1
|
Contributions of causal reasoning to early scientific literacy. J Exp Child Psychol 2022; 224:105509. [PMID: 35850022 DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Although early causal reasoning has been studied extensively, inconsistency in the tasks used to assess it has clouded our understanding of its structure, development, and relevance to broader developmental outcomes. The current research attempted to bring clarity to these questions by exploring patterns of performance across several commonly used measures of causal reasoning, and their relation to scientific literacy, in a sample of 3- to 5-year-old children from diverse backgrounds (N = 153). A longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis revealed that some measures of causal reasoning (counterfactual reasoning, causal learning, and causal inference), but not all of them (tracking cause-effect associations and resolving confounded evidence), assess a unidimensional factor and that this resulting factor was relatively stable across time. A cross-lagged panel model analysis revealed associations between causal reasoning and scientific literacy across each age tested. Causal reasoning and scientific literacy related to each other concurrently, and each predicted the other in subsequent years. These relations could not be accounted for by children's broader cognitive skills. Implications for early STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) engagement and success are discussed.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sources of individual differences in early elementary school science achievement among multilingual and English monolingual children in the U.S. COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
3
|
Comparing Guidance via Implicit and Explicit Model Progressions in a Collaborative Inquiry-Based Learning Environment with Different-Aged Learners. EDUCATION SCIENCES 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/educsci12060393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
There is a need for research on the effect of different types of model progressions and learner age on learning and engagement in inquiry-based science settings. This study builds on the Scientific Discovery as Dual Search model to introduce less specific implicit model progression and compares them to the traditional explicit model progression. The data come from Finnish 8-, 10-, and 12-year-olds collaboratively using two different configurations of an inquiry-based learning environment about balance. Balance scale tasks were used to assess learning. Students also rated their situation-specific engagement. Both types of model progressions were beneficial for learning but there was no difference in the normalized change scores between them. The 12-year-olds had a higher normalized change score than the 8-year-olds. There were no differences in situation-specific engagement between the two types of model progression. These results suggest that implicit model progression offers a way to provide less specific guidance and a more open learning environment for primary-aged learners compared to the more specific explicit model progression.
Collapse
|
4
|
Moeller A, Sodian B, Sobel DM. Developmental Trajectories in Diagnostic Reasoning: Understanding Data Are Confounded Develops Independently of Choosing Informative Interventions to Resolve Confounded Data. Front Psychol 2022; 13:800226. [PMID: 35242079 PMCID: PMC8886032 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Two facets of diagnostic reasoning related to scientific thinking are recognizing the difference between confounded and unconfounded evidence and selecting appropriate interventions that could provide learners the evidence necessary to make an appropriate causal conclusion (i.e., the control-of-variables strategy). The present study investigates both these abilities in 3- to 6-year-old children (N = 57). We found both competence and developmental progress in the capacity to recognize that evidence is confounded. Similarly, children performed above chance in some tasks testing for the selection of a controlled test of a hypothesis. However, these capacities were unrelated, suggesting that preschoolers' nascent understanding of the control-of-variables strategy may not be driven by a metacognitive understanding that confounded evidence does not support a unique causal conclusion, and requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April Moeller
- Department of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Beate Sodian
- Department of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - David M. Sobel
- Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schlatter E, Molenaar I, Lazonder AW. Learning scientific reasoning: A latent transition analysis. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
6
|
Abstract
Scientific reasoning is an important skill that encompasses hypothesizing, experimenting, inferencing, evaluating data and drawing conclusions. Previous research found consistent inter- and intra-individual differences in children’s ability to perform these component skills, which are still largely unaccounted for. This study examined these differences and the role of three predictors: reading comprehension, numerical ability and problem-solving skills. A sample of 160 upper-primary schoolchildren completed a practical scientific reasoning task that gauged their command of the five component skills and did not require them to read. In addition, children took standardized tests of reading comprehension and numerical ability and completed the Tower of Hanoi task to measure their problem-solving skills. As expected, children differed substantially from one another. Generally, scores were highest for experimenting, lowest for evaluating data and drawing conclusions and intermediate for hypothesizing and inferencing. Reading comprehension was the only predictor that explained individual variation in scientific reasoning as a whole and in all component skills except hypothesizing. These results suggest that researchers and science teachers should take differences between children and across component skills into account. Moreover, even though reading comprehension is considered a robust predictor of scientific reasoning, it does not account for the variation in all component skills.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Over the past three decades, our understanding of science learning in early childhood has improved exponentially and today we have a strong empirically based understanding of science experiences for children aged three to six years. However, our understanding of science learning as it occurs for children from birth to three years, is limited. We do not know enough about how scientific thinking develops across the first years of life. Identifying what we do know about science experiences for our youngest learners within the birth to three period specifically, is critical. This paper reviews the literature, and for the first time includes children in the birth to three period. The results are contextualised through a broader review of early childhood science education for children aged from birth to six years. Findings illustrated that the empirical research on science concept formation in the early years, has focused primarily, on children aged three to six years. The tendency of research to examine the process of concept formation in the birth to three period is also highlighted. A lack of empirical understanding of science concept formation in children from birth to three is evident. The eminent need for research in science in infancy–toddlerhood is highlighted.
