Alemtuzumab induction prior to cardiac transplantation with lower intensity maintenance immunosuppression: one-year outcomes

Novel Immunosuppression in Solid Organ Transplantation

Solid organ transplantation and survival has improved tremendously in the last few decades, much of the success has been attributed to the advancements in immunosuppression. While steroids are being replaced and much of the immunosuppressive strategies focus on steroid free regimens, novel agents have introduced in the induction, maintenance, and treatment of acute rejection phase. MTOR inhibitors have helped with the renal sparing side effect from the calcineurin inhibitors, newer agents such as rituximab have decreased the incidence of donor-specific antibodies which led to decreased incidence of acute rejection reactions. In this chapter we discuss the newer therapies directed specifically for solid organ transplantation.

Induction Therapy and Therapeutic Antibodies

Prevention of allograft rejection is one of the crucial goals in solid organ transplantation to ensure durability of the graft and is chiefly mediated by cellular and humoral pathways targeting cell surface alloantigens. The risk of rejection is highest in the first post-transplant year and wanes with time albeit the risk always exists and varies with the type of organ transplanted. Induction therapies refer to the use of high-intensity immunosuppression in the immediate post-operative period to mitigate the highest risk of rejection. This term encompasses chiefly the use of antibody therapies directed against one of the key pathways in T-cell activation or abrogating effects of circulating alloantibodies. These antibodies carry more potent immunomodulatory effect than maintenance immunosuppressive therapy alone and many of them lead to durable immune cell depletion. A variety of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies have been utilized for use not only for induction therapy, but also for treatment of allograft rejection when it occurs and as components of desensitization therapy before and after transplantation to modulate circulating alloantibodies.

Microbiota, renal disease and renal transplantation

Aim of this frontier review has been to highlight the role of microbiota in healthy subjects and in patients affected by renal diseases with particular reference to renal transplantation. The microbiota has a relevant role in conditioning the healthy status and the diseases. In particular gut microbiota is essential in the metabolism of food and has a relevant role for its relationship with the immune system. The indigenous microbiota in patients with chronic renal failure is completely different than that of the healthy subjects and pathobionts appear. This abnormality in microbiota composition is called dysbiosis and may cause a rapid deterioration of the renal function both for activating the immune system and producing large quantity of uremic toxins. Similarly, after renal trans-plantation the microbiota changes with the appearance of pathobionts, principally in the first period because of the assumption of immunosuppressive drugs and antibiotics. These changes may deeply interfere with the graft outcome causing acute rejection, renal infections, diarrhea, and renal interstitial fibrosis. In addition, change in the microbiota may modify the metabolism of immuno-suppressive drugs causing in some patients the need of modifying the immunosuppressant dosing. The restoration of the indigenous microbiota after transplantation is important, either to avoiding the complications that impair the normal renal graft, and because recent studies have documented the role of an indigenous microbiota in inducing tolerance towards the graft. The use of prebiotics, probiotics, smart bacteria and diet modification may restore the indigenous microbiota, but these studies are just at their beginning and more data are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Clinical Outcomes of Perioperative Desensitization in Heart Transplant Recipients

Background.

Sensitization remains a barrier to heart transplantation (HT). Perioperative desensitization strategies have been described; however, a paucity of evidence exists to demonstrate efficacy and safety in HT.

Methods.

This single-center, retrospective study consisted of adults who received an HT. Perioperative desensitization was initiated if virtual crossmatch or flow-cytometry crossmatch was positive. Therapy consisted of plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin. Historical controls received standard immunosuppression or induction. The primary endpoint was survival at 12 mo. Secondary endpoints included freedom from acute rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and infectious complications.

Results.

Of the 104 patients included, 48 received no induction, 46 received induction, and 10 underwent perioperative desensitization. No differences were observed in the primary endpoint at 12 mo (90.0% versus 97.9%, P = 0.25 for desensitization versus no-induction; 90.0% versus 100%, P = 0.72 for desensitization versus induction). Rates of acute rejection were lower with induction and desensitization compared with no-induction. There were no significant differences in CAV between the groups. Infectious complications were also similar among the groups (10.0% versus 16.7%, P = 0.62 for desensitization versus no-induction; 10.0% versus 30.4%, P = 0.34 for desensitization versus induction).

