Administration of activated charcoal or sodium polystyrene sulfonate (Kayexalate) as gastric decontamination for lithium intoxication: an animal model

Systematic review on the use of activated charcoal for gastrointestinal decontamination following acute oral overdose

INTRODUCTION

The use of activated charcoal in poisoning remains both a pillar of modern toxicology and a source of debate. Following the publication of the joint position statements on the use of single-dose and multiple-dose activated charcoal by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the routine use of activated charcoal declined. Over subsequent years, many new pharmaceuticals became available in modified or alternative-release formulations and additional data on gastric emptying time in poisoning was published, challenging previous assumptions about absorption kinetics. The American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology founded the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative to create a framework for evidence-based recommendations for the management of poisoned patients. The activated charcoal workgroup of the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative was tasked with reviewing systematically the evidence pertaining to the use of activated charcoal in poisoning in order to update the previous recommendations.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was: Does oral activated charcoal given to adults or children prevent toxicity or improve clinical outcome and survival of poisoned patients compared to those who do not receive charcoal?  Secondary objectives were to evaluate pharmacokinetic outcomes, the role of cathartics, and adverse events to charcoal administration. This systematic review summarizes the available evidence on the efficacy of activated charcoal.

METHODS

A medical librarian created a systematic search strategy for Medline (Ovid), subsequently translated for Embase (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), BIOSIS Previews (via Ovid), Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library/DARE. All databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2019. There were no language limitations.  One author screened all citations identified in the search based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Excluded citations were confirmed by an additional author and remaining articles were obtained in full text and evaluated by at least two authors for inclusion. All authors cross-referenced full-text articles to identify articles missed in the searches. Data from included articles were extracted by the authors on a standardized spreadsheet and two authors used the GRADE methodology to independently assess the quality and risk of bias of each included study.

RESULTS

From 22,950 titles originally identified, the final data set consisted of 296 human studies, 118 animal studies, and 145 in vitro studies. Also included were 71 human and two animal studies that reported adverse events. The quality was judged to have a Low or Very Low GRADE in 469 (83%) of the studies. Ninety studies were judged to be of Moderate or High GRADE. The higher GRADE studies reported on the following drugs: paracetamol (acetaminophen), phenobarbital, carbamazepine, cardiac glycosides (digoxin and oleander), ethanol, iron, salicylates, theophylline, tricyclic antidepressants, and valproate. Data on newer pharmaceuticals not reviewed in the previous American Academy of Clinical Toxicology/European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists statements such as quetiapine, olanzapine, citalopram, and Factor Xa inhibitors were included. No studies on the optimal dosing for either single-dose or multiple-dose activated charcoal were found. In the reviewed clinical data, the time of administration of the first dose of charcoal was beyond one hour in 97% (n = 1006 individuals), beyond two hours in 36% (n = 491 individuals), and beyond 12 h in 4% (n = 43 individuals) whereas the timing of the first dose in controlled studies was within one hour of ingestion in 48% (n = 2359 individuals) and beyond two hours in 36% (n = 484) of individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review found heterogenous data. The higher GRADE data was focused on a few select poisonings, while studies that addressed patients with unknown and or mixed ingestions were hampered by low rates of clinically meaningful toxicity or death.  Despite these limitations, they reported a benefit of activated charcoal beyond one hour in many clinical scenarios.

