Relationship between contact force sensing technology and medium-term outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation: a multicenter study of 600 patients

Adding interactive face-to-face lectures to passive lectures effectively reduces radiation exposure during atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Radiation exposure remains a major concern for electrophysiologists and patients. This study aimed to investigate the effect of altering awareness of radiation exposure during atrial fibrillation ablation using interactive face-to-face (FTF) lectures compared to passive lectures.

METHODS

Patients who underwent their first catheter ablation with radiofrequency energy for atrial fibrillation between January 2014 and December 2020 were included in this study. All operators attended an e-learning lecture on radiation exposure before catheter ablation. The addition of FTF lectures to this lecture was introduced in 2018. The effect on radiation exposure was compared between the pre-FTF and FTF periods by comparing fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.

RESULTS

A total of 896 patients [mean age, 66 ± 11 years; 603 men (67 %)] were included in this study. For pre-FTF (n = 345), only pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 112 patients and PVI with additional ablation in 233 patients. For FTF lectures (n = 551), PVI-only was performed in 302 patients and PVI with additional ablation in 249 patients. Fluoroscopy time, cumulative air kerma, and cumulative air kerma per time significantly reduced after FTF introduction in both PVI-only group [pre-FTF and FTF; 37 ± 15 min and 16 ± 10 min (p < 0.0001), 477 ± 582 mGy and 108 ± 156 mGy (p < 0.0001), 11 ± 12 mGy/min, and 5 ± 6 mGy/min (p < 0.0001), respectively] and PVI with additional ablation group [pre-FTF and FTF; 48 ± 17 min and 15 ± 13 min (p < 0.0001), 613 ± 483 mGy and 68 ± 96 mGy (p < 0.0001), 12 ± 10 mGy/min, and 4 ± 4 mGy/min (p < 0.0001), respectively]. There were no significant differences in intraoperative complications between the two periods.

CONCLUSIONS

FTF lectures can reduce radiation exposure.

Improvement in Lesion Formation with Radiofrequency Energy and Utilization of Alternate Energy Sources (Cryoablation and Pulsed Field Ablation) for Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation

Current ablation systems rely on thermal energy to produce ablation lesions (heating: RF, laser and ultrasound, and cooling: cryo-thermia). While thermal ablation has been proven to be effective, there are several limitations: 1) relatively long procedural times; 2) high recurrence rate of ventricular arrhythmias; and 3) excessive heating potentially leading to serious complications, including steam pop (perforation), coronary arterial injury and thrombo-embolism. Pulsed field ablation (PFA)/irreversible electroporation (IRE) offers a unique non-thermal ablation strategy which has the potential to overcome these limitations. Recent pre-clinical studies suggest that PFA/IRE might be effective and safe for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias.

Comparison of the Different Anesthesia Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Catheter ablation has become a widely applied intervention for treating symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), which can be performed under general anesthesia (GA), deep sedation, or conscious sedation (CS). But the strategy of anesthesia remains controversial.

Objectives

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the advantages of GA/deep sedation and CS in AF catheter ablation, including procedural parameters and clinical outcomes.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to November 2021 for randomized controlled trials and observational studies that assessed the outcomes of catheter ablation under GA/deep sedation or CS. Ten studies were included in this meta-analysis after screening with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated by the I² index and the Cochran Q test, respectively; sensitivity analysis including meta-regression was performed if heterogeneity was high. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger' test.

Results

This meta-analysis found GA/deep sedation to be associated with a lower recurrence rate of AF catheter ablation (p=0.03). In terms of procedural parameters, there was no significant difference between the two groups for the procedural time (p=0.35) and the fluoroscopy time (p=0.60), while the ablation time was shorter in the GA/deep sedation group (p=0.008). The total complication rate and the incidence of serious adverse events were statistically insignificant between the two groups (p=0.07 and p=0.94). Meta-regression did not suggest any covariates as an influential factor for procedural parameters and clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

GA/deep sedation may reduce the risk of recurrence after AF ablation without increasing the incidence of complications. GA/deep sedation shortens the ablation duration, although there is no statistical difference in other procedural parameters between GA/deep sedation and CS.

Impact of open-irrigated radiofrequency catheter with contact force measurement on the efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation: a single-center direct comparison

BACKGROUND

In atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, catheter ablation of pulmonary veins (PVI) is the most effective therapeutic option to maintain sinus rhythm. To improve successful PVI, contact force-sensing (CF) catheters became routinely available. Previous studies did not clearly show superior clinical efficacy in comparison with non-CF catheters.

METHODS

We investigated consecutive patients, who underwent index PVI for AF at our hospital between 2012 and 2018. Three hundred and fifty-four patients were ablated without CF. After availability of CF catheters in 2016, 317 patients were ablated using CF. In case of crossover between the groups, follow-up was censored. The primary endpoint was any documented atrial tachycardia (AT) or atrial fibrillation > 30 s after a 3-month blanking period. Secondary endpoints were procedural characteristics and periprocedural complications.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the groups at baseline except hyperlipidemia. After 365 days of follow-up, 67% of patients in the CF group remained free from AF/AT recurrence compared to 59% in non-CF group (P = 0.038). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, non-CF ablation was an independent risk factor for AF recurrence besides age and persistent AF. Total fluoroscopy time (15 ± 7.6 vs. 28 ± 15.9 min) and total procedure time (114 ± 29.6 vs. 136 ± 38.5 min) were significantly lower for CF-guided PVI (P < 0.001). Complication rates did not differ between groups (P = 0.661).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the AT/AF recurrence rate and pulmonary vein reconnection rate is lower after CF PVI with a similar complication rate but lower total procedure time and total fluoroscopy time compared to non-CF PVI.

Contact force ablation of accessory pathways in pediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Contact force (CF) catheters provide feedback confirming adequate tissue contact for optimal lesion size and minimal complications. CF ablation catheters have resulted in decreased procedure times and improved outcomes for ablation of atrial fibrillation in adults. There is limited data evaluating CF use for accessory pathway (AP) ablation or in pediatric patients. The aim of our study was to compare a cohort who underwent AP ablation with a CF catheter to historical controls, evaluating for differences in procedure times, number of lesions, and outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of CF ablation cases at Children's Wisconsin performed between June 2015 to April 2018 was compared to a historical control cohort of traditional radiofrequency (RF) ablations between June 2012 and June 2015. 43 patients with APs underwent 49 CF ablation procedures (18 males, 13.6 ± 3 years old) and a control cohort consisted of 77 procedures in 69 patients (38 males, 12.4 ± 4 years).

