Five-year outcomes with alemtuzumab induction after lung transplantation

Conventional and Novel Approaches to Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation

Most therapeutic advances in immunosuppression have occurred over the past few decades. Although modern strategies have been effective in reducing acute cellular rejection, excess immunosuppression comes at the price of toxicity, opportunistic infection, and malignancy. As our understanding of the immune system and allograft rejection becomes more nuanced, there is an opportunity to evolve immunosuppression protocols to optimize longer term outcomes while mitigating the deleterious effects of traditional protocols.

Everolimus Use in Lung Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Most lung transplantation centers prefer triple immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. However, to prevent complications and comorbidities caused by tacrolimus, replacing the drug with everolimus has been considered.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study investigating everolimus switch for different reasons. The population was divided into 3 groups: chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), kidney impairment, and malignant neoplasm groups. We investigated whether we achieved the goal of the switch and the frequency of rejection, cytomegalovirus and fungal infections, and everolimus adverse effects.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients received everolimus therapy, and 5 of these were for CLAD, 7 for tacrolimus nephrotoxicity, and 7 for explant/de novo malignant neoplasm. The patients were followed up for a mean (SD) of 30 (16.7) months under the therapy. The number of acute cellular rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, and aspergillosis infection cases before switch were 7, 13, and 2, respectively, and 7, 2, and 3 after that. The mean values of creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate of the whole population after the switch improved with no statistical significance, whereas it was significant in tacrolimus nephrotoxicity group. Three patients in the CLAD group remained stable after switching, whereas 2 progressed. Only 1 of the 7 patients with malignant neoplasms had a recurrence during 31.1 (16.5) months of median follow-up. Eleven cases of everolimus adverse effects occurred in 9 patients (47.3%), with 2 (10.5%) withdrawal events. Kidney impairment (P = .02) and age (P = .05) stood out as significant risk factors for drug adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

After lung transplant, everolimus can be a safe alternative for immunosuppression with acceptable adverse effects.

Pharmacotherapy of chronic lung allograft dysfunction post lung transplantation

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains the primary cause of death in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) in spite of improvements in immunosuppression management. Despite advances in knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of CLAD, treatments that are currently available are usually ineffective and delay progression of disease at best. There are currently no evidence-based guidelines for the optimal treatment of CLAD, and management varies widely across transplant centers. Additionally, there are minimal publications available to summarize data for currently available therapies and outcomes in LTRs. We identified the major domains of the medical management of CLAD and conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases to identify articles published from inception to December 2021 related to CLAD in LTRs. Studies published in English pertaining to the pharmacologic prevention and treatment of CLAD were included; highest priority was given to prospective, randomized, controlled trials if available. Prospective observational and retrospective controlled trials were prioritized next, followed by retrospective uncontrolled studies, case series, and finally case reports if the information was deemed to be pertinent. Reference lists of qualified publications were also reviewed to find any other publications of interest that were not found on initial search. In the absence of literature published in the aforementioned databases, additional articles were identified by reviewing abstracts presented at the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation and American Transplant Congress annual meetings between 2010-2021. This document serves to provide a comprehensive review of the literature and considerations for the prevention and medical management of CLAD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Induction Strategies in Lung Transplantation: Alemtuzumab vs. Basiliximab a Single-Center Experience

Background

Induction therapy is used in about 80% of lung transplant centers and is increasing globally. Currently, there are no standards or guidelines for the use of induction therapy. At our institution, we have two induction strategies, basiliximab, and alemtuzumab. The goal of this manuscript is to share our experience and practice since this is an area of controversy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 807 lung transplants performed at our institution between 2011 and 2020. Indications for the use of the basiliximab protocol were as follows: patients over the age of 70 years, history of cancer, hepatitis C virus or human immunodeficiency virus infection history, and cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus (donor positive/ recipient negative). In the absence of these clinical factors, the alemtuzumab protocol was used.

Results

453 patients underwent alemtuzumab induction and 354 patients underwent basiliximab. There were significant differences in delayed chest closure (24.7% alemtuzumab vs 31.4% basiliximab, p = 0.037), grade 3 primary graft dysfunction observed within 72 hours (19.9% alemtuzumab vs 29.9% basiliximab, p = 0.002), postoperative hepatic dysfunction (8.8% alemtuzumab vs 14.7% basiliximab, p = 0.009), acute cellular rejection in first year (39.1% alemtuzumab vs 53.4% basiliximab, p < 0.001). The overall survival rate of the patients with alemtuzumab induction was significantly higher than those of the patients with basiliximab induction (5 years survival rate: 64.1% alemtuzumab vs 52.3%, basiliximab, p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed lower 5-year survival for basiliximab induction (HR = 1.41, p = 0.02), recipient cytomegalovirus positive (HR = 1.49, p = 0.01), postoperative hepatic dysfunction (HR = 2.20, p < 0.001), and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (HR = 2.27, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this single center retrospective review, there was a significant difference in survival rates between induction strategies. This outcome may be attributable to differences in recipient characteristics between the groups. However, the Alemtuzumab group experienced less episodes of acute cellular rejection within the first year.

