Intestine transplantation in the United States, 1999-2008

Updates in induction immunosuppression regimens for intestinal transplantation

Intestinal allografts are the most immunologically complex and carry the highest risk of rejection among solid organ transplantation, necessitating complex immunosuppressive management. We evaluated the latest information regarding induction immunosuppression, with an emphasis on established, novel, and emergent therapies. We also reviewed classic and novel induction immunosuppression strategies for highly sensitized recipients. Comparable progress has been made in intestinal transplantation clinical outcomes since the implementation of induction strategies. This review shows a clear diversity of induction protocols can be observed across different centers. The field of intestinal transplantation is still in its early stages, which is further complicated by the limited number of institutions capable of intestinal transplantation and their geographical variation, which further hinders the development of adequately powered studies in comparison to other organs. As the implementation of institution-specific induction protocols becomes more refined and results are disseminated, future research efforts should be directed towards the development of efficacious induction strategies.

Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: Indications and Surgical Techniques

Intestinal transplantation and multivisceral transplantation are technically challenging and complex procedures mainly performed on patients with irreversible and non-medically manageable end-stage intestinal failure. Increasingly, other organs besides small intestines are included in the allograft for which the terms "composite intestinal transplantation" and "multivisceral transplantation" are used. Commonly, complex vascular reconstructions are used for these procedures. Knowledge of surgical anatomy hence is essential for accurate interpretation of postoperative imaging in these patients. This article reviews the indications and most common surgical techniques for intestinal and multivisceral transplantations.

Intestinal Donation and Utilization: Single-Center Analysis Within Eurotransplant

Intestinal donor criteria are classically kept strict, thereby limiting donor supply. Indications for intestinal transplantation (ITx) are rare, but improved outcome and new emerging indications lead to increased demand and relaxing donor criteria should be considered. We sought to compare the donor criteria of intestines transplanted at our center with predefined (per protocol) criteria, and to determine how relaxing donor criteria could impact the potential donor pool. Donor criteria used in 22 consecutive ITx at our center between 2000 and 2020 were compared with predefined criteria. Next, multiorgan donors effectively offered by our Donor Network to Eurotransplant between 2014 and 2020 were retrospectively screened, according to predefined and effectively used intestinal donation criteria. Finally, utilization rate of offered intestines was calculated. In our ITx series, the effectively used donor criteria were less strict than those initially predefined. With these relaxed criteria, a favorable 5-year graft/patient survival of 75% and 95%, respectively was reached. Applying these relaxed criteria would lead to a 127% increase in intestinal offers. Paradoxically, 70% of offered intestines were not used. In conclusion, a significant increase in intestinal donation could be obtained by relaxing donor criteria, while still achieving excellent outcome. Offered intestines are underutilized.

Beyond donation to organ utilization in the USA

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The deceased donor organ pool has broadened beyond young, otherwise healthy head trauma victims. But an abundance of donated organs only benefits patients if they are accepted, expeditiously transported and actually transplanted. This review focuses on postdonation challenges and opportunities to increase the number of transplants through improved organ utilization.

RECENT FINDINGS

We build upon recently proposed changes in terminology for measuring organ utilization. Among organs recovered for transplant, the nonuse rate (NUR REC ) has risen above 25% for kidneys and pancreata. Among donors, the nonuse rate (NUR DON ) has risen to 40% for livers and exceeds 70% for thoracic organs. Programme-level variation in offer acceptance rates vastly exceeds variation in the traditional, 1-year survival benchmark. Key opportunities to boost utilization include donation after circulatory death and hepatitis C virus (HCV)+ organs; acute kidney injury and suboptimal biopsy kidneys; older and steatotic livers.

SUMMARY

Underutilization of less-than-ideal, yet transplant-worthy organs remains an obstacle to maximizing the impact of the U.S. transplant system. The increased risk of inferior posttransplant outcomes must always be weighed against the risks of remaining on the waitlist. Advanced perfusion technologies; tuning allocation systems for placement efficiency; and data-driven clinical decision support have the potential to increase utilization of medically complex organs.

Deceased donor organ allocation in pediatric transplantation: A historical narrative

BACKGROUND

Since the earliest clinical successes in solid organ transplantation, the proper method of organ allocation for children has been a contentious subject. Over the past 30-35 years, the medical and social establishments of various countries have favored some degree of preference for children on the respective waiting lists. However, the specific policies to accomplish this have varied widely and changed frequently between organ type and country.

METHODS

Organ allocation policies over time were examined. This review traces the reasons behind and the measures/principles put in place to promote early deceased donor transplantation in children.

RESULTS

Preferred allocation in children has been approached in a variety of ways and with varying degrees of commitment in different solid organ transplant disciplines and national medical systems.

CONCLUSION

The success of policies to advantage children has varied significantly by both organ and medical system. Further work is needed to optimize allocation strategies for pediatric candidates.

Long-term outcomes of intestinal transplantation from donors aged under 1 year

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of transplants utilizing ITx donors <1 year and to compare these results with older donors.

METHODS

Between January 2007 and December 2019, the primary ITx donors in the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC were retrospectively reviewed. Short- and long-term outcomes of recipients receiving a deceased donor organ from donors <1 year were compared with those found in all other recipients.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 89 primary ITx donors, using 30 donors (33.7%) aged <1 year. The mean age of their recipients was 1.6 ± 0.7 (0.7-3.2) years. The 30 graft types were isolated intestine (n = 3, 10.0%), liver bowel (n = 20, 66.7%), and multivisceral (n = 7, 23.3%). Technical complications occurred in 12 (40.0%) recipients. Candidates transplanted with intestine allografts from donors <1 year of age had shorter wait times (p < .001), more liver-inclusive grafts (p < .001), and less donor-specific antibodies (DSA) (p = .014). During follow-up, the recipients had less graft loss (p = .018), and more remained alive with graft in place (p = .011). Among children transplanted with such donors, 3-year and graft survival rates were 86.7% and 82.9% compared to 62.8% and 49.9% in the cohort of donors >1 year (p = .032 and .011).

