Comparison of Left Atrial Bipolar Voltage and Scar Using Multielectrode Fast Automated Mapping versus Point-by-Point Contact Electroanatomic Mapping in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Repeat Ablation

Feasibility of Atrial Substrate Mapping During Atrial Pacing and Its Impact on the Omnipolar Voltage and the Peak-Frequency of Electrograms

INTRODUCTION

Atrial pacing maps are often used as substitutes for sinus rhythm (SR) maps to expedite mapping procedures. However, the impact of this method on electrophysiological parameters has not been systematically examined. This study aimed to elucidate the advantages and limitations of atrial pacing maps.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 21 patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, left atrial (LA) substrate maps using an HD-grid catheter were performed during SR, and pacing from the sinus-node region with cycle lengths (CLs) of 300 ms (SN-P300) and 600 ms (SN-P600). Mapping time, omnipolar voltage, peak-frequency of electrograms, and global LA activation time were compared among the three maps. The SR-map more frequently required automap-setting changes (p < 0.01), and one SR-map was not completed due to CL-fluctuation. Compared to SR, mapping time significantly decreased (833 [702-1097] seconds for SR vs. 615 [530-700] seconds for SN-P600 and 463 [404-542] seconds for SN-P300, p < 0.01). Mean voltage and peak-frequency of electrograms significantly decreased in SN-P600 and SN-P300 (mean voltage: 2.5 [2.1-3.2] mV for SR vs. 2.3 [2.1-2.8] mV for SN-P600 and 2.2 [2.0-2.7] mV for SN-P300, p < 0.01; mean peak-frequency: 308 [299-325] Hz for SR vs. 303 [288-314] Hz for SN-P600 and 281 [258-295] Hz for SN-P300, p < 0.01). The wavefront collision site shifted in 3/20 (15%) between SR and SN-P600, remaing within 30° along the mitral annulus, but this shift reached 9/20 (45%) between SR and SN-P300, including one patient showing a shift up to 60°.

CONCLUSION

SN-P maps provide faster, higher-resolution substrate maps, but the amplitude and frequency of electrograms may be reduced as the CL shortens. Maps with SN-P600 may be acceptable, maintaining electrophysiological information in SR.

The Influence of Different Multipolar Mapping Catheter Types on Procedural Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation

(1) Background: During pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), multipolar mapping catheters (MMC) are often used. We aimed to compare the procedural outcomes of two MMCs, specifically a circular-shaped and a five-spline-shaped MMC. (2) Methods: We enrolled 70 consecutive patients in our prospective, observational trial undergoing PVI procedures for paroxysmal AF. The initial 35 patients underwent PVI procedures with circular-shaped MMC guidance (Lasso Group), and the procedures for the latter 35 cases were performed using five-spline-shaped MMC (PentaRay Group). (3) Results: No significant differences were identified between the two groups in total procedure time (80.2 ± 17.7 min vs. 75.7 ± 14.8 min, p = 0.13), time from femoral vein puncture to the initiation of the mapping (31.2 ± 7 min vs. 28.9 ± 6.8, p = 0.80), mapping time (8 (6; 13) min vs. 9 (6.5; 10.5) min, p = 0.73), duration between the first and last ablation (32 (30; 36) min vs. 33 (26; 40) min, p = 0.52), validation time (3 (2; 4) min vs. 3 (1; 5) min, p = 0.46), first pass success rates (89% vs. 91%, p = 0.71), left atrial dwelling time (46 (37; 53) min vs. 45 (36.5; 53) min, p = 0.56), fluoroscopy data (time: 150 ± 71 s vs. 143 ± 56 s, p = 0.14; dose: 6.7 ± 4 mGy vs. 7.4 ± 4.4 mGy, p = 0.90), total ablation time (1187 (1063; 1534) s vs. 1150.5 (1053; 1393.5) s, p = 0.49), the number of ablations (78 (73; 93) vs. 83 (71.3; 92.8), p = 0.60), and total ablation energy (52,300 (47,265; 66,804) J vs. 49,666 (46,395; 56,502) J, p = 0.35). (4) Conclusions: This study finds comparable procedural outcomes bet-ween circular-shaped and five-spline-shaped MMCs for PVI in paroxysmal AF, supporting their interchangeability in clinical practice for anatomical mapping.

