Safety and efficacy of bortezomib-based regimens for multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment: a retrospective study of Italian Myeloma Network GIMEMA

Risk nomogram for assessing renal recovery in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma-related renal impairment

To determine risk factors affecting renal recovery in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients with renal impairment (RI) and establish a risk nomogram. This multi-center, retrospective cohort study included 187 NDMM patients with RI, 127 of whom were admitted to Huashan Hospital and assigned to the training cohort and 60 were admitted to Changzheng Hospital and assigned to the external validation cohort. The baseline data of the 2 cohorts were compared, and survival and renal recovery rates were analyzed. Independent risk factors affecting renal recovery were determined by binary logistic regression analysis, and a risk nomogram was established and subsequently tested in the external validation cohort. Results: The median overall survival (OS) improved in patients who achieved renal recovery etc within 6 courses of MM directed treatment compared with patients without renal recovery. Median time to renal recovery was 2.65 courses, and the cumulative renal recovery rate during the first 3 courses was 75.05%. Involved serum free light chain (sFLC) ratio of >120 at diagnosis, time from renal impairment to treatment > 60 days, and a hematologic response without a very good partial remission (VGPR) or better resulted as independent risk factors for renal recovery during the first 3 courses. The established risk nomogram had good discriminative ability and accuracy. Involved sFLC was a key factor affecting renal recovery. Starting treatment as soon as possible after detecting RI and achieving deep hematologic remission during the first 3 courses of treatment helped achieve renal recovery and improve prognosis.

Acute myeloma kidney and SARS-COV2 infection with dialysis need: never say never - a case report

BACKGROUND

Older individuals with multiple comorbidities and especially patients with multiple myeloma are at higher risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2. When patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are also affected by SARS-CoV-2 the time to start immunosuppressants is still a clinical dilemma especially when urgent hemodialysis is required for acute kidney injury (AKI).

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of an 80-year-old woman who was diagnosed with AKI in MM. The patient began hemodiafiltration (HDF) with free light chain removal combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone. The reduction of free light chains concurrently was obtained by means of HDF using poly ester polymer alloy (PEPA) high-flux filter: 2 PEPA filters were used in series during each 4-h length HDF session. A total of 11 sessions was carried out. The hospitalization was complicated with acute respiratory failure caused by SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia successfully treated with both pharmacotherapy and respiratory support. Once the respiratory status stabilized MM treatment was resumed. The patient was discharged in stable condition after 3 months of hospitalization. The follow up showed significant improvement of the residual renal function which allowed interruption of hemodialysis (HD).

CONCLUSIONS

The complexity of patients affected by MM, AKI, and SARS-CoV-2 should not discourage the attending physicians to offer the adequate treatment. The cooperation of different specialists can lead to a positive outcome in those complicated cases.

High-cutoff hemodialysis in multiple myeloma patients with acute kidney injury

Multiple myeloma (MM), an incurable hematological malignancy with clonal proliferation of plasma cells, is mainly characterized by excessive production of monoclonal immunoglobulins and free light chains (FLCs). Kidney injury is one of the main clinical manifestations and is also a significant predictor of the prognosis of symptomatic MM patients, especially those who require dialysis-supported treatment. Overproduction of FLCs is the trigger for kidney injury, as they can induce the transcription of inflammatory and profibrotic cytokines in the proximal tubule and bind to Tamm-Horsfall protein in the distal tubules to form casts that obstruct the tubules, leading to kidney injury and even renal fibrosis. In addition to traditional antimyeloma treatment, high-cutoff hemodialysis (HCO-HD), which can effectively remove FLCs in vitro, has attracted much attention in recent years. Due to its greater membrane pore size, it has significant advantages in removing larger molecules and can be applied in rhabdomyolysis, sepsis, and even myeloma cast nephropathy. However, mounting questions have recently been raised regarding whether HCO-HD can truly provide clinical benefits in MM patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Therefore, in this study, we discussed the pathological causes of AKI secondary to MM and summarized the current situation of HCO-HD in MM patients compared with other available extracorporeal techniques. In addition, pivotal clinical trials that reflect the ability of the clearance of FLCs and the side effects of HCO-HD are highlighted, and the relevant protocol of HCO-HD is also provided to assist clinicians in decision-making.

Management of acute kidney injury in frail patients with biopsy-proven cast nephropathy: a combined approach with chemotherapy plus Supra-hemodiafiltration with post-adsorption endogenous reinfusion

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple myeloma often have kidney involvement with acute kidney injury which is frequently due to cast nephropathy. Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) allows removal from the circulation of significant amounts of free light chains (FLCs) responsible for tubular damage.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2018, 13 patients affected by multiple myeloma (64% λ chain and 36% k), including 10 cases with biopsy-proven cast nephropathy, were treated with this technique. Each patient had high free light chains levels at diagnosis: median 8586 mg/l for λ and 4200 mg/l for k, and stage III acute kidney injury (median serum creatinine 7.5 mg/dl). We initially performed daily HFR-Supra sessions and then modulated them based on renal response (mean 10 sessions/patient). At the same time, the patients also received various chemotherapy regimens, depending on their hematological criteria.

RESULTS

Forty-six percent of patients showed at least partial renal function recovery within the third month, thus allowing dialysis discontinuation; 38% remained on dialysis. Two patients died. The mean reduction rate of free light chains at the end of the HFR-Supra cycle was 85% (k) and 40% (λ), respectively. Serum albumin remained stable during the whole treatment.

DISCUSSION

In our experience, the synergistic effect of chemotherapy and HFR-Supra led to a recovery of renal function in 6 out of 13 patients presenting with severe dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury. HFR-Supra allowed stable albumin levels, with high free light chains removal rate, at a relatively low costs.

Management of acute kidney injury in symptomatic multiple myeloma

Symptomatic multiple myeloma is commonly complicated by acute kidney injury through various mechanisms. The most frequent is the precipitation of monoclonal free light chains with uromodulin in the distal tubules, defining light chain cast nephropathy. Early diagnosis and identification of the cause of acute kidney injury are required for optimizing management and avoiding chronic kidney injury that strongly affects quality of life and patient survival. In light chain cast nephropathy, often manifesting with severe acute kidney injury, renal recovery requires urgent intervention based on vigorous rehydration, correction of precipitating factors, and efficient anti-plasma cell chemotherapy to rapidly reduce the secretion of nephrotoxic free light chains. Currently, the association of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib with high-dose dexamethasone is the standard regimen in newly diagnosed patients. The addition of another drug such as cyclophosphamide or an immunodulatory agent may improve free light chain response but raises tolerance concerns in frail patients. Further studies are warranted to confirm the role of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, whose efficacy and tolerance have been documented in patients without renal impairment. Despite controversial results from randomized studies, recent data suggest that in patients with light chain cast nephropathy and acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, the combination of chemotherapy with free light chain removal through high-cutoff hemodialysis may increase renal response recovery rates. Kidney biopsy may be helpful in guiding management and assessing renal prognosis that appears to depend on the extent of cast formation and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy. Because of continuous improvement in life expectancy of patients with multiple myeloma, renal transplantation is likely to be increasingly considered in selected candidates.

