antidepressant effect may contribute. In first-episode patients amisulpride is an option, although there is little comparative work available. Amisulpride has the best evidence as an effective adjunct to clozapine treatment. Regarding intellectual function, amisulpride appears cognitive sparing but the clinical relevance of this remains obscure. There is evidence that amisulpride can improve social function but again there is little comparative work to demonstrate any particular advantages. Regarding the current conventional versus atypical antipsychotic controversy, amisulpride did better in switching studies and meta-analyses than in the single large pragmatic randomized trial reported to date. It is a versatile drug, and may offer advantages over other atypical antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of negative and depressive symptoms, and tolerability advantages such as the avoidance of weight gain. Essentially it rests with the treating clinician to employ a rational psychopharmacological approach towards the individual patient: there will be few circumstances in which amisulpride will not be a likely contender as a treatment choice.

Weight management in a cohort of Irish inpatients with serious mental illness (SMI) using a modular behavioural programme. A preliminary service evaluation

BACKGROUND

Weight gain is commonly observed during psychotropic treatments for chronic forms of severe mental illness and is most rapid during the early treatment phases. All formats of behavioural weight intervention programmes have suggested that weight gain can be prevented or reversed in some patients. There is no data on these programmes in acutely unwell inpatients whom may be the major beneficiaries.

METHODS

A modular behavioural intervention programme (Solutions for Wellness) used in SMI outpatients since 2002 in Ireland has been adapted for inpatient use. Preliminary data is reported from 5 centres in Ireland.

RESULTS

In 47 inpatients the mean weight change was +0.26 kg (SD 2.02) with a median change of 0 kg. Mean follow-up was 23.7 (SD 21.6) days, and median 14 days (range 6-98 days). There was no difference in mean weight change in those patients involved for > 35 days compared with < 35 days (+0.26 kg; 0.25 kg; p = 0.5). Weight loss or maintenance was seen in 70% of patients.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary data are supportive of the concept that acutely unwell inpatients with SMI may engage with a behavioural weight programme. Weight change observed contrasts with the significant weight gain often seen in most subjects. Further clinical trials are warranted.

Decreased levels of ghrelin, cortisol, and fasting blood sugar, but not n-octanoylated ghrelin, in Japanese schizophrenic inpatients treated with olanzapine

The mechanism by which chronic administration of olanzapine induces a marked weight gain in patients with schizophrenia remains unknown. We examined the influence of long-term treatment with olanzapine on plasma levels of hormones regulating food intake and energy homeostasis in schizophrenia. In this study, olanzapine was administered to 28 Japanese inpatients for 16 weeks after switching from typical antipsychotic drugs or risperidone. At endpoint, no significant changes in body weight or body mass index were found. There was a significant decrease in the plasma levels of ghrelin without any accompanying change in active, n-octanoylated ghrelin. Serum levels of leptin tended to be increased and a significant reduction in plasma cortisol levels was found. In addition, the levels of fasting blood sugar as well as free fatty acid were significantly decreased. Furthermore, we did not confirm any marked weight gain induced by chronic administration of olanzapine as previously reported. The reason for this discrepancy may be due to differences in subjects and treatment settings. Based on these findings, it is unlikely that the decrease in plasma ghrelin levels by chronic administration of olanzapine affects weight gain. Further studies examining the effect of chronic olanzapine administration on weight and energy homeostasis in inpatients are required.

Clinical consequences of switching antipsychotic drugs in outpatients with schizophrenia: 36-month results from the European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes study

Data from the European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes, a 3-year, prospective, observational study of health outcomes associated with antipsychotic treatment in outpatients with schizophrenia (n=10 972 enrolled), were used to assess the impact of the first switching of antipsychotic medications, with a focus on olanzapine, on clinical status and tolerability outcomes. Patients were defined as those who (1) started olanzapine at baseline and changed treatment; (2) started another antipsychotic at baseline and changed to olanzapine; and (3) changed from and to a non-olanzapine antipsychotic. A logistic regression model was used to analyse the impact of switching on treatment response and tolerability. Patients switching from olanzapine were less likely to respond than patients switching to olanzapine (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.40, 0.87). Patients who switched from olanzapine and those who switched neither from nor to olanzapine were more likely to have extrapyramidal symptoms (OR: 3.79; 95% CI: 2.02, 7.10 and OR: 2.18; 95% CI: 1.23, 3.86, respectively) and loss of libido (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.21, 2.96 and OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.04, 2.35, respectively) compared with patients who switched from another antipsychotic to olanzapine. Patients who switched to olanzapine experienced a higher weight gain. In conclusion, among patients switching antipsychotic medication, those who switched to olanzapine had better long-term outcomes.

