Implants versus short-span fixed bridges: survival, complications, patients' benefits. A systematic review on economic aspects

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on different complex macro designs in commercially available implants: An in-vitro study

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effects of different commercially available complex implant macro designs on stress distributions using Finite element analysis. The experiment is done under varying simulated bone conditions to provide reference for clinical application.

Materials and methods

The study employed the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) method to compare four commercially available complex implant macro designs on a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) model of a maxillary bone segment. The three-dimensional geometrical model of the implants was reconstructed from computed tomography (CT)-slices in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format and contact condition between the implant and the bone was considered as 'Bonded', implying perfect osseointegration. All materials used in the models were assumed to be isotropic, homogeneous, and linearly elastic. The Finite element simulations employed load of 400 N under both axial and non-axial conditions Stresses were analysed under different bone conditions.

Results

Average values of von Mises stresses were used for comparing stress levels between implant designs. There was a definite increase in the equivalent stress values from higher density(D1)to lower density (D4) bone conditions for all implants. The percentage of increase ranged from 23.63 to 49.39 on axial loading and 20.39 to 57.19 when subjected to non-axial loading. The equivalent stress values resulted from non-axial loading were 1.78-2.94 times higher than that of axial loading for all implants under all bone densities. Among the complex designs Equinox Myriad Plus implant exhibited the least stress under axial loading (12.749-19.046 MPa) and (37.462-49.217 MPa) for non-axial loading. The stress on the crestal module was higher (1.49-2.99 times) than the overall stress on the implant regardless of the loading direction or bone conditions.

Conclusions

Data from the present study shows Equinox Myriad Plus implant generating the least equivalent stress and this can be taken as indicator in the biomechanical performance of the design.

How Can Imbalance in Oral Microbiota and Immune Response Lead to Dental Implant Problems?

Dental implantology is one of the most dynamically developing fields of dentistry, which, despite developing clinical knowledge and new technologies, is still associated with many complications that may lead to the loss of the implant or the development of the disease, including peri-implantitis. One of the reasons for this condition may be the fact that dental implants cannot yield a proper osseointegration process due to the development of oral microbiota dysbiosis and the accompanying inflammation caused by immunological imbalance. This study aims to present current knowledge as to the impact of oral microflora dysbiosis and deregulation of the immune system on the course of failures observed in dental implantology. Evidence points to a strong correlation between these biological disturbances and implant complications, often stemming from improper osseointegration, pathogenic biofilms on implants, as well as an exacerbated inflammatory response. Technological enhancements in implant design may mitigate pathogen colonization and inflammation, underscoring implant success rates.

Risk Factors Associated with Failure and Technical Complications of Implant-Supported Single Crowns: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: Implant-supported single crowns have become a routine approach for the replacement of missing single teeth, being considered as one of the most common ways of rehabilitation when adjacent teeth are healthy. The present retrospective study aimed to investigate the risk factors possibly associated with failure and technical complications of implant-supported single crowns and their supporting implants. Materials and Methods: Patients treated at one faculty (2009-2019) were considered for inclusion. Complications investigated included ceramic fracture/chipping, crown loss of retention/mobility, crown failure/fracture, loosening/loss/fracture of prosthetic screw, and implant failure/fracture. Any condition/situation that led to the removal/replacement of crowns (implant failure not included) was considered prosthesis failure. Univariate/multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate the associations between clinical covariates and failure. Results: 278 patients (358 crowns) were included. Mean ± SD follow-up was 56.5 ± 29.7 months. Seven implants (after a mean of 76.5 ± 43.7 months) and twenty crowns (21.3 ± 23.5 months) failed. The cumulative survival rate (CSR) for crowns was 93.5% after 5, remaining at 92.2% between 6 and 11 years. The most common reasons for crown failure were porcelain large fracture (n = 6), crown repeatedly loose (n = 6), and porcelain chipping (n = 5). Men and probable bruxism were identified in the Cox regression model as being associated with crown failure. The most common observed technical complications were mobility of the crown and chipping of the ceramic material, with the latter being observed even in crowns manufactured of monolithic zirconia. Cases with at least one technical complication (not considering loss of screw hole sealing) were more common among probable bruxers than in non-bruxers (p = 0.002). Cases of ceramic chipping were more common among bruxers than in non-bruxers (p = 0.014, log-rank test). Conclusions: Probable bruxism and patient's sex (men) were factors associated with a higher risk of failure of implant-supported single crowns.

