Low tolerance and high toxicity of thalidomide as maintenance therapy after double autologous stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma patients

Immunomodulatory drugs and the risk of serious infection in multiple myeloma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies

The effect of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) on serious infection remains uncertain. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the possible impact of IMiDs on serious infection in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies from databases that addressed the effect of IMiDs on serious infection in patients with MM. We pooled data from RCTs and observational studies separately and used the GRADE approach to rate the quality of evidence. Rates in patients with individual IMiDs at different treatment status ranged from 7.00 to 23.00%. The use of thalidomide- or lenalidomide-based regimen induction therapy for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)-ineligible patients suggests increase in serious infection (RR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.31-1.93, p < 0.01). Compared to conventional therapy, IMiDs' induction in ASCT-eligible patients significantly decreases the risk of serious infection (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.94, p < 0.01). Lenalidomide-based therapy was associated with a significant increase in risk of serious infection in patients treated compared with conventional therapy (RR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.57-3.83, p < 0.01). The current evidence suggests that patients with MM treated with IMiDs are at a high risk of serious infection.

Thalidomide for managing cancer cachexia

BACKGROUND

Cancer cachexia is a multidimensional syndrome characterised by wasting, loss of weight, loss of appetite, metabolic alterations, fatigue and reduced performance status. A significant number of patients with advanced cancer develop cachexia before death. There is no identified optimum treatment for cancer cachexia. While the exact mechanism of the action of thalidomide is unclear, it is known to have immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties, which are thought to help reduce the weight loss associated with cachexia. Preliminary studies of thalidomide have demonstrated encouraging results.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of thalidomide, and (2) identify and assess adverse effects from thalidomide for cancer cachexia.

SEARCH METHODS

Electronic searches were undertaken in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL (from inception to April 2011). Reference lists from reviewed articles, trial registers, relevant conference documents and thalidomide manufacturers identified additional literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

This review included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. Participants were adults diagnosed with advanced or incurable cancer and weight loss or a clinical diagnosis of cachexia who were administered thalidomide.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All titles and abstracts retrieved by electronic searching were downloaded to a reference management database. Duplicates were removed and the remaining citations were read by two review authors and checked for eligibility. Studies that were deemed ineligible for inclusion had clear reasons for exclusion documented. Data were extracted independently by two review authors for all eligible studies. While a meta-analysis was planned for this review, this was not possible due to the small number of studies included and high heterogeneity among them. Thus a narrative synthesis of the findings is presented.

MAIN RESULTS

The literature search revealed a dearth of large, well conducted trials in this area. This has hindered the review authors' ability to make an informed decision about thalidomide for the management of cancer cachexia. At present, there is insufficient evidence to refute or support the use of thalidomide for the management of cachexia in advanced cancer patients.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The review authors cannot confirm or refute previous literature on the use of thalidomide for patients with advanced cancer who have cachexia and there is inadequate evidence to recommend it for clinical practice. Additional, well conducted, large RCTs are needed to test thalidomide both singularly and in combination with other treatment modalities to ascertain its true benefit, if any, for this population. Furthermore, one study (out of the three reviewed) highlighted that thalidomide was poorly tolerated and its use needs to be explored further in light of the frailty of this population.

Rates of venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma patients undergoing immunomodulatory therapy with thalidomide or lenalidomide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with thalidomide- and lenalidomide-based regimens is high. Recent observational studies have suggested that thromboprophylaxis might be efficacious in decreasing the risk of VTE in this population.

PURPOSE

To determine the absolute rates of VTE with and without different thromboprophylactic agents in patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated MM receiving thalidomide- or lenalidomide-based regimens.

RESULTS

Patients with newly diagnosed MM treated with thalidomide in combination with dexamethasone have a VTE risk of 4.1 (95% CI, 2.8-5.9) per 100 patient-cycles. Therapeutic doses of anticoagulants seem to provide the largest absolute risk reduction of VTE. The rate of VTE in patients with previously treated MM receiving thalidomide in combination with dexamethasone is 0.8 (95% CI, 0.1-2.1) per 100 patient-months. A combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone is associated with of risk of VTE of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.07-2.0) per 100 patient-cycles and 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4-0.9) per 100 patient-cycles in patients with newly diagnosed and previously treated MM, respectively. Similarly, the rates of VTE in patients also receiving thromboprophylaxis with aspirin were 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.5) and 0.6 (95% CI, 0.01-2.1), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated MM receiving thalidomide- or lenalidomide-based regimens in combination with dexamethasone are at high risk of VTE. The benefit of various types of thromboprophylaxis is difficult to quantify in patients with MM receiving immunomodulatory therapy, especially in those receiving lenalidomide-based therapy or who have previously treated MM. Randomized controlled trials are needed to address this important clinical need.