CONCLUSIONS

Donor age <1 year was associated with improved graft survival. Optimal utilization of this population for toddler candidates would increase intestine availability, reduce time to transplantation, and potentially improve long-term outcome.

Potential options to expand the intestinal donor pool: a comprehensive review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intestinal donation is currently restricted to 'perfect' donors, as the intestine is extremely vulnerable to ischemia. With generally deteriorating donor quality and increasing indications for intestinal transplantation (ITx), the potential to safely increase the donor pool should be evaluated.

RECENT FINDINGS

Increasing awareness on intestinal donation (often forgotten) and cautiously broadening the strict donor criteria (increasing age, resuscitation time and ICU stay) could expand the potential donor pool. Donors after circulatory death (DCD) have so far not been considered for ITx, due to the particularly detrimental effect of warm ischemia on the intestine. However, normothermic regional perfusion might be a well tolerated strategy to render the use of DCD intestinal grafts feasible. Furthermore, machine perfusion is under continuous development and might improve preservation of the intestine and potentially offer a platform to modulate the intestinal graft. Lastly, living donation currently represents only a minority of all ITxs performed worldwide. Various studies and registry analysis show that it can be performed safely for the donor and successfully in the recipient.

SUMMARY

Several potential strategies are available to expand the current intestinal donor pool. Most of them require further investigation or technical developments before they can be implemented in the clinical routine.

Proteomic biomarkers in short bowel syndrome : are we ready to use them in clinical activity?

Introduction: Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a clinical condition that can affect childhood and adult patients. Biomarker research is expected to be a new frontier in the clinical application, helpful for patients and health-care systems.Areas covered: SBS is usually a consequence of a massive intestinal resection that leads to an intestinal failure because of the reduction of absorptive surface, bacterial overgrowth, and faster intestinal transit. This new condition requires a multidisciplinary expertise to achieve again digestive autonomy. Parental nutrition (PN) supports nutritional status in SBS patients while the new guidelines on intestinal transplantation confirm its strict indication only for patients at actual risk of death on PN. A PubMed literature review from the 1980s up to date was performed, highlighting proteomic biomarkers and growth factor therapies that have shown so far promising results in SBS patients.Expert opinion: Apart from a few specific biomarkers and growth factors, the discovery of specific molecular events is currently under investigation of the proteomic analysis and could potentially represent fundamental, future changes in prevention, diagnosis, therapeutic management, and experimental practices in SBS.

Current status of pediatric intestinal transplantation in the United States

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review aims to describe in detail the characteristics, outcomes, and recent trends in the field of pediatric intestinal transplantation in the United States. It will examine the route cause and future implications of these developments. The review will draw from recent publications in the field, the Intestinal Transplant Registry, and contemporary data from large U.S. single centers.

RECENT FINDINGS

More than 1500 pediatric intestinal transplants have been performed in the United States since 1985, however, over the past decade there have been fewer than 50 transplants/year nationwide. This trend is largely a result of stagnant long-term ITx outcomes and advancements in intestinal rehabilitation programs. Nationally the overall 1-year and 5-year graft survival are 68 and 50% respectively, whereas certain high-volume centers have experienced significantly better results. Sepsis is the leading cause of death following pediatric ITx, whereas rejection is the leading cause of graft loss. Chronic kidney disease and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder are significant and relatively prevalent long-term complications. The majority of pediatric ITx recipients receive T-cell depleting induction agents and are on Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Most recipient are off parenteral nutrition, but may require supplemental tube feeds. Many pediatric ITx recipients require special education, and in certain domains some report lower health related quality of life.

SUMMARY

As intestinal rehabilitation has improved in the modern era, the volume of pediatric ITx in the United States has decreased. Although pediatric ITx results have room for improvement nationwide, successful outcomes have been reported at experienced American centers.

Pediatric intestinal transplantation: Analysis of the intestinal transplant registry

The ITR serves as an international database for centers around the world to contribute to current knowledge about intestinal transplant outcomes. Led by the IRTA and managed by the Terasaki Research Institute, the ITR collects data annually and uses these data to generate reports that guide management strategies and policy statements. The aim of this manuscript was to analyze outcomes specific to pediatric intestinal transplantation. Outcome data for children transplanted from 1985 to 2017 were analyzed and predictive factors assessed. A total of 2010 children received 2080 intestine containing allografts during this period. Overall, 1-year and 5-year patient and graft survival were 72.7%/66.1% and 57.2/48.8%, respectively. One-year conditional survival was most strongly associated with being a first-time transplant recipient and liver-inclusive grafts. Patient survival was most strongly associated with elective status of transplantation as compared with hospitalized status. Enteral autonomy following transplantation has continued to improve by era with colonic inclusion demonstrating additional incremental improvement in enteral autonomy and freedom from intravenous fluid. While PTLD and technical complications contribute less to graft loss than in earlier eras, rejection remains the largest contributor to long-term graft loss. Re-transplantation is linked with significantly worse conditional graft survival, and sepsis remains the largest contributor to patient death. Newer data elements are focusing on impact of donor variables, donor and recipient tissue typing, and impact of the development of de novo antibodies.

Impact of Donor Age on Outcome of Intestinal Transplantation in Japan

BACKGROUND

Donor age for intestinal transplantation (ITx) is somewhat younger than that for other solid organs. Clear criteria for adequate donors have not been established. There is a donor scarcity for ITx in Japan due to the shortage of young donors.

METHODS

We reviewed outcomes associated with ITx in Japan based on donor age for cadaveric and living donation.

RESULTS

Standardized report forms were sent to all known ITx programs, asking for information on ITxs performed between 1996 and 2016. All programs responded. Patient and graft survival estimates were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method. Five institutions provided data on 27 grafts in 24 patients. There were 14 cadaveric and 13 living donor transplants. Median donor age for ITxs was 40 (range, 17-60) years. Graft survival at 5 years was 66% for patients >40 years old (n = 18) and 47% for those <40 years old (n = 9), not a statistically significant difference (P = .49). Graft survival at 5 years was 60% in those >50 years old (n = 5) and 57% for those <50 years old (n = 22), again not a significant difference (P = .27).

