Nurse-led interventions to manage hypertension in general practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The Effect of Nurse-Led Intervention on Limiting Health Costs of Cardiovascular Diseases in Chinese Adults

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), as the leading cause of mortality worldwide, impose substantial health-related costs. Lifestyle modification through education and counseling is a key strategy in CVD management. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a nurse-led intervention on CVDs-related health costs and lifestyle habits among Chinese adults with CVDs. A quasi-experimental study was conducted among adults with CVDs assigned to either an intervention or control group. The intervention consisted of bi-monthly sessions over a six-month period, conducted in a hospital setting by trained registered nurses. Outcomes included CVD-related health costs and lifestyle behaviors (smoking, alcohol use, physical activity, and diet), measured at baseline, post-intervention, and six-month follow-up. Data were analyzed using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to compare adjusted outcomes between groups, controlling for baseline values, age, gender, and BMI. The intervention group showed a higher proportion of non-smokers (from 65.2 to 74.1%) and participants with healthy diets (from 14.8 to 27.4%). At post-intervention, they had significantly fewer cigarettes smoked (9.6 ± 0.27, 95% CI: 9.07, 10.13 in intervention group vs. 11.1 ± 0.31, 95% CI: 10.49, 11.71 in control group; p = 0.024, η² = 0.020) and higher physical activity levels (264.4 ± 5.7, 95% CI: 253.23, 275.57 in intervention group vs. 229.2 ± 6.2, 95% CI: 217.05, 241.35 in control group; p = 0.032, η² = 0.018). At follow-up, they also showed significantly lower adjusted CVD-related health costs (17.2 ± 0.41, 95% CI: 16.4, 18.0 in intervention group vs. 20.7 ± 0.46, 95% CI: 19.8, 21.6 in control group; p = 0.029, η² = 0.018), sustained reductions in cigarette use (9.5 ± 0.26, 95% CI: 8.99, 10.01 in intervention group vs. 11.2 ± 0.32, 95% CI: 10.57, 11.83 in control group; p = 0.013, η² = 0.024), and increased physical activity (260.1 ± 5.4, 95% CI: 249.52, 270.68 in intervention group vs. 229.1 ± 6.4, 95% CI: 216.56, 241.64 in control group; p = 0.016, η² = 0.021). The nurse-led intervention may help promote lifestyle improvements and contribute to reductions in CVD-related health costs.

Impact of Routine Postoperative Care Versus Nurse-Led Lifestyle Interventions on Patient Outcomes After Radiofrequency Ablation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia associated with significant morbidity. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a widely used treatment, but postoperative complications and recurrence remain concerns. Nurse-led lifestyle interventions have been proposed as a strategy to improve patient outcomes after RFA.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the effects of routine (usual) care versus a nurse-led lifestyle intervention on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing RFA for paroxysmal AF.

METHODS

A total of 160 patients undergoing RFA for paroxysmal AF were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group or the usual-care group. The intervention group received tailored lifestyle interventions managed by a nurse-led multidisciplinary team, focusing on exercise, diet, medication adherence, and psychological support. The usual-care group received standard postoperative care. The primary outcomes were quality of life (Short Form-36 scores) and recurrence of AF. Data were collected at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.

RESULTS

The nurse-led lifestyle intervention group showed significant improvements in Short Form-36 scores for Physical Functioning, Role Limitations, Vitality, General Health, and Social Functioning compared with the usual-care group at 6 months (P < .05). The recurrence rate of AF at 12 months was significantly lower in the nurse-led lifestyle intervention group (12.5%) compared with the usual-care group (26.3%, P = .021). The incidence of postoperative complications was also reduced in the nurse-led lifestyle intervention group.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that nurse-led care models may provide a valuable approach to optimizing postoperative outcomes for AF patients, emphasizing the need for structured, personalized interventions in clinical practice.

What do Australian primary care clinicians need to provide long-acting reversible contraception and early medical abortion? A content analysis of a virtual community of practice

BACKGROUND

Uptake of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is lower in Australia compared with other high-income countries, and access to early medical abortion (EMA) is variable with only 11% of general practitioners (GPs) providing EMA. The AusCAPPS (Australian Contraception and Abortion Primary Care Practitioner Support) Network is a virtual community of practice established to support GPs, nurses and pharmacists to provide LARC and EMA in primary care. Evaluating participant engagement with AusCAPPS presents an opportunity to understand clinician needs in relation to LARC and EMA care.

