Characteristics of the nonpulmonary vein foci induced after second‐generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Preprocedural Screening Tool to Guide Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Testing in First-Time Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing first-time atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can benefit from targeting non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers. Preprocedural identification of high-risk individuals can guide planning of ablation strategy. This study aimed to create a preprocedural screening tool to identify patients at risk of non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation.

METHODS

All patients who underwent first-time AF ablation at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 2018 and 2022 were identified. Those who underwent non-PV trigger provocative maneuvers or had spontaneous non-PV trigger firing were included. Non-PV triggers were defined as non-PV ectopic beats triggering AF or sustained focal atrial tachycardia that occurred spontaneously, after AF cardioversion, or after standard provocative maneuvers. The provocative maneuvers included incremental isoproterenol infusion (3, 6, 12, and 20-30 µg/min) and an atrial burst pacing protocol. Risk factors associated with non-PV triggers in a stepwise multivariable logistic regression model with backward elimination were used to create a risk score.

RESULTS

A total of 163 (8.0%) of 2038 patients had non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation. Based on the multivariable model, we created a risk score using female sex (1 point; odds ratio [OR], 1.90 [95% CI, 1.36-2.67]), sinus node dysfunction (1 point; OR, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.04-3.24]), prior cardiac surgery (1 point; OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.45-3.53]), moderate to severe left atrial enlargement (2 points; OR, 3.43 [95% CI, 2.46-4.79]), and cardiac sarcoidosis/amyloidosis (4 points; OR, 7.24 [95% CI, 3.03-17.33]). Internal validation using bootstrap resampling showed an optimism-adjusted C statistic of 0.715 (95% CI, 0.678-0.751). Among all first-time AF ablations, 68.1% of procedures were low-risk for non-PV triggers (scores 0-1, 4.3% risk), 17.8% were intermediate-risk (score 2, 10.5% risk), and 14.1% were high-risk (score ≥3, 22.6% risk).

CONCLUSIONS

A preprocedural screening tool can classify patients based on their risk of non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation. This risk score can guide operators to identify patients who would benefit most from adjunctive non-PV trigger testing. However, further validation is needed to confirm these findings.

Epicardial connection between superior vena cava and right atrium contributes to subsequent atrial fibrillation: a case report

Background

The superior vena cava (SVC) acts as a non-pulmonary vein (PV) trigger for atrial fibrillation (AF) in 2%-6% of patients and harbours 25%-40% of non-PV foci. Approximately 10% of patients with AF have epicardial connections (ECs) between the atrium and PV inside the PV isolation lines, which are associated with AF recurrence. However, the contribution of EC(s) between the SVC and right atrium (RA) to subsequent AF remains unknown.

Case summary

A 76-year-old woman underwent ablation for recurrent AF. She had undergone cryo-balloon ablation for paroxysmal AF 3 years previously. After confirming the complete entrance and exit blocks of the four PVs, SVC firing-induced AF was observed. After SVC isolation, the EC between the SVC and RA was observed. No AF was induced after EC ablation.

Discussion

Although the mechanisms of ECs in the SVC and RA have not been entirely elucidated, several potential mechanisms have been proposed. (i) Anatomically inherited myofibres/bundles may run through the epicardial side between the SVC and RA. (ii) Epicardial connections between the right PV and the SVC or RA have been recently reported. Thus, we might speculate on the possibility of the existence of EC(s) between the right PV and both the SVC and RA. After cryoablation in the first session, the connection between the SVC and RA remained, which might have acted as EC(s). Thus, physicians should consider the possibility of EC(s) when remaining potentials in the SVC are observed, even though the SVC isolation line seems to be completed.

Embryological Classification of Arrhythmogenic Triggers Initiating Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent multifactorial arrhythmia associated with specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is an established treatment for AF; however, recurrence risk remains caused by AF triggers beyond the PVs. Understanding the embryological origins of these triggers could improve treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the association between embryologically categorized AF triggers, clinical and genetic backgrounds, and postablation prognosis.

METHODS

In cohort 1, comprising 3,067 patients with AF undergoing PV isolation, the clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. Among them, 815 patients underwent genetic analysis using AF-associated SNPs (cohort 2). Patients were delineated based on the developmental origin of the AF triggers: common PV, sinus venosus (SV), and primitive atrium (PA).

