In vitro studies investigating the interactions between degarelix, a decapeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone blocker, and cytochrome P450

Prolonged Low-Dose Administration of FDA-Approved Drugs for Non-Cancer Conditions: A Review of Potential Targets in Cancer Cells

Though not specifically designed for cancer therapy, several FDA-approved drugs such as metformin, aspirin, and simvastatin have an effect in lowering the incidence of cancer. However, there is a great discrepancy between in vitro concentrations needed to eliminate cancer cells and the plasma concentration normally tolerated within the body. At present, there is no universal explanation for this discrepancy and several mechanisms have been proposed including targeting cancer stem cells (CSCs) or cellular senescence. CSCs are cells with the ability of self-renewal and differentiation known to be resistant to chemotherapy. Senescence is a response to damage and stress, characterized by permanent cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic resistance. Although, for both situations, there are few examples where low concentrations of the FDA-approved drugs were the most effective, there is no satisfactory data to support that either CSCs or cellular senescence are the target of these drugs. In this review, we concisely summarize the most used FDA-approved drugs for non-cancer conditions as well as their potential mechanisms of action in lowering cancer incidence. In addition, we propose that prolonged low-dose administration (PLDA) of specific FDA-approved drugs can be useful for effectively preventing metastasis formation in selected patients.

Anti-Melanoma Effects of Miconazole: Investigating the Mitochondria Involvement

Miconazole is an antimycotic drug showing anti-cancer effects in several cancers. However, little is known on its effects in melanoma. A375 and SK-MEL-28 human melanoma cell lines were exposed to miconazole and clotrimazole (up to 100 mM). Proliferation, viability with MTT assay and vascular mimicry were assayed at 24 h treatment. Molecular effects were measured at 6 h, namely, ATP-, ROS-release and mitochondria-related cytofluorescence. A metabolomic profile was also investigated at 6 h treatment. Carnitine was one of the most affected metabolites; therefore, the expression of 29 genes involved in carnitine metabolism was investigated in the public platform GEPIA2 on 461 melanoma patients and 558 controls. After 24 h treatments, miconazole and clotrimazole strongly and significantly inhibited proliferation in the presence of 10% serum on either melanoma cell lines; they also strongly reduced viability and vascular mimicry. After 6 h treatment, ATP reduction and ROS increase were observed, as well as a significant reduction in mitochondria-related fluorescence. Further, in A375, miconazole strongly and significantly altered expression of several metabolites including carnitines, phosphatidyl-cholines, all amino acids and several other small molecules, mostly metabolized in mitochondria. The expression of 12 genes involved in carnitine metabolism was found significantly modified in melanoma patients, 6 showing a significant impact on patients' survival. Finally, miconazole antiproliferation activity on A375 was found completely abrogated in the presence of carnitine, supporting a specific role of carnitine in melanoma protection toward miconazole effect, and was significantly reversed in the presence of caspases inhibitors such as ZVAD-FMK and Ac-DEVD-CHO, and a clear pro-apoptotic effect was observed in miconazole-treated cells, by FACS analysis of Annexin V-FITC stained cells. Miconazole strongly affects proliferation and other biological features in two human melanoma cell lines, as well as mitochondria-related functions such as ATP- and ROS-release, and the expression of several metabolites is largely dependent on mitochondria function. Miconazole, likely acting via carnitine and mitochondria-dependent apoptosis, is therefore suggested as a candidate for further investigations in melanoma treatments.

Predicting Interactions between Rifampin and Antihypertensive Drugs Using the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Lack of blood pressure control is often seen in hypertensive patients concomitantly taking antituberculosis medications due to the complex drug-drug interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs. Therefore, it is of clinical importance to understand the underlying mechanisms of these interactions to help formulate recommendations on the use of antihypertensive drugs in patients taking these medications concomitantly. Our objective was to assess the reliability of the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS) to predict potential interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs and thus provide recommendations on the choice of antihypertensive drugs in patients receiving rifampin.

DESIGN

Evidence-based in vitro and in vivo predictions of drug-drug interactions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We systematically evaluated interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs using the theory of the BDDCS, taking into consideration the role of drug transporters and metabolic enzymes involved in these interactions. We provide recommendations on the selection of antihypertensive drugs for patients with tuberculosis. Antihypertensive drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the China National Medical Products Administration were included in this study. The drugs were classified into four categories under the BDDCS classification. Detailed information on cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes and drug transporters for each antihypertensive drug was searched in PubMed and other electronic databases. This information was combined with the effects of rifampin on CYP enzymes and drug transporters, and the direction and relative extent of the potential interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs were predicted. Recommendations were then made using the theory of BDDCS. A thorough systematic literature review was performed, and data from all published human studies and case reports were summarized for the validation of our predictions. Interventional and observational studies published in PubMed and two Chinese databases (CNKI and WanFang) through December 16, 2019, were included, and data were extracted for validation of the predictions. Using the BDDCS theory, class 3 active drugs were predicted to exhibit minimal interactions with rifampin. On reviewing case reports and pre-post studies, the predictions we made were found to be reliable. When antituberculosis medications that include rifampin are started in patients with hypertension, it is recommended that the use of calcium channel blockers and classes 1 and 2 β-blockers be avoided. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, olmesartan, class 3 β-blockers, spironolactone, and hydrochlorothiazide would be preferable because clinically relevant interactions would not be expected.