Lipid Nanoparticle Formulations for Enhanced Co-delivery of siRNA and mRNA

Although mRNA and siRNA have significant therapeutic potential, their simultaneous delivery has not been previously explored. To facilitate the treatment of diseases associated with aberrant gene upregulation and downregulation, we sought to co-formulate siRNA and mRNA in a single lipidoid nanoparticle (LNP) formulation. We accommodated the distinct molecular characteristics of mRNA and siRNA in a formulation consisting of an ionizable and biodegradable amine-containing lipidoid, cholesterol, DSPC, DOPE, and PEG-lipid. Surprisingly, the co-formulation of siRNA and mRNA in the same LNP enhanced the efficacy of both drugs in vitro and in vivo. Compared to LNPs encapsulating siRNA only, co-formulated LNPs improved Factor VII gene silencing in mice from 44 to 87% at an siRNA dose of 0.03 mg/kg. Co-formulation also improved mRNA delivery, as a 0.5 mg/kg dose of mRNA co-formulated with siRNA induced three times the luciferase protein expression compared to when siRNA was not included. As not all gene therapy applications require both RNA drugs, we sought to extend the benefit of co-formulated LNPs to formulations encapsulating only a single type of RNA. We accomplished this by substituting the "helper" RNA with a negatively charged polymer, polystyrenesulfonate (PSS). LNPs containing PSS mediated the same level of protein silencing or expression as standard LNPs using 2-3-fold less RNA. For example, LNPs formulated with and without PSS induced 50% Factor VII silencing at siRNA doses of 0.01 and 0.03 mg/kg, respectively. Together, these studies demonstrate potent co-delivery of siRNA and mRNA and show that inclusion of a negatively charged "helper polymer" enhances the efficacy of LNP delivery systems.

Lithium Poisoning

Lithium is a commonly prescribed treatment for bipolar affective disorder. However, treatment is complicated by lithium’s narrow therapeutic index and the influence of kidney function, both of which increase the risk of toxicity. Therefore, careful attention to dosing, monitoring, and titration is required. The cause of lithium poisoning influences treatment and 3 patterns are described: acute, acute-on-chronic, and chronic. Chronic poisoning is the most common etiology, is usually unintentional, and results from lithium intake exceeding elimination. This is most commonly due to impaired kidney function caused by volume depletion from lithium-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus or intercurrent illnesses and is also drug-induced. Lithium poisoning can affect multiple organs; however, the primary site of toxicity is the central nervous system and clinical manifestations vary from asymptomatic supratherapeutic drug concentrations to clinical toxicity such as confusion, ataxia, or seizures. Lithium poisoning has a low mortality rate; however, chronic lithium poisoning can require a prolonged hospital length of stay from impaired mobility and cognition and associated nosocomial complications. Persistent neurological deficits, in particular cerebellar, are described and the incidence and risk factors for its development are poorly understood, but it appears to be uncommon in uncomplicated acute poisoning. Lithium is readily dialyzable, and rationale support extracorporeal treatments to reduce the risk or the duration of toxicity in high-risk exposures. There is disagreement in the literature regarding factors that define patients most likely to benefit from treatments that enhance lithium elimination, including specific plasma lithium concentration thresholds. In the case of extracorporeal treatments, there are observational data in its favor, without evidence from randomized controlled trials (none have been performed), which may lead to conservative practices and potentially unnecessary interventions in some circumstances. More data are required to define the risk–benefit of extracorporeal treatments and their use (modality, duration) in the management of lithium poisoning.

Extracorporeal Treatment for Lithium Poisoning: Systematic Review and Recommendations from the EXTRIP Workgroup

The Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning Workgroup was created to provide evidence-based recommendations on the use of extracorporeal treatments in poisoning. Here, the EXTRIP workgroup presents its recommendations for lithium poisoning. After a systematic literature search, clinical and toxicokinetic data were extracted and summarized following a predetermined format. The entire workgroup voted through a two-round modified Delphi method to reach a consensus on voting statements. A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used to quantify disagreement, and anonymous votes were compiled and discussed in person. A second vote was conducted to determine the final workgroup recommendations. In total, 166 articles met inclusion criteria, which were mostly case reports, yielding a very low quality of evidence for all recommendations. A total of 418 patients were reviewed, 228 of which allowed extraction of patient-level data. The workgroup concluded that lithium is dialyzable (Level of evidence=A) and made the following recommendations: Extracorporeal treatment is recommended in severe lithium poisoning (1D). Extracorporeal treatment is recommended if kidney function is impaired and the [Li(+)] is >4.0 mEq/L, or in the presence of a decreased level of consciousness, seizures, or life-threatening dysrhythmias irrespective of the [Li(+)] (1D). Extracorporeal treatment is suggested if the [Li(+)] is >5.0 mEq/L, significant confusion is present, or the expected time to reduce the [Li(+)] to <1.0 mEq/L is >36 hours (2D). Extracorporeal treatment should be continued until clinical improvement is apparent or [Li(+)] is <1.0 mEq/L (1D). Extracorporeal treatments should be continued for a minimum of 6 hours if the [Li(+)] is not readily measurable (1D). Hemodialysis is the preferred extracorporeal treatment (1D), but continuous RRT is an acceptable alternative (1D). The workgroup supported the use of extracorporeal treatment in severe lithium poisoning. Clinical decisions on when to use extracorporeal treatment should take into account the [Li(+)], kidney function, pattern of lithium toxicity, patient's clinical status, and availability of extracorporeal treatments.

