A comparison of long-term survivals of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant between African American and Caucasian recipients with basiliximab induction therapy

Impact of early corticosteroid withdrawal on simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant long-term outcomes: Single center experience and comparison to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry

BACKGROUND

There remains a paucity of modern data comparing early steroid withdrawal (ESW) versus chronic corticosteroid (CCS) immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplant recipients with long-term follow-up. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of ESW compared to CCS post-SPK.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center matched comparison with the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR). Patients from University of Illinois Hospital (UIH) represented the ESW group and were compared to those matched CCS patients from the IPTR. Included patients were adult recipients of a primary SPK transplant between 2003 and 2018 within the US receiving rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction. Patients were excluded if they had early technical failures, missing IPTR data, graft thrombosis, re-transplant, or positive crossmatch SPK.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were matched and included in the analysis. Patients were predominantly African American (46.15%) males (64.1%) with Type 1 diabetes etiology (92.31%). Overall pancreas allograft survival (hazard ratio [HR] = .89, 95% confidence interval [CI] .34-2.30, p = .81) and kidney allograft survival (HR = .80, 95%CI .32-2.03, p = .64) were similar between the two groups. Immunologic pancreas allograft loss was statistically similar at 1-year (ESW 1.3% vs. CCS 0%, p = .16), 5-year (ESW 1.3% vs. CCS 7.7%, p = .16), and 10-year (ESW 11.0% vs. CCS 7.7%, p = .99). The 1-year (ESW 2.6% vs. CCS 0%, p > .05), 5-year (ESW 8.3% vs. CCS 7.0%, p > .05), and 10-year (ESW 22.7% vs. CCS 9.9%, p = .2575) immunologic kidney allograft loss were also statistically similar. There was no difference in 10-year overall patient survival (ESW 76.2% vs. CCS 65.6%, p = .63).

CONCLUSIONS

No differences were found between allograft or patient survival post-SPK when comparing an ESW or CCS protocol. Future assessment is needed to determine differences in metabolic outcomes.

Pancreas Transplantation in Minorities including Patients with a Type 2 Diabetes Phenotype

Background: Prior to year 2000, the majority of pancreas transplants (PTx) were performed as simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPKTs) in Caucasian adults with end stage renal failure secondary to type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) who were middle-aged. In the new millennium, improving outcomes have led to expanded recipient selection that includes patients with a type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) phenotype, which excessively affects minority populations. Methods: Using PubMed® to identify appropriate citations, we performed a literature review of PTx in minorities and in patients with a T2DM phenotype. Results: Mid-term outcomes with SPKT in patients with uremia and circulating C-peptide levels (T2DMphenotype) are comparable to those patients with T1DM although there may exist a selection bias in the former group. Excellent outcomes with SPKT suggests that the pathophysiology of T2DM is heterogeneous with elements consisting of both insulin deficiency and resistance related to beta-cell failure. As a result, increasing endogenous insulin (Cp) production following PTx may lead to freedom checking blood sugars or taking insulin, better metabolic counter-regulation, and improvements in quality of life and life expectancy compared to other available treatment options. Experience with solitary PTx for T2DM or in minorities is limited but largely mirrors the trends reported in SPKT. Conclusions: PTx is a viable treatment option in patients with pancreas endocrine failure who are selected appropriately regardless of diabetes type or recipient race. This review will summarize data that unconventional patient populations with insulin-requiring diabetes may gain value from PTx with an emphasis on contemporary experiences and appropriate selection in minorities in the new millennium.

Simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplantation in Caucasian versus African American patients: Does recipient race influence outcomes?

The influence of African American (AA) recipient race on outcomes following simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplantation (SPKT) is uncertain.

Immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation with an emphasis on antibody induction strategies: review and perspective

A review of recent literature was performed to identify trends and evaluate outcomes with respect to immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation (PTX). In the past decade, the majority of PTXs were performed with depleting antibody induction, particularly in the setting of either calcineurin inhibitor minimization, corticosteroid withdrawal or both. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of predominantly tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolatemofetil, TAC/mycophenolic acid or TAC/sirolimus with or without corticosteroids. Depending on PTX category, donor and recipient risk factors, case mix and immunosuppressive regimen, the 1-year incidence of acute rejection has decreased to 5-20%. Current 1-year rates of immunological pancreas graft loss range between 1.8 and 6%. Depleting antibody induction and either TAC/mycophenolatemofetil or TAC/sirolimus maintenance therapy with early steroid withdrawal have become the mainstay of immunosuppression in PTX. However, the development of non-nephrotoxic, nondiabetogenic, and nongastrointestinal toxic regimens is highly desirable to improve quality of life in all solid organ transplant recipients.