Differential expression of circulating miRNAs after alemtuzumab induction therapy in lung transplantation

Alemtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD52, used as induction therapy after lung transplantation (LTx). Its engagement produces a long-lasting immunodepletion; however, the mechanisms driving cell reconstitution are poorly defined. We hypothesized that miRNAs are involved in this process. The expression of a set of miRNAs, cytokines and co-signaling molecules was measured with RT-qPCR and flow cytometry in prospectively collected serum samples of LTx recipients, after alemtuzumab or no induction therapy. Twenty-six LTx recipients who received alemtuzumab and twenty-seven matched LTx recipients without induction therapy were included in the analysis. One year after transplantation four miRNAs were differentially regulated: miR-23b (p = 0.05) miR-146 (p = 0.04), miR-155 (p < 0.001) and miR-486 (p < 0.001). Expression of 3 miRNAs changed within the alemtuzumab group: miR-146 (p < 0.001), miR-155 (p < 0.001) and miR-31 (p < 0.001). Levels of IL-13, IL-4, IFN-γ, BAFF, IL-5, IL-9, IL-17F, IL-17A and IL-22 were different one year after transplantation compared to baseline. In no-induction group, concentration of sCD27, sB7.2 and sPD-L1 increased overtime. Expression of miR-23b, miR-146, miR-486, miR-155 and miR-31 was different in LTx recipients who received alemtuzumab compared to recipients without induction therapy. The observed cytokine pattern suggested proliferation of specific B cell subsets in alemtuzumab group and co-stimulation of T-cells in no-induction group.

Modeling the Potential of Treg-Based Therapies for Transplant Rejection: Effect of Dose, Timing, and Accumulation Site

Introduction: The adoptive transfer of regulatory T cells (Tregs) has emerged as a method to promote graft tolerance. Clinical trials have demonstrated the safety of adoptive transfer and are now assessing their therapeutic efficacy. Strategies that generate large numbers of antigen specific Tregs are even more efficacious. However, the combinations of factors that influence the outcome of adoptive transfer are too numerous to be tested experimentally. Here, mathematical modeling is used to predict the most impactful treatment scenarios. Methods: We adapted our mathematical model of murine heart transplant rejection to simulate Treg adoptive transfer and to correlate therapeutic efficacy with Treg dose and timing, frequency of administration, and distribution of injected cells. Results: The model predicts that Tregs directly accumulating to the graft are more protective than Tregs localizing to draining lymph nodes. Inhibiting antigen-presenting cell maturation and effector functions at the graft site was more effective at modulating rejection than inhibition of T cell activation in lymphoid tissues. These complex dynamics define non-intuitive relationships between graft survival and timing and frequency of adoptive transfer. Conclusion: This work provides the framework for better understanding the impact of Treg adoptive transfer and will guide experimental design to improve interventions.

Risk factors of bronchial dehiscence after primary lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of bronchial dehiscence following lung transplantation has decreased significantly due to improvements in perioperative managements and surgical techniques, it remains a devastating postoperative complication associated with high morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 811 lung transplantation performed at our institution between January 2011 and December 2020. Bronchial dehiscence was confirmed with flexible bronchoscopy, computed tomography (CT) scan, or clinical findings grade using International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation recommendations.

RESULTS

Bronchial dehiscence was diagnosed in 38 patients (4.7%). The overall survival rates of the patients with bronchial dehiscence were significantly worse than those of the patients without bronchial dehiscence (p = .003). Multivariate analysis identified use of our basiliximab induction protocol (odds ratio = 3.03, p = .008) as an independent predictive factor of postoperative airway dehiscence in our multivariable model, along with total ventilator duration (odds ratio = 1.02, p = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our analysis, patients that underwent our basiliximab induction protocol for lung transplantation experienced a higher rate of postoperative bronchial dehiscence when compared with patients who receive alemtuzumab induction. We believe this may be associated with a higher steroid exposure in this population. Additional studies are necessary to further characterize the relationship between different induction protocols and bronchial dehiscence following transplantation.

Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation

Immunosuppression in lung transplantation is an area devoid of robust clinical data. This chapter will review the history of immunosuppression in lung transplantation. Additionally, it will evaluate the three classes of induction, maintenance, and rescue immunosuppression in detail. Induction immunosuppression in lung transplantation aims to decrease incidence of lung allograft rejection, however infectious risk must be considered when determining if induction is appropriate and which agent is most favorable. Similar to other solid organ transplant patient populations, a multi-drug approach is commonly prescribed for maintenance immunosuppression to minimize single agent drug toxicities. Emphasis of this review is placed on key medication considerations including dosing, adverse effects, and drug interactions. Clinical considerations will be reviewed per drug class given available literature. Finally, acute cellular, antibody mediated, and chronic rejection are reviewed.

Outcomes with alemtuzumab induction therapy in lung transplantation: a comprehensive large-scale single-center analysis

Alemtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD52, increasingly used as induction therapy after transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of alemtuzumab induction therapy followed by a low-dose maintenance immunosuppression in a large single-center cohort of lung transplant recipients. All patients, who received alemtuzumab induction followed by a low-dose maintenance immunosuppression were included in the analysis. Short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed. 721 lung transplant recipients, transplanted between January 2008 and June 2019, were included in this retrospective study. Freedom from higher-grade ACR at 1, 5, and 10 years was 98%, 96%, and 96%, respectively. Thirty-nine patients (5%) developed clinical AMR. Twenty-one percent of patients developed high-grade CKD. A total of 1488 infections were recorded. Sixteen percent were diagnosed within the first 3 months. Sixty-two patients (9%) developed a malignancy during follow-up. Freedom from CLAD at 1, 5, and 10 years was 94%, 72%, and 53%, respectively. Overall survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 85%, 71%, and 61%, respectively. Alemtuzumab induction combined with a low-dose tacrolimus protocol is safe and associated with low rates of acute and chronic rejection, as well as an excellent long-term survival.