METHODS

Data were collected from July 2021 until July 2023. Numbers of online resource views on AusCAPPS were analysed descriptively and text from participant posts underwent qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

In mid-2023 AusCAPPS had 1911 members: 1133 (59%) GPs, 439 (23%) pharmacists and 272 (14%) nurses. Concise point-of-care documents were the most frequently viewed resource type. Of the 655 posts, most were created by GPs (532, 81.2%), followed by nurses (88, 13.4%) then pharmacists (16, 2.4%). GPs most commonly posted about clinical issues (263, 49% of GP posts). Nurses posted most frequently about service implementation (24, 27% of nurse posts). Pharmacists posted most about health system and regulatory issues (7, 44% of pharmacist posts).

CONCLUSIONS

GPs, nurses and pharmacists each have professional needs for peer support and resources to initiate or continue LARC and EMA care, with GPs in particular seeking further clinical education and upskilling. Development of resources, training and implementation support may improve LARC and EMA provision in Australian primary care.

Nurse-Based Models for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention From Research to Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

The past 2 decades have witnessed a number of studies and reviews reporting on the development, implementation, and evaluation of nurse-based models of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, which are contributing to the growing evidence base of their effectiveness. Teams comprising healthcare professionals with expertise in nursing, dietetics, physical activity, and behavioral skills have shown high levels of success in preventive efforts, particularly in high-risk and vulnerable populations.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to highlight the research and successful models of nurse-based care in clinical practice including the main outcomes, challenges, and dissemination of these models. Highlights include the role of nurses in CVD prevention and the lessons learned from implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Used appropriately, collaborative, team-based, nurse-led models have the potential to effect positive change in both primary and secondary prevention of CVDs. Technology also has an increasingly important role to play. Considerations regarding the effectiveness of contemporary nurse-based models include their design features and content, and methods of implementation and dissemination, with the aim of organizing and delivering flexible CVD preventive healthcare, including training and administrative oversight, which is responsive to contemporary patient need, choice, and preferences.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The nurse's role in CVD prevention shows promise for enhancing both primary and secondary prevention of CVD worldwide. The research and dissemination of models shown to be effective in clinical practice will enhance the capability of individuals to ensure that appropriate methods are used to implement and extend these models in numerous settings from primary to tertiary care.

Preventing Community-Acquired Pressure Injury in Spinal Cord Injury: Simulation for Registered Nurses

PURPOSE

The study purpose was to develop and assess a simulation for registered nurses to apply knowledge, skills, and attitudes in conducting a focused assessment in the clinic setting to prevent community-acquired pressure injuries (CAPrIs) in individuals living with spinal cord injury (SCI).

METHODS

Development, psychometric assessment, and pilot of a simulation for a nurse-patient clinic appointment to prevent CAPrIs at home. Evaluations were conducted via focus group.

RESULTS

The simulation required one round with five experts in preventing CAPrIs in SCI to reach 80% agreement. The simulation with a standardized patient and companion checklist was piloted with ( n = 4) post-baccalaureate registered nurse residents. Evaluation results indicated participants grew in knowledge, skills, and attitudes in conducting a focused assessment on prevention of CAPrIs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Evidence-based nursing education is needed for CAPrI prevention for individuals living with SCI in the community setting. The simulation is replicable.

CONCLUSIONS

The online educational program, simulation, and checklist for nurses promoted knowledge, skills, and attitudes in assessment of CAPrI prevention.

