1
|
Shaw BI, Ord JR, Nobuhara C, Luo X. Cellular Therapies in Solid Organ Allotransplantation: Promise and Pitfalls. Front Immunol 2021; 12:714723. [PMID: 34526991 PMCID: PMC8435835 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.714723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Donor specific transfusions have been the basis of tolerance inducing protocols since Peter Medawar showed that it was experimentally feasible in the 1950s. Though trials of cellular therapies have become increasingly common in solid organ transplantation, they have not become standard practice. Additionally, whereas some protocols have focused on cellular therapies as a method for donor antigen delivery—thought to promote tolerance in and of itself in the correct immunologic context—other approaches have alternatively focused on the intrinsic immunosuppressive properties of the certain cell types with less emphasis on their origin, including mesenchymal stem cells, regulatory T cells, and regulatory dendritic cells. Regardless of intent, all cellular therapies must contend with the potential that introducing donor antigen in a new context will lead to sensitization. In this review, we focus on the variety of cellular therapies that have been applied in human trials and non-human primate models, describe their efficacy, highlight data regarding their potential for sensitization, and discuss opportunities for cellular therapies within our current understanding of the immune landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian I Shaw
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jeffrey R Ord
- School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Chloe Nobuhara
- School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Xunrong Luo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ducloux D, Bamoulid J, Crepin T, Rebibou JM, Courivaud C, Saas P. Posttransplant Immune Activation: Innocent Bystander or Insidious Culprit of Posttransplant Accelerated Atherosclerosis. Cell Transplant 2018; 26:1601-1609. [PMID: 29113470 PMCID: PMC5680959 DOI: 10.1177/0963689717735404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity, disability, and mortality in kidney transplant patients. Cumulative reports indicate that the excessive risk of cardiovascular events is not entirely explained by the increased prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, and it has been postulated that posttransplant immune disturbances may explain the gap between the predicted and observed risks of cardiovascular events. Although concordant data suggest that innate immunity contributes to the posttransplant accelerated atherosclerosis, only few arguments plead for a role of adaptive immunity. We report and discuss here consistent data demonstrating that CD8+ T cell activation is a frequent posttransplant immune feature that may have pro-atherogenic effects. Expansion of exhausted/activated CD8+ T cells in kidney transplant recipients is stimulated by several factors including cytomegalovirus infections, lymphodepletive therapy (e.g., antithymocyte globulins), chronic allogeneic stimulation, and a past history of renal insufficiency. This is observed in the setting of decreased thymic activity, a process also found in elderly individuals and reflecting accelerated immune senescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Didier Ducloux
- 1 Inserm, UMR1098, Federation Hospitalo-Universitaire INCREASE, Besançon, France.,2 Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Renal Transplantation, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Jamal Bamoulid
- 1 Inserm, UMR1098, Federation Hospitalo-Universitaire INCREASE, Besançon, France.,2 Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Renal Transplantation, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Thomas Crepin
- 1 Inserm, UMR1098, Federation Hospitalo-Universitaire INCREASE, Besançon, France.,2 Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Renal Transplantation, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Jean-Michel Rebibou
- 1 Inserm, UMR1098, Federation Hospitalo-Universitaire INCREASE, Besançon, France.,3 Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Renal Transplantation, CHU Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Cecile Courivaud
- 1 Inserm, UMR1098, Federation Hospitalo-Universitaire INCREASE, Besançon, France.,2 Department of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Renal Transplantation, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Philippe Saas
- 1 Inserm, UMR1098, Federation Hospitalo-Universitaire INCREASE, Besançon, France.,4 EFS, UMR1098, Plateforme de BioMonitoring, Besançon, France.,5 Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté (UBFC), UMR1098, Besançon, France.,6 INSERM CIC-1431, Besançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu H, Bendersky VA, Brennan TV, Espinosa JR, Kirk AD. IL-7 receptor heterogeneity as a mechanism for repertoire change during postdepletional homeostatic proliferation and its relation to costimulation blockade-resistant rejection. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:720-730. [PMID: 29136317 PMCID: PMC6035390 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2017] [Revised: 10/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Kidney transplant patients treated with belatacept without depletional induction experience higher rates of acute rejection compared to patients treated with conventional immunosuppression. Costimulation blockade-resistant rejection (CoBRR) is associated with terminally differentiated T cells. Alemtuzumab induction and belatacept/sirolimus immunotherapy effectively prevent CoBRR. We hypothesized that cells in late phases of differentiation would be selectively less capable than more naive phenotypes of repopulating postdepletion, providing a potential mechanism by which lymphocyte depletion and repopulation could reduce the risk of CoBRR. Lymphocytes from 20 recipients undergoing alemtuzumab-induced depletion and belatacept/sirolimus immunosuppression were studied longitudinally for markers of maturation (CCR7, CD45RA, CD57, PD1), recent thymic emigration (CD31), and the IL-7 receptor-α (IL-7Rα). Serum was analyzed for IL-7. Alemtuzumab induction produced profound lymphopenia followed by repopulation, during which naive IL-7Rα+ CD57- PD1- cells progressively became the predominant subset. This did not occur in a comparator group of 10 patients treated with conventional immunosuppression. Serum from depleted patients showed markedly elevated IL-7 levels posttransplantation. Sorted CD57- PD1- cells demonstrated robust proliferation in response to IL-7, whereas more differentiated cells proliferated poorly. These data suggest that differences in IL-7-dependent proliferation is one exploitable mechanism that distinguishes CoB-sensitive and CoB-resistant T cell populations to reduce the risk of CoBRR. (ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT00565773.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- He Xu
