Selective plasma exchange with dialysis in patients with acute liver failure

Retrospective observational study of changes in serum cytokines and adiponectin with continuous plasma exchange with dialysis therapy for severe COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a marked increase in the inflammatory cytokines, IL-6 and IL-18. Blood purification therapy aimed at controlling cytokines is one treatment option; however, evidence of its effectiveness is needed. Plasma exchange with dialysis (PED) is a blood purification method involving selective plasma exchange with dialysate flowing through the outer hollow fiber of the plasma separator. In this retrospective study, we investigated the efficacy of continuous PED (cPED) over 48 h in five patients with severe COVID-19.

METHODS

We assessed changes in IL-6 and IL-18, as well as adiponectin (APN).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in changes in IL-6 and IL-18, but there was a marked improvement in cases with abnormally high IL-6 and IL-18 levels at baseline. APN, which inhibits inflammatory cytokines, was significantly elevated post-cPED.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that cPED therapy is an effective treatment for COVID-19.

Efficacy and safety of plasma diafiltration: Review of case reports and case series

Plasma diafiltration (PDF), a blood purification procedure that combines dialysis with plasma filtration by a selective membrane, has been used to treat acute liver failure, sepsis, and other acute conditions. We reviewed 14 eligible case reports and case series that examined PDF in 357 patients to assess its efficacy and safety. Fourteen diseases may be indications for PDF. The primary indication in the included studies was acute liver failure without obvious inducement or cause not mentioned. Eighty-three patients reached the primary endpoint (31 deaths, 52 recoveries) and the efficacy was 62.7%. There were large changes in 16 toxins or clinical markers after PDF, including total bilirubin, IL-18, IL-6. In conclusion, PDF appears to be an effective treatment for clearance of bilirubin and other inflammatory mediators in patients with acute liver injury or a disease characterized by a systemic inflammatory state. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare PDF with other blood purification methods, such as plasma exchange and the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System™.

Value of extracorporeal artificial liver support in pediatric acute liver failure: A single-center experience of over 10 years

PURPOSE

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a life-threatening disease characterized by rapid-onset liver dysfunction, coagulopathy, and encephalopathy in patients without chronic liver disease. Today, the combined application of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and plasma exchange (PEX), which are forms of supportive extracorporeal therapy (SECT), with conventional liver therapy in ALF is recommended. This study aims to retrospectively analyze the effects of combined SECT in pediatric patients with ALF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 42 pediatric patients, followed in the liver transplantation intensive care unit. The patients had ALF and received PEX supportive therapy with combined CVVHDF. The biochemical lab values of the results for the patients before the first combined SECT and after the last combined SECT were analyzed comparatively.

RESULTS

Of the pediatric patients included in our study, 20 were girls and 22 were boys. Liver transplantation was performed in 22 patients, and 20 patients recovered without transplantation. After the discontinuation of combined SECT, all patients had significantly lower serum liver function test results (total bilirubin, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase), ammonia, and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio levels than the previous levels (p < 0.01). Hemodynamic parameters (i.e., mean arterial pressure) also improved significantly.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Combined CVVHDF and PEX treatment significantly improved biochemical parameters and clinical findings, including encephalopathy, in pediatric patients with ALF. PEX therapy combined with CVVHDF is a proper supportive therapy for bridging or recovery.

Continuous plasma exchange with dialysis for thrombotic microangiopathy in intensive care unit: Retrospective observational study

Continuous plasma exchange with dialysis is a novel method of blood purification and is a modification of the plasma exchange. Technically, this process suggests a reduction in adverse events, cost-effectiveness, and compatibility with hemodynamic instability. The therapeutic effect of plasma exchange on thrombotic microangiopathies has been established. We present three clinical cases in the intensive care unit that illustrate continuous plasma exchange with dialysis as a flexible blood purification therapy for critically ill patients; a radical treatment, thrombotic microangiopathies; supportive therapy, multiple organ failure; and fluid balance regulator. The retrospective analysis of 13 continuous plasma exchange with dialysis sessions showed that the platelet count increased significantly (p = 0.0096) after its administration. The total protein, albumin, fibrinogen, or calcium did not decrease significantly after continuous plasma exchange with dialysis, suggesting therapeutic efficacy and fewer adverse events. A prospective study on thrombotic microangiopathies for continuous plasma exchange with dialysis is currently underway.

Membrane-Based Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Intensive Care

The principles and use of plasmapheresis are often little understood by intensivists. We propose to review the principles, the main indications, and the methods of using this technique.