Atrial conduction velocity mapping: clinical tools, algorithms and approaches for understanding the arrhythmogenic substrate

Characterizing patient-specific atrial conduction properties is important for understanding arrhythmia drivers, for predicting potential arrhythmia pathways, and for personalising treatment approaches. One metric that characterizes the health of the myocardial substrate is atrial conduction velocity, which describes the speed and direction of propagation of the electrical wavefront through the myocardium. Atrial conduction velocity mapping algorithms are under continuous development in research laboratories and in industry. In this review article, we give a broad overview of different categories of currently published methods for calculating CV, and give insight into their different advantages and disadvantages overall. We classify techniques into local, global, and inverse methods, and discuss these techniques with respect to their faithfulness to the biophysics, incorporation of uncertainty quantification, and their ability to take account of the atrial manifold.

Classification of Left Atrial Diseased Tissue Burden Determined by Automated Voltage Analysis Predicts Outcomes after Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Background

The burden and persistence of atrial fibrillation (AF) have been associated with the presence and extent of left atrial (LA) fibrosis. Recent reports have implicated an association between the extent of LA fibrosis and the outcome of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We aimed to analyse the value of an automated scar quantification method in the prediction of success following PVI.

Methods

One hundred and nine consecutive patients undergoing PVI for paroxysmal or persistent AF were included in our observational study with a 2-year follow-up. Prior to PVI, patients underwent high-definition LA electroanatomical mapping, and scar burden was quantified by automated software (Voltage Histogram Analysis, CARTO 3, Biosense Webster), then classified into 4 subgroups (Dublin Classes I-IV). Recurrence rates were analysed on and off antiarrhythmic drug therapy (AAD), respectively.

Results

The overall success rate was 74% and 67% off AAD at 1- and 2-year follow-up, respectively. Patients with Dublin Class IV had significantly lower success rates (p = 0.008, off AAD). Dublin Class IV (OR = 2.27, p = 0.022, off AAD) and the presence of arrhythmia in the blanking period (OR = 3.28, p = 0.001, off AAD) were the only significant predictors of recurrence. The use of AAD did not affect these results.

Conclusions

We propose a classification of low voltage areas based on automated quantification by software during 3D mapping prior to PVI. Patients with high burden of low voltage areas (>31% of <0.5 mV, Dublin Class IV) have a higher risk of recurrence following PVI. Information gathered during electroanatomical mapping may have important prognostic value.

Impact of Left Atrial Bipolar Electrogram Voltage on First Pass Pulmonary Vein Isolation During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

Background

First pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is associated with durable isolation and reduced recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF).

Objective

We sought to investigate the relationship between left atrial electrogram voltage using multielectrode fast automated mapping (ME-FAM) and first pass isolation with radiofrequency ablation.

Methods

We included consecutive patients (pts) undergoing first time ablation for paroxysmal AF (pAF), and compared the voltage characteristics between patients with and without first pass isolation. Left atrium (LA) adjacent to PVs was divided into 6 regions, and mean voltages obtained with ME-FAM (Pentaray, Biosense Webster) in each region and compared. LA electrograms with marked low voltage (<0.5 mV) were identified and the voltage characteristics at the site of difficult isolation was compared to the voltage in adjacent region.

