Beyond the maze

Measuring support for tobacco control policy in selected areas of six countries

OBJECTIVE

To explore the validity, reliability, and applicability of using a short, psychometrically sound survey instrument to measure population attitudes toward tobacco control policies.

DESIGN

Surveys.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

Student respondents attending university in Australia (n = 403), Hong Kong (n = 336), the Netherlands (n = 351), South Africa (n = 291), the United Kingdom (n = 164) and the United States (n = 241); total n = 1786.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The Smoking Policy Inventory (SPI), a 35-item scale. SPI scores were adjusted for age, income, gender, and smoking status. Estimates of internal consistency and tests of factorial invariance were conducted in each sample.

RESULTS

Across all six countries, the SPI was found to be highly reliable and to have a consistent factor structure, indicating that the SPI scale represents a higher order construct that assesses general attitudes about tobacco control policy with five dimensions. In general, the degree of endorsement of anti-tobacco policies as measured by the SPI reflected the extent and strength of tobacco control legislation in those countries. Dutch students were the least likely, and Australian and Hong Kong students the most likely, to support tobacco control policies.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to develop appropriate and meaningful measurement tools for assessing support of tobacco control policies. Strong evidence was found for internal reliability and structural invariance of the SPI. The SPI may be a useful mechanism for monitoring ongoing policy initiatives, making cross-cultural comparisons, and evaluating population receptiveness to proposed policy approaches.

Resource requirements to develop a large, remote aboriginal health service: whose responsibility?

In 1994 the Commonwealth funded studies to establish and develop Aboriginal health services. One such study was undertaken in 1995 at Maningrida, Northern Territory: to identify the health-service needs of the population and consider community management structures; to identify Northern Territory expenditure for primary health care; and to provide a three- to five-year development budget. Approximately 2100 Aboriginal residents in the region used the service, including 750 living on 24 outstations within 75 km. Nearly 40 per cent were aged under 15 years. Childhood morbidity was high, with children under two averaging 1.4 hospital admissions per year. The age pyramid reflected premature adult mortality from the third decade of life. Service providers identified inadequate staffing and infrastructure as barriers to service development. Community consultations emphasised the need for resident doctors, improved outstation services and aged and respite care, local training for Aboriginal health workers and housing for staff. These developments would require per capita primary health care expenditure ($872) to be doubled. Aboriginal people in remote areas are disadvantaged through Commonwealth Grants Commission funding formulae and lack of Medicare access. As the sole funding source, the Northern Territory spends over $1.83 million per year providing health services at Maningrida. Additionally, the study proposed that the Commonwealth spend $1.96 million a year over five years on staffing and infrastructure. Local Aboriginal organisations also agreed to allocate resources for health service development. Ineffective implementation, lack of clarification of government responsibilities and funding shortfalls remain barriers to developing remote Aboriginal health services.

Healthy aboriginal communities

Improving the health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations is the greatest challenge facing public health in Australia today. The gains in the health of the population overall have not been matched by gains among these communities. Much of the information about the health of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and people is negative, and little information is available about what Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people themselves consider to be indicators of healthy people and healthy communities. This paper identifies some successful programs and highlights the need for community ownership of decisions about goals, services and programs. By looking to ways that Aboriginal people view their health (and its determinants), and to the examples of successful action to date, it is possible to begin to develop a vision of healthy Aboriginal communities in which the relationship between body, land and spirit has been restored. The need, now, is to build the partnerships that will be necessary to turn the vision into reality.