Long-term, naturalistic treatment with olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or haloperidol monotherapy: 24-month results from the Intercontinental Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (IC-SOHO) study

Objective. To compare the effectiveness of olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or haloperidol monotherapy in patients with schizophrenia who were treated in routine clinical practice settings for a period of 2 years. The incidence and persistence of adverse events encountered during long-term therapy are also reported. Method. Outpatients with schizophrenia who entered this 3-year, prospective, observational study were classified according to their initially prescribed antipsychotic monotherapy: olanzapine (n=3222), risperidone (n=1116), quetiapine (n=189), or haloperidol (n=256). Patients were included in the analysis for as long as this treatment was maintained. Results. Over 2 years, olanzapine recipients had significantly (P≤0.001) greater reduction in overall CGI-S score (and the negative, depressive, and cognitive symptoms domains), lower incidence of sexual and motor dysfunction, and greater odds of response compared to risperidone or haloperidol-treated patients. However, olanzapine patients gained more weight than patients in other treatment groups. The incidence of motor dysfunction was significantly (P≤0.001) greater in haloperidol-treated patients, relative to the atypical treatment groups. Conclusion. The results of this observational study indicate that, in these patients with schizophrenia, long-term monotherapy with olanzapine may offer benefits over risperidone and haloperidol, but the potential for weight gain should be considered in the clinical management of these patients.

Five-year follow-up during antipsychotic treatment: efficacy, safety, functional and social outcome

OBJECTIVE

Explore the long-term course of schizophrenia and related disorders.

METHOD

Naturalistic study of 225 patients initially treated with risperidone (monotherapy or in combination with other psychotropic drugs) over 5 years.

RESULTS

Stable symptomatology and side effects were observed. Clinician GAF scores were 55-61, but patients' self-ratings were higher. Clinician and patient CGI scores were at the same level. Annual in-patient days decreased but days in sheltered accommodations increased still more. Only 12% of the patients studied or worked full-time. One in four had no social contacts except with staff. Eight patients died during the 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The findings underline the chronicity and seriousness of psychotic disorders in terms of social outcome and, indirectly, the low quality of life of this group of persons. Patients were generally well aware of their illness and able to sort out symptoms from drug side effects. This opens for more active involvement of patients in monitoring their own treatment.

Low dose quetiapine induced galactorrhoea: a case report

BACKGROUND

Quetiapine causes less prolactin elevation and/or galactorrhoea than other atypical antipsychotics.

CASE PRESENTATION

Ms AB had galactorrhoea and raised prolactin levels at only 100 mg of quetiapine daily.

CONCLUSION

Low dose quetiapine can also cause galactorrhoea.

Long-term maintenance of weight loss in patients with severe mental illness through a behavioural treatment programme in the UK

OBJECTIVE

Obesity is common among people with severe mental illness (SMI). We report our experience from the first 4 years of The Cromwell House weight management clinic.

METHOD

Ninety-three patients with SMI aged 43.7 +/- 1.2 years referred themselves to this clinic. The patients were seen in weekly group sessions that involved weight measurement, discussion and education.

RESULTS

Mean baseline weight was 89.5 +/- 1.8 kg [body mass index (BMI) 32.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2)]. Twenty-three per cent dropped out within the first 8 weeks. There was progressive statistically significant reduction in mean weight and BMI throughout the duration of monitoring with no suggestion of a plateau. The mean final weight loss was 6.2 +/- 0.6 kg. Weight loss was correlated only with the number of sessions attended (r = 0.53, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Long-term weight management of obese and overweight patients with severe forms of mental illness was possible through the provision of simple lifestyle advice within the group setting.