Results

Twenty consecutive patients (10 with first pass and 10 without) with a mean age of 63.3 ± 6.2 years, 65% males, were studied. Difficult isolation occurred on the right PVs in eight pts and left PVs in three pts. The mean voltage in pts without first pass isolation was lower in all 6 regions; posterior wall (1.93 ± 1.46 versus 2.99 ± 2.19; p < 0.001), roof (1.83 ± 2.29 versus 2.47 ± 1.99; p < 0.001), LA-LPV posterior (1.85 ± 3.09 versus 2.99 ± 2.19, p < 0.001), LA-LPV ridge (1.42 ± 1.04 versus 1.91 ± 1.61; p < 0.001), LA-RPV posterior (1.51 ± 1.11 versus 2.30 ± 1.77, p < 0.001) and LA-RPV septum (1.55 ± 1.23 versus 2.31 ± 1.40, p < 0.001). Patients without first pass isolation also had a larger percentage of signal with an amplitude of <0.5 mV for each of the six regions (12.8% versus 7.5%). In addition, the mean voltage at the site of difficult isolation was lower at 8 out of 11 sites compared to mean voltage for remaining electrograms in that region.

Conclusion

In patients undergoing PVI for paroxysmal AF, failure in first pass isolation was associated with lower global LA voltage, more marked low amplitude signal (<0.5 mV) and lower local signal voltage at the site with difficult isolation. The results suggest that a greater degree of global and segmental fibrosis may play a role in ease of PV isolation with radiofrequency energy.

Left atrial scar identification and quantification in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation

Identification and quantification of low voltage areas (LVA) in atrial fibrillation (AF), identified by their bipolar voltages (BiV) via electro-anatomical voltage mapping is an area of interest to prognosis of AF free burden. LVAs have been linked to diseased left atrial (LA) tissue which results in pro-fibrillatory potentials. These LVAs are dominantly found within the pulmonary veins, however, as the disease progresses other areas of the LA show low voltage. The scar burden of the LA is linked to recurrence of the arrhythmia and can be a target of further modification. This burden is classically assessed once sinus rhythm (SR) is attained, but this is susceptible to operator variability with overestimated dense LA scar (<0.2 mV) and underestimated diseased LA tissue (<0.5 mV). The novel automated voltage histogram analysis (VHA) tool may increase accuracy, however, is yet to be fully validated. A recent study indicates that LVAs can be assessed just as reliably in AF as SR, but BiV is lower with linear correlation to SR values (0.24-0.5 mV respectively). In this paper, we review current data as well as review current methods of identifying, quantifying, and grading LA scar. We also compared AF vs SR voltages of a patient undergoing catheter ablation in our site using our VHA tool to compare the results. In keeping with the cited papers, we found lower voltages in our patient measured in AF. This area warrants further study to assess correlation in more patients, with view to developing prognostic and therapeutic grading systems.

Reduction of mapping time in pulmonary vein isolation using atrial pacing during left atrial voltage map acquisition

INTRODUCTION

3D mapping systems are used during radiofrequency (RF) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to facilitate catheter navigation and to provide additional electroanatomical information as a surrogate marker for the presence and location of fibrotic atrial myocardium. Electric voltage information can only be measured when the myocardium is depolarized. Low heart rates or frequent premature atrial beats can significantly prolong creation of detailed left atrial voltage maps. This study was designed to evaluate the potential advantage of voltage information collection during atrial pacing instead of acquisition during sinus rhythm.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 40 patients were included in the study, in 20 consecutive patients voltage mapping was performed during sinus rhythm, and in the following 20 patients during atrial pacing. The average age of the included patients was 69.5 ± 9.4, 17 of 40 patients (43%) were male. All procedures were performed using the Carto 3D Mapping system. For LA voltage mapping, a multipolar circular mapping catheter was used. The atrium was paced via the proximal coronary sinus catheter electrodes with a fixed cycle length of 600 ms. By mapping during atrial pacing mapping time was reduced by 35% (441 s. (±141) vs. 683 s. (±203) p = 0.029) while a higher number of total mapping points were acquired (908 ± 560 vs. 581 ± 150, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Acquiring left atrial low voltage maps during atrial pacing significantly reduces mapping time. As pacing also improves comparability of left atrial electroanatomical maps we suggest that this approach may be considered as a standard during these procedures.