Papilla dimension and soft tissue level after early vs. delayed placement of single-tooth implants: 10-year results from a randomized controlled clinical trial

AIM

To present the10-year esthetic outcome data for single-tooth implants placed early or delayed after tooth extraction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-four patients randomly allocated to two equal size groups were treated with a single-tooth implant approximately 10 days (Ea; N = 22), or 3 months (De; N = 22) after tooth extraction. Healing abutments were mounted after 3 months of submerged healing, and metal-ceramic crowns cemented after one additional month. Presence of buccal bone defects was registered at the second-stage surgery. Patients attended control visits 1 week and 1-1.5 years after mounting of the crown and 5 and 10 years after implant placement. Marginal bone level at the implant and the adjacent teeth as well as the distance between the implant and the teeth were measured in standardized periapical radiographs. The papilla dimension and clinical crown height (CCH) were assessed on clinical photographs by an experienced prosthodontist.

RESULTS

Two Ea and one De implants failed to osseointegrate. Twenty-eight patients (13 Ea and 15 De) who attended all four control visits were included in the data analysis. Complete papilla fill interproximally was achieved in one-third of the cases and an appropriate clinical crown height in <60% after 10 years. Although not statistically significant, early-placed implants tended to be superior to delayed-placed implants regarding soft tissue appearance just after crown delivery and after 10 years. An improvement in papilla dimensions was seen during the follow-up period for both groups while the CCH was unchanged. The implant region (anterior vs. posterior) did not significantly influence the papilla or CCH scores while younger patients (<50 years of age) received significantly better papilla scores than older patients (≥ 50 years). An apically located bone level at the tooth neighboring the implant influenced negatively the papilla dimension. In contrast, the presence of a bone defect buccally to the implant at second-stage surgery did not have a negative impact on the CCH 10 years after implant placement.

CONCLUSION

Early placement of single-tooth implants after tooth extraction performed equally to delayed placement in regard to the esthetic outcome of the soft tissues after 10 years in function.

A clinical and radiographic case series of implants placed with the simplified minimally invasive antral membrane elevation technique in the posterior maxilla

The aim of the present case series was to evaluate a simplified minimally invasive transalveolar sinus elevation technique utilizing calcium phosphosilicate (CPS) putty for hydraulic sinus membrane elevation. The simplified minimally invasive antral membrane elevation technique is based on the application of hydraulic pressure via a viscous bone graft that acts as an incompressible fluid. In this retrospective study, 21 patients (mean age: 48.5 ± 12 years) consecutively treated with the simplified minimally invasive transalveolar sinus elevation technique were evaluated. 28 tapered implants were placed in posterior maxillary sites with less than 6 mm of residual bone height as determined radiographically on cone beam volumetric tomographs. No sinus membrane perforations were noted and none of the patients complained of symptoms of sinusitis post-operatively (0%). The mean gain in bone height post-operatively was 10.31 ± 2.46 mm (p < 0.001). All implants successfully integrated (100% success rate) and were loaded with cement-retained prostheses. The proposed technique is a simple, efficacious, minimally invasive approach for sinus elevation that can be recommended for sites with at least 3 mm of residual height.

Treatment planning the endodontic-implant interface

One of the most challenging treatment planning decisions in restorative dentistry is the retention of a root filled tooth or its extraction and replacement with an implant. Making an informed judgement relies upon not only clinical experience and expertise but also interpretation of the published clinical evidence. In the last few years, more robust data and closer scrutiny of the evidence has helped to understand the advantages and disadvantages of each of these treatment modalities. The purpose of this paper is to provide a narrative review of some of the factors that may influence treatment planning for root canal treated teeth and indications for whether these teeth would be better replaced by an implant. From the evidence presented it is clear that both treatments have a place in contemporary restorative dental treatment and that survival for both root filled teeth and implants are similar. Unsurprisingly, both these treatment choices require high standards of clinical expertise and careful planning to ensure the best outcome.