RESULTS

The groups did not differ significantly on procedure time (CF 2.01 ± 0.48 h, control 1.53 ± 0.48 h, p = .37), or total lesions administered (CF and control 7 ± 6 lesions, p = .89). CF cases showed a trend toward improvement in acute success (98% CF, 90% controls, p = .15) though with increased recurrence compared to controls (13% CF, 4.3% controls, p = .16), neither being statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that ablation outcomes using CF are comparable to traditional RF ablation in pediatric patients with APs.

Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of contact force sensing on the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation: discrepancy between observational studies and randomized control trial data

Aims

Despite widespread adoption of contact force (CF) sensing technology in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, randomized data suggests lack of improvement in clinical outcomes. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of CF-guided vs. non CF-guided AF ablation.

Methods and results

Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies (OS) comparing outcomes of AF ablation performed with vs. without CF guidance. The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from AF at follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was major peri-procedural complications. Secondary endpoints included procedural, fluoroscopy, and ablation duration. Subgroup analyses were performed by AF type and study design. Nine RCTs (n = 903) and 26 OS (n = 8919) were included. Overall, CF guidance was associated with improved freedom from AF [relative risk (RR) 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.18], and reduced total procedure duration [mean difference (MD) 15.33 min; 95% CI 6.98-23.68], ablation duration (MD 3.07 min; 95% CI 0.29-5.84), and fluoroscopy duration (MD 5.72 min; 95% CI 2.51-8.92). When restricted to RCTs however, CF guidance neither improved freedom from AF (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.95-1.11), independent of AF type, nor did it reduce procedural, fluoroscopy, or ablation duration. Contact force guidance did not reduce the incidence of major peri-procedural complications (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.64-1.24).

Conclusion

Meta-analysis of randomized data demonstrated that CF guidance does not improve the safety or efficacy of AF ablation, despite initial observational data showing dramatic improvement. Rigorous evaluation in randomized trials is needed before widespread adoption of new technologies.

Re-definition of blanking period in radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the contact force era

INTRODUCTION

Early recurrence (ER) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is defined as the recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias within 3 months after AF ablation, however, this definition is based on data from the era of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), without contact force (CF) technology. We investigated the significance of ER as a risk factor for late recurrence (LR) in paroxysmal AF (PAF) patients treated with CF and non-CF-guided ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 395 patients with PAF who underwent RFCA. Of these, 97 patients underwent RFCA without-CF technology (non-CF group) and 298 underwent with CF technology (CF group). Over a 2-year postablation follow-up period, LR occurred in 54 (55.7%) patients in the non-CF group, and in 105 (35.2%) patients in the CF group. ER had a more significant relationship with LR in the CF group, and all patients in the CF group with ER in the third month developed LR.

CONCLUSION

PAF patients with ER who have undergone CF-guided ablation have a greater risk of LR than those who have undergone non-CF-guided ablation. ER in the third month after CF-guided ablation may indicate an absolute risk of LR. Blanking period could be defined as 2 months in the CF era.

Electrophysiological Procedures in Patients With Coagulation Disorders - A Systemic Review

Catheter ablation (CA) is considered first-line treatment for many patients with symptomatic arrhythmias. Indications for CA are constantly increasing, as is the number of procedures. Although CA is nowadays regarded a safe procedure, there is a risk of complications, including both bleeding- and thrombosis-related events. Several factors contribute to periprocedural risk; of these, patient coagulation status is of considerable clinical relevance. In this context, even a simple procedure poses a considerable challenge in a patient with coagulation disorder. However, the level of evidence regarding CA in patients with coagulation disorders is very low. Neither experts' recommendations nor clinical guidelines have been presented so far. The aim of this article is to analyze potential procedure-related risks and provide clinicians with useful information and practical suggestions regarding optimization of procedural safety in patients with coagulation disorders.

Contact-Force-Sensing-Based Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardias (COBRA-PATH): a randomized controlled trial

Background

Multiple studies have demonstrated the importance of adequate catheter–tissue contact in the creation of effective lesions during radiofrequency catheter ablation. The development of contact force (CF)-sensing catheters has contributed significantly to improve clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation. However, CF-sensing technology is not used in the ablation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). The possible reason for this is that PSVT ablation with the conventional approach (i.e. nonirrigated, non-CF-sensing catheters) is considered a relatively low-risk procedure with fairly high success rates (short and long term). The aim of this study is to determine whether CF sensing can further improve the outcomes of PSVT ablation.

Methods/design

The COBRA-PATH study is a single-center, two-armed, randomized controlled trial. Patients without structural heart disease being referred for electrophysiology study, because of PSVT and potential treatment with radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation, will be randomly assigned to either manual ablation with standard nonirrigated ablation catheters or manual ablation with an open-irrigated ablation catheter equipped with CF sensing (used in a virtual nonirrigated modus). The primary study endpoint is the difference in the number of RF applications during the ablation of atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia, and that of Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome and atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia. Secondary outcome parameters include acute and long-term procedural success rates, overall duration of RF applications, procedure/fluoroscopy durations and safety parameters.

Discussion

We expect to see a reduced number/duration of RF applications required to achieve effective lesion creation, and consequently a decrease in total procedure/fluoroscopy times. Although a significant improvement in procedural success rates (acute/long term) might not be feasible to demonstrate (given the relatively high success rate of the standard ablation method), the possible decrease in procedure duration and the consequential reduction of radiation exposure has important clinical implications for both operators and patients undergoing the procedure.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials, NCT04078685. Retrospectively registered on 2 September 2019.

Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The objective of our review was to systematically assess available evidence on the effectiveness, safety and efficiency of a spring sensor-irrigated contact force (CF) catheter (THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH Catheter (ST)) for percutaneous ablation of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), compared with other ablation catheters, or with the ST with the operator blinded to CF data.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests improved clinical outcomes of AF ablation using CF-sensing catheters; however, reviews to date have included data from multiple, distinct CF technologies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies comparing the use of ST versus other ablation catheters for the treatment of AF. A comprehensive search of electronic and manual sources was conducted. The primary endpoint was freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) at 12 months. Procedural and safety data were also analysed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies enrolling 5004 patients were eligible. The use of ST was associated with increased odds of freedom from AT at 12 months (71.0%vs60.8%; OR 1.454, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.88, p=0.004) over the comparator group, and the effect size was most evident in paroxysmal AF patients (75.6%vs64.7%; OR 1.560, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.24, p=0.015). Procedure and fluoroscopy times were shorter with ST (p=0.05 and p<0.01, respectively, vs comparator groups). The reduction in procedure time is estimated at 15.5 min (9.0%), and fluoroscopy time 4.8 min (18.7%). Complication rates, including cardiac tamponade, did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the use of other catheters, AF ablation using the CF-sensing ST catheter for AF is associated with improved success rates, shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times and similar safety profile.

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Automated Annotation-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation and 2nd-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Automated ablation lesion annotation with optimal settings for parameters including contact force (CF) and catheter stability may be effective for achieving durable pulmonary vein isolation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively examined 131 consecutive patients who underwent initial catheter ablation (CA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) by automatic annotation system (VISITAG module)-guided radiofrequency CA (RFCA) (n=61) and 2nd-generation cryoballoon ablation (CBA) (n=70) in terms of safety and long-term efficacy. The automatic annotation criteria for the RFCA group were as follows: catheter stability range of motion ≤1.5 mm, duration ≥5 s, and CF ≥5 g. We ablated for >20 s with a force-time integral >150 gs at each site, before moving to the next site. Each interlesion distance was <6 mm. Procedural complications were more frequent in the CBA group (1.6% vs. 10.0%, P=0.034). Across a median follow-up of 2.98 years, 88.5% and 70.0% of patients in the RFCA and CBA groups, respectively, were free from recurrence (log-rank test, P=0.0039). There was also a significant difference in favor of RFCA with respect to repeat ablations (3.3% vs. 24.3%, log-rank test, P=0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

RF ablation guided by an automated algorithm that includes CF and catheter stability parameters showed better long-term outcomes than CBA in the treatment of patients with PAF without increasing complications.

Low-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation with contact force and ultrasound technologies: a learning curve

Background

Fluoroscopy exposure during catheter ablation is a health hazard to patients and operators. This study presents the results of implementing a low-fluoroscopy workflow using modern contact force (CF) technologies in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation.

Methods

A fluoroscopy reduction workflow was implemented and subsequent catheter ablations for PAF were evaluated. After vascular access with ultrasound guidance, a THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH^® Catheter (ST) was advanced into the right atrium. The decapolar catheter was placed without fluoroscopy. A double-transseptal puncture was performed under intracardiac echocardiography guidance. ST and mapping catheters were advanced into the left atrium. A left atrial map was created, and pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was confirmed via entrance and exit block before and after the administration of isoproterenol or adenosine.

Results

Forty-three patients underwent PAF ablation with fluoroscopy reduction workflow (mean age: 66±9 years; 70% male), performed by five operators. Acute success rate (PV isolation) was 96.5% of PVs. One case of pericardial effusion, not requiring intervention, was the only acute complication. Mean procedure time was 217±42 minutes. Mean fluoroscopy time was 2.3±3.0 minutes, with 97.7% of patients having < 10 minutes and 86.0% having < 5 minutes. A significant downward trend over time was observed, suggesting a rapid learning curve for fluoroscopy reduction. Freedom from any atrial arrhythmias without reablation was 80.0% after a mean follow-up of 12±3 months.

Conclusion

Low fluoroscopy time is achievable with CF technologies after a short learning curve, without compromising patient safety or effectiveness.

Role of contact force in ischemic scar-related ventricular tachycardia ablation; optimal force required and impact of left ventricular access route

BACKGROUND

Contact force-sensing technology has become a widely used addition to catheter ablation procedures. Neither the optimal contact force required to achieve adequate lesion formation in the ventricle, nor the impact of left ventricular access route on contact force has been fully clarified.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 24) with ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent ablation for scar-related ventricular tachycardia were included in the study. All ablations (n = 25) were performed using irrigated contact force-sensing catheters (Smart Touch, Biosense Webster). Effective lesion formation was defined as electrical unexcitability post ablation at sites which were electrically excitable prior to ablation (unipolar pacing at 10 mA, 2 ms pulse width). We explored the contact force which achieved effective lesion formation and the impact of left ventricular access route (retrograde aortic or transseptal) on the contact force achieved in various segments of the left ventricle. Scar zone was defined as bipolar signal amplitude < 0.5 mV.

RESULTS

Among 427 ablation points, effective lesion formation was achieved at 201 points (47.1%). Contact force did not predict effective lesion formation in the overall group. However, within the scar zone, mean contact force ≥ 10 g was significantly associated with effective lesion formation [OR 3.21 (1.43, 7.19) P = 0.005]. In the 12-segment model of the left ventricle, the retrograde approach was associated with higher median contact force in the apical anterior segment (31 vs 19 g; P = 0.045) while transseptal approach had higher median force in the basal inferior segment (25 vs 15 g; P = 0.021). In the 4-segment model, the retrograde approach had higher force in the anterior wall (28 vs 16 g; P = 0.004) while the transseptal approach had higher force in the lateral wall (21 vs 18 g; P = 0.032). There was a trend towards higher force in the inferior wall with the transseptal approach, but this was not statistically significant (20 vs 15 g; P = 0.063).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, a mean contact force of 10 g or more within the scar zone had the best correlation with electrical unexcitability post ablation in our study. The retrograde aortic approach was associated with better contact force over the anterior wall while use of a transseptal approach had better contact force over the lateral wall.

