In silico analysis of the relation between conventional and high‐power short‐duration RF ablation settings and resulting lesion metrics

Index-Guided High-Power Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Studies have suggested the superiority of high-power compared to standard-power radiofrequency ablation ablation (RFCA). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of high-power compared to standard-power RFCA guided by ablation index (AI) or lesion index (LSI).

RECENT FINDINGS

A systematic review and meta-analysis study comparing IGHP and IGLP approaches for AF ablation was conducted. The relevant published studies comparing IGHP and IGSP methods for RFCA in AF patients until October 2022 were collected from Cochrane, ProQuest, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. A total of 2579 AF patients from 11 studies were included, 1682 received IGHP RFCA, and 897 received IGSP RFCA. To achieve successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), the IGHP RFCA group had a significantly shorter procedure time than the IGHP RFCA group (mean difference (MD) -19.91 min; 95% CI -25.23 to -14.59 min; p < 0.01), radiofrequency (RF) application time (MD -10.92 min; 95% CI -14.70 to -7.13 min; p < 0.01), and fewer number of lesions (MD -10.90; 95% CI -18.77 to -3.02; p < 0.01) than the IGSP RFCA. First-pass PVI was significantly greater in the IGHP RFCA group than in the IGSP RFCA group (risk ratio (RR) 1.17; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.28; p < 0.01). The IGHP RFCA is an effective and efficient strategy for AF ablation. The superiority of IGHP RFCA includes the shorter procedure time, shorter RF application time, fewer number of lesions for complete PVI, and more excellent first-pass PVI.

In vivo tissue temperature during lesion size index-guided 50W ablation versus 30W ablation: A porcine study

BACKGROUND

Neither the actual in vivo tissue temperatures reached with lesion size index (LSI)-guided high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation for atrial fibrillation nor the safety profile has been elucidated.

METHODS

We conducted a porcine study (n = 7) in which, after right thoracotomy, we implanted 6-8 thermocouples epicardially in the superior vena cava, right pulmonary vein, and esophagus close to the inferior vena cava. We compared tissue temperatures reached during 50 W-HPSD ablation with those reached during standard (30 W) ablation, both targeting an LSI of 5.0 (5-15 g contact force).

RESULTS

T_max  (maximum tissue temperature when the thermocouple was located ≤5 mm from the catheter tip) reached during HPSD ablation was modestly higher than that reached during standard ablation (58.0 ± 10.1°C vs. 53.6 ± 9.2°C; p = .14) and peak tissue temperature correlated inversely with the distance between the catheter tip and the thermocouple, regardless of the power settings (HPSD: r = -0.63; standard: r = -0.66). Lethal temperature (≥50°C) reached 6.3 ± 1.8 s and 16.9 ± 16.1 s after the start of HPSD and standard ablation, respectively (p = .002), and it was best predicted at a catheter tip-to-thermocouple distance cut point of 2.8 and 5.3 mm, respectively. All lesions produced by HPSD ablation and by standard ablation were transmural. There was no difference between HPSD ablation and standard ablation in the esophageal injury rate (70% vs. 75%, p = .81), but the maximum distance from the esophageal adventitia to the injury site tended to be shorter (0.94 ± 0.29 mm vs. 1.40 ± 0.57 mm, respectively; p = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

Actual tissue temperatures reached with LSI-guided HPSD ablation appear to be modestly higher, with a shorter distance between the catheter tip and thermocouple achieving lethal temperature, than those reached with standard ablation. HPSD ablation lasting <6 s may help minimize lethal thermal injury to the esophagus lying at a close distance.