Combination of IFN-α/Gm-CSF as a Maintenance Therapy for Multiple Myeloma Patients After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT): A Prospective Phase II Study

Interferon alpha (IFN-α) has been used as a maintenance therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients. In this study, we combined GM-CSF with IFN-α in order to improve IFN tolerance in post-ASCT myeloma patients. Primary aims were to evaluate myelotoxicity and effectiveness of this maintenance therapy. The treatment included 4 × 10⁶ units of IFN-α and 125 μg/m² of GM-CSF given three times a week for twelve months. Twenty seven patients were enrolled within 120 days after ASCT. One patient discontinued treatment due to thrombocytopenia and seven others were taken off study due to flu-like symptoms and/or increase in liver enzymes. With a median follow-up of 45.5 months, the median overall survival was not reached while the median progression-free survival was 28 months. Eleven patients (42%) have remained in very good partial remission or complete remission since ASCT. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that maintenance with GM-CSF and IFN-α is safe and effective.

Ischemic heart disease associated with bortezomib treatment combined with dexamethasone in a patient with multiple myeloma

A 79-year-old female patient with multiple myeloma who had no prior cardiac disease history developed an acute myocardial infarction on day 5 after receiving bortezomib and dexamethasone (BD). After treatment of coronary stenoses by stents, she received another course of BD therapy and developed angina pectoris on day 5 after the therapy. Bortezomib's antitumor effect is due to the inhibition of proteasome activity. This inhibition may increase endothelial progenitor cell apoptosis and decrease endothelial nitric oxide synthase/nitric oxide (eNOS/NO), thus leading to coronary spasm. It is, therefore, important to carefully monitor patients being treated with bortezomib for the potential occurrence of ischemic heart disease.

New drugs in multiple myeloma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advances in the understanding of multiple myeloma pathogenesis have led to the development of innovative targeted therapies and improved management of this aggressive hematological neoplasia. This review will focus on the clinical trials that have reinforced the use of these new agents. Also, we will briefly take a look at the newer drugs making their way out of the laboratory and into early phase studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the past decade new multiple myeloma therapies featuring bortezomib and lenalidomide have come to light, whereas known agents such as thalidomide and arsenic trioxide have been reintroduced as key factors in multiple myeloma management. These new agents and their combinations have shown increased response rates and have added more options for patients with multiple myeloma whose disease has become resistant to conventional therapy. With these drug therapies has come a more targeted approach to treatment enabling not only improved antimyeloma efficacy but also the use of decreased dosing enhancing the safety and tolerability of these regimens. Newer agents including the histone deacetylase, hsp90, mammalian target of rapamycin and Akt inhibitors are showing promise preclinically and are now being assessed in phase I/II trials.

SUMMARY

This new antimultiple myeloma arsenal has shown its worth in both the relapsed/refractory and frontline setting and provides valuable options for patients with this debilitating disease.

Novel therapies in myeloma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Several novel therapies have been licensed for the treatment of myeloma in recent years. We summarize some of the trials leading to their approval and the current evidence for their clinical use. A number of promising agents undergoing phase I/II trial evaluation are also discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The immunomodulatory drugs, thalidomide and lenalidomide, and the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, have been shown to be effective agents, both alone and as part of combination regimens, for the treatment of myeloma. Studies are now focusing on the optimal sequencing of these drugs throughout the disease course, with a view to maximizing antitumor efficacy and minimizing overlapping toxicities. New protocols are increasingly based on preclinical evidence of synergy. The incorporation of these agents into transplant-based treatment protocols has improved outcomes. Other examples of novel agents undergoing assessment at present include arsenic trioxide, hsp90 inhibitors and histone deacetylase inhibitors. Future developments are likely to include individualized treatment plans based on patient-specific parameters including cytogenetic analysis and gene expression profiling.

SUMMARY

Thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib can now be considered as standard options both as first-line agents and beyond for the treatment of myeloma, with respective combinations also emerging as valid choices for all stages of the disease.