Three-year antipsychotic effectiveness in the outpatient care of schizophrenia: observational versus randomized studies results

Antipsychotic discontinuation rates are a powerful indicator of medication effectiveness in schizophrenia. We examined antipsychotic discontinuation in the Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes (SOHO) study, a 3-year prospective, observational study in outpatients with schizophrenia in 10 European countries. Patients (n=7728) who started antipsychotic monotherapy were analyzed. Medication discontinuation for any cause ranged from 34% and 36% for clozapine and olanzapine, respectively, to 66% for quetiapine. Compared to olanzapine, the risk of treatment discontinuation before 36 months was significantly higher for quetiapine, risperidone, amisulpride, and typical antipsychotics (oral and depot), but similar for clozapine. Longer medication maintenance was associated with being socially active and having a longer time since first treatment contact for schizophrenia, whereas higher symptom severity, treatment with mood stabilizers, substance abuse, having hostile behaviour were associated with lower medication maintenance. Antipsychotic maintenance in SOHO was higher than the results of previous randomized studies.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sibutramine for clozapine-associated weight gain

This study sought to examine the effectiveness of sibutramine, a weight loss agent, on clozapine-associated weight gain.

METHOD

This was a 12-week double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized trial of sibutramine for weight loss in obese clozapine-treated schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder subjects.

RESULTS

Ten patients were enrolled into the placebo group and 11 patients into the sibutramine group. There were no significant baseline differences between the two groups on age, gender, education, ethnicity, diagnosis, weight, body mass index (BMI), and blood pressure. At week 12, there were no significant differences in changes in weight, BMI, abdominal and waist circumferences, Hba1c, fasting glucose, or cholesterol levels.

CONCLUSION

Sibutramine treatment did not show significant weight loss compared with placebo in clozapine-treated patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Further research with a larger sample size and longer follow-up duration is warranted.

The "Seroquel" Outcomes Study (SOS): Efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in a long-term, naturalistic study of patients with schizophrenia

Objective. The "Seroquel" Outcomes Study (SOS) aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in patients with schizophrenia in the clinical practice setting. Methods. A 6-month, non-comparative, open-label study in adults with schizophrenia in a standard care setting in Spain. Outpatients received flexibly dosed quetiapine. Efficacy was evaluated using the Brief Psychiatry Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. BPRS response was defined as≥30% decrease from baseline. Tolerability was assessed using the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) and a modified Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) side-effects scale. Results. A total of 2029 patients enrolled. Significant changes from baseline to Month 6 were recorded for BPRS total and subscale scores (P<0.001). Compared with doses of≥600 mg/day, doses of<400 mg/day were a strong predictor of a lower response rate (OR 0.62; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.82) and higher withdrawal rate (OR 3.3; 95% CI: 2.5, 4.4). Mean change in weight was minimal (+0.4 kg). Somnolence (26.7%), asthenia (12.5%), and constipation (9.8%) were the most common adverse events. Conclusion. Quetiapine was found to improve symptoms of schizophrenia, as indicated by a significant decrease in BPRS scores, and was well tolerated by patients in clinical practice.

Lower weight gain with the orally disintegrating olanzapine than with standard tablets in first-episode never treated psychotic patients

OBJECTIVE

A post-hoc analysis of the data from a randomised clinical trial involving prescription of antipsychotic treatment to never treated first-onset psychotic patients was used to compare the weight change after 6-week olanzapine treatment (standard tablets vs. orally disintegrating formulation).

METHOD

In the subgroup of 38 patients randomised to olanzapine, standard olanzapine tablets were non-randomly and consecutively prescribed to the first 19 patients, with the orally disintegrating formulation being prescribed to the following 19 patients.

RESULTS

After 6-week treatment with olanzapine, a significant higher increase in weight was noted in those patients on standard tablets (mean weight increase 6.3 +/- 1.9 Kg) as compared to those on orally disintegrating olanzapine (mean weight increase 3.3 +/- 3.2 Kg) (F = 7.7; p = 0.009). BMI increase was also significantly higher in the olanzapine tablet group (mean increase of 2.1 Kg/m(2) as compared with 1.1 Kg/m(2) in the orally disintegrating group) (F = 4.7; p = 0.036). Substantial weight gain (SWG) (> or =7% increase from baseline weight) was noted in 84.2% (n = 16) of the olanzapine tablet patients and in 31.6% (n = 6) of the orally disintegrating olanzapine patients, with the olanzapine tablet group showing a significant increase in the mean percentage of weight gain (F = 4.0; p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial sublingual absorption occurring with orally disintegrating olanzapine may bypass gastrointestinal metabolisation and hence lead to differences in metabolite versus parent compound ratios. However, the need arises to replicate the present study with a longer follow-up.

