Antiarrhythmic effect of the selective I1-imidazoline receptor modulator moxonidine on ouabain-induced cardiac arrhythmia in guinea pigs

Sophoridine manifests as a leading compound for anti-arrhythmia with multiple ion-channel blocking effects

BACKGROUND

Sophoridine (SR) has shown the potential to be an antiarrhythmic agent. However, SR's electrophysiological properties and druggability research are relatively inadequate, which limits the development of SR as an antiarrhythmic candidate.

PURPOSE

To facilitate the development process of SR as an antiarrhythmic candidate, we performed integrated studies on the electrophysiological properties of SR in vitro and ex vivo to gain more comprehensive insights into the multi-ion channel blocking effects of SR, which provided the foundation for the further drugability studies in antiarrhythmic and safety studies. Firstly, SR's electrophysiological properties and antiarrhythmic potentials were recorded and assessed at the cell and tissue levels by comprehensively integrating the patch clamp with the Electrical and Optical Mapping systems. Subsequently, the antiarrhythmic effects of SR were validated by aconitine and ouabain-induced arrhythmia in vivo. Finally, the safety of SR as an antiarrhythmic candidate compound was evaluated based on the guidelines of the Comprehensive in Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA).

STUDY DESIGN

The antiarrhythmic effect of SR was evaluated at the in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo levels.

METHODS

Isolated primary cardiomyocytes and stable cell lines were prepared to explore the electrophysiologic properties of being a multiple ion-channel blocker in vitro by whole-cell patch clamp. Using electrical and optical mapping, the negative chronotropic effect of SR was determined in langendorff-perfused rat or guinea-pig hearts.The antiarrhythmic activity of SR was assessed by the ex vivo tachyarrhythmia models induced by left coronary artery ligation (LCAL) and isoproterenol (ISO). Canonical models of aconitine and ouabain-induced arrhythmia were used to verify the antiarrhythmic effects in vivo. Finally, the pro-arrhythmic risk of SR was detected in Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes (hSCCMs) using a Microelectrode array (MEA).

RESULTS

Single-cell patch assay validated the multiple ion-channel blockers of SR in transient outward current potassium currents (Ito), l-type calcium currents (ICa-l), and rapid activation delayed rectifier potassium currents (IKr). SR ex vivo depressed heart rates (HR) and ventricular conduction velocity (CV) and prolonged Q-T intervals in a concentration-dependent manner. Consistent with the changes in HRs, SR extended the active time of hearts and increased the action potential duration measured at 90% repolarization (APD90). SR could also significantly lengthen the onset time and curtail the duration of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the ex vivo arrhythmic model induced by LCAL. Meanwhile, SR could also significantly upregulate the programmed electrical stimulation (PES) frequency after the ISO challenge in forming electrical alternans and re-entrant excitation. Furthermore, SR exerted antiarrhythmic effects in the tachyarrhythmia models induced by aconitine and ouabain in vivo. Notably, the pro-arrhythmic risk of SR was shallow for a moderate inhibition of the human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) channel. Moreover, SR prolonged field potential duration (FPDc) of hSCCMs in a concentration-dependent manner without early after depolarization (EAD) and arrhythmia occurrence.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that SR manifested as a multiple ion-channel blocker in the electrophysiological properties and exerts antiarrhythmic effects ex vivo and in vivo. Meanwhile, due to the low pro-arrhythmic risk in the hERG inhibition assay and the induction of EAD, SR has great potential as a leading candidate in the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

