Cerebrospinal fluid exchange after intrathecal methotrexate overdose. A report of two cases

Drainage or lavage as a salvage manoeuvre after intrathecal drug errors: A systematic review with therapeutic recommendations

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage and lavage are reported to reduce drug exposure after inadvertant intrathecal drug administration errors. This reviews aims to provide recommendations for this salvage technique, with regard to methodology, effectiveness and adverse events.

DESIGN

Systematic review. A search in the databases of Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Trials and Google Scholar was performed in 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All reports of individual patient data with CSF drainage or lavage with a percutaneous lumbar access for an intrathecal drug error were included.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome is the description and count of CSF drainage or lavage, such as times and volume of drainage, volume of replacement and type of replacement fluid. Secondary outcomes are the effects, adverse events and overall outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

58 cases were found, of which 24 were paediatric cases. There was a large variance in methodology, with regard to volume t and type of replacement fluid. In 45% of the cases the intrathecal drug removal continued. The effects were specifically reported in 27 cases, all demonstrated drug removal based on drug concentrations in the CSF (n = 20) and clinical signs (n = 7). Adverse effects were sought for in 17 cases and found intracranial haemorrhage in 3 cases. No interventions were required for these adverse events and the only reported long-term sequelae in these three patients was short-term memory impairment up to 6 months after the event (n = 1). The overall outcome depended largely on the causative agent.

CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that CSF drainage or lavage leads to intrathecal drug removal, but it is unsure if this intervention leads to improved overall patient outcome. Based on aggregated data from case reports, we provide recommendations that may guide clinicians. The risk-benefit ratio should be weighed on a case-to-case basis.

Extracorporeal Treatment for Methotrexate Poisoning: Systematic Review and Recommendations from the EXTRIP Workgroup

Methotrexate is used in the treatment of many malignancies, rheumatological diseases, and inflammatory bowel disease. Toxicity from use is associated with severe morbidity and mortality. Rescue treatments include intravenous hydration, folinic acid, and, in some centers, glucarpidase. We conducted systematic reviews of the literature following published EXtracorporeal TReatments In Poisoning (EXTRIP) methods to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments in the management of methotrexate toxicity. The quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations (either "strong" or "weak/conditional") were graded according to the GRADE approach. A formal voting process using a modified Delphi method assessed the level of agreement between panelists on the final recommendations. A total of 92 articles met inclusion criteria. Toxicokinetic data were available on 90 patients (89 with impaired kidney function). Methotrexate was considered to be moderately dialyzable by intermittent hemodialysis. Data were available for clinical analysis on 109 patients (high-dose methotrexate [>0.5 g/m²]: 91 patients; low-dose [≤0.5 g/m²]: 18). Overall mortality in these publications was 19.5% and 26.7% in those with high-dose and low-dose methotrexate-related toxicity, respectively. Although one observational study reported lower mortality in patients treated with glucarpidase compared with those treated with hemodialysis, there were important limitations in the study. For patients with severe methotrexate toxicity receiving standard care, the EXTRIP workgroup: (1) suggested against extracorporeal treatments when glucarpidase is not administered; (2) recommended against extracorporeal treatments when glucarpidase is administered; and (3) recommended against extracorporeal treatments instead of administering glucarpidase. The quality of evidence for these recommendations was very low. Rationales for these recommendations included: (1) extracorporeal treatments mainly remove drugs in the intravascular compartment, whereas methotrexate rapidly distributes into cells; (2) extracorporeal treatments remove folinic acid; (3) in rare cases where fast removal of methotrexate is required, glucarpidase will outperform any extracorporeal treatment; and (4) extracorporeal treatments do not appear to reduce the incidence and magnitude of methotrexate toxicity.