Expert Panel Consensus Statement for Proper Evaluation of First Relapse in Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A working group of six expert physicians convened to assess the spectrum of multiple myeloma relapse presentations, discussed the features that can define the disease as aggressive and not aggressive, and established whether this information could help in selecting treatment together with the characteristics of disease and of patients and type of prior therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

The working group agreed that relapse should be distinguished between biochemical and clinical according to IMWG. Moreover, the expert panel defined "aggressive disease" as a clinical condition that requires therapy able to induce a rapid and as deep as possible response to release symptoms and to avoid impending danger of new events. According to this definition, relapse was considered aggressive if it presents with at least one of the following features: doubling of M protein rate over 2 months, renal insufficiency, hypercalcemia, extramedullary disease, elevated LDH, high plasma cell proliferative index, presence of plasma cells in peripheral blood, or skeletal-related complications. Moreover, the panel agreed that this classification can be useful to choose therapy in first relapse together with other patient, disease, and prior therapy characteristics. So, this item was included in a new therapeutic algorithm. The treatment choice in MM at relapse is wider than in the past with the availability of many new therapeutic regimens leading to increased diversity of approaches and relevant risk of inappropriate treatment decisions. A practical classification of relapses into aggressive or non-aggressive, included in a decisional algorithm on MM management at first relapse, could help to make the appropriate treatment decisions.

Randomized Trial Comparing Double Versus Triple Bortezomib-Based Regimen in Patients With Multiple Myeloma and Acute Kidney Injury Due to Cast Nephropathy

PURPOSE

We report a multicenter controlled trial comparing renal recovery and tolerance profile of doublet versus triplet bortezomib-based regimens in patients with initial myeloma cast nephropathy (CN) and acute kidney injury (AKI) without need for dialysis.

METHODS

After symptomatic measures and high-dose dexamethasone, patients were randomly assigned to receive bortezomib plus dexamethasone (BD), or BD plus cyclophosphamide (C-BD). In patients with < 50% reduction of serum free light chains (sFLCs) after 3 cycles, chemotherapy was reinforced with either cyclophosphamide (BD group) or thalidomide (C-BD group).

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were enrolled in each group. At random assignment, characteristics of the 2 groups were similar, including median age (68 years) and serum creatinine level (305.5 and 273.5 µmol/L in BD and C-BD group, respectively). At 3 months, renal response rate (primary end point) was not different (41 v 47 responders in the BD and C-BD groups, respectively; relative risk [RR], 0.87; P = .46). Very good partial response (free light chain reduction ≥ 90%) or more was achieved in 36 and 47 patients, respectively (RR, 0.76; P = .10). After 1 cycle of chemotherapy, 69 in the BD group and 67 patients in the C-BD group had achieved sFLC level ≤ 500 mg/L. Serious adverse events were recorded in 30 and 40 patients, respectively. At 12 months, 19 patients had died (9 in the BD group v 10 in the C-BD group), including 10 (6 in the BD group and 4 in the C-BD group) from myeloma progression and 3 (0 in the BD group and 3 in the C-BD group) from infection. Within median follow-up of 27 months, 43 and 42 patients switched to new therapy, respectively. Overall, 50 patients (24 in the BD group and 26 in the C-BD group) had died.

CONCLUSION

This randomized study did not show any benefit of C-BD compared with BD on renal recovery of patients with initial CN not requiring dialysis. Adding cyclophosphamide did not sufficiently improve the efficacy-toxicity balance. Patients with myeloma with AKI are fragile, and indication for doublet or triplet regimen should be adapted to frailty.

Special considerations for the treatment of multiple myeloma according to advanced age, comorbidities, frailty and organ dysfunction

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is primarily a disease of old age with a median age of sixty-nine years at diagnosis. The development of novel therapies for induction and use of autologous stem cell transplantation has resulted in improved clinical outcomes and better quality of life for MM patients. Elderly patients, comprising the majority of MM population, have a higher incidence of age-related comorbidities, frailty and organ dysfunction which complicates the coordination of treatment and limits the selection of therapies. Even in the era of multiple chemotherapeutic options, the clinical heterogeneity of the myeloma patients' demands personalized treatments which often require dose-adjustments or dose delays. The use of reduced-dose regimens and various comorbidity indices has improved clinical outcome and regimen tolerability in MM patients with renal, neurological and bone abnormalities. We focus on advancements in the treatment of multiple myeloma with the goal to guide clinicians towards patient-specific management.

Treatment of multiple myeloma with renal involvement: the nephrologist's view

Renal injury is a common complication in multiple myeloma (MM). In fact, as many as 10% of patients with MM develop dialysis-dependent acute kidney injury related to increased free light chain (FLC) production by a plasma cell clone. Myeloma cast nephropathy (MCN) is the most prevalent pathologic diagnosis associated with renal injury, followed by light chain deposition disease and light chain amyloidosis. Several FLC removal techniques have been explored to improve kidney disease in MM but their impact on renal clinical outcomes remains unclear. According to the evidence, high cut-off haemodialysis should be restricted to MM patients on chemotherapy with histological diagnosis of MCN and haemodialysis requirements. From our perspective, more efforts are needed to improve kidney outcomes in patients with MM and renal failure.

Myeloma light chain cast nephropathy, a review

Multiple Myeloma is a plasma cell proliferative disorder that commonly involves the kidney. Renal impairment is a serious complication during the course of the disease that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Light chain cast nephropathy is the predominant pattern of renal injury in Multiple Myeloma. This review article focuses on the pathophysiology and diagnostic approach of myeloma cast nephropathy. The management of precipitating factors as well as anti-plasma cell treatment modalities in the context of renal impairment are also discussed.

Effect of High-Cutoff Hemodialysis vs Conventional Hemodialysis on Hemodialysis Independence Among Patients With Myeloma Cast Nephropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Cast nephropathy is the main cause of acute kidney injury in multiple myeloma and persistent reduction in kidney function strongly affects prognosis. Strategies to rapidly remove nephrotoxic serum-free light chains combined with novel antimyeloma agents have not been evaluated prospectively.

Objective

To compare the hemodialysis independence rate among patients newly diagnosed with myeloma cast nephropathy treated with hemodialysis using a high-cutoff dialyzer (with very large membrane pores and high permeability to immunoglobulin light chains) or a conventional high-flux dialyzer (with small pores and lower permeability).

Design, Setting, and Participants

Randomized clinical trial involving 98 patients with biopsy-proven myeloma cast nephropathy requiring hemodialysis treated at 48 French centers between July 2011 and June 2016; the final date of follow-up was June 29, 2016.

Interventions

Intensive hemodialysis (eight 5-hour sessions over 10 days) with either a high-cutoff dialyzer (46 patients) or a conventional high-flux dialyzer (48 patients). All patients received the same chemotherapy regimen of bortezomib and dexamethasone.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end point was hemodialysis independence at 3 months; secondary end points: hemodialysis independence rates at 6 and 12 months, hemodialysis- and chemotherapy-related adverse events, and death.

