Comparison of efficacy of concomitant administration of mitiglinide with voglibose and double dose of mitiglinide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Comparative effects of fixed-dose mitiglinide/voglibose combination and glimepiride on vascular endothelial function and glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of mitiglinide/voglibose with those of glimepiride on glycemic variability and vascular endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, crossover study. Hospitalized patients received either mitiglinide/voglibose (three times daily administration of 10 mg mitiglinide and 0.2 mg voglibose) or glimepiride (once-daily 2 mg) in random order, each for 5 days. The reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) were measured as co-primary endpoints using reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry and continuous glucose monitoring.

RESULTS

The analysis included 30 patients (15 in each group). The RHI was 1.670 ± 0.369 during treatment with mitiglinide/voglibose and 1.716 ± 0.492 during treatment with glimepiride, with no significant difference between the two. MAGE was significantly lower in the mitiglinide/voglibose group (47.6 ± 18.5 mg/dL) than in the glimepiride group (100.6 ± 32.2 mg/dL). Although the mean blood glucose levels over the entire 24 h period were comparable between the two groups, the use of mitiglinide/voglibose was associated with a lower standard deviation of mean glucose, coefficient of variation, and mean postprandial glucose excursion compared with glimepiride. The time below range (<70 mg/dL) and the time above range (>180, >200, and 250 mg/dL) were lower in the mitiglinide/voglibose group, while the time in range (70-180 mg/dL) was higher.

CONCLUSIONS

In our short-duration randomized crossover study, although not impacting vascular endothelial function, mitiglinide/voglibose demonstrated potential benefits in reducing glycemic variability, postprandial hyperglycemia, and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The efficacy of switching basal-bolus insulin therapy to basal insulin-supported oral therapy with a glinide and an α-glucosidase inhibitor in patients with type 2 diabetes depends on insulin secretory capacity, but not on blood glucose profiles and insulin dosages prior to the switching

Aims

We aimed to identify patients who would benefit from basal insulin-supported oral therapy (BOT) with a glinide and an α-glucosidase inhibitor (a fixed-dose combination tablet of mitiglinide 10 mg and voglibose 0.2 mg) in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients.

Methods

Patients who were hospitalized to improve hyperglycemia received basal-bolus insulin therapy. After the reduction of glucose toxicity, a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test and a glucagon test were performed. Thereafter, the basal-bolus insulin therapy was switched to BOT with mitiglinide, followed by further addition of voglibose. Interstitial glucose levels were continuously monitored throughout the study period. Diurnal glucose profile was recorded and analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether their percentage of time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL) under BOT with mitiglinide/voglibose was higher than 70% or not, and the differences in clinical characteristics between the groups were analyzed.

Results

Twenty patients were enrolled, and 19 of them completed the study. BOT with mitiglinide/voglibose achieved ≥ 70% of TIR in thirteen patients. The area under the curve of serum C-peptide levels during the oral glucose tolerance test was significantly higher in the patients with ≥ 70% of TIR. The daily insulin dosages and blood glucose profiles were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions

The efficacy of BOT with mitiglinide/voglibose depended on residual insulin secretory abilities. This therapy would be a useful therapeutic option for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Repaglinide Versus the Combination of Mitiglinide and Voglibose on Glycemic Variability in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Glycemic variability is a risk factor for total death and cardiovascular events. There are no obvious guidelines for the direct treatment of glycemic variability, but it can be improved with the treatment of postprandial hyperglycemia.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effect of repaglinide versus the combination of mitiglinide and voglibose, used to improve postprandial hyperglycemia, on glycemic variability in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We performed an open-label randomized cross-over trial between April 2016 and April 2018. Patients with type 2 diabetes who were admitted to our hospital were enrolled in our study (n = 12). Glycemic variability. was assessed using a continuous glucose monitoring system.

RESULTS

The average glucose level of the repaglinide phase (146.1 ± 20.7 mg/dl) and the combination of mitiglinide and voglibose phase (132.3 ± 19.8 mg/dl) were similar (P = 0.10). The standard division (P = 0.0005), coefficient of variation (P = 0.006), and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (P = 0.002) of glucose were lower in the combination of mitiglinide and voglibose phase than in the repaglinide phase.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with the combination of mitiglinide and voglibose might be more effective than repaglinide for the improvement of glycemic variability.

Comparison Between Effectiveness of 100 mg/day Sitagliptin and a Switch to Mitiglinide Calcium Hydrate/Voglibose from 50 mg/day Sitagliptin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

We analyzed the effects of 100 mg/day sitagliptin and a switch to mitiglinide calcium hydrate/voglibose compound tablets (MIT/VOG) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with 50 mg/day sitagliptin. Five patients with T2DM treated with 50 mg/day sitagliptin and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of ≥6.5% were switched to MIT/VOG, or the dose of sitagliptin was increased to 100 mg/day. The effects of the changes in therapy were compared in a crossover fashion by continuous glucose monitoring. The primary endpoint was mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and the secondary end points were 24-hour mean blood glucose level and mean blood glucose level from 0:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. and from 7:00 a.m. to 0:00 a.m., percentage of time with blood glucose level of ≥200 mg/dl and <70 mg/dl, maximum and minimum blood glucose levels, and increases in postprandial blood glucose levels. MAGE was significantly lower with MIT/VOG (P = 0.016), whereas mean blood glucose levels were lower between 0:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. with 100 mg/day sitagliptin. The percentage of time with blood glucose level ≥200 mg/dl was significantly shorter with MIT/VOG (P = 0.041). The maximum blood glucose level was significantly lower with MIT/VOG (P = 0.043), and the minimum was significantly lower with 100 mg/day sitagliptin (P = 0.043). Blood glucose levels after dinner and mean increases in postprandial blood glucose levels were significantly lower with MIT/VOG (P = 0.090 and P = 0.045 respectively). In patients with T2DM, treatment with MIT/VOG improves MAGE and postprandial hyperglycemia and 100 mg/day sitagliptin lowers early morning glucose levels. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) (No. UMIN R000008274).

