Reducing violence in a child psychiatric hospital through planned organizational change

Mapping review of interventions to reduce the use of restrictive practices in children and young people's institutional settings: The CONTRAST study

Restrictive practices are often used harmfully with children in institutional settings. Interventions to reduce their use do not appear to have been mapped systematically. Using environmental scanning, we conducted a broad-scope mapping review of English language academic databases, websites and social media, using systematic methods. Included records (N = 121) were mostly from the United States and contained details of 82 different interventions. Children's participation was limited. Reporting quality was inconsistent, which undermined claims of effectiveness. Overall, despite a multitude of interventions, evidence is limited. Leaders should consider the evidence, including children's perspectives, before introducing poorly understood interventions into children's settings.

Acute psychiatric care for pediatric patients

Higher level or acute psychiatric care for youth is intended to be active but short-term treatment focussing on crisis stabilisation, assessment, safety monitoring, and longer-term treatment planning. The focus of this article is on describing common challenges and the effort to address these challenges through new approaches to acute psychiatric care for children and adolescents. The review finds that (1) inpatient paediatric psychiatry beds are in high demand and often difficult to access, (2) there are a number of common challenges these units face including managing length of stays, readmissions, and adverse events, and (3) there are encouraging therapeutic approaches adapted for this setting. There is still much work to be done to advance the evidence-base for acute psychiatric care for youth particularly in defining and assessing an effective admission. Paediatric psychiatry patients are a vulnerable population and call for our best tools to be put to use to improve the quality and safety of care.

Implementation of Modified Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in a youth psychiatric partial hospital program

Objective

Seclusion and restraint are procedures utilized in youth psychiatric settings. While a number of agencies have called for a reduction and ultimate elimination of the use of these practices, there has been limited research on behavioral programs to reduce seclusion/restraint. This is particularly true for research on behavioral programming in youth psychiatric partial hospital settings. As such, the current study sought to examine the effectiveness of a modified version of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (M-PBIS) implemented on a youth psychiatric partial hospital service to reduce seclusion/restraint.

Method

This naturalistic, prospective study covered a 26-month period and utilized a pre–post design. M-PBIS features include a defined set of positive behavioral expectations, a system to teach behavioral expectations, reinforcement of appropriate behaviors, data collection/evidence-based decision making, individual support for those not responding to the unit-wide system, active support by all stakeholders (including all staff members agreeing to the program), and positive recognition among staff.

Results

With a sample of 442 admissions, there were meaningful reductions in the percent of patients who were in seclusion/restraint (from 47.6 to 6.7%) as well as the overall seclusion/restraint rate (from 3.56 ( SD = 1.94) to 0.48 ( SD = 0.64)). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in the use of Pro Re Nata (PRN) medication for agitation/aggression (percent of patient who received a PRN decreased from 33.3 to 12.9%).

Conclusions

This naturalistic study suggests that M-PBIS is a promising intervention for use in youth psychiatric partial hospital services to reduce seclusion/restraint and PRN medication for agitation/aggression. Reduction and ultimate elimination of seclusion/restraint is a critical objective in improving the quality and safety of acute mental health services for youth.

[Effects of Ward Interventions on Repeated Critical Incidents in Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatient Care]

Effects of Ward Interventions on Repeated Critical Incidents in Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatient Care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of several ward interventions (transition to an open ward concept, individualized treatment plans, tiered crisis-management, staff training, quality control) on repeated critical incidents, non-restrictive and restrictive measures. The outcome variables were compared in two time periods, 2007 and 2011. The study included 74 critical incident reports of 51 child and adolescent inpatients that had at least one hospital stay and one critical incident in the selected time periods. Aggressive, self-harming, and absconding incidents were included. The quantitative results suggest that ward interventions can contribute to a reduction of repeated critical incidents and restrictive measures. The qualitative evaluation suggests a cultural change of crisis management.

Curtailing The Use Of Restraint In Psychiatric Settings

This article explains past and current theory and practice regarding the use of coercion with persons targeted for psychiatric treatment and outlines the benefits of reducing the use of force in psychiatric settings for consumers, staff, and the wider society. Resources are described for building explicitly noncoercive norms in a therapeutic community by establishing a coherent humanistic theoretical basis, with special attention to trauma theory. The article analyzes the causes of human aggression and the impact of violence on the healing process and describes case examples of nonviolent clinical settings. Appendices offer tips for practical application.

Violence and restraint reduction efforts on inpatient psychiatric units

Efforts to reduce aggression and violence and the use of restraint and seclusion have traditionally been through some form of educational program. This paper presents an integrative review of research and quality improvement projects that aimed to reduce aggression/violence or restraint/seclusion through the use of an educational program. Forty-six papers are included in this review. This paper presents summaries and comparisons of the research designs, the content and length of programs, and the outcomes of these programs. From these summaries, trends in relation to design, content, and outcomes are identified, and recommendations for clinicians and researchers are given.