Acute Rejection in the Modern Lung Transplant Era

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) remains a common complication after lung transplantation. Mortality directly related to ACR is low and most patients respond to first-line immunosuppressive treatment. However, a subset of patients may develop refractory or recurrent ACR leading to an accelerated lung function decline and ultimately chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Infectious complications associated with the intensification of immunosuppression can also negatively impact long-term survival. In this review, we summarize the most recent evidence on the mechanisms, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of ACR. We specifically focus on novel, promising biomarkers which are under investigation for their potential to improve the diagnostic performance of transbronchial biopsies. Finally, for each topic, we highlight current gaps in knowledge and areas for future research.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Evolving Concepts and Therapies

The primary factor that limits long-term survival after lung transplantation is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD also impairs quality of life and increases the costs of medical care. Our understanding of CLAD continues to evolve. Consensus definitions of CLAD and the major CLAD phenotypes were recently updated and clarified, but it remains to be seen whether the current definitions will lead to advances in management or impact care. Understanding the potential differences in pathogenesis for each CLAD phenotype may lead to novel therapeutic strategies, including precision medicine. Recognition of CLAD risk factors may lead to earlier interventions to mitigate risk, or to avoid risk factors all together, to prevent the development of CLAD. Unfortunately, currently available therapies for CLAD are usually not effective. However, novel therapeutics aimed at both prevention and treatment are currently under investigation. We provide an overview of the updates to CLAD-related terminology, clinical phenotypes and their diagnosis, natural history, pathogenesis, and potential strategies to treat and prevent CLAD.

Combined low-dose everolimus and low-dose tacrolimus after Alemtuzumab induction therapy: a randomized prospective trial in lung transplantation

Background

Long-term outcomes of lung transplantation are severely affected by comorbidities and development of chronic rejection. Among the comorbidities, kidney insufficiency is one of the most frequent and it is mainly caused by the cumulative effect of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). Currently, the most used immunosuppression protocols worldwide include induction therapy and a triple-drug maintenance immunosuppression, with one calcineurin inhibitor, one anti-proliferative drug, and steroids. Our center has pioneered the use of alemtuzumab as induction therapy, showing promising results in terms of short- and long-term outcomes. The use of alemtuzumab followed by a low-dose double drug maintenance immunosuppression, in fact, led to better kidney function along with excellent results in terms of acute rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and survival (Benazzo et al., PLoS One 14(1):e0210443, 2019). The hypothesis driving the proposed clinical trial is that de novo introduction of low-dose everolimus early after transplantation could further improve kidney function via a further reduction of tacrolimus. Based on evidences from kidney transplantation, moreover, alemtuzumab induction therapy followed by a low-dose everolimus and low-dose tacrolimus may have a permissive action on regulatory immune cells thus stimulating allograft acceptance.

Methods

A randomized prospective clinical trial has been set up to answer the research hypothesis. One hundred ten patients will be randomized in two groups. Treatment group will receive the new maintenance immunosuppression protocol based on low-dose tacrolimus and low-dose everolimus and the control group will receive our standard immunosuppression protocol. Both groups will receive alemtuzumab induction therapy. The primary endpoint of the study is to analyze the effect of the new low-dose immunosuppression protocol on kidney function in terms of eGFR change. The study will have a duration of 24 months from the time of randomization. Immunomodulatory status of the patients will be assessed with flow cytometry and gene expression analysis.

Discussion

For the first time in the field of lung transplantation, this trial proposes the combined use of significantly reduced tacrolimus and everolimus after alemtuzumab induction. The new protocol may have a twofold advantage: (1) further reduction of nephrotoxic tacrolimus and (2) permissive influence on regulatory cells development with further reduction of rejection episodes.

Trial registration

EUDRACT Nr 2018-001680-24. Registered on 15 May 2018

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis lung transplant recipients are at increased risk for EBV-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder and worse survival

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV-PTLD) is a serious complication in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) associated with significant mortality. We performed a single-center retrospective study to evaluate the risks for PTLD in LTRs over a 7-year period. Of 611 evaluable LTRs, we identified 28 cases of PTLD, with an incidence of 4.6%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a decreased freedom from PTLD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)-LTRs (P < .02). Using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, we found IPF (hazard ratio [HR] 3.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-8.21, P = .01) and alemtuzumab induction therapy (HR 2.73, 95% CI 1.10-6.74, P = .03) as risk factors for PTLD, compared to EBV mismatch (HR: 34.43, 95% CI 15.57-76.09, P < .0001). Early PTLD (first year) was associated with alemtuzumab use (P = .04), whereas IPF was a predictor for late PTLD (after first year) (P = .002), after controlling for age and sex. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a shorter time to death from PTLD in IPF LTRs compared to other patients (P = .04). The use of alemtuzumab in EBV mismatch was found to particularly increase PTLD risk. Together, our findings identify IPF LTRs as a susceptible population for PTLD. Further studies are required to understand the mechanisms driving PTLD in IPF LTRs and develop strategies to mitigate risk.

Lymphoproliferative disorder in a lung transplant recipient

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is uncommon following solid organ transplantation. We present a case of PTLD presenting as hematochezia and abdominal pain in a 66-year-old man, who had undergone bilateral lung transplantation with alemtuzumab induction 7 months prior to presentation. The transplant serologic status was "high-risk" for the presence of both Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serologies in the donor and negative serologies in the recipient. Biopsies taken during colonoscopy stained strongly positive for EBV-encoded RNA. Mediastinal lymph node biopsies also showed atypical, EBV-positive lymphohistiocytic infiltration with focal necrosis. The patient's hospital course was complicated by treatment side effects, most notably bowel perforation following rituximab. In this case report the topic of PTLD is reviewed and consideration is given to whether alemtuzumab induction may have contributed to the patient's development of PTLD.