Improving the Brain Delivery of Chemotherapeutic Drugs in Childhood Brain Tumors

The central nervous system (CNS) may be considered as a sanctuary site, protected from systemic chemotherapy by the meninges, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Consequently, parenchymal and CSF exposure of most antineoplastic agents following intravenous (IV) administration is lower than systemic exposure. In this review, we describe the different strategies developed to improve delivery of antineoplastic agents into the brain in primary and metastatic CNS tumors. We observed that several methods, such as BBB disruption (BBBD), intra-arterial (IA) and intracavitary chemotherapy, are not routinely used because of their invasiveness and potentially serious adverse effects. Conversely, intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy has been safely and widely practiced in the treatment of pediatric primary and metastatic tumors, replacing the neurotoxic cranial irradiation for the treatment of childhood lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). IT chemotherapy may be achieved through lumbar puncture (LP) or across the Ommaya intraventricular reservoir, which are both described in this review. Additionally, we overviewed pharmacokinetics and toxic aspects of the main IT antineoplastic drugs employed for primary or metastatic childhood CNS tumors (such as methotrexate, cytosine arabinoside, hydrocortisone), with a concise focus on new and less used IT antineoplastic agents.

Treatment of two cases on the same day of intrathecal methotrexate overdose using cerebrospinal fluid exchange and intrathecal instillation of carboxypeptidase-G2

BACKGROUND

Two 14-year old boys with acute lymphocytic leukemia were treated according to the NOPHO-ALL-08 protocol with intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) on the same day. Due to a preparation error in the hospital pharmacy, they were both given 240 mg of MTX instead of the prescribed 12 mg. Treatment (or methods): Both patients developed acute neurotoxicity with confusion, pain and seizures. Intravenous dexamethasone and folinic acid (leucovorin) was given. Exchange of cerebrospinal fluid was performed. Intrathecal glucarpidase (carboxypeptidase-G2) was administered after 11 h.

RESULTS

One patient developed a toxic arachnoiditis. Three years after the incident, one patient has no neurological or neuropsychological sequelae after the overdose, while the other reports some loss of short-term memory.

CONCLUSION

Fast recognition and treatment of intrathecal MTX overdose is critical to survival and outcome. Efforts to prevent such overdoses are of vital importance.

Inadvertent intrathecal injections and best practice management

The intrathecal space has become an important anatomic site for medical intervention not only in anesthesia practice, but also in many other medical specialties. Undesired/inadvertent intrathecal injections (UII) are generally rare. There is tremendous variation in reported inadvertent administrations via an intrathecal route in the literature, mainly as individual cases and very small case-series reports. This review aims to identify potential sources of UII, its clinical presentations, and appropriate management. The inadvertent injectants are classified as anesthetic agents and pain medicines, chemotherapeutics, radiological contrast agents, antibiotics and corticosteroids, and miscellaneous chemical agents such as tranexamic acid. The clinical effects of UII are dependent upon inadvertent injectant(s) and dose being administered intrathecally, and can range from no adverse effect to profound neurological consequences and/or death. Prompt cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lavage and cardiopulmonary support seem to be the mainstay of treatment. If serious consequences are anticipated, CSF lavage could be lifesaving. This review additionally provides some options for comprehensive management and preventing strategies.

Intrathecal chemotherapy: potential for medication error

BACKGROUND

The central nervous system is a unique sanctuary site for malignant disease. To ensure optimal disease control, intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy is commonly given in conjunction with standard chemotherapy protocols, thus providing the opportunity for medication errors.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of the current literature on medication errors associated with the administration of IT chemotherapy was conducted.

METHODS

English-language literature published from January 1960 through June 2013 was accessed. Case reports, clinical studies, and review articles pertaining to IT medication errors were included in the review. References of all relevant articles were searched for additional citations.

RESULTS

Twenty-two cases of accidental IT overdoses have been reported with methotrexate and 1 with cytarabine. There have been numerous cases of antineoplastic agents intended for administration by the parenteral route being inadvertently given intrathecally. Vincristine has been implicated 31 times (25 deaths), as well as vindesine, asparaginase, bortezomib, daunorubicin, and dactinomycin. This has led to profound toxicity and, commonly, death. Unfortunately, many cases go unrecognized or unreported.