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Todd V Brennan
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jaclyn R Espinosa
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Allan D Kirk
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Husson J, Stafford K, Bromberg J, Haririan A, Sparkes T, Davis C, Redfield R, Amoroso A. Association Between Duration of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Viral Suppression Prior to Renal Transplantation and Acute Cellular Rejection. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:551-556. [PMID: 27458893 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2015] [Revised: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Renal transplant has become an important option for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with end-stage renal disease; however, these patients experience a high rate of acute cellular rejection (ACR). Guidelines do not currently exist for the optimal duration of viral suppression prior to transplantation. In a retrospective cohort analysis of 47 HIV-infected renal transplant recipients, we compared the rate of ACR between patients based on the length of time of viral suppression prior to transplantation. Of the patients who achieved viral suppression for >6 months but less than 2 years prior to transplantation (n = 15), 60% experienced ACR compared to 41% of patients suppressed at least 2 years or more (n = 32) prior to transplant (p = 0.21). Patients suppressed <2 years experienced ACR at 2.48 times the rate of those suppressed 2 years or longer. Induction immunosuppression, HLA mismatch and panel-reactive antibodies (PRAs) did not significantly differ between the two groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Husson
- The Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - K Stafford
- The Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - J Bromberg
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Haririan
- Division of Nephrology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - T Sparkes
- University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD
| | - C Davis
- The Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - R Redfield
- The Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - A Amoroso
- The Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Antigen-experienced T cells, also known as memory T cells, are functionally and phenotypically distinct from naive T cells. Their enhanced expression of adhesion molecules and reduced requirement for co-stimulation enables them to mount potent and rapid recall responses to subsequent antigen encounters. Memory T cells generated in response to prior antigen exposures can cross-react with other nonidentical, but similar, antigens. This heterologous cross-reactivity not only enhances protective immune responses, but also engenders de novo alloimmunity. This latter characteristic is increasingly recognized as a potential barrier to allograft acceptance that is worthy of immunotherapeutic intervention, and several approaches have been investigated. Calcineurin inhibition effectively controls memory T-cell responses to allografts, but this benefit comes at the expense of increased infectious morbidity. Lymphocyte depletion eliminates allospecific T cells but spares memory T cells to some extent, such that patients do not completely lose protective immunity. Co-stimulation blockade is associated with reduced adverse-effect profiles and improved graft function relative to calcineurin inhibition, but lacks efficacy in controlling memory T-cell responses. Targeting the adhesion molecules that are upregulated on memory T cells might offer additional means to control co-stimulation-blockade-resistant memory T-cell responses.
Collapse
|
6
|
Xu H, Samy KP, Guasch A, Mead SI, Ghali A, Mehta A, Stempora L, Kirk AD. Postdepletion Lymphocyte Reconstitution During Belatacept and Rapamycin Treatment in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Am J Transplant 2016; 16:550-64. [PMID: 26436448 PMCID: PMC4822163 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2015] [Revised: 07/09/2015] [Accepted: 07/17/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Belatacept is used to prevent allograft rejection but fails to do so in a sizable minority of patients due to inadequate control of costimulation-resistant T cells. In this study, we report control of costimulation-resistant rejection when belatacept was combined with perioperative alemtuzumab-mediated lymphocyte depletion and rapamycin. To assess the means by which the alemtuzumab, belatacept and rapamycin (ABR) regimen controls belatacept-resistant rejection, we studied 20 ABR-treated patients and characterized peripheral lymphocyte phenotype and functional responses to donor, third-party and viral antigens using flow cytometry, intracellular cytokine staining and carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester-based lymphocyte proliferation. Compared with conventional immunosuppression in 10 patients, lymphocyte depletion evoked substantial homeostatic lymphocyte activation balanced by regulatory T and B cell phenotypes. The reconstituted T cell repertoire was enriched for CD28(+) naïve cells, notably diminished in belatacept-resistant CD28(-) memory subsets and depleted of polyfunctional donor-specific T cells but able to respond to third-party and latent herpes viruses. B cell responses were similarly favorable, without alloantibody development and a reduction in memory subsets-changes not seen in conventionally treated patients. The ABR regimen uniquely altered the immune profile, producing a repertoire enriched for CD28(+) T cells, hyporesponsive to donor alloantigen and competent in its protective immune capabilities. The resulting repertoire was permissive for control of rejection with belatacept monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- He Xu