Gastrointestinal decontamination in the acutely poisoned patient

Objective

To define the role of gastrointestinal (GI) decontamination of the poisoned patient.

Data Sources

A computer-based PubMed/MEDLINE search of the literature on GI decontamination in the poisoned patient with cross referencing of sources.

Study Selection and Data Extraction

Clinical, animal and in vitro studies were reviewed for clinical relevance to GI decontamination of the poisoned patient.

Data Synthesis

The literature suggests that previously, widely used, aggressive approaches including the use of ipecac syrup, gastric lavage, and cathartics are now rarely recommended. Whole bowel irrigation is still often recommended for slow-release drugs, metals, and patients who "pack" or "stuff" foreign bodies filled with drugs of abuse, but with little quality data to support it. Activated charcoal (AC), single or multiple doses, was also a previous mainstay of GI decontamination, but the utility of AC is now recognized to be limited and more time dependent than previously practiced. These recommendations have resulted in several treatment guidelines that are mostly based on retrospective analysis, animal studies or small case series, and rarely based on randomized clinical trials.

Conclusions

The current literature supports limited use of GI decontamination of the poisoned patient.

Successful treatment of lithium toxicity with sodium polystyrene sulfonate: a retrospective cohort study

CONTEXT

Lithium (Li) is a first-line treatment for bipolar disorder but has a narrow therapeutic index. Treatment of Li toxicity includes supportive measures and hemodialysis in severe cases, but this modality is not always immediately available. Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS, Kayexalate), a cation exchanger, has been promising in animal models and human reports to reduce absorption and enhance elimination of Li.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. All cases of chronic Li intoxication were reviewed in two adult-care hospitals from 2000 to 2009. A group comparison and a within-patient comparison were performed to compare the effect of SPS on the median Li half-life (T(1/2)). For this study, at least three serum Li levels were required for T(1/2) calculations.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients met inclusion requirements, 12 of whom had taken SPS. Median Li T(1/2) in the treated and control groups was 20.5 and 43.2 hours, respectively (p = 0.0006). In the 12 treated patients, Li T(1/2) during SPS was on average 48.9% shorter than without SPS. Furthermore, in one subject in whom urinary Li data were available, Li clearance with SPS was superior to Li renal clearance. Prolonged constipation was noted in one patient whereas mild hypokalemia was noted in six patients treated with SPS.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that SPS reduced Li T(1/2) and suggests that SPS is capable of promoting Li elimination in chronic intoxications. These results warrant a prospective trial looking at the use of SPS in the treatment of Li overdose as an adjunct to supportive measures and hemodialysis.

Evaluation of available treatment guidelines for the management of lithium intoxication

Intoxications with lithium carry considerable risk for long-term morbidity and even mortality. Consequently, any patient suspected of lithium intoxication requires immediate and appropriate care. The objectives of this study were to assess the completeness and the applicability of generally available treatment guidelines for the management of patients with a lithium intoxication and, hence, to provide general recommendations for improvement of existing treatment guidelines. Nineteen treatment guidelines originating from 7 different countries were gathered by searching the Internet, online databases, and textbooks and by contacting different poison information centers and university medical centers. A list of items was composed from the retrieved treatment guidelines and a further literature search. Most relevant items were present in the various guidelines. However, in some guidelines, essential information was missing or potentially hazardous information was provided. Clarity, presentation, and applicability of the guidelines, as assessed using parts of the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation instrument, were relatively poor. Regular updates of treatment guidelines should be performed to incorporate new essential information. To improve applicability of guidelines, unambiguous key recommendations, alternative treatments, and special care requirements should be provided and authors are recommended to test treatment guidelines using a panel of less experienced caregivers in a hypothetical case scenario.