Imidazoline Receptor System: The Past, the Present, and the Future

Imidazoline receptors historically referred to a family of nonadrenergic binding sites that recognize compounds with an imidazoline moiety, although this has proven to be an oversimplification. For example, none of the proposed endogenous ligands for imidazoline receptors contain an imidazoline moiety but they are diverse in their chemical structure. Three receptor subtypes (I₁, I₂, and I₃) have been proposed and the understanding of each has seen differing progress over the decades. I₁ receptors partially mediate the central hypotensive effects of clonidine-like drugs. Moxonidine and rilmenidine have better therapeutic profiles (fewer side effects) than clonidine as antihypertensive drugs, thought to be due to their higher I₁/α ₂-adrenoceptor selectivity. Newer I₁ receptor agonists such as LNP599 [3-chloro-2-methyl-phenyl)-(4-methyl-4,5-dihydro-3H-pyrrol-2-yl)-amine hydrochloride] have little to no activity on α ₂-adrenoceptors and demonstrate promising therapeutic potential for hypertension and metabolic syndrome. I₂ receptors associate with several distinct proteins, but the identities of these proteins remain elusive. I₂ receptor agonists have demonstrated various centrally mediated effects including antinociception and neuroprotection. A new I₂ receptor agonist, CR4056 [2-phenyl-6-(1H-imidazol-1yl) quinazoline], demonstrated clear analgesic activity in a recently completed phase II clinical trial and holds great promise as a novel I₂ receptor-based first-in-class nonopioid analgesic. The understanding of I₃ receptors is relatively limited. Existing data suggest that I₃ receptors may represent a binding site at the Kir6.2-subtype ATP-sensitive potassium channels in pancreatic β-cells and may be involved in insulin secretion. Despite the elusive nature of their molecular identities, recent progress on drug discovery targeting imidazoline receptors (I₁ and I₂) demonstrates the exciting potential of these compounds to elicit neuroprotection and to treat various disorders such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and chronic pain.

Sympathetic Nervous System Activation and Its Modulation: Role in Atrial Fibrillation

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) has a significant influence on the structural integrity and electrical conductivity of the atria. Aberrant activation of the sympathetic nervous system can induce heterogeneous changes with arrhythmogenic potential which can result in atrial tachycardia, atrial tachyarrhythmias and atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods to modulate autonomic activity primarily through reduction of sympathetic outflow reduce the incidence of spontaneous or induced atrial arrhythmias in animal models and humans, suggestive of the potential application of such strategies in the management of AF. In this review we focus on the relationship between the ANS, sympathetic overdrive and the pathophysiology of AF, and the potential of sympathetic neuromodulation in the management of AF. We conclude that sympathetic activity plays an important role in the initiation and maintenance of AF, and modulating ANS function is an important therapeutic approach to improve the management of AF in selected categories of patients. Potential therapeutic applications include pharmacological inhibition with central and peripheral sympatholytic agents and various device based approaches. While the role of the sympathetic nervous system has long been recognized, new developments in science and technology in this field promise exciting prospects for the future.

Central Sympathetic Inhibition: a Neglected Approach for Treatment of Cardiac Arrhythmias?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of comorbidities related to AF such as hypertension, congestive heart failure, obesity, insulin resistance, and obstructive sleep apnea. Methods that reduce sympathetic drive, such as centrally acting sympatho-inhibitory agents, have been shown to reduce the incidence of spontaneous or induced atrial arrhythmias, suggesting that neuromodulation may be helpful in controlling AF. Moxonidine acts centrally to reduce activity of the SNS, and clinical trials indicate that this is associated with a decreased AF burden in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal AF and reduced post-ablation recurrence of AF in patients with hypertension who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Furthermore, device-based approaches to reduce sympathetic drive, such as renal denervation, have yielded promising results in the prevention and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. In light of these recent findings, targeting elevated sympathetic drive with either pharmacological or device-based approaches has become a focus of clinical research. Here, we review the data currently available to explore the potential utility of sympatho-inhibitory therapies in the prevention and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.

World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI: a systematic review of medication-induced salivary gland dysfunction

The aim of this paper was to perform a systematic review of the pathogenesis of medication-induced salivary gland dysfunction (MISGD). Review of the identified papers was based on the standards regarding the methodology for systematic reviews set forth by the World Workshop on Oral Medicine IV and the PRISMA statement. Eligible papers were assessed for both the degree and strength of relevance to the pathogenesis of MISGD as well as on the appropriateness of the study design and sample size. A total of 99 papers were retained for the final analysis. MISGD in human studies was generally reported as xerostomia (the sensation of oral dryness) without measurements of salivary secretion rate. Medications may act on the central nervous system (CNS) and/or at the neuroglandular junction on muscarinic, α-and β-adrenergic receptors and certain peptidergic receptors. The types of medications that were most commonly implicated for inducing salivary gland dysfunction were those acting on the nervous, cardiovascular, genitourinary, musculoskeletal, respiratory, and alimentary systems. Although many medications may affect the salivary flow rate and composition, most of the studies considered only xerostomia. Thus, further human studies are necessary to improve our understanding of the association between MISGD and the underlying pathophysiology.