Conclusions.

This study suggests that a perioperative desensitization strategy triggered by positive virtual crossmatch or flow-cytometry crossmatch allows for successful transplantation of sensitized HT recipients and results in acceptable rates of survival, rejection, CAV, and infection at 12 mo.

Infectious Complications of Biological and Small Molecule Targeted Immunomodulatory Therapies

The past 2 decades have seen a revolution in our approach to therapeutic immunosuppression. We have moved from relying on broadly active traditional medications, such as prednisolone or methotrexate, toward more specific agents that often target a single receptor, cytokine, or cell type, using monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, or targeted small molecules. This change has transformed the treatment of many conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, cancers, asthma, and inflammatory bowel disease, but along with the benefits have come risks. Contrary to the hope that these more specific agents would have minimal and predictable infectious sequelae, infectious complications have emerged as a major stumbling block for many of these agents. Furthermore, the growing number and complexity of available biologic agents makes it difficult for clinicians to maintain current knowledge, and most review articles focus on a particular target disease or class of agent. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about infectious complications of biologic and small molecule immunomodulatory agents, aiming to create a single resource relevant to a broad range of clinicians and researchers. For each of 19 classes of agent, we discuss the mechanism of action, the risk and types of infectious complications, and recommendations for prevention of infection.

Alemtuzumab Induction Versus Conventional Immunosuppression in Heart Transplant Recipients

The use of alemtuzumab for induction therapy in orthotopic heart transplantation remains controversial, despite its observed benefits in other transplant populations. This study aimed to evaluate whether alemtuzumab conferred a lower risk of rejection while reducing toxicities commonly attributed to standard immunosuppression in orthotopic heart transplantation. We included adult patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation and received induction therapy with alemtuzumab (n = 26) or standard immunosuppression (n = 26). The primary end point was freedom from grade ≥2 rejection at 12 months. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups with the exception of poorer renal function in the alemtuzumab group (P < .05). The primary end point of freedom from grade ≥2 rejection at 12 months was not different between alemtuzumab and standard therapy (76.9% vs 96.2%, P = .077), likely due to similarities in the rates of antibody-mediated rejection in the 2 groups. However, grade ≥2 acute cellular rejection was considerably lower with alemtuzumab (0% vs 19.2%, P = .02), as was acute cellular rejection of any severity (50% vs 7.7%, P = .004). Deterioration in renal function was significantly greater among patients receiving standard therapy as evidenced by decreases in glomerular filtration rate (-25.6 vs -9.2 mL/min, P = .032). No differences in hematologic or infectious complications were observed. In conclusion, alemtuzumab reduced several important rejection-related outcomes while ameliorating the toxicities associated with standard immunosuppression therapy, making it a promising agent for induction in orthotopic heart transplantation.

Impact of Human Mutant TGFβ1/Fc Protein on Memory and Regulatory T Cell Homeostasis Following Lymphodepletion in Nonhuman Primates

Transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) plays a key role in T cell homeostasis and peripheral tolerance. We evaluated the influence of a novel human mutant TGFβ1/Fc (human IgG4 Fc) fusion protein on memory CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell (Tmem) responses in vitro and their recovery following antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-mediated lymphodepletion in monkeys. TGFβ1/Fc induced Smad2/3 protein phosphorylation in rhesus and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells and augmented the suppressive effect of rapamycin on rhesus Tmem proliferation after either alloactivation or anti-CD3/CD28 stimulation. In combination with IL-2, the incidence of CD4⁺ CD25^hi Foxp3^hi regulatory T cells (Treg) and Treg:Th17 ratios were increased. In lymphodepleted monkeys, whole blood trough levels of infused TGFβ1/Fc were maintained between 2 and 7 μg/mL for 35 days. Following ATG administration, total T cell numbers were reduced markedly. In those given TGFβ1/Fc infusion, CD8⁺ T cell recovery to predepletion levels was delayed compared to controls. Additionally, numbers of CD4⁺ CD25^hi CD127^lo Treg increased at 4-6 weeks after depletion but subsequently declined to predepletion levels by 12 weeks. In all monkeys, CD4⁺ CD25^hi Foxp3^hi Treg/CD4⁺ IL-17⁺ cell ratios were reduced, particularly after stopping TGFβ1/Fc infusion. Thus, human TGFβ1/Fc infusion may delay Tmem recovery following lymphodepletion in nonhuman primates. Combined (low-dose) IL-2 infusion may be required to improve the Treg:Th17 ratio following lymphodepletion.