RESULTS

SV-origin extra-PV AF triggers occurred in 20.3% (n = 622) of patients, whereas PA-origin triggers occurred in 11.9% (n = 365) of patients in cohort 1. Multivariate analysis of cohort 2 revealed that female sex, lower body mass index, absence of hypertension, rs2634073 near PITX2, and rs6584555 in NEURL1 were associated with SV-AF, whereas nonparoxysmal AF and rs2634073 near PITX2 were predictors of PA-AF. The PA group had a significantly higher arrhythmia recurrence rate after repeated procedures than the common PV (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.34-2.29; P < 0.001) and SV-AF (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.19-1.45; P < 0.001) groups with more de novo AF triggers. However, the incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SV-derived AF triggers may have hereditary factors with a favorable postablation prognosis, whereas PA-derived triggers are linked to AF persistence and poor ablation response. Variants near PITX2 may play a pivotal role in extra-PV triggers.

Impact of residual induction number of non-pulmonary vein foci on the 2-year outcomes in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Residual non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci are significantly associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, we previously reported among patients with non-PV foci induced only once, none experienced AF recurrence. Thus, we aimed to investigate the correlation between the residual induction number of non-PV foci and ablation outcome in paroxysmal AF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated 55 paroxysmal AF patients with residual non-PV foci after PVI and ablation of non-PV-foci. Study patients were classified into the residual one-time induction of non-PV foci (residual OTI-nPVF) group (n = 23) and residual repeatedly induced non-PV foci (residual RI-nPVF) group (n = 32). Furthermore, the residual RI-nPVF group was divided into the low inducibility group (n = 10) and high inducibility group (n = 22) according to the presence or absence of non-PV foci provoked by two sets of drug induction tests (non-PV foci inducibility). In addition, the latter was divided into the ablation group (n = 14) or observation group (n = 8). The 2-year AF recurrence-free rate in the residual RI-nPVF group was significantly lower compared to the residual OTI-nPVF group (53% vs. 90%, p = 0.018). There was no significant difference of the 2-year AF recurrence-free rates in the inducibility of non-PV foci (p = 0.913) and the presence or absence of ablation (p = 0.812) in the residual RI-nPVF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among paroxysmal AF patients, the presence of residual RI-nPVF was associated with higher AF recurrence compared to residual OTI-nPVF. Furthermore, within residual RI-nPVF subgroup, non-PV foci inducibility or ablation of some residual RI-nPVF did not affect ablation outcome.

Fractionated non-pulmonary vein triggers contribute to spontaneous activity and initiating and maintaining paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A case report

Pulmonary vein (PV) antrum isolation (PVAI) that involves electrically isolating PV foci is a useful treatment strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, non-PV triggers during/after the PVAI are observed in approximately 30 % of AF cases, contributing to AF recurrence. We present the case of an 84-year-old woman who underwent ablation of recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal AF in our hospital. AF was easily induced following spontaneous activity (SA) from non-PV triggers even after completing the PVAI, left atrial posterior wall isolation with roof and bottom lines, and superior vena cava isolation. Interestingly, the area of the earliest activation site of the SAs initiating AF and that with a fractionation mapping score of ≥4 corresponded. AF was steadily terminated during ablation of this fractionated area, and the programmed stimulation could no longer induce any SA or AF. This case report demonstrated that the area with a score of ≥4 points on the fractionation mapping calculated by EnSite™ (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) during sinus rhythm may contribute to the initiation and maintenance of paroxysmal AF. In patients whose AF does not resolve during ablation, physicians may consider performing an additional targeted ablation of the area with a fractionation mapping score of ≥4, even in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Learning objective

The area with a fractionation mapping score of ≥4 calculated by EnSite™ during sinus rhythm might play an important role in producing spontaneous activities and initiating and maintaining paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Thus, if the AF does not terminate during ablation, physicians should consider performing an additional targeted ablation of the area with a fractionation mapping score of ≥4, even if it is paroxysmal.