CONCLUSION

There is no difference in survival between for those with donor age <40 vs >40 years. Donor age for ITx can be extended from >40 to up to 50 years, which may help to mitigate the donor shortage. It will be necessary to clarify the donor criteria for ITx through accumulation of further data on ITx.

Outcomes of Adult Intestinal Transplant Recipients Requiring Dialysis and Renal Transplantation

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background

Data on dialysis and renal transplantation (RT) after intestinal transplantation (IT) are sparse. Whether changes in immunosuppression and surgical techniques have modified these outcomes is unknown.

Methods

Two hundred eighty-eight adult intestinal transplants performed between 1990 and 2014 at the University of Pittsburgh were analyzed for incidence, risk factors and outcomes after dialysis and RT. Cohort was divided into 3 eras based on immunosuppression and surgical technique (1990-1994, 1995-2001, and 2001-2014). Receiving RT, or dialysis for 90 days or longer was considered as end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Results

During a median follow-up of 5.7 years, 71 (24.7%) patients required dialysis, 38 (13.2%) required long-term dialysis and 17 (6%) received RT after IT. One-, 3-, and 5-year ESRD risk was 2%, 7%, and 14%, respectively. No significant era-based differences were noted. Higher baseline creatinine (hazard ratio [HR], 3.40 per unit increase, P < 0.01) and use of liver containing grafts (HR, 2.01; P = 0.04) had an increased ESRD risk. Median patient survival after dialysis initiation was 6 months, with a 3-year survival of 21%. Any dialysis (HR, 12.74; 95% CI 8.46-19.20; P < 0.01) and ESRD (HR, 9.53; 95% CI, 5.87-15.49; P < 0.01) had higher mortality after adjusting for covariates. For renal after IT, 1- and 3-year kidney and patient survivals were 70% and 49%, respectively. All graft losses were from death with a functioning graft, primarily related to infectious complications (55%).

Conclusions

In intestinal transplant recipients, renal failure requiring dialysis or RT is high and is associated with increased mortality. Additionally, the outcomes for kidney after IT are suboptimal due to death with a functioning graft.

Distal Bowel Re-feeding in Patients with Proximal Jejunostomy

BACKGROUND

Patients who have a proximal jejunostomy are difficult to manage because of their high stoma output which results in fluid and electrolyte imbalance with repeated hospital admissions and the necessity for expensive parenteral nutrition (PN). There are few reports on the use of re-feeding of the proximal effluents in this situation.

METHODS

We here relate our experience with this manoeuvre in 35 patients between Jan 2010 and Feb 2016 who had stomas less than 120 cm away from the duodenojejunal flexure.

RESULTS

There were 26 males and 9 females, whose median age was 47 (19-74) years. The most common indications for massive bowel resection were gangrene in 25 (71%) and intestinal perforation in 7 (20%). The median proximal and distal small bowel lengths were 45 (15-120) cm and 90 (0-240) cm respectively. The ileocaecal (IC) valve was preserved in 33 (94%) and there was only colon distally (without the ileocaecal valve) in 2 (6%) patients. Twenty-five (71%) patients required post-operative ICU care. Additional PN was required in 6 (17%) patients during their index admission with the average extra cost of treatment being 20,000 rupees. Their median hospital stay was 13 (6-60) days. Patients were discharged without intravenous (IV) lines. Eight (26%) patients required re-admission for acute renal failure which was managed conservatively. No major problems were associated with re-feeding. None of the patients required PN after discharge from hospital. Thirty (86%) patients had their stomas closed at 65 (14-224) days. Both the patients with colon only as their distal bowel remnant died. Sepsis was the cause of mortality in 4 (11%) during index admission and 3 after their discharge. On follow-up after bowel re-connection, 2 patients died after 1 and 12 months, both due to intracranial bleeding, and the overall survival was 74%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with proximal jejunostomies can be managed with distal re-feeding. It is a cost-effective and effective substitute for PN, is associated with few problems, and has a fairly good long-term outcome.

Pediatric Intestinal Transplantation

Pediatric intestinal transplantation has moved from the theoretic to an actual therapy for children with irreversible intestinal failure who are suffering from complications of total parenteral nutrition. Owing to significant advancement in the management of intestinal failure and prevention of parenteral nutrition-related complications that have led to reduction in incidence of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease and have improved intestinal adaptation, the indications for intestinal transplantation are evolving. Long-term outcomes have improved, but challenges in long-term graft function owing to chronic rejection and immunosuppressant-related complications remain the major opportunities for improvement.

Liver-inclusive intestinal transplantation results in decreased alloimmune-mediated rejection but increased infection

Background and aims

A co-transplanted liver allograft has been thought to protect other organs from rejection-mediated injury; however, detailed analyses of co-transplanted liver on intestinal allograft outcomes have not been conducted to date. The aim of the study was to compare immune-mediated injury, causes of graft failure and clinical outcomes between recipients who underwent either a liver-inclusive intestinal transplant (LITx) or liver-exclusive intestinal transplant (LETx).

Methods

Between May 2000 and May 2010, 212 adult patients undergoing LITx (n =76) and LETx (n =136) were included. LITx underwent either liver combined intestinal or full multivisceral transplantation. LETx underwent either isolated intestinal or modified multivisceral transplantation.

Results

During 44.9 ± 31.4 months of follow-up, death-censored intestinal graft survival was significantly higher for LITx than LETx (96.9%, 93.2% and 89.9% vs 91.4%, 69.3% and 60.0% at 1, 3 and 5 years; p =0.0001). Incidence of graft loss due to rejection was higher in LETx than in LITx (30.9% vs 6.6%; p <0.0001), while infection was the leading cause of graft loss due to patient death in LITx (25.0% vs 5.1%; p <0.0001). Despite similar immunosuppression, the average number (0.87 vs 1.42, p =0.02) and severity of acute cellular rejection episode (severe grade: 7.9% vs 21.3%; p =0.01) were lower in LITx than in LETx. Incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection was also significantly lower in LITx than in LETx (3.6% vs 15.2%; p =0.03). Incidence of chronic rejection was reduced in LITx (3.9% vs 24.3%; p =0.0002).