Catheter radiofrequency ablation for arrhythmias under the guidance of the Carto 3 three-dimensional mapping system in an operating room without digital subtraction angiography

Several studies have reported the efficacy of a zero-fluoroscopy approach for catheter radiofrequency ablation of arrhythmias in a digital subtraction angiography (DSA) room. However, no reports are available on the ablation of arrhythmias in the absence of DSA in the operating room. To investigate the efficacy and safety of catheter radiofrequency ablation for arrhythmias under the guidance of a Carto 3 three-dimensional (3D) mapping system in an operating room without DSA. Patients were enrolled according to the type of arrhythmia. The Carto 3 mapping system was used to reconstruct heart models and guide the electrophysiologic examination, mapping, and ablation. The total procedure, reconstruction, electrophysiologic examination, and mapping times were recorded. Furthermore, immediate success rates and complications were also recorded. A total of 20 patients were enrolled, including 12 males. The average age was 51.3 ± 17.2 (19-76) years. Nine cases of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia, 7 cases of frequent ventricular premature contractions, 3 cases of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, and 1 case of typical atrial flutter were included. All arrhythmias were successfully ablated. The procedure time was 127.0 ± 21.0 (99-177) minutes, the reconstruction time was 6.5 ± 2.9 (3-14) minutes, the electrophysiologic study time was 10.4 ± 3.4 (6-20) minutes, and the mapping time was 11.7 ± 8.3 (3-36) minutes. No complications occurred. Radiofrequency ablation of arrhythmias without DSA is effective and feasible under the guidance of the Carto 3 mapping system. However, the electrophysiology physician must have sufficient experience, and related emergency measures must be present to ensure safety.

Individualized ablation strategy guided by live simultaneous global mapping to treat persistent atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinical arrhythmia encountered. Catheter ablation has become the first-line therapy for symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal and persistent AF. Although pulmonary vein electrical isolation is still the cornerstone of the ablation strategy, the clinical outcome particularly in treating persistent AF is suboptimal. Significant efforts have been applied with live global chamber mapping of AF aimed to identify patient-specific drivers and/or maintainers located outside of the pulmonary veins to further improve the outcome of catheter ablation. Within this review, we present an overview of contemporary global chamber AF mapping technologies and characteristics, with a particular focus on global, noncontact, dipole density mapping illustrated with a clinical case of persistent AF ablation using this novel methodology.

Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is the commonest arrhythmia which raises the risk of heart failure, thromboembolic stroke, morbidity and death. Pharmacological treatments of this condition are focused on heart rate control, rhythm control and reduction in risk of stroke. Selective ablation of cardiac tissues resulting in isolation of areas causing atrial fibrillation is another treatment strategy which can be delivered by two minimally invasive interventions: percutaneous catheter ablation and thoracoscopic surgical ablation. The main purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of these two interventions.

METHODS/DESIGN

Catheter Ablation versus Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (CASA-AF) is a prospective, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial within three NHS tertiary cardiovascular centres specialising in treatment of atrial fibrillation. Eligible adults (n = 120) with symptomatic, long-standing, persistent atrial fibrillation will be randomly allocated to either catheter ablation or thoracoscopic ablation in a 1:1 ratio. Pre-determined lesion sets will be delivered in each treatment arm with confirmation of appropriate conduction block. All patients will have an implantable loop recorder (ILR) inserted subcutaneously immediately following ablation to enable continuous heart rhythm monitoring for at least 12 months. The devices will be programmed to detect episodes of atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia ≥ 30 s in duration. The patients will be followed for 12 months, completing appropriate clinical assessments and questionnaires every 3 months. The ILR data will be wirelessly transmitted daily and evaluated every month for the duration of the follow-up. The primary endpoint in the study is freedom from atrial fibrillation and atrial tachycardia at the end of the follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

The CASA-AF Trial is a National Institute for Health Research-funded study that will provide first-class evidence on the comparative efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of thoracoscopic surgical ablation and conventional percutaneous catheter ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. In addition, the results of the trial will provide information on the effects on patients' quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN18250790 . Registered on 24 April 2015.

The Impact of Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Devices on the Incidence and Prevention of Complications

The number of patients with atrial fibrillation currently referred for catheter ablation is increasing. However, the number of trained operators and the capacity of many electrophysiology labs are limited. Accordingly, a steeper learning curve and technical advances for efficient and safe ablation are desirable. During the last decades several catheter-based ablation devices have been developed and adapted to improve not only lesion durability, but also safety profiles, to shorten procedure time and to reduce radiation exposure. The goal of this review is to summarise the reported incidence of complications, considering device-related specific aspects for point-by-point, multi-electrode and balloon-based devices for pulmonary vein isolation. Recent technical and procedural developments aimed at reducing procedural risks and complications rates will be reviewed. In addition, the impact of technical advances on procedural outcome, procedural length and radiation exposure will be discussed.

The quest for durable lesions in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation - technological advances in radiofrequency catheters and balloon devices

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and represents a growing clinical, social and economic challenge. Catheter ablation for symptomatic atrial fibrillation has evolved from an experimental procedure into a widespread therapy and offers a safe and effective treatment option. A prerequisite for durable PVI are transmural and contiguous circumferential lesions around the pulmonary veins. However, electrical reconnection of initially isolated pulmonary veins remains a primary concern and is a dominant factor for arrhythmia recurrence during long-term follow up. Areas covered: This article discusses the physiology of lesion formation using radiofrequency-, cryo- or laser- energy for pulmonary vein isolation and provides a detailed review of recent technological advancements in the field of radiofrequency catheters and balloon devices. Finally, future directions and upcoming developments for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation are discussed. Expert commentary: Durable conduction block across deployed myocardial lesions is mandatory not only for PVI but for any other cardiac ablation strategy as well. A major improvement urgently expected is the intraprocedural real-time distinction of durable lesions from interposed gaps with only transiently impaired electrical conduction. Furthermore, a simplification of ablation tools used for PVI is required to reduce the high technical complexity of the procedure.

Remote magnetic catheter navigation versus conventional ablation in atrial fibrillation ablation: Fluoroscopy reduction

Background

Percutaneous transcatheter radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation with remote controlled magnetic navigation (RMN) has been shown to reduce radiation exposure to patients and physicians compared with conventional manual (MAN) ablation techniques.

Methods

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation was performed utilizing RMN in 214 consecutive patients and MAN ablation techniques in 229 patients. We compared the fluoroscopy and procedural times between RMN and MAN catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Secondary objectives included comparing acute procedural success and short-term complication rates between both ablation strategies.