Predictors of nonpulmonary vein triggers for atrial fibrillation: A clinical risk score

BACKGROUND

Targeting non-pulmonary vein triggers (NPVTs) after pulmonary vein isolation may reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Isoproterenol infusion and cardioversion of spontaneous or induced AF can provoke NPVTs but typically require vasopressor support and increased procedural time.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the presence of NPVTs and create a risk score to identify higher-risk subgroups.

METHODS

Using the AF ablation registry at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, we included consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation between January 2021 and December 2022. We excluded patients who did not receive NPVT provocation testing after failing to demonstrate spontaneous NPVTs. NPVTs were defined as non-pulmonary vein ectopic beats triggering AF or focal atrial tachycardia. We used risk factors associated with NPVTs with P <.1 in multivariable logistic regression model to create a risk score in a randomly split derivation set (80%) and tested its predictive accuracy in the validation set (20%).

RESULTS

In 1530 AF ablations included, NPVTs were observed in 235 (15.4%). In the derivation set, female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-2.03; P = .080), sinus node dysfunction (OR 1.67; 95% CI 0.98-2.87; P = .060), previous AF ablation (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.70-3.65; P <.001), and left atrial scar (OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.94-4.36; P <.001) were risk factors associated with NPVTs. The risk score created from these risk factors (PRE2SSS2 score; [PRE]vious ablation: 2 points, female [S]ex: 1 point, [S]inus node dysfunction: 1 point, left atrial [S]car: 2 points) had good predictive accuracy in the validation cohort (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.728; 95% CI 0.648-0.807).

CONCLUSION

A risk score incorporating predictors for NPVTs may allow provocation of triggers to be performed in patients with greatest expected yield.

Association between body mass index and results of cryoballoon ablation in Korean patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis from the Korean Heart Rhythm Society Cryoablation registry

AIMS

Pulmonary vein isolation using cryoablation is effective and safe in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although both obesity and underweight are associated with a higher risk for incident AF, there is limited data on the efficacy and safety following cryoablation according to body mass index (BMI) especially in Asians.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the Korean Heart Rhythm Society Cryoablation registry, a multicentre registry of 12 tertiary hospitals, we analysed AF recurrence and procedure-related complications after cryoablation by BMI (kg/m2) groups (BMI < 18.5, underweight, UW; 18.5-23, normal, NW; 23-25, overweight, OW; 25-30, obese Ⅰ, OⅠ; ≥30, obese Ⅱ, OⅡ). A total of 2648 patients were included (median age 62.0 years; 76.7% men; 55.6% non-paroxysmal AF). Patients were categorized by BMI groups: 0.9% UW, 18.7% NW, 24.8% OW, 46.1% OI, and 9.4% OII. Underweight patients were the oldest and had least percentage of non-paroxysmal AF (33.3%). During a median follow-up of 1.7 years, atrial arrhythmia recurred in 874 (33.0%) patients (incidence rate, 18.9 per 100 person-years). After multivariable adjustment, the risk of AF recurrence was higher in UW group compared with NW group (adjusted hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval; 2.55, 1.18-5.50, P = 0.02). Procedure-related complications occurred in 123 (4.7%) patients, and the risk was higher for UW patients (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval; 2.90, 0.94-8.99, P = 0.07), mainly due to transient phrenic nerve palsy.

CONCLUSION

Underweight patients showed a higher risk of AF recurrence after cryoablation compared with NW patients. Also, careful attention is needed on the occurrence of phrenic nerve palsy in UW patients.

A novel ablation strategy for recurrent atrial fibrillation: Fractionated signal area in the atrial muscle ablation 1-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) is sometimes challenging due to non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci. Fractionated signal area in the atrial muscle (FAAM) is a valid predictor of the location of non-PV foci. FAAM ablation has the potential to decrease the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with recurrent AF. We compared the clinical impact of FAAM ablation for recurrent AF, using 1 year follow up date.

