Body changes in adolescent patients with growth hormone receptor deficiency receiving recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue: preliminary results

rhIGF-1 Treatment Increases Bone Mineral Density and Trabecular Bone Structure in Children with PAPP-A2 Deficiency

AIM

Our objective was to determine changes in bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), and body composition after 2 years of therapy with recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-1 (rhIGF-1) in 2 prepubertal children with a complete lack of circulating PAPP-A2 due to a homozygous mutation in PAPP-A2 (p.D643fs25*) resulting in a premature stop codon.

METHODS

Body composition, BMD, and bone structure were determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 1 and 2 years of rhIGF-1 treatment.

RESULTS

Height increased from 132 to 145.5 cm (patient 1) and from 111.5 to 124.5 cm (patient 2). Bone mineral content increased from 933.40 to 1,057.97 and 1,152.77 g in patient 1, and from 696.12 to 773.26 and 911.51 g in patient 2, after 1 and 2 years, respectively. Whole-body BMD also increased after 2 years of rhIGF-1 from baseline 0.788 to 0.869 g/cm2 in patient 1 and from 0.763 to 0.829 g/cm2 in patient 2. After 2 years of treatment, both children had an improvement in TBS. During therapy, a slight increase in body fat mass was seen, with a concomitant increase in lean mass. No adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSION

Two years of rhIGF-1 improved growth, with a tendency to improve bone mass and bone microstructure and to modulate body composition.

Treatment of growth failure in the absence of GH signaling: The Ecuadorian experience

Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-1 (rhIGF-1) treatment studies of growth failure in absence of growth hormone (GH) signaling (GH insensitivity -GHI, Laron syndrome -LS, GH Receptor deficiency -GHRD) have taken place in many locations around the globe. Results from these trials are comparable, and slight differences reported can be attributed to specific circumstances at different research sites. rhIGF-I treatment studies of GHI in Ecuador included various trials performed on children belonging to the largest and only homogeneous cohort of subjects with this condition in the world. All trials were performed by the same team of investigators and, during study periods, subjects received similar nutritional, physical activity and medical advice. Combination of these inherent conditions most likely creates less sources of variability during the research process. Indeed, diagnosis, selection and inclusion of research subjects; methodology used; transport, storage and delivery of study drug; data collection, monitoring and auditing; data analysis, discussion of results, conclusion inferences and reporting, etc., were submitted to the same sources of error. For the above-mentioned reasons, we are hereby mainly covering conclusions derived from rhIGF-I treatment studies of Ecuadorian children whit GHRD due to homozygosity of a splice site mutation occurring at GHR gene, whose unaffected parents were both heterozygous for the same mutation. We also describe studies of rhIGF-I administration in adolescent and adult subjects with GHRD, from the same cohort and with the same genetic anomaly.

Recommended IGF-I dosage causes greater fat accumulation and osseous maturation than lower dosage and may compromise long-term growth effects

CONTEXT

The maximum dose of IGF-I recommended for treatment of GH insensitivity is commonly used.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to test the hypothesis that a lower dose is as effective as a high dose of IGF-I in growth promotion and has fewer deleterious effects.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Subjects were treated for 3 years with regular examinations including bone age and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and for 1 year with abdominal ultrasound studies at a clinical research institute in Quito, Ecuador.

SUBJECTS

The study included 21 subjects ages 3.2-15.9 years with GH insensitivity due to the same splice site mutation on the GH receptor gene.

INTERVENTIONS

Subjects were allocated to receive 120 (n = 14) or 80 (n = 7) μg/kg IGF-I twice daily.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Height velocity, osseous maturation, height SD scores (SDS), body composition, abdominal organ growth, and side effects were assessed.

RESULTS

There were no differences in growth velocity or height SDS increment by dosage, and the SDS increase was greater than in other reported series. Osseous maturation over 3 years with the high dose was nearly twice as rapid as with the lower dose (P < .001) and correlated with an increase in percentage body fat (r = .64; P < .001) and with adrenal size increase over 1 year (r = .32; P = .03). The ratio of bone age to height age was lower in the high-dose group after 3 years of treatment (P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

The commonly used IGF-I dosage of 120 μg/kg twice a day is excessive in comparison to a dose of 80 μg/kg twice a day, disproportionately accelerating osseous maturation, probably from the combined effects of obesity and inappropriate adrenal growth, thus likely compromising adult height potential. Moreover, the lower dose decreases direct treatment cost by one-third.