Electroanatomic Mapping to determine Scar Regions in patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Left atrial voltage maps are routinely acquired during electroanatomic mapping in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). For patients, who have prior catheter ablation when they are in sinus rhythm (SR), the voltage map can be used to identify low voltage areas (LVAs) using a threshold of 0.2 - 0.45 mV. However, such a voltage threshold for maps acquired during AF has not been well established. A prerequisite for defining a voltage threshold is to maximize the topologically matched LVAs between the electroanatomic mapping acquired during AF and SR. This paper demonstrates a new technique to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the matched LVA. This is achieved by computing omni-directional bipolar voltages and applying Gaussian Process Regression based interpolation to derive the AF map. The proposed method is evaluated on a test cohort of 7 male patients, and a total of 46,589 data points were included in analysis. The LVAs in the posterior left atrium and pulmonary vein junction are determined using the standard method and the proposed method. Overall, the proposed method showed patient-specific sensitivity and specificity in matching LVAs of 75.70% and 65.55% for a geometric mean of 70.69%. On average, there was an improvement of 3.00% in the geometric mean, 7.88% improvement in sensitivity, 0.30% improvement in specificity compared to the standard method. The results show that the proposed method is an improvement in matching LVA. This may help develop the voltage threshold to better identify LVA in the left atrium for patients in AF.

Postablation Atrial Arrhythmias

Atrial arrhythmias, including atrial tachycardia and atrial flutter, are not uncommon after prior ablation. Mechanisms for arrhythmogenesis may vary and include recurrent conduction through sites of ablation, leading to recurrence of prior ablated arrhythmias and creation of new substrate. Incidence of postablation atrial arrhythmias varies across studies and may relate to the approach to ablation, including extent of ablation performed, or to extent of substrate identified at the time of prior ablation and how that relates to the lesion set. In addition, postablation atrial arrhythmias may be more common in certain types of cardiomyopathy, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Association between prolonged P wave duration and left atrial scarring in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the association of P wave duration (PWD) with left atrial scar (LAS) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with PAF undergoing their first catheter ablation were screened and only those in sinus rhythm at baseline were included in the analysis. A standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed in all and three-dimensional voltage mapping of the left atrium was generated for identification of low-voltage areas (≤0.2 mV) before the procedure.

RESULTS

In total, 411 patients with PAF were included in this study of which 181 had LASs (scar group), while 230 had no scar (nonscar group). In the scar group, patients were older (65.5 ± 8.8 vs 59.7 ± 11.7 years; P < .001), the proportion of female was higher (47.5% vs 37.4%; P = .04) and left atrial (LA) diameter (4.1 ± 0.6 vs 3.9 ± 0.6 cm; P < .001) was larger compared with the nonscar group. There was no significant difference in terms of hypertension, sleep apnea, and diabetes between the two groups. When comparing ECG characteristics between the two groups, PWD was significantly longer in the scar group (122.9 ± 18.5 and 116.9 ± 28.0 ms; P = .01). A multivariate analysis was performed, after adjustment of age, sex, LA diameter, PWD ≥ 120 ms was found to be an independent predictor of LA scarring (OR: 1.69, p-value: 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In the current series, prolonged PWD was found to be independently associated with LA scarring in PAF, even after adjustment for age, sex, and LA diameter.

Left atrial voltage mapping: defining and targeting the atrial fibrillation substrate

Low atrial endocardial bipolar voltage, measured during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), is a commonly used surrogate marker for the presence of atrial fibrosis. Low voltage shows many useful associations with clinical outcomes, comorbidities and has links to trigger sites for AF. Several contemporary trials have shown promise in targeting low voltage areas as the substrate for AF ablation; however, the results have been mixed. In order to understand these results, a thorough understanding of voltage mapping techniques, the relationship between low voltage and the pathophysiology of AF, as well as the inherent limitations in voltage measurement are needed. Two key questions must be answered in order to optimally apply voltage mapping as the road map for ablation. First, are the inherent limitations of voltage mapping small enough as to be ignored when targeting specific tissue based on voltage? Second, can conventional criteria, using a binary threshold for voltage amplitude, truly define the extent of the atrial fibrotic substrate? Here, we review the latest clinical evidence with regard to voltage-based ablation procedures before analysing the utility and limitations of voltage mapping. Finally, we discuss omnipole mapping and dynamic voltage attenuation as two possible approaches to resolving these issues.