METHODS

A total of 230 consecutive patients with symptomatic recurrent AF who underwent catheter ablation specifically targeting non-PV foci as FAAM-guided ablation (n = 113) and non-FAAM-guided ablation (n = 117) were retrospectively analyzed. FAAM was assigned a parameter (peaks slider, which indicates the number of components of fractionated signals), ranging from 1 to 15, indicating the location of the FAAM (1: largest, 15: smallest). FAAM-guided ablation was performed by ablating FAAM until none inducibility of non-PV foci. On the other hand, non-FAAM-guided ablation was performed via linear ablation, complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation, superior vena cava isolation, and focal ablation according to the location of the non-PV foci. The RHYTHMIA system was used to perform all the procedures. The primary endpoints were AF recurrence, atrial flutter, and/or atrial tachycardia.

RESULTS

After a 1-year follow up, freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia was achieved in 90.3% and 75.2% of patients in the FAAM and non-FAAM groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.438 [95% confidence interval: 0.243-0.788], p  =  .005).

CONCLUSIONS

FAAM ablation showed a promising decrease in the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with recurrent AF during a 1-year follow-up.

Comparison of advanced generation cryoballoon ablation and ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation with non-pulmonary vein trigger induction test and additional ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

An ablation index (AI)-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or 2nd generation cryoballoon (CB)-PVI has been shown to reduce the atrial fibrillation (AF) burden by 99% despite the absence of ablation of non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers in patients with paroxysmal AF. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of PVI alone strategy using 2nd generation CB compared with AI-guided PVI with an additional induction test and subsequent AF trigger ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We investigated 223 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF who underwent an initial PVI between August 2018 and August 2020. The study patients were divided into 2 groups: CB-PVI without an induction test (CB-PVI alone group, n = 82) and AI-guided PVI with an induction test and subsequent additional ablation of non-PV triggers (AI-PVI plus group, n = 141). In the AI-PVI plus group, a total of 62 non-PV triggers were induced in 38 patients, and non-PV triggers in 22 patients were completely ablated. The procedure time and left atrium dwell time were significantly shorter in the CB-PVI alone group than AI-PVI plus group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of procedural complications between the 2 groups (P = 0.650). The AF free survival rate in the CB-PVI alone group and AI-PVI plus group was 80% vs. 80% at 24 months (P = 0.969).

CONCLUSIONS

An PVI alone strategy using advanced generation CB did not differ in the clinical outcomes compared with an AI-guided PVI strategy with an induction test and subsequent ablation of non-PV triggers in the patients with paroxysmal AF.

Sex Differences in the Regional Analysis of Nonpulmonary Vein Foci and Epicardial Adipose Tissue in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The mechanism underlying the sex differences in atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is not fully understood. We hypothesized that non-PV foci and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) play a key role.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 304 consecutive patients (75% males) who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography and catheter ablation of AF were reviewed. The EAT around the atrium was measured separately in 4 parts of the atrium. All patients underwent high-dose isoproterenol infusions to assess the non-PV foci. Significantly more non-PV foci and less EAT around the atrium were observed in female patients than in male patients. In males, those with non-PV foci on the left atrial (LA) anterior wall had significantly greater EAT for the same lesions than those without non-PV foci. During a median follow-up of 27 months, the predictors of AF recurrence after first catheter ablation were female sex, presence of non-PV foci, LA diameter, and septal EAT index. A sex-specific analysis revealed that LA diameter was a predictor only in males and that the presence of non-PV foci in the septal region was a strong predictor in males (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.24) and females (HR: 3.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Sex-specific differences were observed in non-PV foci sites and local EAT and in regard to the predictors of AF recurrence.

Optimal single procedure strategy of pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon or radiofrequency and non-pulmonary vein triggers ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Background

Limited data exist on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon (CB) or radiofrequency (RF) ablation and additional non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (non-PAF). We aimed to assess the outcomes of first-stage catheter ablation for non-PAF patients.

Methods

Initial PVI was performed on 734 non-PAF patients (age: 64 ± 10 years; male: 584 (80%)) between September 2014 and June 2018 [315 (43%), CB ablation; 419 (57%), RF catheter]. A logistic regression model was used to match 257 pairs (514 patients) according to the propensity scores (CB or RF group). After PVI, additional non-PV trigger ablation was performed if induced by isoproterenol. We analysed the clinical outcomes of both groups.