Quetiapine in anorexia nervosa patients: an open label outpatient pilot study

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of the study was to determine whether quetiapine was effective in reducing scores on the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) in anorexia nervosa (AN) patients. Secondary objectives included determining whether quetiapine was effective in reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression. In addition, the effect on weight was determined.

METHOD

In an open label design, 19 patients with AN but without schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were given 150-300 mg quetiapine daily over a 10 week period. Results were analyzed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients completed the study and all but one of the 5 patients who dropped out returned for an early termination visit. Scores on the total, general psychopathology, and depression scales of the PANSS declined significantly (p = .024, .010, .0005, respectively) at LOCF. There were improvements in several measures of anxiety, depression, and obsessive compulsive symptoms. Mean weight gain was modest at 1.6 lbs (0.73 kg). Adverse events were generally mild and no patients discontinued due to adverse events

CONCLUSION

Quetiapine was well-tolerated and patients had significant improvements in several subscales of the PANSS as well as decreases in measures of anxiety and depression.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Atypical Antipsychotics

In the past, the information about the dose-clinical effectiveness of typical antipsychotics was not complete and this led to the risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. This, together with the intention of improving patients' quality of life and therapeutic compliance, resulted in the development of atypical or second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). This review will concentrate on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, amisulpride, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and sertindole, and will discuss the main aspects of their pharmacodynamics. In psychopharmacology, therapeutic drug monitoring studies have generally concentrated on controlling compliance and avoiding adverse effects by keeping long-term exposure to the minimal effective blood concentration. The rationale for using therapeutic drug monitoring in relation to SGAs is still a matter of debate, but there is growing evidence that it can improve efficacy, especially when patients do not respond to therapeutic doses or when they develop adverse effects. Here, we review the literature concerning the relationships between plasma concentrations of SGAs and clinical responses by dividing the studies on the basis of the length of their observation periods. Studies with clozapine evidenced a positive relationship between plasma concentrations and clinical response, with a threshold of 350-420 ng/mL associated with good clinical response. The usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring is well established because high plasma concentrations of clozapine can increase the risk of epileptic seizures. Plasma clozapine concentrations seem to be influenced by many factors such as altered cytochrome P450 1A4 activity, age, sex and smoking. The pharmacological effects of risperidone depend on the sum of the plasma concentrations of risperidone and its 9-hydroxyrisperidone metabolite, so monitoring the plasma concentrations of the parent compound alone can lead to erroneous interpretations. Despite a large variability in plasma drug concentrations, the lack of studies using fixed dosages, and discrepancies in the results, it seems that monitoring the plasma concentrations of the active moiety may be useful. However, no therapeutic plasma concentration range for risperidone has yet been clearly established. A plasma threshold concentration for parkinsonian side effects has been found to be 74 ng/mL. Moreover, therapeutic drug monitoring may be particularly useful in the switch between the oral and the long-acting injectable form. The reviewed studies on olanzapine strongly indicate a relationship between clinical outcomes and plasma concentrations. Olanzapine therapeutic drug monitoring can be considered very useful in assessing therapeutic efficacy and controlling adverse events. A therapeutic range of 20-50 ng/mL has been found. There is little evidence in favour of the existence of a relationship between plasma quetiapine concentrations and clinical responses, and an optimal therapeutic range has not been identified. Positron emission tomography studies of receptor blockade indicated a discrepancy between the time course of receptor occupancy and plasma quetiapine concentrations. The value of quetiapine plasma concentration monitoring in clinical practice is still controversial. Preliminary data suggested that a therapeutic plasma amisulpride concentration of 367 ng/mL was associated with clinical improvement. A therapeutic range of 100-400 ng/mL is proposed from non-systematic clinical experience. There is no direct evidence concerning optimal plasma concentration ranges of ziprasidone, aripiprazole or sertindole.