CONCLUSIONS

The best method for eliminating the risk of IT medication errors is to develop effective methods of prevention and incorporate them into oncology and hematology practice internationally. Strategies include abolishing the syringe as a method of vinca alkaloid administration and substituting small-volume intravenous bags, and developing novel methods for intraspinal drug administration.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The nursing profession is in a unique position to influence change and lead the way in establishing preventative strategies into current practice.

Large-volume intrathecal enzyme delivery increases survival of a mouse model of late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

Late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (LINCL) is a progressive neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disorder caused by mutations in TPP1, the gene encoding the lysosomal protease tripeptidyl-peptidase (TPP1). LINCL primarily affects children, is fatal and there is no effective treatment. Administration of recombinant protein has proved effective in treatment of visceral manifestations of other lysosomal storage disorders but to date, only marginal improvement in survival has been obtained for neurological diseases. In this study, we have developed and optimized a large-volume intrathecal administration strategy to deliver therapeutic amounts of TPP1 to the central nervous system (CNS) of a mouse model of LINCL. To determine the efficacy of treatment, we have monitored survival as the primary endpoint and demonstrate that an acute treatment regimen (three consecutive daily doses started at 4 weeks of age) increases median lifespan of the LINCL mice from 16 (vehicle treated) to 23 weeks (enzyme treated). Consistent with the increase in life-span, we also observed significant reversal of pathology and improvement in neurological phenotype. These results provide a strong basis for both clinical investigation of large-volume/high-dose delivery of TPP1 to the brain via the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and extension of this approach towards other neurological lysosomal storage diseases.

Delayed recognition of intrathecal methotrexate overdose

A 10-year-old girl who presented to our hospital was diagnosed as having B-precursor cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. St Jude's Total XIII protocol was started. In the second block of the consolidation phase, 10 hours after triple intrathecal treatment, we realized that instead of 12 mg, 120 mg of methotrexate had accidentally been given. Although the patient had no symptoms 10 hours after intrathecal treatment, to prevent the possible neurotoxic effects of methotrexate, a cerebrospinal fluid exchange was performed. Simultaneously, systemic dexamethasone and calcium folinic acid were given. At the time of this writing (2 y), the patient has had no symptoms and has continued on the chemotherapy protocol as planned. Administration of high-dose intrathecal methotrexate may not lead to symptoms, as was the case in our patient. This may be related to individual variations in cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and drug metabolism.

Intrathecal methotrexate neurotoxicity: clinical correlates and antidotal treatment

The neurotoxicity of methotrexate (MTX) is more severe when administered intrathecally (IT) than by the oral and intravenous (IV) routes, and has been reported even with a single administration of therapeutic doses of 12 or 15mg. Prompt recognition and treatment are essential to improve the outcome after massive IT-MTX overdose. Treatment options include CSF drainage or CSF exchange, ventriculolumbar perfusion, IT corticosteroids to reduce CSF inflammation and IV leucovorin to reduce systemic toxicity. Toxicity resulting from IT injection of leucovorin is controversial. CSF drainage and exchange are particularly effective if performed soon after the overdose. In this paper we describe a protocol of treatment for severe cases of IT-MTX overdose in excess of 100mg. The mainstay of treatment is dilution and removal from CSF of excessive methotrexate alongside with specific antidotal therapy.

Intrathecal chemotherapy with antineoplastic agents in children

Intrathecal chemotherapy with antineoplastic agents is mainly utilised in children with leukaemia and lymphoma, and in selected brain tumours. In these diseases, intrathecal use is restricted to methotrexate (MTX), cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) and corticosteroids. A number of other agents are, at the present time, under evaluation. Intrathecal MTX administered sequentially with systemic high dose MTX infusion prolongs therapeutic cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) levels of the drug. Prolonged therapeutic CSF levels can also be achieved by giving repeated small intrathecal doses of MTX over an extended period in selected patients, with an implanted Ommaya reservoir. In the CSF, the metabolic inactivation of Ara-C is significantly lower than in plasma with a CSF clearance similar to the rate of CSF bulk flow. A slow-release formulation of Ara-C may be given intrathecally, resulting in a prolonged cytotoxic concentration in the CSF. CNS relapse and neurotoxicity in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, especially younger children, may be reduced by using age-related dosing of intrathecal MTX and Ara-C. Hydrocortisone is used in combination with MTX and Ara-C for so-called 'triple intrathecal chemotherapy' in the treatment of meningeal leukaemia. Intrathecal thiotepa does not appear to be advantageous over systemic administration in patients with brain and meningeal leukaemia. Monoclonal antibodies, reactive with tumour-associated antigens, can be used as delivery systems for chemotherapeutic agents and radionuclides. However, the development of this new approach is currently under evaluation in larger clinical studies. Neurological adverse effects may be expected with intrathecal chemotherapy and are increased by high dose systemic therapy, concomitant cranial radiotherapy or meningeal infiltration by neoplastic cells. Inadvertant intrathecal administration of antineoplastic agents that are indicated for systemic administration only, is dangerous and may result in a fatal outcome.