Immunosuppressive strategies in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is a viable option for those with end-stage lung disease which is evidenced by the continued increase in the number of lung transplantations worldwide. However, patients and clinicians are constantly faced with acute and chronic rejection, infectious complications, drug toxicities, and malignancies throughout the lifetime of the lung transplant recipient. Conventional maintenance immunosuppression therapy consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), anti-metabolite, and corticosteroids have become the standard regimen but newer agents and modalities continue to be developed. Here we will review induction agents, maintenance immunosuppressives, adjunctive therapies and other strategies to improve long-term outcomes.

Alemtuzumab induction combined with reduced maintenance immunosuppression is associated with improved outcomes after lung transplantation: A single centre experience

Question addressed by the study

The value of induction therapy in lung transplantation is controversial. According to the ISHLT, only about 50% of patients transplanted within the last 10 years received induction therapy. We reviewed our institutional experience to investigate the impact of induction therapy on short- and long-term outcomes.

Materials/Patients and methods

Between 2007 and 2015, 446 patients with a complete follow-up were included in this retrospective analysis. Analysis comprised long-term kidney function, infectious complications, incidence of rejection and overall survival.

Results

A total of 231 patients received alemtuzumab, 50 patients antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and 165 patients did not receive induction therapy (NI). The alemtuzumab group revealed the lowest rate of chronic kidney insufficiency (NI: 52.2%; ATG: 60%; alemtuzumab: 36.6%; p = 0.001). Both, the NI group (p<0.001) and the ATG group (p = 0.010) showed a significant increase of serum creatinine during follow-up compared to alemtuzumab patients. Furthermore, alemtuzumab group experienced the lowest rate of infection in the first year after transplantation. Finally, improved survival, low rates of acute cellular rejection (ACR), lymphocytic bronchiolitis (LB) and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) were found in patients treated either with alemtuzumab or ATG.

Conclusion

Alemtuzumab induction therapy followed by reduced maintenance immunosuppression is associated with a better kidney function compared to no induction and ATG. Survival rate as well as freedom from ACR and CLAD were comparable between alemtuzumab and ATG.

Acute Cellular Rejection and Infection Rates in Alemtuzumab vs Traditional Induction Therapy Agents for Lung and Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Heart and lung transplantation is a high-risk procedure requiring intensive immunosuppressive therapy for preventing organ rejection. Alemtuzumab, a CD52-specific monoclonal antibody, is increasingly used for induction therapy compared with conventional agents. However, there has been no systematic review comparing its efficacy with traditional therapeutic drugs.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE were searched to October 1, 2017, for articles on alemtuzumab in cardiothoracic transplant surgery. Of the 433 studies retrieved, 8 were included in the final meta-analysis.

RESULTS

In lung transplantation, alemtuzumab use was associated with lower odds of acute cellular rejection compared with antithymocyte globulin (odds ratio [OR], 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11-0.40; P < .001), lower acute rejection rates (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.55; P < .01), and infection rates (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.35-1.36; P = .33) when compared with basiliximab. Multivariate meta-regression analysis found that mean age, male sex, single lung transplant, double lung transplant, cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus status, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, and mean ischemic time did not significantly influence acute rejection outcomes. For heart transplantation, alemtuzumab use was associated with lower acute rejection rates when compared with tacrolimus (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.66; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab use was associated with lower rejection rates when compared with conventional induction therapy agents (antithymocyte globulin, basiliximab, and tacrolimus) in heart and lung transplantation. However, this was based on observational studies. Randomized controlled trials are needed to verify its clinical use.

New frontiers in immunosuppression

Immunosuppressive therapy is arguably the most important component of medical care after lung transplantation. The goal of immunosuppression is to prevent acute and chronic rejection while maximizing patient survival and long-term allograft function. However, the benefits of immunosuppressive therapy must be balanced against the side effects and major toxicities of these medications. Immunosuppressive agents can be classified as induction agents, maintenance therapies, treatments for acute rejection and chronic rejection and antibody directed therapies. Although induction therapy remains an area of controversy in lung transplantation, it is still used in the majority of transplant centers. On the other hand, maintenance immunosuppression is less contentious; but, unfortunately, since the creation of three-drug combination therapy, including a glucocorticoid, calcineurin inhibitor and anti-metabolite, there have been relatively modest improvements in chronic maintenance immunosuppressive regimens. The presence of HLA antibodies in transplant candidates and development of de novo antibodies after transplantation remain a major therapeutic challenge before and after lung transplantation. In this chapter we review the medications used for induction and maintenance immunosuppression along with their efficacy and side effect profiles. We also review strategies and evidence for HLA desensitization prior to lung transplantation and management of de novo antibody formation after transplant. Finally, we review immune tolerance and the future of lung transplantation to limit the toxicities of conventional immunosuppressive therapy.