Collapse
|
8
|
Grenell A, Carlson SM. Individual differences in executive function and learning: The role of knowledge type and conflict with prior knowledge. J Exp Child Psychol 2021; 206:105079. [PMID: 33610883 DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Executive function (EF) predicts children's academic achievement; however, less is known about the relation between EF and the actual learning process. The current study examined how aspects of the material to be learned-the type of information and the amount of conflict between the content to be learned and children's prior knowledge-influence the relation between individual differences in EF and learning. Typically developing 4-year-olds (N = 61) completed a battery of EF tasks and several animal learning tasks that varied on the type of information being learned (factual vs. conceptual) and the amount of conflict with the learners' prior knowledge (no prior knowledge vs. no conflicting prior knowledge vs. conflicting prior knowledge). Individual differences in EF predicted children's overall learning, controlling for age, verbal IQ, and prior knowledge. Children's working memory and cognitive flexibility skills predicted their conceptual learning, whereas children's inhibitory control skills predicted their factual learning. In addition, individual differences in EF mattered more for children's learning of information that conflicted with their prior knowledge. These findings suggest that there may be differential relations between EF and learning depending on whether factual or conceptual information is being taught and the degree of conceptual change that is required. A better understanding of these different relations serves as an essential foundation for future research designed to create more effective academic interventions to optimize children's learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Grenell
- Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
| | - Stephanie M Carlson
- Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Peteranderl S, Edelsbrunner PA. The Predictive Value of Children's Understanding of Indeterminacy and Confounding for Later Mastery of the Control-of-Variables Strategy. Front Psychol 2020; 11:531565. [PMID: 33335493 PMCID: PMC7736087 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Prior research has identified age 9–11 as a critical period for the development of the control-of-variables strategy (CVS). We examine the stability of interindividual differences in children's CVS skills with regard to their precursor skills during this critical developmental period. To this end, we relate two precursor skills of CVS at age 9 to four skills constituting fully developed CVS more than 2 years later, controlling for children's more general cognitive development. Note that N = 170 second- to fourth-graders worked on multiple choice-assessments of their understanding of indeterminacy of evidence and of confounding. We find relations between these two precursor skills and children's CVS skills 2 years later at age 11 in planning, identifying, and interpreting controlled experiments, and in recognizing the inconclusiveness of confounded comparisons (understanding). In accordance with the perspective that both indeterminacy and confounding constitute critical, related yet distinct elements of CVS, both precursor skills contribute to the prediction of later CVS. Together, the two precursor skills can explain 39% of students' later CVS mastery. Overall, the understanding of indeterminacy is a stronger predictor of fully developed CVS than that of confounding. The understanding of confounding, however, is a better predictor of the more difficult CVS sub-skills of understanding the inconclusiveness of confounded comparisons, and of planning a correctly controlled experiment. Importantly, both precursor skills maintain interactive predictive strength when controlling for children's general cognitive abilities and reading comprehension, showing that the developmental dynamics of CVS and its precursor skills cannot be fully ascribed to general cognitive development. We discuss implications of these findings for theories about the development of CVS and broader scientific reasoning.