Monoclonal antibody therapy and renal transplantation: focus on adverse effects

A series of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are commonly utilized in renal transplantation as induction therapy (a period of intense immunosuppression immediately before and following the implant of the allograft), to treat steroid-resistant acute rejections, to decrease the incidence and mitigate effects of delayed graft function, and to allow immunosuppressive minimization. Additionally, in the last few years, their use has been proposed for the treatment of chronic antibody-mediated rejection, a major cause of late renal allograft loss. Although the exact mechanism of immunosuppression and allograft tolerance with any of the currently used induction agents is not completely defined, the majority of these medications are targeted against specific CD proteins on the T or B cells surface (e.g., CD3, CD25, CD52). Moreover, some of them have different mechanisms of action. In particular, eculizumab, interrupting the complement pathway, is a new promising treatment tool for acute graft complications and for post-transplant hemolytic uremic syndrome. While it is clear their utility in renal transplantation, it is also unquestionable that by using these highly potent immunosuppressive agents, the body loses much of its innate ability to mount an adequate immune response, thereby increasing the risk of severe adverse effects (e.g., infections, malignancies, haematological complications). Therefore, it is extremely important for clinicians involved in renal transplantation to know the potential side effects of monoclonal antibodies in order to plan a correct therapeutic strategy minimizing/avoiding the onset and development of severe clinical complications.

Trends in immunosuppression after pancreas transplantation: what is in the pipeline? Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2013;18:76-82. [PMID: 23254700 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e32835c6eda]

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of currently available immunosuppressive strategies and novel therapeutic developments in pancreas transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

From 1966 through 2012 more than 30 000 pancreas transplantations have been performed around the world with excellent patient and graft survival. However, drug-related side effects and toxicities remain to negatively affect long-term outcomes. At present, more than 90% of pancreas transplant recipients receive induction therapy with depleting or nondepleting antibodies. The most widely used maintenance protocols are based on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with early or delayed corticosteroid withdrawal. In case of documented side effects related to this standard protocol, several regimens are actively pursued to switch to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors as well as to attempt initial calcineurin inhibitor avoidance and immunosuppression minimization. In addition, the recent documented negative impact of donor-specific antibodies on pancreas transplantation outcome has resulted in new treatment protocols for antibody-mediated rejection including intravenous immunoglobulins, anti-CD20 antibodies and protease inhibitors.

SUMMARY

Implementation of novel therapeutic strategies and combination protocols to reduce or avoid drug toxicities and immune-related complications that are evaluated in prospective and randomized trials is requested to improve outcomes after pancreas transplantation.

Antibody induction therapy in adult kidney transplantation: A controversy continues

Antibody induction therapy is frequently used as an adjunct to the maintenance immunosuppression in adult kidney transplant recipients. Published data support antibody induction in patients with immunologic risk to reduce the incidence of acute rejection (AR) and graft loss from rejection. However, the choice of antibody remains controversial as the clinical studies were carried out on patients of different immunologic risk and in the context of varying maintenance regimens. Antibody selection should be guided by a comprehensive assessment of immunologic risk, patient comorbidities, financial burden as well as the maintenance immunosuppressives. Lymphocyte-depleting antibody (thymoglobulin, ATGAM or alemtuzumab) is usually recommended for those with high risk of rejection, although it increases the risk of infection and malignancy. For low risk patients, interleukin-2 receptor antibody (basiliximab or daclizumab) reduces the incidence of AR without much adverse effects, making its balance favorable in most patients. It should also be used in the high risk patients with other medical comorbidities that preclude usage of lymphocyte-depleting antibody safely. There are many patients with very low risk, who may be induced with intravenous steroids without any antibody, as long as combined potent immunosuppressives are kept as maintenance. In these patients, benefits with antibody induction may be too small to outweigh its adverse effects and financial cost. Rituximab can be used in desensitization protocols for ABO and/or HLA incompatible transplants. There are emerging data suggesting that alemtuzumab induction be more successful than other antibody for promoting less intensive maintenance protocols, such as steroid withdrawal, tacrolimus monotherapy or lower doses of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. However, the long-term efficacy and safety of these unconventional strategies remains unknown.

