Does blockade of angiotensin II receptors offer clinical benefits over inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme?

Losartan and metabolite EXP3179 activate endothelial function without lowering blood pressure in AT2 receptor KO mice

BACKGROUND

We have documented profound release of nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarization factor (EDHF) by angiotensin II (ANGII) receptor 1 (AT1) blocker (ARB) losartan and its unique metabolite EXP3179, a pleiotropic effect that may help rationalize the protective properties of ARBs. Since blood pressure (BP) lowering by ARBs likely require an ANGII-dependent switch from AT1 to ANGII receptor 2 (AT2) signaling, a receptor known to stimulate endothelial NO release, we investigated the contribution of AT1 and AT2 to losartan and EXP3179's endothelial function-activating properties.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Two AT1 ligands were used in an attempt to block the AT1-dependent endothelium-enhancing effects of EXP3179. AT2-null mice were used to evaluate the acute ex vivo and chronic in vivo effects of EXP3179 (20μM) and losartan (0.6 g/l), respectively, on endothelial function, BP and aortic stiffness.

KEY RESULTS

Ex vivo blockade of AT1 receptors did not attenuate EXP3179's effects on NO and EDHF-dependent endothelial function activation. We observed significant reductions in PE-induced contractility with EXP3179 in both WT and AT2 knockout (KO) aortic rings. In vivo, a 1-month chronic treatment with losartan did not affect pulse wave velocity (PWV) but decreased PE-induced contraction by 74.9 % in WT (p < 0.0001) and 47.3 % in AT2 KO (p < 0.05). Presence of AT2 was critical to losartan's BP lowering activity.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to BP lowering, the endothelial function-enhancing effects of losartan and EXP3179 are mostly independent of the classic ANGII/AT1/AT2 pathway, which sheds light on ARB pleiotropism.

Angiotensin type 1 receptor mediates renal production and conversion of prostaglandins E2 to F2α in conscious diabetic rats

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies demonstrated that stimulation of angiotensin subtype 1 receptor (AT1R) led to increased renal generation of prostaglandins E2 (PGE2) and renal inflammation. In turn, PGE2 increases AT1R activity. The conversion of PGE2 to the less active metabolite prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) via 9-ketoreductase interrupts this feedback loop. The effects of diabetes on the interface between AT1R, PGE2 and PGF2α are not well established. We hypothesized that in diabetes, an aberrant AT1R activity enhances the biosynthesis of PGE2 and impairs the activity of PGE 9-ketoreductase, leading to accumulation of PGE2.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using microdialysis technique, we monitored renal interstitial fluid levels of angiotensin II (Ang II), PGE2 and PGF2α in control and AT1R blocker, valsartan, treated diabetic rats (N=8 each). We utilized the PGF2α to PGE2 ratio as indirect measure of PGE 9-ketoreductase activity.

RESULTS

Diabetes increased renal interstitial fluid levels of Ang II, PGE2 and PGF2α. PGF2α/PGE2 ratio increased by the third week, but declined by the sixth week of diabetes. Valsartan reduced PGE2 and PGF2α levels and increased Ang II and the conversion of PGE2 to PGF2α.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that in diabetes, AT1R increases PGE2 generation and reduces conversion of PGE2 to PGF2α with the progression of diabetes.

The anteroventral third ventricle region is critical for the behavioral desensitization caused by repeated injections of angiotensin II

A single central injection of angiotensin II (AngII) potently increases water intake; however, a growing body of research suggests that repeated, acute intracerebroventricular injections of AngII cause a reduction in the dipsogenic response to subsequent AngII. This AngII-induced behavioral desensitization is specific to the effects of angiotensin and mediated by the angiotensin type-1 (AT1) receptor. The neuroanatomical substrate for this phenomenon, however, remains unknown. The anteroventral third ventricle (AV3V) region is an important site for the behavioral and physiological actions of AngII. Therefore, we hypothesized that this region also mediates the effects of repeated central AngII administration. In support of this hypothesis, we found that repeated injections of AngII into the AV3V reduced water intake stimulated by a test injection of AngII given into this region. Moreover, repeated AngII injections in the AV3V reduced water intake after AngII was injected into the lateral ventricle. These studies also demonstrate that activation of the AT1 receptor within the AV3V is required for AngII-induced behavioral desensitization because direct injection of the AT1 receptor antagonist, losartan, into the AV3V blocked the desensitizing effect of repeated AngII injections into the lateral ventricle. These findings provide additional support for a role of the AV3V in the dipsogenic actions of AngII, and suggest that this region is critical for the desensitization that occurs after acute repeated central injections of AngII.

Anti-angiotensin therapy: new perspectives

Activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of heart failure. Thus, strategies for the treatment of heart failure have focused on agents that block the RAS. More recently, the role of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in heart failure therapy has been better defined. This article examines the rationale and role of ARBs in the treatment of patients with heart failure on the basis of evidence from clinical trials.

Valsartan in the treatment of heart attack survivors

Survivors of myocardial infarction (MI) are at high risk of disability and death. This is due to infarct-related complications such as heart failure, cardiac remodeling with progressive ventricular dilation, dysfunction, and hypertrophy, and arrhythmias including ventricular and atrial fibrillation. Angiotensin (Ang) II, the major effector molecule of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) is a major contributor to these complications. RAAS inhibition, with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were first shown to reduce mortality and morbidity after MI. Subsequently, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), that produce more complete blockade of the effects of Ang II at the Ang II type 1 (AT₁) receptor, were introduced and the ARB valsartan was shown to be as effective as an ACE inhibitor in reducing mortality and morbidity in high-risk post-MI suvivors with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and and/or heart failure and in heart failure patients, respectively, in two major trials (VALIANT and Val-HeFT). Both these trials used an ACE inhibitor as comparator on top of background therapy. Evidence favoring the use of valsartan for secondary prevention in post-MI survivors is reviewed.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor 1166A/C polymorphism in association with blood pressure response to exogenous angiotensin II

BACKGROUND

The angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) 1166A/C polymorphism is reported to be implicated in cardiovascular diseases. The association between the 1166A/C polymorphism and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) changes in response to exogenous angiotensin II and valsartan was evaluated by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling.

