Levels of SP-A-anti-SP-A immune complexes in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome correlate with subsequent development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Pulmonary Collectins in Diagnosis and Prevention of Lung Diseases

Pulmonary surfactant is a complex mixture of lipids and proteins, and is synthesized and secreted by alveolar type II epithelial cells and bronchiolar Clara cells. It acts to keep alveoli from collapsing during the expiratory phase of the respiratory cycle. After its secretion, lung surfactant forms a lattice structure on the alveolar surface, known as tubular myelin. Surfactant proteins (SP)-A, B, C and D make up to 10% of the total surfactant. SP-B and SPC are relatively small hydrophobic proteins, and are involved in the reduction of surface-tension at the air-liquid interface. SP-A and SP-D, on the other hand, are large oligomeric, hydrophilic proteins that belong to the collagenous Ca²⁺-dependent C-type lectin family (known as “Collectins”), and play an important role in host defense and in the recycling and transport of lung surfactant (Awasthi 2010) (Fig. 43.1). In particular, there is increasing evidence that surfactant-associated proteins A and -D (SP-A and SP-D, respectively) contribute to the host defense against inhaled microorganisms (see 10.1007/978-3-7091-1065_24 and 10.1007/978-3-7091-1065_25). Based on their ability to recognize pathogens and to regulate the host defense, SP-A and SP-D have been recently categorized as “Secretory Pathogen Recognition Receptors”. While SP-A and SP-D were first identified in the lung; the expression of these proteins has also been observed at other mucosal surfaces, such as lacrimal glands, gastrointestinal mucosa, genitourinary epithelium and periodontal surfaces. SP-A is the most prominent among four proteins in the pulmonary surfactant-system. The expression of SP-A is complexly regulated on the transcriptional and the chromosomal level. SP-A is a major player in the pulmonary cytokine-network and moreover has been described to act in the pulmonary host defense. This chapter gives an overview on the understanding of role of SP-A and SP-D in for human pulmonary disorders and points out the importance for pathology-orientated research to further elucidate the role of these molecules in adult lung diseases. As an outlook, it will become an issue of pulmonary pathology which might provide promising perspectives for applications in research, diagnosis and therapy (Awasthi 2010).

The present status of exogenous surfactant for the newborn

This year is the 20th anniversary of the first successful trial of exogenous surfactant for respiratory distress syndrome in the newborn and it is perhaps a good time to review recent advances in basic science and clinical practice as they relate to surfactant therapy.

KL-6, a mucinous glycoprotein, as an indicator of chronic lung disease of the newborn

KL-6 is a mucinous glycoprotein that is preferentially expressed by alveolar type 2 cells. Plasma KL-6 was higher in infants with chronic lung disease (n = 12) than in infants without chronic lung disease (n = 14) on day 0-1, 10, and 30 (P =.04). KL-6 correlated with the alveolar-arterial oxygen tension difference on day 10 and day 30. Plasma KL-6 may be useful as an early marker of chronic lung disease and an indicator of severity.

Calfactant: a review of its use in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

Calfactant (Infasurt) is a natural bovine surfactant which has been evaluated for intratracheal use in the prevention and rescue treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants. In 2 randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trials of prophylactic use, calfactant 100 or 105 mg phospholipid per kg bodyweight (mg/kg) reduced RDS incidence, RDS severity and mortality rates to a greater extent than colfosceril palmitate (Exosurf Neonatal) 67.5 mg/kg and was generally similar to beractant (Survanta) 100 mg/kg. Although the rate of mortality before discharge from hospital was significantly higher in infants with birthweights <600 g who received calfactant than in those who received beractant, this may not be a typical result. As rescue treatment, calfactant 100 or 105 mg/kg reduced RDS severity, but not mortality rates, significantly more than colfosceril palmitate 67.5 mg/kg or beractant 100 mg/kg in 2 randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trials. In addition, the duration of effect of calfactant as prophylaxis or rescue treatment appeared to be longer than that of beractant. In other randomised trials, prophylaxis was more effective than rescue treatment with calfactant, particularly in infants of < or =29 weeks gestational age. The incidence of pulmonary air leak events was lower with calfactant than with colfosceril palmitate (12 vs 22%) but was identical with calfactant and beractant (15% with either agent). The incidence of other complications associated with RDS was usually similar with all 3 agents in clinical trials in preterm infants. The incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage was significantly higher in 1 clinical trial, and that of septicaemia was significantly lower in another, with calfactant versus colfosceril palmitate, but the combined incidences of these complications was similar with the 2 agents when results from different trials were pooled. The incidence of acute adverse events (i.e. those which occurred during administration of the drug) with calfactant was similar to that with beractant and higher than that with colfosceril palmitate; the difference may been related to reduced RDS severity in calfactant versus colfosceril palmitate recipients. Acute adverse events were usually transient and not severe.