Insulin-like growth factor-I (rhIGF-I) therapy of short stature

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of subcutaneously injected rhIGF-I in late 2005 for treatment of children with severe short stature from growth hormone (GH) insensitivity due to genetic defects in the GH receptor or postreceptor mechanisms or from the development of GH inactivating antibodies. The approval was based on 15 years experience treating these rare conditions with rhIGF-I. Because of the very small numbers of children with these conditions, there has been an effort to justify and promote broader use for rhIGF-I. Attempts to identify GH unresponsiveness in children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) have yielded only a handful of patients with rare genetic disorders. IGF-I treatment for unequivocal GH insensitivity improves but does not correct growth failure, in contrast to the typical experience with GH replacement of GH deficiency. This emphasizes the importance of direct effects of GH at the growth plate, including the stimulation of maturation of cartilage precursor cells and local production of IGF-I, effects that cannot be duplicated by exogenous administration of rhIGF-I. Adverse effects testify to the more than adequate delivery of administered rhIGF-I to other tissues; these include lymphoid hyperplasia, coarsening of the facies, and increased percentage body fat. The absence of convincing evidence of GH insensitivity in a substantial number of children with ISS, the limited ability of endocrine IGF-I to restore normal growth in those with unequivocal GH unresponsiveness, the suppression of endogenous GH (and thereby, local GH effects on growth) that occurs with IGF-I administration, the risk profile, and the absence of data on efficacy in other than proven severe GH insensitivity, led the Drug and Therapeutics Committee of the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society to conclude that rhIGF-I use is only justified in conditions approved by the FDA and that other growth promotional use should only be investigational. Nonetheless, substantial numbers of children are being treated with rhIGF-I off-label, exuberant estimates of potentially eligible patients are projected, and several uncontrolled clinical trials have been undertaken which are not based on sound preliminary data or established growth principles, and a single four-arm study begun comparing monotherapy with rhGH to combination rhGH with three dosages of rhIGF-I as a single daily injection, a means of administration of rhIGF-I that has not been tested.

Final height in a patient with Laron syndrome after long-term therapy with rhlGF-I and short-term therapy with LHRH-analogue and oxandrolone during puberty

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience on long-term treatment with recombinant-human-IGF-I (rhIGF-I) of a female patient with Laron syndrome (mutation G223G in the GH receptor gene), who received short-term treatment (1 yr) with LHRH analogue at the start of puberty and subsequently with oxandrolone.

CASE REPORT

The patient started IGF-I therapy (dose 40 microg/kg bid for 9 months, 80 microg/kg bid until 13.7 yr of age and 120 microg/kg bid thereafter) when she was 7.6 yr old (height -6 sds), and was treated for 9.4 yr until final height (cm 129.7; -5.5 sds). At first signs of puberty (age 12.7 yr; height 116.3; -5.3 sds), LHRH analogue was started (3.75 mg/28 days) and bone age progressed by 6 months in the 12-month period. Growth velocity decreased in the 6-12th month of combined treatment (0.9 cm/6 months), and treatment was suspended. At age 14.8 (height 124.5; -6.6 sds), oxandrolone was added (0.1 mg/kg/day), but after 12 months (height 128 cm; -5.7 sds) bone age increased from 11.5 to 13.5 yr and the drug was stopped. No side effects occurred during the various treatments. Body segments progressed harmonically: there was a tendency towards improvement in the upper to lower body segment ratio and in cranial growth. Only biiliac diameter did not increase during LHRH treatment. During the 9-yr period, body mass index (BMI), subscapular and triceps skinfold centiles did not show any significant variations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our patient with Laron syndrome after long-term treatment showed a final result below the initial expectations, confirming that IGF-I used with the present schedule is less effective than GH in GH-deficient patients. LHRH analogue therapy at puberty was associated with a slower bone age maturation but with an almost complete arrest of growth. On the contrary, oxandrolone sustained growth but caused an excessive maturation of bone age. Other strategies are necessary to improve final height in these patients.

Bone density and body composition in children with growth hormone insensitivity syndrome receiving recombinant IGF-I

OBJECTIVE

There are few reports of the metabolic action of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) in vivo. Growth hormone insensitivity syndrome is a good model to examine the effects of IGF-I deficiency. This study was designed to assess body composition and bone density in children with growth hormone insensitivity syndrome before and after receiving treatment with recombinant IGF-I.

DESIGN

A prospective longitudinal study.

PATIENTS

Four prepubertal boys age 6.1-9.8 years with short stature due to growth hormone insensitivity syndrome.

MEASUREMENTS

Assessment of body fat by skinfold thickness measurements and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was made during the first 6 months of recombinant IGF-I treatment. Assessment of lumbar spine bone density by DXA was performed prior to IGF-I treatment and during the subsequent five years.

RESULTS

Each child showed a significant reduction in fat mass (0.26-1.22 kg) after 6 weeks of IGF-I treatment. Bone density prior to treatment was reduced in comparison to age-matched controls but calculated volumetric bone density was within the normal range. Volumetric bone density progressively improved over the 5-year treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with growth hormone insensitivity syndrome exhibit a metabolic response to IGF-I within 6 weeks analogous to that seen in GH-deficient children receiving GH. Bone density when corrected for body size is within normal limits and demonstrates a response to IGF-I, confirming the anabolic action on bone.

Growth in growth hormone insensitivity

Primary GH insensitivity due to GH receptor deficiency (GHRD) provides a model for studying the discrete effects of severe IGF-I deficiency on growth and body composition. Growth failure in utero is doubtful, but postpartum growth proceeds at rates that result in adult statures 4-12 standard deviations (SDs) below the normal mean. Wide variability in statural effect, even in a genetically homogeneous population, is partly explained by correlation of SD score with biochemical measures of GH effect (IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3). Growth and changes in body composition (decreased fat/lean) in patients with GHRD in response to exogenous IGF-I indicate that direct local effects of GH are not necessary for these responses.