Results

The mean procedural time was significantly shorter in the CB group (125 [range, 89–165] min) than in the RF group (190 [160–224] min; P < 0.001). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier event rate revealed similar atrial fibrillation-free survival rates between the two groups (CB: 77.9%, RF: 82.3%; log-rank P = 0.111). The additional ablation percentage for non-PV foci (CB: 39%, RF: 41%; P = 0.653) and complication incidence (CB: 5%, RF: 4%; P = 0.670) were also similar.

Conclusions

In non-PAF patients, the combination strategy of PVI using CB or RF ablation and non-PV trigger ablation achieved comparable outcomes.

Intra-atrial activation pattern is useful to localize the areas of non-pulmonary vein triggers of atrial fibrillation

Background

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an established ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF), however, PVI alone is insufficient to suppress AF recurrence. Non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) trigger ablation is one of the promising strategies beyond PVI and has been shown to be effective in refractory/persistent AF cases. To make non-PV trigger ablation more standardized, it is essential to develop a simple method to localize the origin of non-PV triggers.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 37 non-PV triggers in 751 ablation sessions for symptomatic AF from January 2017 to December 2020. Regarding non-PV triggers, intra-atrial activation interval from the earliest in right atrium (RA) to proximal coronary sinus (CS) (RA-CSp) and that from the earliest in RA to distal CS (RA-CSd) obtained by a basically-positioned duodecapolar RA-CS catheter were compared among 3 originating non-PV areas [RA, atrial septum (SEP) and left atrium (LA)].

Results

RA-CSp of RA non-PV trigger (56.4 ± 23.4 ms) was significantly longer than that of SEP non-PV (14.8 ± 25.6 ms, p = 0.019) and LA non-PV (-24.9 ± 27.9 ms, p = 0.0004). RA-CSd of RA non-PV (75.9 ± 32.1 ms) was significantly longer than that of SEP non-PV (34.2 ± 32.6 ms, p = 0.040) and LA non-PV (-13.3 ± 41.2 ms, p = 0.0008). RA-CSp and RA-CSd of SEP non-PV were significantly longer than those of LA non-PV (p = 0.022 and p = 0.016, respectively). Sensitivity and specificity of an algorithm to differentiate the area of non-PV trigger using RA-CSp (cut-off value: 50 ms) and RA-CSd (cut-off value: 0 ms) were 88% and 97% for RA non-PV, 81% and 73% for SEP non-PV, 65% and 95% for LA non-PV, respectively.

Conclusions

The analysis of intra-atrial activation sequences was useful to differentiate non-PV trigger areas. A simple algorithm to localize the area of non-PV trigger would be helpful to identify non-PV trigger sites in AF ablation.

Effect of isolation feasibility of non-pulmonary vein foci on efficacy of ablation for atrial fibrillation: comparison of the isolation and focal ablation methods

PURPOSE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) mainly originates from the pulmonary vein (PV). However, some AF triggers originate from other sites, namely non-PV foci, which are related to recurrence after AF ablation. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of isolation feasibility (isolability) of non-PV foci on the efficacy of AF ablation.

METHODS

Overall, 1855 patients with AF (age, 64.6 ± 10.9 years; 82% paroxysmal) underwent PV isolation, followed by induction and ablation of non-PV foci. Among them, 545 (29%) patients had non-PV foci; these patients were categorized into those with isolable non-PV foci (n = 196, 36%) and those with non-isolable non-PV foci (n = 349, 64%).

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 31.2 ± 15.6 months, recurrence was higher in the non-isolable group than in the isolable group (34% vs. 19%, P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed a significantly better 1-year clinical outcome in the isolable group than in the non-isolable group (88.0% vs. 78.4%, P < 0.001; hazard ratio (HR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.81). This outcome was not inferior to that of patients without non-PV foci (88.3% vs. 90.8%, P = 0.81). The non-isolable group showed poorer clinical outcomes than patients without non-PV foci (78.4% vs. 90.8%, P < 0.001; HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.22-1.53). Cox regression analysis revealed that isolability (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.89) and unmappability (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.55-5.37) of non-PV foci were significant predictors of arrhythmia recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The isolability of non-PV foci was a significant factor affecting the achievement of better clinical outcomes following AF ablation in patients with non-PV foci.

