Reliability of Circumferential Bone Level Assessment around Single Implants in Healed Ridges and Extraction Sockets Using Cone Beam CT

Effect of different implant positions for two implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a retrospective 5-years radiographic evaluation of the circumferential peri-implant bone loss and posterior ridge resorptive changes

BACKGROUND

Studies did not recommend which position for implant overdenture poses the lowest biomechanical risk and the least chance of peri-implant bone loss and ridge resorption for those who might need a mandibular two-implant overdenture. The study objectives were to investigate the impact of implant position, in lateral incisors or canine positions, on peri-implant bone loss and posterior ridge resorption.

METHODS

Fifty patients with mandibular two-implants were recalled and divided according to the implant position into two groups (group L: implants in lateral incisor positions and group C: implants in canine positions). The circumferential peri-implant bone level and posterior ridge resorption were assessed at implant insertion (T0), one year later (T1), and five years later (T5) using the follow-up CBCT. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) program. A Mann-Whitney test was used to compare two different groups. Paired groups were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The threshold of significance is fixed at a 5% level (p-value).

RESULTS

Significant differences in the vertical bone loss between groups appeared at (T5 - T1) (Mann Whitney test, (P = 0.01)) and at (T5 - T0) (Mann Whitney test, (P = 0.005)), and a significant difference in horizontal bone loss between groups was found at (T1 - T0) (Mann Whitney test, (P = 0.041)) and (T5 - T1) (Mann Whitney test, (P = 0.041)). Also, there were significant differences over the evaluation period between groups at certain points along the ridge at M1 (Mann Whitney test, (P = 0.021)), M3 (Mann Whitney test, (P = 0.008)), and M4 (Mann Whitney test, (P = 0.015)).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the findings of this clinical study, the placement of implants in the lateral incisor position for two implant-retained overdentures is a viable choice. In comparison to the canine position, the lateral incisor position demonstrated superior peri-implant responses, which could potentially enhance the longevity of the implants. Furthermore, the placement of implants in the lateral incisor position can promote a more even distribution of stress and help mitigate posterior ridge resorption. Conversely, implants in the canine position may cause a seesaw effect and result in greater posterior ridge resorption.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER

(NCT06055842) (13/03/2024).

Five years of radiographic evaluation for the peri-implant bone changes of all-on-four implant prostheses constructed from different framework materials using different digital construction techniques

BACKGROUND

There is insufficient evidence recommending a framework material and a CAD/CAM manufacturing technique for mandibular implant-supported prostheses. The study objective was to evaluate the clinical application of different materials and construction techniques used for mandibular All-on-4 prosthesis on circumferential peri-implant bony changes after 5 years.

METHODS

Thirty-six male patients with all-on-4 mandibular implant-supported prostheses were recalled and divided into three groups. Group PK (patients with frameworks milled from PEEK blocks), Group PSM (patients with frameworks milled from soft metal blocks), and Group SLM (patients with frameworks constructed with additive manufacturing; selective laser melting). The circumferential bone level on all implant faces was assessed with a CBCT. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare vertical bone loss (VBL) and horizontal bone loss (HBL) between different groups, implant positions, and observation times followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

For all observation times, there was a significant difference in VBL between groups for both anterior and posterior implants (P < .001). For anterior implants, group PSM showed the lowest VBL while group PK showed the highest for anterior and posterior implants. For all groups, HBL significantly increased after 5 years for both anterior and posterior implants (P < .001). For anterior implants, group PSM showed the highest HBL. For posterior implants, group PK and SLM showed the highest.

CONCLUSION

Within the study's limitations, mandibular implant-supported fixed frameworks fabricated with either milling from PEEK or soft metal blocks, or additive manufacturing (laser melting technology) exhibited significant vertical and horizontal bone height changes after 5 years.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER

(NCT06071689) (11/10/2023).

Effect of a metal artifact reduction algorithm on dehiscence and fenestration detection around zirconia implants with cone beam computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of the metal artifact reduction algorithm (MARA) of the Cranex 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device in the detection of peri-implant dehiscence and fenestration around zirconia implants.

STUDY DESIGN

In total, 60 implants were placed in bovine ribs. Dehiscence and fenestration defects were created around the implants, after which 60 CBCT images were obtained with and 60 without activation of MARA. Three radiologists examined the images for the presence of defects. The area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic analysis, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to assess the ability to discriminate the presence vs absence of bone defects. One-way analysis of variance was employed to analyze outcome measures. The significance level was established at 5% (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

AUC values indicated excellent discrimination of dehiscence on images with MARA activation and an excellent to outstanding range of discrimination with MARA deactivation. For fenestration, MARA activation and deactivation both led to outstanding discrimination. Sensitivity and specificity values revealed that activation of MARA was helpful in distinguishing the presence vs. absence of dehiscence, while both MARA conditions were helpful for fenestration. However, there were no statistically significant differences between MARA activation and deactivation for any outcome measure (P >.05).

