Serological evidence of exposure to tick fever organisms in young cattle on Queensland dairy farms

Can herd seroprevalence be used as an indicator of enzootic stability for bovine anaplasmosis? Insights from a case-control field study in Brazil

Bovine anaplasmosis presents a significant challenge to livestock production in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions. For many years, the concept of enzootic stability/instability (initially established for babesiosis) and herd seroprevalence as an indicator of outbreak risks have been applied to anaplasmosis. However, this model has never been definitively validated for Anaplasma marginale. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between herd immunity (seroprevalence) and the occurrence of anaplasmosis outbreaks in Southern Brazil. A case-control study was conducted, categorizing farms into two groups: cases (farms with a history of clinical anaplasmosis) and controls (those without anaplasmosis). Thirteen farms were identified as "cases", while 23 were identified as "controls". A substantial difference in seroprevalence distribution between the two groups was observed. The majority of "control" farms exhibited over 75% of animals with antibodies to A. marginale in both calves and heifers, whereas the majority of "case" farms had a seropositive cattle percentage below 75%. Additionally, twelve months after cattle serology tests, we conducted a prospective follow-up survey to identify any clinical cases of anaplasmosis. Statistical associations (P < 0.05) were found between both retrospective and prospective anaplasmosis outbreaks and the hypothetical threshold of herd seroprevalence (75%). We hypothesize that herd seroprevalence may be an indicator of the risk of occurrence of clinical anaplasmosis. It appears that the epidemiology of cattle anaplasmosis, at least in our conditions, aligns with the well-known model of enzootic stability/instability originally applied to bovine babesiosis.

Genetic diversity in Babesia bovis from southern Africa and estimation of B. bovis infection levels in cattle using an optimised quantitative PCR assay

Babesia bovis is a causal agent of bovine babesiosis, a disease which leads to mortality and morbidity and impacts the cattle industry worldwide. We amplified, cloned and sequenced the B. bovis merozoite surface antigen-2b (msa-2b) gene (_∼940 bp) and the near full-length 18S rRNA gene (_∼1600 bp) from cattle samples from South Africa and Mozambique to determine sequence variation between B. bovis parasites in the region. A TaqMan quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assay (18S rRNA gene) was optimised for the detection of B. bovis and estimation of parasitaemia in field samples from cattle from southern Africa. Phylogenetic analysis grouped the Msa-2b sequences in six clades and these were 59.7 to 99.6% identical to reference sequences. Sequence variation amongst B. bovis 18S rRNA sequences was found at 2 to 36 positions, and the sequences were 97 to 99% identical to published sequences. Mismatches between the B. bovis 18S rRNA sequences and a previously published qPCR forward primer (BoF) were observed; therefore, we developed a new forward primer (BoF2), and optimised the qPCR assay. Six 10-fold dilution series of B. bovis infected erythrocytes (2 × 10⁸ to 2 × 10³ infected red blood cells [iRBC]/ml) were analysed in triplicate in each of six separate qPCR runs, to determine the efficiency of the assay. The qPCR assay amplified the B. bovis 18S rRNA gene with 92.0 to 94.9% efficiency. The detection limit of the qPCR assay was approximately 6 iRBCs/μl. The performance of the optimised assay to diagnose B. bovis in field samples was assessed by testing DNA from 222 field samples of cattle from South Africa and Mozambique using three methods: the optimised qPCR assay, the reverse line blot (RLB) hybridisation assay, and the previously published qPCR assay. The detection rate of B. bovis using the optimised qPCR assay (31.1%, 69/222) was significantly higher (p<0.001) than both that using RLB (20.7%, 46/222) and the previously published qPCR assay (5.4%; 12/222). The B. bovis parasitaemia in samples from infected cattle ranged from 6 iRBCs/μl to 101,852 iRBCs/μl of blood. Our study revealed marked sequence variation between B. bovis parasites from southern Africa. The optimised qPCR assay will be useful in epidemiological studies and clinical diagnosis of B. bovis in southern Africa, and can be used to determine parasitaemia and potential carrier status in cattle populations, which is essential in the control of babesiosis.

Harnessing Mycobacterium bovis BCG Trained Immunity to Control Human and Bovine Babesiosis

Babesiosis is a disease caused by tickborne hemoprotozoan apicomplexan parasites of the genus Babesia that negatively impacts public health and food security worldwide. Development of effective and sustainable vaccines against babesiosis is currently hindered in part by the absence of definitive host correlates of protection. Despite that, studies in Babesia microti and Babesia bovis, major causative agents of human and bovine babesiosis, respectively, suggest that early activation of innate immune responses is crucial for vertebrates to survive acute infection. Trained immunity (TI) is defined as the development of memory in vertebrate innate immune cells, allowing more efficient responses to subsequent specific and non-specific challenges. Considering that Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), a widely used anti-tuberculosis attenuated vaccine, induces strong TI pro-inflammatory responses, we hypothesize that BCG TI may protect vertebrates against acute babesiosis. This premise is supported by early investigations demonstrating that BCG inoculation protects mice against experimental B. microti infection and recent observations that BCG vaccination decreases the severity of malaria in children infected with Plasmodium falciparum, a Babesia-related parasite. We also discuss the potential use of TI in conjunction with recombinant BCG vaccines expressing Babesia immunogens. In conclusion, by concentrating on human and bovine babesiosis, herein we intend to raise awareness of BCG TI as a strategy to efficiently control Babesia infection.