High-resolution Mapping in Patients with Persistent AF

Ablation of AF through electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins is a well-established technique and a cornerstone in the ablation of AF, although there are a variety of techniques and ablation strategies now available. However, high numbers of patients are returning to hospital after ablation procedures such as pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Scar tissue (as identified by contact voltage mapping) is found to be present in many of these patients, especially those with persistent AF and even those with paroxysmal AF. This scarring is associated with poor outcomes after PVI. Cardiac mapping is necessary to locate triggers and substrate so that an ablation strategy can be optimised. Multipolar mapping catheters offer more information regarding the status of the tissue than standard ablation catheters. A patient-tailored catheter ablation approach, targeting the patient-specific low voltage/fibrotic substrate can lead to improved outcomes.

Comparison of electrogram waveforms between a multielectrode mapping catheter and a linear ablation catheter

BACKGROUND

Smaller low-voltage areas (LVAs) obtained by multielectrode catheters were reported than those by linear ablation catheters. However, the underlying electrogram difference has not been elucidated. This study aimed to compare the two mapping catheters' measurements of electrogram waveforms and LVAs.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included 17 consecutive patients undergoing ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. Following pulmonary vein isolation, voltage mapping during sinus rhythm was performed once using the ablation catheter, and once using the multielectrode catheter. Approximately 20 pairs of mapping points at approximately the same position between the two voltage maps were manually selected evenly throughout the left atrium.

RESULTS

Voltage mapping with the multielectrode catheter demonstrated smaller LVAs, defined as <0.50 mV (5.9 [3.3, 11.0] vs 9.7 [6.6, 16.9] cm² ) than those mapped with the ablation catheter. The two mapping catheters' voltage amplitudes of all pairs of mapping points correlated well (r = 0.81, P < 0.0001) overall, but they did not correlate within diseased areas (either voltage <0.50 mV). The voltage amplitude difference between the two catheters ([Vol_Multi  - Vol_Abl ]/Vol_Abl × 100) was greater in the diseased areas (37.4% [-9.8%, 147%]) than in the healthy areas (both voltages ≥0.50 mV, 26.2% [-13.0%, 92.8%], P = 0.014). The electrogram waveform of the multiple electrode catheter displayed a higher voltage amplitude, shorter duration, greater number of peaks, and lower dull peak ratio (number of dull peaks/total peaks) than that of the ablation catheter.

CONCLUSION

The multielectrode catheter produced smaller LVA measurements with sharper and higher voltage electrograms compared to the ablation catheter, specifically in diseased areas.

Early and Delayed Alteration of Atrial Electrograms Around Single Radiofrequency Ablation Lesion

Purpose: The acute effect of radiofrequency (RF) ablation includes local necrosis and oedema. We investigated the spatiotemporal change of atrial electrograms in the area surrounding the site of single standardized pulse of RF energy.

Methods: The study enrolled 12 patients (45–67 years, 10 males) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing ablation procedure with irrigated-tip ablation catheter and 3D navigation. The high-density mapping/remapping (129 ± 63 points) within the circular area with radius of ~10 mm, centered at the pre-specified posterior left pulmonary vein antrum ablation site was performed at baseline, immediately after single RF energy delivery (25 W, 30 s, 20 ml/min) and after 30 min waiting period. Bipolar voltages of atrial electrograms (A-EGM-biV) were averaged within the central and 12 adjacent left atrium segments and their relative change was studied.