Comparison between High-Power Short-Duration and Conventional Ablation Strategy in Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis

High-power short-duration (HPSD) setting during radiofrequency ablation has become an attempt to improve atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment outcomes. This study ought to compare the efficacy, safety, and effectiveness between HPSD and conventional settings. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched. Studies that compared HPSD and conventional radiofrequency ablation settings in AF patients were included while studies performed additional ablations on nonpulmonary vein targets without clear recording were excluded. Data were pooled with random-effect model. Efficacy endpoints include first-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), acute pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection, free from AF, and free from atrial tachycardia (AT) during follow-up. Safety endpoints include esophagus injury rate and major complication rate. Effectiveness endpoints include complete PVI rate, total procedure time, PVI time, and PVI radiofrequency ablation (PVI RF) time. We included 22 studies with 3867 atrial fibrillation patients in total (2393 patients received HPSD radiofrequency ablation). Perioperatively, the HPSD group showed a higher first-pass PVI rate (risk ratio, $\text{RR}=1.10$ , $P=0.0001$ ) and less acute PV reconnection rate ( $\text{RR}=0.56$ , $P=0.0004$ ) than the conventional group. During follow-up, free from AF ( $\text{RR}=1.11$ , $P=0.16$ ) or AT ( $\text{RR}=1.06$ , $P=0.24$ ) rate did not differ between HPSD and conventional groups 6-month postsurgery. However, the HPSD group showed both higher free from AF ( $\text{RR}=1.17$ , $P=0.0003$ ) and AT ( $\text{RR}=1.11$ , $P<0.0001$ ) rate than the conventional group 12-month postsurgery. The esophagus injury ( $\text{RR}=0.99$ , $P=0.98$ ) and major complications ( $\text{RR}=0.76$ , $P=0.70$ ) rates did not differ between the two groups. The HPSD group took shorter total procedure time ( $\text{MD}=-33.71$ 95% CI: -43.10 to -24.33, $P<0.00001$ ), PVI time ( $\text{MD}=-21.60$ 95% CI: -25.00 to -18.21, $P<0.00001$ ), and PVI RF time ( $\text{MD}=-13.72$ , 95% CI: -14.45 to -13.00, $P<0.00001$ ) than conventional groups while complete procedure rate did not differ between two groups ( $\text{RR}=1.00$ , $P=0.93$ ). HPSD setting during AF radiofrequency ablation has better effectiveness, efficacy, and similar safety compared with the conventional setting.

Comparison between the novel diamond temp and the classical 8-mm tip ablation catheters in the setting of typical atrial flutter

PURPOSE

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is widely accepted as a first-line therapy for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL). The novel DiamondTemp (DT) catheter with temperature feedback during RF ablation has been released recently on the market. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of DiamondTemp (DT) technology on ablation efficiency during AFL.

METHODS

In this single-center study, 30 consecutive patients with typical AFL indicated to ablation of CTI were included. The first 15 patients underwent CTI ablation using 8-mm tip catheter, and the following 15 patients underwent temperature-controlled RF ablation using DT catheter. The endpoints were number and mean total duration of RF applications, mean temperature reached in the setting of CTI, procedural times, and fluoroscopy times.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning baseline characteristics. Mean duration of the each application (71.5 s ± 30.6 vs 12.4 s ± 13.2, p value < 0.001), mean total duration of RF applications (517,73 s ± 377,96 vs 112,8 s ± 43,58; p value < 0.001), procedural times (51.6 min ± 24.2 vs 38.6 ± 8.2; p = 0.03), and fluoroscopy times (16.2 min ± 10.2 vs 8 min ± 4.24; p = 0.005) were longer in the 8-mm ablation catheter group. Mean temperature measurements (51.9 °C ± 3.59 vs 56.7 °C ± 3.34, p value < 0.003) were as well lower in the 8-mm ablation catheter group.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation of CTI-dependent AFL by means of DT resulted in a significant reduction of total and single application RF delivery time, procedure, and fluoroscopy times.

[Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy]

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an effective treatment option of scar-related ventricular tachycardias (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Several studies proved the benefit of VT catheter ablation, which has become routine in most electrophysiology laboratories. This article provides practical instructions to perform a VT catheter ablation. The authors describe conventional and substrate-based mapping and ablation strategies as well as concepts for image integration. This article continues a series of publications created for education in advanced electrophysiology.