Exposure to aggression and the impact on staff in a child and adolescent inpatient unit

Aggression is common in mental health services, but little research has examined exposure to aggression and its impact on staff in children and adolescent settings. Staff members within a child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit were interviewed to examine exposure to aggression and perceptions about the impact of aggression. Involvement in episodes of physical aggression was common (84.8%, 28/33) and was linked to difficulty attending work and other emotional and professional sequelae. These findings suggest that aggression is an important issue for staff working in child and adolescent settings and that aggression may impair the therapeutic capacity of staff.

Restraints and the code of ethics: An uneasy fit

This article examines the use of physical restraints through the four broad principles of ethics common to all helping professions. It asks whether the continued use of physical restraints is consistent with ethical practice through the lens of those principles. It also examines where the necessity to use restraints in the absence of empirically supported alternatives leaves professionals in terms of conflicts between ethical principles and makes recommendations for changes in education and clinical practice. It concludes that an analysis through a bioethics lens demonstrates that the use of restraints as a tool in psychiatric settings is a complex and multifaceted problem. Principles of ethics may often be in conflict with each other in instances where patients must be physically restrained.

Physical aggression during admission to a child and adolescent inpatient unit: predictors and impact on clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Aggressive behaviour is common in young people admitted to child and adolescent inpatient services. Little is known about how physical aggression during admission influences patient outcomes. The aim of the present study was to identify predictors of aggression in a child and adolescent inpatient unit and examine differences in clinical outcomes between aggressive and non-aggressive patients.

METHOD

Episodes of aggression occurring within a child and adolescent inpatient unit were prospectively documented between October 2004 and December 2005. Patient factors (demographics, diagnoses, clinical history) were examined as predictors of aggression. Outcomes for admissions in which more than one episode of physical aggression occurred were compared to those in which no aggression occurred. Outcomes assessed were changes in symptom severity (as rated by the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents) length of stay, and initiation of medications.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients were admitted during the study period (61.9% female, mean age=13.8 years, SD=2.9); 31 patients (23.1%) exhibited physical aggression during admission and 20 of these exhibited more than one episode of physical aggression. Factors that predicted persistent physical aggression included history of aggression, use of medications at presentation and absence of self-harm. Persistent aggression was also associated with increased length of stay, but did not compromise improvements in clinical symptom ratings between admission and discharge or lead to increased medication prescribing.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to hypotheses and existing research, aggression during admission does not appear to be a barrier to clinical improvement. Further research is necessary to clarify how aggressive children can receive the most benefit from inpatient admission while minimizing the risks to the patient and those around them.

Behavioral management leads to reduction in aggression in a child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit

OBJECTIVE

Aggression is common in children and adolescents admitted to psychiatric inpatient units. Few interventions for reducing aggressive behaviors have been identified. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a milieu-based behavioral management program on the frequency of aggressive behaviors in a child and adolescent mental health inpatient unit.

METHOD

The behavioral management program incorporated individualized patient management plans, early detection and prevention, staff training, reinforcement of appropriate behaviors, and intervention using the least restrictive option. Outcomes were assessed for 6 months before and after program introduction, and included episodes of aggressive behavior, injuries, use of physical restraint, seclusion, p.r.n. sedation, use of security services, and staffing factors.

RESULTS

Implementation of behavioral management led to a significant reduction in the episodes of aggressive behavior (p < .05) and other unwanted outcomes including injuries (p < .05), use of physical restraint (p < .001), and duration of seclusion (p < .001). These outcomes were achieved without reducing the number of admissions, changing the types of patients admitted, increasing staff costs, or increasing the use of p.r.n. medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive behaviors in child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient units can be reduced by implementing a broad-based behavioral management program. These findings highlight the importance of organizational approaches to behavior and risk management.

Evidence base for practice: reduction of restraint and seclusion use during child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient treatment

BACKGROUND

Restraint and seclusion of children has great potential for harm. Since the mid-1980s, psychiatric inpatient personnel for children and adolescents have put considerable energy in reducing the use of extreme measures of aggression management. While the use of restraints is a particular problem in the United States, aggression management and means of control in psychiatric settings is an international issue.

APPROACH

The core question of this review was: What is the current state of the evidence supporting restraint reduction efforts with children and adolescents? Studies were reviewed and critiqued that related to programs of restraint reduction, restraint reduction methods, and aggression management. Internationally, there seems to be more emphasis on reducing coercive measures by understanding the context of their use. Thus, studies exploring staff perceptions and decisions concerning coercive measures were also examined.