The glycemic/metabolic responses to meal tolerance tests at breakfast, lunch and dinner, and effects of the mitiglinide/voglibose fixed-dose combination on postprandial profiles in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Meal tolerance tests (MTTs) are usually conducted at breakfast after overnight fasting in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, but differences in postprandial glycemic responses between meals have been reported.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted MTTs at breakfast, lunch, and dinner to examine the effects of a fixed combination of 10 mg mitiglinide/0.2 mg voglibose (the combination) on glycemic/metabolic responses to meals during the day in T2DM patients. MTTs with unified meals were conducted in 11 T2DM patients before and after 4 weeks of treatment with the combination administered thrice daily before meals. Glycemic/metabolic profiles measured before and at 30, 60, and 120 min after each meal were compared between each meal and between the baseline and treatment periods.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The combination significantly reduced postprandial hyperglycemia after each meal. Postprandial AUC0 - 120 min for insulin significantly decreased after lunch and dinner compared with after breakfast, while insulin levels significantly increased at only 30 min after breakfast and dinner. The combination also significantly increased postprandial C-peptide and active glucagon-like peptide-1 levels, and reduced free fatty acid and triglyceride levels, but did not significantly affect glucagon levels compared with baseline, confirming that treatment with the combination improves postprandial responses in Japanese T2DM patients.

Effects of combination therapy with mitiglinide and voglibose on postprandial plasma glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at increased risk from cardiovascular-related morbidity and mortality as compared with healthy individuals. An association between the postprandial metabolic state and atherogenesis has been observed in patients with diabetes mellitus. In the Study to Prevent Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus (STOP-NIDDM), treatment with an α-glucosidase inhibitor (α-GI) in patients with impaired glucose tolerance not only reduced the rate of conversion from impaired glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but was also associated with a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events. These results suggested the importance of treating postprandial hyperglycemia in the early stages of T2DM. Glinides are rapid and short-acting insulin secretagogues that bind to the sulfonylurea receptors on pancreatic β-cells to facilitate rapid insulin secretion, restore postprandial early insulin secretion, and reduce the postprandial glucose spike. Moreover, α-GIs reduce postprandial hyperglycemia and insulin secretion by delaying the digestion of carbohydrates and polysaccharides in the small intestine. Then, both glinides and α-GI have beneficial effects for treating patients with T2DM and impaired glucose tolerance. Considering the ameliorating effects of these drugs on postprandial metabolic disorders, combinations of glinides and α-GI might constitute a promising therapeutic strategy for managing patients with T2DM, and also appear to be suitable for Japanese people, who consume more carbohydrates, such as polished rice, than Caucasians. It has recently been reported that combined use of mitiglinide and voglibose reduces postprandial insulin secretion and blunts diurnal glycemic changes in T2DM patients. This therapy can thus be regarded as being suitable for achieving strict postprandial glycemic control. In this report, we outline the effects of this combination therapy on postprandial plasma glucose and assess its safety.

Concomitant use of miglitol and mitiglinide as initial combination therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of miglitol and mitiglinide alone or in combination on the metabolic profile and incretin secretion in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients.

METHODS

Patients on diet and exercise with or without metformin, were randomized to receive either miglitol, mitiglinide, or a combination, three times daily for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, HbA1c decreased significantly (p<0.001) and 1,5-AG increased significantly (p<0.001) in all three groups, with the greatest change seen with combination therapy. Effective improvement of postprandial hyperglycemia was demonstrated by a meal-loading test in all three interventions but serum insulin concentration was not increased by miglitol. In a subset of patients without prior metformin administration, faster and better glycemic control was achieved with the initial combination. After meal loading, serum total GLP-1 significantly increased only with miglitol monotherapy (p<0.05) and serum total GIP significantly decreased (p<0.01) in the arms employing miglitol after 12 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Miglitol/mitiglinide combination is more potent than monotherapy in improving glycemic control through the reduction of postprandial glucose excursion and the simultaneous sparing of additional insulin secretion. A marked difference in the effects of miglitol and mitiglinide on incretin secretion was also demonstrated.

Mitiglinide/voglibose fixed-dose combination improves postprandial glycemic excursions in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

We examined the effects of a fixed-dose combination of 10 mg mitiglinide and 0.2 mg voglibose on postprandial glycemic excursions in Japanese type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

After a 2-week baseline period, 11 T2DM patients were treated with mitiglinide alone for 2 weeks and with the mitiglinide/voglibose combination for 6 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) at home before and after unified meals, metabolic parameters during meal tolerance tests, and overall glycemic control parameters.

RESULTS

Postprandial glycemic excursions after all three meals, as assessed by SMBG, were significantly lower in the combination period than in the baseline period, and after lunch and dinner in the combination period than in the mitiglinide period. The meal tolerance test confirmed that the magnitude of postprandial hyperglycemia was significantly lower, with significantly greater early-phase serum insulin secretion and sustained GLP-1 production, in the combination period compared with the baseline period. Overall glycemic control parameters also improved significantly in the combination period compared with the baseline period. These profiles suggest the combination is superior to mitiglinide alone, and may spare insulin secretion.

CONCLUSION

The mitiglinide/voglibose combination significantly reduced postprandial glycemic excursions in Japanese T2DM patients. This trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network clinical trials database (no. UMIN000007202).