AMBAR, an Encouraging Alzheimer's Trial That Raises Questions

Grifols' recent Alzheimer Management by Albumin Replacement (“AMBAR”) study investigated the effects of plasmapheresis with albumin replacement, plus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in some subjects, in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). AMBAR was a phase IIb trial in the United States and a phase III trial in Europe. There were three treatment groups (plasmapheresis with albumin replacement; plasmapheresis with low dose albumin and IVIG; plasmapheresis with high dose albumin and IVIG) and sham-treated controls. Disease progression in pooled treated patients was 66% less than control subjects based on ADAS-Cog scores (p = 0.06) and 52% less based on ADCS-ADL scores (p = 0.03). Moderate AD patients had 61% less progression, based on both ADAS-Cog and ADCS-ADL scores, than their sham-treated counterparts (p-values 0.05 and 0.002), and their CDR-Sb scores declined 53% less than their sham-treated counterparts. However, ADAS-Cog and ADCS-ADL scores were not significantly different between actively-treated and sham-treated mild AD patients, although CDR-Sb scores improved vs. baseline for treated mild AD patients. Patients administered both IVIG and albumin had less reduction in brain glucose metabolism than sham-treated patients. Questions raised by these findings include: what mechanism(s) contributed to slowing of disease progression? Is this approach as effective in mild AD as in moderate AD? Must IVIG be included in the protocol? Does age, sex, or ApoE genotype influence treatment response? Does the protocol increase the risk for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities? How long does disease progression remain slowed post-treatment? A further study should allow this approach to be optimized.

Plasma exchange in patients with acute and acute-on-chronic liver failure: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver (ACLF) carry high short-term mortality rate, and may result from a wide variety of causes. Plasma exchange has been shown in a randomized control trial to improve survival in ALF especially in patients who did not receive a liver transplant. Other cohort studies demonstrated potential improvement in survival in patients with ACLF.

AIM

To assess utility of plasma exchange in liver failure and its effect on mortality in patients who do not undergo liver transplantation.

METHODS

Databases MEDLINE via PubMed, and EMBASE were searched and relevant publications up to 30 March, 2019 were assessed. Studies were included if they involved human participants diagnosed with liver failure who underwent plasma exchange, with or without another alternative non-bioartificial liver assist device.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty four records were reviewed, of which 62 studies were found to be duplicates. Of the 262 records screened, 211 studies were excluded. Fifty-one articles were assessed for eligibility, for which 7 were excluded. Twenty-nine studies were included for ALF only, and 9 studies for ACLF only. Six studies included both ALF and ACLF patients. A total of 44 publications were included. Of the included publications, 2 were randomized controlled trials, 14 cohort studies, 12 case series, 16 case reports. All of three ALF studies which looked at survival rate or survival days reported improvement in outcome with plasma exchange. In two out of four studies where plasma exchange-based liver support systems were compared to standard medical treatment (SMT) for ACLF, a biochemical improvement was seen. Survival in the non-transplanted patients was improved in all four studies in patients with ACLF comparing plasma exchange vs SMT. Using the aforementioned studies, plasma exchange based therapy in ACLF compared to SMT improved survival in non-transplanted patients at 30 and 90-d with a pooled OR of 0.60 (95%CI 0.46-0.77, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The level of evidence for use of high volume plasma exchange in selected ALF cases is high. Plasma exchange in ACLF improves survival at 30-and 90-d in non-transplanted patients. Further well-designed randomized control trials will need to be carried out to ascertain the optimal duration and amount of plasma exchange required and assess if the use of high volume plasma exchange can be extrapolated to patients with ACLF.

A good response to glucocorticoid for sub-acute liver failure: a case report

Liver failure is a severe clinical syndrome presenting with coagulation dysfunction, jaundice, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites. It often has a dismal prognosis. The role of glucocorticoid for the treatment of liver failure is unclear. In this paper, we reported that a female patient with sub-acute liver failure had a good response to glucocorticoid.

Selective Plasma Exchange for Critically Ill Patients Accompanied With Thrombocytopenia

Selective plasma exchange is a blood purification therapy in which simple plasma exchange is performed using a selective membrane plasma separator (pore size of 0.03 µm). Seven critically ill patients accompanied with thrombocytopenia were treated with selective plasma exchange using fresh frozen plasma. The total bilirubin levels and prothrombin time international normalized ratios decreased significantly after treatment. The total protein, albumin, and fibrinogen levels increased significantly after treatment. Selective plasma exchange may be a useful blood purification therapy for removing causal substances and retaining coagulation factors in patients accompanied with thrombocytopenia.

Plasma exchange-centered artificial liver support system in hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure: a nationwide prospective multicenter study in China

BACKGROUND

Plasma exchange (PE)-centered artificial liver support system reduced the high mortality rate of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). But the data were diverse in different medical centers. The present prospective nationwide study was to evaluate the effects of PE on patients with HBV-ACLF at different stages.

METHODS

From December 2009 to December 2011, we evaluated 250 patients at different stages of HBV-ACLF from 10 major medical centers in China. All the laboratory parameters were collected at admission, before and after PE.