CONCLUSION

CBCT is suitable for detecting peri-implant defects, but MARA application does not significantly affect peri-implant dehiscence and fenestration detection.

Accuracy of implant height and width measurement with triaxial rotation method based on cone-beam CT

Objective

To investigate the accuracy of implant height and width measurement in the mandibular and maxillary first molar region based on cone-beam CT (CBCT) data, and to establish an accurate method for bone measurement in the implant region.

Materials and methods

CBCT images of 122 patients with implant in mandibular or maxillary first molar region were retrospectively collected. Two methods were used to measure sagittal height (SH), coronal height (CH), sagittal width (SW), and coronal width (CW) of implants. Method 1 (general method): the images were analyzed using the built-in software NNT 9.0 software. SHl, CHl, SWl, and CWl were measured on the reconstructed sagittal and coronal based on the radiologist's own experience. Method 2 (triaxial rotation method): the raw data were demonstrated in Expert mode of NNT 9.0 software, in which the coronal axis and sagittal axis were rotated paralleling to the long axis of the implant for reconstruction, and then SH2, CH2, SW2, and CW2 were measured on the reconstructed sagittal and coronal images. The results of two methods were compared with the actual implant size (H0, W0). Paired T-test was performed for statistical analysis. Dahlberg formula was used to check the measurement error.

Results

For method 1, there was no significant differences between SHl and H0 (P > 0.05), but significant differences between CHl and H0, SWl and W0, and CWl and W0 (P < 0.05). For method 2, there were no significant differences between all measurements and actual size (P > 0.05). The random error range measured using Dahlberg formula was 0.157-1.171 mm for general method and 0.017-0.05 mm for triaxial rotation method.

Conclusion

The triaxial rotation method is accurate for implant height and width measurements on CBCT images and could be used in pre-operatively bone height and width measurement of potential implant sites.

Assessment of implant stability with resonance frequency analysis and changes in the thickness of keratinized tissue and crestal bone level using cone-beam computed tomography in two-stage implants: A three-dimensional clinicoradiographic study

Background

The present study aims to evaluate a three-dimensional (3D) changes in the crestal bone levels (buccally, lingually/palatally, mesially, and distally) and in the thickness of keratinized tissue around single or multiple implants using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) after 1 year.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-eight implants were placed in the posterior load-bearing areas in 10 patients. The crestal bone levels and the thickness of keratinized tissue surrounding the edentulous area were assessed preoperatively, immediately after implant placement, and 1 year after implant placement using CBCT (3D imaging technique with DICOM software (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY)). Implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured immediately after implant placement using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) (Penguin RFA Monitor Osseointegration, Integration Diagnostics Sweden AB, Furstenbergsgatan 4 416 64 Göteborg, Sweden).

Results

The average crestal bone loss around the implants after 1 year was 0.78 ± 0.26 mm on the buccal side, 0.63 ± 0.27 mm on the lingual side, 0.57 ± 0.18 mm on the mesial side, and 0.53 ± 0.28 mm on the distal side. The average amount of bone loss including all sites was 0.63 ± 0.17 mm and the mean change in keratinized tissue thickness after 1 year was 0.3 ± 0.19 mm. The RFA ranged from 75 to 82 Nm for all the implants immediately after placement.

Conclusion

CBCT can be used as a reliable source, as it is compararively more superior and precise than intraoral periapical radiographs in measuring the changes in the bone and thickness of the keratinized tissue before and after implant placement. A thick biotype of the keratinized tissue is as important as the bone topography for the success of the implant. ISQ measurements immediately after implant placement can also act as a major factor in depicting the success of the implant in the future.

Is cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) an alternative to plain radiography in assessments of dental disease? A study of method agreement in a medically compromised patient population

OBJECTIVES

Poor oral health and dental infections can jeopardize medical treatment and be life-threatening. Due to this, patients with head and neck malignancies, generalized tumor spread, organ transplant, or severe infection are referred for a clinical oral and radiographic examination. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic agreement of three radiographic modalities: intraoral radiographs (IO), panoramic radiographs (PX), and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for diagnosis of dental diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred patients were examined with IO, PX, and CBCT. Periapical lesions, marginal bone level, and caries lesions were diagnosed separately by four oral radiologists. All observers also assessed six teeth in 30 randomly selected patients at two different occasions. Kappa values and percent agreement were calculated.