Management of Lithium Toxicity

Lithium salts have been used in the prophylaxis and treatment of depression and bipolar disorder for >50 years. Lithium has a narrow therapeutic range, and several well characterised adverse effects limit the potential usefulness of higher doses. Acute ingestion in lithium-naive patients is generally associated with only short-lived exposure to high concentrations, due to extensive distribution of lithium throughout the total body water compartment. Conversely, chronic toxicity and acute-on-therapeutic ingestion are associated with prolonged exposure to higher tissue concentrations and, therefore, greater toxicity. Lithium toxicity may be life threatening, or result in persistent cognitive and neurological impairment. Therefore, enhanced lithium clearance has been explored as a means of minimising exposure to high tissue concentrations. Although haemodialysis is highly effective in removing circulating lithium, serum concentrations often rebound so repeated or prolonged treatment may be required. Continuous arteriovenous haemodiafiltration and continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration increase lithium clearance, albeit to a lesser extent than haemodialysis, and are more widely accessible. Haemodiafiltration sustained for >16 hours allows effective removal of total body lithium, thereby avoiding rebound effects. Enhanced elimination should be considered in patients at greatest risk of severe poisoning: namely those with chronic or acute-on-therapeutic toxicity, those with clinically significant features, and those with chronic toxicity whose serum lithium concentration is >2.5 mmol/L. The choice between haemodialysis and continuous haemodiafiltration techniques will depend on local accessibility and urgency of enhancing lithium elimination. Further research is required to establish the potential benefits of assisted elimination on clinical outcome in patients with lithium poisoning.

The role of activated charcoal and gastric emptying in gastrointestinal decontamination: a state-of-the-art review

Gastrointestinal decontamination has been practiced for hundreds of years; however, only in the past few years have data emerged that demonstrate a clinical benefit in some patients. Because most potentially toxic ingestions involve agents that are not toxic in the quantity consumed, the exact circumstances in which decontamination is beneficial and which methods are most beneficial in those circumstances remain important topics of research. Maximum benefit from decontamination is expected in patients who present soon after the ingestion. Unfortunately, many overdose patients present at least 2 hours after taking a medication, when most of the toxin has been absorbed or has moved well into the intestine, beyond the expected reach of gastrointestinal decontamination. Decontamination probably does not contribute to the outcome of many such patients, especially those without symptoms. However, if absorption has been delayed or gastrointestinal motility has been slowed, activated charcoal may reduce the final amount absorbed. The use of activated charcoal in these cases may be beneficial and is associated with few complications. Therefore, administration of activated charcoal is recommended as soon as possible after emergency department presentation, unless the agent and quantity are known to be nontoxic, the agent is known not to adsorb to activated charcoal, or the delay has been so long that absorption is probably complete. The use of gastric emptying in addition to activated charcoal has generated intense debate. Several large comparative studies have failed to demonstrate a benefit of gastric emptying before activated charcoal. Because complications of such 2-step decontamination include a higher rate of intubation, aspiration, and ICU admission, gastric emptying in addition to activated charcoal cannot be considered the routine approach to patients. However, there are several infrequent circumstances in which the data are inadequate to accurately assess the potential benefit of gastric emptying in addition to activated charcoal: symptomatic patients presenting in the first hour after ingestion, symptomatic patients who have ingested agents that slow gastrointestinal motility, patients taking sustained release medications, and those taking massive or life-threatening amounts of medication. These circumstances represent only a small subset of ingestions. In the absence of convincing data about benefit or lack of benefit of gastric emptying for these patients, individual physicians must act on a personal valuation: Is it better to use a treatment that might have some benefit but definitely has some risk or not to use a treatment that has any risk unless there is proven benefit?

Potassium repletion fails to interfere with reduction of serum lithium by sodium polystyrene sulfonate in mice

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have shown that oral sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) lowers serum lithium concentrations after acute and chronic toxic lithium exposures. Because hypokalemia may represent a deterrent to the clinical use of SPS for lithium intoxication, this study was designed to determine whether potassium (K+) repletion interferes with the effect of SPS on serum lithium.