Results

Among 98 randomized patients, 94 (96%) (median age, 68.8 years [interquartile range, 61.2-75.3 years]; 45% women) were included in the modified intent-to-treat analysis. The hemodialysis independence rate at 3 months was 41.3% (n = 19) in the high-cutoff hemodialysis group vs 33.3% (n = 16) in the conventional hemodialysis group (between-group difference, 8.0% [95% CI, -12.0% to 27.9%], P = .42); at 6 months, the rate was 56.5% (n = 26) vs 35.4% (n = 17), respectively (between-group difference, 21.1% [95% CI, 0.9% to 41.3%], P = .04); and at 12 months, the rate was 60.9% (n = 28) vs 37.5% (n = 18) (between-group difference, 23.4% [95% CI, 3.2% to 43.5%], P = .02). The incidence of hemodialysis-related adverse events was 43% in the high-cutoff hemodialysis group vs 39% in the conventional hemodialysis group; chemotherapy-related serious adverse events, 39% vs 37%, respectively; and at 12 months, 9 patients vs 10 patients died.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients with myeloma cast nephropathy treated with a bortezomib-based chemotherapy regimen, the use of high-cutoff hemodialysis compared with conventional hemodialysis did not result in a statistically significant difference in hemodialysis independence at 3 months. However, the study may have been underpowered to identify an early clinically important difference.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01208818.

Effectiveness of IHD with Adsorptive PMMA Membrane in Myeloma Cast Nephropathy: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

In patients with cast nephropathy and acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring dialysis, the reduction of serum free light chains (FLC) using chemotherapy and intensive hemodialysis (IHD) with a high cut-off filter may improve renal and patient outcomes. We evaluated the effectiveness of a combination of chemotherapy and IHD with an adsorbent polymethylmethacrylate membrane (IHD-PMMA) on renal recovery and survival.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort-study was conducted. Between 2007 and 2014, patients with dialysis-dependent acute cast nephropathy treated with chemotherapy and IHD-PMMA were included. Patients had six 6-h hemodialysis sessions a week, until predialysis serum FLC fell below 200 mg/L, for a maximum of 3 weeks. Primary outcomes were renal recovery, defined as dialysis independence, and survival.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were included, all with stage 3 AKI. All received chemotherapy, mostly based on bortezomib and steroids (88%). Twelve patients (71%) achieved renal recovery, usually within 60 days (92%). At 3 months, the overall hematological response rate was 57%; hematological response was maintained for at least 2 years in 86% of responders. At 6, 12, and 24 months, 76, 75, and 62% of patients were alive, respectively. Higher reduction in involved FLC by day 12 (p = 0.022) and day 21 (p = 0.003) was associated with renal recovery. Patients with FLC reduction rate >50% by day 21 experienced a lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.63).

CONCLUSION

In patients with dialysis-dependent myeloma cast nephropathy, early FLC removal by IHD-PMMA combined with chemotherapy was associated with high rates of renal recovery and survival.

Multiple myeloma treatment at relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation: A practical analysis

Over the past decade, significant advances have been made in the field of multiple myeloma. Introduction of the so-called novel agents, proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), and improved supportive care have resulted in significantly better outcome. Standard first line treatment in fit patients include PI and IMiD based induction, high dose melphalan with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and consolidation/maintenance. However, despite these progresses MM remains incurable for the majority of patients and most patients will relapse. Next generation PI (carfilzomib, ixazomib) and IMiD (pomalidomide) and new therapeutic classes: monoclonal antibody (elotuzumab, daratumumab) and pan-deacetylase inhibitors (panobinostat) have been successfully evaluated in relapse multiple myeloma. Some of these new agents are now approved for multiple myeloma treatment at relapse. However choosing the most appropriate treatment at relapse may be difficult. This review sum up the most important studies and provide evidence to choose the most relevant therapeutic strategy for relapse after ASCT, based on disease, patient and previous treatment related parameters.

Current treatments for renal failure due to multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Renal impairment (RI) is one of the most common complication of multiple myeloma (MM). RI is present in almost 20% of MM patients at diagnosis and in 40%-50% of patients during the course of their disease. Areas covered: Biology along with tools for diagnosis and management of RI are reported in this paper. Papers published in PubMed and reported abstracts up to May 2016 were used. Expert opinion: Moderate and severe RI increases the risk of early death; thus rapid intervention and initiation of anti-myeloma treatment is essential and improves renal outcomes in RI patients. Bortezomib and dexamethasone triplet combinations are the current standard of therapy for MM patients with acute kidney injury due to cast nephropathy; they offer high rates of both anti-myeloma response and renal recovery. Thalidomide and lenalidomide may be used in bortezomib refractory patients. In the relapsed/refractory setting additional treatment options such as carfilzomib, pomalidomide and monoclonal antibodies are available; however, there is limited data for their effects on patients with RI. High dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation should be considered in otherwise eligible patients with RI. Finally, high cut-off hemodialysis membranes do not seem to offer significant additive effects on anti-myeloma therapies.

Follow-up of IgD-κ multiple myeloma by monitoring free light chains and total heavy chain IgD: A case report

Immunoglobulin (Ig)D-κ multiple myeloma (MM) is a rare neoplastic disease characterized by an aggressive and rapidly progressing course, which constitutes only a very small proportion of all MM cases. In the present report, the clinical case of a 51-year-old Caucasian woman diagnosed with IgD-κ MM is described. The patient underwent different chemotherapeutic treatments subsequently to a single autologous stem cell transplantation. Despite the inherent difficulty of monitoring IgD levels and performing serum immunofixation electrophoresis, the clinical outcome of the patient was almost uniquely monitored by measuring the levels of κ and λ free light chains (FLCs) and total heavy chain IgD. The data suggest the non-invasive potential and usefulness of FLCs evaluation for early detection of stringent complete remission, follow-up and early detection of disease relapse. In addition, this diagnostic procedure has successfully been employed for the therapeutic monitoring of the present patient, and may represent a very helpful, non-invasive tool for the follow-up of IgD myeloma patients without the requirement of serial bone marrow aspirate.

Managing renal complications in multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

About 20-40% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) will present with some degree of renal impairment (RI) and about 25% of patients will experience RI at later disease stages. Patients with MM and RI have poorer overall survival and are at higher risk of early death.

AREAS COVERED

The mechanisms of acute renal damage in MM are covered and the issues around diagnosis and renal evaluation response are discussed. The importance of optimal supportive care is stressed and the role and effectiveness of different anti-myeloma agents covered including the role of high cut-off hemodialysis, autologous stem cell transplantation and kidney transplant. Expert commentary: Outcomes of patients with RI and rates of renal recovery have improved with the use of novel anti-myeloma agents. Bortezomib-dexamethasone backbone regimes (±third agent) are the current first choice in newly diagnosed patients. In relapsed/refractory disease additional treatment options include newer novel agents.