Effectiveness of nurse-led self-care interventions on quality of life, social support, depression and anxiety among people living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

People living with HIV often face challenges related to quality of life, mental health, and social support. Nurse-led self-care interventions have been proposed as a means to address these issues, but their overall effectiveness needs systematic evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review and meta-analyze the effectiveness of nurse-led self-care interventions on quality of life, social support, depression, and anxiety among people living with HIV.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science (Core Collection), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and PsycINFO (Ovid) was conducted for articles from inception to May 2024. Two authors independently screened studies and extracted data. Randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of nurse-led self-care interventions on the quality of life, social support, depression, and anxiety in people living with HIV, published in English, were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata17, and the certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Nineteen randomized controlled trials published between 2003 and 2024 were included. The meta-analysis showed that compared to the control group, nurse-led self-care interventions significantly improved quality of life (SMD = 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.07 to 0.84, P < 0.05) and reduced depression (SMD = -0.46, 95 % CI: -0.75 to -0.17, P < 0.001; RR = 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.68 to 0.94, P < 0.05). The impact on social support was not statistically significant (SMD = -0.02, 95 % CI: -0.25 to 0.22, P = 0.89). Only two studies reported beneficial effects on anxiety, indicating a need for further high-quality research.

CONCLUSION

Nurse-led self-care interventions effectively improve the quality of life and reduce depression in people living with HIV, but current evidence shows these interventions have little impact on social support. The evidence regarding anxiety is limited, indicating a need for more rigorous research to explore the potential benefits of these interventions for anxiety in people living with HIV. These findings support the inclusion of nurse-led self-care interventions in routine HIV care to enhance the well-being of people living with HIV.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

(PROSPERO): CRD42024548592.

Assessing Associations of Nurse-Managed Hypertension Care on Pharmacotherapy, Lifestyle Counseling, and Prevalence of Comorbid Cardiometabolic Diseases in All Patients With Hypertension That Are Treated in Primary Care in Stockholm, Sweden

The aim was to study if nurse-managed hypertension care was associated with differences in pharmacotherapy, lifestyle counseling, and prevalence of comorbid cardiometabolic diseases among patients receiving care at primary health care centers. To assess the extent of nurses' involvement in the hypertension care, a questionnaire was distributed to all primary health care centers in Region Stockholm. Age-adjusted logistic regression models were used to analyze the results, odds ratios with 99% confidence intervals. Data was acquired from VAL, the administrative databases of Region Stockholm in Sweden, encompassing all individuals 30 years or older with a registered hypertension diagnosis who attended to the primary health care center they were registered at. Our analysis comprised 119 267 patients diagnosed with hypertension registered in one of the 224 included primary health care centers. Of the 81 primary health care centers that responded to the questionnaire, 54 reported having nurse-managed hypertension care. Nurse-managed hypertension care was not significantly associated with differences in pharmacotherapy or patients' comorbidity, except for diabetes. Primary health care centers with nurse-managed hypertension care had a 10% greater adherence to national guidelines for lifestyle counseling (33.5%) compared to those without nurse-managed hypertension care (22.5%). Regardless of the organizational form of hypertension care management, more men received lifestyle counseling according to guidelines compared to women. In-house routines for hypertension care, with designated nurses, and booking systems were associated with more lifestyle counseling, which has been associated with signs of better hypertension care.

The effect of consultations performed by specialised nurses or advanced nurse practitioners on patient and organisational outcomes in patients with complex health conditions: An umbrella review

BACKGROUND

Policymakers and researchers often suggest that nurses may play a crucial role in addressing the evolving needs of patients with complex conditions, by taking on advanced roles and providing nursing consultations. Nursing consultations vary widely across settings and countries, and their activities range from complementing to substituting traditional physician-led consultations or usual care.

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed at describing the effects of nursing consultations with patients with complex conditions in any setting on patient outcomes (quality of life, physical status, psychosocial health, health behaviour, medication adherence, mortality, anthropometric and physiological outcomes, and patient satisfaction) and organisational outcomes (health resource use and costs).

DESIGN

Umbrella review.

METHODS

We followed the Joanna Briggs Institute method for umbrella reviews. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CINAHL to identify relevant articles published in English, Dutch, French, Spanish or German between January 2013 and February 2023. We included systematic literature reviews, with or without meta-analyses, that included randomised controlled trials conducted in high-income countries. Reviews were eligible if they pertained to consultations led by specialised nurses or advanced nurse practitioners. Article selection, data extraction and quality appraisal were performed independently by at least two reviewers.

RESULTS

We included 50 systematic reviews based on 473 unique trials. For all patient outcomes, nursing consultations achieved effects at least equivalent to those of physician-led consultations or usual care (i.e., non-inferiority). For quality of life, health behaviour, medication adherence, mortality and patient satisfaction, more than half the meta-analyses found statistically significant effects in favour of nursing consultations (i.e., superiority). Cost results must be interpreted with caution, because very few and heterogeneous cost-related data were extracted, and the methodological quality of the cost analyses was questionable. Narrative syntheses confirmed the overall conclusions of the meta-analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of nursing consultations on patients with complex health conditions across healthcare settings appear to be at least similar to physician-led consultations or usual care. Nursing consultations appear to be more effective than physician-led consultations or usual care in terms of quality of life, health behaviour, mortality, patient satisfaction and medication adherence. Further analysis of the primary data is necessary to determine the patient populations and settings in which nursing consultations are most effective. Moderate study quality, diversity amongst and within systematic reviews, and quality of reporting hamper the strength of the findings.

Effects of nurse-led interventions on the physical and mental health among pre-frail or frail older adults: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Globally, there is an increase in the number of older people living with frailty, thus effective strategies to prevent and manage frailty are of paramount importance. The effects of nurse-led interventions on the physical and mental health of (pre) frail people have not yet been systematically reviewed.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 8 May 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental trials reporting the effects of nurse-led interventions on physical and mental health outcomes among (pre) frail people. Two researchers independently extracted trial data and assessed the risk of bias by using the risk of bias tool recommended by the Cochrane Back Review Group and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.

RESULTS

14 randomized controlled trials and 6 quasi-experimental studies, encompassing 3943 participants, were included in the review. Nurse-led interventions included function-based care (cognitive behavioral therapy, exercise, and multi-domain intervention), personalized integrated care, and advance care planning. The reported outcomes were multiple with most results showing inconsistencies. Overall, function-based care showed more positive effects on physical outcomes (31/37, 84 %) and mental health (11/12, 92 %). However, the effectiveness of existing personalized integrated care and advance care planning might be limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse-led interventions may effectively improve both physical and mental health among (pre) frail older adults, although effectiveness varies by intervention type. Nurses have the potential to play a leading role, both individually and within multidisciplinary teams, in alleviating the rising global burden of frailty. We need more well-designed randomized controlled trials to confirm the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions and identify the most effective type of interventions.

The Effectiveness of Collaborative Advanced Practice Nursing in Primary Hypertension Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a global health concern that is best managed at the primary care level. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) facing resource constraints, collaboration between well-prepared entry-level advanced practice nurses (APNs) and physicians (medical doctors [MDs]) can enhance the care of patients with primary hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of collaborative entry-level APNs in primary hypertension management, including patient knowledge, physiological and behavioral outcomes, consultation length, and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

Sixty-three eligible patients were randomly assigned to either an entry-level APN intervention group or a control group with MDs. Three master's-prepared nurses, trained in hypertension management, acted as entry-level APNs, following the Joint National Committee guidelines in collaboration with a physician. The control group underwent standard clinic consultations. After 1 month, a mixed analysis of variance was used to assess intervention effectiveness, examining both between-groups and within-groups outcomes.

RESULTS

Both groups shared similar sociodemographic and baseline characteristics. Significant improvements in blood pressure, body mass index, knowledge, self-management, and medication adherence were found at the 1-month follow-up, with no significant differences in outcomes or patient satisfaction between the entry-level APN and MD groups. However, clinical consultation time was significantly longer for entry-level APNs than for MDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Collaborative entry-level APNs managing primary hypertension are comparable with MD care; however, larger, longer trials are essential for a thorough assessment. Strengthening the development of entry-level advanced practice nursing roles in low- and middle-income countries is crucial for addressing service gaps in primary hypertension and other chronic diseases.

Nurse and midwife involvement in task-sharing and telehealth service delivery models in primary care: A scoping review

AIM

To synthesise and map current evidence on nurse and midwife involvement in task-sharing service delivery, including both face-to-face and telehealth models, in primary care.

DESIGN

This scoping review was informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Methodology for Scoping Reviews.

DATA SOURCE/REVIEW METHODS

Five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to 16 January 2024, and articles were screened for inclusion in Covidence by three authors. Findings were mapped according to the research questions and review outcomes such as characteristics of models, health and economic outcomes, and the feasibility and acceptability of nurse-led models.