Conclusions

Intestinal allografts with a liver component appear to decrease risk of rejection but increase risk of infection. Our findings emphasize that LITx has characteristic immunologic and clinical features. Lower immunosuppression may need to be considered for patients who undergo LITx to attenuate increased risk of infection.

Short Bowel Syndrome: An Uncommon Clinical Entity and a Therapeutic Challenge-Our Experience and Review of Literature

Short bowel syndrome (SBS), one of the commonest types of intestinal failure, usually secondary to extensive bowel resection, traditionally has been associated with a high mortality rate and hence a big challenge for the treating surgeons. It requires comprehensive clinical care to minimise the morbidities and mortality associated with the condition. We report a retrospective review of a series of seven patients with SBS, who presented at our surgical emergency within a period of 1 year and their outcome so as to encourage others in managing such a challenge with more positive mindsets. A retrospective analysis of seven patients with SBS admitted from January 2014 to January 2015 with a follow-up of 1 year has been done in terms of their demographic characteristics, underlying pathology and clinical outcome. A rising incidence of SBS in the younger age group (71.4%) has been observed in this analysis. Majority of patients (57.1%) had mesenteric ischemia as the underlying cause followed by each case of small bowel volvulus, internal herniation and blunt trauma abdomen. A discharge rate of 71.4% and mortality rate of 28.5% were observed. With this analysis, we believe that SBS is no more an uncommon condition. A structured clinical approach, timely surgical intervention and multidisciplinary postoperative management are essential for managing such frail patients to achieve best possible results. This will encourage others in managing such a critically challenged condition with a more positive approach and thus beneficial for both the patients and the treating surgeon.

Anesthesia for Intestinal Transplantation

The diagnosis of irreversible intestinal failure confers significant morbidity, mortality, and decreased quality of life. Patients with irreversible intestinal failure may be treated with intestinal transplantation. Intestinal transplantation may include intestine only, liver-intestine, or other visceral elements. Intestinal transplantation candidates present with systemic manifestations of intestinal failure requiring multidisciplinary evaluation at an intestinal transplantation center. Central access may be difficult in intestinal transplantation candidates. Intestinal transplantation is a complex operation with potential for hemodynamic and metabolic instability. Patient and graft survival are improving, but graft failure remains the most common postoperative complication.

Intestine Transplantation Across a Positive Crossmatch With Preformed Donor-Specific Antibodies

BACKGROUND

We describe our experience using a modified protocol for immunosuppression for intestine transplantation across a positive crossmatch. Patients who underwent transplantation in 2013 were evaluated over a 12-month period for rejection and infectious events with comparison to procedure-matched controls on our standard protocol of immunosuppression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used a modified protocol for intestine and multivisceral transplantation for patients with a positive flow crossmatch. In addition to our standard protocol, patients with positive crossmatch were given rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) preoperatively. DSA was sent for clinical evaluation at monthly intervals. Patients were screened for rejection by endoscopic evaluation.

RESULTS

Four patients underwent transplantation within a single year across a positive crossmatch. Two received isolated intestine transplants and 2 had multivisceral transplantation (MVT). During the 12-month follow-up, 1 patients had an episode of severe acute cellular rejection, which was managed with increased immunosuppression. None of the patients had episodes of cytomegalovirus infection. One patient developed major infection and 3 patients developed minor bacterial infections. Among procedure-matched controls with negative final crossmatch on standard management (no preoperative rituximab or IVIg), 2 developed mild acute cellular rejection and 2 developed minor infections. One developed cytomegalovirus viremia with invasion to the colonic mucosa.

CONCLUSIONS

We report our protocol for immunosuppression for IT and MVT across a positive crossmatch. This allowed transplantation despite the presence of a positive crossmatch, with low rejection rates but potentially increased risk for major infections compared to the negative crossmatch controls on our standard protocol.

Long-Term Outcomes of Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation at a Single Center in Argentina

BACKGROUND

Intestinal failure (IF) patients received parenteral nutrition (PN) as the only available therapy until intestinal transplantation (ITx) evolved as an accepted treatment. The aim of this article is to report the long-term outcomes of a series of ITx performed in pediatric and adult patients at a single center 9 years after its creation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of the ITx performed between May 2006 and January 2015. Diagnoses, pre-ITx mean time on PN, indications for ITx, time on the waiting list for types of ITx, mean total ischemia time, and warm ischemia time, time until PN discontinuation, incidence of acute and chronic rejection, and 5-year actuarial patient survival are reported.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients received ITx; 80% had short gut syndrome (SG); the mean time on PN was 1620 days. The main indication for ITx was lack of central venous access followed by intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD) and catheter-related infectious complications. The mean time on the waiting list was 188 days (standard deviation, ±183 days). ITx were performed in 26 children and 14 adults. In all, 32 procedures were isolated ITx (IITX); 10 were multiorgan Tx (MOT; 3 combined, 7 multivisceral Tx (MVTx), 1 modified MVTx and 2 with kidney); 2 (4.7 %) were retransplantations: 1 IITx, 1 MVTx, and 5 including the right colon. Thirteen patients (31%) received abdominal rectus fascia. All procedures were performed by the same surgical team. Total ischemia time was 7:53 ± 2:04 hours, and warm ischemia time was 40.2 ± 10.5 minutes. The mean length of implanted intestine was 325 ± 63 cm. Bishop-Koop ileostomy was performed in 67% of cases. In all, 16 of 42 Tx required early reoperations. The overall mean follow-up time was 41 ± 35.6 months. The mean time to PN discontinuation after Tx was 68 days (P = .001). The total number of acute cellular rejection (ACR) episodes until the last follow-up was 83; the total number of grafts lost due to ACR was 4; and the total graft lost due to chronic rejection was 3. At the time of writing, the overall 5-year patient survival is 55% (65% for IITx vs 22% for MOT; P = .0001); 60% for pediatric recipients vs 47% for adults (P = NS); 64% when the indication for ITx was SG vs 25% for non-SG (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

At this center, candidates with SG, in the absence of IFALD requiring IITx, showed the best long-term outcomes, independent of recipient age. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory for the care of intestinal failure patients, to sustain a rehabilitation and transplantation program over time.