METHODS

Thirteen normotensive, healthy adults (six with the 1166A/A polymorphism and seven with 1166A/C) were enrolled in this clinical study. Angiotensin II was infused continuously over a 2-min period at four different rates (from 5 ng/kg/min and increased by 5 ng/kg/min) at 0 (before valsartan dosing), 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after a single oral dose of valsartan (40 mg). BP was measured serially before and at the end of each rate of angiotensin II infusion. Plasma concentration-time profiles of valsartan were established over a 24-h period. We analyzed data using NONMEM and studied the relationship between the AT1R 1166A/C genotypes and BP responses.

RESULTS

Plasma valsartan concentrations and DBP data best fitted into a two-compartment linear model and E(max) model (E(max) with baseline for angiotensin II and inhibitory E(max) for valsartan), respectively. The ED50 for angiotensin II in the subjects with 1166A/C [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.30 approximately 14.02 ng/kg/min] was significantly lower than in those with 1166A/A (95% CI: 14.23 approximately 28.77 ng/kg/min), while the E(max) for angiotensin II and EC50 for valsartan was similar in both genotype groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that exogenous human angiotensin II increases the BP more potently in subjects with 1166A/C than in those with 1166A/A.

Future pharmacologic agents for treatment of heart failure in children

The addition of new agents to the armamentarium of treatment options for heart failure in pediatric patients is exciting and challenging. Administration of these therapies to pediatric patients will require careful scrutiny of the data and skilled application. Developmental changes in drug metabolism, excretion, and distribution are concerning in pediatric patients, and inappropriate evaluation of these parameters can have disastrous results. Manipulation of the neurohormonal pathways in heart failure has been the target of most recently developed pharmacologic agents. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), aldosterone antagonists, beta-blockers, and natriuretic peptides are seeing increased use in pediatrics. In particular, calcium sensitizing agents represent a new frontier in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure and may replace traditional inotropic therapies. Endothelin receptor antagonists have shown benefit in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension, but their use in heart failure is still debatable. Vasopressin antagonists, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, and neutral endopeptidase inhibitors are also targeting aspects of the neurohormonal cascade that are currently not completely understood. The future of pharmacologic therapies will include pharmacogenomic studies on new and preexisting therapies for pediatric heart failure. The education and skill of the practitioner when applying these agents in pediatric heart failure is of utmost importance.

AT2 receptors contribute to acute blood pressure-lowering and vasodilator effects of AT1 receptor antagonism in conscious normotensive but not hypertensive rats

The aims of this study were to determine the contribution of the AT2 receptor to the antihypertensive and regional vasodilatory effects of AT1 receptor blockade in adult spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), 2-kidney, 1-clip hypertensive (2K1C) rats, and sham-operated normotensive rats. Several studies have provided evidence to support the notion that the AT2 receptor may have opposing effects to those mediated by the AT1 receptor. We therefore tested the hypothesis that the depressor and vasodilator effects of acute AT1 receptor blockade are dependent on AT2 receptor activation. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and regional hemodynamics were measured over a 4-day protocol in rats that received the following treatments in randomized order: saline vehicle, the AT1 receptor antagonist candesartan (0.1 mg/kg iv bolus), the AT2 receptor antagonist PD-123319 (50 μg·kg−1·min−1), or both antagonists. Intravenous candesartan reduced mean arterial pressure in all groups of rats, and this was accompanied by renal and mesenteric vasodilation. Neither saline nor PD-123319 significantly affected these variables. Concomitant PD-123319 administration partially reversed the depressor and mesenteric vasodilator effects of candesartan in sham-operated normotensive rats but not in SHR or 2K1C rats. These data indicate that the AT2 receptor contributes to the blood pressure-lowering and mesenteric vasodilator effects of AT1 receptor blockade in the acute setting in conscious normotensive but not hypertensive rats.

Comparison of telmisartan versus losartan: meta-analysis of titration-to-response studies

OBJECTIVES

To compare the ability of telmisartan and losartan to reduce mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) during the last 6 h of the 24-h dosing interval in a prospectively planned meta-analysis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data from two independent studies.

METHODS

Data were from two independent randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, titration-to-response studies conducted in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension (seated cuff DBP 95-109 mmHg, 24-h mean ambulatory DBP >or=85 mmHg). After a 4-week placebo run-in period, patients received once-daily telmisartan 40 mg or losartan 50 mg, with up-titration after 4 weeks to telmisartan 80 mg or losartan 100 mg, respectively, if seated trough cuff DBP >or=90 mmHg. Blood pressures were recorded using ABPM immediately before randomization and after 8 weeks of active treatment. In addition, seated trough cuff blood pressures were measured at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks of active treatment.

RESULTS

Titration to the higher dose was required in 60.1% of telmisartan patients and 69.5% of losartan patients (P=0.01). Reductions from baseline in the last 6 h mean ambulatory DBP with telmisartan and losartan were 6.6+/-0.4 and 5.1+/-0.4 mmHg, respectively (P<0.01, adjusted for baseline and study); the effects were homogeneous across the two studies. During the last 6 h of the 24-h dosing interval, telmisartan produced greater reductions in each of the observed hourly mean ambulatory DBP values. Telmisartan-induced reductions were also greater for the majority of the observed hourly mean ambulatory DBP values over the entire 24-h dosing interval. Reductions from baseline in the last 6 h adjusted mean ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) for telmisartan and losartan were 9.9+/-0.6 and 7.8+/-0.6 mmHg, respectively (P=0.01). The 24-h profiles of ambulatory SBP hourly mean reductions were similar to those for DBP. Both telmisartan and losartan were found to be safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Telmisartan 40/80 mg is superior to losartan 50/100 mg in controlling DBP and SBP during the last 6 h of the 24-h dosing interval.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers and cardiovascular outcomes: what does the future hold?

The ability of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) to lower blood pressure (BP) is well established. ACE inhibitors (ACE-Is) have also been shown to improve the prognosis of a broad range of patients at high cardiovascular risk, including those with heart failure, post-myocardial infarction (MI), and nephropathy. These benefits suggest that interrupting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) with ACE-Is has a widespread vasculoprotective effect, provided that BP is also adequately controlled. Evidence that RAAS blockade by ARBs also improves long-term clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease has started to accumulate, and will be tested further during the coming years as a number of large-scale, prospective trials are completed. These trials are investigating the long-term protective effects of ARBs on morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, acute MI, or established vascular disease. The results should establish the extent to which ARBs exhibit the vasculoprotective properties demonstrated by ACE-Is in patients at high cardiovascular risk. If ARBs are found to provide benefits that are similar to, or even greater than ACE-Is, it may have important implications for drug selection, given the excellent tolerability of ARBs. Some studies are also investigating whether more extensive RAAS blockade using a combination of an ARB and an ACE-I will offer even greater protection than either agent alone.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers in heart failure

Heart failure remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, despite major advances in therapy. Angiotensin II, the principal mediator of the renin-angiotensin system, exerts both short-term (e.g., hemodynamic, renal) and long-term (e.g., inflammation, cardiac remodeling) effects in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. The effects of angiotensin II appear to be more completely inhibited by angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), which act at the subtype 1 receptor level, than by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors because pathways other than that of ACE contribute to the generation of angiotensin II. Evidence demonstrates that ARBs, when added to conventional treatment for patients with heart failure, are associated with a reduction in morbidity and mortality as well as an improvement in quality of life. Clinical trials of ARB therapy indicate that these agents are generally well tolerated, both alone and in combination with other neurohormonal inhibitors. The current role of ARBs in heart failure is as an alternative for patients who cannot tolerate therapy with an ACE inhibitor. A number of ongoing clinical studies are likely to further define or expand the role of ARBs in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.

ABPM comparison of the anti-hypertensive profiles of telmisartan and enalapril in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension

In this multicentre, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) study, the efficacy of 12 weeks' treatment with once-daily telmisartan 40-80 mg and enalapril 10-20 mg was evaluated using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in 522 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Patients were titrated to the higher dose of study drug at week 6 if mean seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was > or = 90 mmHg. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in ambulatory DBP in the last 6 h of the 24-h dosing interval after 12 weeks' treatment. Telmisartan and enalapril produced similar reductions from baseline in DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) over all ABPM periods evaluated (last 6 h, 24-h, daytime and night-time). Telmisartan produced a significantly greater reduction in mean seated trough DBP, measured unblinded with an automated ABPM device in the clinic, amounting to a difference of -2.02 mmHg (P < 0.01). A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved a seated diastolic response with telmisartan than enalapril (59% versus 50%; P < 0.05), also measured with the same ABPM device. Both treatments were well tolerated. Compared with telmisartan, enalapril was associated with a higher incidence of cough (8.9% versus 0.8%) and hypotension (3.9% versus 1.1%). Therefore, telmisartan may provide better long-term compliance and, consequently, better blood pressure control than enalapril.

AT2 receptor-mediated relaxation is preserved after long-term AT1 receptor blockade

Angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R) stimulation may cause vasodilation per se and may contribute to the antihypertensive effect produced by Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonists, given that AT1R blockade increases endogenous levels of Ang II, suggesting a physiological role for the unblocked AT2R. Thus, we first directly assessed whether or not there is desensitization to AT2R-mediated vasorelaxation because this is an important consideration, given the raised Ang II levels and the marked desensitization that is known to occur after AT1R stimulation. Second, we examined if AT2R-mediated vasorelaxation is preserved after long-term treatment with the AT1R antagonist candesartan cilexetil. Consecutive concentration-response curves to AT2R stimulation, with either Ang II (with AT1R blockade) or the selective agonist CGP42112, were studied in rat isolated mesenteric resistance arteries mounted in an arteriograph. AT2R stimulation with Ang II induced a concentration-dependent relaxation without desensitization. Similarly, CGP42112 evoked highly reproducible relaxation, which, like Ang II, was abolished by the AT2R antagonist PD123319. By contrast, AT1R-mediated contraction exhibited marked desensitization. In rats treated with candesartan cilexetil (2 mg/kg per day for 2 weeks), AT1R-mediated contraction was abolished, whereas AT2R-mediated relaxation evoked by either Ang II or CGP42112 was highly reproducible, PD123319-sensitive, and of a magnitude similar to that observed in naïve animals. Therefore, this study has provided unequivocal evidence for the reproducible nature of AT2R-mediated vasorelaxation during short-term and long-term AT1R blockade. Such preservation of AT2R function is a prerequisite for the consideration of physiological role(s) of AT2R during AT1R blockade.

Recent advances in angiotensin II signaling

Angiotensin II (Ang II) is a multifunctional hormone that influences the function of cardiovascular cells through a complex series of intracellular signaling events initiated by the interaction of Ang II with AT1 and AT2 receptors. AT1 receptor activation leads to cell growth, vascular contraction, inflammatory responses and salt and water retention, whereas AT2 receptors induce apoptosis, vasodilation and natriuresis. These effects are mediated via complex, interacting signaling pathways involving stimulation of PLC and Ca2+ mobilization; activation of PLD, PLA2, PKC, MAP kinases and NAD(P)H oxidase, and stimulation of gene transcription. In addition, Ang II activates many intracellular tyrosine kinases that play a role in growth signaling and inflammation, such as Src, Pyk2, p130Cas, FAK and JAK/STAT. These events may be direct or indirect via transactivation of tyrosine kinase receptors, including PDGFR, EGFR and IGFR. Ang II induces a multitude of actions in various tissues, and the signaling events following occupancy and activation of Ang receptors are tightly controlled and extremely complex. Alterations of these highly regulated signaling pathways may be pivotal in structural and functional abnormalities that underlie pathological processes in cardiovascular diseases such as cardiac hypertrophy, hypertension and atherosclerosis.

Renin-angiotensin system antagonism and lipid-lowering therapy in cardiovascular risk management

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and dyslipidaemia have been shown to be involved in the genesis and progression of atherosclerosis. Manipulation of the RAS has been effective in modifying human coronary artery disease progression. Similarly, the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitors or statins have been shown to reduce cholesterol and lower cardiovascular events in primary and secondary prevention trials in coronary artery disease. In addition to their primary mode of action, statins and blockers of the RAS possess common additional properties that include restoration of endothelial activity and inhibition of cellular proliferation. This article reviews the current data on the common properties of these classes of drugs in which the beneficial effects extend beyond their antihypertensive and lipid-lowering properties.

Chronic hypotensive effects of losartan are not dependent on the actions of angiotensin II at AT 2 receptors

We have previously demonstrated the chronic hypotensive effects of the AT1 antagonist, losartan, in normotensive, salt-replete rats. One explanation for this response is a reduction in vascular resistance due to blockade of AT1 receptors. Another explanation is that increases in angiotensin II levels during losartan administration can bind to AT2 receptors. Studies suggest that binding of angiotensin II at AT2 receptors lowers arterial pressure by vasodilation. We hypothesized that the chronic effects of losartan are mediated by activation of angiotensin II effects at AT2 receptors. We tested this hypothesis by infusing the AT2 receptor antagonist, PD123319 (74 mg/kg/day), in conjunction with losartan (10 mg/kg/day) for 10 days in rats and compared the hypotensive response in rats treated with losartan alone. After 6 days of treatment, arterial pressure decreased similarly in losartan (-21 +/- 2 mm Hg) and losartan+PD123319 (-23 +/- 2 mm Hg) treated rats. However, by day 10 of the infusion, arterial pressure had decreased to a greater extent (p < 0.05) in rats treated with losartan and PD123319 (-31 +/- 2 mm Hg) compared with rats treated with losartan alone (-22 +/- 2 mm Hg). We conclude that the hypotensive effects of losartan are not dependent on the actions of angiotensin II at AT 2 receptors in normotensive, salt-replete rats.

Angiotensin receptors: signaling, vascular pathophysiology, and interactions with ceramide

Angiotensin II (ANG II) is a pleiotropic vasoactive peptide that binds to two distinct receptors: the ANG II type 1 (AT(1)) and type 2 (AT(2)) receptors. Activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) results in vascular hypertrophy, vasoconstriction, salt and water retention, and hypertension. These effects are mediated predominantly by AT(1) receptors. Paradoxically, other ANG II-mediated effects, including cell death, vasodilation, and natriuresis, are mediated by AT(2) receptor activation. Our understanding of ANG II signaling mechanisms remains incomplete. AT(1) receptor activation triggers a variety of intracellular systems, including tyrosine kinase-induced protein phosphorylation, production of arachidonic acid metabolites, alteration of reactive oxidant species activities, and fluxes in intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations. AT(2) receptor activation leads to stimulation of bradykinin, nitric oxide production, and prostaglandin metabolism, which are, in large part, opposite to the effects of the AT(1) receptor. The signaling pathways of ANG II receptor activation are a focus of intense investigative effort. We critically appraise the literature on the signaling mechanisms whereby AT(1) and AT(2) receptors elicit their respective actions. We also consider the recently reported interaction between ANG II and ceramide, a lipid second messenger that mediates cytokine receptor activation. Finally, we discuss the potential physiological cross talk that may be operative between the angiotensin receptor subtypes in relation to health and cardiovascular disease. This may be clinically relevant, inasmuch as inhibitors of the RAS are increasingly used in treatment of hypertension and coronary heart disease, where activation of the RAS is recognized.

Angiotensin receptor blockers and the kidney: possible advantages over ACE inhibition?

This review deals with similarities and differences between the effects of ACE inhibitors and AT1-receptor blockers in the kidney. Specific receptor blockade has demonstrated that the beneficial effects of AT1 blockers arise from two mechanisms: the reduction of the AT1 receptor mediated response and the increase in plasma levels of Ang II through the AT1-receptor blockade, which leads to increased stimulation of the AT2 receptor (the so-called yin-yang effect). Both ACE inhibition and AT1-receptor blockade provide significant renal protection in the majority of experimental animal models of kidney diseases. AT1 receptor blockade may offer additional clinical benefits over ACE inhibitor treatment, particularly in the kidney, where AT1-receptor blockade does not cause the fall in glomerular filtration rate seen with ACE inhibitor treatment. A number of long-term clinical studies currently running should show the real value of this new class of compounds in the management of hypertension and associated cardiorenal diseases.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition potentiates angiotensin II type 1 receptor effects on renal bradykinin and cGMP

Angiotensin (Ang) receptor blockers (ARBs) increase bradykinin (BK) by antagonizing Ang II at its type 1 (AT(1)) receptors and diverting Ang II to its counterregulatory type 2 (AT(2)) receptors. Because the effect of ARBs on BK is constrained by the short half-life of BK and because ACE inhibitors block the degradation of BK, this study was designed to test the hypothesis that an ACE inhibitor can potentiate ARB-induced increases in renal interstitial fluid (RIF) BK levels. We used a microdialysis technique to recover BK and cGMP in vivo from the RIF of sodium-depleted, conscious Sprague-Dawley rats infused for 60 minutes with the AT(1) receptor blocker valsartan (0.17 mg/kg per minute), with the active metabolite of the ACE inhibitor benazepril (benazeprilate, 0.05 mg/kg per minute), or with the specific AT(2) receptor blocker PD 123,319 (50 microg/kg per minute) alone or combined. Each animal served as its own control. RIF BK and cGMP levels increased significantly over 1 hour in response to valsartan, benazeprilate, or both but not to a vehicle control (P<0.01). The combined benazeprilate-valsartan effect was greater than the sum of their individual effects, suggesting potentiation rather than addition, and was abolished by PD 123,319. We demonstrate for the first time that an ACE inhibitor (benazepril) and an ARB (valsartan) potentiate each other, and we postulate that such combinations may be beneficial in clinical states marked by Ang II elevation, such as chronic heart failure, postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction, and hypertension.

Difficult cases in heart failure: Raison d'Être behind ACE inhibitors and AT1 receptor combinations in chronic heart failure: chemical nuances or clinical significance?

The following case description serves to illustrate the difficulties often faced in clinical practice in implementing what appear to be fairly simple and clear evidence-based guidelines regarding angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and no clear guidelines regarding angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use or, more importantly, ACE inhibitor and ARB combinations in chronic heart failure. (c)2001 by CHF, Inc.

Angiotensin receptor blockers: evidence for preserving target organs

Hypertension is a major problem throughout the developed world. Although current antihypertensive treatment regimens reduce morbidity and mortality, patients are often noncompliant, and medications may not completely normalize blood pressure. As a result, current therapy frequently does not prevent or reverse the cardiovascular remodeling that often occurs when blood pressure is chronically elevated. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is effective in controlling hypertension and treating congestive heart failure. Both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) inhibit the activity of the RAS, but these two classes of antihypertensive medications have different mechanisms of action and different pharmacologic profiles. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors block a single pathway in the production of angiotensin II (Ang II). In addition, angiotensin I is not the only substrate for ACE. The ACE inhibitors also block the degradation of bradykinin that may have potential benefits in cardiovascular disease. Bradykinin is, however, the presumed cause of cough associated with ACE inhibitor therapy. Data from clinical trials on ACE inhibitors serve to support the involvement of the RAS in the development of cardiovascular disease. Angiotensin receptor blockers act distally in the RAS to block the Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptor selectively. Thus, ARBs are more specific agents and avoid many side effects. Experimental and clinical trials have documented the efficacy of ARBs in preserving target-organ function and reversing cardiovascular remodeling. In some instances, maximal benefit may be obtained with Ang II blockade using both ARBs and ACE inhibitors. This review describes clinical trials that document the efficacy of ARBs in protecting the myocardium, blood vessels, and renal vasculature.

Valsartan and the kidney: review of preclinical and clinical data

In both diabetic and nondiabetic renal disease, reducing blood pressure with antihypertensive therapy has beneficial effects on renal function. The key role of the renin-angiotensin system in blood pressure and volume homeostasis has long been established, but its importance for the overall normal functioning of the kidney itself is also increasingly being recognized. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, widely and successfully used in the treatment of hypertension, may also provide renal protection independent of blood pressure reduction; however, their relatively nonspecific mode of action in blocking an early metabolic step entails major clinical disadvantages, such as accumulation of bradykinin and substance P, that may cause the characteristic ACE-inhibitor side effects of persistent dry cough and, more rarely, angioneurotic edema. Angiotensin II antagonists or receptor blockers, a new class of antihypertensive agent, selectively antagonize the AT1 receptor subtype and, because of greater specificity, do not give rise to the side effects associated with ACE inhibitors. More important, these new drugs may have mechanistic advantages over other antihypertensives, including ACE inhibitors.

Efficacy and safety of angiotensin II receptor blockers in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension

The role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the pathogenesis of hypertensive disease has long been recognized, and the interruption of this cascade with angiotensin-converting enzyme-I has been beneficial in the management of hypertension. Recently, a new class of drugs, the angiotensin receptor blockers, emerged, enlarging the antihypertensive armamentarium. Since elderly patients are more prone to adverse drug reactions, in this paper we review several trials, most of which were of short duration, on the efficacy and safety of angiotensin receptor blockers in the geriatric population with mild to moderate hypertension. These studies established that the drugs are well-tolerated, safe, and in most instances as efficacious as other classes of antihypertensive medications. Combination therapy with angiotensin receptor blockers and hydrochlorothiazide was additive, without any significant effect on the safety profile.

Baseline demographics of the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial. Val-HeFT Investigators

BACKGROUND

The Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) is the first large-scale randomized, multinational clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, added to conventional therapy, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, in heart failure patients. A total of 5010 patients with an ejection fraction <40% have been randomized to either valsartan titrated to 160 mg b.i.d. or to placebo.

AIMS

Baseline characteristics of patients in Val-HeFT are presented and compared with other major clinical trials in heart failure.

METHODS

Baseline data were collected and summary statistics calculated.

RESULTS

The study population has a mean age of 62.7 years and is 80% male, 90.3% white, 6.9% black, and 2.8% Asian. Antecedent coronary heart disease is reported in 57.2% of patients. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are prescribed for 92.7% of patients, diuretics for 85.8%, digoxin for 67.3%, and beta-blockers for 35.6%. Subgroup comparisons by age, sex, race and ejection fraction quartile show small differences in baseline characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Overall the Val-HeFT population is generally representative of the population of patients with mild to moderate heart failure in industrialized countries.

Valsartan in acute myocardial infarction trial (VALIANT): rationale and design

BACKGROUND

Survivors of acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by heart failure and/or resulting in left ventricular dysfunction are at heightened risk for subsequent death and major nonfatal cardiovascular events. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor has consistently been demonstrated to result in reductions in these risks by approximately 20%. The development of angiotensin II receptor blockers offers a new, more specific, and theoretically more complete pharmacologic mode to inhibit the adverse influence of angiotensin II.

METHODS

Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction (VALIANT) is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, active controlled parallel group study comparing the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with valsartan, captopril, and their combination in high-risk patients after MI. The trial is designed with 3 arms, giving equal statistical consideration to survival comparisons of captopril versus the angiotensin II receptor blocker valsartan, as well as the combination of captopril plus valsartan, compared with a proven effective dose of captopril. This 14,500-patient trial is designed with an 86% power to detect a 15% reduction in mortality rate with either use of valsartan compared with captopril. The trial encourages optimal individualization of other proven therapies in acute and chronic infarction, and the international patient body ensures good representation of multiple practice patterns.

CONCLUSION

VALIANT is a large international investigative effort that will evaluate the role of valsartan in the management of patients with MI associated with heart failure and/or left ventricular dysfunction. The use of a proven dose of captopril and the comparator arms with valsartan alone or in combination with captopril provides a unique test of whether the angiotensin II receptor blocker can make an additional improvement in clinical outcomes beyond angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.

Impact of angiotensin II on the kidney: does an angiotensin II receptor blocker make sense?

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) regulates blood pressure, volume, and electrolyte balance. Derangements of the RAS may contribute to hypertension and renal injury, particularly in patients with types 1 or 2 diabetes. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been proven to be beneficial in patients with hypertension and diabetes by preventing or delaying the development and progression of proteinuria and glomerulosclerosis. Comparisons with other drug classes demonstrate renoprotective effects for ACE inhibitors that are independent of-and additive to-their systemic antihypertensive actions. These renal effects may derive from their preferential dilation of renal efferent arterioles, which further reduces intraglomerular pressure. Inhibition of angiotensin II (Ang II) synthesis is subtotal, however, because local non-ACE enzymes also convert Ang I to Ang II. The existence of alternative pathways for Ang II generation that are unaffected by ACE inhibitors raises questions about whether ACE is the optimal target for RAS suppression. Ang II receptor blockers (ARBs), which interrupt the RAS at the target-organ receptor level, will block the effect of angiotensin whether its production involved ACE or a non-ACE pathway. ARBs are currently undergoing clinical trials to assess their efficacy in hypertensive patients with nephropathy.

Rationale for the use of combination angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy in heart failure

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a major role in its pathophysiology, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are the cornerstone of therapy. However, HF continues to progress despite this therapy, perhaps because of production of angiotensin II by alternative pathways, which lead to direct stimulation of the angiotensin II receptor. Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) therapy alone or in combination with the ACE inhibitor is a promising approach to block the RAS and slow HF progression more completely.

METHODS

The current medical literature on the pathophysiology of HF and the use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs was extensively reviewed.

RESULTS

Evidence from basic science, experimental animals, and clinical trials provides data on the safety and efficacy of RAS inhibition with ACE inhibitors and ARBs as monotherapy and in combination. Data from the Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly (ELITE) II trial indicate that ARBs alone do not appear to be more effective than ACE inhibitors in HF, but studies evaluating their use in combination are currently ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of an ARB offers more complete angiotensin II receptor blockade of the RAS than can be obtained by ACE inhibitors alone. Combination therapy preserves the benefits of bradykinin potentiation offered by ACE inhibitors while providing potential antitrophic influences of AT(2) receptor stimulation and may play an increased role in the treatment of chronic HF in the future.

Overview of the management of pediatric heart failure

For the most part of this the century heart failure syndrome was understood as a pump failure disorder with hemodynamic consequences stemming from the same myocardial dysfunction. In addition supply and demand theories were used to explain the nature of symptoms. As a result, therapeutic strategies were directed at correcting the abnormal hemodynamic conditions and normalizing the delivery of the much needed nutrients. Improvement of cardiac pump function with inotropic drugs and abnormal circulatory conditions with afterload and preload modifications became therapeutic goals and standards of care. However, while vasodilators and inotropic drugs immediately improved symptoms, hemodynamics and functional status, in the long term they either did not affect or worsen the natural history of heart failure. In pediatrics, this is further complicated by the lack of large scale trials addressing issues pertinent to the particularities that affect heart failure in children. In the late 1980s and 1990s heart failure has evolved into a more complex, multiple and interactive pathophysiologic disorder. Today not only the abnormal hemodynamics but also the biological disorders are pharmacologic targets. The reversal or slowing of myocardial maladaptation has become one of the most important therapeutic goals. With this end in mind therapeutic strategies may seem counterintuitive and paradoxical, such as the use of beta-blockers. This review will address the current thinking and therapeutic modalities used today in the treatment of heart failure syndrome in the adult population. We also discuss some of the issues why we think that these principles can be extrapolated to the pediatric population.

AT(1) and AT(2) receptors in the kidney: role in disease and treatment

All components of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) are present in the kidneys and constitute a functioning renal RAS. Angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor subtypes AT(1) and AT(2) have been identified in the afferent and efferent arterioles, glomeruli, mesangial cells, and proximal tubules. AT(1) receptors regulate vasoconstriction and sodium and water reabsorption, as well as promote cell growth, proliferation, and collagen matrix deposition. Recent animal studies are elucidating the role of the less well understood AT(2) receptors. The AT(2) receptors appear to counterbalance the AT(1) receptors by increasing the production of bradykinin, nitric oxide, and cyclic guanosine monophosphate-mediating vasodilation and by promoting cell differentiation, antiproliferation, and apoptosis. Ang II subtype 1 receptor blockers prevent Ang II activation of the AT(1) receptor while leaving the AT(2) receptor open to Ang II stimulation.

Rationale for angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with low-renin hypertension

African Americans outrank other ethnic groups in the United States in prevalence, early onset, and severity of hypertension. Furthermore, African Americans suffer the highest rates of mortality from cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and end-stage renal disease. The recently concluded Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study reports that the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril significantly reduced morbidity and mortality in a broad range of patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. These results strengthen the case for increasing the use of ACE inhibitor therapy. In accord with the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) guidelines, antihypertensive monotherapy for African Americans is based on the known ability of diuretics and calcium channel blockers to produce greater reductions in blood pressure in this population than those attainable with beta blockers and ACE inhibitors. The national guidelines also suggest ACE inhibitors for all hypertensive patients with left ventricular dysfunction or nephropathy, which implies that African Americans must cross a clinical threshold to become candidates for these agents. The rationale for delaying ACE inhibitor therapy is due in part to a perceived unique pathobiology in hypertensive African Americans: an excess prevalence of salt sensitivity, hypervolemia, and low plasma renin activity (PRA). At first glance, it would seem intuitive to avoid agents that further depress the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and choose agents that reduce plasma volume. However, most hypertensive African Americans are not hypovolemic. Furthermore, dietary sodium restriction and diuretic therapy raise PRA and improve the response to ACE inhibitors. The overall aim of this article is to explain the rationale for expanded use of drugs that block the RAS in African Americans and low-renin populations.

Gene therapy of hypertensive vascular injury

Hypertension and vascular injury usually require prolonged treatment, and compliance is a key to efficacy for pharmacologically-based antihypertensive therapy. Gene therapy has the potential to be long lasting, with few side effects. Recent studies have provided promising results, in which hypertension can be treated by either augmentation of vasodilation or inhibition of vasoconstriction through gene transfer in experimental models. Gene transfer is also becoming useful for the study of mechanisms of physiologic and pathophysiologic conditions, including hypertension. In this mini-review, we summarize some recent studies in this area of research, and suggest some areas where progress is needed to advance the research toward gene therapy.

Neurohormonal modulation in cardiovascular disease

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is one of the oldest known hormone systems. Its effector hormone, angiotensin (Ang) II, acts through 2 receptor subtypes, AT(1) and AT(2). Most physiologic effects of Ang II, including vasoconstriction, renal salt and water retention, aldosterone and vasopressin release, and sympathetic facilitation, are mediated by AT(1). Recent data, however, suggest that Ang II also contributes to cell proliferation, left ventricular hypertrophy, vascular media hypertrophy, neointima formation in atherosclerosis, and nephrosclerosis by stimulation of AT(1) receptors. AT(2) receptors are associated with antiproliferation, cell differentiation and development, tissue regeneration, and apoptosis. They also antagonize AT(1) receptor-mediated effects, which suggests that the ratio of angiotensin receptors expressed on a particular cell can determine the net effect of Ang II. Selective AT(1) receptor antagonists ("sartans") have been used to treat several million hypertensive patients worldwide. These agents offer a powerful therapeutic alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which reduce the generation of Ang II. Conversely, AT(1) receptor antagonists block the RAS by acting on cellular angiotensin receptors and do not interfere with the breakdown of kinins. These medications inhibit the RAS more completely than do the ACE inhibitors because their action is independent of Ang II-generating pathways. At the same time, early, preliminary data suggest that AT(1) receptor antagonists offer target-organ protection similar to that provided by the ACE inhibitors. Because AT(2) receptors are left unopposed and Ang II levels are increased with AT(1) receptor antagonist treatment, it is important to understand the function of AT(2) to fully appreciate the mechanisms of action of AT(1) receptor antagonists, especially their potential for target-organ protection.

Enhancing cardiac protection after myocardial infarction: rationale for newer clinical trials of angiotensin receptor blockers

Treatment of acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been advanced considerably in the past 20 years with the advent of acute reperfusion strategies such as thrombolytic therapy or primary angioplasty and the use of adjunctive medical therapies such as aspirin, beta-blockers, and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins); each has been proven to reduce morbidity and mortality rates after MI. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have earned an important place in this list of winners, particularly in patients clinically assessed as being at higher risk for cardiovascular death. The benefits of treating such patients with an ACE inhibitor have clearly shown significant improvements in survival that are both complementary and additive to the other proven therapies. However, a significant subset of patients treated with ACE inhibitors will die or have worsening congestive heart failure despite adequate therapy. Appropriate risk stratification can help guide the clinician in identifying patients at greatest risk for cardiovascular events after MI. Fortunately, investigators are currently exploring the potential benefits of more specific and selective blockade of the renin-angiotensin system with AT(1) receptor blockers (ARBs) in the hope of enhancing survival beyond that evidenced with ACE inhibition alone. These agents pharmacologically inhibit the renin-angiotensin system at the angiotensin (Ang) II type 1 receptor level. Although there are theories postulating why blocking the harmful effects of Ang II at this receptor would be more effective than inhibiting ACE-mediated conversion from inactive Ang I to Ang II, extrapolation to the clinical setting remains highly speculative. These hypotheses can only be tested by direct comparisons of ACE inhibitors and ARBs in the appropriate patient populations. The VALIANT (Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial is testing the hypothesis that interruption of the renin-angiotensin pathway by using the ARB valsartan alone or in combination with an ACE inhibitor will be more effective in saving lives than an ACE inhibitor alone in treating patients at high risk. This trial will enroll patients with symptoms of congestive heart failure or depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and randomly assign them to either captopril, valsartan, or the combination. Other proven conventional post-MI therapies are encouraged. This study will definitively determine whether the use of valsartan offers additional benefits over those achieved with ACE inhibitor monotherapy in patients at high risk after MI.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers: review of the binding characteristics