CONCLUSION

Application of the BDDCS to predict interactions between rifampin and antihypertensive drugs for patients with both tuberculosis and hypertension was found to be reliable. It should be noted, however, that based on the CYP enzyme and drug transporter information we reviewed, the mechanisms of all of the interactions could not be elucidated, and the predictions are only based on theory. The real effects of rifampin on antihypertensive drugs need to be further observed. More studies in both animals and humans are needed in the future.

Drug-Drug Interactions in Prostate Cancer Treatment

Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which can cause serious and debilitating drug-induced adverse events. With a steadily aging population and associated increasing multimorbidity and polypharmacy, the potential for DDIs becomes considerably important. Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men and occurs mostly in elderly men in the Western world. Therefore, the aim of this review is to give an overview of DDIs in PCa therapy to better understand pharmacodynamic and pharm kinetic side effects as well as their interactions with other medications. Last, we explore potential future strategies, which might help to optimize treatment and reduce adverse events patients with polypharmacy and PCa.

Degarelix: a review of its use in patients with prostate cancer

Degarelix (Firmagon(®); Gonax(®)) is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist that is approved for the treatment of advanced (hormone-dependent) prostate cancer in the US and EU and the treatment of prostate cancer in Japan. In a pivotal randomized, controlled, 12-month phase III study, degarelix (initial subcutaneous dose of 240 mg followed by monthly dosages of 80 mg) was noninferior to leuprolide (monthly intramuscular dosages of 7.5 mg) in patients with prostate cancer of any stage for which endocrine treatment was indicated (except neoadjuvant hormonal therapy) with regard to suppression of testosterone to castration levels (i.e. ≤0.5 ng/mL). Suppression of testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels was faster with degarelix than with leuprolide, and no testosterone surges or microsurges were seen in degarelix recipients. Suppression of testosterone and PSA levels was maintained for the 12-month study duration and continued for up to 5 years in an extension to the main trial (including in patients switching from leuprolide to degarelix in the extension). The drug was generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being mild to moderate in severity. Injection-site reactions and events reflecting the expected effects of testosterone suppression (e.g. hot flushes, weight increase) were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events. Thus, degarelix is a useful option for the treatment of prostate cancer in patients for whom endocrine treatment is indicated.

In vitro and in vivo human metabolism of degarelix, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor blocker

Degarelix is a decapeptide that shows high affinity/selectivity to human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors and has been approved for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer in the United States, European Union, and Japan. To investigate the metabolism of degarelix in humans, in vitro metabolism was addressed in liver tissue and in vivo metabolism was studied in plasma and excreta samples collected in clinical studies. In addition, drug transporter interaction potential of degarelix with selected efflux transporters and uptake transporters was studied using in vitro membrane vesicle-based assays and whole cell-based assays. In vitro degradation was observed in fresh hepatocytes; less than 25% of the initial concentration of degarelix remained after incubation at 37°C for 2 hours. One metabolite was detected, representing a truncated nonapeptide of degarelix. The same metabolite was also detected at low concentrations in plasma. The in vivo investigations also showed that degarelix is excreted unchanged via the urine but is undergoing extensive sequential peptidic degradation during its elimination via the hepato-biliary pathway. No unique human metabolites of degarelix were detected in the circulation or in the excreta. Degarelix did not show any interaction with selected efflux transporters and uptake transporters up to concentrations representing 200 times the clinical concentration. Because degarelix does not seem to interact with the cytochrome P450 enzyme system as substrate, inhibitor, or inducer and does not show any interaction with hepatic and renal uptake and efflux transporters, the risk for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with this compound is highly unlikely.

Anti-proliferative actions of N'-desmethylsorafenib in human breast cancer cells

The multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib is used for the treatment of renal and hepatic carcinomas and is undergoing evaluation for treatment of breast cancer in combination with other agents. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 converts sorafenib to multiple metabolites that have been detected in patient plasma. However, recent clinical findings suggest that combination therapy may elicit inhibitory pharmacokinetic interactions involving sorafenib that increase toxicity. While sorafenib N-oxide is an active metabolite, information on the anti-tumor actions of other metabolites is unavailable. The present study evaluated the actions of sorafenib and its five major metabolites in human breast cancer cell lines. All agents, with the exception of N'-hydroxymethylsorafenib N-oxide, decreased ATP formation in four breast cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7 and T-47D). Prolonged treatment of MDA-MB-231 cells with N'-desmethylsorafenib, N'-desmethylsorafenib N-oxide and sorafenib (10 μM, 72 h) produced small increases in caspase-3 activity to 128-139% of control. Sorafenib and its metabolites, again with the exception of N'-hydroxymethylsorafenib N-oxide, impaired MEK/ERK signaling in MDA-MB-231 cells and modulated the expression of cyclin D1 and myeloid cell leukemia sequence-1, which regulate cell viability. When coadministered with doxorubicin (0.5 or 1 μM), sorafenib and N'-desmethylsorafenib (25 μM) produced greater effects on ATP production than either treatment alone. Thus, it emerges that, by targeting the MEK/ERK pathway, multiple sorafenib metabolites may contribute to the actions of sorafenib in breast cancer. Because N'-desmethylsorafenib is not extensively metabolized and does not inhibit major hepatic CYPs, this metabolite may have a lower propensity to precipitate pharmacokinetic drug interactions than sorafenib.