Results: After the ablation, overall A-EGM-biV within the mapping zone (3.51 ± 1.89 mV at baseline) reduced to 2.83 ± 1.77 mV (immediately) and to 2.68 ± 1.58 mV (after 30 min waiting period). In per-segment pair-wise comparison, we observed highly significant change in A-EGM-biV that extended up to the distance of 8.8 mm from the lesion core. The maximum early A-EGM-biV attenuation by 39–49% (P < 0.001) was registered in segments adjacent to pulmonary vein ostia. The subsequent (delayed) A-EGM-biV reduction by 17–24% (P < 0.05) was observed in opposite direction from the lesion center.

Conclusions: Significant alteration of atrial electrograms was detectable rather distant from the central lesion. Spatiotemporal development of ablation lesion was eccentric/asymmetric. While acute A-EGM-biV reduction can be attributed predominantly to direct thermal injury, delayed effects are probably due to oedema progression.

Gains in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using a Standardized Workflow to Optimize Contact Force Technologies

Background

Catheter ablation technology has evolved rapidly in recent years. There is a need to understand the impact of these advances on efficiency, safety, and effectiveness in real-world populations. The objective of this study was to evaluate a standardized workflow that integrates a contact force (CF) catheter and stability module in an attempt to optimize efficiency and clinical outcomes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation, and to compare the outcomes of this workflow with existing ablation technologies at a high-volume center.

Methods

Consecutive ablations for PAF from July 2013 - June 2016 were included. Radiofrequency (RF) ablations were performed with the ThermocoolSF Catheter (SF) through April 2014, after which a change was made to the ThermocoolSmarttouchCatheter (ST)with a standardized workflow. Cryoballoon ablations (CA) were performed with theArctic FrontAdvancebetween July 2013 and March 2016. Systematic collection of 12-month effectiveness data began in July 2014. Prior to that time, only acute outcomes and reablations were captured.

Results

Procedural data for 32 SF, 232 ST, and 59 CA procedures for PAF were available. Mean procedure times were similar across SF and CA, and moderately shorter with ST (p=0.0201). Fluoroscopy times were substantially reduced with ST (p<0.0001). Complication rates were low and similar across all cohorts (p=0.4744), whereas reablation rates were lowest in the ST cohort (p=0.0194).

Conclusions

PAF ablation using integrated CF and catheter stability technology with a systematic ablation workflow maylead to improvements in both procedural efficiency and reablation rates, without compromising patient safety.

Left atrial voltage mapping using a new impedance-based algorithm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Atrial fibrosis is associated with the pathogenesis and progression of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to evaluate the extent of left atrial (LA) scarring in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) undergoing catheter ablation using a new impedance-based algorithm.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 73 consecutive patients (43 males, 58 years) with PAF who underwent pulmonary vein antral isolation. We first performed high-density bipolar voltage mapping during sinus rhythm using Tissue Proximity Indicator (TPI), one of the features of the ConfiDense mapping module integrated in the electroanatomic mapping system. A dense LA shell was created initially without TPI (mean points 2,411) and subsequently activating TPI (mean points 1,167). Each point was classified according to the peak-to-peak bipolar voltage electrogram based on two criteria (criterion A: healthy >0.8 mV, border zone: 0.4-0.8 mV, scarred: <0.4 mV; criterion B: healthy: >0.5 mV, border zone: 0.25-0.5 mV, scarred: <0.25 mV).

RESULTS

LA voltage analysis represented significantly smaller scarred areas when mapping was performed with TPI-ON compared with TPI-OFF in both voltage criteria (average LA voltage area: 3.02 ± 5.28 cm2 vs 9.15 ± 13.11 cm2 vs in criterion A and 1.19 ± 2.54 cm2 vs 5.61 ± 9.56 cm2 in criterion B). A statistically significant voltage difference was observed in all segments of the left atrium between the two mapping protocols, particularly on the inferior wall.