Choice of Allograft in Patients Requiring Intestinal Transplantation: A Critical Review

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) is indicated in patients with irreversible intestinal failure (IF) and life-threatening complications related to total parenteral nutrition (TPN). ITx can be classified into three main types. Isolated intestinal transplantation (IITx), that is, transplantation of the jejunoileum, is indicated in patients with preserved liver function. Combined liver-intestine transplantation (L-ITx), that is, transplantation of the liver and the jejunoileum, is indicated in patients with liver failure related to TPN. Thus, patients with cirrhosis or advanced fibrosis should receive a combined allograft, while patients with lower grades of liver fibrosis can usually safely undergo ITx. Reflecting their degree of sickness, the waitlist mortality rate and the early posttransplant outcomes of patients receiving L-ITx are worse than IITx. However, L-ITx is associated with better long-term graft and patient survival. Multivisceral transplantation (MVTx), that is, transplantation of the organs dependent on the celiac axis and superior mesenteric artery, can be classified into full MVTx if it includes the liver and modified MVTx if it does not. The most common indications for MVTx are extensive portomesenteric thrombosis and diffuse gastrointestinal pathology such as motility disorders and polyposis syndrome. Every patient with IF should undergo a multidisciplinary evaluation by an experienced ITx team.

Intestinal transplantation in children: current status

Intestinal transplantation (IT) is the least common form of organ transplantation; however, it has shown exceptional growth and improvement in graft survival rates over the past two decades mainly due to better outcomes achieved during the first year of transplantation (76 % at 1 year), due to improvement in surgical techniques and the development of better immunosupressive therapies as we understand more about the relationship between the recipient and host immune system. There are still ongoing issues with chronic rejection and long-term survival. Intestinal transplantation is still an acceptable therapy for patients with intestinal failure (IF), but it is generally reserved for patients who develop severe and life-threatening complications despite standard therapies, or those who are not able to maintain a good quality of life. The purpose of this review is to describe the current status, indications, outcomes and advances in the field of intestinal transplantation.

Intestinal transplantation: The anesthesia perspective

Intestinal transplantation is a complex and challenging surgery. It is very effective for treating intestinal failure, especially for those patients who cannot tolerate parenteral nutrition nor have extensive abdominal disease. Chronic parental nutrition can induce intestinal failure associated liver disease (IFALD). According to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data, children with intestinal failure affected by liver disease secondary to parenteral nutrition have the highest mortality on a waiting list when compared with all candidates for solid organ transplantation. Intestinal transplant grafts can be isolated or combined with the liver/duodenum/pancreas. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) has defined intestinal donor criteria. Living donor intestinal transplant (LDIT) has the advantages of optimal timing, short ischemia time and good human leukocyte antigen matching contributing to lower postoperative complications in the recipient. Thoracic epidurals provide excellent analgesia for the donors, as well as recipients. Recipient management can be challenging. Thrombosis and obstruction of venous access maybe common due to prolonged parenteral nutrition and/or hypercoaguability. Thromboelastography (TEG) is helpful for managing intraoperative product therapy or thrombosis. Large fluid shifts and electrolyte disturbances may occur due to massive blood loss, dehydration, third spacing etc. Intestinal grafts are susceptible to warm and cold ischemia and ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Post-reperfusion syndrome is common. Cardiac or pulmonary clots can be monitored with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. Vasopressors maybe used to ensure stable hemodynamics. Post-intestinal transplant patients may need anesthesia for procedures such as biopsies for surveillance of rejection, bronchoscopy, endoscopy, postoperative hemorrhage, anastomotic leaks, thrombosis of grafts etc. Asepsis, drug interactions between anesthetic and immunosuppressive agents and venous access are some of the anesthetic considerations for this group.

Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

Intestinal transplantation has shown exceptional growth over the past 10 years. At the end of the 1990’s, intestinal transplantation moved out of the experimental realm to become a routine practice in treating patients with severe complications related to total parenteral nutrition and intestinal failure. In the last years, several centers reported an increasing improvement in survival outcomes (about 80%), during the first 12 months after surgery, but long-term survival is still a challenge. Several advances led to clinical application of transplants. Immunosuppression involved in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation was the biggest gain for this procedure in the past decade due to tacrolimus, and new inducing drugs, mono- and polyclonal anti-lymphocyte antibodies. Despite the advancement of rigid immunosuppression protocols, rejection is still very frequent in the first 12 months, and can result in long-term graft loss. The future of intestinal transplantation and multivisceral transplantation appears promising. The major challenge is early recognition of acute rejection in order to prevent graft loss, opportunistic infections associated to complications, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease and graft versus host disease; and consequently, improve results in the long run.

Renal failure associated with intestinal transplantation: our experience in Spain

BACKGROUND

Renal failure (RF) is a frequent complication in non-renal solid organ transplants. In the present study, we analyze our experience with intestinal transplants (ITx).

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2012, we performed 21 ITx in 19 adult patients. Alemtuzumab was used as an induction agent followed by tacrolimus. Renal function was assessed before ITx and during the perioperative period.

RESULTS

The main cause for transplants was non-resectable desmoids tumors (33.3%), followed by vascular thrombosis (19%) and others. Medical complications were frequent, especially infectious diseases, which were the most common (51%). Surgical complications were also frequent, but most of them (>50%) were mild but leading to a great number of re-operations and prolonged stays in hospital. Acute rejection is very frequent (66.6%) but mild in more than 70% of the cases. Finally, RF was very frequent (68.4%; 13/19 patients) and accounted for 15.6% of all medical complications. Causes were multiple. One patient is awaiting a kidney transplant, but no other patients need renal replacement therapy at the moment. Ileostomy closure was performed in 5 of 12 patients alive, showing improved renal function in 3 of them.