RESULTS

The highest Kappa value and percent agreement were for diagnosing periapical lesions (0.76, 97.7%), and for the assessment of marginal bone level, it varied between 0.58 and 0.60 (87.8-89.3%). In CBCT, only 44.4% of all teeth were assessable for caries (Kappa 0.68, 93.4%). The intra-observer agreement, for all modalities and diagnoses, showed Kappa values between 0.5 and 0.93 and inter-observer agreement varied from 0.51 to 0.87.

CONCLUSIONS

CBCT was an alternative to IO in diagnosing periapical lesions. Both modalities found the same healthy teeth in 93.8%. All modalities were performed equally regarding marginal bone level. In caries diagnosis, artifacts were the major cause of fallout for CBCT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Intraoral radiography is the first-hand choice for diagnosing dental disease. For some rare cases where intraoral imaging is not possible, a dedicated panoramic image and/or CBCT examination is an alternative.

Comparison between Two Design Concepts of Four Implants Placement Used to Support Telescopic Mandibular Overdenture: A Prospective Study of Implant Marginal Bone Height Changes

AIM

The aim of this present study was to compare two placement designs of four implants used to support a telescopic mandibular overdenture regarding the marginal bone height changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Each patient received four implants. Two anterior implants were installed vertically in the canine area. Patients were randomized into two groups according to the direction of posterior implants installed in the premolar area. Group I: where the implants were installed vertically parallel to the anterior implants and group II: where the implants were installed 30^º distally. The implants were delayed loaded with a telescopic mandibular overdenture. The implant's marginal bone changes were evaluated after 6 and 12 months of overdenture insertion.

RESULTS

Mean marginal bone loss of anterior implants showed a statistically significant difference between both groups. The vertically parallel posterior implants in group I showed statistically significant higher marginal bone loss than posterior implants in group II after follow-up periods. The 30^º distally tilted posterior implants maintained the implant marginal bone after 12 months of overdenture insertion.

CONCLUSION

Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with telescopic overdenture supported by four parallel implants is a promising successful treatment option.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Tilting the posterior implants will improve the anteroposterior spread that in turn increases the support and the survival rate of the implants. Also, using this technique gives us an opportunity to use fewer implants.

Comparative Evaluation of the Crestal Bone Level Around Pre- and Post-loaded Immediate Endoosseous Implants Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Clinico-Radiographic Study

Introduction  Dental implants replace missing teeth. Dental implants are surgically placed tooth root replacements that secure prosthetic teeth and bridges. Branemark's original dental implant technique included a mesiobuccal flap and a two-stage approach, needing 6-8 months of recovery following extraction, sterile conditions, machined titanium implants, 3-6 months without stress for osseointegration, and a detachable temporary prosthesis. The restoration would usually be ready a year following the implant surgery. Implant treatment seeks the best function, aesthetics, and complication risk. Implant therapy with low patient morbidity and fast extraction-to-restoration times is a secondary target. Instantaneous implant insertion has made implant dentistry more convenient for patients and clinicians. This study measures bone height before, after, and one month after implant placement using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods Participants were selected from oral evaluation candidates. This investigation included 11 people missing front maxillary or mandibular teeth or root components. Diagnostic castings determined the interarch connection before surgery. Alginate maxillary and mandibular arch imprints were cast in Type III dental stone for diagnosis. CBCT scans were taken pre-operatively, post-implant, and post-prosthesis. After the tooth was removed, the empty socket was cleaned up with curettes. An intraoral periapical radiograph and manual probing were done to determine the implant's size. The implant was removed for examination after three months, and healing abutments and gingival formers were placed. Finally, fins were placed. The CBCT images also captured the bone height around the implants. The soft tissue parameters were recorded and evaluated at baseline and one-month following prosthetic loading as plaque index (PI). Radiographic evaluation was done at baseline and one-month following functional loading using CBCT. After one month following functional loading, crestal bone levels were measured again with the help of CBCT using Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, US). Results The sample population had an average age of 42.81 years, with a standard deviation of 13.44 years. Using a paired t-test, we found that the mean PI dropped significantly from pre-loading levels to one-month post-loading levels, with a p-value of less than 0.001. The mean crestal bone level (mesial) evaluated by CBCT at baseline and one-month post-loading was 2.52 ± 1.97 mm and 1.17 ± 1.31 mm, respectively. The mean difference between mean crestal bone loss (distal) at baseline and one-month post-loading was 0.94 ± 1.89 mm, which was not statistically significant. The mean difference between mean crestal bone loss (buccal) at baseline and one-month post-loading was 1.82 ± 1.60 mm, which was statistically significant. The mean difference between mean crestal bone loss (lingual) at baseline and one-month post-loading was 1.91 ± 1.53 which was statistically significant. Conclusion CBCT provides all the diagnostic data needed for implant placement; hence, it is recommended.