Impact of induction immunosuppression on survival in heart transplant recipients: a contemporary analysis of agents

INTRODUCTION

The impact of induction immunosuppression on long-term survival in heart transplant recipients is unclear. Over the past three decades, practices have varied as induction agents have changed and experiences grew. We sought to evaluate the effect of contemporary induction immunosuppression agents in heart transplant recipients with the primary endpoint of survival, utilizing national registry data.

METHODS

We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data registry for all heart transplants from 1987 to 2012. We restricted our analysis to adult (≥18 yr) recipients performed from 2001-2011 (to allow for the potential for a minimum of 12 months post-transplant follow-up) who received either: no antibody based induction (NONE) or the contemporary agents (INDUCED) of either: basiliximab/daclizumab (IL-2Rab), alemtuzumab, or ATG/ALG/thymoglobulin. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the survival function as well as Cox proportional hazards models were utilized.

RESULTS

Of the 17 857 heart transplants that met the inclusion criteria, there were 4635 (26%) reported deaths during the follow-up period. There were 8216 (46%) patients who were INDUCED. Of the INDUCED agents, 55% were IL-2Rab, 4% alemtuzumab, and 40% ALG/ATG/thymoglobulin. Donor and recipient characteristics were evaluated. Overall, being INDUCED did not significantly affect survival in univariable (p = 0.522) and multivariable (p = 0.130) Cox models as well as a propensity score adjusted model (p = 0.733). Among those induced, ATG/ALG/thymoglobulin appeared to have superior survival as compared with IL-2Rab (log-rank p = 0.007, univariable hazard ratio [HR] = 0.886; 95% CI: 0.811-0.968; p = 0.522). However, in a multivariable Cox model that adjusted for recipient age, VAD, BMI, steroid use, CMV match, and ischemic time, the hazard ratio for ALG/ATG/thymoglobulin vs. IL-2Rab was no longer statistically significant (HR = 0.948; 95% CI: 0.850-1.058; p = 0.341).

CONCLUSION

In a contemporary analysis of heart transplant recipients, an overall analysis of induction agents does not appear to impact survival, as compared to no induction immunosuppression. While ALG/ATG/thymoglobulin appeared to have a beneficial effect on survival compared to IL-2Rab in the univariable model, this difference was no longer statistically significant once we adjusted for clinically relevant covariates.

Immunosuppression following heart transplantation: prospects and challenges

Immunosuppression after heart transplantation has significantly reduced the incidence of cellular rejection and improved patient outcomes with the routine use of calcineurin inhibitors. Antimetabolites and proliferation signal inhibitors add to the improvement in patient outcomes, particularly with respect to the reduced burden of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Patients with antibody sensitization are potentially at higher risk of postoperative complications. Sensitized patients are undergoing heart transplantation with increased frequency, in part due to the emergence of ventricular assist device use as a bridge to heart transplantation. Despite improvements in immunosuppressive therapies, many challenges face physicians and patients, which will further refine and improve care of the post-heart transplant patient.

Immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Heart transplantation has become a valuable and well-accepted treatment option for end-stage heart failure. Rejection of the transplanted heart by the recipient's body is a risk to the success of the procedure, and life-long immunosuppression is necessary to avoid this. Clear evidence is required to identify the best, safest and most effective immunosuppressive treatment strategy for heart transplant recipients. To date, there is no consensus on the use of immunosuppressive antibodies against T-cells for induction after heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

To review the benefits, harms, feasibility and tolerability of immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction versus placebo, or no antibody induction, or another kind of antibody induction for heart transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid) (1946 to November Week 1 2012), EMBASE (Ovid) (1946 to 2012 Week 45), ISI Web of Science (14 November 2012); we also searched two clinical trial registers and checked reference lists in November 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) assessing immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients. Within individual trials, we required all participants to receive the same maintenance immunosuppressive therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors extracted data independently. RevMan analysis was used for statistical analysis of dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR), and of continuous data with mean difference (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological components were used to assess risks of systematic errors (bias). Trial sequential analysis was used to assess the risks of random errors (play of chance). We assessed mortality, acute rejection, infection, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, cancer, adverse events, chronic allograft vasculopathy, renal function, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidaemia.

MAIN RESULTS

In this review, we included 22 RCTs that investigated the use of T-cell antibody induction, with a total of 1427 heart-transplant recipients. All trials were judged to be at a high risk of bias. Five trials, with a total of 606 participants, compared any kind of T-cell antibody induction versus no antibody induction; four trials, with a total of 576 participants, compared interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2 RA) versus no induction; one trial, with 30 participants, compared monoclonal antibody (other than IL-2 RA) versus no antibody induction; two trials, with a total of 159 participants, compared IL-2 RA versus monoclonal antibody (other than IL-2 RA) induction; four trials, with a total of 185 participants, compared IL-2 RA versus polyclonal antibody induction; seven trials, with a total of 315 participants, compared monoclonal antibody (other than IL-2 RA) versus polyclonal antibody induction; and four trials, with a total of 162 participants, compared polyclonal antibody induction versus another kind, or dose of polyclonal antibodies.No significant differences were found for any of the comparisons for the outcomes of mortality, infection, CMV infection, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, cancer, adverse events, chronic allograft vasculopathy, renal function, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or hyperlipidaemia. Acute rejection occurred significantly less frequently when IL-2 RA induction was compared with no induction (93/284 (33%) versus 132/292 (45%); RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90; I(2) 57%) applying the fixed-effect model. No significant difference was found when the random-effects model was applied (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.17; I(2) 57%). In addition, acute rejection occurred more often statistically when IL-2 RA induction was compared with polyclonal antibody induction (24/90 (27%) versus 10/95 (11%); RR 2.43; 95% CI 1.01 to 5.86; I(2) 28%). For all of these differences in acute rejection, trial sequential alpha-spending boundaries were not crossed and the required information sizes were not reached when trial sequential analysis was performed, indicating that we cannot exclude random errors.We observed some occasional significant differences in adverse events in some of the comparisons, however definitions of adverse events varied between trials, and numbers of participants and events in these outcomes were too small to allow definitive conclusions to be drawn.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that acute rejection might be reduced by IL-2 RA compared with no induction, and by polyclonal antibody induction compared with IL-2 RA, though trial sequential analyses cannot exclude random errors, and the significance of our observations depended on the statistical model used. Furthermore, this review does not show other clear benefits or harms associated with the use of any kind of T-cell antibody induction compared with no induction, or when one type of T-cell antibody is compared with another type of antibody. The number of trials investigating the use of antibodies against T-cells for induction after heart transplantation is small, and the number of participants and outcomes in these RCTs is limited. Furthermore, the included trials are at a high risk of bias. Hence, more RCTs are needed to assess the benefits and harms of T-cell antibody induction for heart-transplant recipients. Such trials ought to be conducted with low risks of systematic and random error.

Current strategies and future trends in immunosuppression after heart transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current immunosuppressive drugs have provided excellent outcomes after heart transplantation. However, more patients suffer from long-term complications of these drugs. A series of prospective randomized trials has been conducted and has offered disparate results. This report reviews the challenges of immunosuppressive therapy during the past decade, describes recent reports and explores potential future trends in immunosuppressive protocols in heart transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The traditional combination of cyclosporine, azathioprine and steroids has been changed to tacrolimus (Tac) or cyclosporine in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids due to the results of several trials. The use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in combination with Tac or cyclosporine A has not shown a clear benefit compared with MMF. All different combinations have shown some positive effects counteracted by side-effects and negative synergism of combinations. Future protocols need to be adapted according to individual patient's needs and risks.