Remission and relapse in the outpatient care of schizophrenia: three-year results from the Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes study

Remission and relapse are clinical outcomes of increasing interest in schizophrenia. We analyzed remission and relapse, and the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with these outcomes, in the usual care of schizophrenia using the 3-year, follow-up data from a large cohort of outpatients with schizophrenia taking part in the prospective, observational, European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes study. Of the 6516 patients analyzed for remission, 4206 (64.6%) achieved remission during the 3-year, follow-up period. Logistic regression analysis revealed that being female, having a good level of social functioning at study entry, and a shorter duration of illness were factors significantly associated with achieving remission. Treatment with olanzapine was also associated with a higher frequency of remission compared with other antipsychotic agents. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve estimated that relapse occurred in approximately 25% of the patients who achieved remission, with the risk of relapse remaining constant during the follow-up period. Shorter duration of illness, having hostile behaviors, and substance abuse were factors associated with a higher risk of relapse, whereas good level of social functioning and the use of olanzapine and clozapine were associated with a lower risk of relapse. In conclusion, the 3-year results of the Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes study indicate that the likelihood of remission decreases over the longitudinal course of schizophrenia, but risk of relapse is maintained even after 3 years of achieving remission severity levels. Results suggest that treatment with olanzapine is associated with a better chance of achieving remission than other antipsychotics. Moreover, the use of olanzapine and clozapine is associated with a lower risk of relapse compared with risperidone, quetiapine, and typical antipsychotics. The results should be interpreted conservatively because of the observational, nonrandomized study design.

Cost-effectiveness of different clinical interventions for reducing the burden of schizophrenia in Spain

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of interventions for reducing the burden of schizophrenia in Spain.

METHOD

The study examined the cost-effectiveness of seven different types of clinical interventions at the level of Spanish population: i) current situation; ii) older antipsychotics alone; iii) new antipsychotics alone (risperidone); iv) older antipsychotics plus psychosocial treatment; v) new antipsychotics plus psychosocial treatment; vi) older antipsychotics plus case management and psychosocial treatment; vii) new antipsychotics plus case management and psychosocial treatment.

RESULTS

Interventions based on the combination of haloperidol with psychosocial treatment or psychosocial treatment plus case management proved to be the most efficient strategies.

CONCLUSION

The relatively modest additional cost of concurrent psychosocial treatment has significant health gains, thereby making such a combined strategy for schizophrenia more cost-effective than pharmacology alone.

Early changes of plasma lipids during treatment with atypical antipsychotics

Metabolic side effects have been found earlier during treatment with second-generation antipsychotics. Among those disturbances serum lipids are less investigated. We conducted a prospective, open study in schizophrenia patients in order to compare body weight and serum lipids during treatment with amisulpride, ziprasidone, clozapine or olanzapine over a period of 4 weeks. Body mass index, total cholesterol and triglycerides increased in patients treated with clozapine and olanzapine whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased in those patients. In patients treated with amisulpride or ziprasidone, we found a decrease in body mass index and total cholesterol whereas high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased. Our results indicate that treatment with ziprasidone and amisulpride is more favourable than treatment with clozapine and olanzapine with respect to the risk to induce weight gain and hyperlipidaemia. These results are important with regard to the increased risk for cardiovascular complications in patients with schizophrenia.

Shared decision making for in-patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Patients' participation in treatment planning is being increasingly advocated in mental health. The model of "Shared Decision Making" (SDM) is proposed as a promising method of engaging patients in medical decisions and improving health-related outcomes. In the present study, the feasibility and effects of SDM for in-patients with schizophrenia should be evaluated.

METHOD

Randomized controlled trial comparing a SDM program with routine care (n = 107).

RESULTS

The intervention studied was feasible for most of the patients and did not take up more of the doctors' time. Patients in the intervention group had a better knowledge about their disease (P = 0.01) and a higher perceived involvement in medical decisions (P = 0.03). The intervention increased the uptake of psychoeducation (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Sharing medical decisions with acutely ill in-patients with schizophrenia is in many cases possible and improves important treatment patterns. This might help in destigmatizing this group of patients and improving schizophrenia-related health outcomes.