Immunosuppressive Treatment and Its Effect on the Occurrence of Pneumocystis jiroveci, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pnemoniae, and Legionella pneumophila Infections/Colonizations Among Lung Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of infections caused by Pneumocystis jiroveci, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae among lung transplant recipients in the context of immunosuppression.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 94 patients (37 women and 57 men; mean age 42.03 years) transplanted between 2009 and 2016 at the Silesia Center for Heart Diseases (SCCS). Immunosuppressive treatment (induction and maintenance therapy) was assessed. The immunofluorescence methods were used to detect the P. jiroveci, L. pneumophila, C. pneumoniae, and M. pneumoniae antigens in samples obtained from the respiratory tract.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of 94 graft recipients developed atypical or opportunistic infection. The median time of its occurrence was 178 days after transplantation. P. jiroveci was responsible for 84.38% of first infections. Five patients developed infection with P. jiroveci and C. pneumoniae. None of the infections occurred during induction of immunosuppression. An opportunistic or atypical infection developed in 19.35% of the patients treated with a tacrolimus-based regimen, and in 43.33% of patients on a cyclosporine-based regimen.

CONCLUSION

Infection with P. jiroveci is a recognized problem after lung transplantation and should be monitored. The percentage of infected patients is higher in patients treated with a cyclosporine-based regimen in comparison to those treated with tacrolimus.

Prevention of chronic rejection after lung transplantation

Long-term survival after lung transplantation (LTx) is limited by chronic rejection (CR). Therapeutic strategies for CR have been largely unsuccessful, making prevention of CR an important and challenging therapeutic approach. In the current review, we will discuss current clinical evidence regarding prevention of CR after LTx.

Increased risk of PTLD in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation. Recipients with cystic fibrosis (CF) may have an increased risk of PTLD although the literature is limited to single center cohorts. Our primary aim is to examine PTLD in an adult lung transplant population by utilizing the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry.

METHODS

We studied 30,598 adult recipients of lung transplants performed between 1999 and 2011. The primary outcome was development of and time to PTLD. In addition to indication for transplant, other predictors examined included Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus, gender, and age. Outcomes were assessed with univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to obtain hazard ratios (HR).

RESULTS

17% of the cohort had a diagnosis of CF. PTLD developed in 2% of CF recipients compared to 1% for non-CF recipients (p<0.001). Compared to non-CF recipients, CF recipients had higher prevalence of EBV and CMV seronegativity and higher prevalences of high risk EBV and CMV mismatch (D+/R-). There is a significant association between CF and the development of PTLD [HR 1.66 (95% CI 1.30-2.12)]. Stratified multivariable analysis controlling for age revealed EBV negative non-CF recipients have an almost 2 fold increased risk of developing PTLD, whereas EBV negative CF recipients had an almost 6.5 fold increased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

CF recipients have a higher risk for PTLD compared to non-CF recipients. Further studies are needed to account for additional risk factors and management in this population post-transplant.

Rescue alemtuzumab for refractory acute cellular rejection and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation

Refractory acute cellular rejection (rACR) is associated with death and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) post-lung transplantation. We report the largest cohort of lung transplant recipients (LTRs) treated with rescue alemtuzumab for rACR or BOS. RACR outcomes included burden of ACR 30 days before and 180 days after rescue assessed by a novel composite rejection standardized score (CRSS, range 0-6) and freedom from ≥A2 ACR. BOS outcomes included freedom from BOS progression and FEV1 decline >10%. Univariate parametric and nonparametric statistical approaches were used to assess treatment response. Kaplan-Meier method with log rank conversion was used to assess freedom from events. Fifty-seven alemtuzumab doses (ACR 40 and BOS 17) given to 51 patients were included. Median time to rescue was 722 (IQR 42-1403) days. CRSS declined significantly (3 vs 0.67, P<0.001) after rescue. Freedom from ≥A2 was 62.5% in rACR. Freedom from BOS progression was 52.9% at 180 days in the BOS cohort. Freedom from FEV1 decline >10% was 70% in BOS grade 1 and 14.3% in advanced BOS grades 2-3. Infections developed in 72.5% and 76.5% of rACR and BOS groups. Rescue alemtuzumab appears useful for rACR. Patients with BOS 1 may have transient benefit, and patients with advanced BOS seem not to respond to alemtuzumab.

Posttransplant solid organ malignancies in lung transplant recipients: a single-center experience and review of the literature

PURPOSE

Solid-organ tumor incidences are higher in solid organ transplant patients than in the general population. The aim of this study was to analyze solid-organ tumor frequency and characteristics in a population of lung transplant patients and provide a brief review of the literature.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of all patients who underwent a lung transplant in the Lung Transplant Program at the University Hospital of Siena, Italy, from 2001 to 2014 (n = 119). Patients' demographics, pretransplant characteristics, immunosuppressive therapy, and infectious factors were recorded.

RESULTS

Nine patients with a median age of 59.0 years (range 50-63) of our cohort developed a solid-organ tumor (7.5%). Most of the patients experienced nonmelanoma skin cancer (44.4%); the others were diagnosed with lung cancer (22.2%), breast cancer (22.2%), and colon-rectal cancer (11.2%). The median time from transplantation to tumor diagnosis was 895.0 days (range 321-2046). No differences in pretransplant characteristics, immunosuppressive therapy, or infectious factors were found between patients who developed solid organ tumors and those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study confirmed that de novo malignancies are a major issue in lung transplant patients; in particular, skin and lung cancers demonstrated a higher incidence rate. Oncologic treatment of these patients is complex, requiring close collaboration between the transplant team and oncologist. Strict screening programs are key factors for an early diagnosis and to allow for prompt treatment resulting in a better outcome.