SUMMARY

The changing population of heart transplantation patients has become older and sicker. Immunosuppression strategies should be developed for each patient based on their risk for rejection and their risk for developing important complications of immunosuppressive therapy.

Alemtuzumab for cytolytic induction of immunosuppression in heart transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE

To review available evidence about the safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab for induction of immunosuppression in heart transplant recipients.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were conducted. Key search terms included alemtuzumab, Campath-1H, CD52, lymphocyte, cytolytic, induction, immunosuppression, rejection, and cardiac transplantation. Additional pertinent data were identified through a search of abstracts from major transplant meetings.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All English-language articles and abstracts identified from the data sources were evaluated. All primary data were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the safety or efficacy of alemtuzumab for induction of immunosuppression in heart transplant patients. One retrospective cohort, 1 case series, 1 case-control series, and 1 open-label trial were identified and included for review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Acute cellular rejection occurs in 40% to 70% of heart transplant recipients within the first 6 months after transplant and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Depleting and nondepleting antibodies have displayed positive outcomes in inducing immunosuppression; however, the ideal induction strategy that balances efficacy and toxicity remains elusive. Alemtuzumab, a cytolytic anti-CD52 antibody, has been used to induce immunosuppression in kidney, pancreas, liver, intestine, and lung transplant recipients, and its use in heart transplant has been investigated. Studies of use of alemtuzumab to induce immunosuppression in heart transplant patients have shown low rates of rejection; however, it has not been directly compared with other immunosuppression-inducing agents and safety data are limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Although alemtuzumab may be a practical option for inducing immunosuppression, data are insufficient to recommend its routine use in deference to more established agents. Large, randomized clinical trials with extended durations of follow-up must be conducted to characterize its efficacy and safety further.

The future of heart transplantation

The field of heart transplantation has seen significant progress in the past 40 years. However, the breakthroughs in long-term outcome have seen stagnation in the past decade. Through advances in genomics and transcriptomics, there is hope that an era of personalized transplant therapy lies in the future. To see where heart transplantation truly fits into the long term, searching for and understanding the alternative approaches for heart failure therapy is both important and inevitable. The application of mechanical circulatory support has contributed to the largest advancement in treatment of end stage heart failure. It has already been approved for destination therapy of heart failure, and greater portability and ease of use of the device will be the future trend. Although it is still not prime time for stem cell therapy, clinical experiences have already suggested its potential therapeutic effects. And finally, whole organ engineering is on the horizon as new techniques have opened the way for this to proceed. In the end, progress on alternative therapies largely depends on our deeper understanding of the mechanisms of heart failure and how to prevent it.

Effects of immunoglobulin to prevent coronary allograft vasculopathy in heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Although 100,000 cardiac transplants have been performed, coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV), which is a phenomenon of chronic rejection, is still a serious problem.

AREAS COVERED

Several adhesion molecules, cytokines, and chemokines play a critical role in the process. Recent investigations have proved some promising methodologies for preventing or treating rejection. Although immunoglobulins are known to be an effective treatment in many diseases, their effect on cardiac transplantation or CAV is to be elucidated.

EXPERT OPINION

In this review article, we described some promising methodologies that use immunoglobulins to prevent CAV. Immunoglobulins may be used to prevent CAV.