[The roles of serum free light chain ratio in the diagnosis and prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma]

目的

分析血清游离轻链（sFLC）κ/λ比率（sFLCR）在初诊多发性骨髓瘤（MM）患者诊断和预后中的作用。

方法

回顾性分析2012年9月至2015年7月收治的82例初诊MM患者的临床资料，采用血清蛋白电泳（SPE）和免疫固定电泳（IFE）法检测血清单克隆蛋白（M蛋白）的表达，采用免疫比浊法检测sFLCκ、λ的表达水平，分析初诊时sFLCR在MM患者诊断和预后中的作用。

结果

初诊时82例患者中SPE法检测M蛋白阳性率为85.5%，IFE法检测M蛋白阳性率为93.9%，sFLC异常以及sFLCR异常者占96.3%。初诊时高比率组（sFLCR≥100或≤0.01，42例）与低比率组（0.01 <sFLCR<100，40例）患者40个月的总生存率分别为87％和61%，差异有统计学意义（P=0.034）。与低比率组患者比较，高比率组患者初诊时血肌酐值、浆细胞数、β₂微球蛋白增高，血红蛋白降低，肾功能不全及需要透析者、DS分期Ⅲ期B组者、ISS分期Ⅲ期者、FISH检查异常者、λ轻链异常者较多，κ轻链异常者较少（P值均<0.05）。两组患者经过3~4个疗程诱导治疗后，高比率组和低比率组患者的治疗有效率（非常好的部分缓解及其以上）差异有统计学意义（45.2％对72.5%，P=0.012）。初诊肾功能不全者（肌酐≥178 µmol/L, 14例）与肾功能正常者（68例）的2年总生存率差异无统计学意义（85.7％对91.2%，P=0.894）。

结论

初诊时sFLC的检测相对于SPE和IFE法检测M蛋白对诊断MM有更高的敏感性；初诊时sFLCR明显异常的患者可能具有更高的肿瘤负荷和更强的侵袭性，可提示患者预后不良；初诊时伴有肾功能不全的MM患者经积极治疗后可获得与肾功能正常患者同样的疗效。

International Myeloma Working Group Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Management of Myeloma-Related Renal Impairment

Purpose

The aim of the International Myeloma Working Group was to develop practical recommendations for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma–related renal impairment (RI).

Methods

Recommendations were based on published data through December 2015, and were developed using the system developed by the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group.

Recommendations

All patients with myeloma at diagnosis and at disease assessment should have serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and electrolytes measurements as well as free light chain, if available, and urine electrophoresis of a sample from a 24-hour urine collection (grade A). The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, preferably, or the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula should be used for the evaluation of estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with stabilized serum creatinine (grade A). International Myeloma Working Group criteria for renal reversibility should be used (grade B). For the management of RI in patients with multiple myeloma, high fluid intake is indicated along with antimyeloma therapy (grade B). The use of high-cutoff hemodialysis membranes in combination with antimyeloma therapy can be considered (grade B). Bortezomib-based regimens remain the cornerstone of the management of myeloma-related RI (grade A). High-dose dexamethasone should be administered at least for the first month of therapy (grade B). Thalidomide is effective in patients with myeloma with RI, and no dose modifications are needed (grade B). Lenalidomide is effective and safe, mainly in patients with mild to moderate RI (grade B); for patients with severe RI or on dialysis, lenalidomide should be given with close monitoring for hematologic toxicity (grade B) with dose reduction as needed. High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (with melphalan 100 mg/m2 to 140 mg/m2) is feasible in patients with RI (grade C). Carfilzomib can be safely administered to patients with creatinine clearance > 15 mL/min, whereas ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone can be safely administered to patients with creatinine clearance > 30 mL/min (grade A).

Lenalidomide is effective and safe for the treatment of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and very severe renal impairment

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and severe renal impairment (SRI) have shorter survival than MM patients without renal failure. Although lenalidomide is a highly active drug, this immunomodulatory agent is frequently neglected in this context due to its predominant renal clearance and, consequently, an increased risk of toxicity. This risk might be overcome with the proper lenalidomide dose adjustment to renal function. This study evaluates the outcomes of 23 relapsed MM patients with SRI (baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) <30 mL/min) treated with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (LenDex), including 56 % (13 patients) under hemodialysis. The median CrCl at start of LenDex was 19 mL/min; an overall response rate (partial response or better) of 56 % was obtained, with a median follow-up from start of LenDex of 52 months (8-79). The median time until maximal response was 4 months, and in 58 % (7/12), the response was longer than 2 years. Nine percent had renal improvement, but all the 13 patients on hemodialysis remained under treatment. LenDex was interrupted in three cases because of adverse events (infections and cutaneous events); 78 % of the patients were on thromboprophylaxis with aspirin. It is important to notice that, after initial dose adjustment of therapy, there should be a continuous process of dose adjustment, taking into account variations in renal function. Furthermore, lenalidomide dose adjustment should be made according to the individual tolerance, even with stable renal function. LenDex dose adjustment, according to these principles, does not negatively impact response and improves treatment tolerance. It has a clear potential to treat this group of patients and to induce long duration of responses [event-free survival (EFS) 20.5 m and overall survival (OS) 42.6 m].

Current Trends of Renal Impairment in Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Renal impairment (RI) is a common complication of multiple myeloma (MM). Around 50% of patients with MM have RI at presentation, and up to 5% require dialysis treatment. Severe acute kidney injury (AKI) as a cause of RI is a particular challenge as historically the survival of patients who sustain this complication and require dialysis is very poor. However, in this current period, survival is improving and the focus is on optimum use of novel chemotherapies and the evaluation of extra-corporeal therapies for removal of serum immunoglobulin light chains.

SUMMARY

RI in patients with MM is commonly associated with excess monoclonal free light chain (FLC) production; myeloma cast nephropathy is the predominant renal pathology in patients presenting with severe RI secondary to AKI. The majority of patients have mild to moderate RI and recover renal function. However, patients with more severe RI, in particular those with a requirement for dialysis, are less likely to recover renal function. Rapid diagnosis and prompt institution of anti-myeloma therapy is an important determinant of renal function recovery, through targeting early and sustained reduction of involved monoclonal FLC. Novel agents are associated with excellent disease response, and bortezomib is now widely used as a first-line agent in the management of MM in patients with severe RI. Extended haemodialysis using high cut-off dialysers is more effective for extracorporeal removal of FLC than plasma exchange, and clinical trials are in process. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation does have a role in patients with severe RI but requires careful patient selection.

KEY MESSAGES

RI is very common in patients with MM, and renal function recovery is associated with improved clinical outcomes. We summarise the epidemiology of MM in the UK, present the impact of RI and renal function recovery on patient outcome, and describe the current management of MM in western countries.

FACTS FROM EAST AND WEST

(1) A serum creatinine level >2 mg/dl has been reported in 16, 21, 24, and 33% of patients with MM in cohort studies from Japan, Europe, China, and Korea, respectively. A creatinine clearance rate <30 ml/min was observed in 30 and 15% of patients in Chinese and Western MM cohorts, respectively. The commonest cause of severe RI in patients with MM is myeloma cast nephropathy. (2) The efficacy of novel treatments (bortezomib, carfilzomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide) has predominantly been assessed in Western patients. Bortezomib and dexamethasone are the current standard of care for MM and severe RI in the West. Severe RI is not a contraindication to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Most of the data are from the West; there are case reports from China describing good outcomes with ASCT. The removal of FLC by high-cut-off hemodialysis is under evaluation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the West. Studies in this area are not yet conducted in China. In China, new treatments, such as bortezomib, are more widely used than before, and favorable results are being reported; however, RCT studies are still needed in this area to confirm the efficacy and safety of this and other novel treatments.

Trends in Survival and Renal Recovery in Patients with Multiple Myeloma or Light-Chain Amyloidosis on Chronic Dialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Monoclonal gammopathies (MGs) with renal involvement can lead to ESRD caused by myeloma cast nephropathy (MCN), immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (ALA), or light-chain deposition disease (LCDD). Few studies have focused on the prognosis of patients with MG on chronic dialysis. We evaluated the outcomes of patients with MG incident on chronic dialysis in France.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

All incident patients registered in the Renal Epidemiology and Information Network Registry between 2002 and 2011 with ESRD caused by ALA, LCDD, or MCN were included. Patient's survival, censored for renal transplantation, renal recovery, and loss to follow-up, as well as renal outcomes were analyzed and compared with a control group. Risk factors and causes of death were analyzed.