Computer modeling of radiofrequency cardiac ablation: 30 years of bioengineering research

This review begins with a rationale of the importance of theoretical, mathematical and computational models for radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (RFCA). We then describe the historical context in which each model was developed, its contribution to the knowledge of the physics of RFCA and its implications for clinical practice. Next, we review the computer modeling studies intended to improve our knowledge of the biophysics of RFCA and those intended to explore new technologies. We describe the most important technical details of the implementation of mathematical models, including governing equations, tissue properties, boundary conditions, etc. We discuss the utility of lumped element models, which despite their simplicity are widely used by clinical researchers to provide a physical explanation of how RF power is absorbed in different tissues. Computer model verification and validation are also discussed in the context of RFCA. The article ends with a section on the current limitations, i.e. aspects not yet included in state-of-the-art RFCA computer modeling and on future work aimed at covering the current gaps.

High-power, short-duration ablation for atrial fibrillation: Pros and cons

This article reviews and compares the rationale and evidence supporting high-power, short-duration radiofrequency (RF) ablation with those of conventional-power, conventional-duration RF ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). The pros and cons of each approach, biophysics of ablation, pre-clinical studies informing clinical utilization, and the accumulated clinical evidence are presented. Both conventional-power, conventional-duration RF ablation and high-power, short-duration ablation are similarly safe, and effective approaches for AF ablation. Theoretical advantages of high-power, short-duration ablation, including greater procedure efficiency and limited conductive heating of collateral structures, must be weighed against the narrower safety margin related to rapid energy delivery during high power ablation.

Impact of a formula combining local impedance and conventional parameters on lesion size prediction

BACKGROUND

Although ablation energy (AE) and force-time integral (FTI) are well-known active predictors of lesion characteristics, these parameters do not reflect passive tissue reactions during ablation, which may instead be represented by drops in local impedance (LI). This study aimed to investigate if additional LI data improves predicting lesion characteristics and steam pops.

METHODS

RF applications at a range of powers (30 W, 40 W, and 50 W), contact forces (8 g, 15 g, 25 g, and 35 g), and durations (10-180 s) using perpendicular/parallel catheter orientations were performed in excised porcine hearts (N = 30). The correlation between AE, FTI, and lesion characteristics was examined, and the impact of LI (%LI drop (%LID) defined by the ΔLI divided by the initial LI) was additionally assessed.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-five lesions without steam pops were examined. Ablation energy (W × s) and FTI (g × s) showed a positive correlation with lesion depth (ρ = 0.824:P < 0.0001 and ρ = 0.708:P < 0.0001), surface area (ρ = 0.507:P < 0.0001 and ρ = 0.562:P < 0.0001), and volume (ρ = 0.807:P < 0.0001 and ρ = 0.685:P < 0.0001). %LID also showed a positive correlation individually with lesion depth (ρ = 0.643:P < 0.0001), surface area (ρ = 0.547:P < 0.0001), and volume (ρ = 0.733:P < 0.0001). However, the combined indices of AE × %LID (AE multiplied by %LID) and FTI × %LID (FTI multiplied by %LID) provided significantly stronger correlation with lesion depth (ρ = 0.834:P < 0.0001 and ρ = 0.809:P < 0.0001), surface area (ρ = 0.529:P < 0.0001 and ρ = 0.656:P < 0.0001), and volume (ρ = 0.864:P < 0.0001 and ρ = 0.838:P < 0.0001). This tendency was observed regardless of the catheter placement (parallel/perpendicular). AE (P = 0.02) and %LID (P = 0.002) independently remained as significant predictors to predict steam pops (N = 27). However, the AE × %LID did not increase the predictive power of steam pops compared to the AE alone.

CONCLUSION

LI, when combined with conventional parameters (AE and FTI), may provide stronger correlation with lesion characteristics.

The use of a high-power (50 W), ablation index-guided protocol for ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus

BACKGROUND

High-power (HP) ablation protocols are increasingly used for ablation procedures to shorten procedural times and improve short- and long-term success. The ablation index (AI) combines contact force, power settings, and ablation time. It can be used in combination with HP protocols to guide operators toward standardized lesions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate both a HP and AI-guided strategy for ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) in patients with typical atrial flutter (AFL).