The antiarrhythmic effect of centrally administered rilmenidine involves muscarinic receptors, protein kinase C and mitochondrial signalling pathways

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We have previously demonstrated that stimulation of imidazoline receptors in the CNS prevented halothane-adrenaline arrhythmias during halothane anaesthesia and that stimulation of the vagus nerve may be critical to this effect. However, details of the mechanism(s) involved are not yet available. The present study was designed to examine the role of muscarinic receptors, protein kinase C (PKC), ATP-sensitive potassium channels (K(ATP)) and the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) in the antiarrhythmic effect of rilmenidine, an imidazoline receptor agonist.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Rats were anaesthetized with halothane and monitored continuously for arterial blood pressure and premature ventricular contractions. The arrhythmogenic dose of adrenaline was defined as the lowest dose producing three or more premature ventricular contractions within a 15-s period. We confirmed that centrally administered rilmenidine prevented halothane-adrenaline arrhythmias and then examined the antiarrhythmic effect of rilmenidine in the presence of atropine methylnitrate, a muscarinic receptor antagonist, calphostin C, a PKC inhibitor, HMR-1098, a sarcolemmal K(ATP) inhibitor, 5-hydroxydecanoic acid, a mitochondrial K(ATP) inhibitor or atractyloside, an MPTP opener.

KEY RESULTS

The antiarrhythmic effect of rilmenidine was significantly inhibited by atropine methylnitrate, calphostin C, 5-hydroxydecanoic acid and atractyloside, but the effects of HMR-1098 in our model were not clear.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The present results suggest that muscarinic receptors, PKC, mitochondrial K(ATP) channels and MPTP may be crucial components of the mechanism involved in the antiarrhythmic effect of rilmenidine given into the CNS.

Identification of the Central Imidazoline Receptor Subtype Involved in Modulation of Halothane-Epinephrine Arrhythmias in Rats

We previously reported that imidazoline receptors in the central nervous system are involved in modulation of halothane-epinephrine arrhythmias. These receptors have been subclassified as I1 and I2 subtypes, but it is not known which receptor subtype is involved in halothane-epinephrine-induced arrhythmias. We designed the present study to clarify the involvement of central imidazoline receptor subtype in the modulation of halothane-epinephrine-induced arrhythmias. Rats were anesthetized with halothane and monitored continuously for systemic arterial blood pressure and premature ventricular contractions. The arrhythmogenic dose of epinephrine was defined as the smallest dose that produces three or more premature ventricular contractions within a 15-s period. Intracisternal moxonidine dose-dependently inhibited the epinephrine-induced arrhythmias during halothane anesthesia. Intracisternal efaroxan, a selective I1 antagonist with little affinity for I2 subtype, but not rauwolscine, an alpha2 antagonist without affinity for imidazoline receptors, blocked the antiarrhythmic effect of moxonidine. Intracisternal BU 224 and 2-BFI, selective I2 ligands, also inhibited the epinephrine-induced arrhythmias dose-dependently; however, these effects were abolished by efaroxan. We conclude that central I1, but not I2, receptors play an important role in inhibition of halothane-epinephrine arrhythmia.

Cardiotoxicity of digitalis glycosides: roles of autonomic pathways, autacoids and ion channels

1 Cardiac glycosides have been used for centuries as therapeutic agents for the treatment of heart diseases. In patients with heart failure, digoxin and the other glycosides exert their positive inotropic effect by inhibiting Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase, thereby increasing intracellular sodium, which, in turn, inhibits the Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger and increases intracellular calcium levels. As the therapeutic index of digitalis is narrow, arrhythmias are common problems in clinical practice. The mechanisms and mediators of these arrhythmias, however, are not completely understood. 2 The involvement of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system in digitalis cardiac toxicity is reviewed. 3 Receptors, channels, exchange systems or other cellular components involved in digitalis-induced cardiotoxicity are also reviewed. 4 Possible mediators of digitalis-induced cardiac toxicity are discussed. 5 Management of digitalis toxicity in patients is summarized. 6 The determination of the possible mediators of digitalis-induced cardiac toxicity will enhance our knowledge and lead to the development of new therapeutic strategies to treat these lethal arrhythmias.