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Kannan P. Samy
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Sue I. Mead
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ada Ghali
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Aneesh Mehta
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Linda Stempora
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Allan D. Kirk
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC,Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rosenblum JM, Kirk AD. Recollective homeostasis and the immune consequences of peritransplant depletional induction therapy. Immunol Rev 2015; 258:167-82. [PMID: 24517433 DOI: 10.1111/imr.12155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
One's cellular immune repertoire is composed of lymphocytes in multiple stages of maturation - the dynamic product of their responses to antigenic challenges and the homeostatic contractions necessary to accommodate immune expansions within physiologic norms. Given that alloreactivity is predominantly a cross-reactive phenomenon that is stochastically distributed throughout the overall T-cell repertoire, one's allospecific repertoire is similarly made up of cells in a variety of differentiation states. As such, the continuous expansion and elimination of activated memory populations, producing a 'recollective homeostasis' of sorts, has the potential over time to alter the maturation state and effector composition of both ones protective and alloreactive T-cell repertoire. Importantly, a T cell's maturation state significantly influences its response to numerous immunomodulatory therapies used in organ transplantation, including depletional antibody induction. In this review, we discuss clinically utilized depletional induction strategies, how their use alters a transplant recipient's cellular immune repertoire, and how a recipient's repertoire influences the clinical effects of induction therapy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mou D, Espinosa J, Lo DJ, Kirk AD. CD28 negative T cells: is their loss our gain? Am J Transplant 2014; 14:2460-6. [PMID: 25323029 PMCID: PMC4886707 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2014] [Revised: 06/15/2014] [Accepted: 07/16/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
CD28 is a primary costimulation molecule for T cell activation. However, during the course of activation some T cells lose this molecule and assume a CD28-independent existence. These CD28- T cells are generally antigen-experienced and highly differentiated. CD28- T cells are functionally heterogeneous. Their characteristics vary largely on the context in which they are found and range from having enhanced cytotoxic abilities to promoting immune regulation. Thus, CD28 loss appears to be more of a marker for advanced differentiation regardless of the cytotoxic or regulatory function being conducted by the T cell. CD28- T cells are now being recognized as playing significant roles in several human diseases. Various functional CD28- populations have been characterized in inflammatory conditions, infections and cancers. Of note, the recent introduction of costimulation blockade-based therapies, particularly those that inhibit CD28-B7 interactions, has made CD28 loss particularly relevant for solid organ transplantation. Certain CD28- T cell populations seem to promote allograft tolerance whereas others contribute to alloreactivity and costimulation blockade resistant rejection. Elucidating the interplay between these populations and characterizing the determinants of their ultimate function may have relevance for clinical risk stratification and personal determination of optimal posttransplant immune management.
Collapse
|
9
|
Transplantation: The promise of co-stimulatory blockade in transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol 2013; 9:189-90. [PMID: 23458927 DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2013.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
10
|
Lo DJ, Anderson DJ, Weaver TA, Leopardi F, Song M, Farris AB, Strobert EA, Jenkins J, Turgeon NA, Mehta AK, Larsen CP, Kirk AD. Belatacept and sirolimus prolong nonhuman primate renal allograft survival without a requirement for memory T cell depletion. Am J Transplant 2013; 13:320-8. [PMID: 23311611 PMCID: PMC3558532 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04342.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2012] [Revised: 10/02/2012] [Accepted: 10/15/2012] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Belatacept is an inhibitor of CD28/B7 costimulation that is clinically indicated as a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) alternative in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids after renal transplantation. We sought to develop a clinically translatable, nonlymphocyte depleting, belatacept-based regimen that could obviate the need for both CNIs and steroids. Thus, based on murine data showing synergy between costimulation blockade and mTOR inhibition, we studied rhesus monkeys undergoing MHC-mismatched renal allotransplants treated with belatacept and the mTOR inhibitor, sirolimus. To extend prior work on costimulation blockade-resistant rejection, some animals also received CD2 blockade with alefacept (LFA3-Ig). Belatacept and sirolimus therapy successfully prevented rejection in all animals. Tolerance was not induced, as animals rejected after withdrawal of therapy. The regimen did not deplete T cells. Alefecept did not add a survival benefit to the optimized belatacept and sirolimus regimen, despite causing an intended depletion of memory T cells, and caused a marked reduction in regulatory T cells. Furthermore, alefacept-treated animals had a significantly increased incidence of CMV reactivation, suggesting that this combination overly compromised protective immunity. These data support belatacept and sirolimus as a clinically translatable, nondepleting, CNI-free, steroid-sparing immunomodulatory regimen that promotes sustained rejection-free allograft survival after renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J Lo
- Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|