METHODS

In this single-center study, consecutive patients with typical AFL (n = 52, mean age 68.7 ± 8.3 years, 21/52 [40.4%] female) underwent AI-guided HP radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the CTI. Ablation was performed with 50 W and AI target values of 550 with a maximum ablation duration of 25 seconds per lesion. Target interlesion distance was ≤6 mm. Ablation was performed with a 3.5 mm porous tip Smarttouch SF catheter.

RESULTS

Acute CTI block was achieved in 52 of 52 patients (100%), and first-pass conduction block was achieved in 41 of 52 patients (80.4%). Spontaneous reconduction after 30 minutes waiting time occurred in 1 of 52 (1.9%) patient. Average ablation time until CTI block was 3:51 ± 1:40; 2:33 ± 1:01 minutes of bonus ablation pulses were applied after CTI block. An audible steam pop was noted in one patient (1.9%). No major complications occurred. After a mean follow-up of 193.7 ± 152.2 days, no patient showed recurrence of typical AFL.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, AI-guided HP ablation of the CTI was fast, safe, and effective.

Impedance, power, and current in radiofrequency ablation: Insights from technical, ex vivo, and clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency (RF) power is routinely considered during RF application. In contrast, impedance has been relatively poorly studied, despite also influencing RF lesion creation. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of electric impedance on RF lesion characteristics and on clinical RF ablation parameters.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the first part of the study, power and impedance were systematically varied and the resulting current was calculated using custom-made software. In the second part of the study, ablation lesions (n = 40) were analyzed in a porcine ex vivo model. RF applications were delivered in cardiac muscle preparations with systematically varied values of electric impedance using a contact force ablation catheter. In the third part of the study, n = 3378 clinical RF applications were analyzed, power, impedance, and current data were exported and correlated with clinical patient data. 20 ± 3 W/80 Ω, 30 ± 3 W/120 Ω, 40 ± 3 W/160 Ω, and 50 ± 3 W/200 Ω RF applications resulted in 498 ± 40, 499 ± 26, 500 ± 20, and 500 ± 16 mA RF current, which were not significantly different (p = .32). Ablation lesions were significantly different in depth and diameter when applied with the same power but different impedances (p < .01); lesion sizes decreased when increasing impedance. In clinical data, a large range of delivered current (e.g., 39-40 W: 530-754 mA) was measured, due to variations in impedance.

CONCLUSIONS

RF lesion creation is determined by current rather than by power. During clinical RF ablation procedures, impedance significantly influences current delivery and varies considerably between patients. Impedance and current are clinically relevant parameters that should be considered during RF ablation.

Lesion characteristics between cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency ablation with a contact force-sensing catheter: Late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging assessment

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) lesions after cryoballoon ablation (CBA) are characterized as a wider and more continuous than that after conventional radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) without the contact force (CF)-sensing technology. However, the impact on the lesion characteristics of ablation with a CF-sensing catheter has not been well discussed. We sought to assess the lesions using late-gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) and to compare the differences between the two groups (CB group vs. RF group).

METHODS

A total of 30 consecutive patients who underwent PVI were enrolled (CB group, 18; RF group, 12). The RF applications were delivered with a target lesion size index (LSI) of 5. The PVI lesions were assessed by LGE-MRI 3 months after the PVI. The region around the PV was divided into eight segments: roof, anterior-superior, anterior carina, anterior inferior, bottom, posterior inferior, posterior carina, and posterior superior segment. The lesion width and visual gap of each segment were compared between the two groups. The visual gaps were defined as no-enhancement site of >4 mm.

RESULTS

The mean LSI was 4.7 ± 0.7. The lesion width was significantly wider but the visual gaps were more frequently documented at the bottom segment of right PV in the CBA group (lesion width: 8.1 ± 2.2 vs. 6.3 ± 2.2 mm; p = .032; visual gap at the bottom segment or right PV: 39% vs. 0%; p = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

The PVI lesion was wider after CBA, while the visual gaps were fewer after RFCA with a CF-sensing catheter.