Collapse
|
10
|
Hardy I, Saalbach H, Leuchter M, Schalk L. Preschoolers' Induction of the Concept of Material Kind to Make Predictions: The Effects of Comparison and Linguistic Labels. Front Psychol 2020; 11:531503. [PMID: 33329169 PMCID: PMC7710544 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Analogical reasoning by comparison is considered a special case of inductive reasoning, which is fundamental to the scientific method. By reasoning analogically, learners can abstract the underlying commonalities of several entities, thereby ignoring single objects' superficial features. We tested whether different task environments designed to trigger analogical reasoning by comparison would support preschoolers' induction of the concept of material kind to predict and explain objects' floating or sinking as a central aspect of scientific reasoning. Specifically, in two experiments, we investigated whether the number of presented objects (one versus two standards), consisting of a specific material and the labeling of objects with the respective material name, would benefit preschoolers' material-based inferences. For each item set used in both experiments, we asked the children (N = 59 in Experiment 1, N = 99 in Experiment 2) to predict an object's floating or sinking by matching it to the standards and to verbally explain their selections. As expected, we found a significant effect for the number of standards in both experiments on the prediction task, suggesting that children successfully induced the relevance of material kind by comparison. However, labels did not increase the effect of the standards. In Experiment 2, we found that the children could transfer their conceptual knowledge on material kind but that transfer performance did not differ among the task environments. Our findings suggest that tasks inviting analogical reasoning by comparison with two standards are useful for promoting young children's scientific reasoning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilonca Hardy
- Institute of Early and Primary Education, Educational Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Henrik Saalbach
- Institute of Educational Sciences, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.,Leipzig Research Center for Early Childhood Development, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Miriam Leuchter
- Institute for Children and Youth Education, Educational Sciences, University of Koblenz and Landau, Landau, Germany
| | - Lennart Schalk
- Institute for Research on Instruction and Subject-Specific Didactics, PH Schwyz, Goldau, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Young children are adept at several types of scientific reasoning, yet older children and adults have difficulty mastering formal scientific ideas and practices. Why do “little scientists” often become scientifically illiterate adults? We address this question by examining the role of intuition in learning science, both as a body of knowledge and as a method of inquiry. Intuition supports children's understanding of everyday phenomena but conflicts with their ability to learn physical and biological concepts that defy firsthand observation, such as molecules, forces, genes, and germs. Likewise, intuition supports children's causal learning but provides little guidance on how to navigate higher-order constraints on scientific induction, such as the control of variables or the coordination of theory and data. We characterize the foundations of children's intuitive understanding of the natural world, as well as the conceptual scaffolds needed to bridge these intuitions with formal science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Shtulman
- Department of Psychology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, California 91104, USA
| | - Caren Walker
- Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schwichow M, Osterhaus C, Edelsbrunner PA. The relation between the control-of-variables strategy and content knowledge in physics in secondary school. CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
13
|
Lazonder AW, Janssen N, Gijlers H, Walraven A. Patterns of Development in Children’s Scientific Reasoning: Results from a Three-Year Longitudinal Study. JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2020.1814293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
14
|
Weber AM, Reuter T, Leuchter M. The Impact of a Construction Play on 5- to 6-Year-Old Children's Reasoning About Stability. Front Psychol 2020; 11:1737. [PMID: 32760333 PMCID: PMC7372995 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Theory Young children have an understanding of basic science concepts such as stability, yet their theoretical assumptions are often not concerned with stability. The literature on theory theory and theory-evidence coordination suggests that children construct intuitive theories about their environment which can be adjusted in the face of counterevidence that cannot be assimilated into the prior theory. With increasing age, children acquire a Center theory when balancing objects and try to balance every object at their middle, succeeding with symmetrical objects. Later, they acquire the basic science concept of stability through learning that the weight distribution of an object is of importance. Thus, they acquire a Mass theory and succeed in balancing asymmetrical objects as well. Fluid and crystallized intelligence might contribute to children’s acquisition of Mass theory. Moreover, their Mass theory might be supported by implementing a playful intervention including (a) material scaffolds and (b) verbal scaffolds. Aims We investigated which theories children have about stability and whether these theories can be adjusted to Mass