RESULTS

We included 1459 patients, comprising 265 (18%) patients with ALA, 334 (23%) patients with LCDD, and 861 (59%) patients with MCN. Median age was 72 years, and 56% were men. Median follow-up was 13.1 months. Renal recovery was observed in 9.1% of patients and more frequent after 2006. Kidney transplantation was rare in this population (2.3%). Among 1272 patients who remained on dialysis, 67% died. Median survival on dialysis was 18.3 months. Main causes of death were malignancies (34.4%), cardiovascular diseases (18%), infections (13.3%), and cachexia (5.2%). Independent risk factors of death were age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03 per year increase; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.02 to 1.03), frailty (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.36), congestive heart failure (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.93), and dialysis initiation on a central catheter (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.75). Factors associated with a lower risk of death were year of dialysis initiation (HR, 0.95 per year increase; 95% CI, 0.91 to 0.99) and high BP (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival of patients with ALA, LCDD, or MCN on chronic dialysis is poor but has improved over time. Progressive malignancy is the main cause of death in this population. Renal recovery has increased since 2006.

Limiting early mortality: Do's and don'ts in the management of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

In the era of novel biological agents, multiple myeloma (MM) is often approached as a chronic condition. While survival continues to improve, population-level data indicate that early mortality remains a substantial barrier to advances in MM outcomes. Here we provide "do's and don'ts" management recommendations that may minimize the risk of early mortality and ensure that patients have the opportunity to benefit from the long term impact of new effective MM agents. Such recommendations encompass the early introduction of novel agents even in the presence of comorbidities and advanced age and aggressive management of MM-related complications.

Bence-Jones Protein λ-type Multiple Myeloma Patient Withdrawn from Maintenance Hemodialysis after Long-term Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Therapy

The effectiveness of bortezomib treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) is well established. However, the protocol by which maintenance therapy using bortezomib should be continued for myeloma patients requiring regular hemodialysis remains to be established. We herein report a case of MM with severe renal insufficiency requiring hemodialysis for nearly 30 months which was finally withdrawn from renal replacement therapy during monthly maintenance treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone for two years. The details of this case are essential for establishing clinical guidelines for applying intermittent low-frequency bortezomib therapy in dialysis-dependent myeloma patients.

Bortezomib enhances expression of effector molecules in anti-tumor CD8+ T lymphocytes by promoting Notch-nuclear factor-κB crosstalk

The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment usurps host antitumor immunity by multiple mechanisms including interference with the Notch system, which is important for various metazoan cell fate decisions and hematopoietic cell differentiation and function. We observed that treatment with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in mice bearing various solid tumors resulted in an upregulated expression of various Notch signaling components in lymphoid tissues, thereby increasing CD8+T-lymphocyte IFNγ secretion and expression of effector molecules, perforin and granzyme B, as well as the T-box transcription factor eomesodermin. Bortezomib also neutralized TGFβ-mediated suppression of IFNγ and granzyme B expression in activated CD8+T-cells. Of note, bortezomib reversed tumor-induced downregulation of Notch receptors, Notch1 and Notch2, as well as increased the levels of cleaved Notch intracellular domain (NICD) and downstream targets Hes1 and Hey1 in tumor-draining CD8+T-cells. Moreover, bortezomib promoted CD8+T-cell nuclear factor-κB (NFκB) activity by increasing the total and phosphorylated levels of the IκB kinase and IκBα as well as the cytoplasmic and nuclear levels of phosphorylated p65. Even when we blocked NFκB activity by Bay-11-7082, or NICD cleavage by γ-secretase inhibitor, bortezomib significantly increased expression of Notch Hes1 and Hey1 genes as well as perforin, granzyme B and eomesodermin in activated CD8+T-cells. Data suggest that bortezomib can rescue tumor-induced dysfunction of CD8+T-cells by its intrinsic stimulatory effects promoting NICD-NFκB crosstalk. These findings provide novel insights on using bortezomib not only as an agent to sensitize tumors to cell death but also to provide lymphocyte-stimulatory effects, thereby overcoming immunosuppressive actions of tumor on anti-tumor T-cell functions.

Prognostic value of kidney biopsy in myeloma cast nephropathy: a retrospective study of 70 patients

BACKGROUND

Light chain myeloma cast nephropathy (MCN) is the major cause of renal failure in multiple myeloma and strongly impacts patient survival. The role of kidney biopsy in the management of MCN is unclear.

METHODS

Renal pathological findings were retrospectively studied in 70 patients with multiple myeloma and MCN. Patients were categorized according to the achievement or not of renal response, as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and/or dialysis independence at 3 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (46%) achieved a renal response. In the whole study population, the following parameters differed significantly between patients with and without renal response, respectively: baseline median eGFR (13.3 versus 9.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.017), Acute Kidney Injury Network Stage 3 (68.8 versus 92.1%, P = 0.019), haematological response rate (94 versus 34%, P < 0.0001), median percentage of free light chain (FLC) reduction at Day 21 (92 versus 24%, P = 0.006) and median number of casts/10 fields (14 versus 25, P = 0.005). The extent of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy was similar. In multivariate analysis, only FLC reduction at Day 21 was significantly associated with renal response. However, when considering only the subgroup of haematological responders, both median number of casts [odds ratio (OR) = 0.93, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.88-0.98, P = 0.01] and extent of tubular atrophy (OR = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00-0.52, P = 0.02) were independent predictors of renal response.

CONCLUSIONS

In MCN, the presence of numerous casts and diffuse tubular atrophy is associated with poor renal prognosis. These data suggest that additional strategies to reduce FLC burden should be considered in patients with extensive cast formation.

Bortezomib produces high hematological response rates with prolonged renal survival in monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease

Monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD) is a rare complication of plasma cell disorders, defined by linear Congo red-negative deposits of monoclonal light chain, heavy chain, or both along basement membranes. While renal involvement is prominent, treatment strategies, such as the impact of novel anti-myeloma agents, remain poorly defined. Here we retrospectively studied 49 patients with MIDD who received a median of 4.5 cycles of intravenous bortezomib plus dexamethasone. Of these, 25 received no additional treatment, 18 also received cyclophosphamide, while 6 also received thalidomide or lenalidomide. The hematological diagnoses identified 38 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance, 10 with symptomatic multiple myeloma, and 1 with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. The overall hematologic response rate, based on the difference between involved and uninvolved serum-free light chains (dFLCs), was 91%. After median follow-up of 54 months, 5 patients died and 10 had reached end-stage renal disease. Renal response was achieved in 26 patients, with a 35% increase in median eGFR and an 86% decrease in median 24-h proteinuria. Predictive factors were pre-treatment eGFR over 30 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) and post-treatment dFLC under 40 mg/l; the latter was the sole predictive factor of renal response by multivariable analysis. Thus, bortezomib-based therapy is a promising treatment strategy in MIDD, mainly when used early in the disease course. dFLC response is a favorable prognostic factor for renal survival.

