Independent nurse medication provision: A mixed method study assessing impact on patients' experience, processes, and costs in sexual health clinics

Attitudes of the public and medical professionals toward nurse prescribing: A text-mining study based on social medias

Objectives

This study aimed to explore the public and medical professionals' concerns and attitudes toward nurse prescribing using text-mining method to analyze social media data.

Methods

Python was used to automatically mine data related to the keywords "nurse prescribing" and "prescription" that were posted on four Chinese internet platforms between January 1, 2017, and November 1, 2022. The four Chinese internet platforms included social media sites such as Zhihu and Weibo, as well as medical forums like Aiaiyi Medical Hotspot and Dingxiangyuan Medicine. We conducted personnel, topic, and sentiment analysis techniques using SnowNLP, Bayesian Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), and BosonNLP. Finally, we conducted content analysis using Nvivo 11 based on the results of the topic and sentiment analysis to obtain comprehensive and insightful results.

Results

We acquired 2,823 comments totaling 92,859 words on the four Internet platforms to conduct analysis. The analyze result showed that many public and medical professionals held a negative attitude toward nurse prescribing, and few had a prudent positive attitude. The public is concerned about the impact of nurse prescribing on medical professionals and the competency requirements for nurses. Medical professionals are concerned about the current and future status of nurse prescribing in China and the difficulties in implementing nurse prescribing.

Conclusion

Nurses should gradually gain recognition for their expertise and win the acceptance of the public and medical professionals on their ability of nursing prescribing by striving to enhance their professional capacity and self-authorization capabilities. Nurse administrators and educators need to recognize the advantages of nurse prescribing and address the challenges and issues in its implementation through promoting legislation, education, and heightening public awareness of its benefits.

Readmissions after appointments with nurse prescribers: A register-based study

BACKGROUND

Increasing number of nurse prescribers could be part of a solution to the shortage of physicians, improve access to treatment and curb the rise in healthcare costs; however, readmissions after nurse prescribers' appointments are under-researched.

AIMS

To describe and compare clients' initial appointments with nurse prescribers and physicians. In addition, client readmissions within 60 days in the target organisation after nurse prescribers' and physicians' appointments were investigated.

DESIGN

Retrospective register-based follow-up study.

METHODS

Data included client appointments (n = 3986) with nurse prescribers and physicians, and clients' readmissions (n = 9038) from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019 from one hospital district in Finland. Data were analysed statistically using frequencies, percentages, rate ratios and cross-tabulation. STROBE checklist was used.

RESULTS

Initial appointments including trimethoprim, pivmecillinam, phenoxymethyl penicillin, chloramphenicol, fusidic acid and cephalexin prescriptions with nurse prescribers (n = 36) were 2131, and physicians (n = 140) 1855. On average, client readmissions (within 60 days) per initial appointment were 2.10 after appointments with nurse prescribers and 2.46 after physicians. After initial appointments, including phenoxymethyl penicillin prescriptions, with nurse prescribers, clients had more readmissions in all age groups than after initial appointments with physicians. However, in all, after initial appointments with physicians, clients had a higher proportion of readmissions.

CONCLUSION

Clients have fewer readmissions after appointments with nurse prescribers than physicians, including the same prescriptions. Nurse prescribers' skills may not have been fully utilised. Physicians treated many patients whose diseases nurse prescribers might have been able to treat based on the nurse prescribers' rights. However, physician clients may have more demanding service requirements.

Experiences of Spanish nurses in the rollout of nurse prescribing: a qualitative study

Introduction

Nurse prescribing has legal recognition in Spain, after a long regulatory process, with confusing, changing legislation that does not fully coincide with the reality of nurses' practice. There is currently no research available on how nurses have experienced the rollout of nurse prescribing. The objective of this study is to describe the experiences of nurses in the rollout of nurse prescribing in the province of Barcelona, Spain.

Method

A descriptive qualitative study with intentional sampling was carried out between March 2021 and July 2022. The data were collected through semi-structured individual interviews and discussion groups. The participants were 24 nurses working in the province of Barcelona who were accredited in nurse prescribing or involved in the rollout of nurse prescribing. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis, following Braun and Clark. The COREQ checklist was used to report findings.

Results

We describe nurses' responses on the following themes: internal and external barriers; strategies to support nurse prescribing in the initial rollout and proposals for improvement; and factors linked to nurses' satisfaction.

Discussion

The regulatory process has provided a safety framework for nurse prescribing. Strategies are needed for its comprehensive development and its acceptance among the public. The findings give visibility to nurse prescribing internationally.

Costs, consequences and value for money in non-medical prescribing: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Non-medical prescribing (NMP) is a key feature of the UK healthcare system that refers to the legal prescribing rights granted to nurses, pharmacists and other non-medical healthcare professionals who have completed an approved training programme. NMP is deemed to facilitate better patient care and timely access to medicine. The aim of this scoping review is to identify, synthesise and report the evidence on the costs, consequences and value for money of NMP provided by non-medical healthcare professionals.

DESIGN

Scoping review DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed, ISI Web of Science and Google Scholar were systematically searched from 1999 to 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Peer-reviewed and grey literature written in English were included. The research was limited to original studies evaluating economic values only or both consequences and costs of NMP.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The identified studies were screened independently by two reviewers for final inclusion. The results were reported in tabular form and descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 420 records were identified. Of these, nine studies evaluating and comparing NMP with patient group discussions, general practitioner-led usual care or services provided by non-prescribing colleagues were included. All studies evaluated the costs and economic values of prescribing services by non-medical prescribers, and eight assessed patient, health or clinical outcomes. Three studies showed pharmacist prescribing was superior in all outcomes and cost saving at a large scale. Others reported similar results in most health and patient outcomes across other non-medical prescribers and control groups. NMP was deemed resource intensive for both providers and other groups of non-medical prescribers (eg, nurses, physiotherapists, podiatrists).

CONCLUSIONS

The review demonstrated the need for quality evidence from more rigorous methodological studies examining all relevant costs and consequences to show value for money in NMP and inform the commissioning of NMP for different groups of healthcare professionals.

Patient satisfaction with medication consultations and medicines information provided by nurses working autonomously in sexual health services: A questionnaire study

AIM

To compare the satisfaction of patients managed by independent nurse prescribers with that of patients managed by nurses using PGDs with respect to experience of the consultation and information received about the medication.

DESIGN

Survey.

METHODS

Patients receiving medications from nurses in five urban sexual health services in the United Kingdom completed validated questionnaires immediately after the consultation, September 2015-August 2016. Scores of independent nurse prescribers and nurses using patient group directions were compared about consultation experience (5 items) Satisfaction with Information about Medicines (SIMS 16 items scale).

RESULTS

Of 808 patients receiving medications, 393 (48.6%) received questionnaires and 380 were returned (independent nurse prescribers 180 of 198, 90.9%; patient group directions 173 of 195, 88.7%). Patients in both groups reported high levels of satisfaction. About the consultation experience, patients found nurses friendly/ approachable (>99%), instilling confidence and trust (>99%) and explaining reasons for medications clearly (97%). Satisfaction with medication information: Of 348 (92%) respondents completing SIMS, the overall mean score was 13.4 of maximum 16 (no difference between groups, t-test, p = .63).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients were highly satisfied with nurse consultations and information around medications regardless of whether they were managed by independent nurse prescribers or nurses using patient group directions.

IMPACT

Findings provide evidence in support of autonomous provision of medications by nurses in sexual health clinics.