The Impact of Alemtuzumab and Basiliximab Induction on Patient Survival and Time to Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Double Lung Transplantation Recipients

We examined the effect of alemtuzumab and basiliximab induction therapy on patient survival and freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in double lung transplantation. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was reviewed for adult double lung transplant recipients from 2006 to 2013. The primary outcome was risk-adjusted all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included time to BOS. There were 6117 patients were identified, of whom 738 received alemtuzumab, 2804 received basiliximab, and 2575 received no induction. Alemtuzumab recipients had higher lung allocation scores compared with basiliximab and no-induction recipients (41.4 versus 37.9 versus 40.7, p < 0.001) and were more likely to require mechanical ventilation before to transplantation (21.7% versus 6.5% versus 6.2%, p < 0.001). Median survival was longer for alemtuzumab and basiliximab recipients compared with patients who received no induction (2321 versus 2352 versus 1967 days, p = 0.001). Alemtuzumab (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.95, p = 0.009) and basiliximab induction (0.88, 0.80-0.98, p = 0.015) were independently associated with survival on multivariate analysis. At 5 years, alemtuzumab recipients had a lower incidence of BOS (22.7% versus 55.4 versus 55.9%), and its use was independently associated with lower risk of developing BOS on multivariate analysis. While both induction therapies were associated with improved survival, patients who received alemtuzumab had greater median freedom from BOS.

Psychiatric Predictors of Long-term Transplant-Related Outcomes in Lung Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival after lung transplantation remains poor, yet modifiable risk factors for late-term morbidity and mortality have yet to be identified. Because psychiatric disorders increase risk for poor health outcomes in many nontransplant chronic disease populations, lung recipients with depression or anxiety before or early after transplantation may be at heightened risk for late-term transplant-related morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Among 178 patients from a prospective study of mental health after lung transplantation, we identified 1-year survivors and examined whether they experienced major depression or anxiety disorders during that year as well as before transplantation. We used multivariable Cox regression to examine the relationship between these disorders and risk for subsequent bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), mortality and graft loss for up to 15 years posttransplant, controlling for other known risk factors for the outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-five recipients were studied. Recipients with posttransplant depression had an elevated risk of BOS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.10-3.31), patient death (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.01-2.71) and graft loss (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.06-2.88). A trend toward reduced risk of BOS was observed in recipients with posttransplant anxiety (HR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.37-1.00). Neither pretransplant disorder was related to risk for any outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Early posttransplant depression increases risk for long-term transplant-related morbidity and mortality. Screening to identify depression should therefore be routine in posttransplant care. Although anxiety was not significantly associated with poor outcomes, screening for posttransplant anxiety should also be routine, to reduce patient distress. Research is needed to better understand mechanisms underlying depression-outcome associations.

Mathematical Modeling of Early Cellular Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses to Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and Solid Organ Allotransplantation

A mathematical model of the early inflammatory response in transplantation is formulated with ordinary differential equations. We first consider the inflammatory events associated only with the initial surgical procedure and the subsequent ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) events that cause tissue damage to the host as well as the donor graft. These events release damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs), thereby initiating an acute inflammatory response. In simulations of this model, resolution of inflammation depends on the severity of the tissue damage caused by these events and the patient's (co)-morbidities. We augment a portion of a previously published mathematical model of acute inflammation with the inflammatory effects of T cells in the absence of antigenic allograft mismatch (but with DAMP release proportional to the degree of graft damage prior to transplant). Finally, we include the antigenic mismatch of the graft, which leads to the stimulation of potent memory T cell responses, leading to further DAMP release from the graft and concomitant increase in allograft damage. Regulatory mechanisms are also included at the final stage. Our simulations suggest that surgical injury and I/R-induced graft damage can be well-tolerated by the recipient when each is present alone, but that their combination (along with antigenic mismatch) may lead to acute rejection, as seen clinically in a subset of patients. An emergent phenomenon from our simulations is that low-level DAMP release can tolerize the recipient to a mismatched allograft, whereas different restimulation regimens resulted in an exaggerated rejection response, in agreement with published studies. We suggest that mechanistic mathematical models might serve as an adjunct for patient- or sub-group-specific predictions, simulated clinical studies, and rational design of immunosuppression.

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction and risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in adult and pediatric solid organ transplantation: An update

The most modifiable risk factor for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is the type and dose of induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. It is challenging to identify the contribution of a single agent such as rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) in the setting of multidrug therapy. Registry analyses can be helpful but are limited by methodological restrictions and inclusion of historical patient cohorts. These are typically from eras when rATG dosing was markedly higher than current dosing (e.g. total dose 14 mg/kg versus 6 mg/kg now), accompanied by higher exposure to maintenance therapies, and often an absence of antiviral prophylaxis. The largest registry analysis to assess rATG specifically found no risk of PTLD after kidney transplantation, but conflicting results have been reported, highlighting the difficulty of interpreting this type of analysis. The relative rarity of PTLD means that individually controlled trials are underpowered to assess its occurrence, but the available data do not suggest an effect of rATG. A pooled analysis of data from studies of rATG induction in kidney and heart transplantation found the incidence of PTLD to be comparable to published reports in the overall transplant population. Data on the effect of rATG dose are inconclusive, but in patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis it does not appear to be influential. Nevertheless, it would seem reasonable to employ the lowest dose of rATG compatible with effective induction, particularly in EBV-seronegative recipients and other high-risk groups such as heart-lung transplant recipients. Overall, the risk of PTLD following rATG induction therapy with modern dosing regimens and under current management conditions appears unlikely to make an important contribution to the risk:benefit balance.