Moxonidine: some controversy

Initially it was considered that moxonidine, like clonidine, acted at central (2)-adrenoceptors to reduce blood pressure. With the characterisation of imidazoline binding sites distinct from (2)-adrenoceptors, the consensus became that moxonidine was acting predominantly at imidazoline I(1) receptors in the rostral ventrolateral medulla to lower blood pressure. Moxonidine acts at prejunctional (2)-adrenoceptors on sympathetic nerve endings to decrease noradrenaline release and this may contribute to its ability to lower blood pressure. The predominant site of action of moxonidine may also depend on route of administration, with imidazoline I(1) receptors being predominant after central, and (2)-adrenoceptors predominant after systemic administration. The controversy over the mechanism and site of action with moxonidine is ongoing. In animal models, moxonidine lowers blood pressure, reduces cardiac hypertrophy and remodelling, reduces cardiac arrhythmias and increases blood flow in cerebral ischaemia. Moxonidine also has beneficial effects in animal models of diabetes and kidney disease. Moxonidine increases sodium and water excretion in rats, but not humans. Animal studies indicate that moxonidine may be useful in the treatment of glaucoma by reducing intra-ocular pressure. Animal studies show that moxonidine may also be effective in pain and in ethanol withdrawal. In humans, the pharmacokinetics of moxonidine are of the one-compartment model with first-order absorption. Renal elimination is the major route of elimination and individual titration of moxonidine is needed in patients with renal impairment. There is overwhelming evidence that moxonidine is a safe and effective antihypertensive. A large clinical trial of moxonidine in heart failure, MOXCON, was stopped because of excessive deaths in the moxonidine group. Moxonidine should not be used in patients with heart failure, but there are no obvious reasons to stop its use as an antihypertensive, or its development for other clinical uses.

Imidazoline receptors: a challenge

The hypotensive effect of imidazoline-like drugs (IMs) directly injected into the rostroventrolateral part of the brainstem (NRL/RVLM) was shown to involve non-adrenergic imidazoline specific receptors (IRs). Some IMs caused hypotension when injected there, irrespective of their affinity and selectivity for any alpha-adrenoceptor subtype. Compounds, such as LNP 509, S 23515, S 23757 or benazoline with very high selectivities for IRs over alpha 2-adrenoceptors (A2Rs), became available recently. Some of these compounds (LNP 509, S 23515) caused hypotension when injected alone into the NRL/RVLM region. Nevertheless, high selectivity for IRs will not predict by its own the capability of IMs to elicit hypotension as some of these substances behaved as antagonists towards the hypotensive effects of the latter. As far as hybrid drugs, i.e., with mixed binding profiles (I1/alpha 2), were concerned, a significant correlation has been reported between their central hypotensive effect and their affinity for IRs. Imidazoline antagonists, such as idazoxan, were repeatedly shown to competitively prevent and reverse the centrally induced hypotensive effect of IMs. The sole stimulation of A2Rs within the NRL/RVLM region was not sufficient to decrease blood pressure as much as IMs did, as shown by the lack of significant blood pressure lowering effect of alpha-methylnoradrenaline (alpha-MNA). No correlation was observed between affinity of IMs for A2Rs and their central hypotensive effects. It is also noticeable that yohimbine, an A2Rs antagonist, was repeatedly shown to abolish the hypotensive effect of hybrids but usually in a non-competitive manner. Mutation of A2Rs was shown to prevent the hypotensive effects of centrally acting drugs. It is concluded that (i) drugs highly selective for I1Rs over A2Rs can reduce blood pressure by their own; (ii) the central hypotensive effect of IMs needs implication of IRs and appears to be facilitated by additional activation of A2Rs; and (iii) this effect requires intact A2Rs along the sympathetic pathways.

Facilitation of spontaneous defibrillation by moxonidine during regional ischaemia in an isolated working rabbit heart model

Moxonidine has been shown to be antiarrhythmic during ischaemia in vivo. This study aimed to investigate its electrophysiological effects in isolated working rabbit hearts in vitro. Monophasic action potential duration, effective refractory period and conduction delay were measured at three ventricular sites. The hearts were treated before and during ischaemia and reperfusion with vehicle, moxonidine (0.01, 0.1 and 1 microM) or labetalol (1 microM). In all groups, ventricular fibrillation was always induced during ischaemia. Only 0.1 microM moxonidine decreased the incidence of sustained ventricular fibrillation from 86 to 17%, although it did not affect any electrophysiological parameters measured. Similarly, labetolol, an adrenoceptor blocker, facilitated spontaneous defibrillation without any electrophysiological effects. In conclusion, moxonidine directly facilitates spontaneous defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation during ischaemia. Since the same effect is observed with labetalol, it is possible that the defibrillatory action of moxonidine is related to its peripheral antiadrenergic activity, although other mechanisms cannot be excluded.