Peri-implant tissue health and patient satisfaction of vertical versus inclined posterior implants used to support overdentures with bar attachments. A one-year randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate peri-implant tissue health and patient satisfaction of vertical and inclined posterior implants for mandibular bar overdentures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty edentulous participants received four implants in the interforaminal area of the mandible. The patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups; (1) vertical group (control): all implants were inserted vertically parallel to each other. Inclined group (study): the anterior implants were placed vertically, and the posterior implants were tilted 30° distally. Hader bar attachment with two 7 mm-distal cantilevers (vertical group) and without cantilevers (inclined group) was used to connect the implants to mandibular overdentures. Peri-implant tissue health (Plaque [PL] and gingival [GI] indices, pocket depth [PD], and crestal bone loss [CBL]) were evaluated after denture insertion (T0), 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) months after insertion. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analog scale after 12 months.

RESULTS

At T12, the vertical group showed significantly higher PL, PD, and CBL than the inclined group for anterior (p < 0.037) and posterior (p < 0.017) implants. The vertical group showed significantly higher GI than the inclined group for anterior implants (p = 0.003), and the inclined group showed significantly higher GI than the vertical group for posterior implants (p = 0.016). The inclined group showed significantly higher scores for general satisfaction (p = 0.049), prosthesis as a part of you (p = 0.013), appearance (p < 0.001), stability (p = 0.002), ease of cleaning (p < 0.001), and comfort (p = 0.001) than the vertical group.

CONCLUSION

Inclined posterior implants used to support mandibular bar overdentures are recommended than vertical implants, as it was associated with improved patient satisfaction and peri-implant tissue health.

Is There a Better Biomaterial for Dental Implants than Titanium?—A Review and Meta-Study Analysis

This article focuses on preclinical studies and reviews the available evidence from the literature on dental implant and abutment materials in the last decade. Specifically, different peri-implantitis materials and how surface modifications may affect the peri-implant soft-tissue seal and subsequently delay or hinder peri-implantitis are examined. This review analyzed more than 30 studies that were Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), Controlled Clinical Trials (CCTs), or prospective case series (CS) with at least six months of follow-up. Meta-analyses were performed to make a comparison between different implant materials (titanium vs. zirconia), including impact on bone changes, probing depth, plaque levels, and peri-implant mucosal inflammation, as well as how the properties of the implant material and surface modifications would affect the peri-implant soft-tissue seal and peri-implant health conditions. However, there was no clear evidence regarding whether titanium is better than other implant materials. Clinical evidence suggests no difference between different implant materials in peri-implant bone stability. The metal analysis offered a statistically significant advantage of zirconia implants over titanium regarding developing a favorable response to the alveolar bone.

Using Different Low-Profile Abutments for Assisting Mandibular Implant Overdenture: A Split-Mouth Study

Background

Using a pair of different low-profile abutments to assist mandibular implant overdenture (MIOD) in limited restorative space is questionable due to the different morphology.

Objective

To investigate the marginal bone level (MBL) change and peri-implant-tissue health (PITH) around a pair of OT Equator^® and Locator^® suprastructures assisting MIOD.

Methods

Seventeen edentulous patients received MIOD assisted by OT Equator^® and Locator^®. MBL change was investigated at the implant loading (T1), after six months (T2) and twelve months (T3) of implant loading. PITH was evaluated at T2 and T3.

Results

There was within abutment significant difference in MBL change after T2 and T3 of loading for Locator (0.05 ± 0.02 and 0.32 ± 0.08, respectively) (P=0.01); and for Equator (0.11 ± 0.08 and 0.21 ± 0.09, respectively) (P=0.01). Also, there was a significant difference between Locator and Equator on the modified plaque index (MPI) after T3 (P=0.01). The significant results were recorded for the MPI at T2 and T3 for Locator (0.92 ± 0.26 and 1.5 ± 0.51, respectively) (P=0.01) and for Equator (0.82 ± 0.26 and 1.42 ± 0.51, respectively) (P=0.003). For modified bleeding index, there was significant difference at T2 and T3 for Locator (0.57 ± 0.19 and 1.14 ± 0.41, respectively) (P=0.03) and for Equator (0.46 ± 0.22 and 1.07 ± 0.41, respectively) (P=0.01). For gingival index, there was significant difference at T2 and T3 for Locator (0.57 ± 0.11 and 1.28 ± 0.35, respectively) (P=0.001) and for Equator (0.35 ± 0.21 and 1.1 ± 0.46, respectively) (P=0.001).