METHODS

168 male, CD-1 mice were given lithium chloride (LiCl) (250 mg/kg) by gavage at time 0. Half of the mice were then given SPS (5 g/kg/dose) and half an equivalent volume of water by gavage at times 20 and 40 minutes. Half of each of these subgroups was then given potassium chloride (KCl) (3 mmol/kg) intraperitoneally and half an equivalent volume of normal saline. The animals were then sacrificed at one, two, four, and eight hours after lithium administration and the sera were analyzed for lithium and K+ by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The groups were compared with analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The SPS lowered both lithium and K+ concentrations (ps < or = 0.0001). The KCl treatment was associated with transiently increased K+ concentrations (p < 0.0001) and with mildly elevated lithium concentrations when compared with the results of the animals not treated with KCl (p = 0.0016). The KCl treatment-associated increase in lithium concentration occurred both in the animals treated with water and in those treated with SPS.

CONCLUSIONS

Potassium repletion did not interfere with the ability of SPS to lower serum lithium concentration in animals experimentally poisoned with lithium.

Use of sodium polystyrene sulfonate for reduction of plasma lithium concentrations after chronic lithium dosing in mice

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have shown that oral sodium polystyrene sulfonate lowers plasma lithium concentrations after acutely administered oral doses of lithium chloride. However, a significant proportion of lithium overdose cases resulting in morbidity and mortality are those in which exposure to lithium is chronic. This study was designed to determine whether multiple oral doses of sodium polystyrene sulfonate are effective in reducing plasma lithium concentrations after chronic dosing.

DESIGN

Placebo-controlled animal study.

INTERVENTIONS

One hundred thirty mice were given 75 mM lithium chloride in their drinking water for a period of 14 days. At the end of that period, half of the animals were given orogastric sodium polystyrene sulfonate at 5 g/kg/dose 0, 60, 120, 180, and 360 minutes after the cessation of lithium chloride; the remaining half received orogastric water at equivalent times. Subgroups of each group were sacrificed at 90, 150, 330, 480, 1440, and 2880 minutes after lithium chloride cessation and plasma analyzed for lithium content. Lithium concentrations were compared by analysis of variance and single degree of freedom contrasts. Significance was set at an alpha level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Lithium concentration was lower overall in the animals treated with sodium polystyrene sulfonate (p < .0001) and specifically at 150, 330, and 480 minutes after lithium chloride cessation (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Repetitive oral doses of sodium polystyrene sulfonate effectively lowered plasma lithium concentrations. Further study may ultimately define a role for the use of sodium polystyrene sulfonate in the treatment of patients with chronic lithium toxicity.

Position statement: single-dose activated charcoal. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists

In preparing this Position Statement, all relevant scientific literature was identified and reviewed critically by acknowledged experts using agreed criteria. Well-conducted clinical and experimental studies were given precedence over anecdotal case reports and abstracts were not usually considered. A draft Position Statement was then produced and subjected to detailed peer review by an international group of clinical toxicologists chosen by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. The Position Statement went through multiple drafts before being approved by the boards of the two societies and being endorsed by other societies. The Position Statement includes a summary statement for ease of use and is supported by detailed documentation which describes the scientific evidence on which the Statement is based. Single-dose activated charcoal should not be administered routinely in the management of poisoned patients. Based on volunteer studies, the effectiveness of activated charcoal decreases with time; the greatest benefit is within 1 hour of ingestion. The administration of activated charcoal may be considered if a patient has ingested a potentially toxic amount of a poison (which is known to be adsorbed to charcoal) up to 1 hour previously; there are insufficient data to support or exclude its use after 1 hour of ingestion. There is no evidence that the administration of activated charcoal improves clinical outcome. Unless a patient has an intact or protected airway, the administration of charcoal is contraindicated.

Enhancement of lithium elimination by multiple-dose sodium polystyrene sulfonate

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether multiple doses of sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) enhance the elimination of IV-administered lithium (Li).

METHODS

The study was a placebo-controlled, investigator-unblinded, murine trial of multiple doses of SPS on serum Li concentrations. Seventy-five male CD-1 mice were given IV pretreatment with LiCl (125 mg/ kg) followed by gavage treatments with SPS (5 g/kg/dose) 20, 40, 90, 150, and 210 minutes after LiCl (experimental group) or deionized water at equivalent times (control group). Subgroups of each treatment group were sacrificed at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after LiCl administration and blood was collected for Li analysis.