The SOHO (Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcome) study: implications for the treatment of schizophrenia

The European SOHO (Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcome) study is an observational, naturalistic study of the outpatient treatment of schizophrenia. The patient recruitment and assessment began in September 2000 and finished in early 2005. A total of 10 972 adult patients from ten European countries who were initiating or changing antipsychotic medication for the treatment of schizophrenia within the normal course of care have been enrolled. The patients have been followed at regular intervals over the 3-year timeframe of the study. Evaluation includes clinical severity, measured with the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale; health-related quality of life; social functioning; and medication tolerability. The 6- and 12-month results have been published so far and have demonstrated that the patients in whom treatment was initiated with olanzapine or clozapine or who were started on more than one antipsychotic of any class at baseline tended to have somewhat greater improvement than patients treated with other atypical or typical antipsychotics, both in terms of symptoms measured with the CGI and quality of life. Numbers of social contacts increased with the treatment, but other aspects of social functioning did not show any significant change. Atypical antipsychotics as a class were associated with a lower frequency of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and anticholinergic use than typical antipsychotics. The frequency of EPS was lowest in the clozapine-, quetiapine- and olanzapine-treated patients, at around 10%. The atypical antipsychotics also conferred a lower risk for tardive dyskinesia than the typical antipsychotics. Weight gain occurred in all treatment cohorts over the first 12 months of treatment and was statistically significantly greater in the patients who started treatment with olanzapine and clozapine. Prolactin- and sexually-related adverse events were frequent at baseline assessment: amenorrhoea was present in around one- third of women, impotence in around 40% of men, and loss of libido in 50% of both male and female patients. Patients treated with olanzapine, clozapine and quetiapine were significantly less likely to have sexual/endocrine-related dysfunctions after 6 months of treatment (the 12-month results of this parameter are yet to be published) than those in the other treatment cohorts (typical antipsychotics, risperidone and amisulpride). Concomitant medication use during the study has been high, ranging from 5% to 29% for anticholinergics, 8% to 23% for antidepressants, 22% to 37% for anxiolytics and 7% to 19% for mood stabilisers, depending on the type of antipsychotic prescribed. Fewer olanzapine-, quetiapine- and clozapine-treated patients used concomitant anticholinergics or anxiolytics/hypnotics. The current results from the SOHO study indicate that differences in effectiveness and tolerability do exist between the antipsychotics. Future results from the study will be published during the coming months and years, and will allow patterns of antipsychotic use in routine clinical practice (including how often and why changes are made) to be determined. This important information is likely to impact on the future use of antipsychotics and will assist clinicians in refining the use of these drugs and improving the outcome of patients to whom they are prescribed.

Antipsychotic drugs and diabetes--an application of the Austin Bradford Hill criteria

There is concern that antipsychotic drugs cause diabetes. Although there has been an explosion in the quantity of literature about this subject, it remains confusing and inconsistent. To assess whether the association between antipsychotic drugs and diabetes is causative, we applied the Austin Bradford Hill criteria to the available evidence. In support of a causative relationship, there is temporality for some cases of diabetes, and there is a biologically plausible explanation. The causative link between antipsychotic drugs and diabetes is coherent with our understanding of diabetes and there are other analogies. However the strength of association is weak, there is lack of consistency or specificity, and there is little evidence to support a biological gradient. We should therefore conclude that the evidence surrounding a causative link between antipsychotic drugs and diabetes is inconclusive. Moreover, the risk is probably low and the attributable risk of developing diabetes is greater for traditional risk factors such as family history, ethnicity, obesity and ageing than it is for receiving an antipsychotic drug. Consequently, the majority of patients receiving second-generation antipsychotics will not develop diabetes as a result of their medication.

The impact of subjective well-being under neuroleptic treatment on compliance and remission

The patients' perspective of antipsychotic treatment was largely neglected for a long period. It has only been during the last 10 years, with the development of atypical antipsychotics, that scientific interest in this issue has markedly increased. Numerous studies have shown that the majority of schizophrenic patients are able to fill out a self-rating scale in a meaningful way, and several self-report scales with sufficient internal consistency and good construct validity have been developed. The effects of antipsychotic treatment on psychopathology and on subjective well-being (SW) are not strongly related; the perspectives of the patient and his/her psychiatrist markedly differ. Recent research indicates that SW/quality of life, much more improved by atypical than by typical antipsychotics, has a strong impact on compliance, as well as on the chance of achieving remission. The data strongly suggest that a systematic evaluation of the patient's perspective of antipsychotic treatment is meaningful and necessary to increase compliance, functional outcome, and long-term prognosis.