Treatment options for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Over the last few decades, significant improvement in outcomes has been observed for myeloma patients, mainly as a result of the use of currently available approved antimyeloma agents, along with combining autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of myeloma. With more targeted agents in development, the treatment of a myeloma patient at relapse has become complicated and, as a consequence, results in vast heterogeneity in treatment patterns. Although a consensus on the timing of initiation of treatment, the choice of agents to be used, and the role of transplant is less clear, we describe an evidence-based approach and the factors to consider upon relapse. We describe additional newer agents and targets that are under development, with the goal of achievement of durable remissions for myeloma patients.

Shoulder pad sign and asymptomatic hypercalcemia in a patient with end-stage kidney disease

Interpreting an abnormal serum calcium level in subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires the simultaneous evaluation of various clinical and laboratory parameters. An excessive intake of calcium salts and vitamin D overdosing may be the most common etiologies of hypercalcemia in individuals with advanced CKD. Nevertheless, it should be noted that such patients are susceptible to all diseases that may cause hypercalcemia in subjects without renal disease. In this report, we describe the case of a male chronic hemodialysis patient who developed asymptomatic hypercalcemia associated with polyarticular swelling. On the basis of the findings of systemic workup, he was finally diagnosed as having multiple myeloma. The so-called shoulder pad sign, which is pathognomonic for light chain amyloidosis, although its detection remains a challenge for physicians, was a clue leading to the prompt diagnosis of the disease in the current case. The impact of articular manifestations on the diagnostic strategy for assessing multiple myeloma is also discussed.

Clinical characteristics of a group of patients with multiple myeloma who had two different λ light chains by immunofixation electrophoresis: A retrospective study from a single center

The objective of the present study was to conduct a retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics of a group of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who had two different immunoglobulin λ light chains as determined by immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE). A total of 26 patients with MM had two different λ light chains by IFE at diagnosis in hospital from January 2006 to June 2012. Data were collected from the medical records of these patients. The clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, responses, risk factors and outcomes of this special group of patients were retrospectively analyzed. The patients with MM and two different λ light chains by IFE accounted for 5.4% (26/483) of all the patients with MM during the same period. There were 17 patients (65.4%) with renal dysfunction and 10 patients (38.5%) with extramedullary plasmacytoma (EMP) at diagnosis. Ten patients (38.5%) had abnormalities by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) including t(4;14), t(14;16) and/or del17p. Of these patients, three (11.5%) achieved complete remission (CR), six (23.1%) very good partial remission (VGPR), six (23.1%) partial remission (PR) and the overall remission (OR) rate was 57.7% (15/26). The OR rate of the patients who received chemotherapy with bortezomib was superior to that of the patients who received chemotherapy without bortezomib (78.6% vs. 33.3%; P<0.05). The OR rate of the patients who received autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) was superior to that of the patients who did not receive autologous SCT (77.8% vs. 47.1%; P<0.05). The median overall survival (OS) was 12.6 months (range, 2-38 months) in this study. The patients who received chemotherapy with bortezomib had a significantly longer median OS as compared with the patients who received chemotherapy without bortezomib (19 vs. 6 months; P=0.049). The patients who received autologous SCT also had significantly longer median OS as compared with the patients who did not receive autologous SCT (18 vs. 7 months; P=0.041). The median duration of remission (DOR) was 5 months (range, 0-28 months). The patients who received bortezomib or autologous SCT had significantly longer median DOR than those who did not (P=0.046 and P=0.012, respectively). The patients with abnormalities by FISH had similar OR rates, median OS and median DOR as compared with the patients without abnormalities by FISH and there was no statistically significant difference in OR rate, median OS and median DOR between the patients with EMP and those without. The MM patients with two different λ light chains by IFE may have specific characteristics, and are accompanied by a high incidence of renal dysfunction and EMP. They have a poor prognosis and require novel therapy including bortezomib and autologous SCT.

Optimizing the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment

Renal impairment is a common complication of multiple myeloma. It is found in about 20% to 25% of patients at diagnosis and in ≤ 50% at some point during the disease course. The presence of renal insufficiency diminishes patients' quality of life and has been associated with increased mortality, although the outcomes of patients after successful induction therapy have been comparable to those with normal renal function. Therefore, the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment is a major challenge and should aim to achieve remission in a large proportion of patients. New drugs introduced to treat multiple myeloma during the past decade have an established place in the treatment of patients with renal failure. Bortezomib appears to be most beneficial in this setting and, combined with other drugs, provides a chance for rapid remission and related improvement of renal function. Immunomodulatory drugs such as thalidomide and lenalidomide have also been used successfully in patients with renal insufficiency, although for the latter drug appropriate dose adjustments are necessary. The presence of renal failure is not a contraindication to autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients eligible for this procedure. Among the classic cytotoxic agents, bendamustine, in particular, should be considered for patients with renal insufficiency. Appropriate supportive care is also extremely important in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma and renal failure. It can include plasmapheresis and removal of free light chains with high cut-off hemodialysis, adapted dosages of bisphosphonates, and avoidance of drugs and conditions that can impair renal function.

Bortezomib in patients with renal impairment

Renal failure is a common manifestation of multiple myeloma (MM). Bortezomib is primarily metabolized by cytochrome p450 isoforms. It also has a cytochrome-independent metabolism by excretion through the bile and kidney. Based on our observations, we aimed to explore the efficacy and toxicity profiles of bortezomib in 56 patients with MM, 24 of which had moderate to severe renal failure. Overall response and complete response, as well as very good partial response rates, were comparable between patients with normal renal functions and renal impairment. The median overall survivals for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rates of <60 and ≥60 ml/minute were similar. Although there was a tendency for shorter overall survival along lower estimated glomerular filtration rates, this difference did not reach a statistical significance. Overall and severe adverse events, and dose modification and treatment discontinuation rates were higher in patients with renal impairment. Patients with renal failure had more thrombocytopenia and diarrhea. While thrombocytopenia was mild to moderate and manageable, diarrhea, which led to serious adverse events, was more severe in patients with renal failure who received bortezomib as monotherapy. Bortezomib appears to be active; however, when used alone, it may cause more frequent and severe adverse events in patients with MM and renal failure.

Phase II study of bortezomib-dexamethasone alone or with added cyclophosphamide or lenalidomide for sub-optimal response as second-line treatment for patients with multiple myeloma

This phase II study is the first prospective evaluation of bortezomib-dexamethasone as second-line therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. A total of 163 patients were enrolled to receive four cycles of bortezomib-dexamethasone. Patients were investigator-assessed for response at cycle 5 Day 1, then treated as follows: responding patients received another four cycles of bortezomib-dexamethasone, while patients with stable disease were subsequently randomized to sequential treatment with a further four cycles of bortezomib-dexamethasone alone or with added cyclophosphamide or lenalidomide. The primary end point was response to sequential therapy; however, this could not be evaluated because investigator-assessed response rates to bortezomib-dexamethasone after four cycles were high, and an insufficient number of patients were randomized to sequential treatment per protocol. Among all 163 patients, validated best confirmed response rate was 66%, including 37% complete/very good partial responses; median response duration was 9.7 months. After a median follow up of 16.9 months, median time to progression and progression-free survival were 9.5 and 8.6 months, respectively; estimated 1-year overall survival was 81%. Median glomerular filtration rate improved from baseline during treatment. Among 58 patients with baseline glomerular filtration rate below 50 mL/min, 24 had renal responses. Grade 3/4 adverse events included: thrombocytopenia (17%), anemia (10%), constipation (6%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (5%), and polyneuropathy (5%). Overall, 57% of neuropathy events improved/resolved; median time to improvement was 2.1 months. These findings suggest bortezomib-dexamethasone represents an active, feasible second-line treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma.