alpha-2 and imidazoline receptor agonists. Their pharmacology and therapeutic role

Clonidine has proved to be a clinically useful adjunct in clinical anaesthetic practice as well as in chronic pain therapy because it has both anaesthetic and analgesic-sparing activity. The more selective alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists, dexmedetomidine and mivazerol, may also have a role in providing haemodynamic stability in patients who are at risk of peri-operative ischaemia. The side-effects of hypotension and bradycardia have limited the routine use of alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists. Investigations into the molecular pharmacology of alpha-2 adrenoceptors have elucidated their role in the control of wakefulness, blood pressure and antinociception. We discuss the pharmacology of alpha-2 adrenoceptors and their therapeutic role in this review. The alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists are agonists at imidazoline receptors which are involved in central blood pressure control. Selective imidazoline agonists are now available for clinical use as antihypertensive agents and their pharmacology is discussed.

Imidazoline binding sites and receptors in cardiovascular tissue

1. Imidazoline binding sites and receptors and their endogenous ligands have been identified in cardiovascular tissue of various species including human beings. 2. I2- (but only exceptionally I1-)imidazoline binding sites have been shown to exist on cardiac myocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells; at present, their functional role is unknown. 3. The sympathetic nerves supplying the cardiovascular system are endowed with presynaptic inhibitory imidazoline receptors that may become of therapeutic relevance as targets of drugs. 4. ATP-sensitive K+ channels present in heart and blood vessels can be blocked by several imidazolines and guanidines; hence, those drugs can interfere with the cardioprotective effects resulting from K(ATP) channel activation by a decrease in the endogenous ligand ATP or by drugs. 5. Imidazoline derivatives exhibit antiarrhythmic properties that are due to a reduction of sympathetic tone by central and peripheral mechanisms and to blockade of postsynaptic alpha2-adrenoceptors in the heart and coronary arteries. 6. Agmatine and clonidine-displacing substance, which are endogenous ligands at imidazoline and alpha2-receptors, are present in the blood serum and appear to participate in vascular smooth muscle proliferation and blood pressure regulation.

Does a second generation of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs really exist?

The site of the hypotensive action of imidazoline compounds, such as clonidine, was first identified within the rostroventrolateral part of the brainstem: the nucleus reticularis lateralis. After that, it was shown that imidazolines and related substances reduced blood pressure when applied in this area whereas catecholamines were not capable of producing such an effect. These data led us to suggest the existence of receptors specific for imidazoline-like compounds different from the alpha2-adrenoceptors. Soon after, the existence of imidazoline binding sites was reported in the brain and in a variety of peripheral tissues including the human kidney. As expected, these specific binding sites do not bind the catecholamines. The imidazoline binding sites are already subclassified in two groups: the I1-subtype sensitive to clonidine and idazoxan, and the I2-subtype, sensitive to idazoxan and nearly insensitive to clonidine. Functional studies confirmed that the hypotensive effects of clonidine-like drugs involved imidazoline receptors while their most frequent side effects only involved alpha2-adrenoceptors. However, recent functional evidence suggests that a cross talk between imidazoline receptors and alpha2-adrenoceptors is necessary to trigger a hypotensive effect within the ventral brainstem. Rilmenidine and Moxonidine are the leader compounds of a new class of antihypertensive drugs selective for imidazoline receptors. At hypotensive doses, these drugs are devoid of significant sedative effect. Rilmenidine evoked hypotension when injected within the nucleus reticularis lateralis region; it competed for [3H]-clonidine bound to specific imidazoline binding sites in human medullary membrane preparations but proved more selective for cerebral imidazoline receptors than clonidine. It is suggested that this selectivity might explain the low incidence of their side effects. Additional potentially beneficial actions on cardiac arrhythmias or congestive heart failure enlarge the therapeutic interest of imidazoline-related drugs. Recent binding and functional data throw a new light on the optimal pharmacological profile of this second generation of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs.