Attributes of response in depressed patients switched to treatment with duloxetine

Pain severity and pain interference during major depressive episodes treated with escitalopram and aripiprazole adjunctive therapy: a CAN-BIND-1 report

Escitalopram may have pain-alleviating effects for patients with comorbid pain and depression. This study aimed to quantify improvements in pain for patients on escitalopram and adjunctive aripiprazole. A secondary analysis of the CAN-BIND-1 trial was conducted which only included participants with a current depressive episode and pain. Participants received escitalopram (10-20mg) for eight weeks and treatment response was defined as a reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) of at least 50% from baseline. Non-responders at week 8 received adjunctive aripiprazole (2-10mg) for another eight weeks. The Brief Pain Inventory's pain severity (PSC) and pain interference (PIC) composite scores were measured at baseline, week 8, and week 16. Linear regression was used to determine how PSC and PIC differed between treatment responders and non-responders. Eighty-two participants with pain and depression received escitalopram. PSC and PIC decreased significantly regardless of treatment response at week 8, although responders had significantly lower PSC and PIC than non-responders. For the group receiving aripiprazole after week 8, neither PSC nor PIC improved further. Further research is needed to identify interventions that might treat both pain and depression symptoms.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of Solid self-nanoemulsifying delivery system (SSNEDDS) loaded with curcumin and duloxetine in attenuation of neuropathic pain in rats

The present investigation is focused on improving oral bioavailability of poorly soluble and lipophilic drugs, curcumin (CRM) and duloxetine (DXH), through the solid self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (S-SNEDDS) and identifying their potential against attenuation of NP in chronic constriction injury (CCI)-induced rats through the solid self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (S-SNEDDS). The optimized batch of S-SNEDDS reported was containing CRM and DXH (30 mg each), castor oil (20% w/w), tween-80 (40% w/w), transcutol-P (40% w/w), and syloid 244 FP (1 g). The high dose of each of naïve CRM (NCH), naïve DXH (NDH), physical mixture of DXH and CRM (C-NCM-DXH), S-SNEDDS-CRM (SCH), S-SNEDDS-DXH (SDH), and S-SNEDDS-CRM-DXH (C-SCH-SDH) was subjected for MTT assay. The developed formulations were subjected to pharmacokinetic studies and results showed about 8 to 11.06 and 2-fold improvement in oral bioavailability of CRM and DXH through S-SNEDDS. Furthermore, CCI-induced male Wistar rats were treated with SSNEDDS containing CRM and DXH, S-SNEDDS containing individual drug, individual naïve forms, and their combination from the day of surgery for 14 days and evaluated for behavioral at pre-determined time intervals. On the terminal day, animals were sacrificed to assess tissue myeloperoxidase, superoxide anion, protein, tumor necrosis factor-α, total calcium levels, and histopathological changes. Pronounced effect was observed in rats treated with S-SNEDDS containing both drugs with respect to rats receiving any of other treatments owing to enhanced oral bioavailability through S-SNEDDS. Therefore, it can be concluded that S-SNEDDS of both drugs and their coadministration can accelerate the prevention of NP.

A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Duloxetine

Duloxetine is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients affected by major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), neuropathic pain (NP), fibromyalgia (FMS), and stress incontinence urinary (SUI). These conditions share parallel pathophysiological pathways, and duloxetine treatment might be an effective and safe alternative. Thus, a systematic review was conducted following the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items (PRISMA) recommendations and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical (JBI) Appraisals guidelines. Eighty-five studies focused on efficacy, safety, and tolerability of duloxetine were included in our systematic review. Studies were subdivided by clinical condition and evaluated individually. Thus, 32 studies of MDD, 11 studies of GAD, 19 studies of NP, 9 studies of FMS, and 14 studies of SUI demonstrated that the measured outcomes indicate the suitability of duloxetine in the treatment of these clinical conditions. This systematic review confirms that the dual mechanism of duloxetine benefits the treatment of comorbid clinical conditions, and supports the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of duloxetine in short- and long-term treatments.