Bortezomib, dexamethasone plus thalidomide for treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with or without renal impairment

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of the treatment of the newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) with or without renal impairment receiving the therapy of bortezomib, dexamethasone plus thalidomide (BTD) regimen in order to analyze the effects of BTD regimen on the prognosis of the MM patients with renal impairment compared with the patients without renal impairment.

METHODS

Seventy-two newly diagnosed MM patients entered into our study and all the patients belonged to International Stage System (ISS) 3 in which transplantation patients were excluded or the patients refused receiving transplantation therapy. According to the level of serum creatinine (Scr), the patients were divided into two groups including group 1 (n=42) (Scr <2 mg/dL) and group 2 (n=30) (Scr ≥2 mg/dL). All the patients received the therapy of BTD regimen as induction therapy, and the median treatment time was 5 (range, 2-8) cycles. The outcome was analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The overall remission (OR) rates were 81.0% (group 1) and 80.0% (group 2). There was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). In group 2, 10 patients (33.3%) got renal function reversal, 14 patients (46.7%) got improved renal function and the median time to renal function reversal was 1.4 (range, 0.7-3.0) months. Among 12 patients with hemodialysis at diagnosis, 8 patients got rid of hemodialysis after median 4 cycles of therapy (range, 3-6 cycles). After a median follow-up period of 16 (range, 2-31) months, 5 patients (11.9%) in group 1 died and 9 patients (30.0%) in group 2 died (P=0.056). The 2-year estimate of overall survival was 77.3% in group 1 and 63.8% in group 2, respectively (P=0.188). During a median follow-up time of 13.0 months (range, 2-25 months), 15 patients (35.7%) in group 1 progressed and 13 patients (43.3%) in group 2 progressed (P=0.513). The 2-year estimate of response duration was 50.6% in group 1 and 42.1% in group 2, respectively (P=1). The main toxicities in the two groups included thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy (PN), infection, herpes zoster and so on. The incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events was low.

CONCLUSIONS

BTD regimen may become the front-line therapy for the newly diagnosed MM patients with renal impairment because BTD regimen can improve the prognosis of the patients with renal impairment as good as the patients without renal impairment.

Age and organ damage correlate with poor survival in myeloma patients: meta-analysis of 1435 individual patient data from 4 randomized trials

Thalidomide and bortezomib are extensively used to treat elderly myeloma patients. In these patients, treatment-related side effects are frequent and full drug doses difficult to tolerate. We retrospectively analyzed data from 1435 elderly patients enrolled in 4 European phase III trials including thalidomide and/or bortezomib. After a median follow up of 33 months (95%CI: 10-56 months), 513 of 1435 patients (36%) died; median overall survival was 50 months (95%CI: 46-60 months). The risk of death was increased in patients aged 75 years or over (HR 1.44, 95%CI: 1.20-1.72; P<0.001), in patients with renal failure (HR 2.02, 95%CI: 1.51-2.70; P<0.001), in those who experienced grade 3-4 infections, cardiac or gastrointestinal adverse events during treatment (HR 2.53, 95%CI: 1.75-3.64; P<0.001) and in those who required drug discontinuation due to adverse events (HR 1.67, 95%CI; 1.12-2.51; P=0.01). This increased risk was restricted to the first six months after occurrence of adverse events or drug discontinuation and declined over time. More intensive approaches, such as the combination of bortezomib-thalidomide, negatively affected outcome. Bortezomib-based combinations may overcome the negative impact of renal failure. Age 75 years or over or renal failure at presentation, occurrence of infections, cardiac or gastrointestinal adverse events negatively affected survival. A detailed geriatric assessment, organ evaluation and less intense individualized approaches are suggested in elderly unfit subjects.

Optimizing treatment strategies in myeloma cast nephropathy: rationale for a randomized prospective trial

Renal failure is a frequent complication of multiple myeloma (MM) that strongly affects patient survival. Although a variety of renal diseases may be observed in MM, myeloma cast nephropathy (MCN), a tubulo-interstitial disorder related to precipitation of a monoclonal light chain (LC) within tubular distal lumens, is the main cause of severe and persistent renal failure. To date, the respective frequency and initial evolution of renal disorders associated with monoclonal LC in MM remain poorly defined. Treatment of MCN relies on urgent symptomatic measures and rapid introduction of chemotherapy to reduce the production of monoclonal LC. The introduction of novel chemotherapy regimens based on the association of bortezomib with dexamethasone is likely to have improved the prognosis of MM patients with renal failure. In addition, the combination of novel agents with efficient removal of circulating LC through high cut-off hemodialysis membrane may further increase renal response rate. However, the impact on patient and renal outcomes of these potential therapeutic advances has not been evaluated in prospective studies. The randomized trials EuLITE in the UK and Germany and MYRE in France should help to answer these issues. MYRE is a randomized controlled phase III trial (NCT01208818) that aims to better define the epidemiology and typology of inaugural renal failure in MM and to optimize therapy of MCN patients with and without dialysis-dependent renal failure.

Achieving an early myeloma response in patients with kidney impairment

There is increasing evidence, particularly in severe acute kidney injury, that treatment of multiple myeloma with regimens that include dexamethasone in combination with novel chemotherapy agents are associated with an early disease response in most patients. However, the evidence to guide the optimal chemotherapy regimen in patients with kidney impairment is limited, and treatment choices are complicated by the effect of kidney function on drug dosing. Here, we summarize the current status of this field, with a particular focus on chemotherapy regimens that are based on dexamethasone and novel agents and an outline of those areas in which further work is needed to improve the evidence base.

Evolving chemotherapy options for the treatment of myeloma kidney: a 40-year perspective

Kidney impairment (KI) at the time of initial diagnosis is common in myeloma. The improvement of kidney function and the reversal of KI are of utmost importance. Recent advances have made it possible to reverse acute kidney damage due to myeloma in most patients, at least if treatment is immediately implemented. Immediate antimyeloma therapy and appropriate hydration are the most commonly used treatment modalities for the management of acute KI related to myeloma. Mechanical approaches can only temporarily reduce the free light-chain load, and without effective chemotherapy they are probably not able to significantly improve kidney function. However, the role of mechanical approaches together with effective chemotherapy is still being explored. Thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib have improved the survival of myeloma patients, but they have also improved the outcome of patients presenting with KI. Thalidomide is safe to use on patients with KI without dose adjustments. Lenalidomide needs dose modification, but it can improve kidney function in many patients. Bortezomib seems to be the agent of choice for most patients presenting with KI without dose modifications. This review focuses on the management of patients presenting with "myeloma kidney" using modern chemotherapy approaches, especially novel agents.