Treatment of schizophrenia patients: comparing new-generation antipsychotics to each other

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although the debate on whether new antipsychotics have advantages over the old neuroleptics has recently been refueled by the first publication of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness results, one of the new challenges in the pharmacological management of schizophrenia patients is to choose among the new-generation drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Earlier work has compared these medications primarily to traditional antipsychotics and until very recently there was little published information on the relative efficacy/safety of new-generation antipsychotics.

SUMMARY

This review covers studies wherein therapeutic effects and adverse events of these drugs in schizophrenia patients were compared in head-to-head studies and that were published in 2005. Information is clearly more homogenous on the safety profile side, while the available evidence still offers little help for the clinicians' daily struggles to find the optimally effective antipsychotic for an individual schizophrenia patient.

Subjective response to clozapine and risperidone treatment in outpatients with schizophrenia

The purpose of the present study was to compare the subjective response and attitude towards antipsychotic treatment between schizophrenic patients receiving clozapine and those receiving risperidone. Ninety-four outpatients who had been on a stable drug dosage were evaluated (clozapine group: n=57, mean dose=254.1 mg/day; risperidone group: n=37, mean dose=3.0 mg/day). Subjective response to antipsychotic treatment was assessed using the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI). The two treatment groups had a positive total mean score, indicating that both groups had a positive subjective view of drug treatment. The proportion of subjects who had a positive total score was not different between the two groups. In subscale scores, multivariate analysis revealed that clozapine group tended to have a higher score on the subjective positive response subscale (P=0.06). The scores of subjective negative response or attitude to medication subscales were not different between groups. In conclusion, there was no marked difference between stabilized outpatients taking clozapine and risperidone in terms of subjective response and attitude towards antipsychotic treatment. Considering that subjects treated with clozapine were treatment resistant patients, equal DAI score might indicate a more favorable subjective experience of clozapine. Further prospective studies on subjective response to various atypical agents are required to obtain valuable insight into how best to use these drugs from the patient's perspective.

Attitude towards antipsychotics among out-patients with schizophrenia in Nigeria

OBJECTIVE

The study aim to assess the attitude of patients with schizophrenia attending out-patient clinics in Nigeria towards antipsychotic medication and examine the factors associated with such attitude.

METHOD

Out-patients with schizophrenia (n = 312) completed the 10-item Drug Attitude Inventory. They were also evaluated for sociodemographic details, illness-related and drug-related variables.

RESULTS

Overall, the patients had a good attitude towards antipsychotic medication. The factors significantly associated with poor attitude towards medication include presence of symptoms, presence of side-effects like dyskinesia and sedation, lack of insight into the illness, and being employed.

CONCLUSION

Special attention should be paid to patients with these factors while designing programmes to improve overall compliance in patients with schizophrenia.

Methodological aspects in the assessment of treatment effects in observational health outcomes studies

Prospective observational studies, which provide information on the effectiveness of interventions in natural settings, may complement results from randomised clinical trials in the evaluation of health technologies. However, observational studies are subject to a number of potential methodological weaknesses, mainly selection and observer bias. This paper reviews and applies various methods to control for selection bias in the estimation of treatment effects and proposes novel ways to assess the presence of observer bias. We also address the issues of estimation and inference in a multilevel setting. We describe and compare the use of regression methods, propensity score matching, fixed-effects models incorporating investigator characteristics, and a multilevel, hierarchical model using Bayesian estimation techniques in the control of selection bias. We also propose to assess the existence of observer bias in observational studies by comparing patient- and investigator-reported outcomes. To illustrate these methods, we have used data from the SOHO (Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcomes) study, a large, prospective, observational study of health outcomes associated with the treatment of schizophrenia. The methods used to adjust for differences between treatment groups that could cause selection bias yielded comparable results, reinforcing the validity of the findings. Also, the assessment of observer bias did not show that it existed in the SOHO study. Observational studies, when properly conducted and when using adequate statistical methods, can provide valid information on the evaluation of health technologies.