Conclusions

Using different pairs of the low-profile OT Equator^® and Locator^® abutments to assist MIOD is clinically acceptable based on the MBL change and PITH outcomes.

Accuracy of bone level assessments following reconstructive surgical treatment of experimental peri-implantitis

AIMS

The purpose was to evaluate the accuracy of bone level assessments using either cone beam computed tomography, intraoral periapical radiographs or histology following reconstructive treatment of experimental peri-implantitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six Labrador dogs were used. Experimental peri-implantitis was induced 3 months after implant placement. Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis was performed and peri-implant defects were allocated to one of four treatment categories; no augmentation, bone graft materials with or without a barrier membrane. Six months later, intraoral periapical radiographs and block biopsies from all implants sites were obtained. Marginal bone levels were measured using periapical radiographs, CBCT and histology.

RESULTS

Significant correlations of MBL assessments were observed between the three methods. The measurements in periapical radiographs consistently resulted in an overestimation of the bone level of about 0.3 - 0.4 mm. The agreement between methods was not influenced by the use of bone substitute materials in the management of the osseous defects.

CONCLUSIONS

Although MBL assessments obtained from PA radiographs showed an overestimation compared to MBL assessments on corresponding CBCT images and histological sections, PA radiographs can be considered a reliable technique for peri-implant bone level evaluations following reconstructive surgical therapy of experimental peri-implantitis.

Circumferential bone level and bone remodeling in the posterior mandible of edentulous mandibular overdenture wearers: influence of mandibular bone atrophy in a 3-year cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate circumferential bone level and morphological alterations in the posterior mandibular ridge of atrophic (AP) and non-atrophic (NAP) patients using implant-retained mandibular overdentures (MO) over 3 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six edentulous patients categorized according to mandibular atrophy (AP = 13/NAP = 13) received two narrow diameter implants (Facility, 2.9 × 10 mm) in the anterior region of mandible. The vertical and horizontal bone level was measured along with bone remodeling at 4 distances from the mental foramen in the posterior region of the mandible (L1-L4) via CBCT.

RESULTS

NAP showed significantly higher total height and medullary height in all posterior regions at 1 and 3 years (p ≤ 0.01). Cortical height and width were significantly higher (p ≤ 0.05) in this group at distances L1 and L4, respectively, in year 1. NAP shows a significantly higher % of medullary height at distances L1 (p ≤ 0.05), L2 (p ≤ 0.01), and L3 (p ≤ 0.05) after 1 year, and at all distances (p ≤ 0.05) after 3 years. Bone remodeling in the groups differed significantly (p ≤ 0.05) in terms of cortical width and % medullary width at L3.

CONCLUSION

AP and NAP showed similar vertical and horizontal bone level. Bone resorption in the posterior ridge was stabilized by MO over 3 years; however, AP are more susceptible to the long-term substitution of medullary bone by cortical bone.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study is the first to longitudinally evaluate bone dimensions in atrophic and non-atrophic two-implant MO users by CBCT and revealed that MO is a predictable treatment based on the stabilization of the posterior bone resorption.

Is ridge preservation effective in the extraction sockets of periodontally compromised teeth? A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To verify whether ridge preservation is effective in the reduction of dimensional loss and in bone formation compared to spontaneous healing in extraction sockets of periodontally compromised teeth.

METHODS

Twenty-six subjects requiring tooth extraction for stage III/IV periodontitis were randomly assigned to one of two interventions: alveolar ridge preservation using collagenated bovine bone mineral and a resorbable collagen membrane (test, RP) or spontaneous healing (control, SH). Six months later, postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed to measure the linear and volumetric changes of the sockets compared to baseline scans. Biopsies were retrieved at the implant site for histomorphometric calculations. Nonparametric tests were applied for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Significantly less shrinkage occurred in RP compared to SH, mainly in the crestal zone. The width loss difference between groups was 3.3 mm and 2.2 mm at 1 mm and 3 mm below the crest, respectively (p < .05). RP yielded a gain in socket height of 0.25 mm, whereas a loss of -0.39 mm was observed in SH (p < .05). The percentage of volume loss recorded in RP was also less than that recorded in SH (-26.53% vs -50.34, p < .05). Significantly less bone proportion was detected in biopsies from RP (30.1%) compared with SH (53.9%). A positive association between baseline bone loss and ridge shrinkage was found in SH but not in RP.

CONCLUSION

Ridge preservation in extraction sockets of periodontally compromised teeth was effective in reducing the amount of ridge resorption.

An evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss according to implant type, surgical technique and prosthetic rehabilitation: a retrospective multicentre and cross-sectional cohort study

To evaluate implant loss (IL) and marginal bone loss (MBL); follow-up period of up to 10 years after prosthetic loading. Retrospective multi-centre cross-sectional cohort study. Double analysis: (1) all the implants (n = 456) were analysed; (2) to allow for possible cluster error, one implant per patient (n = 143) was selected randomly. Statistical analysis: Spearman's correlation coefficient; Kruskal-Wallis (post-hoc U-Mann-Whitney); Chi-square (post-hoc Haberman). (1) Analysing all the implants (456): IL was observed in patients with past periodontitis (6 vs. 2.2%, p < 0.05), short implants (12 vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001) and when using regenerative surgery (11.3 vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001); greater MBL was observed among smokers (0.39 ± 0.52 vs. 0.2 ± 0.29, p < 0.01), maxillary implants (0.28 ± 0.37 vs. 0.1 ± 0.17, p < 0.0001), anterior region implants (0.32 ± 0.36 vs. 0.21 ± 0.33, p < 0.001), external connection implants (0.2 ± 0.29 vs. 0.63 ± 0.59, p < 0.0001), and 2-3 years after loading (p < 0.0001). (2) analysing the cluster (143): IL was observed in smokers (18.8 vs. 3.5%, p < 0.05), splinted fixed crowns (12.9%, p < 0.01), short implants (22.2 vs. 4.0%, p < 0.01) and when using regenerative surgery (19.2 vs. 3.4%, p < 0.01); greater MBL was observed in maxillary implants (0.25 ± 0.35 vs. 0.11 ± 0.18, p < 0.05), in the anterior region (p < 0.05), in the first 3 years (p < 0.01), in external connection implants (0.72 ± 0.71 vs. 0.19 ± 0.26, p < 0.01) and in short implants (0.38 ± 0.31 vs. 0.2 ± 0.32, p < 0.05). There is greater risk in smokers, patients with past periodontal disease, external connection implants, the use of short implants and when regenerative techniques are used. To prevent MBL and IL, implantologists should be very meticulous in indicating implants in patients affected by these host factors.

Intra- and inter-observer agreements in detecting peri-implant bone defects between periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography: A clinical study

Background/purpose

Information regarding agreements between periapical radiograph (PA) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in detecting peri-implant defect is still scarce. The aim of this clinical study was to compare agreements between PA and CBCT in detecting peri-implant bone defect.

Materials and methods

This retrospective clinical study enrolled 32 patients with both PA and CBCT filmed right after implant placement. Four modalities were used for film reading: PA1 (original), PA2 (enhanced brightness/contrast), CBCT1 (selected axial and mesial-distal direction images) and CBCT2 (all data with software). 2 experienced and 2 inexperienced observers scored all films. Intra- and inter-observer agreements were estimated with Cohen's kappa coefficient. Categorized agreements were compared and differences among four modalities were calculated.

Results

Agreements of PA were better than CBCT when detecting peri-implant bone defects in inter-observer agreements (median kappa 0.471 vs. 0.192; p = 0.016). Moreover, agreements in experienced observers were better than inexperienced observers (median kappa 0.883 vs. 0.567; p < 0.001). There was significant difference among four modalities except for experienced observer 2 (p = 0.218).

Conclusion

Agreements of PA are better than CBCT when detecting peri-implant bone defects, especially for inter-observer agreements. Experienced observers are more consistent in assessment than inexperienced ones.

CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: an anatomic study

OBJECTIVE

The site of the sinus tract depends on the rate of resistance against abscess exudate drainage, bone morphology, and distance from the root apex to the outer cortical bone. To assess apical bone thickness in buccal and palatal/lingual aspects of maxillary and mandibular teeth, using a high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system.

METHODOLOGY

In total, 422 CBCT examinations were included in the study, resulting in a sample of 1400 teeth. The scans were acquired by PreXion 3D, with a high-resolution protocol. The bone thickness was taken as the distance between the center of the apical foramen and the buccal and lingual/palatal cortical bone. The quantitative variables were expressed as mean values±standard deviation. The independent samples were analyzed using the t-test or the Mann-Whitney test (p<0.05).

RESULTS

The lowest mean value of bone thickness was observed in the buccal cortical bone of the upper canines (1.49 mm±0.86) and in the upper central incisors (1.59 mm±0.67). In premolar teeth, the lowest values were found in the buccal cortical bone of upper first premolars (1.13 mm±0.68). In the posterior teeth, the lowest values were found in the buccal cortical bone of upper first molars (1.98 mm±1.33). In the lower second molar region, the buccal cortical bone (8.36 mm±1.84) was thicker than the lingual cortical bone (2.95 mm±1.16) (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The lowest mean values of bone thickness are in the buccal cortical bone of the maxillary teeth. In the mandible, bone thickness is thinner in the buccal bone around the anterior and premolar teeth, and in the lingual aspect of mandibular molars. All these anatomic characteristics could make the occurrence of the sinus tract more susceptible in these specific regions of the maxillary and mandibular alveolar bone.