RESULTS

Among the 250 patients who underwent 661 rounds of PE, one-month survival rate was 61.6%; 141 (56.4%) showed improvement after PE. Variables such as age (P=0.000), levels of total bilirubin (TB, P=0.000), direct bilirubin (P=0.000), total triglycerides (P=0.000), low-density lipoprotein (P=0.022), Na+ (P=0.014), Cl- (P=0.038), creatinine (Cr, P=0.007), fibrinogen (P=0.000), prothrombin time (PT, P=0.000), white blood cell (P=0.000), platelet (P=0.003) and MELD (P=0.000) were significantly related to prognosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, disease stage, TB, Cr and PT levels were independent risk factors of mortality among HBV-ACLF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PE can improve the clinical outcome of patients with HBV-ACLF. Levels of TB, Cr and PT, age and disease stage help to predict prognosis.

Effects of plasma exchange using different kinds of frozen plasma in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

AIM: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of plasma exchange using fresh frozen plasma (FFP), frozen plasma (FP) or FFP + FP (1:1) in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

METHODS: One hundred and fourteen patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure hospitalized at our hospital from June 2013 to December 2013 were divided into three groups, including 38 cases who underwent plasma exchange with FFP, 38 cases with FP, and 38 cases with FFP + FP (1:1). Before plasma exchange, we compared the activation of coagulation factors and clotting function of FFP, FP and FFP + FP. Biochemical and clotting indicators before and after plasma exchange in the three groups of patients were tested and compared.

RESULTS: The activation levels of FⅡ:C (104.25% ± 5.43% vs 86.42% ± 8.76% vs 94.95% ± 7.52%) and FⅦ:C (88.26% ± 21.49% vs 89.59% ± 12.10% vs 88.63% ± 14.46%) in FFP, FP and their mixture showed no significantly differences (P > 0.05); however, the activation level of FⅤ:C (103.28% ± 25.32% vs 72.13% ± 21.49% vs 89.98% ± 22.33%), prothrombin time, activated partial prothrombin time, prothrombin activity, international normalized ratio, and the contents of Fig were significantly different (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in clotting and biochemical indicators after plasma exchange, the incidence of adverse reactions during the procedure, rebound percentage of some indicators after 7 d, or the mortality and improvement rates when discharged in the three groups.

CONCLUSION: FFP can be replaced by FP in plasma exchange when there is a shortage of FFP.

Removal of toxic substances by a selective membrane plasma separator

We devised a method of plasma exchange with dialysis (PED), in which selective plasma exchange (sPE) is performed using a selective membrane plasma separator (EC-2A) with an albumin-sieving coefficient of 0.3 while the dialysate flows outside the hollow fibers, and reported the usefulness of the system for treating acute liver failure. Thereafter, EC-4A with an albumin-sieving coefficient of 0.6 was developed, which was expected to be even more effective for removing protein-bound substances. In order to examine whether or not EC-4A might be applicable to blood purification therapy against drug poisoning, we compared the efficacies of sPE, PED, and direct hemoperfusion (DHP) using an activated carbon column for the removal of phenobarbital and lithium. Subjects undergoing the extracorporeal circulation study were assigned to the sPE group, PED group, or DHP group, and the changes in the blood concentrations of phenobarbital and lithium were measured over 180 min. A significant decrease of the phenobarbital concentration over time was seen in the PED group, as compared to that in the sPE group (P < 0.0001), while no significant difference in the concentration was observed between the PED and DHP groups. The PED group showed a significant decrease of the lithium concentration over time, as compared to the DHP group (P < 0.0001), while no significant difference in the concentration was observed between the PED and sPE groups. Thus, PED was as effective as DHP for removing phenobarbital and was as effective as sPE for removing lithium. These results suggest that PED therapy using EC-4A may be a feasible modality for the treatment of drug poisoning.

Liver dialysis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: current and future perspectives

Patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) are known to have a very high mortality rate as the majority of these patients succumb to multiorgan failure. Liver transplant remains the only option for these patients; however, there are problems with its availability, cost and also the complications and side effects associated with immunosuppression. Unlike advanced decompensated liver disease, there is a potential for hepatic regeneration and recovery in patients with ACLF. A liver support system, cell or non-cell based, logically is likely to provide temporary functional support until the donor liver becomes available or the failing liver survives the onslaught of the acute insult and spontaneously regenerates. Understanding the pathogenesis of liver failure and regeneration is essential to define the needs for a support system. Removal of hepatotoxic metabolites and inhibitors of hepatic regeneration by liver dialysis, a non-cell-based hepatic support, could help to provide a suitable microenvironment and support the failing liver. The current systems, i.e., MARS and Prometheus, have failed to show survival benefits in patients with ACLF based on which newer devices with improved functionality are currently under development. However, larger randomized trials are needed to prove whether these devices can enable restoration of the complex dysregulated immune system and impact organ failure and mortality in these patients.