Results

Fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in the RMN group than the MAN group (53.5±30.1 vs 68.1±27.6 min, respectively; p<0.01); however, the total procedural time was longer in the RMN group (280.2±74.4 min vs 213.1±64.75, respectively; p>0.001). Further subgroup analysis of the most recent 50 ablations each from the RMN and MAN groups, to attenuate the RMN learning curve effect, showed an even greater difference in fluoroscopy time (RMN vs MAN: 53.5±30.1 vs 68.1±27.6 min), though a consistently longer procedure time with RMN (249.5±65.5 vs 186.3±65.6 min, respectively). The acute procedural success rate was comparable between the groups (98.6% vs 95.6%, respectively; p=0.07). The rates of acute complications were similar in both groups (2.3% vs 4.8%, respectively; p=0.16).

Conclusions

In radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation, RMN appears to significantly reduce fluoroscopy time compared with conventional MAN ablation, though at a cost of increased total procedural time, with comparable acute success rates and safety profile. A reduction in procedure and fluoroscopy times is possible with gaining experience.

Cryoballoon versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis of 16 Clinical Trials

Introduction: We aimed to study the procedural characteristics, efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to clinical trials comparing CBA and RFA for AF. Outcomes were evaluated for efficacy, procedure characteristics and safety. For each study, odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for endpoints for both approaches. Results: We analyzed a total of 9,957 participants (3,369 in the CBA and 6,588 in RFA group) enrolled in 16 clinical trials. No significant difference was observed between CBA and RFA with regards to freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12-months, recurrent atrial arrhythmias or repeat catheter ablation. CBA group had a significantly higher transient phrenic nerve injury (OR 14.19, 95% CI: 6.92-29.10; p<0.001) and persistent phrenic nerve injury (OR 4.62, 95% CI: 1.97-10.81; p<0.001); and a significantly lower pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade (OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.26-0.72; p=0.001), and groin site complications (OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38-0.93; p=0.02). No significant difference was observed in overall complications, stroke/thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and minor bleeding. Conclusion: CBA was non-inferior to RFA for catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF. RF ablation was associated with a higher groin complications and pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade, whereas CBA was associated with higher rates of transient and persistent phrenic nerve injury.

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With or Without Contact Force Sensing

INTRODUCTION

Arrhythmia recurrences remain common after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). Contact force (CF)-sensing catheters have been introduced for objective assessment of contact during radiofrequency application and have been suggested to improve outcomes in ablation of paroxysmal AF, but little is known about their role in PersAF ablation. We aimed to compare the procedural profiles and outcomes of (PersAF) ablation with or without using CF-sensing catheters.

METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing first time ablation for PersAF between April 2014 and January 2015 at the Cleveland Clinic were included. Substrate modification was performed in addition to isolation of the pulmonary veins. Success rates were determined off antiarrhythmics over 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

The study included 174 patients (77 CF and 97 non-CF). Ablation with CF-sensing catheters resulted in shorter procedures (median 204 vs. 216 minutes, P = 0.04) and shorter fluoroscopy time (36 vs. 48 minutes, P = 0.0005), without statistical difference in radiation dose (225 vs. 270 milligrays, P = 0.1). Arrhythmia recurrences were less likely to be observed in the CF-sensing group (27.6% vs. 46.4%, P = 0.01, log-rank P = 0.004). In multivariable Cox analyses, the use of CF-sensing catheters was associated with a lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence (hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.85, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to non-CF sensing, the use of CF-sensing catheters for PersAF ablation is associated with shorter procedures, shorter fluoroscopy time, and reduction in arrhythmia recurrences.

Reduction in radiation dose for atrial fibrillation ablation over time: A 12-year single-center experience of 2344 patients

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a well-established treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), with contact force (CF)-sensing catheters joining 3-dimensional mapping systems and image integration as technological advancements over the last decade.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in radiation exposure for AF ablation over the last 12 years at our center.

METHODS

We reviewed prospectively collected data of 2344 consecutive PVI procedures for either paroxysmal or persistent AF between January 2004 and December 2015. During this period, all cases used 3-dimensional mapping systems, with 8 software and 2 hardware upgrades. Primary endpoints were fluoroscopy time, absorbed dose (Air Kerma in mGy), and effective dose (mSv).

RESULTS

In total, 1914 patients underwent initial PVI, and 430 patients underwent redo PVI using radiofrequency energy. Fluoroscopy time, and absorbed and effective doses significantly and progressively decreased over the 12-year period for initial PVI as follows: 2004-2006: 61 ± 27 minutes; 2007-2009: 46 ± 14 minutes, 1365 ± 1369 mGy, 11.3 ± 12.5 mSv; 2010-2012: 31 ± 11, 464 ± 339 mGy, 9.0 ± 10.4 mSv; and 2013-2015: 17 ± 9 minutes, 304 ± 758 mGy, 5.5 ± 6.7 mSv. CF-sensing catheters were used for 357/508 PVI only cases between 2014 and 2015. Fluoroscopy times (11 ± 5 vs 21 ± 8 minutes; P <.001) and absorbed dose (200 ± 524 vs 470 ± 1326 mGy; P = .004) were significantly shorter with this catheter.

CONCLUSION

Radiation exposure has dramatically decreased over the last decade for PVI and is related to operator experience, annual case volume, technology evolution, and more recently CF-sensing catheters. This has significant implications for both patient and operator long-term risk.

Impact of contact force technology on reducing the recurrence and major complications of atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact force (CF) monitoring can be useful in accomplishing circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF). This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a CF-sensing catheter in treating AF. Randomized controlled trials or non-randomized observational studies comparing AF ablation using CF-sensing or standard non-CF (NCF)-sensing catheters were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (January 1, 1998-2016). A total of 19 studies were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was AF recurrence within 12 months, which significantly improved using CF-sensing catheters compared with using NCF-sensing catheters [31.1% vs. 40.5%; risk ratio (RR)=0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.93; p<0.05]. Further, the acute PV reconnection (10.1% vs. 24.2%; RR=0.45; 95% CI, 0.32-0.63; p<0.05) and incidence of major complications (1.8% vs. 3.1%; OR=0.59; 95% CI, 0.37-0.95; p<0.05) significantly improved using CF-sensing catheters compared with using NCF-sensing catheters. Procedure parameters such as procedure duration [mean difference (MD)=-28.35; 95% CI, -39.54 to -17.16; p<0.05], ablation time (MD=-3.8; 95% CI, -6.6 to -1.0; p<0.05), fluoroscopy duration (MD=-8.18; 95% CI, -14.11 to -2.24; p<0.05), and radiation dose (standard MD=-0.75; 95% CI, -1.32 to -0.18; p<0.05] significantly reduced using CF-sensing catheters. CF-sensing catheter ablation of AF can reduce the incidence of major complications and generate better outcomes compared with NCF-sensing catheters during the 12-month follow-up period.