Management of children undergoing cardiac transplantation with high Panel Reactive Antibodies

Highly sensitised children in need of cardiac transplantation have overall poor outcomes because of increased risk for dysfunction of the cardiac allograft, acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection, and vasculopathy of the cardiac allograft. Cardiopulmonary bypass and the frequent use of blood products in the operating room and cardiac intensive care unit, as well as the frequent use of homografts, have predisposed potential recipients of transplants to allosensitisation. The expansion in the use of ventricular assist devices and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has also contributed to increasing rates of allosensitisation in candidates for cardiac transplantation. Antibodies to Human Leukocyte Antigen can be detected before transplantation using several different techniques, the most common being the "complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity assays". "Solid-phase assays", particularly the "Luminex® single antigen bead method", offer improved specificity and more detailed information regarding specificities of antibodies, leading to improved matching of donors with recipients. Allosensitisation prolongs the time on the waiting list for potential recipients of transplantation and increases the risk of complications and death after transplantation. Aggressive reduction of antibodies to Human Leukocyte Antigen in these high-risk patients is therefore of vital importance for long-term survival of the patient and cardiac allograft. Strategies to decrease Panel Reactive Antibody or percent reactive antibody before transplantation include plasmapheresis, intravenous administration of immunoglobulin, and specific treatment to reduce B-cells, particularly Rituximab. These strategies have resulted in varying degrees of success. Antibody-mediated rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy are two of the most important complications of transplantation in patients with high Panel Reactive Antibody. The treatment of antibody-mediated rejection in recipients of cardiac transplants is largely empirical and includes the use of high-dose corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, intravenous administration of immunoglobulins, anti-thymocyte globulin, and Rituximab. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy is believed to be secondary to chronic complement-mediated endothelial injury and chronic vascular rejection. The use of proliferation signal inhibitors, such as sirolimus and everolimus, has been shown to delay the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. In some non-sensitised recipients of cardiac transplants, the de novo formation of antibodies to Human Leukocyte Antigen after transplantation may increase the likelihood of adverse clinical outcomes. The use of serial testing for donor-specific antibodies after cardiac transplantation may be advisable in patients with frequent episodes of rejection and patients with history of sensitisation. Allosensitisation before transplantation can negatively influence outcomes after transplantation. A high incidence of antibody-mediated rejection and graft vasculopathy can result in graft failure and decreased survival. Current strategies to decrease allosensitisation have helped to expand the pool of donors, improve times on the waiting list, and decrease mortality. Centres of transplantation offering desensitisation are currently using plasmapheresis to remove circulating antibodies; intravenous immunoglobulin to inactivate antibodies; cyclophosphamide to suppress B-cell proliferation; and Rituximab to deplete B-lymphocytes. Similar approaches are also used to treat antibody-mediated rejection after transplantation with promising results.

Some observations on prope tolerance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To outline the rationale of powerful depleting induction therapy with alemtuzumab and minimal maintenance immunosuppression after organ transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The original observations in principle have been confirmed by many independent centres.

SUMMARY

Follow-up of the 'prope tolerance' protocol has confirmed a low incidence of rejection, infection and post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Especially, encouraging results were obtained in African-Americans. There were few side effects and the regimen was well tolerated by patients. Treg cells were observed in the circulation, which could be an important factor in the mechanisms of graft acceptance using a prope tolerance regimen. There was a considerable reduction in the costs of the transplantation procedure. It is suggested that this minimalisation of maintenance immunosuppression is the best therapy currently available that we can offer to our patients.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: the final frontier for lung transplantation

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a form of chronic lung allograft dysfunction that affects a majority of lung transplant recipients and is the principal factor limiting long-term transplant survival. BOS is characterized by progressive airflow obstruction unexplained by acute rejection, infection, or other coexistent condition. Although BOS is a proven useful clinical syndrome that identifies patients at increased risk for death, its clinical course and underlying causative factors are now recognized to be increasingly heterogeneous. Regardless of the clinical history, the primary pathologic correlate of BOS is bronchiolitis obliterans, a condition of intraluminal airway fibrosis. This article highlights the body of developing research illustrating the mechanisms by which BOS is mediated, including alloimmune reactivity, the emerging roles of humoral and autoimmunity, activation of innate immune cells, and response to nonimmune-related allograft insults, such as infection and aspiration. In addition, we underscore emerging clinical implications and promising future translational research directions that have the potential to advance our knowledge and improve patient outcomes.