Bacillus cereus bacteremia and meningitis in immunocompromised children

Two cases of Bacillus cereus meningitis in immunocompromised children at our hospital within a 2-month period prompted us to review B. cereus--related invasive disease. We identified 12 patients with B. cereus isolated in blood cultures from September 1988 through August 2000 at our institution. Three of these patients also had B. cereus isolated from CSF specimens; 1 additional patient had possible CNS involvement (33%, group A), whereas 8 patients had no evidence of CNS involvement (67%, group B). Patients in group A were more likely to have neutropenia at the onset of sepsis and were more likely to have an unfavorable outcome. They were also more likely to have received intrathecal chemotherapy in the week before the onset of their illness. Two patients from group A died. One survived with severe sequelae. The fourth patient had mild sequelae at follow-up. No sequelae or deaths occurred among patients in group B. In patients with unfavorable outcomes, the interval from the time of recognition of illness to irreversible damage or death was short, which demonstrates a need for increased awareness, early diagnosis, and more-effective therapy, particularly that which addresses B. cereus toxins.

Accidental iatrogenic intoxications by cytotoxic drugs: error analysis and practical preventive strategies

OBJECTIVES

Drug errors are quite common. Many of them become harmful only if they remain undetected, ultimately resulting in injury to the patient. Errors with cytotoxic drugs are especially dangerous because of the highly toxic potential of the drugs involved. For medico-legal reasons, only 1 case of accidental iatrogenic intoxication by cytotoxic drugs tends to be investigated at a time, because the focus is placed on individual responsibility rather than on system errors. The aim of our study was to investigate whether accidental iatrogenic intoxications by cytotoxic drugs are faults of either the individual or the system. The statistical analysis of distribution and quality of such errors, and the in-depth analysis of contributing factors delivered a rational basis for the development of practical preventive strategies.

METHODS

A total of 134 cases of accidental iatrogenic intoxication by a cytotoxic drug (from literature reports since 1966 identified by an electronic literature survey, as well as our own unpublished cases) underwent a systematic error analysis based on a 2-dimensional model of error generation. Incidents were classified by error characteristics and point in time of occurrence, and their distribution was statistically evaluated. The theories of error research, informatics, sensory physiology, cognitive psychology, occupational medicine and management have helped to classify and depict potential sources of error as well as reveal clues for error prevention.

RESULTS

Monocausal errors were the exception. In the majority of cases, a confluence of unfavourable circumstances either brought about the error, or prevented its timely interception. Most cases with a fatal outcome involved erroneous drug administration. Object-inherent factors were the predominant causes. A lack of expert as well as general knowledge was a contributing element. In error detection and prevention of error sequelae, supervision and back-checking are essential. Improvement of both the individual training and work environment, enhanced object identification by manufacturers and hospitals, increased redundancy, proper usage of technical aids, and restructuring of systems are the hallmarks for error prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Errors follow general patterns even in oncology. Complex interdependencies of contributing factors are the rule. Thus, system changes of the working environment are most promising with regard to error prevention. Effective error control involves adapting a set of basic principles to the specific work environment. The work environment should allow for rectification of errors without penalty. Regular and ongoing intra-organisational error analysis needs to be an integral part of any error prevention strategy. However, it seems impossible to totally eliminate errors. Instead, if the environment guarantees timely error interception, most sequelae are avoided, and errors transform into a system-wide learning tool.

