Utility of colon allograft biopsies in surveillance of patients with small intestinal transplantation – A systematic study of 129 biopsies

Introduction/Objective

A segment of right colon is sometimes included with small intestinal allografts to preserve the ileocecal valve and maintain water reabsorption. We correlated pathological findings of colon allograft biopsies obtained during surveillance colonoscopies with clinical, endoscopic, and microbiologic findings.

Methods/Case Report

All colon allograft biopsies from surveillance colonoscopies over a 3-year period were reviewed for crypt apoptotic activity, cryptitis, lamina propria inflammation, ulceration, and crypt architectural distortion. Clinical and endoscopic findings, and positive cultures a week before and after the biopsies were recorded.

Results (if a Case Study enter NA)

There were 129 colon biopsies from 29 patients; 98 were histologically normal, whereas 28 showed rare apoptoses (n=14), focal cryptitis (n=8), increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (n=2), moderate acute rejection (n=1), and crypt architectural distortion (n=2). Of these 29 patients, 8 had abnormal endoscopic findings, 21 were normal. Out of 8 patients with abnormal endoscopic exams, 50% had normal histology on biopsy. Twenty-one biopsies were associated with positive cultures in the blood (n=5), urine (n=16) or wound, peritoneal, stool (n=6); 3 had abnormal endoscopies, and 4, abnormal histology. One patient with C.difficle toxin had normal endoscopy and focal cryptitis, whereas another with CMV DNA in blood showed endoscopically congested mucosa and rare apoptoses on biopsy. Of 12 biopsies (7 patients) with abnormal endoscopic findings, (erythema, congestion, ulceration), 4 biopsies had no pathologic findings, 8 had rare apoptosis, and one each had focal cryptitis and chronic colitis. Paired small intestinal biopsies were present with 59 biopsies; 10 showed rare apoptosis and 2, focal cryptitis. Of 70 without paired small intestinal biopsies, there were 5 with rare apoptotic bodies, 5 with focal cryptitis, and 2 with crypt architectural distortion.

Conclusion

The correlation of histologic, endoscopic, and microbiologic findings in colonic allograft surveillance biopsies is inconsistent. Colon allograft biopsies have limited utility in the follow-up of patients, particularly in absence of paired small intestinal biopsies.

Intestinal transplant registry report: global activity and trends

The Registry has gathered information on intestine transplantation (IT) since 1985. During this time, individual centers have reported progress but small case volumes potentially limit the generalizability of this information. The present study was undertaken to examine recent global IT activity. Activity was assessed with descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and a multiple variable analysis. Eighty-two programs reported 2887 transplants in 2699 patients. Regional practices and outcomes are now similar worldwide. Current actuarial patient survival rates are 76%, 56% and 43% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Rates of graft loss beyond 1 year have not improved. Grafts that included a colon segment had better function. Waiting at home for IT, the use of induction immune-suppression therapy, inclusion of a liver component and maintenance therapy with rapamycin were associated with better graft survival. Outcomes of IT have modestly improved over the past decade. Case volumes have recently declined. Identifying the root reasons for late graft loss is difficult due to the low case volumes at most centers. The high participation rate in the Registry provides unique opportunities to study these issues.

Intestinal transplantation: an overview

Intestinal transplantation is just now beginning to emerge as a viable therapeutic option for the large number of patients worldwide with intestinal failure. Intestinal transplantation has experienced consistent growth over the last decade as clinical outcomes have improved. As more centers gain experience in performing and managing these complex transplant patients, referral patterns are established to facilitate the movement of patients to those centers with expertise in this area. As these intestinal transplant centers evolve, indications for intestinal transplantation will change and more patients will be helped. It is critical that general surgeons and gastroenterologists are familiar with the field of intestinal transplantation, as many of their most difficult patients may derive great benefit from this option.