Five-year outcomes with alemtuzumab induction after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Induction therapy with alemtuzumab, followed by lower than conventional intensity post-transplant immunosuppression (eg, tacrolimus monotherapy), has been associated with reduced morbidity and mortality in abdominal and heart transplantation. We examined 5-year outcomes in lung recipients receiving alemtuzumab in conjunction with reduced-intensity post-transplant immunosuppression (early lower-dose tacrolimus; lower-dose steroids, with or without mycophenolate mofetil), compared with lung recipients receiving other induction agents or no induction in association with post-transplant immunosuppression.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed using prospectively collected data from a single-site clinical database of 336 lung recipients (aged ≥ 18) who received allografts between 1998 and 2005, classified by induction type: alemtuzumab, 127; Thymoglobulin, 43; daclizumab, 73; and none, 93. Survival analyses examined patient and graft survival, and freedom from acute cellular rejection (ACR), lymphocytic bronchiolitis, obliterative bronchiolitis (OB), bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD).

RESULTS

Five-year patient and graft survival differed by group (p = 0.046, p = 0.038, respectively). Alemtuzumab patient/graft survival rates were 59%/59%. Survival rates were 60%/44% for Thymoglobulin, 47%/46% for no induction, and 44%/41% for daclizumab. Freedom from ACR, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, OB, and BOS differed by group (all values, p < 0.008); alemtuzumab recipients showed greater 5-year freedom from each outcome (30%/82%/86%/54%) than Thymoglobulin (20%/54%/62%/27%), daclizumab (19%/55%/70%/43%), and no-induction groups (18%/70%/69%/46%). The groups did not differ in PTLD rates (≥ 94% free of PTLD at 5 years; p = 0.864). Effects were unchanged after controlling for potential covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab induction may be associated with improved outcomes in lung transplantation. Randomized controlled trials are needed to establish any effects of this agent.

Heart transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper briefly and subjectively reviews a number of the modest or tentative, but noteworthy, advances in heart transplantation that have been made during the past 18 months or so.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advances reviewed concern the selection of recipients, the management of the heart transplantation waiting list, the management of donors, post-heart transplant monitoring of immunological status, the early diagnosis of rejection, the role of mammalian target of rapamycine inhibitors and induction agents, and the definition and grading of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

SUMMARY

The findings reviewed indicate progress in the clarification of issues that were in most cases already being investigated. Further studies will in general be needed before corresponding measures are adopted in clinical practice.

Immunosuppression in the sensitized heart transplant recipient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The proportion of heart transplant candidates who are allosensitized has increased over time. Advances in tissue typing and immunosuppression have improved the rate of successful transplant in this challenging population. Recently published data regarding contemporary approaches to desensitization prior to and immunosuppression following transplant are summarized.

RECENT FINDINGS

Continued progress in measurement and characterization of antibodies and strategies to abrogate antibody production both prior to and following heart transplant have been encouraging. Updates on the role of non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and the impact of mechanical circulatory support on allosensitization are provided. Data on current desensitization strategies, including the increasing use of monoclonal antibodies, are provided and the potential role of complement inhibitors will be reviewed. Increasing experience with potent novel agents is likely to provide the opportunity to improve transplant outcomes for highly sensitized patients.

SUMMARY

Although allosensitized heart transplant candidates remain a management challenge, excellent outcomes can be achieved with contemporary approaches. Advances in the understanding of B-cell biology are anticipated to further broaden options and improve outcomes.

Immunosuppression armamentarium in 2010: mechanistic and clinical considerations

Effective immunosuppression is the key to successful organ transplantation, with success being defined as minimal rejection risk with concomitant minimal drug toxicities. Despite the general recognition of this fact, a paucity of appropriate clinical trials in children has contributed to lack of standardization of clinical management regimens, resulting in an extensive diversity of favored approaches. Nonetheless, although consensus has not been reached on the ideal approach to immunosuppression in pediatric transplantation, new drug therapies have contributed to a continuing improvement in graft and patient survival. Future clinical research must focus on diminishing the extensive burden of toxicities of these therapeutic agents in children.