CONCLUSIONS

RF is a problem in ITx and is always multifactorial. Increases in hospital stay, higher morbidity and is a cause for hospital readmission. Almost all patients had an impaired renal function when discharged. Immunosuppressants and ileostomy closure as soon as possible might prevent RF.

Luminal injection of hydrogen-rich solution attenuates intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats

BACKGROUND

Luminal preservation of the intestine is an attractive method to locally mitigate preservation injury and ischemic-reperfusion injury in small bowel transplantation (SBT) because this method has a potential to maintain the intestinal graft integrity. Hydrogen is noted as an antioxidant material by reducing hydroxyl radicals. We hypothesized that hydrogen-containing solution can be an optimum material for luminal preservation method in SBT.

METHODS

Ischemic reperfusion was induced in Lewis rats by occlusion of the supramesenteric artery and vein for 90 min. Experimental protocols were divided into four groups: sham operation group, no luminal injection (control) group, luminal injection of 5% glucose saline (GS) solution group, and luminal injection of hydrogen-rich GS (HRGS) group. Two milliliters of experimental solution was locally injected into the lumen of the intestine before declamping of vessels. Oxidative stress markers, proinflammatory cytokines, apoptosis in the crypt cells, and morphologic changes of the intestine were assessed.

RESULTS

The production of malondialdehyde and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, as oxidative stress markers, were markedly suppressed in HRGS group. The level of proinflammatory cytokines, such as inducible nitric oxide synthase and interleukin-6, was significantly inhibited in HRGS group. Crypt apoptosis was also significantly suppressed in HRGS group. Histopathologically, integrity of villus in intestine was maintained in HRGS group in comparison to the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Luminal injection of hydrogen-rich solution can reduce oxidative stress and consequently ameliorate ischemic-reperfusion injury. Hydrogen-containing solution can be a novel and promising luminal preservation material in SBT.

The concept of gut rehabilitation and the future of visceral transplantation

In the 1990s, the introduction of visceral transplantation fuelled interest in other innovative therapeutic modalities for gut rehabilitation. Ethanol lock and omega-3 lipid formulations were introduced to reduce the risks associated with total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Autologous surgical reconstruction and bowel lengthening have been increasingly utilized for patients with complex abdominal pathology and short-bowel syndrome. Glucagon-like peptide 2 analogue, along with growth hormone, are available to enhance gut adaptation and achieve nutritional autonomy. Intestinal transplantation continues to be limited to a rescue therapy for patients with TPN failure. Nonetheless, survival outcomes have substantially improved with advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppressive strategies and postoperative management. Furthermore, both nutritional autonomy and quality of life can be restored for more than two decades in most survivors, with social support and inclusion of the liver being favourable predictors of long-term outcome. One of the current challenges is the discovery of biomarkers to diagnose early rejection and further improve liver-free allograft survival. Currently, chronic rejection with persistence of preformed and development of de novo donor-specific antibodies is a major barrier to long-term graft function; this issue might be overcome with innovative immunological and tolerogenic strategies. This Review discusses advances in the field of gut rehabilitation, including intestinal transplantation, and highlights future challenges. With the growing interest in individualized medicine and the value of health care, a novel management algorithm is proposed to optimize patient care through an integrated multidisciplinary team approach.

Intestinal transplant registry report: global activity and trends

The Registry has gathered information on intestine transplantation (IT) since 1985. During this time, individual centers have reported progress but small case volumes potentially limit the generalizability of this information. The present study was undertaken to examine recent global IT activity. Activity was assessed with descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and a multiple variable analysis. Eighty-two programs reported 2887 transplants in 2699 patients. Regional practices and outcomes are now similar worldwide. Current actuarial patient survival rates are 76%, 56% and 43% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Rates of graft loss beyond 1 year have not improved. Grafts that included a colon segment had better function. Waiting at home for IT, the use of induction immune-suppression therapy, inclusion of a liver component and maintenance therapy with rapamycin were associated with better graft survival. Outcomes of IT have modestly improved over the past decade. Case volumes have recently declined. Identifying the root reasons for late graft loss is difficult due to the low case volumes at most centers. The high participation rate in the Registry provides unique opportunities to study these issues.

The current state of intestine transplantation: indications, techniques, outcomes and challenges

Intestine transplantation is the least common form of organ transplantation in the United States and often deemed one of the most difficult. Patient and graft survival have historically trailed well behind other organ transplants. Over the past 5-10 years registry reports and single center series have demonstrated improvements to patient survival after intestinal transplantation that now match patient survival for those without life-threatening complications on parenteral nutrition. For various reasons including improvements in medical care of patients with intestinal failure and difficulty accessing transplant care, the actual number of intestine transplants has declined by 25% over the past 6 years. In light of the small numbers of intestine transplants, many physicians and the lay public are often unaware that this is a therapeutic option. The aim of this review is to describe the current indications, outcomes and advances in the field of intestine transplantation and to explore concerns over future access to this important and life-saving therapy.

Donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies in intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Early outcomes following intestinal transplantation (ITx) have markedly improved in recent years. However, there has been a lack of improvement in long-term outcomes. Increasing amounts of data suggest the humoral immune system is a major contributor to rejection and late allograft loss. This review will summarize the available data on donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs) in ITx, with a focus on the clinical significance of DSAs, diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and available treatment modalities. Areas requiring further investigation will also be identified.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mounting evidence shows that pre- and/or posttransplant DSAs are associated with rejection and allograft loss following ITx. Preformed DSAs are present in nearly one-third of ITx recipients, and de-novo DSAs develop in up to 40% of patients. Diagnosis and treatment of AMR remains challenging, but reports indicate that when optimal induction and maintenance immunosuppressive agents are used, the impact of DSAs may be negligible.

SUMMARY

Although data are limited due to center differences with regard to patient population, induction and maintenance immunosuppression protocols, and monitoring strategies, DSAs are associated with poor outcomes following ITx. A consensus to define AMR and optimal treatment strategies is needed.

Management of intestinal failure in inflammatory bowel disease: small intestinal transplantation or home parenteral nutrition?

Inflammatory bowel disease and Crohn's disease in particular, is a common cause of intestinal failure. Current therapeutic options include home parenteral nutrition and intestinal transplantation. For most patients, home intravenous therapy including parenteral nutrition, with a good probability of long-term survival, is the favoured choice. However, in selected patients, with specific features that may shorten survival or complicate home parenteral nutrition, intestinal transplantation presents a viable alternative. We present survival, complications, quality of life and economic considerations that currently influence individualised decision-making between home parenteral nutrition and intestinal transplantation.

Utility of an immune cell function assay to differentiate rejection from infectious enteritis in pediatric intestinal transplant recipients

The Cylex Immune Cell Function Assay measures cell-mediated immunity based on ATP production by stimulated CD4 + cells. We hypothesized that this test would discriminate acute cellular rejection (ACR) from infectious enteritis (IE) in pediatric intestinal transplant (ITx) recipients with allograft dysfunction. We retrospectively analyzed 224 Cylex assays drawn in 47 children who received 53 ITx. Samples were classified as stable, ACR, or IE based on clinical status. ATP values were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and t-tests. Overall, there was a statistically significant difference in ATP values based on clinical status (p = 0.03); however, overlap was observed between groups. The median ATP value during ACR was significantly greater than during stable periods (p = 0.02). No difference was seen in IE vs. stability (p = 0.8). The difference in median ATP value in ACR vs. IE approached significance (p = 0.1). Relative to previous levels, ACR episodes were associated with a median ATP increase of 101 ng/mL and IE episodes with a decrease of 3 ng/mL (p = 0.3). These data indicate that the Cylex assay has limited utility in differentiating ACR from IE, largely due to interpatient variability. Following longitudinal intrapatient trends may be an adjunctive tool in discriminating IE from ACR and guiding immunosuppression adjustments in select patients.

Clinical relevance of the de novo production of anti-HLA antibodies following intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

Despite a negative pretransplant cross-match, intestinal transplant recipients can mount humoral immune responses soon after transplantation. Moreover, the development of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) is associated with severe graft injury. Between June 2000 and August 2011, 30 patients (median age 37.6±9.8 years) received isolated intestinal transplantations (ITX, n=18) or multivisceral transplantations (MVTXs, n=12) at our center. We screened for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies pre- and post-transplant. If patients produced DSAs, treatment with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was initiated. In the event of DSA persistence and/or treatment-refractory rejection, rituximab and/or bortezomib were added. Ten patients developed DSAs and simultaneously showed significant signs of rejection. These patients received plasmapheresis and IVIG. Eight patients additionally received rituximab, and two patients were treated with bortezomib. DSA values decreased upon antirejection therapy in 8 of the 10 patients. The development of DSAs following ITX is often associated with acute rejection. We observed that the number of mismatched antigens and epitopes correlates with the probability of developing de novo DSAs. Early diagnosis and therapy, including B-cell depletion and plasma cell inhibition, are crucial to preventing further graft injury.

Liver disease secondary to intestinal failure

IFALD is a common and potentially life-threatening condition for patients with SBS requiring long-term PN. There exists the potential for decreasing its incidence by optimizing the composition and the rate of infusion of parenteral solutions, by advocating a multidisciplinary approach, and by early referral for intestinal-liver transplantation to ensure long-term survival of patients with SBS.

Intestinal Transplantation from Living Donors

Intestinal transplantation (ITx) represents the physiologic alternative to total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for patients suffering from life-threatening complications of irreversible intestinal failure. The number of transplants performed worldwide has been increasing for several years until recently. ITx has recently become a valid therapeutic option with a graft survival rate between 80 % and 90 % at 1 year, in experienced centers. These results have been achieved due to a combination of several factors: better understanding of the pathophysiology of intestinal graft, improved immunosuppression techniques, more efficient strategies for the monitoring of the bowel graft, as well as control of infectious complications and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). In fact, this procedure is associated with a relatively high rate of complications, such as infections, acute rejection, graft versus host disease (GVHD), and PTLD, if compared to the transplantation of other organs. These complications may be, at least in part, the consequence of the peculiarity of this graft, which contains gut-associated lymphoid tissue and potentially pathogenic enteric flora. Furthermore, in these patients, the existing disease and the relative malnutrition could predispose them to infectious complications. Additionally, other factors associated with the procedure, such as laparotomy, preservation injury, abnormal motility, and lymphatic disruption, could all be implicated in the development of complications.

Long-term outcomes of children after solid organ transplantation

Solid organ transplantation has transformed the lives of many children and adults by providing treatment for patients with organ failure who would have otherwise succumbed to their disease. The first successful transplant in 1954 was a kidney transplant between identical twins, which circumvented the problem of rejection from MHC incompatibility. Further progress in solid organ transplantation was enabled by the discovery of immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids and azathioprine in the 1950s and ciclosporin in 1970. Today, solid organ transplantation is a conventional treatment with improved patient and allograft survival rates. However, the challenge that lies ahead is to extend allograft survival time while simultaneously reducing the side effects of immunosuppression. This is particularly important for children who have irreversible organ failure and may require multiple transplants. Pediatric transplant teams also need to improve patient quality of life at a time of physical, emotional and psychosocial development. This review will elaborate on the long-term outcomes of children after kidney, liver, heart, lung and intestinal transplantation. As mortality rates after transplantation have declined, there has emerged an increased focus on reducing longer-term morbidity with improved outcomes in optimizing cardiovascular risk, renal impairment, growth and quality of life. Data were obtained from a review of the literature and particularly from national registries and databases such as the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies for the kidney, SPLIT for liver, International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation and UNOS for intestinal transplantation.

Incidence, prevention, and treatment of parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis and intestinal failure-associated liver disease in infants and children: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cholestasis is a significant life-threatening complication in children on parenteral nutrition (PN). Strategies to prevent/treat PN-associated cholestasis (PNAC) and intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD) have reached moderate success with little supporting evidence. Aims of this systematic review were (1) to determine the incidence of PNAC/IFALD in children receiving PN for ≥ 14 days and (2) to review the efficacy of measures to prevent/treat PNAC/IFALD.