CONCLUSION

A more specific delineation of LA fibrosis may be produced using the TPI feature of the ConfiDense mapping module, through elimination of false-positive annotated mapping points due to low contact.

Point-by-point versus multisite electrode mapping in VT ablation: does freedom from VT recurrences depend on mapping catheter? An observational study

PURPOSE

This study was conducted with the purpose of determining whether or not the potential technical advantages of multi-electrode mapping catheters in catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) result in any relevant clinical benefit for VT patients.

METHODS

A single-center VT study, having taken place from 2012 to 2014 using a standard 3.5-mm catheter (Thermocool SF® group 1) and from 2014 to 2016 using a 1-mm multi-electrode-mapping catheter (PentaRay® group 2), was conducted. The endpoint was the complete elimination of late potentials (LPs), local abnormal ventricular activities (LAVA), and VT non-inducibility. Follow-up consisted of device interrogation to monitor for VT recurrence.

RESULTS

Out of 74 VT patients aged 64.5 ± 12.0 years (66 male [89.2%], 56 with ICM [75.7%], and 18 with NICM [24.3%)]), 48 patients (64.9%) were investigated in group 1 and 26 (35.1%) in group 2. Using the multi-point acquisition approach, a tendency to require less mapping time (group 1 65.2 ± 37.6 min, group 2 55.6 ± 34.4 min, p ns) was determined. During 12-month follow-up, 57 patients had freedom from VT recurrences (79.2%). The result was insignificant between the groups (38 patients (79.2%) in group 1 and 19 patients (73.1%) in group 2).

CONCLUSIONS

In a single-center observational study, both conventional and high-density mapping approaches in VT patients are comparable in terms of procedure duration and outcome. Mapping time when using a multi-electrode catheter seems to have the tendency of being shorter. We should be encouraged to recruit more patients comparing the benefit of different catheter types.

Multimodal Examination of Atrial Fibrillation Substrate: Correlation of Left Atrial Bipolar Voltage Using Multi-Electrode Fast Automated Mapping, Point-by-Point Mapping, and Magnetic Resonance Image Intensity Ratio

Background

Bipolar voltage mapping, as part of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, is traditionally performed in a point-by-point (PBP) approach using single-tip ablation catheters. Alternative techniques for fibrosis-delineation include fast-anatomical mapping (FAM) with multi-electrode circular catheters, and late gadolinium-enhanced magnetic-resonance imaging (LGE-MRI). The correlation between PBP, FAM, and LGE-MRI fibrosis assessment is unknown.

Objective

In this study, we examined AF substrate using different modalities (PBP, FAM, and LGE-MRI mapping) in patients presenting for an AF ablation.

Methods

LGE-MRI was performed pre-ablation in 26 patients (73% males, age 63±8years). Local image-intensity ratio (IIR) was used to normalize myocardial intensities. PBP- and FAM-voltage maps were acquired, in sinus rhythm, prior to ablation and co-registered to LGE-MRI.

Results

Mean bipolar voltage for all 19,087 FAM voltage points was 0.88±1.27mV and average IIR was 1.08±0.18. In an adjusted mixed-effects model, each unit increase in local IIR was associated with 57% decrease in bipolar voltage (p<0.0001). IIR of >0.74 corresponded to bipolar voltage <0.5 mV. A total of 1554 PBP-mapping points were matched to the nearest FAM-point. In an adjusted mixed-effects model, log-FAM bipolar voltage was significantly associated with log-PBP bipolar voltage (ß=0.36, p<0.0001). At low-voltages, FAM-mapping distribution was shifted to the left compared to PBP-mapping; at intermediate voltages, FAM and PBP voltages were overlapping; and at high voltages, FAM exceeded PBP-voltages.

Conclusion

LGE-MRI, FAM and PBP-mapping show good correlation in delineating electro-anatomical AF substrate. Each approach has fundamental technical characteristics, the awareness of which allows proper assessment of atrial fibrosis.