Increasing the Single-Procedure Success Rate of Pulmonary Vein Isolation

To improve the single-procedural success and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation techniques for AF, there is a need for durable, contiguous and transmural lesions encircling the pulmonary veins (PV). Measurement of contact force (CF) between the catheter tip and the target tissue can optimise ablation procedures. A new approach to obtain single-procedure durable PV isolation (PVI) using the latest CF technology combined with the CARTO VISITAG™ Module with Ablation Index (Biosense Webster) has been shown in small studies to almost eliminate recurrence of paroxysmal AF at 1-year follow up and to make PVI procedures more reproducible. The use of a standardised workflow is expected to increase the reproducibility of results and to increase the efficiency of PVI procedures.

Contact Force and Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Catheters able to measure the force and vector of contact between the catheter tip and myocardium are now available. Pre-clinical work has established that the degree of contact between the radiofrequency ablation catheter and myocardium correlates with the size of the delivered lesion. Excess contact is associated with steam pops and perforation. Catheter contact varies within the left atrium secondary to factors including respiration, location, atrial rhythm and the trans-septal catheter delivery technology used. Compared with procedures performed without contact force (CF)-sensing, the use of this technology has, in some studies, been found to improve complication rates, procedure and fluoroscopy times, and success rates. However, for each of these parameters there are also studies suggesting a lack of difference from the availability of CF data. Nevertheless, CF-sensing technology has been adopted as a standard of care in many institutions. It is likely that use of CF-sensing technology will allow for the optimization of each individual radiofrequency application to maximize efficacy and procedural safety. Recent work has attempted to define what these optimal targets should be, and approaches to do this include assessing for sites of pulmonary vein reconnection after ablation, or comparing the impedance response to ablation. Based on such work, it is apparent that factors including mean CF, force time integral (the area under the force-time curve) and contact stability are important determinants of ablation efficacy. Multicenter prospective randomized data are lacking in this field and required to define the CF parameters required to produce optimal ablation.

Meta-Analysis of Zero or Near-Zero Fluoroscopy Use During Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias

Data regarding the efficacy and safety of zero or near-zero fluoroscopic ablation of cardiac arrhythmias are limited. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase for relevant studies through January 2016. Ten studies involving 2,261 patients were identified. Compared with conventional radiofrequency ablation method, zero or near-zero fluoroscopy ablation significantly showed reduced fluoroscopic time (standard mean difference [SMD] -1.62, 95% CI -2.20 to -1.05; p <0.00001), ablation time (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.04; p = 0.01), and radiation dose (SMD -1.94, 95% CI -3.37 to -0.51; p = 0.008). In contrast, procedure duration was not significantly different from that of conventional radiofrequency ablation (SMD -0.03, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.09; p = 0.58). There were no significant differences between both groups in immediate success rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.99, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.01; p = 0.99), long-term success rate (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.42 to 3.02; p = 0.81), complication rates (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.96; p = 0.95), and recurrence rates (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.24; p = 0.37). In conclusion, radiation was significantly reduced in the zero or near-zero fluoroscopy ablation groups without compromising efficacy and safety.

Localization of gaps during redo ablations of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Preferential patterns depending on the choice of cryoballoon ablation or radiofrequency ablation for the initial procedure

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, using cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation, is the cornerstone therapy for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs. One-third of the patients have recurrences, mainly due to PV reconnections.

AIMS

To describe the different locations of reconnection sites in patients who had previously undergone radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation, and to compare the characteristics of the redo procedures in both instances.

METHODS

Demographic data and characteristics of the initial ablation (cryoballoon or radiofrequency) were collected. Number and localization of reconduction gaps, and redo characteristics were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients scheduled for a redo ablation of paroxysmal AF were included; 38 had been treated by radiofrequency ablation and 36 by cryoballoon ablation during the first procedure. For the initial ablation, procedural and fluoroscopy times were significantly shorter for cryoballoon ablation (147.8±52.6min vs. 226.6±64.3min [P<0.001] and 37.0±17.7min vs. 50.8±22.7min [P=0.005], respectively). Overall, an identical number of gaps was found during redo procedures of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablations. However, a significantly higher number of gaps were located in the right superior PV for patients first ablated with radiofrequency (0.9±1.0 vs. 0.5±0.9; P=0.009). Gap localization displayed different patterns. Although not significant, redo procedures of cryoballoon ablation were slightly shorter and needed shorter durations of radiofrequency to achieve PV isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

During redo procedures, gap localization pattern is different for patients first ablated with cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation, and right superior PV reconnections occur more frequently after radiofrequency ablation. Redo ablation of a previous cryoballoon ablation appears to be easier.

The Hot and the Cold: Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drugs in maintaining sinus rhythm for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is the cornerstone of any AF ablation procedure. Conventionally, this is achieved by performing point by point lesions using radiofrequency (RF) energy. However, this is technically challenging, time consuming and is associated with a number of complications. Long-term durability of PV isolation is also a concern. To address these issues, 'one-shot' energy delivery systems and alternative energy sources have been developed. The cryoballoon system has emerged as the most commonly used alternative to point by point RF technology. In this paper, we compare the technology, biophysics and clinical data of cryoballoon to conventional RF ablation for AF. The safety and efficacy of cryoballoon compared to RF ablation is critically reviewed. We conclude by looking at future applications of this technology.