The noradrenergic paradox: implications in the management of depression and anxiety

Both major depressive disorder and the anxiety disorders are major causes of disability and markedly contribute to a significant global burden of the disease worldwide. In part because of the significant socioeconomic burden associated with these disorders, theories have been developed to specifically build clinical treatment approaches. One such theory, the monoaminergic hypothesis, has led to the development of several generations of selective and nonselective inhibitors of transporters of serotonin and norepinephrine, with the goal of augmenting monoaminergic transmission. These efforts have led to considerable success in the development of antidepressant therapeutics. However, there is a strong correlation between enhanced noradrenergic activity and fear and anxiety. Consequently, some physicians have expressed concerns that the same enhanced noradrenergic activity that alleviates depression could also promote anxiety. The fact that the serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors are successfully used in the treatment of anxiety and panic disorders seems paradoxical. This review was undertaken to determine if any clinical evidence exists to show that serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors can cause anxiety. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and the results limited to randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies performed in nongeriatric adults and with clear outcome measures were reported. Based on these criteria, a total of 52 studies were examined. Patients in these studies suffered from depression or anxiety disorders (generalized and social anxiety disorders, panic disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder). The large majority of these studies employed venlafaxine or duloxetine, and the remainder used tri-cyclic antidepressants, atomoxetine, or reboxetine. All the studies reported clinically significant alleviation of depressive and/or anxious symptoms by these therapeutics. In none of these studies was anxiety a treatment-emergent adverse effect. This review argues against the impression that enhanced generalized noradrenergic activity promotes the emergence of anxiety.

Typology of patients with fibromyalgia: cluster analysis of duloxetine study patients

BACKGROUND

To identify distinct groups of patients with fibromyalgia (FM) with respect to multiple outcome measures.

METHODS

Data from 631 duloxetine-treated women in 4 randomized, placebo-controlled trials were included in a cluster analysis based on outcomes after up to 12 weeks of treatment. Corresponding classification rules were constructed using a classification tree method. Probabilities for transitioning from baseline to Week 12 category were estimated for placebo and duloxetine patients (Ntotal = 1188) using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Five clusters were identified, from "worst" (high pain levels and severe mental/physical impairment) to "best" (low pain levels and nearly normal mental/physical function). For patients with moderate overall severity, mental and physical symptoms were less correlated, resulting in 2 distinct clusters based on these 2 symptom domains. Three key variables with threshold values were identified for classification of patients: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference overall scores of <3.29 and <7.14, respectively, a Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) interference with work score of <2, and an FIQ depression score of ≥5. Patient characteristics and frequencies per baseline category were similar between treatments; >80% of patients were in the 3 worst categories. Duloxetine patients were significantly more likely to improve after 12 weeks than placebo patients. A sustained effect was seen with continued duloxetine treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

FM patients are heterogeneous and can be classified into distinct subgroups by simple descriptive rules derived from only 3 variables, which may guide individual patient management. Duloxetine showed higher improvement rates than placebo and had a sustained effect beyond 12 weeks.

Rational site-directed pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder

It is now accepted that major depressive disorder (MDD) is not a single pathophysiological entity. It is therefore not surprising that remission rates to a first antidepressant trial are low. In addition, antidepressants may target various neuronal elements for which there are gene polymorphisms, such as the serotonin (5-HT) reuptake transporter, which may modulate response. Acting on a single monoaminergic target, such as inhibiting the 5-HT transporter, may confer efficacy in MDD, but other targets may be used and/or combined in treatment-resistant patients. These include the blockade of norepinephrine transporters, monoamine oxidase, 5-HT(2A), 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT7 receptors, and the activation of 5-HT(1A) and dopamine 2 receptors. While antidepressants may have more than one of these properties, so do atypical antipsychotics. When using the latter medications, however, their regimens should be below those effective in treating psychosis to avoid dopamine 2 antagonism, which could be counter-productive in MDD. In some patients, combining medications from treatment initiation may also provide additional therapeutic benefits.

Early vs. conventional switching of antidepressants in patients with MDD and moderate to severe pain: a double-blind randomized study

BACKGROUND

Concomitant painful physical symptoms in depressive patients frequently impair functioning and failure to treat these symptoms may adversely impact treatment outcomes of depression. Early vs. conventional switch of antidepressants were compared in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and moderate to severe pain.

METHOD

Pre-specified subgroup analysis of a 16-week, randomized, double-blind clinical study on MDD patients with >30 mm overall pain visual analog scale (VAS). Patients not achieving 30% reduction Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) after 4 weeks escitalopram (10 mg/day) were randomized to duloxetine 60-120 mg/day (early switch) or continued on escitalopram (conventional switch) with non-responders at week 8 switching to duloxetine. Endpoints were time to confirmed response and remission, VAS pain severity, and Sheehan disability scale (SDS). Switch strategies were compared using Kaplan-Meier, logistic regression, and repeated measures analyses.