RESULTS

One hundred peer-reviewed articles (as 99 studies) were deemed eligible for inclusion. Task-sharing models existed for a range of conditions, particularly diabetes and hypertension. Nurse-led models allowed nurses to work to the extent of their practice scope, were acceptable to patients and providers, and improved health outcomes. Models can be cost-effective, and increase system efficiencies with supportive training, clinical set-up and regulatory systems. Some limitations to telehealth models are described, including technological issues, time burden and concerns around accessibility for patients with lower technological literacy.

CONCLUSION

Nurse-led models can improve health, economic and service delivery outcomes in primary care and are acceptable to patients and providers. Appropriate training, funding and regulatory systems are essential for task-sharing models with nurses to be feasible and effective.

IMPACT

Nurse-led models are one strategy to improve health equity and access; however, there is a scarcity of literature on what these models look like and how they work in the primary care setting. Evidence suggests these models can also improve health outcomes, are perceived to be feasible and acceptable, and can be cost-effective. Increased utilisation of nurse-led models should be considered to address health system challenges and improve access to essential primary healthcare services globally.

REPORTING METHOD

This review is reported against the PRISMA-ScR criteria.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

The study protocol is published in BJGP Open (Moulton et al., 2022).

Lifestyle counseling in patients with hypertension in primary health care and its association with antihypertensive pharmacotherapy

The study aimed to investigate differences in hypertensive- and cardio-preventive pharmacotherapy depending on if patients with hypertension received lifestyle counseling or not, including the difference between men and women. Data from the Region Stockholm VAL database was used to identify all patients with a hypertension diagnosis and had visited a primary health care center within the past five years. Data included registered diagnoses, pharmacotherapy, and codes for lifestyle counseling. Logistic regression adjusted for age and comorbidity (diabetes, stroke, coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, gout, obesity, heart failure) was used, presenting results as odds ratios (OR) with 99% confidence interval (CI). The study included 130,030 patients with hypertension; 63,402 men and 66,628 women. Patients receiving recommended lifestyle counseling were more frequently treated with three or more hypertensive drugs: women OR 1.38 (1.31, 1.45) and men = 1.36 (1.30, 1.43); certain drug classes: calcium antagonists: women 1.09 (1.04, 1.14) and men 1.11 (1.06, 1.16); thiazide diuretics: women 1.26 (1.20, 1.34) and men 1.25 (1.19, 1.32); and aldosterone antagonists: women 1.25 (1.12, 1.41) and men 1.49 (1.34, 1.65). Patients receiving recommended level of lifestyle counseling with concomitant coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, or stroke were more frequently treated with statins than those who did not. Further, recommended lifestyle counseling was significantly associated with anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation. Lifestyle counseling according to recommendations in national guidelines was significantly associated with a more thorough pharmacological treatment of hypertension, statins, and antithrombotic drugs as well as anticoagulants, in both men and women.

Applying the RE-AIM framework to evaluate an educational model to "close the gap" and improve health equity in uncontrolled hypertension

OBJECTIVES

To use the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate an educational model addressing self-management of uncontrolled hypertension.

METHODS

We used a pre-post single cohort design to identify minoritized patients with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic > 160 mmHg and/or diastolic > 100 mmHg). Trained Ambassadors provided telephone outreach, skill-based blood pressure (BP) monitoring, and goal-setting for 4 months. Follow-up occurred at 7 months. We evaluated the initiative using the RE-AIM framework and quantitative analysis for process and outcome measures post-intervention.

RESULTS

Among Black patients (n = 345), the average age was 55.4 years (8.7), half identified as male (n = 173, 50.1 %); many were uninsured (n = 159, 46.1 %). Engagement in calls occurred for 67.8 % (n = 234) of the cohort; monitor distribution was 22.9 % (n = 79); and goal setting occurred for 64 patients. BP improved for 40 % of the cohort (mean pre: 168/98 mmHg, mean post: 150/89 mmHg; p < 0.0001) and 40 % of patients' last known BP was < 140/90.

CONCLUSIONS

RE-AIM evaluation of the Closing the Gap initiative suggests that the model is associated with BP reduction in high-risk Black patients.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

An educational model for patient-centered hypertension management in low-income populations is feasible and addresses self-monitoring barriers.

Effectiveness of nurse-led interventions versus usual care to manage hypertension and lifestyle behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

This review aimed to investigate the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions vs. usual care on hypertension management, lifestyle behaviour, and patients' knowledge of hypertension and associated risk factors.

METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. MEDLINE (Ovid), EmCare (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane library, and ProQuest (Ovid) were searched from inception to 15 February 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of nurse-led interventions on hypertension management were identified. Title and abstract, full text screening, assessment of methodological quality, and data extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers using JBI tools. A statistical meta-analysis was conducted using STATA version 17.0.

RESULTS

A total of 37 RCTs and 9731 participants were included. The overall pooled data demonstrated that nurse-led interventions may reduce systolic blood pressure (mean difference -4.66; 95% CI -6.69, -2.64; I2 = 83.32; 31 RCTs; low certainty evidence) and diastolic blood pressure (mean difference -1.91; 95% CI -3.06, -0.76; I2 = 79.35; 29 RCTs; low certainty evidence) compared with usual care. The duration of interventions contributed to the magnitude of blood pressure reduction. Nurse-led interventions had a positive impact on lifestyle behaviour and effectively modified diet and physical activity, but the effect on smoking and alcohol consumption was inconsistent.

CONCLUSION

This review revealed the beneficial effects of nurse-led interventions in hypertension management compared with usual care. Integration of nurse-led interventions in routine hypertension treatment and prevention services could play an important role in alleviating the rising global burden of hypertension.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42021274900.

Association Between the Composite Cardiovascular Risk and mHealth Use Among Adults in the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey: Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have suggested that the relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and the usage of mobile health (mHealth) technology may vary depending on the total number of CVD risk factors present. However, whether higher CVD risk is associated with a greater likelihood of engaging in specific mHealth use among US adults is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to assess the associations between the composite CVD risk and each component of mHealth use among US adults regardless of whether they have a history of CVD or not.

METHODS

This study used cross-sectional data from the 2017 to 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey. The exposure was CVD risk (diabetes, hypertension, smoking, physical inactivity, and overweight or obesity). We defined low, moderate, and high CVD risk as having 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 CVD risk factors, respectively. The outcome variables of interest were each component of mHealth use, including using mHealth to make health decisions, track health progress, share health information, and discuss health decisions with health providers. We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between CVD risk and mHealth use adjusted for demographic factors.

RESULTS

We included 10,531 adults, with a mean age of 54 (SD 16.2) years. Among the included participants, 50.2% were men, 65.4% were non-Hispanic White, 41.9% used mHealth to make health decisions, 50.8% used mHealth to track health progress toward a health-related goal, 18.3% used mHealth to share health information with health providers, and 37.7% used mHealth to discuss health decisions with health providers (all are weighted percentages). Adults with moderate CVD risk were more likely to use mHealth to share health information with health providers (adjusted odds ratio 1.49, 95% CI 1.24-1.80) and discuss health decisions with health providers (1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.44) compared to those with low CVD risk. Similarly, having high CVD risk was associated with higher odds of using mHealth to share health information with health providers (2.61, 95% CI 1.93-3.54) and discuss health decisions with health providers (1.56, 95% CI 1.17-2.10) compared to those with low CVD risk. Upon stratifying by age and gender, we observed age and gender disparities in the relationship between CVD risk and the usage of mHealth to discuss health decisions with health providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with a greater number of CVD risk factors were more likely to use mHealth to share health information with health providers and discuss health decisions with health providers. These findings suggest a promising avenue for enhancing health care communication and advancing both primary and secondary prevention efforts related to managing CVD risk factors through the effective usage of mHealth technology.

The effect of nurse-led digital health interventions on blood pressure control for people with hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Nurse-led digital health interventions (DHIs) for people with chronic disease are increasing. However, the effect of nurse-led DHIs on blood pressure control and hypertension self-management remains unclear. This study aimed to identify the characteristics of nurse-led DHIs for people with hypertension and compared the effect size of nurse-led DHIs with that of usual care to establish evidence for the development of effective nursing interventions using technologies.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews of Intervention (PRISMA) guidelines and registered the protocol in PROSPERO. Studies published from 2000 to August 5, 2021, were searched using the international databases: PubMed; Embase; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; Web of Science; CINAHL; Korean databases: RISS, KISS, KMBASE; and NDSL. Risk of bias 2.0 was used for evaluating the quality of studies. The primary outcome was blood pressure control. The secondary outcomes were self-management, medication adherence, and diet adherence. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot and Egger's regression tests.