Future direction of immunosuppression in lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immunosuppression regimens have helped improve rejection episodes following lung transplantation, but long-term outcomes are still not comparable with cardiac, hepatic, or renal transplantation. This review summarizes the immunobiology that contributes to rejection events and future opportunities in outcomes on the basis of providing optimized delivery of the immunosuppression based on immune-monitoring techniques, taking into account individual patient pharmacokinetics and phenotypic variance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Drug toxicities, narrow therapeutic drug monitoring windows, and current immunoassays currently do not assist in detecting the global degree of immunosuppression. The currently available randomized control trials for induction therapy or maintenance therapies do not provide additional benefits compared with previously reported retrospective trials. To push beyond the current barriers, transplant teams are focusing on the role of pharmacokinetics, assessing phenotypic variable to potentially modify to quadruple therapy and using extracorporeal photopheresis.

SUMMARY

Conventional practice for the choices of immunosuppression is being evaluated on the basis of randomized control trials as opposed to retrospective studies or single-center trials. The future direction of immunosuppression will be continued by dynamic processes taking into consideration measures to improve tolerance, reducing treatment burden, and providing the best level of evidence while accounting for rejection, infections, renal function, and other comorbidities.

An international ISHLT/ATS/ERS clinical practice guideline: diagnosis and management of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a major complication of lung transplantation that is associated with poor survival. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society convened a committee of international experts to describe and/or provide recommendations for 1) the definition of BOS, 2) the risk factors for developing BOS, 3) the diagnosis of BOS, and 4) the management and prevention of BOS. A pragmatic evidence synthesis was performed to identify all unique citations related to BOS published from 1980 through to March, 2013. The expert committee discussed the available research evidence upon which the updated definition of BOS, identified risk factors and recommendations are based. The committee followed the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to develop specific clinical recommendations. The term BOS should be used to describe a delayed allograft dysfunction with persistent decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s that is not caused by other known and potentially reversible causes of post-transplant loss of lung function. The committee formulated specific recommendations about the use of systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azithromycin and about re-transplantation in patients with suspected and confirmed BOS. The diagnosis of BOS requires the careful exclusion of other post-transplant complications that can cause delayed lung allograft dysfunction, and several risk factors have been identified that have a significant association with the onset of BOS. Currently available therapies have not been proven to result in significant benefit in the prevention or treatment of BOS. Adequately designed and executed randomised controlled trials that properly measure and report all patient-important outcomes are needed to identify optimal therapies for established BOS and effective strategies for its prevention.

Update on Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation has become an important therapeutic option for patients with end-stage organ dysfunction; however, its clinical usefulness has been limited by the relatively early onset of chronic allograft dysfunction and progressive clinical decline. Obliterative bronchiolitis is characterized histologically by luminal fibrosis of the respiratory bronchioles and clinically by bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) which is defined by a measured decline in lung function based on forced expiratory volume (FEV₁). Since its earliest description, a number of risk factors have been associated with the development of BOS, including acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, primary graft dysfunction, infection, donor specific antibodies, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, despite this broadened understanding, the pathogenesis underlying BOS remains poorly understood and once begun, there are relatively few treatment options to battle the progressive deterioration in lung function.

Immunosuppression in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation can be a life-saving procedure for those with end-stage lung diseases. Unfortunately, long term graft and patient survival are limited by both acute and chronic allograft rejection, with a median survival of just over 6 years. Immunosuppressive regimens are employed to reduce the rate of rejection, and while protocols vary from center to center, conventional maintenance therapy consists of triple drug therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), antiproliferative agents [azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate, sirolimus (srl), everolimus (evl)], and corticosteroids (CS). Roughly 50% of lung transplant centers also utilize induction therapy, with polyclonal antibody preparations [equine or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)], interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2RAs) (daclizumab or basiliximab), or alemtuzumab. This review summarizes these agents and the data surrounding their use in lung transplantation, as well as additional common and novel therapies in lung transplantation. Despite the progression of the management of lung transplant recipients, they continue to be at high risk of treatment-related complications, and poor graft and patient survival. Randomized clinical trials are needed to allow for the development of better agents, regimens and techniques to address above mentioned issues and reduce morbidity and mortality among lung transplant recipients.

Alemtuzumab in lung transplantation: an open-label, randomized, prospective single center study

Induction therapy with alemtuzumab followed by lower maintenance immunosuppression (IS) has been associated with reduced morbidity and mortality in abdominal and heart transplantation (TX). In the current study, alemtuzumab, in combination with reduced levels of maintenance IS, was compared to thymoglobulin in combination with standard IS. Sixty consecutive patients who underwent lung transplantation (LUTX) at a single center were prospectively randomized in two groups: group A received alemtuzumab in conjunction with reduced doses of tacrolimus, steroids and mycophenolate mofetil. Group B received thymoglobulin in association with standard dose IS. Patient and graft survival, freedom from acute cellular rejection (ACR), lymphocytic bronchiolitis, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, kidney function, infectious complications and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder were analyzed. Alemtuzumab induction therapy resulted in complete the absence of ACR episodes ≥ A2 within the first year post-TX. The difference to thymoglobulin was significant (alemtuzumab 0 vs. ATG 0.33; p = 0.019). All other factors studied did not show any differences between the two groups. Alemtuzumab induction therapy after LUTX in combination with reduced maintenance IS significantly reduces higher-grade rejection rates. This novel therapeutic agent had no impact on survival, infections rates, kidney function and incidence of malignancies.