Influence of marginal bone loss on peri-implantitis: Systematic review of literature

Background

The marginal bone of dental implants is subjected to slight load modifications over time, conditioning implant survival. Objective: Perform a systematic review of the literature analyzing the factors that contribute to marginal bone loss (MBL) and the subsequent development of peri-implantitis.

Material and Methods

Bibliographic research in the databases PubMed, Medline and Scopus between 2010 and 2018 was performed. The inclusion criteria were articles published in the last 10 years and that were in English or Spanish, that were carried out on humans, that were cohort studies, that included cases and controls or that used randomized clinical trials. Exclusion criteria removed articles that contained clinical cases, case series or systematic reviews.

Results

A total of 90 articles were analyzed that examined all the factors reported in the literature, such as idiosyncratic factors, toxic habits, systemic drugs and implant characteristics (diameter, length, type surface, implant connection, implant design and type of platform at the moment of the prosthetic load). Discussion: Patient characteristics and associated pathologies must be taken into account when assessing MBL. MBL in all dental implants can be considered independent of the type of prosthetic rehabilitation and the moment of load; this was emphasized. The MBL is smaller in dental implants with rough surfaces, switch platforms and infracrestal localization, as they are of multifactorial origin.

Conclusions

All the reviewed articles maintain a common criterion regarding the concept and measurement of the MBL and highlighting the importance of radiodiagnosis for quantification. Longterm prospective studies with unified criteria are needed to reduce bias by identifying the most relevant factors in MBL.

Key words:Marginal bone loss, dental implant, peri-implantitis.

Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to identify, review, analyze, and summarize available evidence on the accuracy of linear measurements when using maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) specifically in the field of implant dentistry.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The search was undertaken in April 2017 in the National Library of Medicine database (Medline) through its online site (PubMed), followed by searches in the Cochrane, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest Dissertation and Thesis databases. The main inclusion criterion for studies was that linear CBCT measurements were performed for quantitative assessment (e.g., height, width) of the alveolar bone at edentulous sites or measuring distances from anatomical structures related to implant dentistry. The studies should compare these values to clinical data (humans) or ex vivo and/or experimental (animal) findings from a "gold standard."

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 2,516 titles. In total, 22 studies were included in the final analysis. Of those, two were clinical and 20 ex vivo investigations. The major findings of the review indicate that CBCT provides cross-sectional images that demonstrate high accuracy and reliability for bony linear measurements on cross-sectional images related to implant treatment. A wide range of error has been reported when performing linear measurements on CBCT images, with both over- and underestimation of dimensions in comparison with a gold standard. A voxel size of 0.3 to 0.4 mm is adequate to provide CBCT images of acceptable diagnostic quality for implant treatment planning.

CONCLUSIONS

CBCT can be considered as an appropriate diagnostic tool for 3D preoperative planning. Nevertheless, a 2 mm safety margin to adjacent anatomic structures should be considered when using CBCT. In clinical practice, the measurement accuracy and reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images are most likely reduced through factors such as patient motion, metallic artefacts, device-specific exposure parameters, the software used, and manual vs. automated procedures.

Evaluation of linear measurements of implant sites based on head orientation during acquisition: An ex vivo study using cone-beam computed tomography

Purpose

This study evaluated the effect of various head orientations during cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image acquisition on linear measurements of potential implant sites.

Materials and Methods

Six dry human skulls with a total of 28 implant sites were evaluated for seven different head orientations. The scans were acquired using a Hitachi CB-MercuRay CBCT machine. The scanned volumes were reconstructed. Horizontal and vertical measurements were made and were compared to measurements made after simulating the head position to corrected head angulations. Data was analyzed using a two-way ANOVA test.

Results

Statistical analysis revealed a significant interaction between the mean errors in vertical measurements with a marked difference observed at the extension head position (P<0.05). Statistical analysis failed to yield any significant interaction between the mean errors in horizontal measurements at various head positions.

Conclusion

Head orientation could significantly affect the vertical measurements in CBCT scans. The main head position influencing the measurements is extension.

Enhancement cone beam computed tomography filters improve in vitro periimplant dehiscence detection

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether cone beam computed tomography filters would improve periimplant dehiscence detection.