METHODS

Of 4696 abstracts screened, 406 relevant articles were reviewed, and studies on children with PN ≥ 14 days and cholestasis (conjugated bilirubin ≥ 2 mg/dL) were included. Analyzed parameters were (1) PNAC/IFALD incidence by decade and by PN length and (2) PNAC/IFALD prevention and treatment (prospective studies).

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles (3280 patients) showed an incidence of 28.2% and 49.8% of PNAC and IFALD, respectively, with no evident alteration over the last decades. The incidence of PNAC was directly proportional to the length of PN (from 15.7% for PN ≤ 1 month up to 60.9% for PN ≥ 2 months; P < .0001). Ten studies on PNAC met inclusion criteria. High or intermediate-dose of oral erythromycin and aminoacid-free PN with enteral whey protein gained significant benefits in preterm neonates (P < .05, P = .003, and P < .001, respectively). None of the studies reviewed met inclusion criteria for treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PNAC/IFALD in children has no obvious decrease over time. PNAC is directly correlated to the length of PN. Erythromycin and aminoacid-free PN with enteral whey protein have shown to prevent PNAC in preterm neonates. There is a lack of high-quality prospective studies, especially on IFALD.

Survival of patients evaluated for intestinal and multivisceral transplantation - the Scandinavian experience

OBJECTIVE

The current treatment of choice for patients with intestinal failure is parenteral nutrition, whereas medical therapy or resection is preferred for patients with neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (NEPT) along with liver metastasis. As the survival of patients undergoing intestinal and multivisceral transplantation is improving, the discussion for expansion of treatment options has become a subject of debate. The aim was to investigate the outcome for patients referred for intestinal and multivisceral transplantation and to determine which patient group are the ones most likely to benefit the most from transplantation.

METHODS

The authors included all patients evaluated for intestinal and multivisceral transplantation at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital and The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital center between February 1998 and November 2009. Patients were classified according to proposed treatment strategy, and the outcome was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 43 adults and 19 children with either intestinal failure or NEPT with liver metastases were evaluated for transplantation. Of these patients, 15 adults and 5 children were transplanted. Transplantation was lifesaving for most children - all the children survived after transplantation, but 70% (4/6) died while awaiting transplantation. Among the adult patients with intestinal failure, the survival rate for patients considered to be stable on parenteral nutrition was higher than the transplanted adult patients. The survival rate of patients with NEPT was similar to the results seen among patients transplanted for intestinal failure.

CONCLUSION

The results confirm the poor prognosis of patients with intestinal failure awaiting transplantation and indicate that different transplantation criteria may be applied for adults and children, especially when early transplantation is the preferred treatment. The role of multivisceral transplantation in patients with NEPT remains uncertain.

From gut to kidney: transporting and metabolizing calcineurin-inhibitors in solid organ transplantation

Since their introduction circa 35 years ago, calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI) have become the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation. However, CNI's possess a narrow therapeutic index with potential severe consequences of drug under- or overexposure. This demands a meticulous policy of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) to optimize outcome. In clinical practice optimal dosing is difficult to achieve due to important inter- and intraindividual variation in CNI pharmacokinetics. A complex and often interdependent set of factors appears relevant in determining drug exposure. These include recipient characteristics such as age, race, body composition, organ function, and food intake, but also graft-related characteristics such as: size, donor-age, and time after transplantation can be important. Fundamental (in vitro) and clinical studies have pointed out the intrinsic relation between the aforementioned variables and the functional capacity of enzymes and transporters involved in CNI metabolism, primarily located in intestine, liver and kidney. Commonly occurring polymorphisms in genes responsible for CNI metabolism (CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP3A7, PXR, POR, ABCB1 (P-gp) and possibly UGT) are able to explain an important part of interindividual variability. In particular, a highly prevalent SNP in CYP3A5 has proven to be an important determinant of CNI dose requirements and drug-dose-interactions. In addition, a discrepancy in genotype between graft and receptor has to be taken into account. Furthermore, common phenomena in solid organ transplantation such as inflammation, ischemia- reperfusion injury, graft function, co-medication, altered food intake and intestinal motility can have a differential effect on the expression enzymes and transporters involved in CNI metabolism. Notwithstanding the built-up knowledge, predicting individual CNI pharmacokinetics and dose requirements on the basis of current clinical and experimental data remains a challenge.

Antibody-mediated rejection after intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In spite of impressive improvements in short-term outcomes for intestine transplant recipients, late allograft loss continues to plague the field. Attention has mostly been focused on T-cell-mediated cellular mechanisms of allograft rejection to explain these losses; however, as in other forms of solid-organ transplantation, especially kidney and heart, antibody-mediated mechanisms of acute and chronic allograft injury are increasingly being implicated. In this review, the mechanisms of B-cell- and humoral-mediated allograft injury will be briefly discussed along with the limited evidence that exist for invoking antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) as important in intestine transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The presence of donor-specific antibody has been reported to increase the incidence and severity of intestine allograft rejection and to worsen the overall prognosis for graft and patient. C4d staining in intestine biopsies is unreliable, and currently it is not possible to diagnose AMR with certainty in intestine transplantation. Treatment of presumed AMR in intestine recipients is purely anecdotal at this time.

SUMMARY

Further basic and clinical research needs to be conducted to more confidently diagnose and treat AMR in intestinal transplantation.

Short bowel syndrome in the NICU

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is the most common cause of intestinal failure in infants. In neonates and young infants, necrotizing enterocolitis, gastroschisis, intestinal atresia, and intestinal malrotation/volvulus are the leading causes of SBS. Following an acute postsurgical phase, the residual gastrointestinal tract adapts with reorganization of the crypt-villus histoarchitecture and functional changes in nutrient absorption and motility. A cohesive, multidisciplinary approach can allow most neonates with SBS to transition to full enteral feeds and achieve normal growth and development. In this article, the clinical features, management, complications, and prognostic factors in SBS are reviewed.