Immunosuppression and allograft rejection following lung transplantation: evidence to date

The enduring success of lung transplantation is built on the use of immunosuppressive drugs to stop the immune system from rejecting the newly transplanted lung allograft. Most patients receive a triple-drug maintenance immunosuppressive regimen consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative and corticosteroids. Induction therapy with either an antilymphocyte monoclonal or an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist are prescribed by many centres aiming to achieve rapid inhibition of recently activated and potentially alloreactive T lymphocytes. Despite this generic approach acute rejection episodes remain common, mandating further fine-tuning and augmentation of the immunosuppressive regimen. While there has been a trend away from cyclosporine and azathioprine towards a preference for tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, this has not translated into significant protection from the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, the main barrier to the long-term success of lung transplantation. This article reviews the problem of lung allograft rejection and the evidence for immunosuppressive regimens used both in the short- and long-term in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Elevated CXCL10 (IP-10) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is associated with acute cellular rejection after human lung transplantation. Transplantation. 2014;97:90-97. [PMID: 24025324 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3182a6ee0a]

BACKGROUND

CXCL10 (IP-10) is a potent chemoattractant for T cells that has been postulated to play a role in infection and acute cellular rejection (ACR) in animal models. We measured CXCL10 (IP-10) (and other cytokines previously implicated in the pathogenesis of ACR) in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of lung transplant recipients (LTRs) to determine the association between CXCL10 (IP-10) and ACR in LTRs.

METHODS

In a prospective study of 85 LTRs, expression of cytokines (tumor necrosis factor, interferon-γ, interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-15, IL-16, IL-17, CXCL10 [IP-10], and MCP-1 [CCL2]) in BAL samples (n=233) from patients with episodes of ACR (n=44), infection ("Infect"; n=25), concomitant "Infect+ACR" (n=10), and "No Infect and No ACR" (n=154) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The levels of both CXCL10 (IP-10) and IL-16 were significantly increased in histologically proven ACR compared with the "No Infect and No ACR" group (CXCL10 [IP-10]: 107.0 vs. 31.9 pg/mL [P=0.001] and IL-16: 472.1 vs. 283.01 pg/mL [P=0.01]). However, in a linear mixed-effects model, significant association was found only between CXCL10 (IP-10) and ACR. A one-log increase of CXCL10 (IP-10) was associated with a 40% higher risk of ACR (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.84).

CONCLUSION

Higher values of CXCL10 (IP-10) in BAL fluid are associated with ACR in LTRs, suggesting a potential mechanistic role in the pathogenesis of ACR in LTRs. These results suggest that therapeutic strategies to inhibit CXCL10 (IP-10) and or its cognate receptor, CXCR3, warrant investigation to prevent and/or treat ACR in clinical lung transplantation.

Long-Term Outcomes following Alemtuzumab Induction in Lung Transplantation

Objectives: Alemtuzumab is a commonly used induction agent for solid-organ transplantation. Its use in lung transplantation with reduced immunosuppressive regimens, however, has yet to be well characterized.Methods: From November 2006 to March 2008, 20 consecutive lung transplantation patients received alemtuzumab induction with a reduced maintenance immunosuppression regimen. Twenty consecutive case-controls who underwent transplantation between 2005 and 2006 were treated with a standard immunosuppression regimen without induction. Outcome variables were patient survival, acute rejection, infection, and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.Results: Mean follow-up time was 1400 days in the alemtuzumab group and 1210 days in the control group. Double lung transplantation was performed in 21 patients (12 in the alemtuzumab group and 9 in the control group). There was no difference in survival between the alemtuzumab (n = 10) and control (n = 10) groups. There was also not a significant difference in time-adjusted death based on Kaplan-Meier analysis. The mean number of any grade of rejection event per patient was not significantly different (alemtuzumab 2.3 ± 2.7 vs. control 3.2 ± 2.35; P = .22). There was a trend toward the reduced incidence of infection requiring intravenous antibiotics per patient (alemtuzumab 2.4 vs. control 3.8; P = .08). The incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome was similar in both groups (alemtuzumab 55% vs. control 70%; P = .25).Conclusions: Alemtuzumab induction with reduced immunosuppression offers a comparable 5-year survival and rejection rate compared to standard-dose immunosuppression regimen.

Lung transplant infection

Lung transplantation has become an accepted therapeutic procedure for the treatment of end‐stage pulmonary parenchymal and vascular disease. Despite improved survival rates over the decades, lung transplant recipients have lower survival rates than other solid organ transplant recipients. The morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation is largely due to infection‐ and rejection‐related complications. This article will review the common infections that develop in the lung transplant recipient, including the general risk factors for infection in this population, and the most frequent bacterial, viral, fungal and other less frequent opportunistic infections. The epidemiology, diagnosis, prophylaxis, treatment and outcomes for the different microbial pathogens will be reviewed. The effects of infection on lung transplant rejection will also be discussed.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: the Achilles' heel of lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage pulmonary disorders. Unfortunately, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), most commonly manifest as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), continues to be highly prevalent and is the major limitation to long-term survival. The pathogenesis of BOS is complex and involves alloimmune and nonalloimmune pathways. Clinically, BOS manifests as airway obstruction and dyspnea that are classically progressive and ultimately fatal; however, the course is highly variable, and distinguishable phenotypes may exist. There are few controlled studies assessing treatment efficacy, but only a minority of patients respond to current treatment modalities. Ultimately, preventive strategies may prove more effective at prolonging survival after lung transplantation, but their remains considerable debate and little data regarding the best strategies to prevent BOS. A better understanding of the risk factors and their relationship to the pathological mechanisms of chronic lung allograft rejection should lead to better pharmacological targets to prevent or treat this syndrome.