Eradication and control of livestock ticks: biological, economic and social perspectives

Comparisons of successful and failed attempts to eradicate livestock ticks reveal that the social context of farming and management of the campaigns have greater influence than techniques of treatment. The biology of ticks is considered principally where it has contributed to control of ticks as practiced on farms. The timing of treatments by life cycle and season can be exploited to reduce numbers of treatments per year. Pastures can be managed to starve and desiccate vulnerable larvae questing on vegetation. Immunity to ticks acquired by hosts can be enhanced by livestock breeding. The aggregated distribution of ticks on hosts with poor immunity can be used to select animals for removal from the herd. Models of tick population dynamics required for predicting outcomes of control methods need better understanding of drivers of distribution, aggregation, stability, and density-dependent mortality. Changing social circumstances, especially of land-use, has an influence on exposure to tick-borne pathogens that can be exploited for disease control.

Productivity and health effects of anaplasmosis and babesiosis on Bos indicus cattle and their crosses, and the effects of differing intensity of tick control in Australia

Tick fever is an important disease of cattle where Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus acts as a vector for the three causal organisms Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina and Anaplasma marginale. Bos indicus cattle and their crosses are more resistant to the clinical effects of infection with B. bovis and B. bigemina than are Bos taurus cattle. Resistance is not complete, however, and herds of B. indicus-cross cattle are still at risk of babesiosis in environments where exposure to B. bovis is light in most years but occasionally high. The susceptibility of B. indicus cattle and their crosses to infection with A. marginale is similar to that of B. taurus cattle. In herds of B. indicus cattle and their crosses the infection rate of Babesia spp. and A. marginale is lowered because fewer ticks are likely to attach per day due to reduced numbers of ticks in the field (long-term effect on population, arising from high host resistance) and because a smaller proportion of ticks that do develop to feed on infected cattle will in turn be infected (due to lower parasitaemia). As a consequence, herds of B. indicus cattle are less likely than herds of B. taurus cattle to have high levels of population immunity to babesiosis or anaplasmosis. The effects of acaricide application on the probability of clinical disease due to anaplasmosis and babesiosis are unpredictable and dependent on the prevalence of infection in ticks and in cattle at the time of application. Attempting to manipulate population immunity through the toleration of specific threshold numbers of ticks with the aim of controlling tick fever is not reliable and the justification for acaricide application should be for the control of ticks rather than for tick fever. Vaccination of B. indicus cattle and their crosses is advisable in all areas where ticks exist, although vaccination against B. bigemina is probably not essential in pure B. indicus animals.

Importance of ticks and their chemical and immunological control in livestock

The medical and economic importance of ticks has long been recognized due to their ability to transmit diseases to humans and animals. Ticks cause great economic losses to livestock, and adversely affect livestock hosts in several ways. Loss of blood is a direct effect of ticks acting as potential vector for haemo-protozoa and helminth parasites. Blood sucking by large numbers of ticks causes reduction in live weight and anemia among domestic animals, while their bites also reduce the quality of hides. However, major losses caused by ticks are due to their ability to transmit protozoan, rickettsial and viral diseases of livestock, which are of great economic importance world-wide. There are quite a few methods for controlling ticks, but every method has certain shortcomings. The present review is focused on ticks importance and their control.

Babesiosis of cattle

Tick fever or cattle fever (babesiosis) is economically the most important arthropod-borne disease of cattle worldwide with vast areas of Australia, Africa, South and Central America and the United States continuously under threat. Tick fever was the first disease for which transmission by an arthropod to a mammal was implicated at the turn of the twentieth century and is the first disease to be eradicated from a continent (North America). This review describes the biology of Babesia spp. in the host and the tick, the scale of the problem to the cattle industry, the various components of control programmes, epidemiology, pathogenesis, immunity, vaccination and future research. The emphasis is on Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina.

Tick control: Thoughts on a research agenda

Tick control is critical to the control of tick borne disease, while the direct impact of ticks on livestock productivity is also well known. For livestock, tick control today rests overwhelmingly on the twin approaches of genetics and chemical acaricides, although the disadvantages and limitations of both are recognized. The achievement of the full potential of vaccination, the application of biocontrol agents and the coordinated management of the existing technologies all pose challenging research problems. Progress in many areas has been steady over the last decade, while the acquisition of molecular information has now reached a revolutionary stage. This is likely to have immediate impact on the identification of potential antigens for improved vaccines and novel targets for acaricide action. In many circumstances, the rate limiting step in making scientific progress will remain unchanged, namely the resource constraint on evaluating these appropriately in large animals. For other approaches, such as the use of biocontrol agents, the limitation is likely to be less in the identification of suitable agents than in their delivery in an efficient and cost effective way. Our scientific understanding of the molecular basis for the tick vector-tick borne disease interaction is in its infancy but the area is both challenging and, in the long term, likely to be of great practical importance. What is arguably the most difficult problem of all remains: the translation of laboratory research into the extremely diverse parasite control requirements of farming systems in a way that is practically useful.