Standardization of flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) for investigation of unexplained habitual abortion

Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as screening method for anti-paternal allo-antibodies in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)

OBJECTIVES

Non-HLA-specific anti-paternal antibodies (APA) have been associated with immune responses against HLA-negative trophoblast. As screening for APA by using the flow cytometric cross match (FCXM) is complicated, we evaluated the One Lambda Antigen Tray Test (OLATT) an easy screening method for antibodies in organ transplant recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

We randomly selected 92 patients of our recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)-clinic merely on the basis of having had at least two consecutive miscarriages at <20 weeks representing positive and negative FCXM results. Stored sera were thawed and tested by OLATT. Concordance (Kappa statistic) and conformance (Chi-square test to McNemar) of FCXM and OLATT results were analysed.

RESULTS

Of 48 FCXM-positive patients, 38 (79.2%) were positive and 10 (20.8%) negative by OLATT. Out of 44 FCXM negative patients, 37 (84.1%) were negative and 7 (15.9%) positive by OLATT. This resulted in a positive prediction value of 84.4%, a negative prediction value of 78.7% and a highly significant concordance (kappa=0.631 (p<0.0001; 81.5% versus 50%)) and conformance (p=0.23) between FCXM and OLATT in RPL patients.

CONCLUSION

Using the OLATT could substitute the FCXM in screening RPL patients for APA and this might help to more closely study the role of APA in human gestation.

Biomarkers in transplantation: Prospective, blinded measurement of predictive value for the flow cytometry crossmatch after negative antiglobulin crossmatch in kidney transplantation

This prospective, blinded observational study was conducted to measure the predictive value the of flow cytometric crossmatch for biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death following kidney transplantation. Patients were selected for renal transplantation on the basis of a conventional antihuman globulin cytotoxic T-cell crossmatch. Flow crossmatch was performed simultaneously, but the results were not disclosed to the transplant team. A total of 257 kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in the study; 78 patients experienced biopsy-proven rejection in the first post-transplant year, and 41 patients lost their graft or died during the period of follow-up (mean: 2046 days). Kaplan-Meier estimates of rejection, graft loss, or patient death did not differ between subjects with a positive or negative flow crossmatch. Cox analyses showed no influence of the flow crossmatch on the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection (P = 0.987). The sensitivity and specificity of the flow crossmatch for prediction of biopsy-proven rejection were 0.128 and 0.883, and the positive and negative post-test probabilities were 0.323 and 0.301, respectively. The magnitude of the channel shift did not influence the multivariate Cox regression model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the flow crossmatch was 0.483 (P = 0.71) and 0.572 (P = 0.38), respectively for the living and cadaver transplant recipients, indicating no discriminative value in this study population. Flow crossmatch appears to have no significant incremental value in predicting biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death following kidney transplantation in patients who have a negative antihuman globulin cytotoxic T-cell crossmatch against their donor.

Value of flow cytometric assay for the detection of antisperm antibodies in women with a history of recurrent abortion

PROBLEM

To verify the proposed relationship between recurrent spontaneous abortions and the presence of maternal antisperm antibodies (ASA) in women as detected by a sensitive and reliable method.

METHOD OF STUDY

The presence of maternal antipaternal immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies were determined against three different paternal antigens comprising T, B lymphocytes and semen cells by a sensitive flow cytometric crossmatch method to examine their possible correlation with pregnancy outcome. Group 1 consisted of sera obtained from 24 women with a history of abortion, and lymphocytes and semen samples collected from their husbands at the same time of visiting the in vitro fertilization (IVF) Clinic at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center. Sera, lymphocytes and semen samples were also collected from six couples with no history of abortion who served as controls (Group 2).

RESULTS

Using a sensitive flow cytometric assay to analyse the samples, without knowledge of clinical status, elevated levels of both IgG and IgM were detected in Group 1. However, no significant association was found when compared with normal females who had healthy pregnancies.

CONCLUSION

Flow cytometry is a highly sensitive and specific tool for the detection of alloantibodies in human sera from patients with rejected transplanted organs. Our findings suggest that maternal antipaternal antibodies with respect to IgG and IgM classes do not play a major role in women with a history of recurrent abortions, despite the presence of increased levels of antibodies against three different sources of paternal antigens.