Rates of atrial flutter occurrence and cavotricuspid isthmus reconduction after prophylactic isthmus ablation performed during atrial fibrillation ablation: a clinical study, review, and comparison with previous findings

PURPOSE

Based on the high rate of coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL), prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) adjunctive to AF ablation has recently been attempted in patients with AF and without AFL. The present study aimed to determine the rates of AFL occurrence and CTI reconduction after performing CTI ablation adjunctive to AF ablation.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 3833 consecutive patients with AF, who underwent prophylactic CTIA with AF ablation between 2009 and 2020.

RESULTS

In all patients, CTIA and AF ablations were successful. Clinical AFL occurred in seven patients (0.18%, 7/3,833), and the observed rate was lower than those reported for cases of AF ablation without CTIA and for those of CTIA for pure AFL. A second ablation was needed in 745 patients at a median of 253 days (25 and 75 percentiles, 116 and 775 days) after the first ablation. In 12.1% (90/745) of the patients, CTI reconduction was observed. The reconduction rate was lower than that previously reported for CTIA for pure AFL.

CONCLUSIONS

The present retrospective study found acceptably low rates of clinical AFL occurrence and CTI reconduction following prophylactic CTIA performed with AF ablation, which was supported by the findings obtained after performing a comparison of the rates with those of other ablations (AF ablation only and CTIA for pure AFL). Considering the high correlation between AF and AFL, the present study provided information regarding the efficacy of adjunctive CTIA.

Impact of the sinus node recovery time after termination of atrial fibrillation during catheter ablation on clinical outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Although long sinus arrest is occasionally observed during atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation when the fibrillation was terminated, its meaning and prognosis have not yet been clearly elucidated. We hypothesized that sinus node recovery time (SNRT) after termination of AF (time from termination of AF to the earliest sinus node activation) could reflect the extent of atrial remodeling, influencing the formation of non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) triggers and post-ablation outcomes.

METHOD

The participants were 157 consecutive patients with persistent AF (male: 77.1%, age: 63.3±11.2 years) who underwent catheter ablation. We recorded SNRT after terminating AF by radiofrequency delivery or electrical cardioversion during the first ablation and evaluated the relationships between SNRT and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and between SNRT and non-PV triggers after repeat ablation.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (28.7%) experienced recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Patients with recurrence had longer SNRTs (1738 ms vs. 1394 ms, p = 0.012). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only SNRT ≥2128ms was a significant independent predictor of clinical AF recurrence (hazard ratio 7.48; 95% confidence interval 2.94-19.00; P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimator showed that the recurrence-free rate was significantly lower if ≥ 2128ms (log-rank, p<0.001). Thirty-five patients (77.8%) underwent a second ablation. Although there was no difference in the rate of pulmonary vein reconnections (78.6% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.712), non-PV triggers were observed more frequently in the longer SNRT group (57.1% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a prolonged SNRT had a higher prevalence of AF recurrence after the first ablation and higher inducibility of non-PV triggers. Measuring SNRT might be used for the stratification of patients with persistent AF.

Approach to recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly observed sustained rhythm disorder during adult ages. Since it has been shown that the ectopic beat initiating AF is usually caused by pulmonary veins, AF ablation has become the mainstay of therapy worldwide. Cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation are the most commonly used methods in today's technologies. However, despite technological advances, the success of a single procedure in AF ablation is still limited and multiple procedures may be required for the majority of patients. In cases in which a redo ablation is required, pulmonary vein isolation is still the main target, but non-pulmonary vein targets should also be considered in AF episodes that continue despite multiple ablations. Many issues are still unclear as to which energy to choose in the first procedure, and what ablation strategy will be utilized when a redo ablation is required. The studies on this subject are very limited but, it still seems feasible and a rational approach to utilize a customized treatment strategy in each specific patient subgroup.

Presence of non-pulmonary vein foci in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing standard ablation of pulmonary vein isolation: Clinical characteristics and long-term ablation outcome

Background

The clinical characteristics of atrial fibrillation (AF) resulting from non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with AF caused by non-PV triggers, localization of non-PV foci, clinical differences, and clinical outcomes after catheter ablation in each AF focus.