RESULTS

Statistical analyses indicated that the SPS group had lower serum Li concentrations overall than did the control animals. This difference was apparent at the 2-, 4-, and 6-hour time points.

CONCLUSION

In this murine model, repetitive doses of orogastric SPS enhanced the elimination of parenterally administered Li.

Lithium poisoning treated by high-performance continuous arteriovenous and venovenous hemodiafiltration

Intermittent hemodialysis is considered the modality of choice when enhanced lithium removal is indicated. However, postdialysis rebound in serum lithium concentration is frequently observed after the dialysis sessions and results from incomplete intracellular removal. Continuous renal replacement therapy could provide a more gradual and complete lithium removal since it is performed over longer time periods, thus avoiding rebound following therapy. Seven patients presenting with symptomatic lithium intoxication were treated by continuous renal replacement therapy (continuous arteriovenous and venovenous hemodiafiltration [CAVHDF and CVVHDF]). For CAVHDF, the dialysate flow rate was increased to 4 L/hr to optimize solute clearances. Five intoxicated patients (four acute and one chronic) were treated by high dialysate flow rate (HDFR) (4 L/hr) CAVHDF and two patients with chronic poisoning were treated by CVVHDF, one with a dialysate flow rate of 1 L/hr and one with a dialysate flow rate of 2 L/hr. Serum lithium concentrations for the four acute poisoning cases were 4.0, 4.6, 4.4, and 3.2 mEq/L, at initiation of HDFR CAVHDF, and decreased respectively to 1.2, 0.8, 1.2, and 1.1 mEq/L after 15, 19, 35, and 21 hours of treatment. No lithium rebound was observed over 24 to 36 hours following CAVHDF. For the three chronic intoxication cases, serum lithium concentrations dropped from 1.7, 2.2, and 3.8 mEq/L to 0.7, 0.17, and 0.4 mEq/L, respectively, after 18, 42, and 44 hours of HDFR CAVHDF or CVVHDF. The chronic case treated for only 18 hours presented a slight rebound in lithium level (0.3 mEq/L), whereas no significant rebound was observed for the two other cases treated for longer periods. Mean +/- SEM dialyser urea, lithium, and creatinine clearance during HDFR CAVHDF were 50.5 +/- 5.0, 41.4 +/- 4.6, and 37.6 +/- 3.7 mL/min, respectively (number of measurements = 41). Dialyser lithium clearance during CVVHDF was 48.4 +/- 1.4 mL/min (n = 10) and 61.9 +/- 2.3 mL/min (n = 7), with dialysate flow rates of 1 and 2 L/hr, respectively. Mean dialyzer lithium removal for the seven cases was 106.4 mEq, while mean renal lithium removal was 21.5 mEq during the same period. We conclude that HDFR CAVHDF and CVVHDF are effective alternatives to intermittent hemodialysis for treatment of lithium poisoning. They provide excellent lithium clearances (60 to 85 L/d); in addition, because of their continuous nature, they prevent posttherapy lithium rebound by allowing a more gradual and complete removal from intracellular compartments, and they may be particularly useful in chronic poisoning in which intracellular lithium accumulation is more extensive.

Falsely elevated lithium levels in plasma samples obtained in lithium containing tubes

CASE REPORT

We present a case of lithium poisoning in a 15-month-old child. Delayed elevation of the plasma lithium concentration at 13 hours after admission to a hospital was noted. This appeared to be factitiously related to the collection of samples in a speckled green top tube which contains lithium heparin as an anticoagulant.

CONCLUSION

This type of false elevation has not been reported in the medical literature. A follow-up study in five healthy volunteers showed that the lithium concentrations of plasma samples obtained in speckled green top tubes are increased by approximately 1.5 mEq/L (1.5 mmol/L).

Effect of delayed treatment with sodium polystyrene sulfonate on serum lithium concentrations in mice

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) in lowering serum lithium (Li) concentrations. Specifically, to determine the effects of both different doses of SPS and different times to treatment with SPS on serum Li levels.