FINDINGS

The systematic review included 26 studies. A meta-analysis of 21 studies was conducted to calculate the effect size and identify heterogeneity among the included studies. In our meta-analysis, we observed that nurse-led DHIs reduced systolic blood pressure by 6.49 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.52 to -4.46, I2  = 75.4%, p < 0.05) and diastolic blood pressure by 3.30 mmHg (95% CI: -4.58 to -2.01, I2  = 70.3%, p < 0.05) when compared with usual care. Concerning secondary outcomes, the effect size on self-management, medication adherence, and diet adherence was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.58 to 1.37, I2  = 63.2%, p < 0.05), 1.05 (95% CI: 0.41 to 1.69, I2  = 92.5%, p < 0.05), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.17 to 1.42, I2  = 80.5%, p < 0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Nurse-led DHIs were more effective in reducing blood pressure and enhancing self-management than usual care among people with hypertension. Therefore, as new technologies are being rapidly developed and applied in healthcare systems, further studies and policy support are needed to utilize the latest digital innovations with nursing interventions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study could be used to identify that nurse-led interventions may take advantage of real-time communication by employing digital technologies for improving blood control and self-management behaviors such as medication adherence and diet adherence. Using nurse-led DHIs allows nurses to provide patient-centered interventions such as reflecting on patients' needs and shared decision-making without space constraints and limited treatment time.

Effectiveness of educational interventions on hypertensive patients' self-management behaviours: an umbrella review protocol

BACKGROUND

Although different educational interventions have been widely used to manage and treat hypertension, alone or in combination with other interventions, there is a significant variation in their claimed effectiveness.

REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE

The objective of this umbrella review is to determine the effectiveness of educational interventions, alone or in combination with other interventions, for improving blood pressure control and self-management practices among hypertensive patients. The review question is: Do educational interventions, alone or in combination with other interventions, improve self-management practices among patients with hypertension?

METHODS

We will conduct a review of systematic reviews involving studies that implemented educational interventions, alone or in combination with other interventions, designed to change self-care practices among hypertensive patients who are 18 years and above, regardless of their sex and ethnicity. Following the guidelines set forth in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement, a comprehensive literature search will be conducted from September to December 2023 on six electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar. Search terms will be developed using database-specific indexed terms and text words derived from the review aim. We will present the effects of the educational interventions, alone or in combination with other interventions, on hypertension self-management practices. We will report the outcome data with 95% CIs for each study. Relative risk, mean differences or ORs will be used, depending on the measuring indices in each study.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required as this study will use aggregated data from previously published systematic reviews. However, we have registered the protocol in PROSPERO. We confirm that all methods will be performed following the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. The findings from this study will be disseminated through presentations at academic conferences and publication in peer-reviewed international journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022375581.

The Cost of Uncontrolled Blood Pressure in Australian General Practice: A Modelling Study Using Electronic Health Records (MedicineInsight)

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is the most common condition seen in Australian general practice. Despite hypertension being amenable to lifestyle modifications and pharmacological treatment, only around half of these patients have controlled blood pressure levels (< 140/90 mmHg), placing them at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to estimate the health and acute hospitalisation costs of uncontrolled hypertension among patients attending general practice.

METHODS

We used population data and electronic health records from 634,000 patients aged 45-74 years who regularly attended an Australian general practice between 2016 and 2018 (MedicineInsight database). An existing worksheet-based costing model was adapted to calculate the potential cost savings for acute hospitalisation of primary cardiovascular disease events by reducing the risk of a cardiovascular event over the next 5 years through improved systolic blood pressure control. The model estimated the number of expected cardiovascular disease events and associated acute hospital costs under current levels of systolic blood pressure and compared this estimate with the expected number of cardiovascular disease events and costs under different levels of systolic blood pressure control.