RESULTS

No differences between early and conventional switching were found in time to confirmed response after randomization (3.9 vs. 4.1 weeks, p=0.511) or remission (6.0 vs. 8.0 weeks, p=0.238). Significantly lower VAS mean pain levels at for overall pain, headache, back pain, shoulder pain, interference with daily activities, and time being awake in pain were found for patients in the early switching group. Time to achieving normal functioning (SDS total score <6) was shorter in the early switching group (p=0.042). Safety results were comparable between switch strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

In MDD patients with moderate to severe painful physical symptoms not improving after 4 weeks of treatment with escitalopram, an earlier switch to duloxetine may lead to better pain and functional outcomes.

Predicting treatment response in major depressive disorder: the impact of early symptomatic improvement

OBJECTIVE

Antidepressants (ADs) are the mainstay of treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). Despite their widespread usage, a consensus does not exist as to the timing of clinically significant symptomatic improvement during an AD trial. The objective of this review is to provide practitioners with empirically based recommendations pertaining to the optimal duration of index (initial) AD therapy before a clinical intervention is warranted.

METHODS

We conducted a nonsystematic review, using a combination of a MeSH key word search, Google Scholar, and the Scopus database. Our search strategy focused on research papers reporting on the early symptomatic response to AD therapy.

RESULTS

Available evidence suggests that there are several subpopulations that exist within whole-group data assigned to an AD treatment. Among the responder subgroups, an early responder group (that is, less than 3 weeks) and later responder group (that is, 3 weeks or more) are identified. People who exhibit early partial symptomatic improvement are more likely to respond to therapy thereafter. However, the interpretability of extant evidence is complicated by the use of disparate statistical approaches with differing computational complexity and sample heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Response outcomes in MDD are heterogeneous. Available data suggest that people may respond early, late, and (or) continuously over time, and may represent distinct subpopulations that provide a proximate indication for treatment response outcomes. Notwithstanding, a pragmatic recommendation would be to consider a treatment intervention (for example, dosage optimization and [or] augmentation) if, after 3 to 4 weeks, symptomatic improvement is insufficient.

Tolerability aspects in duloxetine-treated patients with depression: Should one use a lower starting dose in clinical practice?

OBJECTIVE

This study questions whether a lower starting dose of duloxetine (DLX) could be beneficial for patients with depression, in terms of tolerability and safety in routine clinical care.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Post-hoc analyses of a multicenter, prospective, non-interventional, 6-month study in adult outpatients with a depressive episode was undertaken.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), discontinuations due to TEAEs and hospitalizations due to depression, were all documented at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after treatment initiation/switch to DLX.

RESULTS

Of 4517 patients enrolled, 4313 were included for TEAE evaluation. TEAEs occurred in 17.2% of patients, and SAEs occurred in 0.79% of patients, including one case of suicidal ideation. 1404 patients discontinued within 6 months (TEAEs: n = 119). Starting treatment with 30 mg/day DLX (72.7%) was favored in females, or after inadequate efficacy of previous antidepressant treatment; 60 mg/day DLX was favored in more severe depression and patients receiving concomitant pain medication.

CONCLUSION

Initiating treatment with 60 mg/day DLX was not associated with poorer tolerability in this study. Physicians may be guided by their clinical experience to carefully consider the individual benefit/risk ratio and TEAE susceptibility when deciding to start treatment with a higher or a lower dose of DLX.

Clinical and functional outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder and painful physical symptoms switched to treatment with duloxetine

OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis of a multicenter, single-arm, open-label trial (the Attributes of Response in Depressed Patients Switched to Treatment with Duloxetine [ARDENT] study) assessed the relationship between functional improvement in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and clinical outcomes of mood, pain, and anxiety over 8 weeks after switching treatment to duloxetine in patients with major depressive disorder.

METHODS

Analyses included all 195 patients who completed the study. Pearson's correlation and multivariate regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between change from baseline in SDS total score and 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD(17)) Maier score (mood), Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form average pain score (pain), and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale total score (anxiety) at week 8.

RESULTS

At week 8, change in SDS total score was positively correlated with change in mood (r = 0.49), anxiety (r = 0.44), and pain (r = 0.40). Multivariate linear regression coefficients for mood and pain were estimated at 1.21 (standard error [SE] = 0.184) and 1.16 (SE = 0.180), respectively (both p < 0.0001) compared with 0.02 (SE = 0.097; p = 0.82) for anxiety. Overall, 43% of patients achieved both HAMD(17) and SDS total remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Functional improvement at 8 weeks was positively correlated with mood, pain, and anxiety in patients with major depressive disorder switched to duloxetine. Change in mood and pain exerted a relatively stronger joint effect on functioning than did anxiety in this patient population. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.