FINDINGS

The evidence supporting restraint reduction methods in the United States comes mainly from case study reports of clinical sites' quality improvement projects. Consequently, a collection of studies is accumulating that supports a multi-strategy approach to restraint reduction. Limited evidence exists for aggression management measures and training in de-escalation techniques. Controversial aggression management techniques such as the use of pro re nata medication and holding continue to be used with very little support for their efficacy.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations include taking a view of restraint and seclusion as emergency measures to address dangerous aggression, not interventions examined in controlled studies. As such it is suggested that sites pool data on restraint use and reduction efforts to create a database for benchmarking and studying variations among hospitals. Furthermore, attention should also be given to developing additional means for addressing aggressive behaviors.

Seclusion use with children and adolescents: an Australian experience

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the current state of knowledge on the use of seclusion and restraint with children and adolescents and to report the findings of an exploratory study to identify factors that place a child or adolescent at increased risk of seclusion during their admission.

METHOD

Literature searches were undertaken on MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases. Articles were identified that focused specifically on seclusion and restraint use with children and adolescents or contained material significant to this population. The study reports findings from a retrospective review of patient charts, seclusion registers and staffing from an Australian acute inpatient facility.

RESULTS

The data available in regard to seclusion use in this population is limited and flawed. Further research is needed on the use and outcomes of seclusion and restraint and on alternative measures in the containment of dangerousness. Both the literature and this study find that patients with certain factors are at increased risk of being secluded during an inpatient stay. These factors include being male, diagnoses of disruptive behaviour disorder and a previous history of physical abuse. Staffing factors did not show a relationship to the use of seclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

There are patient factors that predict increased risk of seclusion; these factors and their interrelationships require further elucidation. Further research is also needed on the outcomes, both positive and negative, of seclusion use and of alternatives to seclusion.

Mesures de contrôle en milieu psychiatrique : trois perspectives pour en guider la réduction, voire l’élimination

Cet article présente dans un premier temps, le contexte dans lequel se situent les orientations ministérielles en matière de mesures de contrôle en psychiatrie telles la contention et l’isolement. Les auteurs exposent les connaissances concernant l’utilisation et la réduction des mesures et proposent trois perspectives pour en guider la réduction et l’élimination. La première perspective est orientée vers le contrôle de l’agir violent, la seconde, guidée par une meilleure compréhension de l’expérience vécue par les acteurs impliqués dans l’agir violent. La troisième perspective proposée par les auteurs est dirigée vers l’intégration du traumatisme comme expérience et prend en compte les différentes dimensions du cycle de la violence auquel contribuent les mesures de contrôle. Enfin, les auteurs concluent sur des pistes d’intervention pour réduire, sinon éliminer les mesures de contrôle en psychiatrie.

A synthesis of what we know about the use of physical restraints and seclusion with patients in psychiatric and acute care settings: 2003 update

PURPOSE

This article is an update of the January 19, 2000, Volume 7, Number 2 article of the synthesis of research findings on the use of restraint and seclusion with patients in psychiatric and acute care settings.

CONCLUSIONS

The little that is known about restraint/seclusion use with these populations is inconsistent. Attitudes and perceptions of patients, family, and staff differ. However, all patients had very negative feelings about both, whether they were restrained/secluded or observed by others who were not restrained. The reasons for restraint/seclusion use vary with no accurate use rate for either. What precipitates the use of restraint/seclusion also varies, but professionals claim they are necessary to prevent/treat violent or unruly behavior. Some believe seclusion/restraint is effective, but there is no empirical evidence to support this belief. Many less restrictive alternatives have been tested with varying outcomes. Several educational programs to help staff learn about different ways to handle violent/confused patients have been successful.

IMPLICATIONS

Until more is known about restraint/seclusion use from prospective controlled research, the goal to use least restrictive methods must be pursued. More staff educational programs must be offered and the evaluation of alternatives to restraint/seclusion pursued. When seclusion/restraint is necessary, it should be used less arbitrarily, less frequently, and with less trauma. As the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) and the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) have prescribed, "Seclusion and restraint must be a last resort, emergency response to a crisis situation that presents imminent risk of harm to the patient, staff, or others" (p. 25) [99A].

The controversy over "chemical restraint" in acute care psychiatry

In many healthcare settings, medications are considered a less invasive alternative to the use of physical restraint for agitated patients experiencing a behavioral crisis, a practice that is often referred to as "chemical restraint." However, recent federal regulations appear to equate chemical and physical restraint and to characterize both as extraordinary practices that should not be undertaken lightly. Although many clinicians consider the term "chemical restraint" pejorative, since it does not reflect the possibility that forced medication may be clinically necessary and have a beneficial effect, the term is embedded in recent regulatory language. The author first reviews the controversy over the concept of chemical restraint as it has developed in the mental health literature and regulatory policy. As yet there is no consensus among clinicians or policy makers whether such use of medications is a form of coercion or a form of patient-focused intensive care. The author then discusses precipitants of emergency care and clinical factors and situations that may lead to the use of medications in a way that might be considered chemical restraint. Such factors include clinical and demographic characteristics of patients, institutional characteristics, and staff perception and attitudes. In the final section of the article, the author reviews the recommendations concerning the emergency use of medications given in the Expert Consensus Guidelines on the Treatment of Behavioral Emergencies and discusses treatment developments that have occurred since the time of the survey on which those guidelines were based.