Intrathecal methotrexate overdose

We report two cases of intrathecal methotrexate overdose. A 3-y-old girl with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and a 4-y-old boy with Burkitt's lymphoma were to receive an intrathecal injection of methotrexate after completion of intravenous methotrexate infusion. Instead of 12.5 mg, they both received a dose of 125 mg. Both children developed generalized convulsion 3 h after the overdose, but afterwards recovered completely. Intravenous folinic acid and dexamethasone rescue were employed, but no attempt was made to exchange the cerebrospinal fluid. In addition to the staff's failure to check the drug label carefully, the marked resemblance of the two dose preparations of methotrexate (50 mg/5 ml and 500 mg/5 ml) may have been contributory.

Intrathecal leucovorin after intrathecal methotrexate overdose

PURPOSE

Intrathecal methotrexate is a standard and important therapy in acute leukemia. Unfortunately, overdose is a well reported complication of this therapy. We report a fatal event secondary to intrathecal leucovorin.

PATIENTS, METHODS, AND RESULTS

An 11-year-old boy with a 6-month history of treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia received an "overdose" of 20 mg of intrathecal methotrexate. He was treated with intrathecal leucovorin and subsequently experienced severe neurotoxicity and died. This was attributed to the use of intrathecal leucovorin, the first such case reported in the medical literature.

CONCLUSION

A review of the literature indicates that a careful definition of overdose needs to be applied in cases of intrathecal methotrexate: those <100 mg need less intervention, >500 mg will not respond to any intervention, and the middle group, 100-500 mg, can be treated with a variety of approaches, which are outlined. The standard treatment includes the use of ventriculolumbar washout, CSF exchange, or intravenous pharmacotherapy with leucovorin. Recently, the use of carboxypeptidase has been under investigation. All clinicians who administer intrathecal medications should be aware of these complications and the appropriate treatments of them (including rescue). Leucovorin should not be given intrathecally.

Errors involving pediatric patients receiving chemotherapy: a literature review

A review of mishaps involving pediatric patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy was undertaken in order to assist intervention. Although the case literature is too sparse to provide definite recommendations, suggestions for management are made in the event of an error with a high risk (based on the case literature) of life-threatening toxicities. It is recommended that all incidents be reported in the literature in order to provide a basis for devising standard treatment protocols. It is also suggested that studies using animal models continue to be done in order to provide more experimental data about toxicities and potentially beneficial rescue therapies.

Successful treatment of intrathecal methotrexate overdose by using ventriculolumbar perfusion and intrathecal instillation of carboxypeptidase G2

Prompt and appropriate management measures are critical in order to achieve a favorable outcome after a major overdose of intrathecally (IT) administered methotrexate (MTX). Published information available to guide clinicians in the immediate management of this medical emergency is scant. Herein we describe a 6-year-old boy with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who received an inadvertent overdose of 600 mg of IT administered MTX instead of the intended dose of 12 mg. Severe acute neurotoxicity developed rapidly. Lumbar puncture and drainage of 15 mL of cerebrospinal fluid 2 hours after administration resulted in removal of 32% of the administered drug. Ventriculolumbar perfusion with 240 mL of warmed isotonic saline through ventricular and lumbar catheters for 3 hours resulted in removal of a total of 90% of the drug within 8 1/2 hours after administration. IT administration of 2,000 U of carboxypeptidase G2 (CPDG2), an enzyme that inactivates MTX, resulted in a further 150-fold reduction in cerebrospinal fluid MTX concentration. The patient experienced complete recovery. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the use of IT instillation of CPDG2 for the treatment of an overdose of IT administered MTX in a human, and it is only the second reported favorable outcome after an IT overdose of more than 500 mg of MTX. Minor IT overdoses of MTX can be managed by immediate lumbar drainage alone. Major overdoses may also necessitate prompt ventriculolumbar perfusion, IT instillation of CPDG2, and further supportive measures for a successful outcome after this infrequent but potentially catastrophic event.