Adanu KK, Iroko D, Amegan-Aho K, Adedia D, Ndudiri OV, Ali MA, Oyortey MA, Kpodonu J. Comparing the effectiveness and lubricity of a novel Shea lubricant to 2% lidocaine gel for digital rectal examination: a randomized non-inferiority trial.
Sci Rep 2023;
13:4666. [PMID:
36949085 PMCID:
PMC10033511 DOI:
10.1038/s41598-023-31555-2]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
This study compared the level of lubricity and pain reduction of a novel shea lubricant to 2% lidocaine gel during digital rectal examination (DRE). Our research group performed a 9-week single-blind non-inferiority trial at the Ho Teaching Hospital involving 153 patients. The primary outcome measure was the mean pain difference during the procedure using a Visual Analogue Scale. 75 and 78 patients were randomized to the shea lubricant and 2% lidocaine gel groups respectively. The analysis considered the per-protocol population. The mean pain difference at endpoint was Δ - 0.01. The 95% lower confidence interval was a -0.595 difference in means, above the non-inferiority (NI) limit of - 0.720, thus establishing non-inferiority (Δ - 0.01, 95% CI - 0.59 to 0.57, NI - 0.72). With secondary outcome measures, perianal pruritus (p = 0.728), discomfort (p = 0.446), bowel urgency (p = 0.077) and urinary urgency (p = 0.841) were similar during the procedure. Shea lubricant had better lubricity and ease of use (p = 0.002). While the novel shea lubricant achieved similar level of pain reduction as obtained with 2% lidocaine gel, it had better ease of performance and lubricity.
Collapse