RESULTS

The model estimated that across all Australians aged 45-74 years who visit their general practitioner (n = 8.67 million), 261,858 cardiovascular disease events can be expected over the next 5 years at current systolic blood pressure levels (mean 137.8 mmHg, standard deviation = 12.3 mmHg), with a cost of AUD$1813 million (in 2019-20). By reducing the systolic blood pressure of all patients with a systolic blood pressure greater than 139 mmHg to 139 mmHg, 25,845 cardiovascular disease events could be avoided with an associated reduction in acute hospital costs of AUD$179 million. If systolic blood pressure is lowered further to 129 mmHg for all those with systolic blood pressure greater than 129 mmHg, 56,169 cardiovascular disease events could be avoided with potential cost savings of AUD$389 million. Sensitivity analyses indicate that potential cost savings range from AUD$46 million to AUD$1406 million and AUD$117 million to AUD$2009 million for the two scenarios, respectively. Cost savings by practice range from AUD$16,479 for small practices to AUD$82,493 for large practices.

CONCLUSIONS

The aggregate cost effects of poor blood pressure control in primary care are high, but cost implications at the individual practice level are modest. The potential cost savings improve the potential to design cost-effective interventions, but such interventions may be best targeted at a population level rather than at individual practices.

Cardiovascular risk reduction with integrated care: results of 8 years follow up

BACKGROUND

Care groups organize integrated cardiovascular risk management programs in primary care for high risk patients. Results of long term cardiovascular risk management are scarce. The aim was to describe changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure and smoking between 2011 and 2018 in patients participating in an integrated program for cardiovascular risk management organized by a care group in the Netherlands.

AIM

To explore whether long-term participation in an integrated cardiovascular risk management program could lead to the improvement of 3 important risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

A protocol was developed for delegated practice nurse activities. A multidisciplinary data registry was used for uniform registration. The care group organized annual education for general practitioners and practice nurses on cardiovascular topics and regular meetings for practice nurses only to discuss complex patient cases and implementation issues. From 2015 onwards, the care group started with practice visitations to discuss performance and support practices with organizing integrated care.

RESULTS

In patients eligible for primary prevention as well as for secondary prevention similar trends were observed: lipid modifying and blood pressure lowering medication increased, mean low density lipoprotein cholesterol and mean systolic blood pressure decreased, patients on target for low density lipoprotein cholesterol and systolic blood pressure increased and the proportion of non-smokers with both low density lipoprotein cholesterol and systolic blood pressure on target increased. Improved registration between 2011 and 2013 was partly responsible for the sharp increase of patients on target for low density lipoprotein cholesterol and systolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

In patients participating in an integrated cardiovascular risk management program, we saw annual improvements in 3 important cardiovascular risk factors between 2011 and 2018.

Understanding how general practice nurses support adult lifestyle risk reduction: An integrative review

AIM

To review the literature exploring how general practice nurses support lifestyle risk reduction.

DESIGN

Integrative literature review.

SOURCES

CINAHL, Emcare, MEDLINE, Proquest and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed primary research published in English from 2010 to 2022.

METHODS

Sixteen papers met the inclusion criteria and were assessed for methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were extracted and thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Four themes described general practice nurses: (1) Establishing relational connections; (2) Empowering active participation; (3) Engaging mutual motivation and (4) Enabling confident action. General practice nurses used complex interpersonal, risk communication and health coaching skills to build collaborative partnerships that supported patients' self-determination and self-efficacy. While mutual motivation and confidence were reciprocally enabling, gaps in skills, experience and knowledge plus time, resource and role constraints limited general practice nurses' ability to support lifestyle risk reduction.

CONCLUSION

General practice nurses play a key role in lifestyle risk reduction. Ongoing education, funding, organizational and professional support are needed to enhance their commitment, confidence and capacity.

IMPACT

What problem did the study address? While general practice nurses play a key role in health promotion and risk reduction, their potential is yet to be fully realized. Research examining methods by which nurses working in general practice support lifestyle risk reduction is limited. What were the main findings? Successful interactions depended on personal, professional, organisational and systemic factors which either enhanced or inhibited relational quality, shared decision-making, mutual commitment, and nurses' confidence and capacity to address lifestyle risks. Targeted professional development and peer mentoring are needed to build proficient practice. Where and on whom will the research have impact? Understanding how general practice nurses support risk reduction can inform policy and identify training and support needs to advance their skills and role. Research exploring synergies between themes may illuminate this process.