theory by implementing a playful intervention. Method A total of 183 5- to 6-year-old children took part in the study with a pre-post-follow-up intervention design. Children’s Mass theory was assessed with an interview in which children explained constructions’ stabilities. The children received a playful intervention with two differing degrees of scaffolding (material scaffolds or material + verbal scaffolds) or no scaffolding. Results At first few children used a Mass theory to explain their reasoning. However, after being confronted with counterevidence for the asymmetrical constructions, children changed their explanation and applied a Mass theory. More children in the play group with the highest degree of scaffolding, i.e., material + verbal scaffolds, acquired a Mass theory compared to the other groups. Fluid as well as crystallized intelligence contributed to children’s acquisition of a Mass theory. Discussion Counterevidence can support children in their acquisition of a Mass theory. A playful intervention with scaffolding supports children even more.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke Maria Weber
- Institute for Children and Youth Education, Educational Sciences, University of Koblenz and Landau, Landau, Germany
| | - Timo Reuter
- Institute for Children and Youth Education, Educational Sciences, University of Koblenz and Landau, Landau, Germany
| | - Miriam Leuchter
- Institute for Children and Youth Education, Educational Sciences, University of Koblenz and Landau, Landau, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fridman R, Eden S, Spektor-Levy O. Nascent Inquiry, Metacognitive, and Self-Regulation Capabilities Among Preschoolers During Scientific Exploration. Front Psychol 2020; 11:1790. [PMID: 32849056 PMCID: PMC7396714 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There is common agreement that preschool-level science education affects children's curiosity, their positive approach toward science, and their desire to engage with the subject. Children's natural curiosity drives them to engage enthusiastically in all forms of exploration. Engaging in scientific exploration necessitates self-regulation capabilities and a wide repertoire of cognitive and metacognitive strategies. The purpose of this study was to examine to what extent preschoolers (aged 5-6 years) implement nascent inquiry skills, metacognitive awareness, and self-regulation capabilities during play-based scientific exploration tasks. An additional purpose was to investigate the relationships between these capabilities, a relationship not yet investigated in the context of play-based, scientific exploration among young children. The study consisted of 215 preschoolers, from 10 preschools. For this study, we developed two scientific exploration tasks - structured and open-ended. Our motivation was to examine whether preschoolers' capabilities will differ in the context of structured task which is aligned with the view that young children need guidance and explicit instructions compared to the context of open-ended, play-based task-allowing the children to apply and test their intuitive theories and skills. During performance participants were videotaped. Their verbal and non-verbal responses were analyzed by means of a coding scheme. The results of a micro-analysis of about 100 h of video showed that given the opportunity, even without setting explicit goals and instructions, children exhibit inquiry capabilities: they ask questions, plan, hypothesize, use tools, draw conclusions. Asking questions and planning were better manifested during the structured task. Children also manifested higher levels of attention, persistence, and autonomy during the structured task. However, significant higher scores of self-regulation indications were revealed in the context of the open-ended, play-based, exploration task. Moreover, results indicate significant correlations between the five measures of preschoolers' inquiry capabilities and measures of metacognitive strategic awareness and self-regulation. The results of the present study suggest the importance of combining various learning environments and experiences in early science education that encourage children to engage in structured exploration alongside play-based, open-ended, exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronit Fridman
- Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.,The School of Education, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Sigal Eden
- Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.,The School of Education, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schlatter E, Molenaar I, Lazonder AW. Individual Differences in Children's Development of Scientific Reasoning Through Inquiry-Based Instruction: Who Needs Additional Guidance? Front Psychol 2020; 11:904. [PMID: 32477220 PMCID: PMC7241249 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Scientific reasoning involves a person's ability to think and act in ways that help advance their understanding of the natural world. Young children are naturally inclined to engage in scientific reasoning and display an emerging competence in the component skills of, for example, hypothesizing, experimenting and evaluating evidence. Developmental psychology research has shown that same-age children often differ considerably in their proficiency to perform these skills. Part of this variation comes from individual differences in cognition; another part is due to the fact that the component skills of scientific reasoning emerge at a different age and mature at a different pace. Significantly less attention has been paid to children's capacity to improve in scientific reasoning through instruction and deliberate