METHODS

The study was a controlled, single-dose murine trial of SPS on serum Li levels. Male CD-1 mice (n = 525) were given orogastric LiCl and then divided into three main treatment groups: group SPS received a single orogastric administration of SPS in a dose of 5 gm/kg body weight at either 0, 15, 30, 45, or 90 minutes after LiCl; group half-SPS received a single orogastric administration of SPS in a dose of 2.5 gm/kg body weight at times equivalent to those of group SPS; and the control group received orogastric deionized water in a volume equivalent to that of group SPS at 0, 15, 30, 45, or 90 minutes after LiCl. Subgroups of seven to ten mice in each of the four treatment groups were sacrificed at one, two, four, and eight hours after administration of LiCl, and their blood was analyzed for Li concentration.

RESULTS

1) Single doses of SPS significantly lowered serum Li concentrations; 2) this effect was dose-related; 3) the delays in administration of SPS used in this study did not significantly reduce its ability to lower serum Li concentrations; and 4) even when administered after peak serum Li concentrations had been achieved, a single dose of SPS was effective in lowering serum Li levels.

CONCLUSIONS

SPS may be efficacious in the treatment for Li toxicity under certain circumstances, even when there is delay to treatment. Additional study is warranted to further characterize the ability of SPS to alter Li kinetics.

Methamphetamine toxicity prevented by activated charcoal in a mouse model

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of activated charcoal in preventing toxicity from oral methamphetamine HCI.

DESIGN

Randomized, prospective, nonblinded, controlled animal study.

SETTING

Animal care facility.

PARTICIPANTS

CD-1 male mice.

INTERVENTIONS

Mice were given 100 mg/kg methamphetamine HCI (lethal dose 60) in water by oral gavage. Within 1 minute of methamphetamine administration, mice received either 1 g/kg activated charcoal or an equivalent volume of water as control.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mice were observed for time to onset of symptoms (piloerection, agitation, and tremor) and mortality at 1, 24, and 48 hours. Activated charcoal delayed onset of symptoms (5.53 +/- 1.25 minutes versus 4.27 +/- 1.22 minutes, P < .002) and decreased mortality compared to controls at 1 hour (1 of 20 versus 10 of 20, P < .003) and 24 hours (five of 20 versus 12 of 20, P < .05). There was no difference between groups in mortality at 48 hours.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of activated charcoal given after oral methamphetamine delayed onset of toxicity and decreased early mortality in mice. There was no effect on overall mortality.

Use of sodium polystyrene sulfonate in a lithium overdose

A 23-year-old woman with an acute-on-chronic lithium overdose received multiple oral doses of sodium polystyrene sulfonate totaling 150 g over a 24-hour period. During the 33 hours after the institution of therapy, the serum lithium level decreased from 4.20 to 0.68 mEq/L. The calculated serum lithium elimination half-life of 12 hours is significantly shorter than that previously noted in other similar overdoses, and the patient suffered no adverse effects of therapy. Multiple-dose sodium polystyrene sulfonate may be useful in lowering the serum lithium level of select patients with acute lithium overdoses but is not a substitute for hemodialysis in severely ill patients.

Multiple-dose sodium polystyrene sulfonate in lithium intoxication: an animal model

Previous work in our laboratory has demonstrated that sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) significantly lowered serum lithium (Li) concentrations when administered in a single oral dose after an oral dose of lithium in a mouse model. The present study was designed to determine whether: 1) repetitive doses of SPS are effective in lowering serum lithium concentrations, 2) the effect of SPS on lithium concentration is dose related and 3) SPS enhances the elimination of lithium. Mice (N = 144) were given orogastric LiCl (250 mg/kg) and then divided into 4 groups: Controls received water 0, 30, 90, 180, and 360 min. after LiCl; the Full-Dose SPS Group received SPS (5 g/kg/dose) at equivalent times; the Half-Dose SPS Group received SPS (2.5 g/kg/dose) at the same times; and the Elimination Group received water at 0 and 30 min. after LiCl and SPS at 90, 180 and 360 min. after LiCl. Subgroups of each group were sacrificed at 1, 2, 4 and 8 hr post-treatment and serum analyzed for lithium concentrations. Statistical analyses revealed that, when compared to Controls: 1) SPS significantly lowered serum lithium concentrations; 2) this effect was dose-related; 3) repetitive dosing of SPS appears to enhance the elimination of lithium.