Two-Year Follow-Up after Contact Force Sensing Radiofrequency Catheter and Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparative Single Centre Study

Background. There are little comparative data on catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) using the contact force radiofrequency (CF-RF) catheter versus the second-generation cryoballoon (CB2). Methods and results. This is a single center, retrospective, nonrandomized study of 98 patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal AF who underwent their first PVI ablation using either the CB2 (n = 40) or CF-RF (n = 58). The mean age was 60 years with 63% men, a mean LA size of 42 mm. The procedure duration (74 ± 17 versus 120 ± 49 minutes p < 0.05) was shorter for CB2 group; the fluoroscopy time (14 ± 17 versus 16 ± 5 minutes, p = 0.45) was similar. Complete PVI was achieved in 96% of patients with RF-CF and 98% with CB2. Phrenic nerve palsies (2 transient and 1 persistent) occurred exclusively in the CB2 group and 1 severe, nonlethal complication (pericardial tamponade) occurred in the CF-RF group. At 24-month follow-up, the success rate, defined as freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) after a single procedure without antiarrhythmic drug, was comparable in CF-RF group and CB2 group (65.5% versus 67%, resp., log rank p = 0.54). Conclusion. Both the CB2 and the RF-CF ablation appeared safe; the success rate at 2 years was comparable between both technologies.

Randomized trial comparing pulmonary vein isolation using the SmartTouch catheter with or without real-time contact force data

BACKGROUND

Contact force (CF) information may improve the safety and efficacy of ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of CF data on ablation for PAF.

METHODS

Patients undergoing first-time PAF ablation were randomized at 7 UK centers to ablation with (CF-on) or without (CF-off) CF data available to the operator, using the same ablation catheter and mapping system. An ablation CF of 5-40g was targeted. Pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection was assessed with adenosine at 60 minutes. Follow-up for arrhythmia recurrence was for 1 year with 7-day Holter recordings at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

One hundred seventeen patients were studied (59 CF-on, 58 CF-off). In the CF-on group, a reduction in acute PV reconnection rates (22% vs 32%, P = .03) but no significant difference in 1-year success rates off antiarrhythmic drugs (49% vs 52%, P = .9) was observed. There was no difference in major complication rates: 2 of 59 (3%) CF-on, 3 of 58 (5%) CF-off (P = .7). Procedural and fluoroscopy times were not significantly different (P>.5). Overall mean CFs per ablation were not different between groups (13.4 [9.1-19.6]g CF-on, 13.4 [7.4-22.4]g CF-off, P = .5), but a greater proportion of readings in the CF-on group were in the target range (80% vs 68%, P<.001).

CONCLUSION

This randomized multicenter study demonstrated that CF data availability was associated with reduced acute PV reconnection but not improved 1-year success rates, procedural and fluoroscopy times, or complication rates. There was a reduction in extremes of CF, above and below the study target range, suggesting greater CF control during ablation.

Use of the new contact force sensing ablation catheter dramatically reduces fluoroscopy time during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures

OBJECTIVES

To study the impact of contact force (CF) sensing on fluoroscopy, procedure, left atrial (LA) and ablation times and number of ablations during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for symptomatic AF. Recently a new ablation catheter providing real-time CF has been approved for use.

METHODS

A nested case-control study was performed comparing radiofrequency ablation of AF using the irrigated CF-sensing ThermoCool SmartTouch catheter versus open-irrigated ThermoCool SF catheter (Biosense Webster, Inc., Diamond Bar, California). Demographic and procedure data were obtained and student t-test was used to compare data between groups.

RESULTS

Thirty consecutive adult patients were included with 15 patients in each group. Mean fluoroscopy time was significantly lower in CF group (19.4 ± 8 vs 40.7 ± 8 min, p < 0.0001). LA time was significantly lower in CF group (151.7 ± 44 vs 185.7 ± 35 min, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in procedure time between CF and SF groups (204 ± 37 vs 207 ± 36 min) and ablation time (121 ± 32 vs 122 ± 37 min). When patients who only underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were compared, fluoroscopy time was significantly lower in CF group (18 ± 9 vs 37.8 ± 5 min, p < 0.0001) as was LA time (141.4 ± 39 vs 171.8 ± 30 min, p = 0.04). Fluoroscopy time was also significantly lower in CF subgroup with additional ablation (20.9 ± 7 vs 44.9 ± 10 min, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Use of CF-sensing catheter significantly reduced fluoroscopy and LA times during AF ablation with similar acute efficacy.

Optimizing contact force during ablation of atrial fibrillation: available technologies and a look to the future

In a select atrial fibrillation population, catheter ablation is considered first-line therapy. Prevention of early reconnection of the isolated pulmonary veins is an important goal for a successful treatment. Here, adequate catheter–tissue contact is crucial. One of the most promising new advances, therefore, is contact force (CF) sensing technology. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of innovations regarding catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with a special focus on CF optimization. Both experimental and human studies show how CF sensing catheters lead to a reduction of fluoroscopy time, increased procedural safety and a better clinical outcome. Possible future developments include new parameters combining real-time ablation data, direct visualization of lesion formation and incorporation of robotics.

Impact of Contact Force Monitoring in Acute Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using an Anatomic Approach. A Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

The impact of contact force (CF) monitoring in pulmonary vein (PV) isolation after a circumferential anatomic ablation (CAA) is unknown. We analyze the usefulness of CF monitoring in acute PV isolation and procedure parameters using a CAA.

METHODS

Fifty patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomized into CF-on (CF >10 grams; n = 25) or CF-off (CF blinded; n = 25) groups. We performed a first round of CAA with a ThermoCool(®) SmartTouch(®) catheter blinded to the LASSO(®) catheter (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA), with radiofrequency (RF) lesions tagged with the VisiTag(™) Module. After the CAA, each PV was reviewed with the LASSO(®) catheter recording the segments with gaps.

RESULTS

All the PVs were isolated with a CAA in 20 patients of the CF-on versus eight of the CF-off (P = 0.001). Of the 45 segments with gaps in the left PVs, 38 were from the CF-off (P = 0.0001). Of the eight segments with gaps in the right PVs, seven were from the CF-off (P = 0.06). The CF in the left PVs was higher in the CF-on (16.3 ± 3.2 grams vs 10.5 ± 4.3 grams; P = 0.0001) and similar in the right PVs (17.6 ± 3.6 grams vs 15.2 ± 5.3 grams; P = 0.08). All of the gaps were closed with additional RF LASSO(®) -guided touch-up. Procedure and fluoroscopy times were shorter in the CF-on (139 ± 24 minutes vs 157 ± 32 minutes and 20 ± 6 minutes vs 24 ± 7 minutes; both P = 0.039). At 12 months the patients free of AF recurrence was 84% CF-on versus 75% CF-off (log-rank P = 0.4) [corrected].