practice. Although elementary science lessons are generally effective to raise the skill level of a group of learners, not all children benefit equally from the instructional treatment they receive. Knowing what causes this differential effectiveness is important as it can inform the design of adaptive instruction and support. The present study therefore aimed to identify and explain how fifth-graders (N = 138) improve their scientific reasoning skills over the course of a 5-week inquiry-based physics unit. In line with our expectations, significant progress was observed in children's achievements on a written scientific reasoning test, which was administered prior to and after the lessons, as well as in their responses to the questions and assignments that appeared on the worksheets they filled out during each lesson. Children's reading comprehension and mathematical skillfulness explained a portion of the variance in children's pretest-posttest gain. As these overall results did not apply equally to all component skills of scientific reasoning, we recommend science teachers to adapt their lessons based on children's past performance in reading and math and their actual performance of each scientific reasoning skill. The orchestration and relative effectiveness of both adaptive science teaching approaches is an interesting topic for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Schlatter
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Inge Molenaar
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Ard W Lazonder
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Haber AS, Sobel DM, Weisberg DS. Fostering Children’s Reasoning about Disagreements through an Inquiry-based Curriculum. JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2019.1639713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
18
|
Aguilar D, Pifarre Turmo M. Promoting Social Creativity in Science Education With Digital Technology to Overcome Inequalities: A Scoping Review. Front Psychol 2019; 10:1474. [PMID: 31312154 PMCID: PMC6614193 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Enhancing creativity and developing technology skills in the classroom are the future of education and can turn out to be powerful tools to smooth out inequalities in class. This paper presents a systematic scoping review study of the literature focusing on cases of social creativity and digital technology embedded in science education. To this end, 23 empirical studies were selected from several databases—all in English and subjected to a blind peer-review process—to address the interconnectedness of key themes encapsulated in the following three research questions: (i) which digital technology roles support collaborative and creative processes in science education? (ii) which forms of technology and technological features support and organize the aforementioned creative processes? and (iii) what pedagogical principles guide the promotion of social creativity using technology in science education and involve all the students? Results show that technology can play different roles in promoting social creativity: (1) as a tutoring device that nurtures some key science creative processes; (2) as a tool that shapes students' creative thinking; and (3) as a medium that builds the supportive environment to perform collective creativity processes. In our project, these three roles were performed using a wide range of web 2.0 technologies (e.g., web-based environments, digital platforms, mobile technology) that both engaged all students in active and rich user experience for collective knowledge creation and equipped all learners with the necessary skills that would turn them into active, i.e., dynamic and resourceful, citizens in a swiftly changing world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Aguilar
- Faculty of Education, Psychology and Social Work, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| | - Manoli Pifarre Turmo
- Faculty of Education, Psychology and Social Work, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Busch JTA, Legare CH. Using data to solve problems: Children reason flexibly in response to different kinds of evidence. J Exp Child Psychol 2019; 183:172-188. [PMID: 30875548 PMCID: PMC10675997 DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Revised: 01/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
This study examined children's (5- to 9-year-olds, N = 363) abilities to use information seeking and explanation to solve problems using conclusive or inconclusive (i.e., consistent, inconsistent, or ambiguous) evidence. Results demonstrated that inconsistent and ambiguous evidence, not consistent evidence, motivate more requests for information than conclusive evidence. In addition, children's explanations were flexible in response to evidence; explanations based on transitive inference were more likely to be associated with an accurate conclusion than other explanation types. Children's requests for additional information in response to inconclusive evidence increased with age, as did their problem-solving accuracy. The data demonstrate that children's capacity to use information seeking and explanation develop in tandem as tools for problem solving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin T A Busch
- Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
| | - Cristine H Legare
- Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Koerber S, Osterhaus C. Individual Differences in Early Scientific Thinking: Assessment, Cognitive Influences, and Their Relevance for Science Learning. JOURNAL OF COGNITION AND DEVELOPMENT 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2019.1620232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
21