Long-term outcome of highly sensitized African American patients transplanted with deceased donor kidneys

Undertaking transplantation in highly sensitized African American (AA) patients as transplant recipients represents a unique challenge. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of AA with non-African American (NAA) patients who had panel reactive antibody >80% and received deceased donor (DD) kidneys by virtual crossmatch. Immunosuppressive regimen included basiliximab induction and tacrolimus, mycophenolate acid and steroids maintenance. Among 835 consecutive transplants from 1998 to 2007, 142 (17%) were sensitized patients including 89 (16.6%) AA and 53 (17.7%) NAA patients. The AA group had similar 5-year incidence of acute rejection as NAA group (21.4% vs. 26.4%, P = 0.25). Kaplan-Meier estimated graft survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were 91%, 85% and 82% in AA group, and 94%, 79% and 71% in NAA group (P = 0.08). The death-censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years were 93%, 86% and 84% in AA group, and 96%, 83% and 78% in NAA group (P = 0.11). The 1, 3, and 5 years patient survivals were 93%, 88% and 85% in AA group, and 96%, 96% and 94% in NAA group (P = 0.17). Highly sensitized AA patients could be transplanted with DD kidneys at a similar rate as NAA patients, and they may not have a higher incidence of rejection or an inferior graft survival than NAA patients.

Influence of recipient race on the outcome of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

Racial differences on the outcome of simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplantation have not been well studied. We compared mortality and graft survival of African Americans (AA) recipients to other racial/ethnic groups (non-AA) using the national data. We studied a total of 6585 adult SPK transplants performed in the United States between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2007. We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine risk factors associated with early graft failure and immune-mediated late graft loss. We used conditional Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariate Cox regression analyses to estimate late death-censored kidney and pancreas graft failure and death between the groups. Although there was no racial disparity in the first 90 days, AA patients had 38% and 47% higher risk for late death-censored kidney and pancreas graft failure, respectively (p = 0.006 and 0.001). AA patients were twice more likely to lose the kidney and pancreas graft due to rejection (OR 2.31 and 1.86, p = 0.002 and 0.008, respectively). Bladder pancreas drainage was associated with inferior patient survival (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.15, 1.75, p = 0.001). In the era of modern immunosuppression, AA SPK transplant patients continue to have inferior graft outcome. Additional studies to explore the mechanisms of such racial disparity are warranted.

Advances in immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A review of current literature was performed to identify trends and evaluate outcomes with regard to clinical immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Through 2006, over 20 000 pancreas transplantations were performed in the US. Since 2000, the 1-year patient survival rates for the three pancreas transplantation categories--simultaneous pancreas-kidney, sequential pancreas after kidney, and pancreas alone--were 95-97% and the 1-year pancreas graft survival (complete insulin independence) rates were 85%, 78%, and 77%, respectively. One-year rates of rejection have steadily decreased and are currently in the 10-20% range depending on case mix and immunosuppressive regimen. At present, 88% of recipients receive antibody induction, 65% receive maintenance therapy with the tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil combination, and 40-50% undergo corticosteroid withdrawal without adverse consequences. Limited data with tacrolimus/sirolimus reveal excellent short-term outcomes, whereas initial attempts with calcineurin inhibitor avoidance or minimization are less promising.

SUMMARY

Antibody induction and either tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus/sirolimus maintenance therapy with steroid withdrawal have become the mainstay of contemporary immunosuppression in clinical pancreas transplantation. The development of a nonnephrotoxic, nondiabetogenic, and nongastrointestinal toxic regimen, however, is highly desirable to improve outcomes and quality of life in recipients.

A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing histidine-tryptophane-ketoglutarate versus University of Wisconsin perfusion solution in clinical pancreas transplantation

We aimed to evaluate early pancreas transplant graft function after histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) versus University of Wisconsin (UW) perfusion. Prospective randomized multicenter study including 68 pancreas transplantations stratified according to preservation fluid used (27 HTK vs. 41 UW). Primary endpoint was pancreas graft survival at 6 months. Serum alpha-amylase, lipase, C-peptide, HbA1C and exogenous insulin requirement were compared at several time points. Mean pancreas cold ischemia time was 10.8 +/- 3.7 (HTK) vs. 11.8 +/- 3.4 h (UW) (P = 0.247). Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation was performed in 95.6% of the patients, pancreas transplantation alone in 2.9%, and pancreas after kidney transplantation in 1.5%. Six months graft survival was 85.2% (HTK) vs. 90.2% (UW) (P = 0.703). Serum amylase and lipase values did not differ between both the groups during the observation period. C-peptide levels were elevated in both the groups without significant differences at each time point. Higher exogenous insulin requirement early after transplantation in the UW group had resolved at 3 months. Six month patient survival was 96.3% (HTK) vs. 100% (UW) (P = 0.397). With a mean cold ischemia time of 10 h in this study, HTK and UW solutions appear to be equally suitable for perfusion and organ preservation in clinical pancreas transplantation.