Examining the therapeutic utility of restraints and seclusion with children and youth: the role of theory and research in practice

Restraining and secluding children living in residential facilities, though controversial, are commonly practiced by staff to manage disruptive behavior. In an effort to address some of the ongoing issues about the practice, this article examined the reasons for their use, their theoretical underpinnings, and extant empirical evidence in support of the theories. It is suggested that the current array of theories be updated and comprehensive research programs be encouraged to assess their clinical utility with various populations in a variety of settings.

Practice parameter for the prevention and management of aggressive behavior in child and adolescent psychiatric institutions, with special reference to seclusion and restraint

This parameter reviews the current state of the prevention and management of child and adolescent aggressive behavior in psychiatric institutions, with particular reference to the indications and use of seclusion and restraint. It also presents guidelines that have been developed in response to professional, regulatory, and public concern about the use of restrictive interventions with aggressive patients with regard to personal safety and patient rights. The literature on the use of seclusion, physical restraint, mechanical restraint, and chemical restraint is reviewed, and procedures for carrying out each of these interventions are described. Clinical and regulatory agency perspectives on these interventions are presented. Effectiveness, indications, contraindications, complications, and adverse effects of seclusion and restraint procedures are addressed. Interventions are presented to provide more opportunities to promote patient independence and satisfaction with treatment while diminishing the necessity of using restrictive procedures.

Developing a restraint-reduction program for child/adolescent inpatient treatment

TOPIC

Meeting mandated guidelines to reduce, if not eliminate, the use of restraints with children and adolescents hospitalized on inpatient psychiatric units.

PURPOSE

To present eight promising options for restraint reduction with inpatient children and adolescents, and the research that supports their efficacy.

SOURCES

Review of the literature.

CONCLUSION

By combining what is known about child/adolescent restraint use with restraint-reduction research in the adult field, several options for restraint reduction can be derived.

Seclusion and restraint of children: a literature review

TOPIC

Nurses' attitudes toward the use of seclusion and restraint with children.

PURPOSE

To review recent literature concerning these controversial interventions, and to examine possible alternative therapeutic interventions.

SOURCES

Selected published nursing and psychiatric literature 1987 to 1998.

CONCLUSIONS

Staff have a positive attitude toward the use of seclusion and restraint. A theory of power and control may explain their use when many alternative, less restrictive interventions are available.

Coercion Theory: Application to the Inpatient Treatment of Conduct-Disordered Children

TOPIC

Conduct disorders in children are a phenomenon of concern in child and adolescent psychiatric nursing.

PURPOSE

To review the major principles of coercion theory, provide an analysis of the relevant research, and discuss implications for inpatient nursing care.

SOURCES

Published literature from the fields of medicine, nursing, psychology, sociology, and clinical experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The principles of coercion theory are conceptually relevant in developing intervention strategies to treat conduct disorders and to interrupt escalation of aggressive behavior patterns in inpatient settings.

A restraint on restraints: the need to reconsider the use of restrictive interventions

Children with behavior problems are put in units with milieu therapy for the support and guidance of a specialized health care team, supposedly experts in the care of children with these unique and urgent needs. The reality of such units, however, is that those with the most contact with the children are often inadequately prepared, both in terms of knowledge and skills, to manage disruptive behaviors. As a result, the milieu that is supposed to provide support and structure can actually exacerbate the trauma for the vulnerable child. Preliminary data are presented from an ongoing study that is investigating the experiences and memories of formerly hospitalized children. Three types of traumatic experiences are described: vicarious trauma, alienation from staff, and direct trauma. Many of the traumatic events endured by child patients are the result of an inappropriate use by staff of power and force. There was a marked lack of understanding by the children of why given interventions were used. Although coercive interventions are sometimes necessary, ethical, legal, and other professional considerations make it clear that more work is needed. Research to identify the patterns of lack of knowledge and skills, as well as to develop appropriate interventions are recommended.

Pursuit of the ordinary: short-term inpatient treatment

Short-term inpatient care creates tension between administrative mandates to reduce costs through shortened lengths of stay and staff members' commitment to the philosophy, treatment strategies, and milieu organization associated with extended inpatient care. The attempt to practice as usual within the shortened stay, that is, to do long-term treatment quickly, is bound to fail. Effective short-term care is possible, but only when the culture and treatment approach of the unit are radically altered from those of the traditional model. Short-term inpatient treatment can be understood as the pursuit of ordinary behavior during the inpatient stay. This article offers a set of norms and expectations appropriate for this pursuit.