CONCLUSIONS

Calfactant is a well tolerated natural bovine surfactant which is effective in the prevention and treatment of RDS in preterm infants. Further investigation is needed to more clearly determine the efficacy and tolerability of calfactant relative to that of other surfactant preparations. When more data are available, it is likely that calfactant will be useful as an alternative to beractant (at least in infants of birthweights >600 g), and calfactant may be preferred over colfosceril palmitate in both the prophylaxis and treatment of RDS.

A risk-benefit assessment of natural and synthetic exogenous surfactants in the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome

Alveolar surfactant is central to pulmonary physiology. Quantitative and qualitative surfactant abnormalities appear to be the primary aetiological factors in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and exogenous replacement of surfactant is a rational treatment. Available exogenous surfactants have a natural (mammal-derived lung surfactants) or synthetic origin. Pharmacodynamic and clinical studies have demonstrated that exogenous surfactants immediately improve pulmonary distensibility and gas exchange; however, this is achieved more slowly and with more failures with synthetic surfactants. The ensuing advantageous haemodynamic effects are not so striking and they include an inconvenient increased left to right ductal shunt. Two strategies of administration have been used: prophylactic or rescue therapy to treat declared RDS. All methods of instillation require intubation. In addition to the early benefits (improved gas exchange and reduced ventilatory support) the incidence of classical complications of RDS, especially air leak events, is decreased except for the uncommon problem of pulmonary haemorrhage. The incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia is neither uniformly nor significantly reduced although the severity appears to be lessened. The overall incidence of peri-intraventricular haemorrhages is not diminished although separate trials have shown a decreased rate. The most striking beneficial effect of exogenous surfactants is the increased survival (of about 40%) of treated very low birthweight neonates. A small number of adverse effects has been described. The long term outcome of survivor neonates with RDS treated with surfactants versus control neonates with RDS not treated with surfactants is similar in terms of physical growth, at least as good in terms of respiratory status, with a similar or slightly better neurodevelopmental outcome. There is not clear benefit of exogenous surfactant therapy in extremely premature infants (< 26 weeks gestational age, birthweight < 750 g). The potential risks of contamination, inflammatory and immunogenic reaction and the inhalation of platelet activating factor remain a theoretical concern of surfactant therapy which has not been confirmed in clinical practice. The optimal timing of treatment favours prophylaxis over rescue treatment and early rescue treatment rather than delayed therapy. Meta-analyses suggest the clinical superiority of natural surfactant extracts over a synthetic one (colfosceril palmitate). The economic impact of surfactant therapy is favourable and the costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for surviving surfactant treated infants are low. In conclusion, the mid and long term benefit/risk ratio clearly favours the use of exogenous surfactants to prevent or to treat RDS in neonates who have a gestational age of > 26 weeks or a birthweight of > 750 g, especially with the prophylactic strategy using natural surfactant extracts.

Synthetic or natural surfactants

Surfactant replacement therapy is one of the most studied interventions in neonatal medicine, with many thousands of infants having been enrolled in randomized clinical trials. It is clear that surfactant therapy reduces neonatal mortality and the risk of pulmonary air leaks in babies with or at risk of developing respiratory distress syndrome. Yet some doubts linger over other aspects of this therapy, despite it having been an acceptable and proven therapy for the past 7-10 years. As regards timing of treatment, the earlier the better, with true prophylaxis being reserved for babies of less than 28 week's gestation. Natural surfactant preparations containing surfactant proteins B and C act more rapidly than their synthetic protein-free counterparts and probably also have a greater impact on reducing neonatal mortality and pulmonary air leaks. Fears raised about immunological effects, prion transmission and chemical contamination of natural surfactants have not been substantiated. Long-term follow-up studies do not show any differences in outcome between treated and non-treated infants, except that the incidence and severity of retinopathy of prematurity might be reduced by treatment with natural surfactant. Further research is needed and this will include more detailed follow-up studies, newer indications for surfactant therapy and the testing of newer preparations with synthetic peptides or protein analogues added.