STUDY DESIGN

A hundred titanium implants were placed in bovine ribs in which defects simulating periimplant dehiscence had previously been created. After images acquisition, three oral radiologists assessed them with and without the following filters: Angio Sharpen high 5 × 5, Shadow, Sharpen 3 × 3, Sharpen Mild, and Smooth. The McNemar test verified the disagreement between all images versus the reference standard and original images versus images with filters; P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Dehiscence detection using the original images and the Shadow filter disagreed from the reference standard (P < .05), as well as when using the filters instead of the original images (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

All the filters tested, with the exception of the Shadow, improved periimplant dehiscence detection. The Sharpen 3 × 3 filter was considered best for this task.

Detection of periimplant fenestration and dehiscence with the use of two scan modes and the smallest voxel sizes of a cone-beam computed tomography device

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in periimplant fenestration and dehiscence detection, and to determine the effects of 2 voxel sizes and scan modes.

STUDY DESIGN

One hundred titanium implants were placed in bovine ribs in which periimplant fenestration and dehiscence were simulated. CBCT images were acquired with the use of 3 protocols of the i-CAT NG unit: A) 0.2 mm voxel size half-scan (180°); B) 0.2 mm voxel size full-scan (360°); and C) 0.12 mm voxel size full scan (360°). Receiver operating characteristic curves and diagnostic values were obtained. The Az values were compared with the use of analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The Az value for dehiscence in protocol A was significantly lower than those of B or C (P < .01). They did not statistically differ for fenestration (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Protocol B yielded the highest values. The voxel sizes did not affect fenestration and dehiscence detection, and for dehiscence full-scan performed better than half-scan.

Implants in bone: part II. Research on implant osseointegration: material testing, mechanical testing, imaging and histoanalytical methods

PURPOSE

In order to determine whether a newly developed implant material conforms to the requirements of biocompatibility, it must undergo rigorous testing. To correctly interpret the results of studies on implant material osseointegration, it is necessary to have a sound understanding of all the testing methods. The aim of this overview is to elucidate the methods that are used for the experimental evaluation of the osseointegration of implant materials.

DISCUSSION

In recent decades, there has been a constant proliferation of new materials and surface modifications in the field of dental implants. This continuous development of innovative biomaterials requires a precise and detailed evaluation in terms of biocompatibility and implant healing before clinical use. The current gold standard is in vivo animal testing on well validated animal models. However, long-term outcome studies on patients have to follow to finally validate and show patient benefit.

CONCLUSION

No experimental set-up can provide answers for all possible research questions. However, a certain transferability of the results to humans might be possible if the experimental set-up is carefully chosen for the aspects and questions being investigated. To enhance the implant survival rate in the rising number of patients with chronic diseases which compromise wound healing and osseointegration, dental implant research on compromised animal models will further gain importance in future.

Clinical, aesthetic, and patient-related outcome of immediately loaded single implants in the anterior maxilla: a prospective study in extraction sockets, healed ridges, and grafted sites

PURPOSE

The objective of this prospective clinical study was to document the overall treatment outcome of immediately loaded single Astra Tech Osseospeed™ (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) implants placed in extraction sockets, healed ridges, and grafted sites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients in need of a single implant in the anterior maxilla (15-25) were recruited. Patients were allocated to a conventional implant treatment (CIT) or immediate implant treatment (IIT) group on the basis of specific criteria. If the buccal bone plate was damaged or missing upon tooth removal, patients were allocated to a grafted implant treatment (GIT) group. Irrespective of the treatment concept, implants were immediately provisionalized. Hard and soft tissue alterations, aesthetic parameters (pink and white esthetic scores, [PES and WES]) and patient's opinion (Oral Health Impact Profile [OHIP-14] questionnaires) were registered at different time points.

RESULTS

After 1 year of function, the overall implant survival rate was 98% with one failure following IIT. The mean bone level to the implant-abutment interface was 0.65 (SD 0.79), 0.85 (SD 0.64), and 0.56 mm (SD 0.44) for CIT, IIT, and GIT. Complete papilla loss was rare following either strategy. Mean midfacial recession amounted to 1.00 (SD 1.15), 0.12 (SD 0.78), and 0.49 mm (SD 0.82) for CIT, IIT, and GIT, respectively. The aesthetic outcome showed a mean PES of 10.30 (SD 1.89) and mean WES of 7.11 (SD 2.14), all patients considered. Patient's satisfaction showed a significant improvement after 1 year of function on all seven domains (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study showed that single implants clinically and aesthetically perform well under immediate non-occlusal loading conditions in the premaxilla. In this context, it is of pivotal importance to stress that patients were carefully selected for IIT and GIT.