|
Schwichow M, Nehring A. Variablenkontrolle beim Experimentieren in Biologie, Chemie und Physik: Höhere Kompetenzausprägungen bei der Anwendung der Variablenkontrollstrategie durch höheres Fachwissen? Empirische Belege aus zwei Studien. Naturwissenschaften 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40573-018-0085-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
22
|
Talib CA, Rajan ST, Hakim NWA, Malik AMA, Siang KH, Ali M. Gender Difference as a Factor in Fostering Scientific Reasoning Skill Among Students. 2018 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING EDUCATION (ICEED) 2018. [DOI: 10.1109/iceed.2018.8626888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
|
23
|
Köksal-Tuncer Ö, Sodian B. The development of scientific reasoning: Hypothesis testing and argumentation from evidence in young children. COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
24
|
Variable control and conceptual change: A large-scale quantitative study in elementary school. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
25
|
Lee SC, Irving KE. Development of Two-Dimensional Classroom Discourse Analysis Tool (CDAT): scientific reasoning and dialog patterns in the secondary science classes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION 2018; 5:5. [PMID: 30631695 PMCID: PMC6310396 DOI: 10.1186/s40594-018-0100-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a science classroom, students do not simply learn scientific ways of doing, knowing, and reasoning unless they find ways of appropriating scientific discourse. In the Next Generation Science Standards, major forms of scientific discourse are emphasized as a main part of the Science and Engineering Practices. To enhance student engagement in scientific discourse, teachers need to help students differentiate scientific ways of talking from everyday ways of talking. Thus, science teachers should be able to be aware of the differences to provide opportunities for students to engage in scientific discourse. RESULTS In this study, the classroom discourse analysis tool (CDAT) was developed to help science teachers and educators identify the patterns of their classroom discourse with the lens of scientific reasoning. The CDAT suggests a new way of discourse pattern finding with the two-dimensional graphic organizer and the quantitative data produced by the coding. To pilot the CDAT analysis, 13 videos and transcripts of two middle and one high school teachers' physical science classes were viewed and analyzed. The results from CDAT coding show illustrative information that characterizes the classroom discourse patterns in relation to scientific reasoning and teachers' questioning and feedback. A coded CDAT table shows what reasoning components used in the classroom dialogs between the teacher and students. It also shows how students engaged in the dialogs with the variations of their answers by the teacher's question and feedback. CONCLUSION The results show the patterns of students' responses strongly depend on teacher's question or feedback. In addition, this analysis also generates various quantitative data that represent certain characteristics of the classroom discourse, i.e., length of dialog and the number of reasoning components used. The possible implications of CDAT analysis are to explore the relationships between teachers' discourse patterns and students' achievement along with changes in their reasoning skills. Student attitudinal outcomes such as motivations, interests, or self-efficacy could also be compared by the classroom discourse patterns revealed by CDAT. CDAT analysis itself can also be used in a teacher professional development as an intervention to help teachers see their classroom discourse patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karen E. Irving
- Wichita State University, Wichita, KS USA
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Montes J, van Dijk M, Puche R, van Geert P. Trajectories of scientific reasoning: A microgenetic study on children's inquiry functioning. J Pers Oriented Res 2017; 3:67-85. [PMID: 33569125 PMCID: PMC7869623 DOI: 10.17505/jpor.2017.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
From the literature, we know that young children engage in inquiry as an organized activity aimed either at confirming or refuting the relevance of certain ideas. The current study provides a characterization of changes in inquiry using a multiple case study of four 5-year old children. Three computer-based tasks were presented to the children as multivariable problem solving situations concerning moving objects. A description of the temporal unfolding of real-time action on a short-term time scale and long-term time scale of learning and development is provided. The results indicated that the development of inquiry did not follow linear growth but included advances and relapses, exploratory states and transitions. The data were compatible with the view that the child's thinking and acting form a complex dynamic system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marijn van Dijk
- Heymans Institute of Psychological Research, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9012 TS Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Paul van Geert
- Heymans Institute of Psychological Research, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9012 TS Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Piekny J, Thomsen T, Schuchardt K, Lessing N, Greve W, Mähler C. Kognitive Kompetenzen und kognitive Bewältigungsstrategien im Vor- und Grundschulalter. KINDHEIT UND ENTWICKLUNG 2017. [DOI: 10.1026/0942-5403/a000214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Das Ziel dieser Studie bestand darin, Erkenntnisse zu Bedingungen und Wechselwirkungen in der Entwicklung kognitiver Kompetenzen und Bewältigungsstrategien im Vor- und Grundschulalter zu gewinnen. Anhand eines längsschnittlichen Designs im Altersbereich von 5 bis10 Jahren wurde an einer Stichprobe von 198 Kindern untersucht, welche kognitiven Kompetenzen (Theory of Mind, Exekutive Funktionen, Intelligenz, Flexibles Hypothesenbilden) die Nutzungshäufigkeit von Bewältigungsstrategien (Akzeptanz, Positive Neubewertung, Relativieren, Positive Refokussierung) vorhersagen, und ob Wechselwirkungen zwischen dem Flexiblen Hypothesenbilden und Bewältigungsstrategien im Grundschulalter bestehen. Pfadanalysen zeigten, dass kognitiv ausgerichtete Bewältigungsstrategien in Beziehung zum Flexiblen Hypothesenbilden stehen, während affektiv ausgerichtete Strategien keinen Zusammenhang zum Flexiblen Hypothesenbilden aufwiesen. Die Ergebnisse werden in Bezug auf Interventions- und Präventionsmöglichkeiten diskutiert.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nora Lessing
- Institut für Psychologie der Universität Hildesheim
| | - Werner Greve
- Institut für Psychologie der Universität Hildesheim
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
van der Graaf J, Segers E, Verhoeven L. Scientific reasoning in kindergarten: Cognitive factors in experimentation and evidence evaluation. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
29
|
Tolmie AK, Ghazali Z, Morris S. Children's science learning: A core skills approach. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY 2016; 86:481-97. [PMID: 27199279 DOI: 10.1111/bjep.12119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2015] [Revised: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research has identified the core skills that predict success during primary school in reading and arithmetic, and this knowledge increasingly informs teaching. However, there has been no comparable work that pinpoints the core skills that underlie success in science. AIMS AND METHOD The present paper attempts to redress this by examining candidate skills and considering what is known about the way in which they emerge, how they relate to each other and to other abilities, how they change with age, and how their growth may vary between topic areas. RESULTS There is growing evidence that early-emerging tacit awareness of causal associations is initially separated from language-based causal knowledge, which is acquired in part from everyday conversation and shows inaccuracies not evident in tacit knowledge. Mapping of descriptive and explanatory language onto causal awareness appears therefore to be a key development, which promotes unified conceptual and procedural understanding. CONCLUSIONS This account suggests that the core components of initial science learning are (1) accurate observation, (2) the ability to extract and reason explicitly about causal connections, and (3) knowledge of mechanisms that explain these connections. Observational ability is educationally inaccessible until integrated with verbal description and explanation, for instance, via collaborative group work tasks that require explicit reasoning with respect to joint observations. Descriptive ability and explanatory ability are further promoted by managed exposure to scientific vocabulary and use of scientific language. Scientific reasoning and hypothesis testing are later acquisitions that depend on this integration of systems and improved executive control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew K Tolmie
- Department of Psychology and Human Development, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, UK
| | - Zayba Ghazali
- Moray House School of Education, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Suzanne Morris
- Department of Psychology and Human Development, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Koerber S, Osterhaus C, Sodian B. Testing primary-school children's understanding of the nature of science. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 2014; 33:57-72. [PMID: 25295692 DOI: 10.1111/bjdp.12067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2014] [Revised: 09/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Understanding the nature of science (NOS) is a critical aspect of scientific reasoning, yet few studies have investigated its developmental beginnings and initial structure. One contributing reason is the lack of an adequate instrument. Two studies assessed NOS understanding among third graders using a multiple-select (MS) paper-and-pencil test. Study 1 investigated the validity of the MS test by presenting the items to 68 third graders (9-year-olds) and subsequently interviewing them on their underlying NOS conception of the items. All items were significantly related between formats, indicating that the test was valid. Study 2 applied the same instrument to a larger sample of 243 third graders, and their performance was compared to a multiple-choice (MC) version of the test. Although the MC format inflated the guessing probability, there was a significant relation between the two formats. In summary, the MS format was a valid method revealing third graders' NOS understanding, thereby representing an economical test instrument. A latent class analysis identified three groups of children with expertise in qualitatively different aspects of NOS, suggesting that there is not a single common starting point for the development of NOS understanding; instead, multiple developmental pathways may exist.
Collapse
|
31
|
Koerber S, Mayer D, Osterhaus C, Schwippert K, Sodian B. The Development of Scientific Thinking in Elementary School: A Comprehensive Inventory. Child Dev 2014; 86:327-36. [DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|