The effect of dosage on the bioavailability of chlorothiazide administered in solution

Renal effects of nifedipine in healthy normotensive volunteers. Effects of dose, formulation, duration of treatment, and chlorothiazide coadministration

Renal effects of nifedipine were assessed in 3 groups of healthy normotensive volunteers. In the first group (N = 10), a single 20-mg dose of the slow-release formulation caused an increase in 8-h sodium excretion (P less than 0.025) and urine volume (P less than 0.005). Natriuresis (P less than 0.05) and diuresis (P less than 0.05) were still evident after 1 wk of pretreatment, but were significantly attenuated (P less than 0.05), in each case, compared to levels after a single dose. Natriuresis and diuresis after 2 wk of intake were indistinguishable from control levels. In another group of 8, a single 10 mg dose of the conventional formulation (capsule) effected natriuresis (P less than 0.01) and diuresis (P less than 0.001) similar to those associated with intake of a single 20-mg dose of the slow-release formulation. Natriuresis and diuresis associated with a 20-mg single dose of the conventional formulation were not different from control but were less than those following intake of the 10-mg dose (P less than 0.025 in each case). In the third group of 6, nifedipine, though weaker than chlorothiazide, promoted natriuresis (P less than 0.025) and diuresis (P less than 0.025) of the thiazide without augmenting its kaliuresis. In all the groups, there were no changes in creatinine clearance, and nifedipine did not alter kaliuresis. It is suggested that natriuretic and diuretic effects of nifedipine in healthy normotensive individuals are dependent on the dose employed, the formulation used, and the duration of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The phenomenon and cause of the dose-dependent oral absorption of chlorothiazide in rats: extrapolation to human data based on the body surface area concept

The reported incomplete and dose-dependent absorption of chlorothiazide in humans was demonstrated in six rats after five oral solutions at doses of 0.93, 2.55, 9.23, 25.6, and 70.2 mg/kg. Mean 48-hr urinary recoveries of intact drug were 57.3, 50.4, 36.7, 22.8, and 15.3%, respectively. A similar degree of dose dependency in absorption was found in rat, dog, and human when the doses were related to unit body surface area (BSA) but not on unit body weight, indicating similar interspecies absorptive capacity in terms of unit BSA. This finding may be partly rationalized by marked similarities in the reported solution transit time (2-3 hr) in the small intestine as well as in the calculated gross surface area of the small intestine per unit BSA (0.163 for rat and 0.132 for human). Contrary to the previous postulation of a specific absorption site, the drug was absorbed from different regions of the GI tract with apparent 1-hr absorption rates, studied by the in situ closed-loop method, in the following rank order: jejunum (34.6%) greater than duodenum (32.7%) greater than large intestine (20.1%) greater than ileum (18.0%) greater than stomach (12.4%). Different from the commonly assumed first-order absorption process, the intestinal loop absorption was concentration-dependent, suggesting a saturable mechanism. For example, the absorption rate at 0.008 mg/mL was higher than that at 0.2 mg/mL in ileal loops (61%, p less than 0.01) and jejunal loops (22%, p less than 0.1). In addition, the absorption rates at pH 6 and 7.4 were statistically identical, indicating a lack of ionization effect that is important in the passive absorption process. The solubility-limited absorption could probably be ruled out at doses below 2.55 mg/kg for rat and 125 mg for human in view of higher aqueous solubilities at 37 degrees C (e.g., 1.3 mg/mL at pH 7) found in the present study. Contrary to the previous hypothesis of low membrane permeability as a limiting factor for absorption, the "intrinsic" partition coefficient in 1-octanol/aqueous buffer was moderate, 0.6. Furthermore, the absorption in ileal and jejunal loops was enhanced by an apparent increase in mesenteric blood flow by caffeine. The existence of prolonged oral absorption in rats and humans is discussed.

The effect of beta-adrenoceptor blockers on the absorption and excretion of chlorothiazide in man

The effect of beta-adrenoceptor blockers on the absorption and elimination of the diuretic chlorothiazide was studied in healthy subjects. A week of pretreatment with either pindolol (10 mg twice daily) or propranolol (80 mg twice daily) resulted in significant reduction in 36 h mean cumulative urinary recovery of chlorothiazide in two groups of six subjects compared with a control (untreated) group. A week of pretreatment with atenolol (100 mg daily) did not significantly alter 36 h cumulative urinary excretion in another group of six subjects. None of the beta-blockers significantly changed chlorothiazide half-life. It is suggested that the non-selective (as opposed to the cardioselective) beta-blockers reduce chlorothiazide absorption by the mechanism(s) discussed.

Michaelis-Menten absorption kinetics in drugs: - examples and implications

It is shown that the absorption of phenylbutazone, naproxen, and chlorthiazide is governed by a dose limiting mechanism. This dose dependency may be explained by a saturation absorption process mathematically obeying Michaelis-Menten type kinetics. Observed dose relationships for tetracycline, fenclozic acid and related compounds, phenytoin, and possibly digoxin and digitoxin may be explained if a saturable process in absorption is postulated. This behavior may be produced by insolubility of the drug compound, a limited "window of absorption" in the gastrointestinal tract, or a capacity limited absorption because of the carrier or the transport mechanism involved. The need for suitably designed dose response studies with new drug compounds is discussed.