CONCLUSIONS

In paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, a CAA guided by CF reduces PV gaps and shortens the procedure parameters at the expense of the left PVs.

Contact force-guided catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

Contact force (CF) sensing technology allows real-time monitoring during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the effect of CF sensing technology on procedural parameters and clinical outcomes still needs clarification. Because of the inconsistent results thus far in this area, we performed a meta-analysis to determine whether CF sensing technology can improve procedural parameters and clinical outcomes for the treatment of AF. Studies examining the benefits of CF sensing technology were identified in English-language articles by searching the MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases (inception to May 2015). Ten randomized, controlled trials involving 1834 patients (1263 males, 571 females) were included in the meta-analysis (681 in the CF group, 1153 in the control group). Overall, the ablation time was significantly decreased by 7.34 min (95%CI=-12.21 to -2.46; P=0.003, Z test) in the CF group compared with the control group. CF sensing technology was associated with significantly improved freedom from AF after 12 months (OR=1.55, 95%CI=1.20 to 1.99; P=0.0007) and complications were significantly lower in the CF group than in the control group (OR=0.50, 95%CI=0.29 to 0.87; P=0.01). However, fluoroscopy time analysis showed no significantly decreased trend associated with CF-guided catheter ablation (weighted mean difference: -2.59; 95%CI=-9.06 to 3.88; P=0.43). The present meta-analysis shows improvement in ablation time and freedom from AF after 12 months in AF patients treated with CF-guided catheter ablation. However, CF-guided catheter ablation does not decrease fluoroscopy time.

Impact of Complete Versus Incomplete Circumferential Lines Around the Pulmonary Veins During Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Background—

Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established treatment option for symptomatic patients. It is not known whether complete pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is superior to incomplete PVI with regard to the patients’ clinical outcome.

Methods and Results—

Patients with drug-refractory, symptomatic paroxysmal AF were randomly assigned to either incomplete (group A) or complete PVI (group B). In group A, a persistent gap was intentionally left within the circumferential ablation line, whereas in group B, complete PVI without any gaps was intended. At 3 months, all patients underwent invasive reevaluation to assess the rate of persistent PVI. Clinical follow-up was based on daily 30-s transtelephonic ECG transmissions. Primary study end point was the time to first recurrence of (symptomatic or asymptomatic) AF. A total of 233 patients were enrolled (116 in group A and 117 in group B). AF recurrence within 3 months was observed in a total of 161 patients (136 [84.5%] with symptomatic and 25 [15.5%] with asymptomatic AF); AF recurred in 62.2% of group B patients and 79.2% of group A patients ( P <0.001), for a difference in favor of complete PVI of 17.1% (95% confidence interval, 5.3%–28.9%). Invasive restudy in 103 group A patients and 93 group B patients revealed conduction gaps in 92 (89.3%) and 65 (69.9%) patients, respectively.

Conclusions—

This study proves the superiority of complete PVI over incomplete PVI with respect to AF recurrence within 3 months. However, the rate of electric reconduction 3 months after PVI is high in patients with initially isolated PVs.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT00293943.

Automatic 3D reconstruction of electrophysiology catheters from two-view monoplane C-arm image sequences

PURPOSE

Catheter guidance is a vital task for the success of electrophysiology interventions. It is usually provided through fluoroscopic images that are taken intra-operatively. The cardiologists, who are typically equipped with C-arm systems, scan the patient from multiple views rotating the fluoroscope around one of its axes. The resulting sequences allow the cardiologists to build a mental model of the 3D position of the catheters and interest points from the multiple views.

METHOD

We describe and compare different 3D catheter reconstruction strategies and ultimately propose a novel and robust method for the automatic reconstruction of 3D catheters in non-synchronized fluoroscopic sequences. This approach does not purely rely on triangulation but incorporates prior knowledge about the catheters. In conjunction with an automatic detection method, we demonstrate the performance of our method compared to ground truth annotations.

RESULTS

In our experiments that include 20 biplane datasets, we achieve an average reprojection error of 0.43 mm and an average reconstruction error of 0.67 mm compared to gold standard annotation.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice, catheters suffer from complex motion due to the combined effect of heartbeat and respiratory motion. As a result, any 3D reconstruction algorithm via triangulation is imprecise. We have proposed a new method that is fully automatic and highly accurate to reconstruct catheters in three dimensions.

Clinical significance of induced left atrial macro-reentrant tachycardia after pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of induced left atrial macro-reentrant tachycardia (LA-AT) after encircling pulmonary vein isolation (EPVI) is unclear. Our objective was to determine whether induced LA-ATs are associated with the clinical recurrence of ATs.

METHODS

We studied 185 consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who underwent their first EPVI with an 8-mm tip, nonirrigated catheter approach. AT was induced by atrial burst pacing after the completion of EPVI, and the atrial activation pattern was evaluated using EnSite NavX. Induced LA-ATs were ablated only in patients with clinical ATs of suspected LA origin. The factors associated with occurrence of AT after the procedure were examined.

RESULTS

LA-ATs were induced in 38 patients and ablated in 5 patients. During a follow-up of 23 ± 7 months, the occurrence of AT did not differ between patients with nonablated LA-ATs (4/33, 12 %) and those without any inducible ATs (16/113, 14 %, p > 0.99). In multivariate analysis, the number of ablation points for completing EPVI was the only independent predictor of AT occurrence (odds ratio 1.07, p < 0.01). A repeat procedure was performed in 22 of 26 patients who developed AT. Nineteen patients became free from AT and AF after ablation of the conduction gaps (EPVI, n = 17; another line, n = 4), extra PV firing (n = 4), focal AT (n = 4), and induced LA-ATs (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who had EPVI for PAF using an 8-mm tip, nonirrigated catheter, the occurrence of AT after EPVI was mainly due to conduction gaps in the ablation line or extra PV triggers. In patients with PAF, LA-ATs induced during the first procedure did not require ablation if they were not associated with clinical AT.