Management of myeloma-associated renal dysfunction in the era of novel therapies

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm often associated with renal impairment (RI), with myeloma cast nephropathy recognized as the most common cause. While RI is present in over 50% of MM patients at some point in their disease course, it is associated with higher tumor burden, more aggressive disease, diminished quality of life, development of complications and increased mortality. The introduction of novel therapies, including bortezomib, lenalidomide and thalidomide, has revolutionized the management of MM. They are now considered first-line therapies in induction, maintenance and salvage therapy for MM. In addition to their anti-MM effect, they can improve outcome in patients with RI, especially when combined, and bortezomib with dexamethasone may have a renal protective effect. This review focuses on the use of these agents in patients with MM and RI, and evaluates their efficacy, safety, need for dose adjustment and impact on RI.

Monosomy 13 in metaphase spreads is a predictor of poor long-term outcome after bortezomib plus dexamethasone treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

We retrospectively investigated the prognostic impact of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) on the outcome of treatment with bortezomib plus dexamethasone (BD) in 43 relapsed/refractory (Rel/Ref) multiple myeloma patients. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis identified del(13q) in 25 patients, t(4;14) in 14, t(14;16) in 4, 1q21 abnormality in 12 and del(17p) in 2, while G-banding also detected chromosome 13 monosomy (-13) in metaphase spreads from 7 patients. Eighteen of 25 patients with FISH-detected chromosome 13 abnormalities also exhibited other abnormalities. Median observation period was 510 days, and median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 912 days and 162 days, respectively. Detection of del(13q), t(4;14), t(14;16) or 1q21 abnormalities by FISH and co-occurrence of chromosome 13 abnormality with other abnormalities were not associated with poorer outcomes. In contrast, detection of -13 by G-banding in metaphase spreads showed significant association with shorter OS, although the overall response rate and PFS were not inferior to those for patients without -13 detected by G-banding. BD therapy may be a potent weapon for overcoming most classical high-risk CAs, while the detection of -13 in metaphase spreads may serve as a predictor of highly progressive disease, even when treated with BD.

Novel approaches for reducing free light chains in patients with myeloma kidney

Myeloma kidney is a tubulointerstitial pathology that accounts for approximately 80-90% of severe acute kidney injury in patients with multiple myeloma. Unless there is rapid intervention, progressive irreversible damage from interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy occurs. Work over the past decade has demonstrated that an early sustained reduction in serum concentrations of pathogenic monoclonal free light chains (FLCs) leads to improved renal recovery rates. In turn, an early improvement in renal function is associated with improved patient survival. An early reduction in FLC levels should therefore become standard of care, although the optimum mechanisms to achieve this depletion of FLCs remain to be determined. To provide a coordinated, cross-disciplinary approach to research in this disease, the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group was formed. In this Review, we address the current state of knowledge in the management of myeloma kidney.

Novel therapeutic agents for the management of patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment

Renal impairment is a major complication of multiple myeloma. Patients presenting with severe renal impairment represent a greater therapeutic challenge and generally have poorer outcome. However, once patients with renal impairment achieve remission, their outcomes are comparable with those of patients without renal impairment. Therapies that offer substantial activity in this setting are needed. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide have substantially improved the survival of patients with multiple myeloma. Here we review the pharmacokinetics, activity, and safety of these agents in patients with renal impairment. Bortezomib can be administered at the full approved dose and schedule in renally impaired patients; similarly, no dose reductions are required with thalidomide. The pharmacokinetics of lenalidomide is affected by its renal route of excretion, and dose adjustments are recommended for moderate/severe impairment. Substantial evidence has emerged showing that these novel agents improve outcomes of patients with renal impairment, including impairment reversal. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide (at the recommended doses) are active options for patients with mild to moderate impairment, although limited data are available for thalidomide. Information on lenalidomide-based combinations is still emerging, but the available data indicate considerable activity. Substantial evidence indicates that bortezomib-high-dose dexamethasone with or without a third drug (e.g., cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, or doxorubicin) is an appropriate option for patients with any degree of renal impairment.

Safety and efficacy of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT) versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) in untreated multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment

We assessed efficacy, safety, and reversal of renal impairment (RI) in untreated patients with multiple myeloma given bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide followed by bortezomib-thalidomide (VMPT-VT) maintenance or bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP). Exclusion criteria included serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 mg/dL. In the VMPT-VT/VMP arms, severe RI (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≤ 30 mL/min), moderate RI (eGFR 31-50 mL/min), and normal renal function (eGFR > 50 mL/min), were 6%/7.9%, 24.1%/24.9%, and 69.8%/67.2%, respectively. Statistically significant improvements in overall response rates and progression-free survival were observed in VMPT-VT versus VMP arms across renal cohorts, except in severe RI patients. In the VMPT group, severe RI reduced overall survival (OS). RI was reversed in 16/63 (25.4%) patients receiving VMPT-VT versus 31/77 (40.3%) receiving VMP. Multivariate analysis showed male sex (P = .022) and moderate RI (P = .003) significantly predicted RI recovery. VMP patients achieving renal response showed longer OS. In both arms, greater rates of severe hematologic adverse events were associated with RI (eGFR < 50 mL/min), however, therapy discontinuation rates were unaffected. VMPT-VT was superior to VMP for cases with normal renal function and moderate RI, whereas VMPT-VT failed to outperform VMP in patients with severe RI, although the relatively low number of cases analyzed preclude drawing definitive conclusions. VMPT-VT had no advantage in terms of RI reversal over VMP. This study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01063179.

A systematic review on the use of bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment: what is the published evidence?

This report presents the totality of evidence through a systematic review that assessed either the efficacy or safety of bortezomib-based regimens in multiple myeloma with renal impairment. A systematic and comprehensive search of the literature was performed using MEDLINE databases from 1978 to December 1, 2010, and a hand search of references. We used the following medical subject headings (MESH) to identify potential studies: 'myeloma renal failure' (1,225 hits) and 'bortezomib' (2,554 hits). An additional search performed by combining the MESH terms 'myeloma renal failure' and 'bortezomib' yielded 50 citations. Five additional case-control studies judged relevant for the purpose of study were also included. In total, 6 case reports, 9 case series and 9 case-control studies were identified that reported on myeloma, renal failure and bortezomib. In this review, only the case series and case-control studies were considered. The results of our search led to the following conclusions: (1) bortezomib is feasible and well tolerated and its efficacy and safety are not substantially modified by renal failure patients, (2) renal failure should not induce physicians to reduce doses, since the efficacy of bortezomib is attained also in dialyzed patients who may achieve dialysis independence, and (3) standard doses of bortezomib (i.e. 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, 11) associated with dexamethasone yield satisfactory tumor response, generally obtained shortly after starting therapy. Although many questions remain unanswered, our effort should be considered a relevant scientific and practical address for generating a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm to be used in patients with renal impairment related to multiple myeloma.

Management of hematological malignancies in patients affected by renal failure

The management of hematological malignancies (HM) in renally impaired patients may be a difficult task. Indeed, the kidney represents a major elimination pathway for many chemotherapeutic agents and their metabolites, whose serum levels are not usually measured in daily clinical practice. In addition, many antineoplastic drugs have a narrow therapeutic index for which they require dose adjustment when administered to patients with renal failure. Only limited data regarding the use of chemotherapy in patients with renal impairment and in those on dialysis are available. Indeed, renal patients with HM are often excluded from most clinical trials. Thus far, in order to provide recommendations, we have reviewed the pertinent literature, gathering information from published guidelines regarding chemotherapy in patients with kidney dysfunction and from articles describing the use of individual agents in renal patients with HM.