Several angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), including candesartan cilexetil, irbesartan, losartan, telmisartan, and valsartan, are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with hypertension. These agents share a common mechanism of action-antagonism of the angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor-and as a result, they block a number of angiotensin II effects that are relevant to the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease, including vasoconstriction, renal sodium reabsorption, aldosterone and vasopressin secretion, sympathetic activation, and vascular and cardiac hyperplasia and hypertrophy. Unlike the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, these new drugs block the effects of angiotensin II regardless of whether it is produced systemically in the circulation or locally via ACE- or non-ACE-dependent pathways in tissues. ARBs also block the angiotensin II-induced feedback regulation of renin release, resulting in an increase in angiotensin II levels. With the AT1 receptor blocked, angiotensin II is available to activate the angiotensin type 2 (AT2) receptor, which mediates several potentially beneficial effects in the cardiovascular system, including vasodilation, antiproliferation, and apoptosis. Thus, ARBs provide a highly selective approach for regulating the effects of angiotensin II.

AT(2) receptor stimulation enhances antihypertensive effect of AT(1) receptor antagonist in hypertensive rats

In the present study, we investigated the role of the angiotensin type 2 (AT(2)) receptor in the regulation of blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY). We tested the hypothesis that AT(2) receptor activation may contribute to the antihypertensive effects of angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate were measured over a 4-day protocol in various groups of rats that received the following drug combinations: the AT(1) receptor antagonist candesartan (0.01 or 0.1 mg/kg IV) alone, the AT(2) receptor agonist CGP42112 (1 microg/kg per minute) alone, and candesartan plus CGP42112. In both SHR and WKY, 4-hour infusions of saline and CGP42112 alone did not alter MAP. In WKY, both doses of candesartan alone caused small decreases in MAP, which were similar when combined with CGP42112. In SHR, candesartan (0.1 mg/kg) caused an immediate, marked decrease in MAP, which was unaffected when combined with CGP42112. By contrast, in separate SHR, a 10-fold lower dose of candesartan (0.01 mg/kg) caused a slower-onset depressor response, which was enhanced when combined with CGP42112. The involvement of AT(2) receptors was confirmed in another group of SHR, since this facilitation of the antihypertensive effect of candesartan by CGP42112 was abolished by the coinfusion of the AT(2) receptor antagonist PD123319 (50 microg/kg per minute) with the candesartan/CGP42112 combination. Collectively, these data suggest that in SHR, AT(2) receptor activation can facilitate the initial depressor response caused by an AT(1) receptor antagonist.

Sustained inhibition of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) expression and long-term antihypertensive action by virally mediated delivery of ACE antisense cDNA

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been proven to be highly effective and are for the most part the drugs of choice in the treatment and control of hypertension, congestive heart failure, and left ventricular dysfunction. Despite this, questions regarding side effects and compliance with this traditional pharmacological strategy remain. In view of these observations, coupled with recent advances in gene-transfer technology, our objective in this study was to determine whether the expression of ACE could be controlled on a permanent basis at a genetic level. We argued that the introduction of ACE antisense to inhibit the enzyme would be a prerequisite in considering the antisense gene therapy for the control of hypertension and other related pathological states. Retroviral vectors (LNSV) containing ACE sense (LNSV-ACE-S) and ACE antisense (LNSV-ACE-AS) sequences were constructed and were used in rat pulmonary artery endothelial cells (RPAECs) to determine the feasibility of this approach. Infection of rat RPAECs with LNSV-ACE-S and LNSV-ACE-AS resulted in a robust expression of transcripts corresponding to ACE-S and ACE-AS, respectively, for the duration of these experiments, ie, 8 consecutive passages. The expression of ACE-AS but not of ACE-S was associated with a permanent decrease of approximately 70% to 75% in ACE expression and a 50% increase in the B(max) for the AT(1)s. Although angiotensin II caused a concentration-dependent stimulation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels in both ACE-S- and ACE-AS-expressing cells, the stimulation was significantly higher in ACE-AS-expressing RPAECs. In vivo experiments demonstrated a prolonged expression of ACE-AS transcripts in cardiovascularly relevant tissues of rats. This was associated with a long-term reduction in blood pressure by approximately 15 mm Hg, exclusively in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. These observations demonstrate that delivery of ACE-AS by retroviral vector results in a permanent inhibition of ACE and a long-term reduction in high blood pressure in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.

Practical considerations of the pharmacology of angiotensin receptor blockers

A review of the drug class of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) as well as the ARBs currently available by prescription in the United States is presented. The importance of angiotensin II production by non-angiotensin-converting enzyme (non-ACE) pathways, particularly human chymase, is discussed. Emphasis is placed on the mechanism of action of ARBs and the different binding kinetics of these agents. Although all ARBs, as a group, block the AT1 receptor, they may differ in the pharmacological characteristics of their binding and be classified as either surmountable or insurmountable antagonists. Mechanisms of surmountable and insurmountable antagonism as well as possible benefits of these blocking characteristics are discussed in relation to the various ARBs. The cardiovascular effects of activation of the two main subtypes of angiotensin receptors (AT1 and AT2) are presented. In addition to their treatment of hypertension, ACE inhibitors are recognized as being effective in the management of heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy, recurrent myocardial infarctions, and renal disease. ARBs are currently indicated only for the treatment of hypertension; however, in vitro and in vivo pharmacological studies as well as preliminary clinical data suggest that ARBs, like ACE inhibitors, may also provide effective protection against end-organ damage in these conditions.