Methods

A total of 2967 patients who underwent initial catheter ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF were examined. After PV isolation, all patients underwent high-dose isoproterenol infusion to assess the existence of non-PV foci.

Results

Non-PV foci were identified in 564 patients (19.2%). The localization of successfully ablated non-PV foci in 514 patients were the superior vena cava (SVC: 213 cases), interatrial septum (IAS: 125 cases), coronary sinus (CS: 98 cases), right atrium (RA: 125 cases), left atrium (LA: 114 cases), and unmappable (50 cases). Multivariate analysis revealed that female gender, low body mass index (BMI), non-paroxysmal AF (PAF), and sick sinus syndrome were independent and significant indicators of non-PV foci. In the multivariate analysis of each AF focus, female gender, low BMI, and non-PAF were significant predictors of IAS and CS foci, RA and IAS foci, and CS foci, respectively. In addition, dilatation of the LA was significantly associated with LA foci, whereas RA, LA, IAS, and CS foci were associated with AF recurrence.

Conclusion

These findings could help to identify patients at a higher risk of AF caused by non-PV triggers and clarify the clinical difference according to the localization of non-PV foci.

Association between the locations of non-pulmonary vein triggers and ablation outcomes in repeat procedures after cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

We examined the characteristics of non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers in repeat ablation after cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

METHODS

This study evaluated 119 patients undergoing a second ablation procedure for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) after cryoballoon PV isolation (CB-PVI) for PAF.

RESULTS

Fifty-three of 119 (45%) patients had PV reconnection. All reconnected PVs were isolated. No non-PV triggers were elicited in 42/119 (35%) patients (NNPV group). In 77/119 (65%) patients, 139 isoproterenol-induced non-PV triggers, including 45 triggers that initiated AF, were identified. Non-PV triggers initiating AF were observed at the superior vena cava (SVC), left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) including the PV antra, interatrial septum, right atrium, left atrial appendage/mitral anulus, and coronary sinus in 14 (12%), 10 (8%), 8 (7%), 7 (6%), 4 (3%), and 2 (2%) patients, respectively. Non-PV triggers originated from only the SVC and/or LAPW including the PV antra, and the SVC and/or LAPW was isolated in 18/119 (15%) patients (SVC/LAPW group). Non-PV triggers originating from other sites were focally ablated in 59/119 (50%) patients (OS group). During a median 461 days of follow-up, 39/42 (93%), 17/18 (94%), and 38/59 (64%) patients in the NNPV, SVC/LAPW, and OS groups, respectively, remained ATA recurrence-free. The recurrence rate was higher in the OS group than in the NNPV (P = 0.005) or SVC/LAPW groups (P = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Over half of patients had non-PV triggers at subsequent ablation after CB-PVI. Non-PV triggers from the SVC/LAPW can be eliminated more successfully than triggers from other sites.

Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

Little evidence exists regarding cryoballoon ablation (CBA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We compared CBA and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of PAF in HD patients, referring to CBA of PAF in non-HD patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This historical cohort study examined 88 patients who underwent catheter ablation of PAF, including 21 HD patients with a second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon (CB-HD group), 17 HD patients with a non-force-sensing radiofrequency catheter (RF-HD group), and 50 non-HD patients with a cryoballoon (CB-non-HD group). Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation alone aside from cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was performed in 14 (67%) in the CB-HD group, 12 (71%) in the RF-HD group, and 36 (72%) in the CB-non-HD group (P = 0.95), without isoproterenol-induced non-PV triggers. Non-PV trigger ablation was added to the other patients. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence without antiarrhythmic drugs after a single procedure was 76%, 59%, and, 92% in the CB-HD, RF-HD, and CB-non-HD groups, respectively (P = 0.002). The mean procedure time was shorter in the CB-HD group than in the RF-HD group (127 vs. 199 min; P < 0.001). In the second procedure, the median number of reconnected pulmonary veins was 0.5 in the CB-HD group versus 2.0 in the RF-HD group (P = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

For PAF in HD patients, CBA showed a comparable single-procedure efficacy to that of RFA with a short procedure time. CBA may be a reasonable initial procedure for HD patients suffering from symptomatic PAF.